Annex IV



TRANSBOUNDARY DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS (TDA)
INCLUDING ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
CONTENTS

Annex IV 1

INTRODUCTION i

analysis of the problems and their root causes 3

RELEVANT INFORMATION AND DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEMS 15

3.1 Sources of degradation in the San Juan River Basin and its Coastal Zone 15

3.1.1 Problems related to soil degradation and sedimentation 16

3.1.2 Problems related to ecosystem degradation 19

3.1.3 Problems related to water quality 21

3.1.4 Problems related to water resource use 26

3.1.5 Problems related to the over-exploitation of natural resources 28

3.1.6 Problems related to the political, legal, and institutional framework for the integrated management of the SJRB 32

3.1.7 Problems related to economic development 33

3.1.8 Problems related to the social area 35

3.2 Centers of pollution and sensitive areas 38

3.2.1 Urban centers 38

3.2.2 Lake Nicaragua 38

3.2.3 Caño Negro 38

3.2.4 San Juan River and its Coastal Zone 38

3.2.5 Indio Maíz River Biological Reserve 39

3.2.6 Tortuguero Canals 39

TABLE 1 45

CONSEQUENCES 45

TABLE 6 51

ESTIMATE OF THE POLLUTING POTENTIAL OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS 51

PROTECTED AREAS IN THE BASIN AND THEIR MAIN PERMITTED USES 55

SUPPLY OF CUT WOOD IN THE PROJECT AREA 59

TABLE 13 60

TABLE 14 60

TABLE 16 61

INSTALLED CAPACITY AND REAL PRODUCTION 61

TABLE 17 61

TABLE 18 61

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AQUIFERS 64

LOCATED IN THE STUDY AREA 64

ANNEX 1. LOCATION MAP 39

ANNEX 2. FIGURES 40

ANNEX 3. TABLES 43

INTRODUCTION

The San Juan River basin and its coastal zone1 is located in the area that drains into the Caribbean Sea and covers a large part of the territory of Costa Rica and Nicaragua and constitutes an important part of the natural capital of both countries. It contains a variety of ecosystems and highly valuable water resources. This transboundary diagnostic analysis (TDA) is the result of studies conducted within the SJRB using funds provided in part through a Project Preparation and Development Facility (PDF) Block B grant of the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The TDA is designed to identify and evaluate the major environmental problems that face, or may face, the SJRB and to determine their root causes. In addition, the TDA seeks to identify the cause-effect chain underlying the identified problems, and to determine their relationship with the deterioration of the basin’s water resources. The TDA emphasizes the transboundary aspect of the SJRB, and represents a potential contribution to the development of the GEF’s operational strategy in international waters.

Information from major sources, such as the Diagnostic Study of the San Juan River Basin and Guidelines for an Action Plan2, as well as the validation of its main findings and the acquisition of new information through the conduct of various national and binational workshops held before and during the execution of the PDF-B planning program, have been a starting point for detecting the most salient transboundary elements of the environmental problems in the SJRB. Particular attention was given to the coastal-marine zone, as the previous study did not include that area. The PDF-B document for the Integrated Management of Water Resources and the Sustainable Development of the SJRB indicates that the major environmental problems were initially perceived to be as follows:

  1. Soil erosion originating in the lack of effective soil management practices, in the development of agriculture in areas not suited to cultivation, and in accelerated and intensive deforestation at a national rate of over 150,000 hectares per year in Nicaragua and 18,500 hectares per year in Costa Rica.

  2. Pollution of water bodies as a result of the inappropriate use of agro-chemicals and the uncontrolled disposal of municipal and industrial waste water and solid waste.

In the process of executing the PDF-B planning program, a number of other problems, in addition to those mentioned above, were identified. The three major problems identified are:

  1. Accelerating degradation of transboundary ecosystems.

  2. Overexploitation of valuable natural resources.

  3. High vulnerability to natural hazards.

This document takes a closer look at the particular areas of the SJRB where the environmental problems indicated are identified as most severe, applying the methodology used by the GEF projects for the identification of “hot spots”, or critical points, or for manifestations that are even more specific and concentrated than the so-called “hot spots” that have been identified at the basin scale.

The TDA is formulated on the premise that when the goods and services provided by ecosystems are not appropriately used, they become stressed, often to a critical point, by demands from socioeconomic sectors, which causes the loss of potential water and biodiversity resources. This situation worsens to the extent that the institutions in charge of the regulation and control of the use of natural resources have technical, legal, and/or economic limitations that prevent them from exercising the necessary control to avoid reaching extreme situations. This situation is schematically illustrated in Figures 1 and 2 of Annex 2. In this regard, the technical group, responsible for the preparation of the TDA, reached the decision to combine the analysis of aspects related to water resources and their biotic interactions with an analysis in which the social and economic aspects, together with the biological ones, are integrated to form a more comprehensive environmental approach that would reflect the things that affect a number of the components of sustainable development. This methodology better reflects both the nature and the manifestations of the major environmental problems, in view of the fact that there are poverty-stricken human settlements in the basin area and its coastal zone.

The TDA presented here was produced through a participatory process, directed by an environmental consultant, with contributions by all the members of the national technical teams working on the project in both countries and participation by various international consultants. In this way, it was possible to combine the knowledge of the territory possessed by the national consultants in each country with the honed experience of international consultants. Participating in the project and in the TDA formulation were specialists in the following disciplines: coastal management, hydrology, environmental economics, ecology, sociology, natural resource management, forestry, agronomy, administration of transboundary projects, and institutional development and strengthening. The work of the TDA also benefited from the wealth of views expressed through public participation in four workshops: two held in each of the countries, and two held at the binational or transboundary level. At these events, members of central government bodies, local governments, producer associations, the academic community, the private sector, and non-governmental organizations participated and shared their experiences.

The content of this TDA is an attempt to address environmental problems, their causes and effects, and to identify possible solutions in the SJRB or at more specific locations. Notwithstanding, it is a work in progress that will constitute an integral part of the proposed Strategic Action Program (SAP), in which the transboundary dimension will be more clearly represented, once further participation by the public and citizenry, and basin-wide data and information for analysis provide a better appreciation of that dimension.

The TDA is presented in three sections:

Section 1: Perceived major problems and their root causes. This section summarizes the main environmental problems perceived, the transboundary elements they encompass, their root causes, and the proposed action areas.

Section 2: Analysis of the problems and their root causes. This section presents in table format the perceived problems, actors involved, their effects, short- and long-term causes, possible solutions, and potential transboundary benefits.

Section 3: Relevant information and detailed analysis of the problems. This section presents information relevant to the problems analyzed in greater detail, for those interested in obtaining the available quantitative information.

In addition, in order to identify areas of work for the formulation of the SAP, and using an integrated design for the development and use of natural resources, action areas for the implementation of environmental investment projects were determined. Nevertheless, a constant limiting factor in the preparation of this TDA has been the lack of basin-wide information on natural resources, socio-economics, and environment from within the SJRB, which has made it impossible to better quantify most of the problems identified here.

SECTION 1

PERCEIVED MAJOR PROBLEMS AND THEIR ROOT CAUSES

T

MAIN ROOT CAUSES

  1. Inadequate Planning and Management

  • Conservation areas delimitations do not follow water basins delimitations

  • Lack of integrated watershed/ coastal zone management plans

  • Lack of reliable comprehensive and up-to-date information

  1. Weak Institutions

  • Laws are not being complied

  • Lack of financial resources for implementation of laws and programs

  • Abundance of laws and regulations, but lack of adequate national and regional policies and institutional frameworks

  • Weak institutional arrangements

  • Lack of access to information for decision-making

  1. Insufficient Human and Institutional Capacity

  • Lack of watershed oriented environmental education programs

  • Lack of financial resources at the local level (municipalities)

  • Lack of research on sustainable technologies

  • Lack of economic alternatives

  • Weak or nonexistent management capacity

  • Politics within local and central government institutions

  1. Limited Stakeholder Participation

  • Historic centralization of decision-making processes

  • Uncontrolled human migration patterns

  • Weak coordination between state and society

  • Lack of adequate information for decision-making

  1. Extreme Poverty

  • Low incomes, subsistence econonies and poor sanitation

  • Relative imbalance in employment and income-generating opportunities across the border

  • Uncontrolled migration patterns

  • High population growth


able 1.1. Perceived Major Problems and their Root Causes

PERCEIVED MAJOR PROBLEMS

TRAUNSBOUNDERY ELEMENTS

MAIN ROOT CAUSES

ACTION AREAS

The accelerating degradation of transboundary ecosystems

  • Damage to transboundary ecosystems. Loss of goods and services,biodiversity and ecosystems stability

  • Decrease in quality of life. Increased poverty

  • Loss of revenues

1
2
5
4

3

A
B
C

Overexploitation of valuable natural resources

  • Loss of natural resources productivity

  • Loss of potential income from agriculture, fishing and tourism

  • Increased poverty

  • Threat to biodiversity

  • Change in coastal and inland waterway dynamics

5
1

2
3
4

A
B
C

Soil degradation and increasing sedimentation

  • Economic losses due to sedimentation

  • Increased poverty

  • Loss of wetlands

  • Eutrophication of water bodies and the coastal zone

  • Loss in water storage capacity of rivercourses

5
1
2
3

4

A
B
C

Pollution of water bodies

  • Loss of biodiversity

  • Increased poverty

  • Deterioration of hygenic-sanitary conditions

  • Lack of territory identification and settlement

  • Accelerating increase of population

5
1

2

3
4

A
B

C

H

AREAS WHERE ACTION IS PROPOSED

A. Institutional Strengthening

  • Institutional arrangements

  • Capacity Building and Institutional strengthening

  • Infrastructure and revenew increasing mechanisms

B. Integrated Planning and Management

  • Development of comprehensive river basin/ coastal zone management programmes

  • Stakeholders involvement

  • Strengthening of a basin-wide information system

C. Environmental Education

  • Training of different sectors, students, housewives, farmers, etc.


igh vulnerability to natural hazards

  • Increased poverty

  • Human settlements in areas exposed to landslides (hill-side housing and agriculture) and flooding (riverside housing)

  • Increase of surface runoff and flooding areas

  • Decrease of flooding recurrence interval

5
1

2

4

3

A

B

C



SECTION 2

analysis of the problems and their root causes

This section presents the major problems identified during the formulation of the TDA for the SJRB, summarized in eight tables.

These problems were identified on the basis of the Diagnostic Study of the San Juan River Basin and Guidelines for an Action Plan, through the validation of its main findings, and based upon complementary studies carried out during the PDF-B planning program. These complementary studies were aimed towards the identification and collection of data on the coastal-marine zone, and the identification and analysis of the transboundary elements of the SJRB environmental issues. In addition, various national and binational workshops were held before and during the execution of the PDF-B planning program, through which additional information was obtained and the analysis was validated. The problems identified were grouped in the following categories:

  1. Accelerating degradation of transboundary ecosystems.

  2. Overexploitation of valuable natural resources.

  3. Soil degradation and increasing sedimentation.

  4. Pollution of water bodies.

  5. High vulnerability to natural hazards.

  6. Disintegration of social groups and uprooting from territory.

  7. Inadequate political, legal, and institutional framework for integrated management of the SJRB.

  8. Loss of economic potential in the SJRB.

Due to its comprehensive nature, the root cause analysis integrates the various factors and elements related to the use and management of water and natural resources within the basin. In that way, physical and biotic elements, institutional and policy issues, and social and economic factors, they all interact with each other in a very complex chain of causes and effects. The categorization presented above attempts to simplify and, therefore, ease the understanding of the cause-effect analysis, retrieving those problems which due to their regional impact and relevance must be addressed, if the integrated management of water and natural resources and the sustainable development of the SJRB wants to be achieved. As a result of the analysis of current and emerging environmental problems, it is observed that the first five categories can explain the main perceived problems and their root causes. The remaining three categories are identified within the causal chain of the first five. However, due to the complexity and relevance of those three categories, they are discussed individually in this document.

Table 2.1 presents the cause-effect chain, indicating the immediate, secondary, and ultimate causes, and the root causes of these problems. The Arabic numerals that appear in parentheses under each of the immediate causes indicate the relationship that exists between each of those causes and the major problems. The Roman numerals appearing in parentheses under the ultimate causes indicate, in order of priority, the existing relationship between these and the root causes of the problems. In this table, it should be noted that the three additional problems, grouped in the following categories, are part of the five major problems previously identified: Disintegration of social groups and uprooting from territory; Inadequate political, legal, and institutional framework for integrated management of the SJRB; and Loss of economic potential in the SJRB.

Further, the presence of the same causes-effects and/or root causes in two or more major problem areas shows the complexity of the cause-effect-root chain, which is in turn a result of the dependence of water resources on the condition of the ecosystems forming the SJRB, for which reason the integrated management of water resources involves proper management of all the natural resources and ecosystems present in the basin.

Table 2.1 Analysis of the cause-effect-root chain of the major problems.




Table 2.2. Accelerating degradation of transboundary ecosystems.

Problems

Impact/

Stakeholders

Effect

Immediate Cause

Root Cause

Possible Solutions

Potential Transboundary Benefits

Encroachment of farmland

Changes in land use

Inappropriate forestry techniques

Low profitability of agricultural and livestock production

Uncontrolled fires

Inappropriate fishery techniques

Introduction of exotic species

Open-pit mining and extraction of construction materials

Civil society

Development associations

Private enterprise

Governmental entities

Costa Rican Rural Guard and National Army of Nicaragua

Municipalities

Fragmentation of habitats

Elimination of the organic part of the soil due to soil erosion

Damage to species and ecosystems

Disappearance of species

Invasion of ecosystems and protected areas

Opening of access roads

Competition with local species

Greenhouse effect

Subsistence economy. Few sources of income

Extensive livestock rearing

Nomadic agriculture

Delimitation of plots

Lack of control and nonenforcement of laws

Need to use natural resources

Lack of financing

Flooding of land

Inappropriate production systems

Lack of environmental education/lack of interest on the part of the population

Lack of economic alternatives

Failure to apply legislation in force

Inadequate planning

No research

Lack of reliable, comprehensive, and updated information for proper decision-making

Historical centralization of decision-making processes

Construction of hydroelectric dams without an environmental dimension

Obsolete technology

Lack of technical assistance

Tax incentives for proper natural resource management

Establish limits on soil use

Territorial planning

Efficient legislation

Community empowerment

Environmental education

Participation by citizens

Animal farming programs

Training in institutional strengthening

Strengthening of the information system for the SJRB

Better use of the soil in the SJRB

Better natural resource protection by means of the incentives received

Rationalization of natural resource use

Environment conducive to the protection of endangered species


Table 2.3. Overexploitation of valuable natural resources.

Problem

Impact/
Stakeholders

Effect

Immediate Cause

Root Cause

Possible Solutions

Potential Transboundary Benefits

Overexploitation of forests for wood and energy

Overexploitation of land, marine, & fresh water species

Illegal trafficking of wildlife species

Unregulated hunting

Civil society:

fishermen

farmers

hunters

loggers

Private enterprise

Ranchers

Industry in general

Exploitations/ Plantations

Conservationist Associations

Government agencies

Loss of natural habitats, ecosystems, and their biodiversity

Destruction of wetlands

Disappearance of species

Decline in fisheries and food chain problems

Reduction in ichthyic fauna in rivers

Reduction in the flow rates of rivers

Erosion

Pollution of water bodies

Lack of sustainable economic alternatives

Institutional weakness. Lack of technical capacity and economic resources

Little police presence or patroll-ing of the zone

Little attention to coastal and marine zones

Unscientific artisanal fishing

Difficulty controlling land use

Undue tilling and use of the soil

Lack of marine-coastal area management programs

High population growth

Little interest in the exploitation of marine-coastal zones

Lack of economic resources in the municipalities

Private sector land holdings in zones adjacent to or inside protected areas

Land planning and basin management plans

Institutional arrangements for resource management

Integrated Marine-Coastal Zone Management jointly with both countries

Studies on population dyna-mics of species to ensure their sustainable use

Controls for efficient natural resource use by the state, through continuous patrols

Strengthening of an information system for the SJRB

Involvement of civil society

Sustainable use of resources

Preservation of endangered species

Better use of natural resources


Table 2.4. Soil degradation and increasing sedimentation.

Problem

Impact/
Stakeholders

Effect

Immediate Cause

Root Cause

Possible Solutions

Potential Transboundary Benefits

Erosion by water

Changes in land use

Overexploitation of forests

Low profitability of agricultural production

Uncontrolled fires

Civil society

farmers

loggers

Private enterprise

Ranchers

Exploitations/ plantations

Conservationist Associations

Government agencies

Loss of soil fertility

Reduction in water recharge

Reduction in river flow rates

Change in the dynamics of the hydro-logical cycle

Degradation of aquatic and marine-coastal habitats

Deforestation

Inappropriate forestry techniques

Uncontrolled fires

Unsustainable agriculture (hillside farming, on unsuitable land using inappropriate technologies)

High population growth

Flooding of land

Open-pit mining and extraction of construction materials

Extensive livestock rearing

Unsustainable agriculture (hillside farming, on unsuitable land using inappropriate technologies)

Low profitability of agricultural activities

Uncontrolled human migration

Breakdown of the family structure

Hydroelectric projects with no environmental dimension

Better knowledge of the dynamics of erosion, sediment-ation, and pollution

Integrated natural and water resource management plans

Tax incentives for the proper manage-ment of natural resources

Sustainable econo-mic alternatives

Land planning

Environmental education for farmers, ranchers, and the general population

Community participation

More research and strengthening of the information system of the SJRB

Water monitoring

Better use of the soil in the SJRB

Better protection of natural resources based on the incentives received

Improved water quality and availability

Improved quality of life of the inhabitants and the ecosystems of the SJRB


Table 2.5. Pollution of water bodies.

Problem

Impact/

Stakeholders

Effect

Immediate Cause

Root Cause

Possible Solutions

Potential Transboundary Benefits

Excessive use of pesticides

Excessive use of fertilizers

Erosion by water

Municipal waste (sewage)

Municipal solid waste (garbage)

Industrial waste (solid and liquid)

Deterioration in hygiene and sanitary conditions

Open-pit mining and extraction of construction materials

Government agencies

Private enterprise

Trade unions and associations

Municipalities

General populations

Pollution of surface water and groundwater and soil by agro-chemicals

Reduction in productivity and loss of soil resources

Decline in water quality

Reduction in the production of phyto- and zoo-plankton

Sedimentation of water bodies and marine-coastal zone

Degradation of habitats and impact on biodiversity

Lack of awareness (environmental education)

Nonsustainable productive culture

Unplanned human settlements

Failure to treat household sewage and industrial effluents

Nonsustainable agriculture

Livestock rearing

Deforestation

Lack of research

Lack of dissemination of technology

Lack of public interest and no budget

Lack of basin-oriented environmental education

Lack of agricultural extension

Lack of planning or controls

Little control of effluents from enterprises operating in the zone

Lack of financial resources in the municipalities

Better understand-ing of the dynamics of erosion, sedimentation, and pollution to orient control

Plans for integrated management of water and natural resources

Development of sanitary fills, aqueducts, and sewage treatment systems

Use of clean technologies

Environmental education invol-ving farmers, ranchers, and the general population

More research and strengthening of the SJRB information system

Water monitoring

Reduction of pollutants in the waters of the SJRB

Better water quality and availability

Improvement in the quality of life of the inhabitants and ecosystems of the SJRB


Table 2.6. High vulnerability to natural hazards.

Problem

Impact/
Stakeholders

Effect

Immediate Cause

Root Cause

Possible Solutions

Potential Transboundary Benefits

Lack of plans for the management of water and natural resources

Lack of disaster mitigation programs

Highly vulnerable economic and social infrastructure

Civil society in general

Local govern-ments

Civil defense

Government agencies

Regional bodies: CCAD, CRRH, CEPREDENAC, etc.

Increased vulnerability of social and economic infrastructure to natural hazards

Increase in disasters with the resulting loss of human lives and economic losses

Damage to ecosystems

Shorter floods recurrence periods

Increase of flooding areas

High risk of natural phenomena, such as volcanic eruptions, seismic activity, hurricanes, drought, flooding, and landslides

Deforestation

Unplanned human settlements

Inadequate road infrastructure

Lack of technical and financial resources

Overexploitation of forests

Nonsustainable agriculture (hillside agriculture, on unsuitable land using inappropriate technologies)

Extensive livestock rearing

Uncontrolled human migration

High population growth

Breakdown of the family structure

Hydroelectric projects without an environmental dimension

Institutional weaknesses

Plans for integrated watershed management

Plans for natural disaster mitigation

Early-warning and monitoring system

Tax incentives for proper management of natural resources

Establishment of regulations on soil use

Education and citizen participation

Natural disasters mitigation

Reduced vulnerability of the SJRB to natural hazards

Less loss of human lives and damage to economic and social infrastructure

Conservation of ecosystems and biodiversity


Table 2.7. Disintegration of social groups and uprooting from the territory.

Problem

Impact/

Stakeholders

Effect

Immediate Cause

Root Cause

Possible Solutions

Potential Transboundary Benefits

Breakdown of the family structure

High population growth

Local/foreign settlements

Deterioration in conditions of hygiene and sanitation

Poor development of environmental education processes

Civil society

Government agencies

Production is carried out with a short-term vision. Natural resources are neither protected nor conserved

Abandonment of the land in search of other options, with the resulting pressure on resources and habitats

Decline in the quality of life

Pressure on natural resources

Lack of sustainable economic resources

Transborder seasonal migration

Changes in productive culture

Loss of cultural identity

Delinquency and insecurity among citizens

Land holding instability

Relative imbalan-ces in job opportu-nities and generat-ion of income between border communities

Policy of encou-raging settlement

Reduced econo-mic options and credit to the inte-rior of the country

Natural phenomena

Weak environ-mental content in education programs

Low level of participation of institutions linked to the education sector

Low level of training of teachers in environmental issues

Profitable economic options for households in the SJRB

Strengthening of environmental education and moral values in the SJRB. Courses, workshops, schools and colleges

Improvement in conditions of hygiene and sanitation

Pooling of individual efforts

Improvement in the quality of life of the inhabitants of the SJRB

Improvement in health and education indexes

More sustainable economic alternatives

Recovery of the local economy in Nicaragua and Costa Rica

Table 2.8. Inadequate political, legal, and institutional framework for integrated management of the SJRB.

Problem

Impact/

Stakeholders

Effect

Immediate Cause

Root Cause

Possible Solutions

Potential Transboundary Benefits

Inadequate policies for integrated watershed management

Institutional weaknesses

Weak citizen participation mechanisms

Absence of precise agreements, programming, and coordination of actions and policies at the transborder level between Nicaragua and Costa Rica

Government agencies

Cooperation agencies

Local governments: Municipalities and environmental committees

Civil society

Development associations

Degradation of ecosystems

Threat to protected areas

Pollution of water resources and inappropriate exploitation of natural resources

Conflicts of use of the water and natural resources of the SJRB

There are no institutional or binational arrangements for the management of the SJRB

Limitations on the enforcement of legislation

Lack of financial resources

Weak links between the society and the government

Weak interinstitutional links

Changing and unintegrated environmental legislation

Weak technical and economic institutions

Lack of a clear understanding on the part of the governments of the importance of the SJRB

Binational technical cooperation for integrated management of water and natural resources of the SJRB

Strengthening of local government associations in the SJRB and federation of border municipalities

Active and effective participation of civil society

Legislation Harmonization of laws on water and environmental resources

Integrated management of water and natural resources and sustainable development of the SJRB


Table 2.9. Loss of economic potential in the SJRB.

Problem

Impact/

Stakeholders

Effect

Immediate Cause

Root Cause

Possible Solutions

Potential Transboundary Benefits

Low profitability of production

Separation from the local economy

Lack of financing, credit and investment

Little value added at the local, central, and regional levels

Lack of economic alternatives

Lack of a comprehensive vision (economic–ecological–social-cultural)

Little managerial capacity

Government institutions

Ranchers

Farmers

General population

Industry

Trade unions

Banks

Reduction in productivity

Reduction in aquatic flora and fauna

Reduction in the quality of life

Fishing. Reduction in commercial species

Changes in ecosystems

Pressure on and reduction of forest resources

Lack of development plans

Difficulties with gathering and marketing production

Erosion of agricultural land

Depletion of forestry products

Lack of technical assistance to farmers/Inappropriate agricultural practices

Insecurity of land holding

Lack of environmental education

Lack of agricultural planning

Adverse weather conditions

Lack of economic resources

Lack of controls and technology

No budget

Formulation of development plans and strategies

Feasible economic alternatives in the SJRB

Improvement of the systems for marketing products from the SJRB

Seeking alternatives that include value added in the products of the SJRB

Improvement in the socioeconomic conditions of the population

Credit for SJRB producers, under technical assistance

Less pressure on natural resources

SECTION 3

RELEVANT INFORMATION AND DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEMS

3.1Sources of degradation in the San Juan River Basin and its Coastal Zone

The SJRB comprises four subsystems: Lake Nicaragua, the San Juan River, the Indio-Maíz River Biological Reserve, and the Tortuguero Plains Conservation Area. These last two subsystems comprise four small but very important basins integrated naturally in the San Juan River hydrological system. These are the basins of the Indio and Maíz rivers in Nicaragua and Colorado and Tortuguero rivers in Costa Rica, shown on Map 1 of Annex 1.

The Lake Nicaragua subsystem--with a surface area of 23,848 km² from its headwaters to its outlet in the vicinity of San Carlos, source of the San Juan River--has three sectors with very different features:

  1. The sub-basins of the rivers on the eastern side, where the rivers go progressively from an intermittent flow to a permanent one as they approach the southern side, owing to increased rainfall.

  2. The sub-basins of the rivers on the western side, which are characterized by short distance courses and gradual slopes.

  3. The sub-basins of the rivers on the southern side, which originate in Costa Rican territory and only a part of their courses crosses Nicaraguan territory. This sector also includes several wetlands, habitat of migratory and local species of great ecological value. Caño Negro wetlands, a RAMSAR site, is among them.

In addition, although not included in the project area, Lake Managua, located on the northwest, has been connected at times with Lake Nicaragua.

The San Juan River subsystem is the only surface outlet from Lake Nicaragua. With a surface area of approximately 10,937 km², the San Juan River Basin has a climate characteristic of the area that drains in the Caribbean Sea, with annual average rainfall gradually increasing from 2,000 mm close to San Carlos to some 6,000 mm in North San Juan. This subsystem is divided into two sectors:

  1. North Sector, with an approximate surface area of 2,347 km², whose tributaries flow down from elevations of some 400 to 600 masl. All the rivers that flow into the San Juan River from this sector cross Nicaraguan territory only.

  2. South Sector, with a surface area of approximately 8,590 km², is the source of the main tributaries of the San Juan River. Some of these originate in the Costa Rican territory at elevations of some 3,000 masl, in the Central Volcanic Cordillera, and have more extensive drainage areas than the North Sector tributaries. This subsystem is characterized by steep slopes and high rainfall, which give the rivers a heavy flow.

The Indio-Maíz River Biological Reserve subsystem has a surface area of approximately 2,463 km² and is one of the areas in Nicaragua with the most biodiversity. However, is also one of the most fragile areas in the basin due to its ecological characteristics, which include very high rainfall, soils with limited capacity, and deficient drainage; an abundance of wetlands and water bodies; a predominance of extraordinarily diverse forests for which the conditions of exploitation are fragile, posing regeneration problems because of the close interconnectedness of its ecological systems through hydrological flows and environmental humidity; and its extraordinary biological diversity. Seven hundred forty-five plant species, 110 species of birds, 32 species of mammals, and over 32 species of crustaceans and fish have been identified within this subsystem. It is one of the national areas where virgin forest is preserved.

The Tortuguero Plains Conservation Area subsystem has a surface area of approximately 1,321 km². Like the Indio-Maíz River Biological Reserve, this area that falls within Costa Rican territory is one of the zones marked by the greatest biodiversity and ecological fragility in the South Sector of the Basin, owing to its ecological features. These features include: very high rainfall, soils with limited capacity, and deficient drainage; an abundance of wetlands and water bodies; a predominance of extraordinarily diverse forests for which the conditions of exploitation are fragile, posing regeneration problems because of the close interconnectedness of its ecological systems through hydrological flows and environmental humidity; and its extraordinary biological diversity.

This section of the TDA explains in detail the current and emerging environmental problems of the basin, as well as their causes. It should be noted, however, that the order in which these are presented in each case does not indicate either priority or the importance of the problems.

During the process of identification of the main current and emerging environmental problems, which limit, reduce, and/or pose a threat to the possibility of integrated management of water resources and the sustainable development of the SJRB, a number of issues were identified. As previously noted, these were grouped into eight categories. The first five represent the perceived major environmental problems, as shown in Table 1.1. The last three categories further explain the interactions (causes and effects) of institutional, social and economic aspects with the five major perceived problems. The problems grouped in these categories relate to:

  1. Soil degradation and sedimentation

  2. Ecosystem degradation

  3. Water quality

  4. Water resource use

  5. Overexploitation of natural resources

  6. Political, legal and Institutional framework for the integrated management of the SJRB.

  7. Economic development.

  8. Social areas.

3.1.1Problems related to soil degradation and sedimentation

Soil degradation directly affects the economy of producers due to the fact that it dramatically reduces their productivity as a direct consequence of the loss of the fertile layer of topsoil. Further, sedimentation, or processes related to the movement and deposition of eroded soils within the hydrologic system, affects processes like increased turbidity, color, and other processes that are strictly mechanical in nature, such as erosion, and silting up of the river beds and other water bodies and coastal zones. The sedimentation processes make the river waters turbid, preventing sunlight from penetrating and limiting the production of primary producers (plants) for aquatic life to consume. This affects the reproduction and survival of some economic species, including fish. In the coastal zone, sedimentation affects the populations of reefs, ecosystems that involve and are crucially important to the reproduction of marine species with a high commercial value.

The soil of the basin is fertile and can be farmed using mechanized agricultural techniques. Generally speaking, the soil in the North of Costa Rica and the area bordering Lake Nicaragua and the eastern part of the Basin is poorly drained in the lower areas, with drainage improving at higher altitudes. The volcanic characteristics of the region have provided soils with a high content of ash, hence richer. However, the natural processes of erosion and soil loss, compounded by inappropriate (unsustainable) agricultural practices, inappropriate forestry techniques, and the lack of soil and water conservation practices have resulted in major losses of fertile topsoil in different parts of the basin. Similarly, erosion is accompanied by a decline in the replenishment of aquifers which, in addition to reducing the availability of underground water, alters the hydrological regime of water bodies, producing greater and increasingly frequent floods during the rainy season and low flow rates during the dry season. Changes in land use, without taking into account its potential, such as the extension of commercial agriculture and overexploitation of forests for wood exacerbate the erosion problems facing the SJRB. In much less degree, traditional land clearing practices in preparation for agricultural work, such as slash and burn practices, are also contributors to the increase of erosion processes in the SJRB.

The sedimentation process affects the basin’s water resources to a large extent, both in terms of the quality and in terms of its aquatic flora and fauna. However, it is not possible to quantify this problem because there is very little information available on the environment of the entire SJRB. Historically, the San Juan River has undergone a natural process of sedimentation, which has led to discharges through two sites: the North San Juan Bay or Lagoon in Nicaragua, which is high in sediment, and the mouth of the Colorado River in Costa Rica, which produces the highest flow rate discharge. Nevertheless, the upper and mid-level parts of the San Carlos River sub-basin are the most critical in terms of sedimentation, mainly because they have volcanic soil associated with a mountainous terrain, very rugged residual soil, hilly residual terrain, in addition to torrential rainfall and inappropriate soil use.

The particular production of sediment in suspension in this portion of the Basin has been determined at the Terrón Colorado station, where the figures reached 817 ton/km2/year; at the Peñas Blancas station, the figures were 700 ton/km2/year; and at the Puerto Viejo and Veracruz stations on the Sarapiquí River where the figures are close to 216 ton/km²/year. While these latter figures are significantly lower than those assessed for the San Carlos River basin, they are significant in terms of turbidity. According to comments from farmers in the Los Chiles canton, about 15,000 hectares of soil are farmed using mechanized agricultural techniques each year for crop development. Erosion is reported to be visible in these agricultural areas, and production is reported to be decreasing.

The upper part of the Frío River sub-basin has residual soils with hilly relief and a high risk of erosion, compounded by the implementation of unsustainable agricultural practices in the area, which excludes soil and water conservation practices. The specific production of sediment calculated at the Guatuso station was 298 ton/km²/year and 181 ton/km²/year at the Venado station. These amounts are less than the input from the San Carlos River sub-basin but have the same implications for turbidity.

The upper part of the Zapote River sub-basin is made up of very rugged residual soil and very shallow soil on mountainous terrain. The sediment transported in this sub-basin is deposited at the outlet of Lake Nicaragua, where the San Juan River is formed. Although the turbidity of the waters indicates a high level of solids in suspension, the specific production of sediment in this sub-basin has not been estimated because no information is available.

In the north of the San Juan River subsystem, overuse of the soil by the extension of commercial agriculture, overexploitation of forests for wood, weather, land, and topographic conditions combine to cause severe erosion by water in certain areas, which affects the sustainability of the resources in the zone and increases the transport of sediment toward the San Juan River basin. The zones considered to be critical areas in this sector of the sub-basin are the Negra, Sábalos and Santa Cruz rivers. There are no measurements of the sediment deposited in these rivers, hence the inability to quantify the specific sediment deposits.

Lake Nicaragua acts as a reservoir for sediment and a sink for most of the pollutants that reach its waters; because of the large size of the lake, much of the sediment that reaches it is deposited there and does not reach the San Juan River. Also, because of the lake’s great dilution capacity, the concentration of pollutants is considerably reduced. The problems of erosion and of sediment carried to the lake are significant, mainly due to deforestation and the practice of unsustainable agriculture, even though it does not reach the levels indicated for the former sub-basins. This is fundamentally due to the fact that the terrain is less rugged and rainfall levels are lower.

Nevertheless, as a result of this situation, many tons of soil are lost annually, thereby diminishing the productivity of agricultural land through the loss of fertile topsoil as a result of the rains.

The same situation occurs in livestock rearing, in which case the erosion caused by water is accentuated by the movement of herds through pastures, since most of these farms rear stock on a large scale and do not practice livestock rotation. This is exacerbated by the general practice of turning forestry land into pastures.

Erosion by water also seriously affects rural roads, resulting in bad roads for marketing agricultural products, thereby increasing the price of transporting products to markets. Quite often, it is not possible to get production to retail outlets, causing severe economic losses for producers. In the Lake Nicaragua subsystem, these problems of erosion by water occur on the slopes of the Mombacho volcano, and extend to the vicinity of Nandaime, in the sub-basins of the Ochomogo, Malacatoya, Tecolostote, Mayales, and Acoyapa rivers. However, the specific production of sediment in this subsystem has not been estimated, as the necessary information is not available. Additional, inappropriate road design and construction also contributes to the acceleration of the erosion processes.

The sediment from the upper and middle sectors of the basin rises mainly through the San Carlos and Sarapiquí rivers. Human activities exacerbate this natural process. Comparing aerial photographs taken in different years, one observes islets formed during the past five years as a result of the sedimentation process. It is well known that during the dry season, places in the San Juan River are not navigable by the small craft or rowboats used to transport people in the region, owing to the heavy sedimentation taking place. The soil degradation process becomes more acute as a result of population pressure. As population growth is high, wider areas are claimed for unsustainable agricultural activities. The construction of waterworks like dams or microdams, and mining, without incorporating the environmental variable, places additional stress on the fragile land and accelerates erosion processes.

At the transboundary level, sedimentation is a major problem given that the accelerated erosion process that is occurring in the basin affects the San Juan river and the coastal area of the basin, due to the fact that these areas receive the sediment. To halt, reduce, and control this erosion process, and consequently reduce the problems caused by sedimentation, it is necessary to develop soil and water conservation programs that would allow for the integration of these practices into the agricultural activities being developed in the basin. The creation of tax incentives for those producers who appropriately manage natural resources could be a motivation to halt and control the erosion and sedimentation process occurring in the SJRB.

Land use planning and the preparation of plans for basin management are also necessary. These plans should seek to develop socioeconomic activities based on land use capacity, and encourage the acquisition of more precise information on the dynamics of erosion, sedimentation, and pollution of water bodies, as guidelines for control. These actions can hardly be successful without the involvement of producers and civil society as a whole, through environmental education programs, the creation of economic alternatives, and the development of monitoring and information systems that provide a better awareness of the actions being advocated.

3.1.2Problems related to ecosystem degradation

The degradation of ecosystems is an environmental problem that diminishes the capacity of species to survive. This degradation occurs in different ways and is manifested in a reduction in the richness of the ecosystems as well as their biological diversity, and in the goods and services they can offer, thereby affecting indigenous and/or migratory species. The degradation of ecosystems due to overexploitation of their resources, though serving a short-term economic goal, has had direct negative effects on social welfare in the medium and long terms. As long as the ecosystem is not degraded, it represents a source of wealth for society, hence the importance of keeping it in good condition.

One of the main causes that contributes to the degradation of ecosystems is the deforestation due to the advance of the agriculture frontier and inappropriate forest exploitation. More lands are deforested for commercial agriculture and live-stock rearing, and due to overexploitation of forest for wood and energy. In Nicaragua deforestation rates reach over 150,000 hectares per year and in Costa Rica over 18,500 hectares per year.

At a lower scale, another problem is the uncontrolled fires used to prepare land for agricultural activities or to remove forest for the development of stock rearing areas. This practice eliminates the organic covering of the land, making it more susceptible to erosion by both wind and water. In addition, the fires cause health problems and detract from the aesthetic value of the landscape.

Accidental or natural fires are another case in point. They affect areas of natural forest. In the Upala and Los Chiles cantons, in Costa Rica, some 10,000 hectares were burned between 1998 and 1999. This problem is even more serious in the Nicaraguan territory of the basin. Equipment is lacking and communities need to be organized to control these fires as one of the main barriers to the burning of large areas.

The construction of roads without proper drainage measures or in territories subject to penetration and settlement are high-stress factors for ecosystems, especially those which are highly fragile as a result of their weather conditions and the nature of their soil and water.

Mining and the extraction of construction materials without taking measures to cushion the impact cause drastic changes in the natural landscape while degrading its valuable ecosystems.

Wetlands are very fragile ecosystems that are being severely affected, causing a reduction in the number and diversity of the species of terrestrial flora, birds, reptiles, mammals, fish, and crustaceans. This problem results from excessive exploitation of wildlife species either to feed the population, to trade their furs, or to trade live species, and from sedimentation, which causes changes in water quality, thereby significantly affecting the reproduction of aquatic species that live and/or reproduce in the wetlands.

The SJRB wetlands are very valuable ecosystems, which regulate the hydrological cycle and provide food and shelter for hundreds of species, including large quantities of migratory birds. One major cause of the deterioration of this ecosystem is the draining of wide areas of wetlands to give access to agricultural zones or human settlements. Aerial photographs of the Caño Negro sector show how the pools of water have diminished over time, due in part to the drainage of wetlands for agricultural purposes and to the sedimentation occurring in recent years in the basin. Owing to the deterioration of these areas and the pressure of the neighboring communities on the use of the natural resources of the wetlands, it is necessary to draw up management plans to outline the socioeconomic characteristics of users and guidelines for usage, since people are highly dependent on these resources for their survival. A large portion of the ecological problems of the wetlands is due to ignorance of their benefits.

The use of inappropriate fishing techniques endangers the existence of certain species, altering the food chain of aquatic fauna and consequently deteriorating the aquatic ecosystems. This is the case of the bull shark that is now hard to find in Lake Nicaragua or in the San Juan River. In some cases, the introduction of exotic species endangers the existence of indigenous species with a high cultural value. Such is the case of the guapote, whose numbers are being reduced by the introduction of tilapias. The deterioration of ecosystems is exacerbated by the lack of an institutional presence in the territory, be it for technical or economic reasons, or a combination of both. As a result, laws on the regulation and control of natural resource use are not enforced. The participation of civil society in controlling the use and exploitation of natural resources is limited and, in many cases, very timid or markedly apathetic.

One aspect that has not been evaluated in the degradation of the ecosystems is the incidence of different phenomena on these systems. The geographic location of the SJRB and the various geographic accidents encountered there render it susceptible to the impact of various events of this kind. In the SJRB there are a number of active volcanoes, which spew gas and ash causing damage to the plant life, the soil, polluting water bodies, and causing severe damage to entire populations. These volcanoes include the Masaya, the Maderas, and the Irazú. Another natural phenomenon in the SJRB is landslides which, though located in specific areas, cause damage to the ecosystems, the soil, pollute water bodies, damage infrastructure and entire settlements. The Maderas volcano on the island Ometepe is a case in point.

Similarly, during the last century, the SJRB has suffered the destructive effects of at least three hurricanes which, with their heavy rainfall, cause flooding damaging ecosystems, eroding soil, diverting river courses, causing severe damage to infrastructure and entire populations, resulting in the loss of human lives. Other natural phenomena that have caused damage to the ecosystems of the SJRB are the droughts that have occurred as a result of the El Niño and seismic activity, which have changed river courses, particularly in the case of the Tipitapa River that provided a permanent connection between the Managua and Nicaragua lakes. As a result of an earthquake during the last century, the riverbed rose in a certain sector cutting off the existing connection between the two lakes.

The degradation of the ecosystems makes the economic and social infrastructure of the SJRB more vulnerable and increases the potential impact on the population. This vulnerability is reflected in shorter periods between the occurrence of floods or droughts and the soil becomes more unstable. Possible solutions to the problem of deterioration of the ecosystems include developing formal and informal environmental education programs to make farmers more aware of their actions; increasing enforcement of the existing legislation; promoting proper natural resource management; and promoting the organization of grassroots groups to control burning from the outset. To prevent or mitigate the damage caused by extreme conditions, such as flooding and droughts and other effects of natural phenomena, it is necessary to set up and early warning system about possible swelling of water bodies and to monitor hydrometeorological behavior. It is also necessary to set up a seismographic network to monitor the behavior of volcanoes and tectonic faults. Similarly, social organization is necessary to design and test emergency plans for natural phenomena, to reduce the damage they cause.

Institutions responsible for the control and regulation of natural resource use must be strengthened, both technically and economically, and be given the means for their mobilization. This would enable them to have a real presence in the territory. It is also necessary to create mechanisms for enforcing the current legislation.

3.1.3Problems related to water quality

The lack of a historical series of basic data on the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the basin’s waters makes it impossible to interpret results on the quality of the waters with any reasonable degree of accuracy and coverage. From studies conducted by the CIRA/UNAN in Lake Nicaragua in 1993 and 1994, the lake was found to have oligomesotrophic characteristics. It was found that the supply of oxygen dissolved into the lake through photosynthetic processes was very low, and that the oxygenation of a great portion of the water mass was mechanical, mainly due to the supply of atmospheric oxygen by the wind and rainfall, and by simple diffusion through the interface of water and air. Nevertheless, this study indicated that the possibility of eutrophication in areas receiving chemical and biological pollutants from discharges of municipal and industrial waste water should not be disregarded, as shown by the concentrations of phosphorous which were present at high levels of between 50 and 62 mg/l (62 and 50 g/l in March and April 1993, respectively). Agricultural activities carried out in the drainage area of the lake were also reported to contribute to erosion, increasing turbidity and the concentration of insecticides and agrochemicals in the waters of the lake and its runoff.

From the information in Tables 2 and 3 of Annex 3, the waters of the lake were found to have the following characteristics:

Analysis of sediment taken from Lake Nicaragua showed levels of pesticides in excess of the amounts permitted for the protection of fresh water organisms. This situation must be studied in greater depth given the impact that pesticides can have on the quality of the water in the lake and its ecosystem.

One source of pollution of Lake Nicaragua that has not been evaluated is the possible runoff from Lake Managua into Lake Nicaragua, through the Tipitapa River when the water from Lake Managua rises to 41.30 masl. During this century, this transfer has occurred on four occasions: in 1933 when it reached its highest historical level (43.44 masl), in 1955 when it reached the second highest level (42.36 masl), in 1982, and in October 1998 when, as a result of Hurricane Mitch, it rose to 42.10 masl. During the last episode, the volume of water transferred increased with the rainy season in 1999, when the waters of Lake Managua reached a height of 42.17 masl in mid-October. This extreme elevation is expected to exceed the 1955 level before the current rainy season is over, increasing the flow of water to Lake Nicaragua even further. According to the figures published by the Nicaraguan Institute of Territorial Studies, the current flow rate of the runoff is some 80 m³/sec. These flows are polluted by municipal and industrial wastewater and solid waste from Managua; by a natural salination process, which increases with the accelerated erosion in the drainage basin; and by the runoff of agricultural chemicals used in farming. In 1990, the concentration of dissolved salt was some 1,400 mg/l; in 1972 the concentration was less than 1,000 mg/l. Studies also indicate the presence of heavy metals in samples of water and in fish taken from the lake. It should be noted that a very important action in the Lake Managua sanitation program promoted by the government is the construction of a spillway to regulate the outflow of water from this lake to Lake Nicaragua and maintain the volume of Lake Managua at a prescribed level. With the building of this spillway, there would be a constant outflow of the polluted waters of Lake Managua into Lake Nicaragua through the Tipitapa River. The environmental impact of this work has not yet been evaluated.

In respect of the San Juan River, the studies carried out by CIRA/UNAN show that the turbidity of the water, which prevents the sunlight from penetrating, has inhibited the production of phytoplankton. The low levels of primary productivity and limited biomass as expressed by chlorophyll-a concentrations were observed at their lowest levels in the Sarapiquí River and at their highest levels in the San Juan River delta. The latter site had the highest total concentration of phosphorous and above-average levels of nitrate. From the information in Table 4 of Annex 3 it can be deduced that the waters of the San Juan River have the following characteristics:

Erosion by water is a problem in most areas of the basin. Owing to the heavy rainfall, parts of the soil act like liquids and are lost as a resource, being transported to, and deposited in the receiving rivers, thereby diminishing the quality of the water both for consumption and for aquatic flora and fauna. Soil erosion also transports the fertilizers and pesticides used in agricultural activities and the contaminants leached from municipal and industrial solid wastes, which are usually deposited in open dumps within settlements and in the industrial zones located in the SJRB. The final disposal and proper management of wastes is a problem in most of the urban centers in the SJRB. Few centers have adequate disposal facilities for solid wastes, although Ciudad Quesada, the largest urban center on the Costa Rican side of the SJRB, does have a sanitary fill. Technical studies on pollution, particularly on leachates which could have a negative effect on the environment and on surface and ground waters, are lacking. In Nicaragua, the towns located in the basin that produce the largest volumes of solid waste are Granada, Masaya, Rivas, Boaco, Juigalpa and San Carlos. In the small towns, the garbage collection system is deficient and trash is usually dumped in open areas. It is rarely removed or covered, resulting in putrid odors and a proliferation of flies and other problems. Only 32% of the population in the basin has a solid waste collection system. The majority of the scattered, rural population mostly digs pits for its solid waste. In most cases, when the pits fill up, they are set alight or sometimes covered and new ones dug to dump more trash. In some cases, the solid waste is dumped directly on the ground or in riverbeds and gullies. There is generally little awareness or education about solid waste disposal; everywhere trash can be found on the ground, on the roads, and in rivers. In the larger centers in the Nicaraguan sector of the basin, garbage collection systems cover about 45% of the population. In all cases, the solid waste collected is dumped in open areas. There are very few towns in which solid waste is used to produce organic fertilizer.

The excessive use of pesticides is a general problem in most agricultural activities. With the exception of subsistence agriculture, agricultural chemicals are widely used. In the project area, 92% of the farmers are small farmers. Subsistence agriculture represents only 6.5% of the surface area and does not use significant quantities of agricultural chemicals for economic reasons. Likewise, the excessive use of fertilizers can have negative effects on both surface and ground water sources. As a result of the deposition of nitrogenous fertilizers in water bodies, the aquatic flora multiplies causing ecological imbalances with negative consequences (including high consumption of oxygen as the organisms die and decompose) within the aquatic ecosystem. This problem is caused in part by the exhaustion of the natural fertility of the soil and its continued use, requiring the artificial supply of the nutrients necessary for normal crop development. Due to the fact that the regulations related to the use of pesticides and fertilizers are very weak or nonexistent, these agrochemicals are used irrationally, far in excess of the real demands of cultivation, with inefficient application and poor handling. This affects the biota in general, polluting the surface and ground waters, and creating occupational health problems. On the other hand, there are crops in the basin area that require high agrochemical use, such as bananas, vegetables, root crops, and sugar cane. Table 5 of Annex 3 shows the main crops produced in the SJRB and the most widely used chemicals. The geographic areas where this situation occurs are mostly the wetlands, Malacatoya, Medio Queso, Guacalillo, Ochomogo, Palo Ralos, Río Zapote, where banana plants (Pococí), citrus (San Carlos CR) and sugar cane, common to a number of localities in the basin, are grown.

Industrial wastewater has traditionally been a problem both in Nicaragua and in Costa Rica. The lack of norms to regulate effluents from industries and institutional weaknesses (technical and financial) have severely limited the ability to oblige industries to treat their wastewater. In many cases, because there are no controls on these waters, companies do not use treatment techniques that would raise production and operating costs. Businessmen view this measure as an expense and not as a requirement for sustainable development. Given the range of industrial operations in the basin, the composition of wastewaters may vary considerably depending on the type of industry. In most industries, these waters have been diverted to the rivers and streams to save economic resources. The critical points where the problem of pollution with industrial waste water arises are in the capitals of cantons and major municipalities, where industries are established, the banana-growing areas, fishing zones, sugar plantations, coffee plantations, and citrus and dairy processing plants.

In Costa Rica, attempts have been made to control this situation. Coffee plantations, for example, have made strides in the treatment of their wastewater with oxidation lagoons. Cane plantations, slaughterhouses, pig farms, and other businesses are doing the same. The discharge from these companies is analyzed by the Ministry of Health, which establishes ranges for different substances and compounds, though it faces serious restrictions in terms of controlling effluents. The Ministry of Environment and Energy, MINAE, is responsible for the administration of water resources within the entire national territory of Costa Rica, through. the Department of Waters located at the National Meteorological Institute.

In Nicaragua, MARENA is responsible for controlling pollution through the General Directorate of Environmental Quality. The Ministry of Health and the INAA focus on the quality of the water supply for human consumption. The CIRA is a specialized center of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua (UNAN), which has laboratories for various analyses of water quality. There is a National Water Resource Commission to coordinate these activities.

The most densely populated towns in the SJRB are Masaya, Granada, Boaco, Juigalpa and San Carlos. Ciudad Quesada is the largest urban area on the Costa Rican side. The Nicaraguan urban population in the basin makes up 45% of the total (354,834 inhabitants), while on the Costa Rican side, the urban population amounts to 32% (91,530 inhabitants) of the total. As a result, both rural and urban wastewater volumes are significant, resulting in a high pollution potential; the same can be said for human excrement. The major urban centers have sewage treatment systems. Most of the rural population lacks the minimal basic sanitation services and conditions. The problem of wastewater is accentuated due to the unplanned spread of human settlements, which have no basic services whatsoever and so increase the stress on the existing ones. An analysis conducted by the WHO (World Health Organization) concludes that the Nicaraguan sector of the basin, because of its denser population, can potentially generate some 3.5 to 7.7 times more municipal wastewater pollution than the Costa Rican sector of the basin. Table 6 of Annex 3 estimates the pollution potential of the human settlements based in the basin.

Actions to help improve the quality of surface and ground waters include the promotion of programs on soil conservation, integrated pest management, construction of proper sanitary fills, and treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater. It will also be necessary to develop technical assistance programs for the management and use of agricultural chemicals and their dangers to health and the environment. Other actions include technical assistance, refraining from the use of fertilizers in zones near rivers, reforestation or regeneration of the natural vegetation on river banks, reduction in the dosage of fertilizers or their application in smaller doses, covering the fertilizer to prevent it from being washed away by rain, and establishing environmental education programs indicating the negative effects of fertilizers on the environment and aquatic ecosystems, both fresh water and marine. It is necessary to develop systematic programs to monitor the quality of water in order to verify the progress made in controlling the pollution of water bodies. In addition, research programs are required to better ascertain the dynamics of erosion, sedimentation, and pollution and so provide guidelines for their control. Other actions that will help mitigate and control this problem are the development of plans and strategies for integrated management of water resources and other natural resources.

3.1.4Problems related to water resource use

Lake Nicaragua is one of the largest reservoirs of fresh water in the Americas. Its outflow through the San Juan River (averaging 475 m³/sec), as well as its capacity for storage, high water quality, its geographic location, and its connection with the Caribbean Sea through the San Juan River are features that render it attractive for a number of purposes, such as navigation, energy production, irrigation, potable water supply, tourism, recreation, and fishing, to name the principal ones. For many years, transportation on the San Juan River and Lake Nicaragua has been an important factor in the socioeconomic and political development of Nicaragua. Interest in the construction of an inter-oceanic route tapping the potential of the San Juan River and Lake Nicaragua dates back to Spanish colonial times. The first historical data records that the San Juan River and Lake Nicaragua were used to transport the riches discovered on the western coasts of South America and shipped to Spain during the conquest of the continent. History shows that since 1504, Nicaragua has made over 10 attempts to construct an inter-oceanic canal. To date, however, none of the projects has come to fruition.

With the discovery of gold in California (1848), transiting North Americans sought a faster route to the gold mines through the San Juan River and Lake Nicaragua. Reports from that time indicate that in 1853 some 20,800 traveled from the East Coast to the West Coast of the United States using that route. Other data show that at that time some 2,000 passengers were transported via that route on a monthly basis. However, an earthquake that occurred in July 1863 increased sedimentation in the San Juan River mouth, greatly increasing the difficulties of navigating that part of the river. Later, the construction of the transcontinental railway across the US in 1869 put an end to the great demand for passenger transport through Nicaragua.

Nevertheless, at the beginning of this century, interest in commercial navigation through Lake Nicaragua resumed. Of the studies conducted since the 1900s on the construction of an inter-oceanic canal, the following are noteworthy:

Further projects related to the construction of an inter-oceanic canal have been presented more recently, using either the waters of the San Juan River and Lake Nicaragua or building a railway connecting the Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean, or a combination of the two.

A number of boats operated on Lake Nicaragua and in the San Juan River and its tributaries, facilitate the trading of goods with the Pacific region of the country and the transport of passengers to towns located in the western sector of the lake and in the Pacific zone. In some communities like North San Juan, existing water-based transportation routes between communities in Costa Rica is well known. Practically all the trade in between these communities takes place through Puerto Viejo in the Sarapiquí canton. Also, emergency medical attention and sometimes other basic services, such as telephone communications with Nicaragua and education, are obtained through Costa Rica, along the waterways.

The main port facilities located in the SJRB are the following: San Juan del Norte, El Castillo, and Sábalos, located on the San Juan River; Granada, San Jorge, San Carlos, and San Miguelito, located on the banks of Lake Nicaragua; and Moyogalpa, Altagracia, and Solentiname, located on Ometepe Island and in the Solentiname Archipelago, respectively. Los Chiles, Puerto Viejo, and Barra Colorado are ports situated on the tributaries flowing from the southern sector of the basin. A feasibility study of the local transportation system in Lake Nicaragua and in the San Juan River conducted in 1970 found that the economic and financial benefit of the project was positive. Since then, however, there have been no new estimates on local navigation in these water bodies.

Navigation on the San Juan River and in Lake Nicaragua are affected by the progressive sedimentation of both water bodies. Navigation is also an important source of pollution of the water resources, due to the fact that boats are washed and serviced in both water bodies. The waterbodies, therefore, become depositaries of hydrocarbon residue, agricultural chemicals, basic grains, pigs, domesticated animals, and other products that are transported across these bodies of water.

The basin’s water resources have great potential for hydroelectric generation. The considerable flow rates, combined with significant altitude changes within the basin, have led to the development of this type of project in the SJRB. To date, there are four known hydroelectric development proposals to use the average flow rate at which Lake Nicaragua empties into the San Juan River as the source of the power supply. None of these options have been discarded as yet. The projects are: Tipitapa-Tamarindo, Brito, Brito Residual, and Interlagos.

The construction of any of these projects will mean substantive changes in the average flow rate of the San Juan River, reducing it by some 36%. This will undoubtedly have a strong impact on navigation in the river. Aspects to be considered if these projects are implemented should be their effects on the aquatic life in the San Juan River and Lake Nicaragua, the flora and fauna existing in the area to be inundated by the proposed dams, and the environmental impact that will result from all the associated construction works.

In addition to the large projects discussed above, there are currently several public and private hydroelectric projects in the southern sector of the SJRB, which are at different stages of development. The private projects are approved by the ICE and carried out by private firms.

The possible conflicts in water use are one of the aspects evoked whenever an option for hydroelectric power or inter-oceanic canal construction is presented, especially since between 300 and 400 m³/sec of the existing river flows abstracted to meet the requirements for potable water and irrigation water supplying suitable farmland in the Pacific Region of Nicaragua.

On the banks of lakes Managua and Nicaragua and in the León-Chinandega plain, there are 742,000 hectares of land suitable for irrigation (152,000 ha in the Lake Managua zone, 432,000 ha in the area of Lake Nicaragua, and 158,000 distributed in the León-Chinandega area). The potential, available water in the León-Chinandega plain and along the banks of the lakes is approximately 745 MMC. This volume could provide the water supply to irrigate approximately 138,000 ha, resulting in a shortfall in the amount needed to irrigate some 600,000 ha. To make up for this shortfall, a number of different alternative projects have been proposed, all of them drawing on Lake Nicaragua as the source. The most recent study, “Irrigation Strategy for Pacific Nicaragua”, envisaged damming the waters of the San Juan River at San Isidro, maintaining the water level of Lake Managua at 32 masl, draining water from Lake Nicaragua into Lake Managua by constructing a canal on the Tipitapa River, and pumping the water available up to the 100 masl mark. This scheme would then irrigate, using gravity, the 600,000 ha needing irrigation that are below this elevation. This project envisages generating power through the Tamarindo River, the replenishing of Lake Managua and the provision of drinking water supplies to towns requiring this service, including Managua.

Like the hydroelectric projects, this project will change the average flow rate of the San Juan River, which, in turn, will impact heavily on navigation of the river. Aspects to be considered with this project should be the effects on aquatic life related to the San Juan River, lakes Nicaragua and Managua, the existing flora and fauna in the area to be flooded by the proposed dam, and the environmental impact of the construction and all related works. There is conflict in the use of water for this irrigation project because, the wider the area irrigated, the less water available for power generation and the drinking water supply.

Though the drinking water supply is a problem in the basin, it does not place any particular pressure on the resource because of the size of the demand. However, municipal and industrial wastewater does indeed pose a threat to water quality. Due to the fact that most of the population deposits its used water in riverbeds, streams, or directly in the lake or river with no prior treatment, the quality of the water of those bodies of water has noticeably deteriorated. Critical points are San Miguelito, San Jorge, Granada, Juigalpa, San Carlos, El Castillo, Sábalos and San Juan del Norte.

3.1.5Problems related to the over-exploitation of natural resources

The overexploitation of natural resources is one of the major environmental problems in the SJRB. It results from the combination of economic, social, and institutional factors. These problems arise from the overexploitation of species with a high commercial value, without taking into account the breeding periods, size and population of the species, and/or their appropriate use, as in the case of the land. Table 7 of Annex 3 shows the main threats to biodiversity and presents specific recommendations for addressing them. These threats result in reductions in the populations of flora and fauna below viable levels sometimes and below commercial levels at times. This has considerable transboundary effect, because the species know no borders and are exploited in both Costa Rica and Nicaragua. Although the SJRB has been fished for long time, and mostly in ecological equilibrium with the existing populations, signs that the balance is being undermined are surfacing and reducing both the number and biological diversity of the species.

Subsistence fishing predominated for a long time, but now is being combined with commercial fishing. There are now markets for different fresh water and salt water species in both Nicaragua and Costa Rica. Although poorly regulated, there are certain regulations governing fishing in the San Juan River, such as prohibitions on the use of trammel nets. Few data have been collected on the techniques used in the marine environment. Fishing in this basin has been artisanal and indiscriminate, with no knowledge of the renewal capacity of species. Both in the rivers and in the coastal marine areas, fishing is carried out with no awareness of population dynamics, there is little institutional presence in the zone, and specialized techniques are hardly used. This is due to the lack of institutional resources to supervise the proper use of fishing resources, in terms of the cultural, geographic, and historical aspects. In both countries, Nicaragua and Costa Rica, there is little supervision of the coastal marine zone, resulting in anarchic situations in fisheries in both countries. This situation is exacerbated by the fact that there are few studies on the population dynamics of the various species with economic value to the people living in the zone.

In the case of turtles, the regulations include, for example, limiting the number of individuals that can fish them per year. But these figures are not respected and there are always fishermen who evade the authorities to obtain their catch. Despite the existence of specific prohibitions to prevent the marketing of turtles and their parts, these are sold quite freely on local markets, creating a culture of consumption of this type of food.

Owing to the lack of control and police presence, situations arise that threaten the safety of fishermen, who in some cases are victims of robberies of equipment, such as trammel nets, electronic floats, etc. Foreign craft take advantage of this situation to fish without the necessary permits. Inappropriate fishing techniques are used specifically in Barra del Colorado, Tortuguero, the upper basin of the San Juan River, Solentiname, Guatusos, the Frío River and the entire coastal zone of the basin. The main species subject to overexploitation are lobsters, fresh water shrimp, guapote, shad, sea bass, gaspar, alligators, manatees, green and carey turtles—though some regulations have been established for the hunting and exploitation of the latter. Sharks and swordfish are endangered species in the waters of Lake Nicaragua and the San Juan River, as a result of trammel net fishing in the Colorado River, which prevents them from reaching Lake Nicaragua from the Caribbean Sea via the San Juan River. The areas where this problem is particularly acute vary depending on the species, since each species is observed in its own habitat. For example, the swordfish is fished in Barra del Colorado, at the mouth of the San Juan and the Ometepe; crocodiles are found in Barra del Colorado; sharks in Barra del Colorado, the mouth of the San Juan River, Ometepe and Zapatera. Green turtles are found on the Continental Shelf and in Tortuguero. Shads are fished in Caño Negro, Ometepe, the Frío and Sábalos rivers; sea bass is fished in Barra del Colorado, Tortuguero, and the Pocosol River.

The coasts of both countries in the sector covered by the project are for the most part under some kind of protective regime, though these areas do not include the marine zone per se. As a tentative solution, one might consider breeding in captivity species like the turtle and alligator, for subsequent release into the wild. Agouti (Dasyprocta punctata) and paca (Agouti paca) are being bred in captivity commercially in some areas of the SJRB, thereby relieving the pressure on their natural environment. Some habitats have been reconstructed, such as that of the red lapa, which is being reared with a view to releasing specimens. It is also necessary to conduct research on the population dynamics of species with economic value and to regulate their exploitation. However, nothing will come of this unless the communities become actively involved in solving the problem.

Like aquatic fauna, land-dwelling wildlife is under threat in most of the basin, with the exception of some protected areas that are properly supervised. Part of the problem can be attributed to the destruction and degradation of habitats. Table 8 of Annex 3 shows a list of some of the species largely present in the SJRB. Table 9 of Annex 3 shows the protected areas of the basin together and their main permitted uses. Tables 10 and 11 of Annex 3 show the protected areas of the SJRB, indicating which ones are in Costa Rican or Nicaraguan territory.

Hunting is a problem everywhere in the basin, mainly in the rural areas, in the mountains, and even in some protected areas. It is practiced without any knowledge of the population dynamics of wildlife. There are hunting bans or periods of protection for some species, which are often not respected by hunters. Some birds like the lapas are protected, as are the almond trees in which they nest. Even so, they are still the prey of hunters, who traffic in wild species, particularly in Pococí and San Carlos (Costa Rica). In Nicaragua, different types of birds are also hunted to be kept in captivity and marketed. Trafficking in wildlife species is common in the basin. The respective authorities try to curtail such trafficking, but the persons responsible for such acts evade the law and sell the wildlife for pets, consumption, or for their feathers and skins.

The transboundary effect becomes one in which the basin’s wildlife in general is being depleted for a number of reasons, with the resulting impoverishment of the species making up the ecosystem and the quality of life of the inhabitants. This is the case of the lapas, turtles, manatees, etc. Some of the possible solutions are environmental education to encourage consumption of species reared on farms; studies of population dynamics and hunting using scientific knowledge; imposition of sanctions on persons trading or trafficking in wild animals; proper supervision of protected areas and the economic resources to ensure effective supervision.

Regarding forestry resources, throughout the SJRB this resource has been overexploited for various reasons, from plowing mountains for agriculture and livestock farming, to the felling of timber and firewood as a useful resource. The extraction of timber is the start of a series of problems, such as the opening of roads through virgin forest, noise, pressure on plant and animal resources, and the subsequent establishment of agricultural and human settlements. When these situations arise, habitats are fragmented and some species do not survive.

In the institutional environment, the problem is that, despite the proliferation of legislation on natural, forestry, and environmental resources existing in both countries, few laws are implemented or have effective enforcement mechanisms due to the lack of economic and financial resources. In Nicaragua, forest mass is reduced by 150,000 hectares every year. According to recent data, deforestation in Costa Rica is running at 18,500 hectares per year. This pressure is mainly a result of the increased demand for timber for industry and energy production, the expansion of agriculture and livestock, and the establishment of human settlements. The supply of cut wood in the project area is shown in Table 12 of Annex 3. Similarly, Tables 13 and 14 of Annex 3 show the demand for cut wood for industrial purposes in the Nicaraguan and Costa Rican sectors of the basin, respectively.

In terms of dendroenergy, in Nicaragua, 2.5 times more wood is used for firewood than for industry. In 1991, 35% of the national territory suffered a deficit in the supply of firewood, facing situations qualified as extremely critical. In Costa Rica, the situation is not as critical because there are other sources of power, such as hydroenergy, which cover 90% of the demand. Notwithstanding, in rural areas, 37% of households use firewood as a source of energy.

The main areas where precious woods are exploited are in the settlements in IDA, Boca de Sábalos, the border zones, and Camastro. The energy-producing woods are consumed in the upper part of the basin and the banks of the San Juan River. The demand for wood poses a transboundary problem in that some Costa Rican businessmen go to Nicaragua to buy cheap wood and bring it into Costa Rica illegally. Owing to the lack of research on forest species and their exploitation techniques, forest use has been chaotic for nature. Only a few years ago was some attempt made to establish order in the forestry sector, but the task has been arduous for a number of reasons.

In accordance with the current legislation, forestry exploitation requires a forest management plan. Most forestry ventures do have this, despite the numerous requirements. However, the irregularities practiced are difficult to control. Tables 15 and 16 of Annex 3 show the installed capacity actually used in the timber industry in Nicaragua and Costa Rica, respectively, while 17 and 18 set out the annual supply of wood under conditions of sustainable exploitation, by type of forest. Both in Costa Rica and in Nicaragua, there are standards, constitutional mandates, and laws that regulate the exploitation of forestry resources. That notwithstanding, incorrect practices continue to be employed throughout the SJRB, including deforestation and changes in land use. In Costa Rica, deforestation in the basin has diminished due to the scarcity of forests outside the protected areas. By contrast, in the Nicaraguan part of the basin, there are still extensive wooded areas subject to exploitation and degradation. The San Juan River is an excellent medium of transport for logs, hence the latent danger of increased deforestation of the woods on the Nicaraguan side of the basin. Table 19 of Annex 3 shows the types of woods existing in the SJRB.

Inappropriate techniques include the elimination of natural forests (changes in use), inefficient forest use, and ignorance of the potential of the forest. The institutional reality is such that loggers have very little incentives to exploit the forest rationally. At the same time, the lack of economic resources to regulate this activity makes the task a complicated one to solve, with the resulting reduction and degradation of forestry resources. The areas most sensitive to or affected by this problem are Sábalo-Santa Cruz, the upper part of the Tule River and the Camastro River, the inaccessible mountainous areas of the basin. The impact on the water system is considerable, including sedimentation, erosion, and the loss of hydrological potential of the forest. The effects are also clearly transboundary because they occur and are evident in both countries.

The lack of planning and budget for the efficient construction of highways and roads—which are sometimes built on an empirical basis—has negative consequences for the environment and for the population in general. Many of the roads are built on paths, tracks, or animal trails, which are usually unsuitable for vehicular traffic. This makes the environmental impact even worse. A significant amount of the sediment going into the rivers comes from these roads, which are regularly washed by the rain, thereby polluting the rivers. Such informal roadways also lead to disorderly settlement of the basin. This problem is widespread throughout the SJRB, especially in the wetland zones and in the Tortuguero National Park.

Lake Nicaragua is the main body of fresh water in the SJRB and the largest in the Central America Isthmus. It has a surface area of approximately 8,000 Km2, i.e., 21% of the project area. Its mouth at the source of the San Juan River has an average annual flow rate of 475 m³/sec. The second largest body of water in the SJRB is the San Juan River, which has an average flow rate of de 1,308 m³/sec at the mouth of the Sarapiquí River.

Four aquifers have been identified in the Nicaraguan sector of the SJRB, with an overall potential of about 994 MMC a year. The underground water potential in Costa Rican territory is estimated at 994 cubic hectometers. However, sufficient information is not available to determine the extent of the exploitation of this resource. This problem is reflected more in its quality than its quantity, because the resource is being used as a recipient of municipal and industrial wastewater and solid waste, pesticide- and fertilizer-laden sediment, and mainly organic material.

Regarding underground water, the aquifers in the Nicaraguan sector of the basin are probably being overexploited, mainly for irrigation purposes. The most critical aquifers are those of Tipitapa-Malacatoya and Nandaime-Rivas. Care of the aquifers in the area under study is of major importance in maintaining an optimum quality of life and sustainable development in the area under study. Table 22 of Annex 3 shows the main characteristics of the aquifers on the Nicaraguan side of the study area.

Mining and extraction of construction materials is another factor that degrades the habitats in the basin. Although there are currently no major mining projects under way (the few identified sites are still in the exploration stages), there is the possibility that this type of activity could start up in the medium term on a scale that would involve serious damage to the landscape and ecosystems of the SJRB. The necessary precautions should therefore be taken from the project design stage, to prevent environmental damage.

3.1.6Problems related to the political, legal, and institutional framework for the integrated management of the SJRB

Unfortunately, due to the lack of institutional resources (institutional weakness), there is little or no community participation in decision-making relating to the use of environmental resources. Often this is not forthcoming because of the apathy of communities to these things, frequently associated with the lack of education or motivation to solve the most pressing problems, precisely because economic resources are scarce. Perhaps one of the greatest difficulties for integrated basin management is precisely the institutional weakness of the state entities in charge of natural resource management. Underfunded budgets, staff shortages, excessive workloads, etc. are some of the challenges to more effective management these institutions face. One must also mention the lack of coordination between state entities, which do not pool resources with other agencies operating in the same region. This has limited the effectiveness of state action in the region. In some cases, the projects promoted by different agencies overlap, due to false notions of independence and institutional jealousies. In practice, activities in the region are not coordinated. This situation is exacerbated by dissonances in the environmental legal frameworks in both countries, and by the lack of binational institutional arrangements, which pose greater problems for integrated action. Costa Rica has laws like the Forestry Law, Organic Law on the Environment, and the Biodiversity Law, which reveal various intersecting powers and guidelines, with no clear description of the functions of each institution responsible for their application. The same is true of water resources, which actually fall under the purview of the MINAE, though the Water and Sewerage authority as well as the ICE (Costa Rican Electricity Institute) carry out a number of activities without any meaningful consultation on these matters.

The SJRB lacks the strategic institutional vision that would enable a long-term environmental management policy to be implemented to valorize the basin’s water resources. Without this vision, the political decisions within the framework of the basin are inconsistent. As there is no vision for the basin, the services derived from the natural resources existing in the basin, particularly the water resources, are not placed in strategic perspective. This view therefore ultimately includes the services currently provided and not the potential services that it could provide.

There is no active participation of forces operating in the basin, with respect to central decisions related to the basin’s resources, with the result that policies are easily changed as there are no community control mechanisms. In addition to this, the local authorities are often not consulted by the national authorities when major decisions are made. The direct and indirect effects of the weak political, legal, and institutional framework prevailing in SJRB is reflected in the accelerated degradation of ecosystems, actions that endanger protected areas, use natural resources inappropriately and pollute water bodies, causing usage conflicts. The possible solutions to this problem will be geared toward the establishment of official mechanisms for binational technical cooperation; the strengthening of local government associations and municipal border federations; incentives to active and effective participation by civil society; harmonization of the existing environmental laws in both countries, particularly in those that directly impact on the integrated management of water resources.

3.1.7Problems related to economic development

The relationship between income and environmental damage has been repeatedly highlighted but it is not always clear. For example, higher income levels can result from both situations in which environmental damage is great and ones in which the environment is protected. The results are case-specific. In the case of the SJRB, the issue of poverty is very important because it spreads across both countries and has an effect on the manner in which natural resources are used. Two situations therefore arise. On the one hand, there are populations with very low incomes and a predatory approach to resources, resulting in the overexploitation and degradation of the habitat. On the other, there is the need to develop the zone to reduce the incidence of poverty, which can cause more pollution, increased energy consumption, and damage to the environment if measures are not taken to prevent, control, and reduce the environmental impact of such activities. The fundamental problem in economic terms is the existing low income in the basin for various reasons. A number of these causes are presented below.

A large part of the territory of the SJRB is rural and much of the population lives on agriculture. The small producers generally obtain little profitability due to such factors as low production, obsolete technology or lack of it, difficulties in obtaining credit, problems with harvesting and marketing, and low prices for their products. Subsistence agricultural products, such as rice, beans, corn, etc. have the lowest profit margins for output. To improve income levels, some farmers plant these crops on a larger scale or area despite the low profitability levels. Some products, such as coffee, sugar cane, citrus, and pineapple have a higher profit margin, but depend on international prices and high investment for maintenance and farming. Livestock has low area unit profitability, especially in fattening farms. Prospects worsen when technology is outdated and rearing is carried out on a large scale. Deficiencies in the marketing and planning of production result in low profitability due to overproduction and the lack of markets. At the same time, a lack of organization between producers results in unequal prices.

Although there are economic resources available for financing, these are generally not available in suitable forms, which is one of the main concerns of the inhabitants of the SJRB. In light of this lack of resources, options for capital generation are limited. Subsistence farmers receive no kind of credit for their activities. Small farmers exceptionally receive some type of credit for production, but at relatively high interest rates for the sector, with the result that very few are willing to take the risk. Commercial producers who can be classified as medium-sized producers operate with the financing offered to this sector, while agroindustrial producers frequently operate with foreign capital. In Nicaragua, the financial system makes funding available for particular products, but the requirements for granting credit are very strict for small producers and the interest rate, together with the depreciation of the córdoba in relation to the dollar, makes production costs higher than market costs, thereby restricting development of agricultural activity. In Costa Rica, there are a number of entities that provide financing for the agricultural sector. These include cooperatives, the National Bank of Costa Rica, Banco de Costa Rica, Banco Crédito Agrícola de Cartago, Caja Agraria del Instituto de Desarrollo Agrario, Cooperativa de Ahorro y Crédito de Venecia y de San Carlos, etc. The situation in the Costa Rican sector of the basin is such that most farms are engaged in livestock rearing as a traditional and easy alternative in rural areas, given the lack of economic options. This situation occurs on an even larger scale in remote areas, where diversification of production is difficult, sometimes because of the distance and difficulty in accessing markets. Nicaragua faces a similar situation, worsened by the fact that the economy is damaged by a number of political and environmental factors.

In the case of agricultural products, most of the ones produced in the SJRB have little value added, since most of them are subsistence products like rice, corn, beans, root crops, etc. Some export products like bananas, sugar cane, and coffee have some value added due to the industrial processing involved. The lack of initiative on the part of the civilian population and the government and the lack of a market vision are some of the reasons for such situations, compounded by the lack of capital and financing for the development of new economic options.

In the case of forestry, another downstream industry has come out of the primary timber industry, thereby providing some value added for wood. For example, doors, frames, electricity posts, handicraft, and other items are produced. This occurs in both countries, but is more developed in Costa Rica. This sector employs about 5,000 in Nicaragua as opposed to 15,000 in Costa Rica. The SJRB has a number of sizeable population centers located in the municipal or cantonal capitals. But the rest of the basin is made up of small and scattered settlements, with little access to academic training. In this way, a large portion of the rural population barely obtains primary education far less secondary. As a result of the remoteness of education centers, the poor condition of roads, the transportation system, and the economic hardships faced by the population, studies are not viewed as a primary necessity.

The population in general manages business and economic activities empirically, with little or no accounting or business management skills. This prevents their integration into an increasingly competitive economy. There is a very common tendency to analyze problems in isolation and not in a holistic manner. It is in this way that natural resource degradation can be seen as having repercussions on the quality of life of the population and other species. To be effective or accurate about the policies to be followed, it is necessary to be well versed in a number of disciplines in order to have a comprehensive view of the problems and to seek more appropriate solutions for the different sectors. The formation of interdisciplinary commissions is a step toward a comprehensive solution to the problems of a particular area, which would cover most of the components of human development and environmental conservation.

Some population centers are located far away from the rest of the economy in both sectors of the basin. In cantons like Upala and Los Chiles in the Costa Rican sector of the basin, the inhabitants find themselves in a situation where they do not know which consumer goods to produce, because they have little or no comprehensive or business outlook. In these cantons, farmers produce mainly basic grains and root crops, for which profitability is low because their mass production and market prices do not generate wide profit margins. Many farmers have no means of marketing their produce. Middlemen take advantage of this situation, buying the produce at low prices, often causing the farmer to incur a loss or to barely break even. These problems are accentuated due to the lack of regional development programs and strategies, severe weather conditions, accelerated degradation of the soils and ecosystems, exhaustion of forestry products, lack of technical assistance to farmers resulting in the use of inappropriate agricultural practices, and lack of environmental education programs.

Possible solutions include the formation of farmer and producer organizations, seeking outlets for products, establishing regulated quantities of production so as not to cause a glut, seeking other production and financing options for groups of farmers. It would also be necessary to formulate development plans and strategies consonant with the goods and services provided by the ecosystems, leading to the creation of feasible economic alternatives for the population of the SJRB.

3.1.8Problems related to the social area

The various consultants’ reports on the social and economic aspects of the SJRB all portray the region as an area in which most of the population lives in extreme poverty. Poverty is demonstrated and corroborated by the different indices of population growth, health, education, etc., and by the poor condition, lack, or nonexistence of basic services. Furthermore, these populations survive by exerting heavy pressure on natural resources through a predominantly subsistence economy, which is a counterpoint to the extensive agribusiness economy and agroindustrial and industrial processes using polluting technologies in one sector of the basin. This is a region that has been subject to ecological intervention through anthropomorphic action, and is clearly trending toward a worsening of the social and environmental situation, if the efforts and actions currently being undertaken to mitigate the problem are not given sufficient technical and financial backing, and if institutional and organizational capacities are not jointly developed with civil society and local governments, thereby helping to solve the environmental problems in a comprehensive manner. Natural resources are clearly of great value from the social point of view, but few settlers view these resources as a production input having any economic value. In terms of the ecological value of natural resources, it could be pointed out that this valorization is demonstrated by the persons involved in natural resource management at the technical level and by the communities organized around conservation and resource protection projects.

The basin receives a flow of migrants from mainly the western and central zones of Nicaragua. This occurs chiefly as a result of the following developments: the current economic crisis in Nicaragua, the natural phenomena that have occurred in that country, and the development of human settlements in natural reserve areas as a result of the planning processes begun in the early 1990s. Most of this migrant population, in search of subsistence, settles on the fringes of the agricultural areas, developing their own productive patterns brought from their place of origin. Others cross the border into Costa Rica in search of employment opportunities on the big plantations (coffee, banana, sugar cane) and in the services sector. Migration is a constant problem in the SJRB. Labor is a mobile factor, which tends to shift in the event of relative scarcity or uneven distribution of work. In this case the movement is from Nicaragua to Costa Rica. The migratory flow is significant during the sugar cane harvest, the coffee and banana crop seasons, the citrus harvest, and has tended to become permanent and therefore a source of concern to both countries, which are making efforts to control it. In studies on rural poverty in the Costa Rican sector of the basin, cantonal comparisons between 1973 and 1984 show no significant change in the indices for meeting basic needs. The agricultural sector is the hardest hit by poverty.

Twenty five percent of the population gets its water from wells that represents 99% of the scattered, rural population. It is estimated that the condition of the wells of 10% of the population is poor and that 4% of the population uses rain or river water to meet its needs. surface waters have a high degree of pollution from municipal and household used water, the infiltration of sewage water, and contamination from solid and agroindustrial waste. Sixty four percent of the population in the Nicaraguan sector of the basin has a supply of water for human consumption. Ninety three percent de of them figure lives in urban areas and 39% belongs to the rural sector. Sixty one percent of the households have septic tanks, 38% with latrines, and 0.5% lack any type of system for the disposal of excrement. Latrines may pollute the groundwater through fluctuations in the freatic level. The national sewerage network covers only 34% of the territory and only 8 of the 19 existing systems have treatment plants functioning below par.

In the Nicaraguan sector, it was determined that 70% of the population lives in conditions of extreme poverty. Twenty six percent of the infant population between 6 and 9 years old is suffering from stunted growth and child malnutrition in the area is close to 6%. The causes of this phenomenon are different in Costa Rica and Nicaragua, but the common denominator is the lack of education of the population, which makes people used to these sanitary conditions. The lack of resources on the part of the government and the municipalities makes it impossible to address this social problem. Tables 21 and 22 of Annex 3 show the main social indicators in the Costa Rican and Nicaraguan sectors of the basin, respectively.

The population’s lack of environmental education is one of the major causes of the environmental problems of the SJRB, due to the fact that civil society is unaware of many of the goods and services that the ecosystems can offer and of the restrictions on their use. The lack of interest on the part of civil society and the technical and economic limitations of government institutions is aggravating environmental problems, which are becoming increasingly difficult to solve. Unawareness of the negative environmental effects of certain human practices is part of this lack of environmental education. Environmental education in the primary and secondary education programs is needed so that youth will grow up with a concept of rational use of the environment surrounding them. Environmental courses should be introduced for primary and secondary school teachers to enable them to speak and teach about environmental issues. In this regard, the process of construction-structuring of a sustainable culture should promote the valorization of natural resources, particularly water resources, not only as a free, infinite, and renewable resource but also as a social value. This should be affirmed through formal, nonformal, and informal education.

Environmental education for the population contributes to the improvement of the environment itself, based on the observation and analysis of which practices can be beneficial or harmful to the environment. Without education, it is very difficult for individuals to realize that certain activities they carry out are prejudicial to the environment. Both the encroachment of farming and transborder migrations (caused by natural, political, and economic factors) influence population growth in a catalytic and tangible way. By farming new areas, organized or nonorganized groups fight for concessions of land for agricultural or livestock production. In some cases, these persons are marginalized because of the lack of integral development of these new areas.

Nicaraguan migration to Costa Rica has been occurring since the 1970s when the political problems in Nicaragua deepened, causing economic recession, unemployment, and a lack of social guarantees conducive to migration. Other major sources have fed the migratory process from the Nicaraguan sector of the basin, namely the natural disasters occurring in recent years, which have strongly impacted on the region’s economy. This accelerating population growth in the southern sector of the basin has prevented public services from adapting to the situation and places sudden pressure on natural resources. This obviously leads to environmental degradation.

To mitigate these problems, it is necessary to create profitable economic alternatives for producers in the SJRB; to improve the conditions of hygiene and sanitation by building systems to supply drinking water and treat waste water, at both the municipal and industrial levels; to develop programs for the proper management and disposal of solid waste; and to strengthen technical assistance and environmental education programs.

3.2Centers of pollution and sensitive areas

All the environmental problems occur in different spaces in the basin and to different degrees. So far the problems have been analyzed pointing out the key areas in each case from the various environmental angles. This section presents those centers of pollution or sensitive areas identified as priority areas.

3.2.1Urban centers

The urban centers in the SJRB are the location of many of the environmental problems and their sources. It can be asserted that most of these population centers have problems with industrial and household solid waste and wastewater. The towns of Granada, Masaya, Rivas, Nandaime, Juigalpa, San Jorge, El Castillo, and San Carlos in Nicaragua and Ciudad Quesada, Guápiles, and Sarapiquí in Costa Rica are sources of pollution. Even though the levels are not yet seriously high, they are beginning to be problematic. Regular features are solid waste that is not properly treated, inadequate sewerage systems, and industries dumping their effluents in streams, rivers, lakes, and lagoons. The basin’s water resources are seriously affected and their quality could drastically decline in the future if no action is taken to reduce the pollution from these urban centers.

3.2.2Lake Nicaragua

Clearly, Lake Nicaragua is a sensitive and very important area of the basin. It is the largest fresh water reservoir in Central America and has a high potential for navigation, fishing, and tourism. Though pollution has not yet reached critical levels, this is a latent danger considering the population growth and agricultural and industrial activities occurring in the basin. It is very important to know the status of the different ecological systems in this lake, particularly since currently there are more unknown than known variables. The outflow of polluted water from Lake Managua to Lake Nicaragua is an element that has not yet been evaluated but which definitely represents a risk factor for the water quality in the latter region.

3.2.3Caño Negro

The Caño Negro wetlands are internationally recognized for their ability to shelter both migratory and local species of great ecological value and constitute a RAMSAR site. However, they are facing serious threats from sedimentation, the invasion of exotic species, and farming in adjacent areas. The protection of these ecosystems is very important in terms of the waters, and the transborder impact is high. One additional benefit of their conservation in this case is the protection of the habitat for migratory species.

3.2.4San Juan River and its Coastal Zone

The San Juan River, together with Lake Nicaragua, is the central axis of the basin and generates huge economic benefits for both countries. It is not only a source of fishing resources, but is also an excellent communication route. It is currently suffering from overexploitation of many of its commercial species, including sharks, from sedimentation of the riverbed—which has reduced navigation in some areas—and from pollution by fertilizers and pesticides. The increase in tourism-related activities will place some stress on certain areas of this subsystem because of the pollution potential (solid waste, sewage, and spills of fuel and lubricants, in particular), in addition to visitor saturation at sites of marked interest in terms of the scenery, history, or biodiversity.

3.2.5Indio Maíz River Biological Reserve

This reserve constitutes the remnants of a tropical rain forest and is almost untouched. Despite its ecological and environmental importance and its hydrological function in the basin, the area is threatened by the poor infrastructure and lack of technical and economic resources to ensure control and protection of its ecosystems. Its location makes it particularly vulnerable to encroaching farmland and effective protection is difficult because of its large size.

3.2.6Tortuguero Canals

These canals are very important for tourism and communications in the northern sector of the Costa Rican Atlantic coast and suffer from sedimentation of the riverbeds and exploitation and pollution of the water.

ANNEX 1

LOCATION MAP




ANNEX 2
FIGURES








ANNEX 3

TABLES

TABLE 1

THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY


THREAT TO BIODIVERSITY

CONSEQUENCES

Hunting and Fishing

Loss of wildlife: white tailed deer (Odoicoleus virginianus), tapir (Tapirus bairdii), armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) and (Cabassous centralis), white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari), collared peccary (Tayassu tajacu), various species of monkeys like the mantled howler monkey and spider monkey (Alouatta palliata) and (Ateles geoffroyi), the agouti (Dasyprocta punctata) and the paca (Agouti paca); considered to be important cynegetic species. Other species have been hunted for their skins, particular spotted felines like the jaguar (Panthera onca), the margay (Leopardus weidii), the ocelot (Leopardus pardalis), and the oncilla (Leopardus tigrinus), the alligator or caiman and the crocodile (Caiman crocodilus y Crocodilus acutus). Birds like the great tinamou (Tinamus major), several species of duck like the great currasow (Crax rubra) and others are used for food. Fish include the cichlid Cichlasoma dovil and other species, tarpon (Tarpon atlanticus), sea bass (Centropamus spp) and gar (Atractosteus tropicus). Most of these species are in danger of extinction or seriously threatened.

Hunting: Illegal hunting is widespread in the basin, even in the protected areas. Hunting for sport is regulated by the MARENA and MINAE, but without a thorough understanding of population dynamics there can be no sustainable exploitation of the resource. This results in problems for the management of wildlife species and causes the destruction of natural habitats of noncynegetic wildlife species in favor of more usable habitats (burning of pastureland and forests). Subsistence hunting with no prohibitions or periods of protection also occurs.

Fishing: Indiscriminate fishing has caused the shark to disappear from Lake Cocibolca. The worst problem afflicting the maritime zone is also the fishing of shark and other species, and the destruction of reefs.

Logging and deforestation

Destruction and disruption of the natural environment with the felling of mature trees (even if this takes place under management plans). Many species are affected by both the felling of trees and shrubs and by the noise of machinery, the cutting of roads, and by pollution from fuel, waste, and garbage.

Erosion and pollution: Caused by logging which, along with the cutting of roads, provides access for further extraction, with a high risk of water and soil pollution.

Fragmentation of habitats: A high and intensive occurrence in some zones of the basin (Pacific region of Nicaragua and San Carlos plains in Costa Rica). The ability to maintain complete and complex ecosystems is substantially reduced with the reduction in the size of the reserve.

Recurrent burning of pastureland

Generally performed with a view to introducing exotic species of grass (Hyparrhemia rufa, Panicum maximun, and Panicum purpurescens), which, together with various trees, shrubs, and palms resistant to grazing and burning form the typical vegetation of the savannas.

Changes in land use: for the purpose of large scale livestock rearing, thereby causing the disappearance of large expanses of dry and rain forest in the basin.

Soil erosion: causes the exhaustion of nutrients, silting, migration of rural populations to the urban areas, displacement of farmers, and changes in land holding as a result of changes in land use.

Destruction of secondary forests, wooded corridors, or primary forests when blazes flare out of control or escape during the burning of pastureland. This also causes air pollution.

Mining activity

Opencast mining, common in Latin America, involves methods that cause serious pollution, have widespread adverse effects, especially on the aquatic environment, destroying aquatic and land habitats. Mining settlements cause environmental damage and side effects for the health of the population. The extraction of construction materials (stone and sand) has caused the disappearance of aquatic and riparian habitats in the northern zone of CR.

As a result of the heavy environmental stress caused by these works, despite the environmental impact assessments, this activity causes problems of sedimentation, pollution, loss of habitats, and the disappearance of numerous species of fish, mammals, birds, and invertebrates. No plan has been implemented to restore these sites.

Damming or rerouting of groundwater

Modification or rerouting and damming of watercourses for power generation, irrigation, or water supply is an activity that has a strong effect on the ecology of the area. Fish migrations are affected by the damming of rivers, even in areas far away from the dams. This also leads to shifts in human settlements, the construction of roads and highways, and the loss of wide expanses of forest by flooding.

Intensive agricultural production requires irrigation projects which, in many cases, cause erosion problems, with the resulting sedimentation in the dam and loss of useful life. Hydraulic projects for energy production and irrigation have a heavy environmental impact in ecological terms.

Unplanned and makeshift settlements

The growth of urban centers and settlements and the encroachment of farmlands are some of the causes of the isolation and insularity of protected areas. This exerts pressure on the ecosystems and the species they support.

Large settlements of more than 30 families exert intense pressure on the protected areas (unlawful hunting, etc.) and cause water pollution, if there is no control of solid and liquid effluents, with the resulting deterioration or disappearance of aquatic or land ecosystems.

Opening of roads and highways

Road and highway infrastructure in the northern zone of Costa Rica and in the western zone of the Indio-Maíz Biological Reserve in Nicaragua, is laid before areas are opened up for agricultural development. The resulting problems are as follows: the roads are used by logging companies to gain access to new areas for forestry resource use; population growth is caused by the influx of non-farming settlers with the resulting division of the land into plots; and there is a heavy environmental impact caused the mechanical process of road construction, especially on aquatic ecosystems and more specifically on rivers.

Introduction of exotic species

These have a strong impact on the integrity of ecosystems, especially inside and on the periphery of protected areas. The introduction of the water lily (Eichhornia crrassipes) originally from Brazil, is causing clogging problems in the Tortuguero canals, Barra del Colorado, and the canals of the Indio-Maíz reserve. The introduction of the tilapia (Tilapia mossambica) originally from Africa, competes with the native communities of fish in lakes and lagoons.

Pollution from agricultural chemicals, fuels and other products

Crops are cultivated up to the very banks of rivers, causing problems of erosion and pollution. Aerial spraying of agricultural chemicals in Costa Rica causes pesticides and fertilizers to directly impact on water bodies.

Aquatic transport can be a huge pollutant due to spills of fuels and air pollution. Numerous hot spots and more diffuse pollution by fuels and oils in the rivers can be observed.

Erosion and soil loss

Deforestation and inappropriate management of agriculture and livestock—often extended up to the very shores of the rivers—with no planning and control are the main causes of the high level of soil erosion in the basin. This mainly affects the rivers, with the resulting deterioration in the quality of water resources.

Inappropriate agricultural practices

Slash and burn agriculture is a traditional method of preparing the land for cultivation. Rotation is not practiced and there is poor management of the land on slopes, which causes degradation and loss of its agricultural capacity.

Heavy river traffic

Navigation is one of the principal methods of invasion of protected areas. Aquatic routes are used for trafficking in species, for illegal fishing and hunting, for collecting forest species, for transient farming, and unregulated tourism.

Land holding problems

The lack of land ownership results in relocation, mobility of human groups, and transient farming. Such situations are difficult to resolve in both social and economic terms. This is more important in the areas adjacent to protected areas, which become a ready source of meat and firewood consumption, in particular.

Lack of a unified conceptual framework for categories of protected area management

The problems of financing for the conservation of biodiversity have resulted in a system of protected areas that cannot meet the long-term objectives.

The reality of conservation in Costa Rica and Nicaragua, regarding the San Juan River Basin, can be summarized as insufficient to ensure that representative ecosystems in the basin survive intact.

In relation to the management of protected areas, there are many conceptual shortcomings in terms of design, the failure to delimit buffer zones, and low budgets for the development of infrastructure and training, incompatible economic development policies and conservation goals, and inconsistencies in the application of conservation and management concepts and strategies.

Development of adjacent or surrounding areas

There are no plans for regional management and development, hence no guarantee that havens for flora and fauna, ecosystems, or complete regions will be conserved in the absence of an overarching plan.


TABLE 2

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LAKE NICARAGUA


PARAMETERS

UNIT

AVERAGE VALUE

(MARCH 1993)

AVERAGE VALUE

(APRIL 1993)

RANGE

(MAY 1994)

TEMPERATURE

°C

N/A

29.5

28.3 – 30.2

TOTAL COLI

NMP/100 ml

-

-

Min 5.49*106

Max 13.43*106

FECAL COLI

Fc/100 ml

-

-

Min: ab. max::

80

CLOROPHYLL-a

µ g/l

-

-

Average:17.25

TOTAL ALKALINITY

M g/l

84.50

84.50

72.95 – 78.80

BICARBONATES

M g/l

98.28

96.88

81.07 – 91.91

TOTAL HARDNESS

M g/l

73.98

74.24

68.65 – 72.70

BORON

M g/l

0.09

0.10

0.04 – 0.37

CALCIUM

M g/l

17.39

17.36

16.21 – 17.55

CARBONATES

M g/l

2.35

3.72

0.00 – 5.66

CHLORINE

M g/l

17.67

14.67

220 – 227

CONDUCTIVITY

µs/cm

236.00

251.78

15.38 – 49.99

DQO

Mg/l

54.12

24.80

15.38 – 49.9

FLUORIDE

Mg/l

0.24

0.37

0.22 – 0.37

REAC. PHOS. DIS.

µg/l

< 10.0

<=10.0

<5.0

TOT. PHOS. DIS

µg/l

29.0

<=10.0 to 19.0

<5.0 - 7.0

TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS

µg/l

62.0

50.0

<5.0 - 42.0

TOTAL IRON

Mg/l

0.78

0.78

0.08 - 0.54

MAGNESIUM

Mg/l

7.42

7.52

6.77 - 7.36

AMMONIUM

Mg/l

<0.013

0.024

0.05 - 0.24

NITRITES

Mg/l

<0.10

<=0.05- 0.15

<0.05 - 0.05

NITRATES

Mg/l

<0.05

<=0.05 - 0.15

<0.05 - 0.27

DISSOLVED OXYGEN

Mg/l

6.65

6.87

5.20 - 8.80

pH


7.73

7.85

8.10 - 8.47

POTASSIUM

Mg/l

4.23

4.25

3.80 - 4.00

SILICA

Mg/l

17.12

17.55

18.66 - 22.94

SODIUM

Mg/l

21.00

20.22

19.10 - 21.20

TURBIDITY

UNT

196

231.11

4.30 - 11

TOT. SOL. DISSOLVED

Mg/l

182

175.29

161.29 - 189.30

SULFATES

Mg/l

10.39

10.89

8.96 - 10.22


TABLE 3

LEVELS OF PESTICIDES IN THE SEDIMENT ON THE FLOOR OF LAKE NICARAGUA


Pesticide

Maximum admissible conc. in ground-level waters (picogram/l)

Range observed in sediment

Min Max

(picogram/g)

Aldrin

10

-

67.76

Dieldrin

5

66.92

-

Endrin

4

-

66.80

Heptachloride

10

-

84.34

Lindane

20

55.57

181.30

p.p. DDT

2*

-

199.58

p.p DDE

2*

78.92

790.27

*Sum of isomers

Source: Report of the Chromatography section on the sample of pesticides in sediment in the San Juan River. CIRA/UNAN-1994.



TABLE 4

RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF THE WATER IN THE SAN JUAN RIVER SUBSYSTEM


RIVER

pH

COND (µS/CM)

TURB

(UNT)

STD

IRON

P-TOTAL

HARDNESS

LEFT BANK OF THE RIVER

MELCHORA

(9) (10)

8.25

7.99

392.00

284.00

A

160.00

284.47

197.64

0.36

0.73

0.046

0.033

151.45

90.10

BARTOLA

(20) (21)

7.68

8.04

104.00

233.00

A

260.00

78.41

157.46

0.27

1.02

0.027

0.023

37.00

70.05

SABALOS (22) (23)

7.76

7.86

226.00

228.00

110.00

160.00

183.55

164.65

0.49

0.55

0.026

0.031

84.05

71.05

RIGHT BANK OF THE RIVER

EL ZAPOTE* (05)

7.74

103

230

73.59

2.61

0.058

31.65

PAPATURO*

(06)

7.45

183

150

110.72

2.45

0.052

59.40

FRIO* (08)

7.81

154

100

97.11

0.30

0.019

49.50


MEDIO QUESO (11) (12)

7.71

8.07

83

230

76

230

56.57

159.85

1.16

0.20

0.029

0.034

14.40

67.30

POCOSOL (13) (14)

7.65

8.09

128

231

8.7

180

89.06

163.02

0.29

0.81

0.021

0.029

38.65

68.05

SAN CARLOS(15)

(25)

(16)

7.69

7.69

7.92

192

187

227

160

150

220

124.89

119.88

161.63

1.44

2.08

0.81

0.035

0.055

0.032

54.05

54.05

67.05

SARAPIQUI

(17)

(26)

(18)

7.45

7.32

8.01

159

153

209

200

300

180

95.54

90.24

141.45

2.96

3.54

1.14

0.060

0.059

0.35

62.65

48.65

62.65

DELTA (19)

7.63

166

400

117.09

4.46

0.076

52.05



TABLE 5

MAIN CROPS AND AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS USED IN THE PROJECT AREA


Crops

Insecticides

Nematicide

Fungicide

Anti- bacterial/ viral

Herbicide

Molluskicide

Rice

x

x

X


x


Beans

x

x

X

X

x

x

Corn

x

x

X




Roots and Tubers

x

x

X

X

x


Orange

x

x

X

X



Banana

x

x

X


x


Coffee


x

X




Pineapple

x

x

X


x


Sugar Cane

x


X

X



Cotton

x



X



Peanut

x

x

X

X

x


Vegetables

x

x

X

X



Source: Prepared by the Project


TABLE 6

ESTIMATE OF THE POLLUTING POTENTIAL OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS


Parameters

Unit

Nicaragua

Costa Rica

Vol of wastewater

103m3/yr

26.241

4.874

D.B.O.

Ton/yr

8.929

2.526

D.Q.O.

ton/yr

20.164

5.787

Sedimentable solids

ton/yr

12.437

4.788

Fully dissolved solids

ton/yr

11.753

1.520

Nitrogen

ton/yr

1.063

138

Phosphorous

ton/yr

129

17

Source: Prepared by the Project

TABLE 7

THREATS TO BIODIVERSITY AND SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS


Threat to Biodiversity

Specific Recommendations

Hunting and Fishing

Support the conduct of the minimum level of field studies necessary to evaluate the status of populations of the most important cynegetic species, to adjust prohibitions and regulate their exploitation.

Deforestation

Identify, inventory, and try to safeguard all the primary forest remnants in the basin because they represent highly important genetic banks for the future of timber.

In zones where little or no primary forest remains, begin protection by acquiring, through the public or private sector, significant positions in the existing secondary forest, as determined by technical rating.

Incorporate ecological elements and criteria in the logging permit evaluation system, which would prevent logging in fragile areas, such as actual or potential biological corridors.

Promote natural or assisted reforestation using native species, proposing special arrangements and species that reproduce the natural structure of the area before intervention.

Promote alternative uses of private forests to minimize their exclusive use for logging, which is known to have a high environmental cost. Some possible activities identified are the sustainable collection of seeds, scientific research, ecotourism under certain conditions, environmental and other education.

Recurrent Burning of Pastureland

Limit agricultural practices that are destructive or have a heavy negative impact on biodiversity.

Develop the process of environmental education to restrict the use of agricultural practices that are destructive or that seriously affect biodiversity (e.g. burning).

Support the management of public and private institutions that try to stop the persistent conversion of forests.

Mining of metal-bearing substances (gold and sulfur) and construction materials

Support and emphasize the resolution of conflicts of interest (technical and conceptual) in the governmental organizations that regulate these activities.

Damming or rerouting of groundwater

Emphasize in all projects and proposals of this type the inclusion of environmental impact studies by working groups of qualified professionals.

Explore options with fewer adverse effects on biodiversity and alternatives to massive irrigation, when major hydraulic projects are planned. Also examine alternatives to irrigation as a solution to the economic and social development problems of the countries and the San Juan River Basin. Emphasize efficient use of local resources, implementation of appropriate and environmentally sound technologies, and minimize the environmental impact of economic activity, in particular farming.

Discourage the use of water resources from the Indio, Maíz and Tortuguero rivers, whose waters have the quality to maintain the biodiversity of the Grand Biological Reserve of the Indio-Maíz, in Nicaragua and to protect Tortuguero in Costa Rica.

Unplanned and makeshift settlements

Support and strengthen the process of stabilization of agricultural land delimitation in the zone, establishing specific areas for the development of new farming settlements, areas for large-scale farming, industrial zones, and effective buffer areas.

Expedite the solution of problems of transient farming (particularly inside and around the protected areas) by relocating these people to areas with suitable farming potential.

Opening up roads and highways

Minimize or suspend the construction of new highways and roads, particularly those built to gain access to areas for logging. Efforts should also be made to allow the natural or assisted closure by overgrowth of roads and highways that give access to areas that could be recovered.

Establish a solid methodological and environmentally appropriate framework for extracting materials from the beds of rivers and streams.

Draw up a list of rivers and streams where the extraction of construction materials is allowed (requiring permits and imposing regulations to organize the resource base so that it does not impact on all the watercourses and bodies in the basin).

Trafficking in wildlife species

Support and expedite the pertinent research to ascertain the status of populations of the most commercial used species.

Support strengthening and institutional capacity building (technical, human, and financial) of those organizations responsible for the control and management of wildlife.

Introduction of exotic species

Completely prohibit the introduction of exotic species into the natural systems in the basin, including the withdrawal of permits for projects that use exotic species that pose a high risk of invading the natural systems (tilapia farms in zones susceptible to flooding, biological control of pests, etc.).

Support the publication of a directory of exotic species present in the basin, which defines and explains the environmental problems and risks that these species pose or represent for the basin and support the process of educating the population. It is particularly important to inform policy makers and governments of this problem.

Pollution with agricultural chemicals, fuels and other products

Support capacity building (technical, human, and financial) in both private sector and public sector institutions responsible for the control, transportation, and marketing of these products.

Soil erosion and loss

Develop as soon as possible a map of erosion risks in the basin, which identifies the most affected spots.

Develop a plan to control erosion problems and address their causes in the areas identified as critical or highly susceptible.

Commercial navigation

Take inventory of the main river navigation routes in the basin, including fuelling sites. Ensure proper handling of fuels and other toxic substances, and of traffic in fragile spots in the protected areas.

Support the elaboration of a “map of aquatic routes” in the basin, with an accompanying operating manual specifying areas where motorboats should not circulate, fuelling points, prohibited activities (dumping of oil and fuel into the river and other useful information for boat operators, like markers and navigation safety information).

Landholding problems

Identify the main zones in the basin where there are problems with land ownership, such as transient farming, squatting, irregular settlements, etc.

Lack of a unified conceptual framework for categories of management

Support the establishment of a single conceptual framework on categories of management, the main goals and objectives, with a view to solving some of the internal and external conflicts observed in protected areas.

Land development in fragile environments

Effectively protect fragile areas, such as the banks of rivers and streams, wetlands, etc. by means of buffer areas, even on private land.

Promote the development of production activities with a low environmental impact, particularly in zones adjacent to protected areas (inside and outside buffer zones).

Promote and support environmental restoration as a socially desirable activity for the sustainable development of the region.


TABLE 8

SCIENTIFIC NAME, COMMON NAME AND FAMILY OF SOME AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES, MAMMALS, AND BIRDS PRESENT IN THE CRSJ


COMMON NAME

SCIENTIFIC NAME

FAMILY

AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES

Golden toad

Bufo periglenes

Bufonidae

Green iguana

Iguana iguana

Iguanidae

American crocodile

Crocodylus acutus

Crocodylidae

Leatherback sea turtle

Dermochelys coriacea

Chelonidae

Olive Ridely sea turtle

Lepidochelys olivacea

Cheloniidae

Green sea turtle

Chelonia mydas

Cheloniidae

Hawksbill sea turtle

Eretmochelys imbricata

Cheloniidae

Loggerhead sea turtle

Caretta caretta

Cheloniidae

Central American turtle

Kinosternon angustipons

Kinosternidae


MAMMALS

Squirrel monkey

Saimiri oersteedii

Cebidae

Golden spider monkey

Ateles geoffroyi

Cebidae

Jaguar

Panthera onca

Felidae

Ocelot

Leopardus pardalis

Felidae

Margay

Leopardus wiedii

Felidae

Oncilla, Tiger cat

Leopardus tigrinus

Felidae

Puma

Felis concolor

Felidae

Jaguarundi

Herpailurus yaguaroundi

Felidae

Olingo

Bassarincyon gabii y B. Lasius

Procyonidae

Tapir

Tapirus bairdii

Tapiridae

Manatee

Trichechus manatus

Trichechidae

Giant anteater

Mymecophaga tridactyla

Mymecophagidae

Mountain squirrel

Syntheosciurus brochus

Sciuridae


BIRDS

Great green macaw

Ara ambigua

Psittacidae

Scarlet macaw

Ara macao

Psittacidae

Mangrove hummingbird

Amazilia boucardi

Trochiilidae

Motmot

Electron carinatum

Momotidae

Yellow cheek chipe

Dendroica chrysoparia

Parulidae

Yellow-breasted cotinga

Carpodectes antoniae

Cotingidae

Umbrella bird

Cephalopterus glabricollis

Cotingidae

Abbott’s booby

Papasula abbotti

Sulidae

Black petrel

Procellaria parkinsoni

Procellariidae

Galapagos petrel

Pterodroma phaeopygia

Procellariidae

Shearwater

Puffinus xreatopus

Procellriidae

Jabiru

Jabiru mycteria

Ciconidae


TABLE 9

PROTECTED AREAS IN THE BASIN AND THEIR MAIN PERMITTED USES


Level of protection

Category

Costa Rica

Nicaragua

Protection and Research

Biological Reserve

Alberto Brenes (ACG)

Indio-Maíz

Protection, Research, and Recreation

National Park

Guanacaste (ACG)

Rincón de la Vieja (ACG)

Tenorio (ACA)

Miravalles (ACA)

Arenal (ACA)

Juan Castro Blanco

(ACCVC)

Volcán Poás (ACCVC)

Braulio Carrillo (ACCVC)

Volcán Irazú (ACCVC)

Tortuguero (ACT)

Zapatera Archipelago

Masaya Volcano

Protection, Research, Recreation, and Exploitation of Species

Refuge for Wildlife



Refuge for Fauna

Border

Las Camelias

Caño Negro

Bosque Alegre

Border Corridor

Barra del Colorado


Cerro El Jardín

Cordillera Volcánica Central

Curelña, Cureñita

Los Guatusos

San Juan River Delta

Escalante-Chococonte River

Protection, Research, and some extractive activities

Nature reserves


Manares River

Mecatepe Lagoon

Tisma Lagoon

Apoyo Lagoon

Volcán

Mombacho

Sierra de Amerrisque

Mombachito- La Vieja

Fila Masuigüe

Cerro Cumaica

Cerro Alegre

Cordillera Yolaina

Bosque La Esperanza

Bartola


Forest Reserves

Arenal Volcano (ACA)

Cerro El Jardín (ACA)

Cordillera Volcánica Central (ACCVC)

Rubén Torres (ACCVC)

Grecia (ACCVC)

Cureña (ACT) Cureñita

Cerro Silva*


Protective Zone

Arenal-Monteverde

Toro River (AACVC)

La Selva (AACVC)

Tortuguero (ACT)




Mainly Cultural

Historical Site


La Imaculada Fort


Historical Site


Solentiname Archipelago

Unregulated

No Classification

Archie Carr Biological Corridor ( ACT)

Maquenque Lagoon Marshy Wetlands (ACT)

Tamborcito Lacustrine Wetlands (ACT)

Nancital Island Wetlands

El Junquillo Pond

Las Marías Pond

Ñocarime

* Outside the Basin (These areas are used to observe the relationships between the protected areas of the Basin with their surroundings, in addition to demonstrating the need to reinforce the concept of continuity not fragmentation of biological corridors).

TABLE 10

PROTECTED AREAS OF COSTA RICA IN THE SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN


Name

Area in Ha

Decree

Date

Guanacaste National Park

34,764

19124

16 Aug 1989

Rincón de la Vieja National Park

14,083

5398

3 Nov 1973

GUANACASTE CONSERVATION AREA

Guanacaste Protective Zone

National Wildlife Refuge. Border Corridor CR-Nic.


640

13,826


5836-A

25 Feb 1976

1994?

ARENAL CONSERVATION AREA

Las Camelias National Wildlife Reserve

Tenorio National Park

Miravalles National Park

Caño Negro National Wildlife Reserve

Arenal-Monteverde Protective Zone

Arenal Fauna Reserve

Arenal Dam Protective Zone

Arenal National Park

Cerro Jardín Fauna Refuge

RNVS Border Corridor CR-Nic.

Los Guatusos Indigenous Reserve


68

1,712

12,226

10,258

19,487

5,216

9,248

1,904

1,215

25,932

2,743






15120-MAG



1993

1994

1994

20 Jan 1984




1991


1994?


CORDILLERA VOLCANICA CENTRAL CONVERVATION AREA

Juan Castro Blanco National Park

Bosque Alegre Wildlife Reserve

Toro River Protective Zone

Poás Volcano National Park

Cordillera Volcánica Central Fauna Reserve

Braulio Carrillo National Park

La Selva Protective Zone

Turrialba Volcano National Park

Guácimo-Pococí Aquifers Protective Zone

San Ramón Protective Zone

TORTUGUERO PLAINS PROTECTIVE AREA

RNVS Border Corridor CR-Nic.

RNVS Barra del Colorado

Tortuguero Protective Zone (Biological Corridor)

Tortuguero National Park

Archie Carr Biological Corridor

Cureña-Cureñita Fauna Refuge

Maquenque Lagoon Marshy Wetlands

Tamborcito Lacustrine Wetlands


14,258

846

3,702

5,243

51,748

47,646

4,300

872

4525



8,851

92,000

10,407

18,946

82

6,712

538

1,684


18763-MIR


4717

4961-A

8357-A

13459-A


17390-MAG

4960-A




16348-MAG

5680-A







6 Feb 1989



23 Dec 1970

26 Jun 1975

5 Mar 1978

31 Mar 1982


15 Dec 1986



1994?

9 Jun 1985

3 Nov 1975






Source: MIRENEM. National System of Conservation Areas. Wildlife and United Nations General Directorate “List of National Parks” and Protected Areas of the World, Bermúdez and Mena, 1992; Zeledón, 1994. Note: The decrees are surface areas reported are preliminary data.

TABLE 11

PROTECTED AREAS OF NICARAGUA IN THE SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN


Name

Area in Ha

Decree

Date

Indio-Maíz Biological Reserve

295,000

527

17 Apr 1990

Zapatera Archipelago National Park

5,227

1194

5 Feb 1983

Solentiname Archipelago Historical Site

18,930

527

17 Apr 1990

La Inmaculada Fort Historical Site

375

527

17 Apr 1990

Escalante-Chococente River Wildlife Reserve

4,800

1294

11 Aug 1983

Los Guatuzos Wildlife Refuge

43,750

527

17 Apr 1990

Tisma Lagoon Nature Reserve

10,295

1320

8 Sep 1983

Apoyo Lagoon Nature Reserve

3,500

42-91

4 Nov 1991

Mombacho Volcano Nature Reserve

2,487

1320

8 Sep 1983

Mecatepe Lagoon Nature Reserve

1,200

1320

8 Sep1983

Manares River Nature Reserve

1,100

1320

8 Sep 1983

Concepción Volcano Nature Reserve

2,200

1320

8 Sep1983

Maderas Volcano Nature Reserve

4,100

1320

8 Sep 1983

Cerro Cumaica-Cerro Alegre Nature Reserve

5,000

42-91

4 Nov 1991

Cerro Mombachito- La Vieja Nature Reserve

940

42-91

4 Nov 1991

Fila Masigüe Nature Reserve

4,580

42-91

4 Nov 1991

Sierra Amerrisique Nature Reserve

12,073

42-91

4 Nov 1991

Cordillera de Yolaina Nature Reserve

40,000

42-91

4 Nov 1991

San Juan River Delta Wildlife Refuge




Bartola Private Refuge




Source: MARENA (Uncultivated Area Unit)


TABLE 12

SUPPLY OF CUT WOOD IN THE PROJECT AREA


Type of Forest

Available Surface Area (ha)

Available Volume m3*

Primary forest

45,000

45,000

Secondary forest

71,000

35,500

TOTAL

116,000

80,000

*Subject to sustainable use, estimated on the basis of a 20-year cycle and 20m3/ha cc. for primary forests and 10m3/ha cc. for secondary or sparse forests.

Source: MINAE(CR) and PAF(Nic)


TABLE 13

DEMAND FOR ROUND WOOD FOR INDUSTRIAL USE

IN THE NICARAGUAN SEGMENT OF THE BASIN (m3) (Year 1995)


Industry/Product

Production (m3)

Demand for cut wood m3 cc

(%)

Sawnwood

90,000

200,000

80.5

Plywood

20,000

48,300

19.5

TOTAL

110,000

248,300

100.0


TABLE 14

DEMAND FOR ROUND WOOD FOR INDUSTRIAL USE

IN THE COSTA RICAN SEGMENT OF THE BASIN

m3 AVERAGE FOR THE PERIOD 1990-1993


Industry/Product

Production (m3)

Demand for cut wood m3 cc

(%)

Sawnwood

428,100

890,000

86.4

Plywood

48,350

116,800

11.5

Sheets

9,900

18,000

1.8

Matchsticks

1,950

4,500

0.2

Splints

875

2,810

0.1

TOTAL

489,175

1,032,110

100.0

Note: The chipboard factory uses the waste from the sawmill.

Source: Project data from MIRENEM/MINAE.



TABLE 15

INSTALLED CAPACITY ACTUALLY USED

IN THE TIMBER INDUSTRY IN NICARAGUA IN 1994


Type of Industry

Installed Capacity m3

Installed Capacity m3

Idle Capacity (%)

Sawnwood

200,000

121,000

39.5

Plywood

20,000

---

100.0

Source: MARENA/SFN

TABLE 16

INSTALLED CAPACITY AND REAL PRODUCTION

OF THE TIMBER INDUSTRY IN COSTA RICA


Type of Industry

Installed Capacity m3

Installed Capacity m3

Idle Capacity (%)

Sawnwood

890,000

730,000

18.0

Plywood

116,800

67,160

42.5

Sheets

18,000

10,890

39.0

Matchsticks

4,500

3,825

15.0

Splints

2,810

1,531

45.5



TABLE 17

ANNUAL SUPPLY OF TIMBER FROM THE NATURAL FOREST

IN NICARAGUA SUBJECT TO SUSTAINABLE USE


Type of Forest

Available Surface Area (ha)

Available Volume m3*

Primary forest

950,000

950,000

Secondary forest

1,605,000**

802,500

TOTAL

2,555,000

1,752,500

*Subject to sustainable use, estimated on the basis of a 20-year cycle and 20m3/ha cc. for primary forest and 10m3/ha cc. for secondary or sparse forest.

** Includes sparse forests with low yield.

Source: MARENA/SFN



TABLE 18

ANNUAL SUPPLY OF TIMBER FROM NATURAL FORESTS IN

COSTA RICA SUBJECT TO SUSTAINABLE USE


Type of Forest

Available Surface Area (ha)

Available Volume

m3*

Primary forest

433,000

433,000

Secondary forest

370,000

185,000

TOTAL

803,000

618,000

*Subject to sustainable use, estimated on the basis of a 20-year cycle and 20m3/ha cc. for primary forest and 10m3/ha cc. for secondary or sparse forest.

Source: MINAE

TABLE 19

TYPES OF FOREST IN THE PROJECT AREA


Type of Forest

Main Characteristics

Species Represented

Location in the Basin

Dry Tropical Forest

Rains are very seasonal

Rich and fertile soil

Wide diversity of species of trees

Few species of epiphytes and moss

Many deciduous species with synchronized periods of flowering and fruit production


The Rubiaceae family is predominant in the underbrush.

Species of woody lianas and land bromeliads.

Northeast border between CR and Nic.

Eastern and western region of Lake Nicaragua.

Topical Rain Forest

Most extensive type of forest in the basin.

Semi-deciduous, evergreen, tall and multi-layered.


Palms like Scheelea rostratra are common to this type of forest.

On Lake Nicaragua and in the northern zone of CR, near Upala and the Caño Negro lagoons (CR)

Very Humid Tropical Forest

Highest rainfall, up to 6000 mm annually.

Multi-layered evergreens with some deciduous species.

Trees with tall and smooth trunks are common.

Ferns are common, particularly those of the Selaginella species.

Few epiphytic shrubs or strangling trees.

Type of forest in the basin that is richest in species.


Tortuguero plains, Sarapiquí, Indio-Maíz Reserve.

Misty Forest

High rainfall, much of which is passive (from clouds coming into contact with the vegetation).

Short and medium height shrubs

Abundance of ferns, moss, and epiphytes, such as orchids.

Found at the peaks of volcanoes in the volcanic mountain range of Guanacaste, particularly the Orosi, Cacao, Rincón de la Vieja, Miravalles, Tenorio, and Cacho Negro volcanoes.


Secondary Forest

Variable size and floral composition. Occurs by natural or assisted reforestation in areas where the forest has suffered heavy intervention or elimination.

Generally much less diversity than the original forest.

Pioneering species, such as the fruited shoemaker’s tree (Byrsonima crassifolia), trumpet wood (Cecropia spp) and many shrubs.

In a number of spots, like patches of forest.

In the northern zone of CR in areas where most of the trees used for timber have been harvested.

Covers little area in the basin because landowners have little incentive to let the forest grow again.


Corridor Forest

Species tolerant of high humidity.

Ficus spp., balsa wood and other species seeking humid to very humid conditions, which can withstand periodic flooding.



Found along the rivers throughout the basin. Sometimes contain very few trees.

Wetlands

Areas subject to flooding with characteristic vegetation, located on the banks of water bodies.

Many species of aquatic birds, both resident and migratory

Nesting spots for species of fish, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. Generally highly fragile ecological areas.


Mainly to the south and east of Lake Nicaragua, along the San Juan River and at the mouths of its main tributaries, and in the coastal zone of the Indio-Maíz Reserve, the Barra del Colorado Wildlife Refuge, and Tortuguero National Park, Los Guatuzos Wildlife Refuge and Caño Negro.


Mangrove Swamps

Flooded forests bordering the sea.

Contain a high diversity of estuary and marine species. Form very complex ecosystems rich in species.

Various mangrove species, such as red mangrove (Rhyzophora mangle), black mangrove (Avicennia germinans), and white mangrove and Conocarpus erecta.

Ferns, orchids, epiphytes, and bromeliads are common to mangroves.

The mangrove crab (Aratus pisonii) is a characteristic species, especially in places where red mangrove grows.

Restricted to the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the basin, mainly the Atlantic (Indio-Maíz Reserve, Barra del Colorado, and Tortuguero).



TABLE 20

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AQUIFERS

LOCATED IN THE STUDY AREA


SUBSYSTEM

SECTOR

SUB-BASIN

AQUIFER

LOCATION

Area

Km³

PARAMETERS

POTENTIAL

MM/year

USES

MMc/year

AVAILABILITY

Lake Cocibolca

North

Malacatoya and Tecolostote

Tipitapa-Malacatoya

Northern Part of Lake Cocibolca


565

Density: 200 m.

Transmissibility:

1,200 to 1,500 m2/day.

Phreatic levels: Between 1 and 20 m deep.

Specific capacity range registered: 3 m3/h/m.

Storage capacity: 4 * 102 y 26 * 102

144

61

83



Granada, Masaya and Tipitapa

Managua-Granada

Northeastern Part of Lake Cocibolca

1265

Depth: bet. 0 and 250m. Density: 200 m, Transmissibility: bet. 100 m³/day and 3900 m³/day Specific capacity: 2.9 to 338.9 m3/hm. Storage capacity ranges from 6 * 10 to 0.17

495

103

392


WEST

Rivas and Cocibolca

Nandaime-Rivas

Eastern Part of Lake Cocibolca

456 km2

Density: 132m

Depth: bet. 1 and 50m.

Transmissibility: In NE – 2000- 3000 m2/day. In W. -1500-1700 m2/day. In SW - 500m2/day

Specific capacity: 25 - 40 m3/h/m.

205

35

170


EAST

a)Mayales or yate.

b)Tepenagua-sapa-tule.

c) Indio-Maiz

d) San Juan River

East Coast of Lake Cocibolca

Entire coast of the Lake



150












TABLE 21

SOCIAL INDICATORS FOR THE COSTA RICAN SEGMENT OF THE BASIN


Indicators (%)

San Carlos

Guatuso

Upala

Los Chiles

Sarapiqui

La Cruz

Pococí

Average

Illiteracy

10.20

16.00

18.30

19.40

12.80

20.00

10.90

15.37

Birth rate

32.85

43.32

27.20

27.10

18.91

32.09

35.32

31.26

Mortality (general)

3.62

2.86

2.74

2.18

1.45

3.41

3.49

3.33

Infant mortality

12.75

8.61

17.8

22.18

11.00

18.52

10.51

14.48

Neonatal mortality

8.93

11.56

4.01

n.a.

9.32

8.77

9.02

8.60

Unemployment

4.70

5.00

5.70

4.10

4.50

7.70

8.70

5.77

Population density

30.91

12.56

25.00

17.00

12.89

9.92

29.73

19.71

Relative growth

55.50

52.10

43.40

27.20

48.30

63.40

43.00

47.55

Primary sector

56.80

79.90

81.60

81.50

76.60

68.20

64.30

72.70

Rural population

81.27

89.27

93.60

85.05

96.82

79.17

83.94

85.60

Water supply – pipe-borne,* river, rain

83.00

14.10

3.00

63.00

34.00

3.00

56.00

41.10

3.00

44.00

53.40

2.00

48.00

51.00

1.00

70.00

10.10

20.00

77.00

16.30

6.00

71.00

25.00

4.00

Sewerage, septic tanks, latrines,** bush

72.00

28.00

0.30

38.40

61.00

0.40

27.20

73.00

0.20

28.70

68.00

3.00

59.00

41.00

0.00

31.00

67.00

2.00

78.00

22.00

0.10

61.00

38.5

0.5

Housing per capita

4.9

5.3

6.4

8.13.

4.8

5.5

5.4

5.80

Source: Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Costa Rican Water and Sewerage Institute

* 15% are in poor condition

** 19% are in poor condition

TABLE 22

SOCIAL INDICATORS FOR THE NICARAGUAN SEGMENT OF THE BASIN


Indicators

Rivas

Granada

Masaya

Boaco

Chontales

San Juan

%

School enrollment %

Preschool

Primary

Secondary

Technical


20.1

86.7

21.1

n.a.


25.1

87.3

18.9

1.3


28.1

99.6

38.8

0.05


10.85

73.7

16.6

0.2


10.9

61.6

16.4

0.5


16.8

76.0

7.0

0.4


18.2

80.4

25.0

0.7

Health %

Malnutrition

Child health

Hospital beds per capita


27.8

603

n.a.


26.6

470

n.a.


31.8

887

n.a.


31.4

908

n.a.


23.2

687

n.a.


18.1

1.362

n.a.


26.0

710

Sewerage

Urban *

Rural *


41

86


20

64


41

85


53

69


--

77


1

17


31.2

66.3

Pipe-borne water %

Urban

Rural


92

31


(1)103

44


92

59


92

25


75

35


64

15


86.3

34.8

Housing

Housing per capita


5.7


5.8


5.7


5.9


6.3


5.9


5.9

Source: Prepared on the basis of data from SILAIS, MINSA, INIFOM, and INEC

* By system

** Latrines, etc.

(1) Amounts in excess of 100% indicate that the system serves nearby rural populations.

n.a. – no data available.




    1 Hereinafter, the SJRB.

    2 UNEP-OAS, 1997.