Project Proposals on Management of Key Habitats
DEVELOPMENT OF SOUND LAND-USE PRACTICES AND REDUCTION OF SUSPENDED SOLIDS IN ESTUARIES
AND LAGOONS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
1. IDENTIFIERS
Project Number: HAB5
Project Title:
Development of sound land-use practices and Reduction of suspended solids
in estuaries and lagoons in Sub-Saharan Africa
Requesting Country (ies):
The Gambia, Ghana, Mozambique, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa,
Tanzania.
Requesting
National Organization:
Ministry of Coordination of Environmental Affairs (Mozambique)
Ministry of Environment and Sciences and Ministry of Waters and Housing
(Ghana)
Federal Ministry of Environment, Abuja (Nigeria)
Ministry of Environment (Senegal)
Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (Tanzania)
Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, University of Cape Town,
CSIR (South Africa)
Executing Agencies:
Department of Parks and wildlife Management (Gambia)
Office of the National Parks of Senegal (Senegal)
Water Resources Commission, Volta River Authority (Ghana)
UEM (Eduardo Mondlane University UNESCO Chair of Marine Sciences
and Oceanography) (Mozambique)
Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research (NIOMR),
Nigerian Conservation Fund (Nigeria)
Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, University of Cape Town,
CSIR (South Africa)
Department of Forestry and Beekeeping (Tanzania)
Required National
Partners:
Gambia: National Environment Agency (NEA), Local Community members
Department of Community Development (DCD), Action Aid The Gambia,
Department of Forestry, Department of Fisheries
Ghana: Water Resources Commission, Department of Wildlife, Volta River
Authority, Densu Basin Management Board and Ministry of Tourism
Nigeria: Niger/Benue River Basin Authority, Niger Delta Developing
Authority, National Conservation Fust, Nigerian Institute for Oceanography
and Marine Research (NIOMR), Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Federal
Ministry of Water resources, State Ministry of Environment.
Mozambique: DNA (National Directorate of Water), GPZ (Zambezi valley
development authority), UEM (Eduardo Mondlane University)
(Mozambique);
Tanzania: Ministry of Water and Livestock, Rufiji Basin Development
Authority (RUBADA)
South Africa: Academic and Research Institutions
Priority Issue Addressed: Modification of Habitats and Ecotones, Modification of Stream Flow
(Freshwater shortage and excess water), sustainable exploitation of estuarine
and coastal resources, erosion and salt intrusion in the estuaries; protection
of breeding and spawning grounds, maintenance of biological diversity.
Regional Scope:
Southern Africa, East Africa, West Africa
Project Location:
Rufiji River Basin (Tanzania);
Incomati, Zambezi River/delta (Mozambique);
Krynsa Estuary (South Africa);
Western Gambia (Baobolong Wetland Reserve) Delta du Saloum in Senegal
(Gambia);
Niger Delta, Lagos, Elcet, Niger/Benue Catchment (Nigeria);
Korle Lagoon (Ghana);
Delta of the Senegal River (Senegal).
Project Duration:
5 years
Working Group
of the African Process
Management of key habitats.
2. SUMMARY:
According to GPA (1995) natural sedimentation and siltation are important in the development and
maintenance of numerous coastal habitats. Habitats requiring sediment input include coastal wetlands,
lagoons, estuaries and mangroves. Reduction in natural rates of sedimentation can compromise the integrity
of these habitats, as can excessive sediment loads, which may bury benthic communities and threaten
sensitive habitats such as coral reefs, mangroves, seagrass beds, and rocky substrates.
Contaminated sediments, whether they are fresh inputs or dredged, may also lead to pollution, the latter
through resuspension or improper disposal.
Anthropogenic modifications to sediment mobilization and sedimentation are made by, inter alia,
construction activities, forestry operations, agricultural practices, mining practices, hydrological
modifications, dredging activities, and coastal erosion. Effects are generally local in nature, but
transboundary implications may occur in some areas where major river systems form a common border and
where littoral currents carry inputs across international boundaries.
Estuaries and lagoons, fed by rivers, are often prone to siltation due to inflow of suspended sediments.
Suspended solids are often considered pollution because cause deterioration of water quality. In addition,
cause in-filling up of the channels, siltation of the seagrasses and of the corals. These, in turn, have
considerable ecological, social and economic implications. Excessive sediment inflow down the rivers are a
result of accelerated erosion in the river valley due to inadequate land use practices that include bad
agriculture practices and deforestation.
Estuaries and lagoons have considerable ecological, social and economic value, for they are associated with
nursery, breeding and spawning grounds of some key marine and terrestrial species; are sites where harbours
are built, and sites of attraction of tourism development. Hence, these habitats need to be protected.
The present project proposal aims at promoting good land use practices that would reduce erosion along the
river valley, and hence, reduce suspended solids in the estuaries. This would in turn result in prevention of
degradation of coastal and marine environment due to changes in coastal erosion and silation caused by
human activities.
The project will be implemented in specific river valleys (preferably the shared river basins) in sub-Saharan
Africa, and would consist basically in sharing experiences and lessons learned between project
implementation sites.
It is expected that the present proposal would result in an improvement of water quality in the estuaries,
lagoons and bays, in reduction of cost of dredging activities. These would result in the increase in the
availability of resources, in the maintenance of biodiversity and in the efficiency of navigation and harbour
services. The increase in the availability of resources would contribute to the well being of the local
communities and the development of the coastal countries. Thus, this project contributes to the poverty
alleviation and to the promotion of sustainable development - the ultimate goal of the African Process and of
NEPAD.
3. COSTS AND FINANCING (MILLION US $)1
International & bilateral sources:
Required
financing
by
potential
source :
Subtotal
international
financing
:USD
2.100
Co-financing:
Governments
in
cash
&
kind
:
Subtotal
Co-financing
:USD
0.900
Total
Project
Cost:
:USD
3.000
4. GOVERNMENT ENDORSEMENT(S)
Hon. John Kachamila, Minister of Environment of Mozambique
Ministry of Environment and Sciences and Ministry of Waters and Housing (Ghana);
Mrs Fatimata DIA TOURE, Director of the Environment and Classified Establishments (Senegal)
Federal Ministry of Environment (Nigeria)
Minister for Natural Resources and Tourism (Tanzania)
Minister Valli Moosa, Department of Environmental Affairs& Tourism, South Africa
5. GOVERNMENT FOCAL POINT(S)
Mr. Evaristo Baquete, Ministry of Environment of Mozambique
Water Resources Commission and Department of Wildlife (Ghana)
National Environment Agency (NEA), Department of Parks and Wildlife Management (DPWM (The
Gambia)
Mrs Fatimata Dia Toure, Director of the Environment and Classified Establishments (Senegal)
Dr. Larry Awasoka, Director, Nigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research (Nigeria)
Department of Botany and Institute of Marine Sciences (UDSM) (Tanzania)
Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, South Africa
6. AFRICAN PROCESS WORKING GROUP FOCAL POINT(S)
Dr. Antonio Mubango Hoguane (Moz)
Mrs Helena Motta (Moz)
Mr A.K. Armah (Ghana)
1 This budget is preliminary and has not undergone a full consultation process with the respective countries.
Therefore, it does not indicate the actual financial commitment that would be provided by participating
countries once the project proposal and its components are finalised.
1.1.1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.
Background & Justification
The estuaries and lagoons are habitats that serve as nursery grounds of many fish and crustacean species of
high commercial and social value. Further, they are sites associated with other sectors of development such
as harbours, tourism and fisheries. Despite their ecological, social and economic value they are threatened by
siltation.
Channels in estuaries and lagoons are being filled up by sediments, causing considerable damages to the
habitats and ecosystems in the adjoining seas. Some of the impacts of excessive sediment loads include
siltation in the seagrass beds and in corals, both habitats sustain important fisheries resources and endangered
marine species such as Dugongs and marine turtles. In addition, the filling up channels have impacts in the
economy of the countries since the navigation channels that guarantee the access to the harbours have to be
dragged regularly. Further, suspended sediments hamper the penetration of light in the subsurface layers, and
consequently reduction in the primary production.
One of the main causes of excessive sediment loads in estuaries and lagoons is high erosion rate along the
river valley due mainly to artificial excessive flow regime and to deforestation of the river valley. The
deforestation of river valley, in turn, is accelerated by inadequate land use practices (e.g. agriculture
practices, burning forests) and due to deforestation caused by firewood and charcoal demands.
Inappropriate agricultural and forestry land use practices have been identified as a major cause of increased
suspended solid loads to rivers, estuaries and lagoons, but also result in a habitat alteration and distruction,
reduced fisheries, pollution (eutrophication), and modified streamflow.
The Gambia National Report, for instance, identified the Loss of Ecosystems and Ecotones as one of the
major environmental issues in the coastal zone, namely mangroves. At Bintang Bolong "the high load of
sediment and suspended solids transparency of the water has been seriously hampered, and it is expected that
in turn the rate of photosynthesis, and consequently, primary productivity. The shrimp ingests this rotten and
dark suspended debris and organic matter, and this tends to turn its characteristic pink colour to the colour of
the dark surrounding water. The colour thus appears different from the usual pink colour of the Paeneus
notialis. Some reports mistakenly even suggest that shrimps from Bintang Bolong are a different species."
One of the primary causes of the increased suspended solids are "upstream agricultural activities such as
especially rice cultivation and horticultural production takes place within the immediate 300m zone from the
high water mark. Due to population pressure and consequently land scarcity, the tendency for overusing the
available land is becoming increasingly common resulting in many farmers undertaking inappropriate
farming practices. The clearing of vegetation and continuous cultivation (ploughing) of the soil leaves it
exposed to erosion."
The Ghana report has also identified siltation as a major problem in Korle Lagoon, where suspended
particulate matter (SPM), also known as suspended solids, is an indirect measure of siltation. The system
showed a gradient from high levels at the upper reaches to low levels at the outfall near the sea. Values
measured were generally higher during the low tides than at high tides. This indicates clear inflow of
particulate matter from the built up area into the lagoon. SPMs also enter the system from the sea.
The lagoon empties into the sea near Korle Gonno through a rubblemound outfall of width 22 m. This
southern-most section is tidal. Siltation has been a problem and is to a large extent caused by floodwaters,
which erode unpaved areas in the catchment and transport the silt into the lagoon. The lagoon was dredged
between 1961 and 1963. Again in 1976, inadequate attempts were made to deepen the tidal sections. But
since then, its capacity has been seriously reduced by siltation and also by the proliferation of mangrove
plants.
Currently, the Korle Lagoon Ecological Restoration Project (KLERP) is underway. The project consists of
dredging of the lagoon, sanitation control and flood control measures, and upgrading of the lagoon
surroundings. The project is intended to dredge the lagoon to a depth of 4 m with the removal of between
1.25 to 1.5 million m3 of dredged. The sanitation control measures involve construction of interception
drains to collect dry-weather wastewater followed by primary treatment before discharging into the sea. The
flood control component of the project involves widening the lower reaches of the Odaw channel joining the
lagoon and deepening the lagoon to increase the water storage capacity of the lagoon. The upgrading of the
lagoon surroundings by landscaping is intended to encourage human contact with the lagoon as well as
discourage direct pollution through indiscriminate littering.
In Mozambique, expansion of agricultural land and shifting cultivation practices may have contributed to
deforestation, particularly in Incomati and Zambezi rivers. Apart from this, indiscriminate cuts for wood fuel
and building material as well as uncontrolled forest fires contribute to the loss of vegetation cover. Saket
(1994) estimated a rate of 4.27 % over a period between 1972-1990, which means an annual average rate of
0.23 %. Particularly along river basins, deforestation can be a serious problem due to its effects on erosion
and siltation of river channels, lakes and dams.
Apart from excessive suspended solid outflow from the river, the Mozambican report identified also the
depletion of the vegetation cover over the coastal sand dunes as a major problem that stimulates coastal erosion
that in turn contributed to the death of corals and seagrass by siltation.
In South Africa, Siltation has been increasing in certain areas in Knysna Lagoon not so much as a result of
increased sediment input but more as a result of obstructions in the lagoon. As far back as 1952, Day et al.
pointed out that siltation has been accelerated in the upper reaches of the estuary since the completion of the
rail bridge. The Thesen's Island causeway has resulted in the Ashmead channel having been filled in
completely in the vicinity of the causeway and to have become narrower and shallower along much of the
reach north of the island. Similarly, the Leisure Island causeway has resulted in some accumulation of
sediment in the original channel around the island."
In Tanzania Rufiji River Basin (Tanzania); in mangrove areas such as in Mafia Island, and some parts of
Chwaka Bay and Kaole, sediments are sometimes washed away on the seaward side, for reasons not well
understood, and mangroves are swept away by wave action (Semesi, 2001).
The present project proposal aims at reduction of the inflow of suspended solids into the estuaries and
lagoons through promoting improved land use practices in the upper river valley. The issues of the
modification of streamflow will be dealt with in other separate project, HAB2 "Promoting the establishment
of RAMSAR sites and developing participatory and integrated approach for river basin management in Sub-
Saharan Africa".
During the present project proposal research and studies should be conducted in the designated river basin,
estuaries and lagoons for assessment of the current sediment loads, determination of the current land use
practices, and for identification of the suitable land use practices that would result in reduction of sediment
load in the estuaries and lagoons. Good land use practices should promoted among the communities.
At the end of the project, it is expected that:
ˇ Bad land use practices are identified and people are fully aware about their implication in the ecosystems
and in the coastal and marine natural resources
ˇ Good land use practices are identified and people are implementing along the river basins.
ˇ Sediment loads in the estuaries and lagoons should be reduced and hence, water quality in estuaries and
lagoons should be improved.
2.
Objective & Expected Results:
The overall objective of the project is to promote best land use practices in the river valley as to reduce
erosion and suspended solids in the estuaries, lagoons and adjoining seas. The specific objectives are as
follows:
The specific objectives of the project include:
ˇ Evaluation of ecological and socio-economic impacts of suspended solids in estuaries and lagoons;
ˇ Identification and promotion of good land use practices (agricultural and forestry) that reduces erosion in
the river valley;
ˇ Promotion of awareness and environmental education;
This project is to be implemented in pilot demonstration sites in selected river basins and/or lagoons. In the
selection of the sites the following two main criteria will be considered, among others: (a) shared
watercourse (e.g. The Gambia / Senegal initiative), (b) interaction between river system and coastal and
marine ecosystem (e.g. Zambezi, Incomati) and (c) demonstration value.
The expected results are as follows:
(i)
Information on bad and good land use practised along the river to increase or reduce erosion.
(ii) Evaluation of ecological and socio-economic impacts of suspended solids in estuaries and
lagoons;
(iii)
Awareness material/campaigns for designation for prevention of bad land use practices that
accelerate erosion along the river valley.
(iv) Guidelines on good land use practices for reducing erosion in the river valley.
(v) Trained people from the communities on the good land use practices along the river valley.
3.
Project Components/Activities:
The project will consists of basically two main components: (a) identification and raising awareness on the
bad land use practices and (b) identification and promotion of good land use practices.
Component 1. Identification and raising awareness on the land use modalities currently practices in
the river valley with serious problem of siltation
Activity 1.1. Identification and selection of the river basins and wetlands for the implementation of the
project
Activity 1.2. Identification and analysis of the stakeholders to work with.
Activity 1.3. Assessment of the current sediment load in estuaries and lagoons
Activity 1.4. Identification of bad and good land use practices with respect to erosion
Component 2. Identification and promotion of good land use practices for reduction of erosion
Activity 2.1. Through a participatory process and with support from the local communities and stakeholders,
conduct studies for identifying good land use practices for reduction of soil erosion in the river valley.
Activity 2.2. Dissemination of the information on the need to adopt good practices as to reduce sediment
loads in estuaries. This will entail the development of awareness materials, elaboration of manuals and
review documents based on experience carried out in the selected sites and providing guidance to
governments and practitioners.
Activity 2.3. Conduct a series of regional workshops to further facilitate the sharing of information and
experience amongst the stakeholders.
Activity 2.4. Appropriate training courses will be developed and run for enhancing the involvement of the
local stakeholders in the process.
The main activities of this project are summarized in the table below. It calls for a five-year implementation
period. The first year of the project will consist of establishing the facilities for the implementation of the project.
This would include the setting of project co-ordination and implementation structures at local and regional level;
logistic arrangements and selection of the pilot project sites, in consultation with local stakeholders. In the
second year, research and studies for helping to shape the future activities of the project will be conducted. In
addition the participatory and consultative process will be engaged to develop a common strategy to address the
issues of common concern (i.e. reduction of sediment load in estuaries and lagoons).
Main activities and time frame.
Activities
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Genetral
Establishment of the project management structures
Identification and raising awareness on the land use
modalities currently practices in the river valley
Selection of the implementation sites (river basin)
Identification and analysis of the stakeholders
Assessment of the current sediment load in estuaries and
lagoons
Identification of bad and good land use practices with
respect to erosion
Identification and promotion of good land use
practices for reduction of erosion
studies for identifying good land use practices for
reduction of soil erosion in the river valley
Dissemination of the information on the need adopt good
practices as to reduce sediment loads in estuaries.
development of material for raising awareness and
training
Conduct training, workshops and seminars
4.
Linkages to Other National or Regional Activities / Transboundary Aspects
The present proposal, because it is concerned with the conservation of estuaries and lagoons, and hence, of
coastal habitats, can be considered as one of the ways for the implementation of the Nairobi and Abidjan
Conventions. Further, it can be linked to the UN convention on biodiversity, the UN convention on Law of the
Sea, Agenda 21 on sustainable development at the Rio Summit and the Oslo and Paris convention.
There are quite a number of initiatives that could be linked to or contribute to the success of the present project.
Within the programme of intervention, the following are relevant to the present proposal, e.g. control of erosion
and management of river basin and wetlands.
Initiatives outside the programme of intervention of the African process that are linked to the present project
include:
- LOICZ initiative. This could contribute in understanding the interaction between river and coastal habitats.
- GIWA. this could help in the assessment of the impacts of the river and river management in the coastal
ecosystems.
- GPA/LBA Integrated Coastal and River Basin management
- The Korle Lagoon Ecological Restoration Project in Ghana. The project consists of dredging of the
lagoon, sanitation control and flood control measures, and upgrading of the lagoon surroundings
5. Demonstrative
Value
&
Replicability:
The issues of river basin management are often common. In addition, most of the rivers are of transboundary
nature. Hence, the projects of management of river basin are often replicable or transferable. However, the
project may need to be adjusted for the specific conditions of the site for which is to be replicated. With
regard to the wetlands, efforts are being made world-wide for their conservation. Gathering of experiences in
different wetland systems is in course. Experiences form one system, if not literally transferable, could
benefit the others.
6.
Risks and Sustainability
The present proposal is designed on the basis of the availability of adequate finance and necessary logistics.
In the absence of these, the implementation of the project might be difficult.
The present project proposal aims at identification and introduction of new land use practices in the
communities. Often people are reluctant to change in their traditional habits and behaviour. So, major risks
associated with the present project are the difficulty in identification of good practices that would be
accepted by local communities. However, these risks can be mitigated by adequate education and awareness
approaches.
Selection of the project sites can be another difficulty, since the areas are many and often large. To identify
representative areas and communities is going to be difficult. National reports and inputs from country co-
ordinators might be helpfully.
Resources for promoting new land use practices are required, as this would provide demonstration of the
benefits of the practices (both environmental and to the wealth of the local community) and hence, stimulate
the acceptance by the local community.
This project would provide more impact if it is carried out along side with the project of provision of
alternative livelihood.
Establishing the reference base line (data) from where the impacts of the project should be measured from is
almost impossible, because in some rivers there is no systematic record of data. Hence, measurement of the
success of the project would be difficult.
Generally, the level of risk associated with the proposed project is acceptable in the context of the clear need to
support this resource sector in the Sub-Saharan Africa and the stated commitment to this process.
Sustainability of the project will be assured by building local capacity as to continue using the recommended
land use practices. The project puts emphasis on the capacity building both in the provision of basic
infrastructures as well as the human development through desired training. These would no doubt assure
sustainability.
The implementation of this project is based mostly in the local community, local expertise and local
institutions. This should assure ownership and continuity. The development of the present project proposal,
and of the overall project of intervention had involved wide consultation in the countries' institutions and
experts. Local decision-makers, governments and local experts should be involved as much as possible. This
assured ownership and is a step forward towards sustainability. The implementation of the project should be
steered and carried by locals as much as possible.
7.
Stakeholder Participation
This project links with all relevant stakeholders at the village, national and regional level, for it is concerned
with common resources and/or transboundary resources. The main stakeholders include:
- Government, research and higher education institutions.
- NGO's, local communities.
- International organisations such as: LOICZ, IOC, GIWA, GWP, IUCN, WWF-ecoregion
- Government and public sectors such as government departments and river basin authorities
- Development sectors such as: tourism, agricultural and fisheries.
- Private sector
Sound and integrated management of these resources can not be achieved without the involvement of all the
stakeholders. The present project proposals envisage the involvement of all the stakeholders. Appropriate
approaches to involve and assure full participation and mutual benefit of all stakeholders should be adopted.
These would include:
ˇ Involvement of locals in the implementation of the project;
ˇ The creation of consultative committees;
ˇ Public meetings;
ˇ Informal consultations with stakeholders;
ˇ The publication of discussion papers; and
ˇ The use of public media to inform and provide a forum for discussion and promotion of the active
role of local NGOs.
8.
Project Management & Implementation Arrangements
For the implementation of the present project an adequate project management/co-ordination structure
should be established. The structure should have regional and national Coordination Units (CU). The
regional coordination unit would be responsible of co-ordinating and ensuring harmonisation of the
implementation of the project, by providing necessary logistics to the implementing institutions and should
ensure linkages between the implementing institutions in different countries. The national CU (or leading
national institution) would be responsible for national activities, identifying and ensuring the participation of
relevant institutions and organisations in the implementation of the project at the national level, and ensuring
linkages between the implementing institutions and the regional co-ordinating secretariat.
The project is not intended to duplicate the existing institution, but rather, to use much of the existing
facilities. So, the secretariats may be hosted by existing regional and national institutions. Potential national
leading institutions are indicated in paragraph 1. "Executing Agencies", above. Regional secretariat may be
hosted by regional organisation such as UNESCO, UNEP, SADC...
The community must be involved since the planning stage of the activities and in the implementation of the
project at the local level, particularly in the implementation of the management strategies at the local level.
During the research and studies, the community might provide valuable information, particularly regarding
the traditional knowledge, which could complement modern sciences. The involvement of local community
is an assurance of the ownership and of the sustainability of the results of the project.
9.
Project Financing & Duration
The project should last for five years and the total coast of the project should be about USD3,000,000.00
Local institutions are expected to contribute by about 30% and mostly in kind.
The major components of the implementation of the project are as follows:
Project management this might take about 10% of the budget. It refers to the cost of the management of
the project both at the regional and national levels. Includes salaries, overheads, rental of offices and all costs
referring to the day-to-day of the management of the project.
Research and studies estimated at about 25% of the total budget. Refers to surveys needed for identifying
and assessing the impacts of the current land use practices, and both basic and applied studies required to
developing procedures for good land use practices in the river valley.
Awareness material and campaigns About 25% of the budget. Refers to the activities required to raise
awareness among the stakeholders on the need to prevent land use practices that increases erosion and
consequent siltation in estuaries, lagoons and adjoining seas.
Promotion of the good land use practices about 40% of the budget. Refers to the activities required for
conduct education campaigns on the land uses practices that reduces sediment loads in estuaries.
Table 1.
Component & Activity Financing
External Source of Funds
National Government
Total
USDx103
Source 1
Source 2
Source 2
Cash
In-kind
Project management
100,000
200,000
300
Component 1
Identification and raising
awareness on the land use 700,000
300,000
1,000
modalities currently
practices in the river valley
Activity
1.1
identification and selection
of the river basins and
wetlands for the
implementation of the
project
Activity 1.2
identification and analysis
of the stakeholders to work
with
Activity 1.3
assessment of the current
sediment load in estuaries
and lagoons
Activity 1.4
identification of bad and
good land use practices
with respect to erosion
Component 2
Identification and promotion
of good land use practices 1,300,000
400,000
1,700
for reduction of erosion
Activity
2.1
studies for identifying good
land use practices for
reduction of soil erosion in
the river valley
Activity
2.2
Dissemination of the
information on the need
adopt good practices as to
reduce sediment loads in
estuaries.
Activity 2.3
development of material for
raising awareness and
training
Activity 2.4
Conduct training,
workshops and seminars
Total
3,000
Note: This budget is preliminary and has not undergone a full consultation process with the respective
countries. Therefore, it does not indicate the actual financial commitment that would be provided by
participating countries once the project proposal and its components are finalised.
10. Monitoring,
Evaluation
&Dissemination
Project steering committees will be established at the project implementation sites and at the regional level.
The composition of the project steering committees should include representatives of government, target
community, implementation and funding agencies. The steering committees should meet regularly (twice a
year) to analyse progress in the implementation of the activities and plan the future activities with due
adjustments.
Project monitoring and evaluation will be both participatory and continuous with quarterly progress
reporting and reviews. A mid term project review will be conducted with a view to determining the validity
of the initial assumptions, and where necessary re-orient the project as appropriate to reflect the prevailing
situations on the ground.
There should be an internal and external evaluation. The internal evaluation should be conducted by a team
set/approved by the steering committee. The external evaluation should be conducted by a team set/approved
by the funding agencies. During the evaluation, both quantitative and qualitative indicators shall be used in
the process of monitoring and evaluation and will include the following:
ˇ Assessment reports on improvement of the water quality in the river (reduction of sediment loads)
ˇ Number of pilot sites created to demonstrate new land use practices
ˇ Written and oral evaluations of the project's contribution to introduction and assimilation of new land
use practices and reports on the states of the suspended solids down stream the river
ˇ Local Communities evaluations of the benefits derived from the implementation of the project
11. Work Plan and Timetable
Table 2 :
Outline Work Plan and Timetable
Year2
1 2 3 4 5
Quarter
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2
Establish project
management structure
Component 1
Identification of problems
and raising awareness
Activity 1.1
Activity 1.2
Activity 1.3
Activity 1.4
Component 2
Identification and
promotion of good land
use practices
Activity 2.1
Activity 2.2
Activity 2.3
Activity 2.4
ANNEX
Logframe Matrix
Summary Objectively
verifiable
Means of Verification
Critical Assumptions and
indicators
(Monitoring Focus)
Risks
Overall goal of the
intervention
Reduction of siltation in
Estimate of sediment loads
Reports and interviews
Willingness of all the
the river valley, through
in estuaries and lagoons
stakeholders.
promotion of good land
Number of villages
Resources available
use practices in Sub-
applying new land use
Saharan Africa
practices
Objectives of the relevant
National Programs and the
country, regional strategy.
1. Identification of land 1.
Studies and
Reports, interviews
Availability of resources
use practices
interviews to local
(agricultural and communities
forestry) that
accelerates erosion in
the river valley;
2. Evaluation of
2.
Studies and
Availability of resources
ecological and socio-
interviews to local
economic impacts of
communities
suspended solids in
estuaries and lagoons;
3. Identification of good 3.
Studies and
Willingness of all the
land use practices
interviews to local
stakeholders and
(agricultural and communities
availability of resources
forestry) that reduces
erosion in the river
valley;
4. Promotion of
4.
Seminars, meetings
Willingness of all the
awareness and and training courses
stakeholders and
environmental
conducted
availability of resources
education;
5. Promotion of good 5.
Number of sites or
Willingness of all the
land use practices
villages involved and
stakeholders and
(agricultural and number of new
availability of resources
forestry).
practices introduced
Outcomes that lead to the
achievement of the
outlined regional and
national objectives.
Changes due to
intervention (project
impact)
1. Information on bad 1. Studies and interviews
Reports, interviews
Availability of resources
and good land use
to local communities
practised along the
river to increase or
reduce erosion.
2. A list of the river 2. Studies and interviews
Availability of resources
valleys with notorious
to local communities
siltation problems
produced for Sub-
Saharan.
3. Evaluation of
3. Studies and interviews
Willingness of all the
ecological and socio-
to local communities
stakeholders and
economic impacts of
availability of resources
suspended solids in
estuaries and lagoons;
4. Awareness
4. Seminars, meetings
Willingness of all the
material/campaigns
and training courses
stakeholders and
for designation for
conducted
availability of resources
prevention of bad land
use parctices that
accelerates erosion
along the river valley.
5. Guidelines on good 5. Studies and interviews
Willingness of all the
land use practices for
to local communities
stakeholders and
reducing erosion in
availability of resources
the river valley.
6. Trained people from 6. Number of training
Willingness of all the
the communities on
courses conducted and
stakeholders and
the good land use
of people trained
availability of resources
practices along the
river valley.
Results to be delivered by
project which will enable
necessary changes (project
outputs)
1. Survey on the land use 1. Studies and interviews
Reports, interviews
Resources and funds
modalities currently
to local communities
available to carry research
practices in the river
and studies
valley with serious
problem of siltation
2. Education and
2. Seminars, meetings
Reports, interviews
Willingness and co-
awareness on the
and training courses
operation of all the
environmental
conducted
stakeholders needed.
implications of bad
Further, resources and
land use practices and
funds available.
3. Identification and
3. Number of sites or
Interviewing local
Willingness and co-
promotion of good
villages involved and
community. Technical
operation of all the
land use practices for
number of new
reports
stakeholders needed.
reduction of erosion
practices introduced
Further, resources and
funds available.
Components/Activities to
be implemented in order to
obtain planned results
(Project components)
1. Identification and
1. River basin for the Technical reports produced
selection of the river
implementation of the
Resources and funds
basins and wetlands
project selected.
available to carry research
for the
and studies
implementation of the
project
2. Identification and
2. Stakeholders in the Reports
Willingness and co-
analysis of the designated river basins
operation of all the
stakeholders to work
identified.
stakeholders needed.
with.
3. Carrying studies and 3. Studies and interviews
Willingness and co-
interview on the land
conducted
operation of all the
use currently practised
stakeholders needed.
in the selected river
Further, resources and
valleys
funds available.
4. Identification of the
4. Studies and interviews
Resources and funds
land use practices that
conducted
available.
accelerates erosion
5. dissemination of the 5. Guidelines of the good Reports
Willingness and co-
information on the
land use practices
operation of all the
need to adopt good
produced
stakeholders needed.
practices as to reduce
Further, resources and
sediment loads in
funds available.
estuaries.
6. Development of
6. Awareness materials
Willingness and co-
awareness
/campaigns/training
operation of all the
materials/campaigns/tr
courses to promote best
stakeholders needed.
aining and workshop
practices produced.
Further, resources and
and seminars.
funds available.
7. Identification of good 7. Good land use
Willingness and co-
land use practices for
practices identifies
operation of all the
reduction of soil
(Guidelines for best
stakeholders needed.
erosion in the river
land uses produced)
Further, resources and
valley.
funds available.
8. Elaboration of
8. Manuals and review
Resources and funds
manuals and review
documents providing
available.
documents based on
guidance to
experience carried out
governments and
in the selected sites
practitioners produced.
and providing
guidance to
governments and
practitioners.
9. Conduction of a series 9. Number of workshops
Willingness and co-
of regional workshops
conducted
operation of all the
to further facilitate the
stakeholders needed.
sharing of information
Further, resources and
and experience
funds available.
amongst the
stakeholders.
10. Development of
10. Number of training
Willingness and co-
appropriate training
courses conducted
operation of all the
courses for enhancing
stakeholders needed.
the involvement of the
Further, resources and
local stakeholders in
funds available.
the process.