8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Identifiers
1. Project
name:
2.
GEF Implementing Agency:
Development and Implementation of GEF Implementing Agency: UNEP
Mechanisms to Disseminate Lessons
Learned and Best Practices in Integrated
Transboundary Water Resources
Management in Latin America and the
Caribbean
3.
Country/ies in which the project 4. Country
eligibility:
is being implemented:
All countries are eligible for seeking GEF funds as per
Brazil, in close consultation with Latin Paragraph 9 (b) of the Instrument
American and Caribbean States
5.
GEF Focal Area:
6.
Operational Program/short-term measure:
International Waters
GEF Operational Program 10: Contaminant-based
Program (see para 10.6)
7.
Project linkage to national priorities, action plans and programs:
The countries of Latin America and the Caribbean region, in approving the Plan of Action for
Sustainable Development at their Bolivia Summit in December 1996, entrusted the Organisation of
American States (OAS) with the responsibility to follow-up this declaration on a hemispheric basis.
The resulting Inter-American Plan for Sustainable Development, affirmed at the Bolivia Summit,
targeted the management of transboundary water resources as a key element of the Plan, which
embodied the country-level water resources and economic development plans of the Latin American
and Caribbean States. In parallel with these efforts, the countries further agreed upon the
establishment of the Inter-American Water Resources Network (IWRN) as a mechanism to share
experiences and disseminate information. A key feature of the IWRN initiative has been the
convening of a series of Inter-American Dialogues on Water Resources, the fourth of which has been
organised and hosted by Brazil in September 2001. The integration of this initiative with the country-
level water resources plans and policies is consistent with the regional approach established in the
World Water Vision, and with the global initiative to enhance information dissemination through the
GEF IW:LEARN process.
8.
GEF national operational focal point and date of country endorsement:
Submitted:
Acknowledged: Endorsed:
Six countries from LAC endorsed the proposal. Brazil endorsed it on 07/02/2001 (see Annex III).
Additional endorsement letters from St Vincent and Grenadines, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and
Panama were subsequently received and are attached in Annex III. IW:LEARN also expressed its
support for the project (see Annex IV)
Project Objectives and Activities
9.
Project rationale and objectives:
Indicators:
With a view to promoting South-to-South Lessons learned in water resources management
learning, the project's objective is to develop as a result of GEF-IW projects have been
and implement mechanisms to disseminate the identified, disseminated, and institutionalised in
lessons being learned in GEF International Latin America and the Caribbean, through the
Waters1-related projects in Latin America and medium of the IWRN and other media.
1 This project intends to cover all components of the hydrological system within and adjacent to the LAC region, including surface waters, ground
waters, coastal waters and large marine ecosystems as per the GEF definition of "International Waters" as presented in the Operational Strategy on
page 49 i.e. "The term "international waters" as used for the purposes of the GEF Operational Strategy, includes the oceans, large marine
ecosystems, enclosed or semi-enclosed seas and estuaries as well as rivers, lakes, groundwater systems, and wetlands with transboundary drainage
1
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
the Caribbean in order to develop capacity to
improve water resources management. In doing The knowledge base and lessons learned in water
so, this Medium Size Project would assist the resources management, as well as the mechanisms
International Waters-Learn (IW:LEARN)
for their dissemination developed through this
project, being implemented by UNDP and project are being used by (1) the IW:LEARN
executed in part by UNEP (IW Best Practices project in other GEF regions and by (2) the
Database), to implement its mandate of helping IW:LEARN Best Practices Database component
countries as part of a global effort to improve implemented by UNEP.
communications and outreach. Specifically, the
project would act as an IW:LEARN National water management authorities and river
demonstration/pilot project using Latin America basin authorities assimilate lessons learned and
and the Caribbean as a privileged site to knowledge in their planning and decision-making
illustrate the functioning of a network system. processes.
This network would facilitate the exchange of
project experiences and results, provide a
mechanism for the dissemination of lessons
learned and best management practices to
improve water resources management, as well as
encourage the assimilation of lessons learned
into national water resources management
policies and river basin master plans. In doing
so this Medium Size Project will provide
IW:LEARN with a model for parallel activities
in other region thereby leveraging the
experience gained in LAC to benefit GEF-IW
activities world-wide building a larger system of
global knowledge sharing.
10. Project
outcomes:
Indicators:
1.
Better informed water resources
1. National water management policies, river
management communities in the Americas;
basin strategic action programs, and watershed
enhanced sharing of critical water resources
management plans reflect the integrated
management knowledge, experiences, and
approach to water resources management.
best practices; and strengthened
collaboration amongst riparian countries
leading to improved water resources
management.
2. Processes for sharing experiences and 2.
Published documents and materials
lessons learned from GEF-International
disseminate best practices resulting from GEF-
Waters (GEF-IW) projects in Latin America
IW projects in water resources management.
and the Caribbean identified, tested, and
Project twinning.
refined for future use (e.g. the global
knowledge sharing system of IW:LEARN
and its IW Best Practices Database
component implemented by UNEP). This
new system will act as an IW:LEARN pilot
site using LAC experience and knowledge
basins or common borders...".
2
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
benefiting as well from the variety of
currently developed tools and mechanisms
under IW:LEARN.
3. Increased capacity of water management 3. IWRN (and/or related sites) make accessible
organisations and river basin authorities for
GEF-IW project experiences, results, best
sharing information and experiences via the
practices, and water resources management
Internet as well as through other media.
knowledge base. Similar information would
also be available from IW:LEARN and its
Best Practices Database for parallel global and
regional activities.
4. Lessons learned and best practices from 4. Redesigned IWRN web page with a systematic
GEF-IW projects disseminated using the
process for updating the information is
IWRN as a platform.
available, and its maintenance and financial
sustainability are guaranteed once GEF
funding is over.
5. Lessons learned and best practices on critical 5. IWRN participating and providing inputs for
water resources management knowledge
technical agendas of international meetings on
gathered through this project forming critical
water related issues.
inputs for further discussion at the major
forthcoming water meetings (e.g. Third
World Water Forum).
6. Strengthened IWRN.
6. Virtual Fora for broad discussion on water
management issues are functioning.
7. Strengthened civil society participation in 7. Partnerships between local organisations and
water resources management projects.
governmental agencies are established and are
applying the principals set forth in the Inter-
American Strategy for Public Participation in
Decision-making for Sustainable Development
to land and water management issues
11. Planned activities to achieve outcomes :
Indicators:
1. Foster dialogue amongst GEF-IW and
1. A framework for documenting and
other related water resource management
disseminating experiences, lessons learned and
projects in LAC establishing a mechanism to
information created, as well as best water
share recent accomplishments, experiences in resources management practices.
the planning and management of GEF-IW
projects, lessons learned, and best practices
identified.
1.1. As a follow-up to the GEF-IW-LAC
1.1. Proceedings/reports of the regional
2 Potentially leading to the formation of thematic centers of excellence (e.g. within the Bermejo river basin, a Center of Excellence for all land
degradation issues) according to the special area of emphasis addressed by specific GEF-IW projects (see also annex I).
3
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
project managers e-forum of July-August
meetings posted on the IWRN Web site, and
2001, and its complementary 2-day face to
printed to be distributed to participants.
face meeting at the margins of DIALOGUE
IV (September 2001), convene three regional
meetings to exchange knowledge,
experiences, lessons learned and best
practices amongst GEF-IW and other water
resources management project managers.
1.2. Implement Virtual Fora (both thematic 2
1.2. Virtual Fora in place and operational with
and/or per sub-regions) to facilitate the
resulting documents and findings from
information exchange on water resources
discussions available on the IWRN Web page
management issues, outlining lessons learned
and populating the IWRN and IW:LEARN
and best practices, using IWRN as a platform
Best Practices Databases.
with the IWRN Secretariat acting as
moderator for the electronic discussion. This
will provide inputs to major forthcoming
global international waters meetings (e.g.
Third World Water Forum).
1.3. As a result of both the face to face
1.3. Water resources management
meetings and the Virtual Fora, prepare and
report/brochure outlining best practices and
disseminate a comprehensive
lessons learned for the Americas prepared and
document/brochure and CD in the four OAS
posted on the IWRN web site, and presented at
languages outlining best water resources
global international water meetings e.g. the
practices and lessons learned in the Americas,
Third World Water Forum and its ancillary
to be presented at the Third World Water
meetings.
Forum and related meetings.
1.4. Support participation of key GEF-IW
1.4. GEF-IW project managers attend major
project managers in the series of global &
global and international water meetings.
international water meetings amongst which
the Third World Water Forum and its
ancillary meetings.
1.5. Encourage and facilitate project twinning
1.5. Twinned projects fostering exchange of
activities (e.g. between the Sao Francisco and
lessons learned, best practices and knowledge.
the San Juan projects) including inter alia
field trips and personnel exchange.
2. Foster the inclusion of lessons learned and 2. National water plans incorporate lessons and
best practices into water resources
best practices learned through GEF-IW
management practices.
projects.
2.1. Develop specific guidelines for inclusion
2.1. Document/report containing guidelines of
of best practices and lessons learned into the
best practices and lessons learned from GEF-
4
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
development of new water resources IW projects published.
management activities. This will be done in
close consultation with IW:LEARN and
specifically with its Best Practices Database
component implemented by UNEP.
2.2. Conduct three regional training 2.2. Reports/proceedings of three sub-regional
workshops with a view to promoting the
meetings posted on the IWRN, distributed to
inclusion of lessons learned and best
participants, and presented at the series of
practices in the development of new projects
major international water meetings e.g. the
and water resources policies.
Third World Water Forum.
3. Strengthening the IWRN as the principal
3. Web site of IWRN registering an increased
hemispheric communication tool for
number of visitors.
integrated water resources management.
3.1. Prepare a framework to strengthen the
3.1. New work plan for the IWRN prepared
IWRN as a hemispheric communication tool
and approved by the IWRN national focal
for integrated land and water resources
points and advisory council.
management.
3.2. Redesign the IWRN web site--making it
3.2. New and more user-friendly IWRN Web
an interactive metadata site ensuring sites format including a functioning Virtual
information exchange rather than just
Forum.
information dissemination--using protocols
for searching, accessing, and acquiring
information and data to enhance its dialogue
function.
3.3. Establish a sub-regional node in Brazil
3.3. Sub-regional node in Brazil and possibly
and possibly as well in one or several
with thematic centers of excellence functioning
potentially identified thematic centers of
and being used for information sharing and
excellence (see 1.2 above)--as pilot sites
dissemination.
within this activity--to test the website and
related communications tools.
3.4. Convene one workshop to assess the
3.4. A report containing the results of at least
needs for training and equipment for water
one workshop with participation by water
resource professionals and NGOs within
resource professionals and NGOs to evaluate
Brazil and thematic centres of excellence to
the accessibility to IRWN Network, needs,
promote access to, and use of, the IWRN
and/or obstacles to use.
information system.
3.5. Assist countries to secure financing for
3.5. Secured financing from other donors for
the establishment of IWRN regional nodes in
the establishment of IWRN regional nodes in
the Americas.
Central America, the Caribbean countries and
the Southern Cone.
5
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
3.6. Ensure adequate linkages between
3.6. Linkages between IWRN and other
IWRN and other regional and sub-regional
regional and sub-regional networks involved in
networks (e.g. SIDSNet, CIC,...) involved in
water resources management established and
water resources management
operational.
4. Involve civil society according to principles 4. Involvement of civil society secured.
set forth in the Inter-American Strategy for
Public Participation in Environmental
Decision-Making (ISP).
4.1. Identify five sub-regional and/or national
4.1. Established agreement with NGOs to
(one in each of the sub-regions of the
identify and present proposals for the five
Americas) potential pilot projects to test the
potential pilot projects.
principals of ISP within the IWRN
framework.
4.2. Organise a special meeting of GEF-IW
4.2. Report of a special meeting of GEF-IW
and other water resources management
and other water resources management project
project managers and ISP focal points to
managers and ISP focal points on the inclusion
facilitate the inclusion of the principles of the
of ISP principles in water resources
Inter-American Strategy for Public management activities.
Participation in water resource management
projects, and help to reduce
misunderstandings and conflicts through
proper consultation with the civil society.
5. Monitoring and Evaluation.
5. Project activities monitored and evaluated.
5.1. In addition to the monitoring and
5.1. Diligent monitoring and evaluation
evaluation activities exercised by the GEF
exercised by both UNEP and the OAS. Mid-
Implementing Agency, and in addition to the
term and final evaluation reports prepared,
day-to-day monitoring of activities by the
published, and available on the IWRN Web
GS/OAS as the Executing Agency, GS/OAS
site.
will co-ordinate a mid-term and final
evaluation of the project activities.
12. Estimated budget (in US $ or local currency): [Project duration: 22 months]
GEF: US $ 972,000
Co-financing: US $ 470,000 (US $ 170,000 in cash and US $ 280,000 in-kind)
US $ 100,000 (OAS, in-kind)
US $ 95,000 (UNEP, in-kind)
Total: US $ 1,637,000
13.
Information on project proposer:
The Secretariat of Water Resources (SRH) is part of the Brazilian Ministry of Environment (MMA),
and is responsible for defining national policy for water resources management. In this role, the
Secretariat co-ordinates countrywide projects with local and foreign financial support. Since 1996,
6
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Brazil has been executing a number of GEF-IW projects. Amongst these projects are those in the
Upper Paraguay River Basin--aimed at the formulation of a Watershed Management Program for the
basin, the Sao Francisco River Basin--aimed at developing a Strategic Action Program for the basin,
and the Guarani Aquifer region--aimed at the formulation of an action framework for this
transboundary aquifer. The SRH was the host of the Fourth Inter-American Dialogue for Water
Resources Management (Dialogue IV) where the authorities and institutions involved in water
management, together with key stakeholders and international organisations (including the GEF
Secretariat and Implementing Agencies), discussed water resources issues and initiatives in the
Americas. As a member of the IWRN, and since the Secretary of Water Resources is currently its co-
chairman, Brazil is committed to strengthening the IWRN. Likewise, given Brazil's participation in
GEF-IW projects spanning a range of GEF-IW Operational Programs (OPs), the SRH is committed to
building the synergy between these complementary functions. To this end, this MSP is one
mechanism to catalyse this synergy.
14.
Information on proposed executing agency:
International Executing Agency: General Secretariat of the Organisation of American States
(OAS). The OAS is the premier forum for multilateral dialogue and decision-making in the
Americas. It aims at strengthening democracy and at promoting peace, understanding, and
collaboration amongst its 34 member states. As a result of global and hemispheric summits, the
OAS has demonstrated strong leadership in promoting participatory sustainable development, with
the close collaboration of its member states and civil society representatives. The Unit for
Sustainable Development and Environment (USDE) of the OAS, which will be responsible for the
overall management of the project, is widely acknowledged as a successful environmental
management agency at the hemispheric level. Its connection on the political level with various
specialised bodies of the OAS, both at headquarters and in terms of technical co-operation in
environmental management within the member states, facilitates its role as a bridge between the
public and private sectors, civil society, and water resources professionals. Within the OAS, the
USDE serves as a mechanism for the exchange of information and experiences in development
and the environment, a role that has been demonstrated with the successful implementation and
operation of the IWRN during its formative years. In addition, the USDE executes several GEF-
IW projects on behalf of The World Bank and UNEP, as well as numerous projects for USAID and
other agencies. Currently, there is a US $ 42 million portfolio of projects under execution, a US $
13 million portfolio in the final stage of negotiation, and an US $ 8.6 million portfolio of projects
in the early stages of development and preparation. Given its historic involvement with both the
IWRN and the GEF-IW focal area within the Latin America and Caribbean region, and added
experience in water resources projects on behalf of other agencies, the USDE of the OAS is well
placed to execute the day-to-day activities of the project.
Local Executing Agency: Secretariat of Water Resources of the Ministry of Environment/Brazil
in close consultation with the other endorsing countries. See below implementation plan section.
15. Date of initial submission of project concept: December 2000
16. Project Identification number: tbd
17. Implementing Agency contact person: Ahmed Djoghlaf, Executive Co-ordinator, UNEP
GEF Coordination Office, Nairobi, Kenya
18. Project linkage to Implementing Agency program(s):
The proposed actions are consistent with the UNEP Environmentally Sound Management of
7
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Inland Waters (EMINWA) integrated watershed management planning process and related,
regional seas programme. Within Latin American and the Caribbean, UNEP is the GEF
Implementing Agency for four International Waters projects, including those in the Sao Francisco
and Upper Paraguay River basins in Brazil, the Bermejo River Basin in Bolivia and Argentina, and
the San Juan River Basin in Costa Rica and Nicaragua. In addition, UNEP has a long-term
participation in the IWRN, providing some of the initial funding for its implementation and
operation during its formative years. This MSP proposal continues the partnership with the OAS in
catalysing an holistic approach to watershed management in Latin America and the Caribbean by
developing the obvious synergy between the IWRN, the GEF-IW projects, and the EMINWA
approach. It is consistent with the strategy of the Division of Early Warning and Assessment
(DEWA) to develop Environmental Information Networks, as a key element in UNEP Programme
of Work, to facilitate the collection, exchange, and dissemination of environmental data and
information between countries and regions. It also is consistent with DEWA's mandate to catalyse
the collaborative assessment of key environmental issues related to sustainable development, so as
to improve international policy formulation and planning, raise public awareness, and further
strengthen human and institutional capacities for environmental management. In addition to the
IWRN, examples of UNEP-established networks include: ENRIN--a network designed to
promote development of national and sub-regional capacities in environmental data and
information management to support State-of-the-Environment (SoE) and issue-based assessments
by partner institutions; the GEO global network of Collaborating Centres--a co-ordinated, global
network of regional, multidisciplinary institutes conducting integrated assessments and forecasts
and providing scientific guidance for regional and international policy setting and action planning;
the Climate Impacts and Response Strategies Network (CIRSNet)--a network of government focal
points exchanging information and experiences on climate change impacts and responses; and,
INFOTERRA--the global environmental information exchange network that operates through a
system of 176 government-designated national focal points. At the national level, INFOTERRA
focal points provide a wide range of environmental information products and services including
environmental bibliographies; directories of sources of information; query-response services;
environmental awareness leaflets; and access to Internet services. UNEP is also an active
participant in the development of the water resources best management practices data base element
of the IW:LEARN project.
8
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES
The proposed project, "Development and Implementation of Mechanisms to Disseminate
Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Integrated Transboundary Water Resources Management
in Latin America and the Caribbean", aims to promote South-to-South learning, develop and
implement mechanisms to disseminate the lessons being learned in GEF International Waters-
related (GEF-IW) projects in Latin America and the Caribbean, and improve capacity to
integrated water resources management. This Medium Size Project (MSP) will assist the
International Waters-Learn (IW:LEARN) project of UNDP in the implementation of its mandate
to improve communications and outreach between countries world-wide. This project would
serve as a demonstration project using Latin America and the Caribbean as a privileged site to
illustrate how systematic exchange of project experiences, lessons learned, and best practices can
improve integrated water resources management. Specifically, the project will strengthen and
improve mechanisms for the dissemination of information and lessons learned from GEF-IW
projects and other experiences in integrated water resources management within the Latin
America and Caribbean region. With at least eight active GEF International Waters (GEF-IW)
projects being executed in the Latin American and Caribbean region (Annex I), this project is a
timely and useful complement to existing water management programs in the region. The
dissemination of information and lessons learned from GEF-IW and other relevant water
resources management projects in the region, through an efficient information network, will
contribute to enhancing capacity of water authority and river-basin organisation staffs in
improving and implementing water resources management practices in the region.
To date, the dissemination of lessons learned during and after the execution of GEF-IW projects
in the region is restricted largely to the geographic areas where the projects were executed. Thus,
there is significant scope for more widely disseminating the experiences and lessons learned in a
manner that could benefit future initiatives throughout the region. Both successes and failures
constitute important opportunities to improve the integrated water resources management.
In disseminating appropriate information, existing regional communication mechanisms and
networks--such as the Inter-American Water Resources Network (IWRN), the Latin American
Network of River Basin Organisations (LANBO), SIDSNet, and IW:LEARN--could contribute
significantly to this process, once a process is defined to facilitate information transfer. Indeed,
by integrating the GEF-IW-LAC projects'experiences, lessons learned, and best practices into the
IWRN, a broader community of decision-makers and policy-makers throughout the LAC region
can be reached. Government representations in the IWRN, through countries National Focal
Points appointed through the OAS Permanent Missions, strengthen the likelihood that these
experiences, lessons learned, and best practices positively influence water policies in the LAC
region. Further, not only the LAC region can benefit from the tools and mechanisms already
developed by IW-LEARN, but IW-LEARN can also disseminate LAC experience throughout
other GEF regions. As witnessed during DIALOGUE IV, in a collaborative effort between
IWRN, GEF-IW LAC projects, IW-LEARN, OAS and UNEP, more than thirty project managers
from nine GEF-IW-LAC projects exchanged information, experiences, and lessons learned prior
to (in e-forum) and during the Fourth Inter-American Dialogue on Water Management, held in
Brazil from September 2 to 6, 2001. This process was designed to construct relationships,
exchange information, identify appropriate mechanisms to manage and share this information,
and determine a means of continuing this process of information sharing and dissemination. The
audience was unanimous in saying that time was ripe for a comprehensive mechanism/process
9
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
for ensuring that the experience and knowledge gained so far in water resources management be
shared (see Annexes V and VI). In addition, prior to and during the Dialogue IV, IWRN
National Focal Points gathered to discuss the creation and strengthening of fora and the
establishment of virtual fora for selected sub-regions in LAC. With funding from the Multilateral
Special Fund of the OAS Inter-American Council for Integral Development (FEMCIDI), the
establishment of five sub-regional fora is under way. These fora would allow for the integration
of all OAS participating member countries in the GEF-IW-LAC forum.
The presence of representatives from the different countries within the region at the IV Dialogue
provided an opportunity to strengthen the role of the IWRN and its ancillary networks in the
region prior to the Fourth Water Information Summit (held in Panama, October 2001).
Additionally, as a network of networks, IWRN and its ancillary networks can act as a tool in
facilitating the incorporation of experiences to date in GEF-IW and in other relevant water
resources management projects into the existing policies and management practices for
improving the overall capacity of water resources managers on a regional and sub-regional basis.
The outcome of Dialogue IV, and the experiences gained in the operation of a refined IWRN, can
provide necessary input for other major international water resources management meetings (e.g.
the "Third World Water Forum", to be held in Kyoto during 2003). All of these meetings
constitute important fora for exchange and dissemination of experiences and results from, inter
alia, GEF-IW projects.
Brazil, as the host country for Dialogue IV, is well positioned to co-ordinate a regional
discussion of information dissemination and exchange with respect to GEF-IW projects. Brazil
currently is involved in the execution of four GEF-IW projects--in the Sao Francisco, Upper
Paraguay, Putumayo river basins and Guarani Aquifer--and, hence, has first hand knowledge of
the nature and conduct of GEF-IW projects in the region. As these projects, as well as the other
GEF-IW projects in the region, have achieved a level of maturity where information sharing
would be useful and beneficial to each of the projects, Dialogue IV provided a unique
opportunity for the conduct of discussions designed to facilitate such information sharing. Such
discussions not only benefited existing GEF-IW projects in the region but also contributed to the
establishment of a sustainable mechanism for consultation and co-operation in the fields of
watershed and coastal management and information technology.
This proposal, based upon GEF-IW OP 10, specifically addresses the short-term objectives of
"dissemination of lessons learned from ongoing projects, and sharing of learning experiences and
best management practices, within groups of countries co-operating on transboundary water
projects." It aims to catalyse a process that can be replicated through the IW:LEARN project and
related initiatives of UNEP (IW Best Practices Database) and the GEF, using Latin America and
the Caribbean as a privileged site within which to develop the necessary approaches,
mechanisms, and infrastructure.
CURRENT SITUATION
The Summit for Sustainable Development of the Americas, held in Santa Cruz de la Sierra,
Bolivia, during December 1996 (the Bolivia Summit), was a follow-up to the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, or the Rio Conference--the primary
output of which was the framework for action known as Agenda 21). The Bolivia Summit was
aimed at defining strategies for implementing Agenda 21 in the Americas. During this Summit,
the heads of state of Latin American and Caribbean countries approved the Plan of Action for
10
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Sustainable Development in the Americas. Chapter IV of this document sets forth initiatives on
water resources and coastal areas. The OAS was charged with the responsibility of identifying
progress in the implementation of these initiatives through a hemispheric consultation process.
Progress toward implementation, as well as constraints, was documented in the report entitled,
"Status and Proposed Actions to Continue the Implementation of the Initiatives on Water
Resources and Coastal Areas of the Plan of Action for the Sustainable Development of the
Americas." This report recommended the creation of a partnership amongst countries,
international multilateral organisations, and NGOs to increase efforts in the management of water
resources, including initiation of specific actions to facilitate a consultative process for the
implementation of the initiatives identified at the Bolivia Summit.
The initiatives recommended were complemented with the "Inter-American Strategy for the
Promotion of Public Participation in decision Making for Sustainable Development" (ISP),
affirmed by the Inter-American Committee on Sustainable Development (CIDS), and aimed at
improving living conditions through economic growth, with social equity. The ISP is predicated
upon sustainable consumption patterns and an ecological equilibrium that includes a commitment
to the integrated management of the region's water resources. The approval of the ISP is an
important mechanism to support the implementation of integrated water resources management
in Latin American and the Caribbean.
Previously, during 1993, water experts, water authorities, and representatives of academia, the
private sector, and NGOs, in the Americas, established a periodic consultative mechanism known
as the Inter-American Dialogue on Water Management. The initial meeting of the Dialogue was
held in Miami, with subsequent meetings being held in Buenos Aires and Panama. These
Dialogues have been important fora for the discussion of water resources management practices
and the establishment of basic linkages to develop and strengthen a regional understanding of
water management. These Dialogues also have enabled a periodic evaluation of the achievements
and the lessons learned.
The Inter-American Water Resources Network (IWRN) was a direct and practical outcome of
Dialogue I. Established in 1994 with funding from UNEP and the OAS, and with the OAS as
technical secretariat, the IWRN is comprised of 34 member countries, each having appointed
national focal points. The Mission of the IWRN is to promote education and the open exchange
of information and technical expertise, and to enhance communication, co-operation,
collaboration, and financial commitment to the implementation of integrated water and land
resources management within the context of environmental and economic sustainability in the
Americas.
Despite the relative abundance of water in the Americas, it is unevenly distributed and subject to
localised pollution problems. Some areas face severe drought, while others face restrictions due
to water quality problems, even in those areas where water is available in quantity. Integrated
land and water resources management at the river-basin level provides an important tool for
addressing such issues at the different scales at which they occur. Nevertheless, difficulties arise
in dealing with differing, and potentially conflicting, stakeholder interests, even in countries
where federal or national legislation sets general policies. In such situations, at the watershed-
scale, stakeholders not only include water users in the various economic sectors, but also in
potentially competing riparian administrative units (e.g., states, provinces, and/or departments).
Information and availability of information are critical elements in reconciling such divergent
viewpoints.
11
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Differing interests and viewpoints arise, in part, as a result of the rapid economic growth being
experienced within the region, and, particularly, in the headwater areas of the two main
transboundary river basins in South America, the Plata River and Amazon River Basins. These
areas form the new agricultural frontier, often being exploited with heavy machinery supported
by large quantities of agrochemicals that affect water quality. Growing populations add to
increased urbanisation and water consumption within these basins, which already support
"Megacities" such as São Paulo (BR), Assunción (PA), Santa Fe (AR), and Buenos Aires (AR).
In Central America, the San Juan River Basin faces similar conflicts arising from water uses,
while, on the islands of the Caribbean, management of freshwater faces competing demands from
both agriculture and tourismthe two principal sources of foreign exchange.
Superimposed on these competing economic pressures, there are increased social and societal
pressures on the water resources in the region resulting from increased public interest in
participation in water resources management. In several countries, communities are organising
themselves to participate in the decision-making process by creating river basin associations,
holding local meetings, publishing newsletters, and developing activities with children and other
community level stakeholders. As with economic development issues, information and
availability of information are critical elements in promoting effective community involvement in
integrated water resources management.
Several initiatives to promote integrated water resources management are under way, several of
which are funded in part with funds provided through the GEF-IW OPs. Nevertheless, the region
continues to face serious challenges with regard to dispersed administrative responsibilities that
involve multiple institutions, many lacking adequate resources to properly carry out their
functions; accelerated deterioration of surface and groundwater quality and quantity; inadequate
and incompatible legal systems, and land and water management practices and policies; and poor
participation by stakeholders and interest groups in decision-making. Despite the commonality of
these problems between river basins, approaches and solutions are largely being developed on a
case-by-case basis with little interchange of experiences and outcomes between basins or
stakeholders. Again, information and availability of information are critical elements in
catalysing sustainable management of the region's water resources. However, in addition,
capacity is often lost, or weakened following the completion of these local initiatives owing to
the lack of sustained technical support and access to the information needed that might not have
been absorbed or provided during the project period.
The present project proposal will take advantage of (1) the potential synergy (see Annex VI)
between the ISP, the GEF-IW projects and other integrated water resources initiatives in the
region, as well as with IW:LEARN and IWRN and (2) of the opportunity provided by Dialogue
IV, to strengthen the IWRN as a tool for capacity building and dissemination of information in
Latin America and the Caribbean. Through the refined IWRN, links with other networks (e.g.
SIDSNet, LANBO,...) will provide a basis for the broad exchange of information within the
region and at the global scale, consistent with the mission of the GEF and its Implementing
Agencies. Such a goal also is consistent with that of the World Water Vision, and the river basin
approach to integrated land and water resources management elaborated at the Second World
Water Form held in the Hague during March 2000. It also addresses in part the concerns voiced
by GEF-IW project participants at the First Biennial Water Conference held during October 2000
in Budapest.
12
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
EXPECTED PROJECT OUTCOMES
With the implementation of the present project, it is expected that Latin American and Caribbean
countries, and especially river-basin organisations, national water authorities and water
stakeholders, will have an increased understanding and capacity to address properly the technical,
social, legal, and ecological issues facing water resources management in the region. Such
capacity and understanding is predicated upon access to, and exchange of, information, on an on-
going network basis. The Virtual Forum of IWRN, to be developed as a result of the discussions
and decisions taken at Dialogue IV, will strengthen the regional information system to help
countries address their common difficulties in implementing effective, integrated land and water
management practices. A redesigned and strengthened IWRN will not only continue as the
principal hemispheric communication tool for integrated water resources management in the
region, but will also broaden access to the IWRN platform and better inform water resources
management communities both in the Americas and world-wide.
It is also expected that lessons learned and best management practices developed from the GEF-
IW projects within the region, once available electronically to all stakeholders, will result in an
increased capacity of, and community-driven demand for, water management organisations and
river basin authorities to adopt new practices. Participation in international meetings on water
issues can facilitate the incorporation of integrated water resources management approaches into
national policies as well as increase the potential for information and experience exchanges.
River basin master plans can be discussed through the Virtual Fora, leading to the publication of
a set of guidelines resulting from these discussions. In addition, the exchange of experiences
within Latin America and the Caribbean, related to the use of electronic networks like the IWRN,
at international meetings on integrated water management, will result in a strengthened
collaboration globally amongst riparian countries on integrated water resources management
issues. As noted above, the outcomes of this project are specifically intended to be presented and
discussed during the major forthcoming global and international water events (e.g. Third World
Water Forum meeting).
It is also anticipated that lessons learned and best management practices developed from the
GEF-IW projects within the region as well as any other outcome of this project will benefit
IW:LEARN in general and specifically its best practices database component implemented by
UNEP. Indeed this project would act as an IW:LEARN demonstration/pilot project using Latin
America and the Caribbean as a privileged site to illustrate the functioning of a knowledge
exchange network system. In doing so this Medium Size Project would provide IW:LEARN with
a model for parallel activities in other region thereby leveraging the experience gained in LAC to
benefit GEF-IW activities world-wide building a larger system of global knowledge sharing.
At the country and local levels, it is envisioned that the IWRN National Focal Points will
continue to be especially involved in the project, since they are the primary liaison between the
project and the water community in each country. Their involvement will be ensured through
Virtual Fora and, when necessary, periodic special meetings.
ACTIVITIES AND FINANCIAL INPUTS:
The five Components proposed in this project (see Annex II) were identified through a
consultative process conducted within the region. These Components address identified needs
related to information on water management, and take advantage of the opportunities for
discussion provided by Dialogue IV. This project is indeed a logical follow-up to GEF-IW-LAC
e-forum (July and August 2001), prior to a complementary 2-day face to face meeting at the
13
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
margins of DIALOGUE IV (September 2001) where over 30 GEF-IW project managers and
technical co-ordinators in the LAC region have recently expressed their interest in sharing best
practices and lessons learned in water resources management.
Component 1 - Foster dialogue amongst GEF-IW and other related water resource
management projects in LAC establishing a mechanism to share recent accomplishments,
experiences from the planning and management of IW projects, lessons learned, and best
practices.
The objective of this Component is not only to facilitate communication amongst and between
GEF-IW project managers in order to address common concerns, but also to develop a
mechanism whereby they can meet with government officials, local authorities, and stakeholders
to discuss the strategies for incorporating lessons learned in water resources management
practices and policies. Five activities comprise this Component:
Special sub-regional meetings, in follow-up to Dialogue IV meeting (Brazil - September
2001), will initiate the process, which then will be continued through Virtual Fora, integrated
into a refined Inter-American Water Resources Network (IWRN).
The IWRN will be redesigned as a more user-friendly network that will contribute to
enhanced information exchange amongst water resources authorities and river basin
authorities in the region. These actions will make the IWRN a fast and reliable
communications tool with a much broader range. Smaller communities, river basin authorities
serving smaller river basins, and identified stakeholders will easily access water resources
information.
Virtual Fora will be established in the first instance to initiate this process, building upon the
results of Dialogue IV. The Fora will be utilised, as appropriate, to obtain information on
specific discussion points, leading to the formation of thematic centres of excellence and will
provide a mechanism to refine and enhance the role of the IWRN. GEF-IW projects
managers, IWRN focal points, river basin organisations, national water authorities, together
with a variety of selected water stakeholders in LAC will form the audience of such e-fora.
As a result of both the face to face meetings and the Virtual Fora, a comprehensive
document/brochure and CD in the four OAS languages outlining water resources practices
and lessons learned in the Americas, will be prepared and disseminated inter alia at the Third
World Water Forum and related meetings.
In order to further foster lessons learned, best practices and knowledge sharing, project
encountering similar environments will be twinned (e.g. The Sao Francisco and the San Juan
projects, Bermejo and Maritime Front projects).
The results of the discussions will provide potential inputs for discussion at major forthcoming
water events (e.g. Third World Water Forum).
The results of the discussion will also provide potential inputs for IW:LEARN and its Best
Practices Database component implemented by UNEP for parallel activities in other GEF regions
thereby leveraging the experience gained in LAC to benefit GEF-IW activities world-wide
building a larger system of global knowledge sharing.
GEF: US $ 438,200; co-funding: US $ 359,000; total: US $ 797,200.
14
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Component 2. - Foster the inclusion of lessons learned and best practices into water
resources management practices.
The objective of this Component is to develop a framework within which the experience acquired
during the execution of GEF-IW projects can be shared and disseminated so as to minimise
problems and issues of concern through improved communication and information-sharing. The
outcome of this Component will include shared experiences and inclusion of lessons learned into
routine water management practices in the region. Two activities comprise this Component:
Specific guidelines for inclusion of best practices and lessons learned into policies and
regulations will be developed and utilised in the formulation of new water resources
management activities. These guidelines will be developed in close consultation with
IW:LEARN and specifically with the Best Practices Database component implemented by
UNEP.
Three regional training workshops will be conducted with a view to promoting the inclusion
of lessons learned and best practices in the formulation of new activities.
GEF: US $ 122,700; co-funding: US $ 39,000; total: US $ 161,700.
Component 3- Strengthening of the IWRN as the principal hemispheric communication
tool for integrated water resources management.
The objective of this Component is to develop specific processes for sharing and disseminating
experiences and lessons learned from GEF-IW projects in Latin America and the Caribbean. The
output of this Component will include Internet as well as other media, that will be identified,
tested and refined for future use, with appropriate linkages to other networks and information
systems and a sustainable financial and knowledge base. A strengthened and actively used
IWRN, capable of meeting the needs of the stakeholder community, will be the principal result of
this Component. This Component is comprised of six activities:
A framework will be developed within which a strategic program will be identified to
strengthen the IWRN as a hemispheric communication tool for integrated land and water
resources management.
The IWRN web site will be redesigned as an interactive metadata site, ensuring information
exchange rather than just information dissemination, using protocols for searching, accessing
and acquiring information and data, enhancing its dialogue function.
Sub-regional nodes will be established and equipped within Brazil and possibly as well
within the potentially selected Thematic Centers of Excellence, as pilot sites, to test the
refined IWRN website and related communications tools.
A workshop to assess the needs for training and equipping of water resources professionals
and NGOs will be convened within Brazil, a result of which will be the development and
implementation of a program of training where needed to promote access to, and use of, the
IWRN by water resources professionals and NGOs.
Assistance will be provided to the countries of Latin American and the Caribbean in securing
financing for the establishment of up to five IWRN sub-regional nodes within the Americas.
Each of the nodes will be selected according to their specific area of expertise and will be
developed into Centres of Excellence based upon their specific area of emphasis as shown in
Annex I.
15
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Linkages between IWRN and other regional and sub-regional networks (e.g. SIDSNet,
LANBO,...) involved in water resources management will be identified and established.
Specific links to IW:LEARN will be established as this project is acting as a pilot site for
IW:LEARN in general and specifically for its Best Practices Database component
implemented by UNEP.
GEF: US $ 178,500; co-funding: US $ 189,000; total: US $ 367,500.
Component 4 - Involve civil society according to principles set forth in the Inter-American
Strategy for Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making (ISP).
The objective of this Component is to facilitate access to the IWRN by civil society, as a specific
stakeholder within the region, pursuant to the principals of the ISP. The outputs will include a
meeting of IWRN focal points leading to the formulation of a strategy for the inclusion of the ISP
principals within the information dissemination process. The results of this Component will be
enhanced participation by civil society in water resources management and decision-making.
Two activities comprise this Component:
A special meeting of GEF-IW and other water resources management project managers and
ISP focal points will be convened to facilitate the inclusion of the principles of the ISP in
water resources management projects, and help to reduce misunderstandings and conflicts
through proper consultation with the civil society.
Five sub-regional and/or national (one in each of the sub-regions of the Americas) nodes
through which civil society can access the IWRN will be identified and established in order to
test the principals of ISP within the IWRN framework.
GEF: US $ 143,800; co-funding US $ 39,000; total: US $ 182,800.
Component 5 - Monitoring and Evaluation.
The objective of this Component is to ensure the implementation of the project and the
achievement of its intended outcomes through a process of identifying and monitoring project
progress, not only in terms of financial disbursements but also in terms of information distributed
and knowledge transferred between GEF-IW projects and other projects in the region. The output
will include regular monitoring reports. The results of this Component will be increased
dissemination and utilisation of information throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. This
Component is comprised of one activity:
In addition to the monitoring and evaluation activities exercised by the GEF Implementing
Agency, and in addition to the day-to-day monitoring of activities by the OAS as the
Executing Agency, UNEP in consultation with the OAS will co-ordinate a mid-term and final
evaluation of the project.
GEF: US $ 16,800; co-funding: US $ 39,000; total: US $ 55,800.
SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS AND RISK ASSESSMENT.
Most countries in the region have several water resources management activities looking as well
into integrated river basin and coastal zone management as in progress. Enhancing the
communication mechanisms for a more efficient exchange of information and experience will
complement this effort as recently recognised as a crucial need by the GEF-IW-LAC project
16
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
managers as well as by a large number of participating countries in the September 2001
DIALOGUE IV meeting (see annex V). Thus, many of the concepts and approaches proposed
herein have been proven to have minimal risk and a high potential for sustainability.
While many countries have participated, and continue to participate, in the IWRN, as a
mechanism for information sharing and dissemination, there is a continuing risk that no single
country will adopt the regional network. Thus, there is a moderate risk that the IWRN will be
under-staffed and under-budgeted, leading to an ongoing need for external finance and support.
Notwithstanding, the involvement of local communities in GEF-IW activities has greatly
advanced the participation of stakeholders in integrated river-basin and coastal zone management
in the region. While there is a risk of conflict due to competing demands, and to overlapping,
inter-governmental jurisdictions and mandates, the successful resolution of such conflicts in
specific projects suggests minimal risk. Indeed, this project will strengthen the process of
stakeholder involvement, and facilitate negotiations to establish new mechanisms for stakeholder
involvement and consolidate existing ones. In the longer term, this process will depend on the
establishment of national or regional water resources management systems. Many governments
are reviewing existing national water laws and regulations--or planning to adopt new ones--and
better legal support, predicated upon sound information and sharing of experiences as proposed
herein, will strengthen the implementation of integrated transboundary river-basin management
systems. Nevertheless, political will, at all levels, is required to ensure that this project prospers
and that the outcomes of the project are fully integrated into planning methodologies for
integrated land and water resources management.
It is expected that the governments will maintain and increase efforts to improve water
management, by strengthening the institutional framework, improving information exchange, and
integrating their related legal frameworks, thereby minimising risk and promoting sustainability.
The Brazilian IWRN node will be an important tool to strengthen the "National Water
Management Information System", which is being implemented. Once fully operational, this
system will provide the long-term sustainability of the IWRN regional node. The demand for
information on water resources management practices is growing steadily, and is likely to
continue to grow, due to the growing number of river basin organisations that are being created
and stakeholder initiatives being developed.
STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT
The proposed, enhanced communication system will allow a fast flow of information and easy
access for civil society at any level of political organisation. This will enhance the ability of
stakeholders to interact effectively with water authorities and river-basin organisation managers
(locally, nationally and internationally). In the first instance, NGOs, such as The Citizenship
Movement for Water in Brazil, will be identified as potential partners in a broader process to
evaluate and share the lessons learned with other similar groups to be identified in the Americas
through GEF-IW projects. For the purpose of the pilot demonstration project proposed herein, a
small coordination secretariat and local focal point will be established in up to five selected
medium- and small-sized cities, as provided in Component 4. The focal points, to be selected in a
manner consistent with the ISP, will normally be local organisations committed to and concerned
about water management procedures. Building upon these citizen-based linkages in the
information system, meetings between representatives of community organisations and water
resource agencies are planned to encourage citizens to express their views and propose means to
make their participation more effective. At Dialogue IV, a meeting was organised by a Brazilian
17
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
NGO involved in water resources management, including several Latin American water
management authorities and NGOs, to discuss strategies for applying ISP principles and
incorporating the lessons learned during the GEF-IW projects locally. In addition, the Dialogue
IV meeting provided a focus for the distribution of media releases by water-oriented NGOs,
dissemination of water resources information to the public and press through established media
outlets, and a means of highlighting the role of stakeholders in water resources management. The
participants at Dialogue IV formed the core group of interested organisations and authorities that
will be committed to this initiative.
INCREMENTAL COST ASSESSMENT
The goal of the present proposal is to promote integrated water resources management in the
transboundary river basins of the Americas. The project will accomplish this goal by identifying
and communicating lessons learned during GEF-IW project development and execution,
improving involvement of the public in the decision-making process through enhanced access to
information, and improving communication amongst all stakeholders through networking.
As noted above, many governments are currently undertaking such actions at the national level to
promote improved, integrated water resources management. Nevertheless, because of the local
focus of the majority of these efforts, opportunities for creating synergy between projects, and
sharing approaches and outcomes across river basin boundaries, are not being fully utilised.
Examples of the local investment considered as baseline for this project include funds that Brazil
allocated to the preparation of Dialogue IV. Additionally, the National Water Resources
Information System, implemented in Brazil during August 2000, provides an example of country-
level initiatives complementary to this regional project. In Central America, country support to
the Central American Committee on Water Resources (CRRH) indicates a similar strong and
clear political will of countries to implement integrated water resources management based upon
sound technical information within the region.
This project is designed to provide funds to meet the incremental cost of disseminating
information and experiences throughout the region, thereby enhancing not only local knowledge
and participation, but also meeting the GEF-IW objectives of contributing to the global
knowledge base on the management of transboundary waters.
The incremental benefits to be achieved through the conduct of this project can be grouped into
four broad areas, each approximately corresponding to the four major operational Components of
this project. In each, the additional benefits to be achieved with GEF funding include a wider
dissemination of information and experiences, leading to strengthened regional capacities for
water resources management as a direct consequence of information-sharing facilitated through
the meetings and information networks proposed herein. The fifth Component of this project,
monitoring and evaluation, is wholly incremental in nature.
Component 1 - Foster dialogue amongst GEF-IW and other related water resource
management projects in LAC establishing a mechanism to share recent accomplishments,
experiences from the planning and management of IW projects, lessons learned, and best
practices: Improved knowledge about transboundary river-basin management practices and
experiences is expected to result from the dissemination of the documents prepared in
conjunction with this proposal. These documents will provide a basis for the initial dissemination
of the results of the technical meetings, and are to be produced in a format compatible with the
IWRN document transmission system. These documents will be accessible to a wide audience of
18
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
water resources professionals and interested parties and stakeholders, thereby initiating the
regional sharing of information designed into this project.
Component 2. - Foster the inclusion of lessons learned and best practices into water
resources management practices: Discussion and evaluation of the lessons learned in the
several GEF-IW projects in the region, and incorporation of their results into project management
procedures and practices, will strengthen the capacity of country and local level staff and
stakeholders to effectively implement and maintain sound water resources planning programs.
This will make management practices more efficient, while enhancing interaction among the
staffs of the different organisations, strengthening both local and regional co-operation.
Component 3- Strengthening of the IWRN as the principal hemispheric communication
tool for integrated water resources management: A strengthened and actively used IWRN,
capable of meeting the needs of the stakeholder community will promote the exchange of
experiences and lessons learned amongst users and ultimately improve water management
policies and practices throughout the region and world-wide.
Component 4 - Involve civil society according to principles set forth in the Inter-American
Strategy for Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making (ISP): Experience
acquired in transboundary river-basin management will not only improve the management of
river basins but will also enhance transparency and the ability of stakeholders to participate in the
decision-making process. In addition, the strengthening of communications among water
authorities and river-basin organisations will facilitate information transfer among the projects
under execution, and potentially to other transboundary basins where complex issues of conflict
among different groups of stakeholders exist. The present proposal will permit the participation
of IWRN focal points and other speakers in the preparation of basic documents, and the
preparation of the meeting proceedings. While activities related to the IWRN are ongoing due to
the efforts of the OAS as the technical secretariat, and the Centre for Environmental Studies of
the University of Miami as the WebMaster, the present proposal improves communication and
allows for the redesign the WebPage to introduce new links and information scheme partners that
will contribute to achieving the IWRN's mission, consistent with that of the GEF-IW focal area.
19
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Incremental Cost Matrix (US $)
Component
Category
Amount
Domestic Benefits
Global Benefits
Foster dialogue amongst GEF-IW and other
Baseline
359,000 Information on water resources available
related water resource management projects in
within each project area
LAC establishing a mechanism to share recent
Alternative
797,200 Same as above, with additional
Increased protection and sustainable use of
accomplishments, experiences from the
information supporting the sustainable use
water systems based upon shared
planning and management of IW projects,
of the resource within the wider region
experiences and dissemination of lessons
lessons learned, and best practices
learned and best practices; increased
efficiencies based upon reduced learning
curves for project teams.
Improved GEF-IW activities world-wide.
Improved system of global knowledge
sharing.
Increment 438,200
Foster the inclusion of lessons learned and best
Baseline
39,000 Limited dissemination and implementation
practices into water resources management
of sustainable development concepts and
practices
measures
Alternative
161,700 Same as above, with added capacity for
Positive impacts of co-ordinated water
improved, sustainable water management
management, and development of
and decision-making
methodologies able to be applied to other
international basins; increased
dissemination of project outputs
Increment 122,700
Strengthening of the IWRN as the principal
Baseline
189,000 Public awareness of water conservation
hemispheric communication tool for integrated
and public health issues
water resources management
Alternative
367,500 Same as above, with public support for
Positive impacts of co-ordinated water
appropriate development, utilisation and
management, and development of
conservation of water
programs able to be applied to other
international basins; greater public and
stakeholder access to IWRN-based
information
Increment 178,500
20
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Component
Category
Amount
Domestic Benefits
Global Benefits
Involve civil society according to principles set
Baseline
39,000 Public awareness of water conservation
forth in the Inter-American Strategy for Public
and public participation in water
Participation in Environmental Decision
management
Making (ISP)
Alternative
182,800 Same as above, with public support for
Positive impacts of co-ordinated water
appropriate development, utilisation and
management, and development of
conservation of water resources
programs able to be applied to other
international basins; increase public
participation in resource management
Increment 143,800
Project Monitoring and Evaluation
Baseline
39,000 Operation of country-based water
information systems
Alternative
55,800 Same as above, with added capacity to
Increased protection of water quality and
regulate water uses in a co-ordinated and
quantity with resultant potential benefit to
sustainable manner
regional biological diversity and
maintenance of water resources
Increment
16,800
Project Coordination and Management
Baseline
- - a - -a
Alternative*
72,000 Same as above
Development of methodologies for
coordination of management and
monitoring of multinational water systems;
enhanced project management and
increased efficiencies
Increment
72,000
TOTAL Baseline
665,000
(Including Co-
financing*)
Alternative*
1,637,000
Increment
972,000
PDF Preparation
- -
Total Increment
972,000
aIn the absence of a GEF intervention, no cost is accrued for project monitoring and evaluation; costs incurred for monitoring and evaluation of the project, therefore, are wholly incremental.
*Co-financing is provided by the Government of Brazil in the amount of US $ 470,000 (in cash and in kind), the General Secretariat of the Organisation of American States in the amount of US $ 100,000 (in kind), and
the United Nations Environment Programme in the amount of US $ 95,000 (in kind).
21
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
BUDGET
PROJECT BUDGET IN US$
Component
GEF
BRAZIL
OAS
UNEP
TOTAL
PDF:
N/A
Personnel:
· Technical Co-ordinator 72,000
(18 p/m)
· Local Technical
229,600
301,600
Expertise **
Contracts with local
222,800 220,000
100,000*
542,800
experienced entities **.
Travel/Training/Meetings:
392,600 100,000
95,000*
587,600
Equipment (hardware and
15,000
150,000*
165,000
software):
Administrative costs
40,000
40,000
Project total
972,000
470,000
100,000
95,000
1,637,000
* = in kind
** = Maximum amount to be split amongst as many local experts and experienced entities as
possible as decided during project implementation.
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The project duration is estimated to be 22 months. The proposed project will be directed by a
Project Steering Committee composed of seven members--one member each representing the
Brazilian Agency for International Co-operation (ABC), Secretariat of Water Resources
(SRH/MMA), National Water Agency (ANA), UNEP, the General Secretariat of the OAS, the
IWRN Secretariat, and the IW:LEARN project. For cost effectiveness, in the Steering Group,
Brazil will act on behalf of the other LAC countries. A virtual technical committee will be
established with each participating country nominating a technical focal point such as its national
IWRN focal point. These technical focal points representing at the inception of the project all
endorsing countries and later on possibly any selected constituencies as decided, would be
included via network linkages in a virtual steering committee. In addition, the project would
maintain a physical presence in Brazil, wherefrom all coordination activities would be
implemented. The other GEF Implementing Agencies, will be informed of meetings of the
Steering Committee, and may participate in an ex-officio capacity. The project Steering
Committee, at its first meeting to be convened after the project has been approved by the GEF,
will be chaired by the SRH/MMA, in its capacity of the local Executing Agency. A Technical
Co-ordinator, contracted with project funds will be selected in close consultation with all LAC
countries focal points participating in this project, the OAS and UNEP, and will be working from
Brazil (SRH/MMA). The Steering Committee will decide upon administrative and reporting
procedures consistent with UNEP standards and OAS requirements for financial reporting. The
Steering Committee will also endorse the institutional arrangement, the workplan and budget and
any subsequent required revisions. The refined workplan and budget based on the information
presented in this proposal will be prepared by the SRH/MMA in close consultation with the other
LAC participating countries, and with UNEP and the OAS for presentation at the first Steering
22
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Committee meeting prior to the initiation of the project activities. Finally, the Steering
Committee, at its inaugural meeting, will conduct any other business that may be required to
initiate project activities, and set a date for the second meeting. The Steering Committee will
schedule its meetings at least every six months and will be supported by the host country and
with funds provided by GEF through the Implementing Agency. UNEP and the OAS will support
project execution.
OAS will act as Executing Agency and manage the funds provided to the project by UNEP, on
behalf of GEF, consistent with UNEP and OAS budgetary and financial rules. The activities will
be based upon preparatory work and terms of reference agreed with and approved by the local
Executing Agency on behalf of all the LAC participating countries, in consultation with UNEP
and the OAS. The activities will be executed by regional, sub-regional and local agencies of the
countries where GEF-IW projects are under execution, a well as NGOs. The IWRN and the OAS
will supervise the coordination of the field activities, as directed by the Steering Committee,
through co-ordinators appointed from their staffs.
The participation of civil society organisations is a vital element of this project and will be
ensured through website connections, technical meetings, seminars, and workshops at different
levels.
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
ACTIVITIES
MONTH
Completion of project 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22
activities
Coordination
1.1. Convene three
regional meetings
1.2. Implementation of
Virtual Fora
1.3. Prepare a
document/brochure and
CD in the four OAS
languages
1.4. Support the
participation of key GEF-
IW project managers to
the series of international
meetings leading to Third
World Water Forum.
1.5. project twinning
activities
2.1. Develop guidelines
for inclusion of best
practices and lessons
learned.
2.2. Conduct three
regional training
workshop
3.1. Prepare a framework
to strengthen the
3.2. Redesign the IWRN
3.3. Establish a sub-
regional node in Brazil
23
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
3.4. Convene one
workshop to assess the
needs for training and
equipment.
3.5. Assist countries to
secure financing for the
establishment of IWRN
regional nodes in the
Americas.
3.6. Ensure adequate
linkages between IWRN
and other regional and
sub-regional networks
4.1. Identify five
potential pilot projects to
test the principals of ISP
within the IWRN
framework.
4.2. Meeting of GEF-IW
and other water resources
management project
managers and ISP focal
points.
5.1. Monitoring and
evaluation.
INDICATIVE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BY ACTIVITY IN US $
Activity
Month 1
Month 6
Month 12
Month 18
Month 22
Total
Steering Committee UNEP: 19,000 UNEP: 19,000 UNEP: 19,000
UNEP: 19,000 UNEP: 19,000 UNEP: 95,000
Meetings,
OAS: 20,000 OAS: 20,000
OAS: 20,000
OAS: 20,000
OAS: 20,000
OAS: 100,000
Technical
Coordination &
Supervision *
Coordination 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 72,000
Activity 1.1
30,000
30,000
28,600
88,600
Activity 1.2
33,700
33,700
67,400
Activity 1.3
35,000
35,000
34,600
104,600
Activity 1.4
51,000
51,000
50,600
152,600
Activity 1.5
5,000
10,000
10,000
25,000
Activity 2.1.
8,400
8,400
16,800
Activity 2.2
50,000
55,900
105,900
Activity 3.1
21,200
21,200
42,400
Activity 3,2
20,900
20,900
41,800
Activity 3.3
16,200
16,200
32,400
Activity 3.4
30,700
30,700
Activity 3.5
11,200
11,200
Activity 3.6
10,000
10,000
20,000
Activity 4.1
5,600
5,600
11,200
Activity 4.2
132,600
132,600
Activity 5.1
8,400
8,400
16,800
GEF TOTAL
154,800
338,300
356,500
99,600
22,800
972,000
* Reflects in-kind contribution by the Implementing and Executing Agencies, and is not
taken into consideration in the GEF total.
24
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN
As noted in the proposed activities, the objective of this project is to strengthen communication,
dissemination of information, and technical co-operation amongst agencies and civil society
involved in water resources management activities. Since most of these GEF-IW funded
activities are currently under implementation, public participation is already an intrinsic part of
the process. Identification of stakeholders and their information needs/resources will be
undertaken as part of this project under Component 3. In accordance with GEF principles of
multi-stakeholders involvement and public participation, a key element of this project will be its
participative approach ensuring extensive involvement of IWRN national, regional and sub-
regional focal points, as well as all GEF IW projects and any other relevant water resources
management projects focal points, local NGOs,... taking advantage of the Inter-American
Strategy for Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making (ISP).
The project will include, as essential elements, hyperlinks to home pages of relevant government
agencies, scientific institutions, and NGOs being depositary of relevant water resources
management information. Further, links to other networks with complementary objectives (e.g.
IW:LEARN) to those of the IWRN will enhance information availability and exchange. It is
intended that existing local networks, organised by local NGOs, be identified and included in the
enhanced IWRN system.
MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN
The administrative, technical, and financial reporting framework will be provided by the
Implementing Agency through the Executing Agency and the Steering Committee using standard
UNEP and OAS reporting protocols. The use of key process and status indicators will be an
intrinsic part of the project:
Process Indicators
Establishment of the Steering Committee for project implementation
Redesign and sustainable implementation of the IWRN, appointment and/or confirmation of
IWRN focal points, and establishment of up to five sub-regional nodes
Establishment of virtual fora and mechanisms for the exchange of knowledge and experiences
amongst GEF-IW project managers and other project proponents (e.g. UNEP, OAS,
IW:LEARN project team,...)
Publication and dissemination of proceedings of the various project meetings, and utilisation
of the proceedings as an input to future international waters meetings (e.g. Third World
Water Forum).
Stress Reduction Indicators
National water authorities utilise the IWRN for information exchange and coordination
National water authorities integrate holistic watershed management approaches in their water
resources policies, plans, and processes
ISP principals are included in national decision-making; stakeholders participate in decision-
making and water resources management.
Environmental Status Indicators
Knowledge base and lessons learned in water resources management available and utilised in
the IW:LEARN project
Goals, criteria and standards for monitoring are implemented
25
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Best management practices developed through GEF-IW projects identified and documented.
These status indicators will be refined and implemented within the project Components, as
agreed by the Steering Committee and UNEP. The objectives of the monitoring are to contribute
to improving, and, if needed, adapting the management of work program activities, and create a
basis for project evaluation. Implementing Agency supervision will be exercised through the
Executing Agency and by participation in the regular meetings of the Steering Committee. In the
first and second meetings of the Steering Committee, the work plan and the terms of reference for
project staff and consultants will be discussed and agreed, refining the process and status
indicators set forth above.
A project implementation review will be undertaken jointly by the Government and UNEP, as an
element of Component 5, within one year of the end of the other project activities.
This project document was circulated to GEF Sec and all IAs as part of the approval process.
Comments received from UNDP are addressed in Annex VII.
26
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Annex I
LIST OF GEF-IW PROJECTS IN LAC
(To be further refined at the inception of the project)
*Lake Titicaca - UNDP Peru, Bolivia
*ISP-Participation in Gulf of Honduras and Portland Bight-medium size project -UNEP/OAS
*Bermejo-UNEP/OAS Bolivia, Argentina
*Upper Paraguay-UNEP/OAS - Brazil
*Plata Maritime Front-UNDP Argentina, Uruguay
*Sao Francisco Basin-UNEP/OAS - Brazil
*San Juan Basin and Coast-UNEP/OAS Costa Rica, Nicaragua
*Argentina- Patagonia Marine Pollution-WB
*Caribbean Contaminated Bays(Cuba and Jamaica)-UNDP
*Caribbean : Planning For Adaptation to Climate Change-WB/OAS
*Mesoamerica Barrier Reef- WB
*Wider Caribbean Initiative for ship generated waste - WB-IMO
*Guarani Aquifer--WB/OAS Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay, Paraguay
*Caribbean SIDS--UNDP/UNEP
*Pesticides runoff to the Caribbean Sea UNEP Costa Rica, Panama, Columbia
*Central America, DDT Alternatives-UNEP/OAS/PAHO - Gulf of Mexico
*Putumayo Basin (Amazon)-WB/OAS Brazil, Peru, Columbia, Ecuador
*Global review of and support to integrated wetland, biodiversity and river basin management -
UNDP Global
Projects
Area of emphasis 3
Lake Titicaca
Freshwater biodiversity
ISP
Public Participation
Bermejo
Land degradation
Upper Paraguay
Wetland management
Sao Francisco
Multiple use
San Juan
Water Conflicts
Plata Maritime front
Pollution control Habitat protection
Patagonian shelf
Marine pollution in LMEs
Caribbean contaminated bays
Marine pollution sewage treatment
Caribbean Planning For Adaptation to Climate Climate Change
Change
Mesoamerica Barrier Reef
Marine biodiversity conservation
Wider Caribbean Initiative for ship generated Ship waste management
waste
Guarani Aquifer
Groundwater management
Caribbean SIDS
Water management in SIDs' environment
Pesticides runoff to the Caribbean sea
POPs (Agriculture)
Central America, DDT Alternatives
POPs
Putumayo Basin
Headwaters management
Global review of and support to integrated Review of lessons learned from RAMSAR sites
wetland, biodiversity and river basin
within shared river basins
management
3 The projects address multiple issues, the area of emphasis as presented here reflects major concerns prevailing in the area.
27
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Annex II
DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project, "Development and Implementation of Mechanisms to Disseminate
Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Integrated Transboundary Water Resources Management
in Latin America and the Caribbean", aims to promote South-to-South learning, develop and
implement mechanisms to disseminate the lessons being learned in GEF International Waters-
related (GEF-IW) projects in Latin America and the Caribbean, and improve capacity to
integrated land and water resource management. This Medium Size Project (MSP) will serve as a
demonstration project using Latin America and the Caribbean as a privileged site to illustrate
how systematic exchange of project experiences, lessons learned, and best practices can improve
integrated water resources management. Specifically, the project will strengthen and improve
mechanisms for the dissemination of information and lessons learned from GEF-IW projects and
other experiences in integrated land and water resources management within the Latin America
and Caribbean region.
Brazil, as the host country for Dialogue IV, is well positioned to host a regional discussion of
information dissemination and exchange with respect to GEF-IW projects. Brazil currently is
involved in the execution of four GEF-IW projects--in the Sao Francisco, Upper Paraguay,
Putumayo river basins and Guarani Aquifer--and, hence, has first hand knowledge of the nature
and conduct of GEF-IW projects in the region. As these projects, as well as the other GEF-IW
projects in the region, have achieved a level of maturity where information sharing would be
useful and beneficial to each of the projects, Dialogue IV provides a unique opportunity for the
conduct of discussions designed to facilitate such information sharing. Such discussions would
not only benefit existing GEF-IW projects in the region but also lead to the establishment of a
sustainable mechanism for consultation and co-operation in the fields of watershed management
and information technology.
This proposal, based upon GEF-IW OP 10, specifically addresses the short-term objectives of
"dissemination of lessons learned from ongoing projects, and sharing of learning experiences and
best management practices, within groups of countries co-operating on transboundary water
projects." It aims to catalyse a process that can be replicated through the IW:LEARN project and
related initiatives of UNEP and the GEF, using Latin America and the Caribbean as a privileged
site within which to develop the necessary approaches, mechanisms, and infrastructure.
The 15 activities proposed in this project were identified through a consultative process
conducted within the region and are organised under five project components. These activities
address identified needs related to information on water management, and take advantage of the
opportunities for discussion provided by the forthcoming Dialogue IV. One further, preparatory
activity, that of establishing the agenda for the discussions at the Dialogue IV meeting by means
of an electronic discussion forum (e-forum) moderated by UNEP, is to be completed prior to the
initiation of this project. The e-forum will create a framework within which the ensuing
discussions will take place, identify the elements that are to be included in the discussions that
follow, and inform the process to be initiated at the Dialogue IV meeting that comprises the
starting point for this MSP.
In all activities, priority will be given to local expertise in accordance with the principle of
participative approach.
Component 1 - Foster dialogue amongst GEF-IW and other related water resource
management projects in LAC establishing a mechanism to share recent accomplishments,
28
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
experiences from the planning and management of IW projects, lessons learned, and best
practices.
GEF-IW project managers not only need a means of communication with each other to address
common concerns, but also a mechanism whereby they can meet with government officials, local
authorities, and stakeholders to discuss the strategies for incorporating lessons learned in water
resources management practices and policies. Special sub-regional meetings will initiate the
process, which then will be continued through a Virtual Forum, integrated into a refined Inter-
American Water Resources Network (IWRN). To facilitate this process, up to five, identified
sub-regional nodes may be provided with necessary additional equipment (anticipated to
primarily consist of adequately-sized servers) to facilitate the participation of local stakeholders.
This exchange of lessons learned and best practices from GEF-IW projects in the region will be
launched at the forthcoming Dialogue IV meeting in Brazil (September 2001).
Because of the primary role of the IWRN in this process, the network will be made more user-
friendly, and redesigned to facilitate information exchange amongst water resources authorities
and river basin authorities in the region. A more dynamic process of consultation will be
implemented through the Virtual Forum and IWRN will assume a new role in moderating it. This
Virtual Forum will facilitate and enhance the dissemination of lessons learned and best river
basin management practices. As an essential part of this project, a regional node of IWRN will be
created in Brazil and, with the experience gathered through the development of this facility, other
sub-regional nodes will be implemented. These actions will make the IWRN a fast and reliable
communications tool with a much broader range. Smaller communities, river basin authorities
serving smaller river basins, and identified stakeholders will easily access water resources
information.
The Virtual Forum will be established in the first instance to initiate this process, building upon
the results of Dialogue IV. The Forum will be utilised, as appropriate, to obtain information on
specific discussion points, and will provide a mechanism to refine and enhance the role of the
IWRN. The results of the discussions completed within the Forum will be posted on the IWRN
sites and will provide potential inputs for discussion during the major global and international
water events (e.g. Third World Water Forum).
The financial inputs requested from the GEF for the specific activities comprising this
Component are:
1.1. Convene three regional meetings to exchange information amongst GEF-IW and other
water resources management project managers: US $ 88,600
Facilitator: 6 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 3) = US $ 33,600
Travel/Meetings: 20 participants:
per-diem: (20p x 5d x US $ 100/d x 3) = US $ 30,000
tickets: (US $ 1,000 x 20) = US $ 20,000
Support services: US $ 5,000
1.2. Implementation of Virtual Fora to facilitate information exchange on water resources
management issues, outlining lessons learned and best practices, using IWRN as a platform
with the IWRN Secretariat acting as moderator for the electronic discussion. This activity will
provide inputs to forthcoming global international waters meetings (e.g Third World Water
Forum): US $ 67,400
Local Technical Expertise: 4 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 4) = US $ 22,400
Sub-contracts with local experienced entities for the virtual forum = US $ 30,000
Equipment: complementary equipment for the Virtual Forum = US $ 10,000
29
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Support services: US $ 5,000
1.3. As a result of the regional meetings and the Virtual Fora, a comprehensive
document/brochure and CD, in the four OAS languages, will be prepared. These products will
disseminate the results of this project, outlining water resources practices and lessons learned
in the Americas. These materials will be presented at the Third World Water Forum as well as
all related meetings: US $ 104,600
Local Technical Expertise: 3 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 3) = US $ 16,800
Sub-contracts with local experienced entities for:
Document translation: (US $ 80/page x 40 x 4) = US $ 12,800
Editing and Printing: US $ 11 x 5000 copies: = US $ 55,000
Electronic edition (5000 CD): US $ 15,000
Support services: US $ 5,000
1.4. Support for the participation of key GEF-IW project managers in the series of
international meetings leading to the Third World Water Forum: US $ 152,600
Travel/Meetings: 45 participants:
air tickets: US $ 2,000/ticket x 45 = US $ 90,000
per-diem: US $ 180/d x 45 x 6 = US $ 48,600
fees and charges not included in per-diem: US $ 200 x 45 = US $ 9,000
Support services: US $ 5,000
1.5. Organise exchange of project officers amongst the projects in LAC (twinning):
US$25,000
Travel (twining amongst 5 projects): 15 participants
per diem: (15p x 5d x US$ 80.00) = US$6,000
air tickets: (15 x US1,300) = US$19,000
Component 2. - Foster the inclusion of lessons learned and best practices into water
resources management practices.
The experience acquired during the execution of GEF-IW projects is valuable and involves all
stakeholders within the subject river basins. Presently most countries develop actions to
implement national and local water resources management systems at different levels. This
historically has proceeded in relative isolation and often on a sectoral level, leading to significant
disconnects in the goals, objectives and methods of water resources management. Many of the
consequent problems and issues of concern potentially could have been avoided with improved
communication and information-sharing. Therefore, it is of great importance to share this
experience and include the lessons learned into the routine water management practices.
The financial inputs requested from the GEF for the specific activities comprising this
Component are:
2.1. Develop specific guidelines for inclusion of best practices and lessons learned into
policies and regulations and in the development of new water resources management
activities: US $ 16,800
Local Technical Expertise: 3 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 3) = US $ 16,800
30
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
2.2. Conduct three regional training workshop with a view to promoting the inclusion of
lessons learned and best practices in the development of new activities: US $ 105,900
Local Technical Expertise: 4 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 4) = US $ 22,400
Sub-contracts with local experienced entities for: lease of electronic equipment:
US $ 50,000
Travel/Meetings: 15 participants:
per-diem: (15p x 3d x US $ 100/d x 3) = US $ 13,500
air tickets: (US $ 1,000/tk) = US $ 15,000
Support services: US $ 5,000
Component 3- Strengthening of the IWRN as the principal hemispheric communication
tool for integrated water resources management.
Processes for sharing and disseminating experiences and lessons learned from GEF-IW projects
in Latin America and the Caribbean, via the Internet as well as through other media, will be
identified, tested and refined for future use.
The financial inputs requested from the GEF for the specific activities comprising this
Component are:
3.1. Prepare a framework to strengthen the IWRN as a hemispheric communication tool for
integrated land and water resources management: US $ 42,400
Local Technical Expertise: 4 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 4) = US $ 22,400
Sub-contracts with local experienced entities for:
Document translation : US $ 10,000
Document editing and printing (B/W): US $ 5,000
Support services: US$ 5,000
3.2. Redesign the IWRN web site making it an interactive metadata site, ensuring information
exchange rather than just information dissemination, using protocols for searching, accessing
and acquiring information and data, enhancing its dialogue function: US $ 41,800
Local Technical Expertise: 3 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 3) = US $ 16,800
Sub-contracts with local experienced entities for: website design: US $ 20,000
Support services: US $ 5,000
3.3. Establish a sub-regional node in Brazil as well as in selected potential Thematic Centers
of Excellence--as a pilot sites within this activity--to test the website and related
communications tools: US $ 32,400
Local Technical Expertise: 4 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 4) = US $ 22,400
Sub-contracts with local experienced entities for: webmaster: US $ 10,000
3.4. Convene one workshop to assess the needs for training and equipping of water resources
professionals and NGOs within Brazil to utilise the IWRN; and provide training where needed
to promote access to, and use of, the IWRN by water resources professionals and NGOs: US $
30,700
Local Technical Expertise: 2 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 2) = US $ 11,200
Travel/Meetings: 15 participants:
per-diem: (15p x 5d x US $ 100/d) = US $ 7,500
air tickets: US $ 800/tk = US $ 12,000
31
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
3.5. Assist countries in securing financing for the establishment of IWRN sub-regional nodes
in the Americas: US $ 11,200
Local Technical Expertise: 2 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 2) = US $ 11,200
3.6. Ensure adequate linkages between IWRN and other regional and sub-regional networks
involved in water resources management: US $ 20,000
Sub-contracts with local experienced entities for: webmaster: US $ 15,000
Equipment: US $ 5,000
Component 4 - Involve civil society according to principles set forth in the Inter-American
Strategy for Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making (ISP).
The financial inputs requested from the GEF for the specific activities comprising this
Component are:
4.1. Identify five sub-regional and/or national (one in each of the sub-regions of the Americas)
pilot projects to test the principals of ISP within the IWRN framework: US $ 11,200
Local Technical Expertise: 2 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 2) = US $ 11,200
4.2. Organise a special meeting of GEF-IW and other water resources management project
managers and ISP focal points to facilitate the inclusion of the principles of the ISP in water
resources management projects, and help to reduce misunderstandings and conflicts through
proper consultation with the civil society: US $ 157,600
Local Technical Expertise: 1 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m) = US $ 5,600
Travel/Meetings: 53 participants
air tickets: US $ 1,500/ticket x 53 = US $ 79,500
per-diem: US $ 120/d x 70 x 5 = US $ 42,000
Support services: US $ 5,500
Component 5 - Monitoring and Evaluation.
The financial inputs requested from the GEF for the specific activities comprising this
Component are:
5.1. In addition to the monitoring and evaluation activities exercised by the GEF
Implementing Agency, and in addition to the day-to-day monitoring of activities by the OAS
as the Executing Agency, the OAS will co-ordinate a mid-term and final evaluation of the
project activities: US $ 16,800
Local Technical Expertise: 3 p/m (US $ 35.00/h x 160h/m x 3) = US $ 16,800
32
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Annex III
Letter of endorsement from Brazil
33
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Letter of endorsement from Nicaragua
34
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Letter of endorsement from Costa Rica
35
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Letter of endorsement from St Vincent and Grenadines
36
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Letter of endorsement from Jamaica
37
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Letter of endorsement from Panama
38
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Letter of support from Bolivia
39
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
40
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Annex IV
Letter of support from IW:LEARN
41
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Annex V
GEF-IW-LAC PROJECT MANAGERS' FORUM REPORT TO THE FOURTH INTER-
AMERICAN DIALOGUE ON WATER MANAGEMENT - FOZ DO IGUACU, BRAZIL
1-2 SEPTEMBER 2001
BACKGROUND
Thirty project managers from nine International Waters Projects, being conducted with
incremental funding from the Global Environment Facility (GEF-IW) in Latin America and
Caribbean (LAC), exchanged information, experiences, and lessons learned prior to and during
the Fourth Inter-American Dialogue on Water Management. This process was designed to
construct relationships, exchange information, identify appropriate mechanisms to manage and
share this information, and determine a means of continuing this process of information sharing
and dissemination.
STATEMENT OF ISSUES
The GEF-IW program has developed a considerable volume of information, experience and
knowledge within the LAC region which has not been adequately disseminated or included in
development processes;
The time is ripe for the development of mechanisms to share this information, experience,
and knowledge;
There is a need for a mechanism to disseminate information, experiences and knowledge in
order to influence policy and process to achieve the integrated management of water
resources within a context of socially, economically and environmentally sustainable
development.
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
The GEF-IW program is the primary vehicle for developing the information, experience and
knowledge necessary for formulating and implementing sustainable water resources management
and development within the LAC region. This primacy was recognised:
By integrating the information, experience and knowledge of the GEF-IW LAC program with
the Inter-American Water Resources Network (IWRN), this information, experience and
knowledge can reach a broader community of decision-makers and policy-makers throughout
the LAC region;
Access to such information, experience and knowledge will enable this community to
translate best practices into policy and legal and institutional frameworks across the spectrum
of local water resources and transboundary basins;
Synergies with IW-LEARN can provide this information, experience and knowledge, already
in place, to GEF-IW projects likely to be developed or implemented within the LAC region or
replicated at the global scale.
42
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Annex VI
Links between GEF-IW, IWRN, and IW:LEARN
43
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
IW-
GEF-IW
LEARN
· GLOBA
Primary funding source for IW
· Extensive project experience
·
· GL
B
O A
Sharing GEF Projects' experience
Distance learning technical,
knowledge sharing, & IT assistance
Experience-exchange process
Local and regional partners
GEF-IW-LAC
LAC
LAC
· e-Forum & Foz
· Best Practices
· Project Twinning
· Policy Changes
IWRN
· Exchange of water-related
information in the AMERICAS
· National Focal Points
LAC
Experience/knowledge
exchange mechanism
44
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
ANNEX VII
UNDP MSP REVIEW AND RESPONSE
COMMENTS FROM UNDP ON UNEP'S MSP ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF MECHANISMS TO DISSEMINATE LESSONS LEARNED AND
BEST PRACTICES IN INTEGRATED TRANSBOUNDARY WATER RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN".
Overall this is a good proposal which UNDP supports as an important contribution to the
Regional/Global Technical Support component of OP10. The intended linkages with and
endorsement from the global IW:LEARN project bodes well for the possible success of the
project as a demonstration of a regional scale knowledge sharing exercise.
Since the project proposes to support knowledge sharing among the Caribbean SIDS,
linkages and coordination should also be included with SIDSNet, given the overlap in certain
objectives and themes. IW:LEARN has already developed such linkages so it is a natural
extension for IWRN to do the same. Similar linkages should also be explored with the MSP
presently under development, Global Review of and Support to Integrating Wetland,
Biodiversity and River Basin Management, which includes a review of the lessons learned
from Ramsar sites within shared river basins.
The proposal is inconsistent in referring to the geographic scope of the international waters
environments to be addressed, e.g. in some places "watershed and coastal zone", others
"transboundary river basins" or simply "water resources management". Similarly, 5 of the 17
LAC projects listed in Annex I are marine/coastal projects such as Patagonia and Plata/MF.
Assuming the project intends to promote knowledge sharing among the whole spectrum of
LAC IW projects and settings (e.g. river basin, groundwater system, coastal zone, LME,
SIDS), this should be explicitly stated.
The presence of only one LAC country (Brazil) on the Steering Committee doesn't seem
particularly inclusive or representative. Project should consider including several other
countries on the Steering Committee, perhaps representing selected LAC constituencies
along the same lines as the GEF Council. For example, representation could include the
countries that formally endorsed the project proposal.
All of the indicators summarised in the M&E Plan on p.25 are process indicators, none are
stress reduction or environmental status indicators.
45
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
RESPONSE TO UNDP's COMMENTS ON UNEP'S MSP ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF MECHANISMS TO DISSEMINATE LESSONS LEARNED AND
BEST PRACTICES IN INTEGRATED TRANSBOUNDARY WATER RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN". "
Overall, the comments of UNDP are supportive of the implementation this LAC IW knowledge
sharing MSP. Specific response to UNDP's queries and remarks are provided herebelow.
1. Linkages with SIDSNet
We have taken good note of UNDP's recommendations for linkages and coordination with
SIDSNet. In linking with SIDSNet we will make sure to draw on IW:LEARN experience on the
matter. Further, the MSP project "Global Review of and Support to Integrating Wetland,
Biodiversity and River Basin Management" which includes a review of the lessons learned
from Ramsar sites within shared river basins has been included in the list of projects
presented in Annex I of the document. This list will be reviewed and refined at the inception
of the project and will form the basis for this regionally based knowledge sharing exercise. In
addition specific references to SIDSNet have been incorporated on pages 9,12 and 15.
2. Geographical scope of the international waters environments
For clarity, a footnote precising the scope of this project and referring to the GEF definition of
International Waters has been added on page 1. It should be noted though that the term
"basin" reflects UNEP's and to some extend most of the professional community's definition
of the term and does not exclude the coastal zone which is the natural end point of most
systems at the exception of endorhic systems such as the lakeTiticaca system.
3. LAC countries in the Steering Committee
The virtual committee mirrors GEF's own system of dealing with proposals whereby not every
GEF proposal is discussed in person within the council but rather are distributed electronically
and input delivered in the same manner. For clarity, the institutional arrangement as outlined
on page 22 as been amended to ensure that that all endorsing countries are included via
network linkages in a virtual steering committee. In addition, the project will maintain a
physical presence in Brazil, wherefrom all coordination activities will be implemented.
4. Indicators
The list as presented in the document follows GEFguidance document and addresses all
three types of indicators. The majority of indicators are naturally process indicators since the
purpose of the project is to create and implement a process. However, in terms of stress
reduction, the content of the network will assist countries to address environmental concerns
through information exchange and holistic/watershed based management of resources; and
address environmental status indicators by developing common, transboundary standards,
etc.
46
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Annex VIII - GEF Sec. Project Review Sheet and response
47
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
48
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
49
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
50
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
51
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Response to GEF. Sec Review Sheet
As per the review sheet: "The program manager would recommend the proposal for
CEO approval subject to: (i) re-submission under OP9, (ii) confirmation of
endorsements from a representative number of other LAC countries.
The MSP proposal has been amended to fit under OP9 as reflected on page one,
and ten.
The proposal has recently been endorsed by Panama bringing the total number of
endorsements to 6 that is from Brasil, St Vincent and Grenadines, Jamaica,
Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Bolivia has also provided its support through
the Director of the Binational Commission for the Rio Bermejo and Pilcomayo
(see Annex III). The support of IW:LEARN and potential synergies between the
two projects are formalised in a support letter from Mr Sklarew, Director
IW:LEARN
Finally the text has been slightly edited for enhanced clarity.
52
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
ANNEX IX
GEF SEC REVIEW OF 21 AUGUST 2002 & RESPONSE
Aduda@worldbank.org
To: Isabelle.Vanderbeck@unep.org, kristin.elliott@rona.unep.org,
2002/08/21 11:19 PM
Vladimir.Mamaev@unep.org
Cc: robin.burgess@rona.unep.org, Ahmed.Djoghlaf@unep.org,
Amerla@worldbank.org, Hacquay@worldbank.org,
Srechache@worldbank.org
Subject: Proposed IW MSP-Development and Implementation of
Mechanisms to Disseminate Lessons Learned and Best
Practices in Integrated Transboundary Water Resources
Management in Latin America and the Caribbean
Dear Isabelle, Vladimir, and Kristin,
Per discussions with Herbert and a number of submissions of
drafts of the subject proposal, we believe that you are close to
receiving technical clearance of this important IW MSP.
Perhaps you might make 2 revisions to incorporate final
GEFSEC comments. Andrea had recommended technical
clearance earlier, but these two suggestions would revolve two
remaining issues. And thank you for securing the additional
focal point endorsements that demonstrate country interest in
this initiative.
The first point relates to operational program. We did suggest
earlier putting this in OP 9. However, it does more closely fit OP
10, the regional/global technical support component.
The second point relates to the use of consultancies and
possible reallocation of some consultant/subcontract funding. In
IW, GEF seeks to facilitate those who have experiences in
transboundary water resources to actively dialogue with others
rather than to send consultants around to put together the
experiences of others. In practical terms, this would mean
having more small contracts to those who have experiences to
share rather than larger contracts with experts.
53
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
We accept that those with such experiences should be paid to
document these experiences and to interact with groups of
people like themselves in sharing the experiences that may
eventually become "lessons learned". For example, and in
accordance with the ISP, NGOs might then be contracted to
document/describe their experiences in transboundary waters
that may be vetted in larger groups before becoming "best
practices". Perhaps the proposal might be revised to reflect the
utilization of smaller contracts and a participative approach to
involve the IWRN/ISP/transboundary project focal points and in
the process record/document their experiences for future GEF
use.
Thank you for ensuring the linkages to IWLEARN, incorporating
the Centers of Excellence idea, and ensuring that coastal/marine
experiences with transboundary issues are included.
We look forward to this MSP testing how such mechanisms on
one continent can be structured and hopefully leaving the
revitalized IWRN in the position of incorporating transboundary
water and related biodiversity issues into its operations by the
end of the project.
Al
54
8-27-02 Brazil UNEP MSP IWRN final project version 22-08-02.doc
Response to GEF. Sec Review of 21 August 2002
As per GEF Sec's comments of 21 august 2002, the MSP proposal has been
amended as follows:
It now falls under OP10 as reflected on page one, and ten.
The emphasis placed on the use of local expertise and local experienced
entities including NGOs has been clarified as reflected in p22 (budget
table), p23 (2nd para), p29 to 32 (breakdown budget). UNEP-OAS, as
always the case with its other GEF-IW projects, will continue to favour
local expertise thereby adhering strictly to the GEF principles.
Although based on UNEP-OAS GEF IW experience in LAC, and taking
advantage of the ISP, public participation has become an intrinsic part of
all of our activities, the emphasis placed on participative approach has
been further stressed out in p12 (last para), p13 (4th para), p14 (2nd&3rd
bullet), p16 (component 4), p17 (last para), p22-23 (implementation plan),
p25 (1st para).
Finally the text has been slightly edited for enhanced clarity.
55
Document Outline