GEF
Regional Working Group Report
FISHERIES
UNDP/GEF Project Entitled "Reducing
Environmental Stress
in the Yellow Sea Large Marine Ecosystem"
Report of Second Meeting
Pusan, ROK, 17~20 November 2005
GEF
About this publication:
This publication contains the report of the Second Meeting of the Regional Working Group
for the Biodiversity Component, under the UNDP/GEF Project, "Reducing Environmental
Stress in the Yellow Sea Large Marine Ecosystem." The report includes a summary of the
discussions and agreements from the Meeting. The meeting reviewed and synthesized
Fisheries data and information for the Yellow Sea acquired during extensive data collection
exercises, analyzing the gaps in the data and discussing the difficulties in data and
information collection. Members discussed the status and patterns-of-change in the Yellow
Sea and agreed upon the preparation of data and information for input to the final
Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA) for the YSLME Project.
For reference purposes, this report may be cited as:
UNDP/GEF 2006. Reducing Environmental Stress in the Yellow Sea Large Marine
Ecosystem, Report of the Second Meeting of the Regional Working Group for the Fisheries
Component (17th-20th November 2005). UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F 2/3.
Cover design:
Ms. YUN Euidea
Photo credits:
Mariculture in the Yellow Sea, Courtesy of Dr. JIN Xianshi from Yellow
Sea Fisheries Research Institute.
REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS
IN THE YELLOW SEA
LARGE MARINE ECOSYSTEM
Report of the Second Meeting of the
Regional Working Group for the Biodiversity Component
UNDP/GEF Yellow Sea Project
Busan, Republic of Korea, 17th to 20th November 2005
GEF
UNDP/GEF PROJECT ENTITLED "REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS IN THE
YELLOW SEA LARGE MARINE ECOSYSTEM"
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Date: 20 November 2005
English only
Second Regional Working Group Meeting
For the Fisheries Component of
The UNDP/GEF Yellow Sea Project
Busan, Korea, 17th to 20th November 2005
Meeting Report
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 1
1.
OPENING OF THE MEETING
1.1 Welcome
addresses
1.1.1 On behalf of the UNDP/GEF Yellow Sea Project, Mr. Jeffrey Archer, Fisheries Officer
for the Project Management Office (PMO), opened the meeting, welcoming all
participants to Busan. He especially welcomed the large number of observers and
briefly introduced the objectives of the meeting.
1.1.2 The Chairperson of the Regional Working Group for Fisheries (RWG-F), Mr. Jin
Xianshi, welcomed all participants to the meeting, and expressed his thanks to PMO
for organising the meeting.
1.2
Introduction of the members
1.2.1 Participants were invited to introduce themselves and each gave a description of
his/her background and involvement in the project. Observers also introduced
themselves, describing their areas of input to the project. The list of participants is
attached to this report as Annex I.
2.
ORGANISATION OF THE MEETING
2.1
Documentation Available to the Meeting
2.1.1 The Chairperson invited the Secretariat to introduce the documents prepared for the
meeting.
2.1.2 Mr. Archer from the PMO introduced the list of documents (Document
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/inf.1) and informed the meeting that the documents in front
of them included the discussion documents:
·
Expected Outcomes and Outputs of the 2nd RWG-F meeting;
·
Activities to be Implemented 2005 to 2006;
·
A Brief Description of the Governance Analysis; and
·
Workplan for the Fisheries Component (2005 to 2006),
and the informational documents:
·
Report of the 1st RWG-F Meeting;
·
Report of the 1st RSTP Meeting; and
·
Report for the Technical Meeting for the Cooperative Study Cruises
(October, 2005) provided as background documents for the
discussion.
2.1.3 The Secretariat made special mention that document UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/6
was missing and document UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/5 was provided in an
incomplete form, as this relied on the full data and information collection reports from
the participating countries, which were not received prior to the meeting, but were
distributed during the meeting.
2.2
Organisation of Work
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 2
2.2.1 The Chairperson invited the Secretariat to introduce this agenda item, referring to
Document UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/inf.3.
2.2.2 The Secretariat introduced document UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/inf.3 describing the
"Provisional Working Programme" for the meeting and noted that the meeting would
be conducted in plenary as best as possible, but suggested that some aspects may
be addressed in sessional working groups where necessary.
3.
ADOPTION OF THE MEETING AGENDA
3.1
The Chairperson briefly explained each agenda item, referring to the Provisional
Agenda (Document UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/1) and Provisional Annotated Agenda
(Document UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/2).
3.2
Participants were asked to consider the agenda prepared by the Secretariat, and to
propose any amendments or additions that they might wish.
3.3
Ms. Connie Chiang mentioned that the UN procedures of contracting would be
explained to the participants, and requested the Chairperson to allow some time
during the meeting to include this short session. The Chairperson suggested to
include this explanation after Agenda Item 6.
3.4
The meeting adopted the agenda with no modification, which is attached as
Annex II to this report.
4.
EXPECTED OUTPUTS FROM THE SECOND RWG-F MEETING
4.1 The Chairperson invited the Secretariat to introduce Document
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/4 and explain the expected outputs from this Meeting.
4.2
Mr. Archer presented the outcomes and outputs anticipated from the meeting, stating
that the main objectives were: the review and synthesis of the data and information of
the fisheries component for the Yellow Sea marine basin acquired during the recent
collection exercise, based on the data/information requirements of this Regional
Working Group, for preparation of the Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis (TDA).
4.3
He reported that the major outcomes of the meeting were expected to be:
· An awareness of the quality, gaps, difficulties and barriers to collecting data and
information on fisheries, fisheries resources and mariculture, and an
understanding of the mechanisms to address these issues.
· An awareness of the region-wide status and patterns-of-change in fisheries
resources and mariculture in the Yellow Sea, with agreements on the current
status and patterns-of-change in benthic and pelagic resources, biodiversity,
biomass, trophic structure, carrying capacity, abundance and distribution,
production levels, etc. of fisheries resources in the Yellow Sea;
· A revised list of `perceived problems' and Causal Chain Analysis agreed at the
First RWG-F meeting.
· An improved state-of-knowledge of the existing national laws and regulations on
fisheries and how these may contribute to potential governance issues.
· An agreement on the preparation of the Fisheries Component inputs for the
preparation of the Draft TDA.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 3
· Understanding of the Fisheries Component's role in the upcoming Cooperative
Surveys of the Yellow Sea Marine Basin.
· Agreement on activities to be implemented during 2005 to 2006 including the
objectives of the body-of-work that is required to be implemented prior to the next
RWG-F meeting, the role of consultants and members of the RWG-F in the
process.
· Agreement on list and schedule of activities for the RWG-F for 2005 to 2006.
4.4
Mr. Archer then informed the group of what tangible outputs were expected from the
meeting. These were:
· A list of activities to address the gaps, data calibration issues and the barriers and
difficulties to collection of data and information, etc.
· A listing of the formats and presentation of data for input to the final TDA
document.
· An updated causal chain analysis based on contemporary fisheries and
mariculture information, finalized for input to the Draft TDA.
· A workplan for the Regional Working Group Fisheries showing activities for
2005 to 2006, to submit for approval to the 2nd PSC Meeting.
· Approved statements of works for each of the impending consultant activities and
proposals for suitable candidates.
· A workplan and list of responsibilities for activities leading up to, during, and after
the co-operative cruise for the Fisheries component.
4.5
The group requested further explanations regarding definitions for "data gaps,"
"consultants," and the "causal chain and governance analysis." The Secretariat
explained that "gaps" referred to missing data, unavailable data, or non-existing data.
"Consultants" referred to qualified persons that would be contracted to implement
activities. The Secretariat also explained that the RWG-I will be responsible for
overseeing the governance analysis for all components, but that each component
should carry out its own causal chain analysis, and provide relevant socio-economic
data and information to the teams that will carry out the governance analysis. More
information about this will be provided later in the meeting.
4.6
Members took note of the expected outputs, and will keep them in mind when
discussing the agenda items.
5.
CONSIDERATION OF THE ON-GOING ACTIVITIES UNDER THE FISHERIES
COMPONENT
5.1
Review of Collected Fisheries Data and Information
5.1.1 The Chairperson invited the National Fisheries Research and Development Institute,
Korea, and Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, China to present the fisheries-
related data and information collected over the past months.
5.1.2 Mr. Sohn Myoung-Ho presented the activity's progress-to-date for Korea's fisheries
national review, explaining the types of data and information that have been collected,
methods used to carry out assignment, current known trends and status of fisheries
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 4
based on available data, and problems with the activity (Document
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F. 2/5).
5.1.3 Mr. Sohn showed the Korean fisheries current status based on data and information
collected covering the period of 1980 to 2004. He stated that 60-70% of the required
data had been collected, but did not present all the data to the group, as the format
for the final presentation should be first agreed with the Chinese members. Instead,
Mr. Sohn suggested the format tables of how data are expected to be shown in the
final product.
5.1.4 Mr. Sohn summarized the data and information to-date by stating that Korean fishing
grounds have expanded since the 1960's, and that Total Catch, which was as its
peak during mid 1980's, has gradually decreased since, showing a continual
downward trend. He also stated that the ratio of total catch from the Yellow Sea is
around 20% in relation to total country catch recently, and although numbers of
fishing vessels and horse power (HP) show an increasing trend, the mean tonnage of
vessels is showing a decreasing trend in recent years. CPUEs (Catch per tonnage,
boats, HP) have been decreased sharply, and he added that the species composition
of the catch has changed a little in the past decade.
5.1.5 Mr. Sohn ended his presentation by stating that there is insufficient data for some
parameters: catch data exact fishing area, detailed CPUE data (Catch per hauls,
fishermen, fishing gears, etc) by fisheries, biological/ecological data, detailed effort
data (number of fishing gears, fishermen, hauls, work days, towing time etc) by
region, by fisheries, and by region and fisheries. Mr. Sohn clarified that region is
defined here as Korean provinces.
5.1.6 Mr. Jin Xianshi presented the activity's progress-to-date for China's national review,
explaining the types of data and information that have been collected, the sources of
data, carrying capacity stock assessment models, socio-economic data, such as
national laws and regulations on fisheries, national laws on management and
conservation measures, and the China-Korea fisheries agreement signed in August
2000.
5.1.7 Mr. Jin explained the gaps in data are: 1) an absence of data covering the entire
Yellow Sea for commercial fisheries and past surveys; 2) no catch data for species
levels in specific areas; and 3) a proportion of Yellow Sea catch data is mixed with
East China Sea catch data.
5.1.8 Finally, the condition of Chinese fisheries was shown, describing the regional and
migratory routes of important species, amount of seasonal catch by species,
dominant stocks, and CPUE.
5.1.9 Mr. Archer enquired if any country had any form of navigational information to identify
discrete locations for spawning and fishing areas.
5.1.10 Both countries stated that they did not possess this information and that spatial
information is defined only by polygons drawn on maps.
5.1.11 Mr. Jin and Ms. Yeon noted that the WWF/KORDI/KEI Yellow Sea Ecoregion
Planning Programme (YSEPP) has fisheries data provided by China and Korea
which is also in the form of polygons, and much of this information can also be
utilised for the purposes of the fisheries component.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 5
5.1.12 The PMO agreed to review the YSEPP GIS data and examine how this may be
used in the analysis of fisheries data and information.
5.1.13 Mr. Archer enquired as to what spatial scales that data and information have been
collected. In the agreed data table, both countries had agreed to collect data and
information at the `province' level, but during discussions, both countries had stated
that they are collecting data for `regions'. Mr. Archer mentioned that the biodiversity
component agreed to collect China's data and information to the level of `city' (which
is a apparently a larger administrative unit than `county'), which was roughly
equivalent in size to the `province' level of Korea. There are approximately 10 `city'
units along the Chinese coastline, whereas there are four provinces along the Korean
coastline.
5.1.14 Both China and Korea confirmed that they have collected data at the province level
and should continue to use this data, even if scale is different.
5.1.15 During further data format discussions, Mr. Jin recommended to the group that Kilo
Watts (KW) power be used as the standard for calculating CPUE as opposed to
gross HP, as the latter was considered to not be an effective a figure to use.
5.1.16 Members agreed to utilise the KW in the calculation of CPUE for each country.
5.1.17 Mr. Jang In-Kwon noted problems in inputting data during the collection activities, in
particular with the lack of knowledge on the format being used by China for their
collection. He recommended that both countries adopt standardised format for
inputting data and information.
5.1.18 Mr. Archer stated that this was in fact, one of the priority items of the meeting to
develop agreements and standardise data and information input in light of the recent
data and information collection activities, beyond that which was agreed on at the
first RWG-F meeting. This was critical and the group should take some time to
ensure that an appropriate format for all data was agreed upon. This issue will be
dealt with at the end of this agenda.
5.1.19 Mr. Archer enquired to members as to whether collected data and information
currently included any details on low value/trash fish levels in catch, that would allow
us to identify the level of catch and use, especially concerning the production of feed
for aquaculture species, as this was a growing global concern as the aquaculture
industry expands.
5.1.20 Members stated that catch records for both countries do not contain details on levels
of low value species or trash fish and this data could not be determined from the data
and information that they had collected, and while members were interested in
obtaining information on low value/trash fish realising the importance of this
information, there is little data available from both Korea and China. Members
suggested that the RWG-Investment should be responsible for analysing this data
and information, and the governance analysis consultants should collect this
information.
5.1.21 Mr. Archer stated that the Food and Agriculture Organisation for the United Nations
(FAO) has detailed information on low value/trash fish for China developed during the
APFIC Regional Workshop on Low Value and "Trash Fish" in the Asia-Pacific in
Vietnam (2005), but does not seem to possess the same quantity or quality of data
for Korea.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 6
5.1.22 The PMO agreed to discuss the issue of low value/trash fish with the
investment group and whether it was possible for the governance analysis
consultants to be able to acquire this kind of fisheries data.
5.1.23 Concomitantly, the PMO would examine the FAO databases to see what
information could be used to fill this data gap.
5.1.24 Mr. Jeung Gab-Yong presented socio-economic data related to fisheries resources in
Korea: number of vessels by fisheries, number of fisherpersons by region, fisheries
income, consumption per capita, export and import, contribution to GDP, TAC, and
national legislation.
5.1.25 The group enquired whether `Consumption per capita' included the consumption of
both fresh and seawater species, and Mr. Jeung confirmed that it did include both.
5.2
Review of Collected Mariculture Data and Information
5.2.1 Mr. Jang presented the method used to carry out this activity, namely visits to
provincial governments, Korea Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, and web
searches, and showed data that had been collected by the Korean team. Mr. Jang
also described the remaining work to be done. He mentioned that reliable data or
information on licenses is not available in the websites and had to visit provincial
governments, and showed samples of data by totals for provinces or cities, but not
for whole country,
5.2.2 Mr. Jang continued to describe total production levels of marine farmed organisms,
aquaculture licenses and area of marine farms (Ha), and aquaculture methods (by
habitat) of marine farmed organisms at the level of province or city.
5.2.3 Mr. Jang described the data and information gaps in the Korean data stating that
mariculture data in Korea, more than 10 years old, is not available and that only
production information from legal farms was included in the data and information. He
stated that there was no way of knowing the exact contribution to production by
illegal mariculture farms but estimated that they may add as much as 20-30% to the
total production figures.
5.2.4 Mr. Fang Jian Guang gave the mariculture data and information collection activity
progress report for China, showing the group data from as early as 1988 2004, and
explaining the current status of mariculture in China, species that are cultured,
culture types, annual yield by city and province, effects of mariculture and
suggestions for addressing problems caused by mariculture which included:
strengthening of investments to improve equipment quality, techniques and
efficiency; resolving problems in culture technologies, water quality control and
purification and resolution of other mariculture-related pollution issues; developing
high level of effectiveness of culture facilities and auto-control techniques.
5.2.5 Mr. Fang went on to describe the gaps in the data and information stating that some
data are available by species, but some by groups, and that is was impossible to get
recent information to determine the change in number of new mariculture licenses
and the change in area of land covered by mariculture because of rapid growth of
mariculture in recent years. He remarked that the licensing of mariculture farms in
China is a recent event, and only data of from the last year are available.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 7
5.1.26 Mr. Archer asked the group whether it was possible to determine the amount of
organisms that are imported or cultured, and then introduced to the natural
environment in order to `enhance' natural stocks, as this was a need and request to
the RWG-F by the RWG-B.
5.1.27 Mr. Jeung stated that enhancement data was not available for Korea.
5.1.28 Mr Fang stated that it is included in China's data, but it is difficult to know the
quantities for each species, or how much is derived from natural vs. cultured
organisms.
5.1.29 Members agreed not to collect any additional data as this is not a core focus
for RWG-F data collection, but agreed that if they can locate the data in the
information that they collected, then they would provide it to RWG-B.
Presentation of Final Data Products
5.2.6 Participants reiterated the need for consistency in expression of species names in
the final reports. Members noted that the scientific names were not a problem.
Members agreed to use common names as listed in FishBase. Additionally,
members agreed to list the local Chinese and Korean names, and one master
list of all species including scientific, English, Chinese and Korean names
would be prepared and included in the final report.
5.2.7 Members held two sessional working groups (for fisheries and for mariculture) to
discuss the format in which to present the final data for the regional synthesis and
TDA.
5.2.8 Mr. Jang presented the agreed data formats that will could used by both countries for
the input of mariculture-specific data. He explained to members that parameters that
either country did not possess would not be included in the spreadsheet.
5.2.9 The agreed data-input tables for use by both countries to standardise the input
of data and information are attached in Annex III.
5.2.10 There was a brief discussion on the spatial scales for collection and presentation of
data and information.
5.2.11 Members agreed that the previous decision to show data to the level of
provinces, except for licenses or number of farms, was still valid after the data
and information exercise.
5.2.12 Members also agreed that total production (marine production only) by
province will be collected and total freshwater production by country will be
added. If total farmed area by province information can be obtained, then this
would also be included.
5.2.13 Ms. Yeon In Ja presented the agreed data input spreadsheet system developed by
the Fisheries group, which provides a format for the input of fisheries-specific data.
5.2.14 Members of the group discussed the requirements for historic data on trawling (Year
of survey, number of stations, bottom trawl coverage, data type) and how to equitably
provide data to obtain a regional picture.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 8
5.2.15 Korea stated that their data was limited and patchy, whilst China claims to possess a
very detailed dataset, with a large temporal coverage.
5.2.16 At the end of discussions, it was agreed that Korea would supply what data
they could and that China would match what Korea provided, and could assist
in the filling-in of any additional gaps in the dataset, if needed.
5.2.17 Members reviewed and modified the format of the data-input spreadsheets, based on
the available data from both countries.
5.2.18 The group agreed on the format of data-input, but the spreadsheet was not
finalised pending more information from Korea and China regarding the trawl
surveys. Korea and China agreed to provide the finalised version to the PMO
by the 25th November, 2005.
5.2.19 The fisheries group also presented an agreed list of species to be used in the data
collection and analyses. This is a list of species nominated from each country as
having a `major' importance to them. This is in contrary to the previous agreement
where 10 species would be selected that represented the `commercially important'
species shared by both countries. The agreed list is attached in Annex IV.
5.2.20 Korea presented the format for socio-economic data. Members discussed,
modified and agreed on the format that is attached as Annex V.
5.2.21 Members then reviewed the original `required data and information' table, agreed at
the 1st RWG-F meeting, and revised the data parameters based on the current data
and information availability. This exercise revealed the current and actual availability
of data and information and highlighted the gaps. The completed table is attached
as Annex VI.
5.2.22 Finally, members reviewed the preliminary causal chain analysis also developed at
the 1st RWG-F meeting and made some modifications. Members deemed that a
more thorough review of the data and information would be provided in the final
reports provided at the end of the data and information collection activity. The
agreed revised causal chain analysis is attached as Annex VII.
6.
CONSIDERATION OF THE CO-OPERATIVE STUDY CRUISES
6.1
The Chairperson invited the Secretariat to present a summary of the Technical
Meeting for the Co-operative Study Cruises, 17-18 October 2005 (Document
UNDP/GEF/YS/JC.1/3).
6.2
Mr. Archer presented the outcomes and agreements of the Technical Meeting,
describing the agreements on cruise dates, survey route, sampling stations and
transect locations, and the personnel allocations made for each working group that
will be onboard during the survey. He also described the discussions and
agreements on transportation of equipment and personnel, the role of scientists and
their responsibilities, the preparation of equipment and the research vessel, sample
and data sharing and follow-up work.
6.3
Mr. Archer noted that the Chief Scientist for China and Chief Scientist for Korea have
both been selected for the cruise, and both have the appropriate authority and
responsibility for the cruise. He also stated that the Captain of the ship was
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 9
ultimately responsible for the safety of the ship and personnel and would make the
relevant decisions during the cruise.
6.4
During the discussions, members noted that there were not enough team members
for the fisheries group, as Dr. Jin would be the Chief Scientist, and would have to
deal with other responsibilities regarding the sampling and overall co-ordination of
the cruise. Thus, the fisheries team is now one person short.
6.5
Mr. Archer stated to the group that since he was participating in the winter cruise, he
will be available to assist all components in their sampling activities. However, as he
will have his own task to perform on behalf of the PMO, he cannot be dedicated to fill
the vacancy of a fisheries scientist.
6.6
The Fisheries group recommended that as the Pollution and Biodiversity groups have
already completed their 2nd RWG meetings and have finalised their team member
numbers, it may be necessary to approach the Ecosystem Component and ask them
to reduce their number of personnel by at least one person, to allow for a
replacement for Mr. Jin to be added to the Fisheries Component.
6.7
The PMO agreed to raise this issue at the upcoming 2nd RWG-E Meeting.
6.8
A question was raised as to whether the northern portion of the spring survey
stations falls within an area that could be an issue for North Korea, and may pose
some difficulties especially for scientists of the South Korea. Mr. Jin noted that the
research vessel has previously had clearance to travel in that area.
6.9
The PMO agreed to confirm the exact status of these northern stations in
relation to the sensitive areas around North Korea, and would defer the issue
to the Project Steering Committee for a decision about future of these
sampling stations if it is an issue.
6.10 A suggestion was made for the Fisheries Component to undertake an otolith study
during the cruise to determine `age composition'. During discussions, this was not
deemed a priority activity, and it was agreed that length data would provide sufficient
information for age composition analysis. However, it was agreed that if any
group required age composition information, they could undertake whatever
study they wanted, so long as the priority goals of the cruise were met, no
extra inconvenience or expense to the vessel or all concerned was created,
and was conducted for the mutual benefit of all involved.
6.11 The group discussed the equipment requirements for the cooperative cruise,
describing the issues and ways to resolve them.
6.12 The group informed the PMO that both countries were not able to locate suitable
electronic balances with the required sensitivity, for use on-board the vessel.
Members agreed to purchase standard electronic balances for in-lab use, and
use manual scales on-board the vessel. Savings made by not purchasing the
more expensive scales would be used to purchase more, cheaper scales to
expedite the measurement of samples.
6.13 Mr. Jin reported that the actual cost of the `Bongo' net systems was about USD 7800,
exceeding the previous estimate given by the RWG-F during the Technical Meeting.
As this was a critical piece of sampling equipment, it would only be possible to
purchase one Bongo net..
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 10
6.14 Mr. Archer voiced his concern about the lack of redundancy and the possibility of
failure or loss of this critical piece of equipment, and therefore the loss of all
associated data.
6.15 Members agreed to purchase only one Bongo net and four horizontal nets.
6.16 Members finalised the workplan, equipment manifest, budget for the Fisheries
Component for the cooperative study cruise. Korea also provided to the PMO, the
final list of samples to be relocated to Korea (for the approval process) at the
completion of the survey. The agreed documents are attached as Annex VIII.
6.17 Members recommended that a technical meeting should be held before the spring
co-operative study cruise. The meeting should be organised some time in late March
2006, perhaps back-to-back with a cross component meeting.
6.18 The PMO agreed to examine the possibility of these dates for these two
meetings.
7.
ACTIVITIES TO BE IMPLEMENTED DURING 2005 TO 2006
7.1
Ms. Chiang briefly introduced the UNOPS contracting procedure for the benefit of the
group, describing the different contract modalities, contract types, the general
contractual processes and procurement system, emphasising the time it takes to
complete the process and the urgency for expedient actions by members of the
working group. Ms Chiang described the contract process for institutes and
individuals and emphasised the significant contract levels, i.e. less than USD 30,000
and greater than USD 30,000, which have significantly different contract procedures
and implications to both contractor and incumbents.
7.2 The Chairperson invited the Secretariat to introduce Document
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/7 and describe the body of work that is required to be
implemented prior to the 3rd RWG-F meeting.
7.3
Mr. Archer summarised the tasks of this agenda item and asked the members to
familiarise themselves with the upcoming activities, the input required by both the
members of the RWG-F and consultants, the schedule of implementation of the work,
and asked the members to propose appropriate candidates to undertake the
consultant tasks. He described the immediate activities of the RWG-F in lieu of the
recent data and information exercise and considering the approaching deadline for
inputs to the TDA. Mr. Archer then described the activities that follow these,
describing the discrete actions for the various sub-components.
7.4
The Chairperson invited members to consider the activities of the RWG-F for 2005 to
2006, make any necessary revisions and propose appropriate candidates for the
required consultant activity.
7.5
After the PMO clarified a few questions from the members, members suggested a
number of potential candidates for consultant contracts, for each of the upcoming
activities.
7.6
The PMO agreed to send the Statement of Work to these candidates soon after
the meeting, and request for bids for the work.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 11
7.7
Mr. Archer presented the process of governance analysis for the Project, describing
the background, the components, and a suggested implementation structure of
governance analysis. He stated that a review of the implementation plan and
discussions with governance experts revealed a need for a consultant(s) to
undertake a full governance analysis integrating the outcomes from each component.
7.8
Mr. Archer also noted that there are some implications to the RWG-F should an
integrated governance analysis be carried out as above, namely, there may be an
additional requirement for the Fisheries Component to provide data and information
for the governance analysis to assist and expedite the activity to meet the deadline.
7.9
Members agreed on the proposed governance analysis presented by the PMO,
and expressed a continuous commitment and willingness to support the PMO
and the consultant(s) in the process of the analysis by providing additional
relevant data if necessary.
7.10 Members recommended that the consultant consider the collection of the following
information, and the RWG-F may be able to provide this information to the consultant
to expedite the governance analysis given the short amount of time before the TDA
should be produced:
· Management related departments (e.g. government structure);
· Fisheries and related laws and regulations and standards, etc.; and
· Current and planned activities (e.g. Fisheries management programmes, etc).
7.11 The PMO agreed to provide this list to the consultant as soon as one is
selected.
8.
WORKPLAN FOR 2005 TO 2006
8.1 The Chairperson invited the Secretariat to introduce Document
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/9, the Fisheries Component workplan.
8.2
Mr. Archer presented the workplan for the Regional Working Group Fisheries,
stating that some changes had been made to reflect the current situation. He invited
members to review and revise the workplan for the RWG-F, for submission and
approval at the 2nd PSC Meeting in December 2005.
8.3
Members revised the workplan for the Fisheries Working Group for 2005 to
2006 that is attached as Annex IX.
9. OTHER
BUSINESS
9.1
The Chairperson invited members to raise any other issues that need to be
considered by this meeting.
9.2
Ms. Chiang commended the members for their progress on the data and information
collection activity, and for almost completing the activity. She also informed
members that for the second round of RWG Meetings, 4 out of 5 Components had to
change their previously agreed dates. This caused some extra work and delay in
implementation of activities. Ms. Chiang asked all members to keep to the agreed
meeting dates, and informed members that last minute changes in RWG
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Page 12
membership and meeting times due to conflicting schedules also created lots of
additional work for the PMO to arrange the meeting and accommodations.
9.3
Mr. Archer mentioned to the group that both regional communication and mutual
understanding were major objectives of this project. He mentioned that the PMO had
established a number of mechanisms to facilitate communication within and between
countries (such as the new e-discussion groups on the YSLME website), and
although he commended the Fisheries Component for their national and regional
communication so far, he urged them to develop this even further, particularly in
regards to communication with Component Chairs, NPCs and the PMO.
9.4
Mr. Archer also gave special thanks to the observers to the meeting, stating that their
input can only increase the level of achievement of the project, and hoped that
observers would continue to be a feature of the RWG-F meetings.
10.
VENUE FOR THE NEXT REGIONAL WORKING GROUP MEETING
10.1 The Chairperson invited members to consider the date and place for the 3rd RWG-F
Meeting.
10.2 Members agreed to have the Third RWG-F Meeting in Weihai, China, from 21-24
August 2006.
11.
ADOPTION OF THE MEETING REPORT
11.1 The Chairperson led the adoption of the draft meeting report prepared by the
Secretariat.
12.
CLOSURE OF THE MEETING
12.1 The Chairperson, Mr. Jin Xianshi gave his thanks to the host, to the participants, and
to the PMO for the efficient management of the meeting.
12.2 Ms. Yeon In Ja of Korea thanked the chair and the PMO for the work hard and
support over the past days, and gave particular thanks to participants and observers.
12.3 On behalf of the PMO, Mr. Jeffrey Archer thanked the Chair for his efficient
moderation of the meeting, the participants for their hard work and contribution, and
the observers for their important input.
12.4 The Chairperson formally closed the meeting at 16:00hrs, 20th November, 2005.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex I
Page 1
Annex I
List of Participants
People's Republic of China
Mr. JIN Xianshi
Mr. FANG Jian Guang
Director, Fishable Resources & Ecosystem
Director, Mariculture Ecology and Carrying
Management Division
Capacity Division
Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute
Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute
106 Nanjing Road
106 Nanjing Road
Qingdao 266071
Qingdao 266071
Tel: 86-532-8584-9430
Tel: 86-532-8582-2957
Fax: 86-532-8581-1514
Fax: 86-532-8581-1514
Email: jin@ysfri.ac.cn
Email: fangjg@ysfri.ac.cn
Mr. WANG Jun
Associate Professor
Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute
106 Nanjing Road
Qingdao 266071
Tel: 86-532-8583-6344
Fax: 86-532-8581-1514
Email: wangjun@ysfri.ac.cn
Republic of Korea
Ms. YEON In Ja
Mr. JANG In Kwon
Senior Scientist
Senior Researcher
West Sea Fisheries Research Institute
West Sea Fisheries Research Institute
National Fisheries Research & Development
National Fisheries Research &
Institute (NFRDI)
Development Institute (NFRDI)
707, Ulwang-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon,
707 Ulwang-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon
400-420, Republic of KOREA
400-420, Republic of KOREA
Tel: 82-32-745-0551
Tel: 82-32-745-0570
Fax: 82-32-745-0549
Fax: 82-32-745-0558
Email: ijyeon@nfrdi.re.kr
Email: jangik@nfrdi.re.kr
Mr. JEUNG Kab Yong
Associate Research Fellow
Korea Maritime Institute
1027-4 Bangbae-3-Dong, Seocho-Gu,
Seoul, Korea 137-852
Tel: 82-2-2105-2745
Fax: 82-2-2105-2859
Email: kyjeung@kmi.re.kr
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex I
Page 2
Observers
Mr. SOHN Myoung Ho
Ms. KIM Hyo Jeong
Junior Scientist
Researcher
West Sea Fisheries Institute
Korea Maritime Institute
National Fisheries Research & Development
1027-4, Bangbae 3-Dong
Institute (NFRDI)
Seochu-Gu,
707 Ulwang-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon
Seoul, 137-851 Republic of KOREA
400-420, Republic of KOREA
Phone: 82-2-486-6244
Tel: 82-32-745-0545
Fax: 82-2-2105-2779
Fax: 82-32-745-0607
E-mail: katehkim@gmail.com
Email: mhsohn@nfrdi.re.kr
Mr. CHO Woo Ik
Mr. IM Yang Jae
FM & Natural Resource Dept.
Junior Scientist
Sundosoft, Inc.
West Sea Fisheries Research Institute
World Meridian Venture Center
National Fisheries Research &
II 15F, 426-5, Gasan-Dong
Development Institute(NFRDI)
Geumcheon-Gu, Seoul
707 Ulwang-dong, Jung-gu, Incheon
Republic of KOREA
400-420, Republic of KOREA
Tel: 82-2-2025-6800
Tel: 82-32-745-0543
Fax: 82-2-2025-6511
Fax: 82-32-745-0549
Email: wicho@sundosoft.com
Email: yjlim@nfrdi.re.kr
Mr. CHOI Seok-Gwan
Distant-water Fisheries Resources
National Fisheries Research
& Development Institute
408-2, Shirang-ri, Gijang-up, Gijang-gun,
Busan
Republic of KOREA
Tel: 82-51-720-2334
Fax: 82-51-720-2337
Email: sgchoi@nfrdi.re.kr
Project Management Office (PMO)
Mr. ARCHER Jeffrey
Ms. CHIANG Connie
Fisheries/Biodiversity Officer
Environment Officer
UNDP/GEF Yellow Sea Project
UNDP/GEF Yellow Sea Project
Korea Ocean Research and Development
Korea Ocean Research and Development
Institute
Institute
1270 Sa-dong Sangnok-gu Ansan-si
1270 Sa-dong Sangnok-gu Ansan-si
Gyeonggi-do 426-744
Gyeonggi-do 426-744
Republic of Korea
Republic of Korea
Tel: (82-31) 400 7832
Tel: (82-31) 400 7833
Fax: (82-31) 400 7826
Fax: (82-31) 400 7826
email: jeff@yslme.org
email: connie@yslme.org
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex I
Page 3
Ms. YUN Euidea
Mr. SONG Kapsung
IT Support Staff
Driver
UNDP/GEF Yellow Sea Project
UNDP/GEF Yellow Sea Project
Korea Ocean Research and Development
Korea Ocean Research and Development
Institute
Institute
1270 Sa-dong Sangnok-gu Ansan-si
1270 Sa-dong Sangnok-gu Ansan-si
Gyeonggi-do 426-744
Gyeonggi-do 426-744
Republic of Korea
Republic of Korea
Tel: (82-31) 400 7830
Tel: (82-31) 400 7794
Fax: (82-31) 400 7826
Fax: (82-31) 400 7826
email: euidea@yslme.org
email: kapsung@yslme.org
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex II
Page 1
Annex II
Agenda
1. OPENING OF THE MEETING
1.1 Welcome
addresses
1.2
Introduction of the members
2. ORGANISATION OF THE MEETING
2.1
Documentation Available to the Meeting
2.2
Organisation of Work
3. ADOPTION OF THE MEETING AGENDA
4. EXPECTED OUTPUTS FROM THE 2ND RWG-F MEETING
5. CONSIDERATION OF THE ON-GOING ACTIVITIES UNDER THE FISHERIES
COMPONENT
5.1
Review of collected Fisheries data and information
5.2
Review of collected Mariculture data and information
6. CONSIDERATION OF THE COOPERATIVE STUDY CRUISE
7. ACTIVITIES TO BE IMPLEMENTED DURING 2005 TO 2006
7.1
Regional Data and Information Synthesis
7.2
Data and Information Input for TDA
7.3
Regional Stock Assessment
7.4 Carrying
Capacity
7.5 Sustainable
Mariculture
7.6
Laws, Regulations and Fisheries Management Plans
8. WORKPLAN FOR 2005 TO 2006
9. OTHER BUSINESS
10. VENUE FOR NEXT REGIONAL WORKING GROUP MEETING
11. ADOPTION OF THE MEETING REPORT
12. CLOSURE OF THE MEETING
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 1
Annex III
Agreed Data Formats
The following are the agreed tables describing the format for data-entry for the Fisheries
Component covering fisheries production, mariculture production and socio-economics.
Sample data has been provided in some cases as a guide only.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 2
Table X. Total Catch by Commercially Important Species
Small
Spanish
Chub
Largehead
Pacific
Fleshy
Year
yellow
Anchovy
Sandlance Acetes
Squids
Total
Mackerel
Mackerel
hairtail
herring
prawn
croaker
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Mean
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 3
Table X. Tonnage and
KW of Boats
Non-powered
Powered Vessel
Total
Vessel
Year
Tons/Vessel
Tons/vessel
No. Tons KW
No. Tons
No. Tons
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Mean
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 4
Table X. Commercially Important Species
Composition of Total Catch
Small
Spanish
Chub
Largehead
Pacific
Fleshy
Year
yellow
Anchovy
Sandlance Acetes
Squids Total
Mackerel
Mackerel
hairtail
herring
prawn
croaker
1986
1987
1988
1989
%
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
ETC
2004
Mean
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 5
Table X. Growth Parameters by
Species
Species Growh
Pattern
Common
Scientific
L
Remarks
Longevity
k t
Name
Name
(cm)
0 W=aLb
(yr)
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 6
Table X. Reproduction and Spawning Characteristics by Species
Species Reproduction
Min length at
Fecundity
Optimum
Remarks
Common Name
Scientific Name
maturity
Season
(× 10,000)
temp. ()
(cm)
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 7
Table X. Seasonal Species Composition by Bottom Trawl Survey
Year
Rank
Spring Winter Total
Species
Catch(g)
Ratio(W,%) Species Catch(g) Ratio(W,%) Species Catch(g) Ratio(W,%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Year
Rank
Spring Winter Total
Species
Catch(g)
Ratio(W,%) Species Catch(g) Ratio(W,%) Species Catch(g) Ratio(W,%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2005
Rank
Spring Winter Total
Species
Catch(g)
Ratio(W,%) Species Catch(g) Ratio(W,%) Species Catch(g) Ratio(W,%)
1
2
3
4
ETC
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 8
Table X. Seasonal Density Distribution of Species by Bottom Trawl
Survey
Year
Major Species
Spring Winter Total
Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Year
Major Species
Spring Winter Total
Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2005
Major Species
Spring Winter Total
Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range
1
2
3
ETC
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 9
Table X. Seasonal Number of Fish Larvae and eggs by Ichthyoplankton
survey
Year
Spring Winter
Major Species
Larvae Eggs Larvae Eggs
Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Year
Spring Winter
Major Species
Larvae Eggs Larvae Eggs
Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2005
Spring Winter
Major Species
Larvae Eggs Larvae Eggs
Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range Mean Range
1
2
3
4
5
6
ETC
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 10
Table X. Total production of marine farmed organisms in X Year
(unit: M/T)
Province
Kind
species
TOTAL
Incheon
Gyeonggi
Chungnam
Jeonbuk
Jeonnam
Paralichthys
2,243.5
olivaceus
65
8
2,316.5
Lateolabrax latus
28
7
91.3
126.3
Epinephelus
septemfasciatus
-
2.0
2.0
Acanthopagrus
191
schlegelii
-
31.3
222.3
Oplegnathus
343
fasciatus
-
-
343.0
Pagrus major
-
29.3
29.3
Other sea breams
-
73.0
73.0
Miichthys miiuy
-
-
-
Sciaenops ocellatus
-
-
-
Finfish
Seriola quinqueradiata
-
0.3
0.3
Puffers
3
2.3
5.3
Sebastes schlegeli
2,094
1,657.8
54
7
3,812.8
Other rock fishes
-
3.0
3.0
Muguil spp.
483
26
106
271
83.8
969.8
Pleurogrammus
azonus
-
-
Konosirus punctatus
5
104
18.0
127.0
Stephanolepis sp.;
16
Thamnaconus sp.
-
16.0
Other finfishes
3
-
3.0
subtotal
3,158
4,235.3
99
160
397
8,049.3
Fenneropenaeus
637
chinensis
36
26
81
399.0
1,179.0
Crustacea
Penaeus japonicus
-
-
ns
subtotal
637
36
26
81
399.0
1,179.0
Shellfish Crassostrea gigas
9,933
12,542.8
1,004
23,479.8
Rapana venosa
-
-
Haliotis discus hannai
-
306.5
306.5
Chlamys farreri
nipponensis
0.3
0.3
Cyclina sinensis
79
-
-
79.0
Mactra chinensis
-
-
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 11
Scapharca
2,695.3
subcrenata
-
2,695.3
Solen spp.
-
-
-
Ruditapes
14,889
philippinarum
29
10,096
204.0
25,218.0
Meretrix lusoria
-
-
-
Atrina pectinata
499.3
499.3
Scapharca
broughtonii
-
-
Mactra veneriformis
-
Mytilus coruscus
813.0
813.0
Other shellfish
-
-
-
subtotal
24,901
17,061.0
1,033
-
10,096
53,091.0
Porphyra spp.
14,684
45,744.0
344
3,688
15,731
80,191.0
Laminaria japonica
5,293.3 5,293.3
Undaria pinnatifida
335
54,351.5 54,686.5
Gelidium amansii
-
-
Gigartina spp.
-
-
Seaweeds Codium fragile
9.5
9.5
Hijika fusiforme
5,702.8 5,702.8
Enteromorpha spp.
12.5
12.5
Other seaweed
-
-
subtotal
15,019
111,113.5 145,895.
344
3,688
15,731
5
Synthina roretzi
-
-
Others
Stichop
us japonicus
-
-
-
subtotal
-
-
-
-
-
total(mt)
43,715
132,808.8 208,214.
1,512
3,874
26,305
8
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 12
Table X. Change in total production of marine farmed organisms from X Year to X Year
(unit:M/T)
year
Kind
species
TOTAL
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Flounder(Paralichthys
Finfish olivaceus)
380
827
2,674
1,829
1,525.5 867
1,616
2,011
2,469
2,316.5
16,514.8
Sea Bass(Lateolabrax latus)
42
10
15
39
22.5
35
74
194
191
126.3
747.5
Sevenband
grouper(Epinephelus
0
2
1
-
1.0
0
3
8
1
2.0
17.8
septemfasciatus)
Black Sea
Bream(Acanthopagrus
2
1
10
37
65.8
78
131
392
348
222.3
1,286.0
schlegelii)
Parrot fish(Oplegnathus
fasciatus)
2
1
9
19
106.0
87
13
60
400
343.0
1,040.0
Red sea bream(Pagrus
major)
0
-
5
3
17.0
16
28
26
27
29.3
151.3
Other sea breams
1
-
-
10
8.0
14
3
5
15
73.0
127.5
Brown croaker(Miichthys
miiuy)
-
-
-
-
0.8
12
4
1
-
-
17.8
Red drum(Sciaenops
ocellatus)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yellowtail(Seriola
quinqueradiata)
3
0
1
0
0.5
6
3
7
-
0.3
20.5
Puffers
-
-
-
-
3.8
-
-
1
1
5.3
10.5
Korean rock fish(Sebastes
schlegeli)
112
381
1,765
2,337
1,600.3 1,036
1,302
2,351
4,246
3,812.8
18,941.3
Other rock fishes
136
11
2
8
148.5
22
12
3
27
3.0
371.8
Mullets(Muguil spp.)
26
14
51
53
72.3
270
125
835
1,037
969.8
3,450.8
Okhostk Atka
mackerel(Pleurogrammus
14
19
2
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
35.8
azonus)
Dotted Gizzard
shad(Konosirus punctatus)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
127.0
127.0
File fishes (Stephanolepis
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 13
sp.; Thamnaconus sp.)
-
-
-
-
0.8
2
1
-
-
16.0
19.3
Other finfish
-
-
3
3
-
-
6
32
6
3.0
53.3
subtotal
718
1,266
4,536
4,337
3,572.5
2,442
3,321
5,925
8,766
8,049.3
42,932.5
Fenneropenaeus chinensis
353
339
1,479
737
915.5
853
1,209
1,150
1,084
1,179.0
9,297.9
Crustace
Penaeus japonicus
25
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
26.6
ans
subtotal
378
340
1,479
737
915.5
853
1,209
1,150
1,084
1,179.0
9,324.5
Crassostrea gigas
13,652
148,766.3
17,252
13,709
10,525
8,801
12,197.0 12,136
10,616
26,398
23,479.8
Rapana venosa
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
Haliotis discus hannai
54
25
6
0
-
3
5
15
259
306.5
672.3
Chlamys farreri nipponensis
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.3
0.3
Cyclina sinensis
16
7
-
33
3.0
46
25
219
189
79.0
617.0
Mactra chinensis
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
Scapharca subcrenata
2,923
742
385
1,086
362.5
166
933
94
553
2,695.3
9,937.3
Solen spp.
Shellfish
1,792
1,711
1,645
27
-
1
-
-
1
-
5,175.8
Ruditapes philippinarum
136,439.3
7,330
8,755
8,443
12,434
11,504.5
12,939
14,653
9,703
25,462
25,218.0
Meretrix lusoria
39
17
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
-
58.0
Atrina pectinata
-
-
-
48
276.0
500
309
144
196
499.3
1,971.3
Scapharca broughtonii
93
65
15
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
174.0
Mactra veneriformis
476
178
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
654.0
Mytilus coruscus
7,302
9,840
8,853
1,438
1,886.8
1,200
1,866
1,676
901
813.0
35,776.8
Other shellfish
4
-
-
-
2.5
4
-
-
-
-
10.0
subtotal
25,504
340,255.8
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 14
37,281
35,048
29,872
23,867
26,232.3 26,995
28,409
53,959
53,091.0
Porphyra spp.
70,112
634,149.0
67,758
55,068
47,582
70,565
71,011.3 46,095
58,050
67,718
80,191.0
Laminaria japonica
5,734
8,066
7,762
1,645
5,315.5
3,323
3,677
5,220
5,989
5,293.3
52,023.0
Undaria pinnatifida
50,882
603,514.5
93,658
73,614
105,899
53,739
45,987.5 45,408
37,105
42,537
54,686.5
Gelidium amansii
-
-
-
-
4.0
-
-
1
-
-
5.0
Gigartina spp.
-
-
-
-
0.5
-
-
-
-
-
0.5
Seawee
Codium fragile
ds
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
-
9.5
27.5
Hijika fusiforme
9,420
5,764
8,618
6,245
5,665.8
2,912
1,716
2,751
8,412
5,702.8
57,206.0
Enteromorpha spp.
817
628
882
1,054
1,201.5
1,051
1,200
2,113
116
12.5
9,075.3
Other seaweed
-
1
-
488
48.3
68
0
43
-
-
648.5
subtotal
129,234.
131,140
145,895.
1,356,649.3
177,387
143,141
170,742
133,736
98,856
101,747
124,772
3
5
Synthina roretzi
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Others Stichopus japonicus
-
-
-
5
2.0
1
-
-
-
-
8.0
subtotal
-
-
-
5
2.0
1
-
-
-
-
8.0
total
159,956.
129,147
163,718
208,214.
1,749,170.1
215,764
179,794
206,629
162,682
134,685
188,581
6
8
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 15
Table X. Change in total production of major marine farmed species from XXXX Year to XXXX Year
(unit: M/T)
year
Kind
species
TOTAL
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Flounder(Paralicht
380 827
2,674
1,829
1,525.5 867
1,616
2,011
2,469
2,316.5
16,514.8
hys olivaceus)
Korean rock
fish(Sebastes
112 381
1,765
2,337
1,600.3 1,036
1,302
2,351
4,246
3,812.8
Finfish
18,941.3
schlegelii)
other finfish
226 58
98
171
446.8
540
403
1,563
2,052
1,920.0
7,476.5
subtotal
718 1,266
4,536
4,337
3,572.5
2,442
3,321
5,925
8,766
8,049.3
42,932.5
Fenneropenaeus
353 339
1,479
737
915.5
853
1,209
1,150
1,084
1,179.0
chinensis
9,297.9
Penaeus
Crustaceans
25 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
japonicus
-
-
26.6
subtotal
378 340
1,479
737
915.5
853
1,209
1,150
1,084
1,179.0
9,324.5
Crassostrea gigas 17,252
13,709
10,525
8,801
12,197.0 12,136
10,616
13,652
26,398
23,479.8
148,766.3
Ruditapes
7,330 8,755
8,443
12,434
11,504.5
12,939
14,653
9,703
25,462
25,218.0
136,439.3
philippinarum
Shellfish
12,699
12,584
10,904
2,632
2,530.8
1,918
3,139
2,149
2,099
4,393.3
other shellfish
55,046.6
subtotal
37,281
35,048
29,872
23,867
26,232.3
26,995
28,409
25,504
53,959
53,091.0
340,255.8
Porphyra spp.
67,758
55,068
47,582
70,565
71,011.3
46,095
58,050
70,112
67,718
80,191.0
634,149.0
Undaria
93,658
73,614
105,899
53,739
45,987.5
45,408
37,105
50,882
42,537
54,686.5
603,514.5
pinnatifida
Seaweeds
other seaweed
15,971
14,459
17,262
9,432
12,235.5
7,354
6,593
10,146
14,517
11,018.0
118,985.8
subtotal
177,387
143,141
170,742
133,736
129,234.3
98,856
101,747
131,140
124,772
145,895.5
1,356,649.3
total
215,764
179,794
206,629
162,682
159,956.6
129,147
134,685
163,718
188,581
208,214.8
1,749,170.1
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 16
Table X. Overview of marine farmed production for last 10 years (unit: M/T)
Year
Kind
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
total
Finfish
718 1265.5 4536.3 4337 3572.5 2442.3 3320.5 5925
8766.3
8049.3
42932.7
Crustacean
378.1 340.1 1479 737.3 915.5 853
1208.5 1150 1084 1179 9324.5
Shellfish
37281.1 35047.6 29872 23866.8 26232.3 26994.5 28408.5 25503.6 53958.6 53091 340256
Seaweed
177387 143141 170742 133736 129234 98856 101747 131140 124772 145896 1356650
Others
0 0 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 8
Total
215764
179794 206629
162682
159957
129147
134685
163718
188581 208215 1749171
Table X. Production ratio of marine farmed organisms(kinds) for last 10 years
Year
Kind
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
total
Finfish(%)
0.3 0.7 2.2 2.7 2.2 1.9
2.5 3.6 4.6 3.9 2.5
Crustacean(%)
0.2 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.7
0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5
Shellfish(%)
17.3 19.5 14.5 14.7 16.4 20.9
21.1 15.6 28.6 25.5 19.5
Seaweed(%)
82.2 79.6 82.6 82.2 80.8 76.5
75.5 80.1 66.2 70.1 77.6
Total(%)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Total(mt)
215764 179794 206629 162682 159957 129147 134685 163718 188581 208215
1749171
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 17
Total farmed production in 2004 (unit:mt)
Province
Kind
TOTAL
Incheon
Gyeonggi Chungnam Jeonbuk Jeonnam
Finfish 99
3,158 397
160
4,235.3
8,049.3
Shrimp 36
26 637 81 399.0
1,179.0
Shellfish 1,033
- 24,901 10,096 17,061.0 53,091.0
344
15,019 15,731
Seaweed
3,688
111,113.5 145,895.5
43,715 26,305
total(mt) 1,512
3,874
132,808.8 208,214.8
Table X. Aquaculture Licenses and Area of Marine Farmed Species for XXXX Year
(No, number of licenses; ha, farmed area)
ha
ha
ha
ha
ha
ha
Finfish
Crustaceans
Shellfish
Seaweed
Polyculture
Collective farms
Total
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 18
Table X. Aquaculture licenses and area of marine farmed species for last 10 years
(No, number of licenses; ha, farmed area)
year
Kind
species
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
No
ha
No
ha
No
ha
No
ha
No
ha
No
ha
No
ha
No
ha
No
ha
No
ha
Paralichthys olivaceus
0.0
0.0
Lateolabrax lutus
0.0
0.0
Epinephelus septemfasciatus
0.0
0.0
Acanthopagrus schlegelii
0.0
0.0
Oplegnathus fasciatus
0.0
0.0
Pagrus major
0.0
0.0
Other sea breams
0.0
0.0
Miichthys miiuy
0.0
0.0
Sciaenops ocellatus
0.0
0.0
Fish
Seriola quinqueradiata
0.0
0.0
Puffers
0.0
0.0
Sebastes schlegeli
0.0
0.0
Other rock fishes
0.0
0.0
Muguil spp.
0.0
0.0
Pleurogrammus azonus
0.0
0.0
Konosirus punctatus
0.0
0.0
Stephanolepis sp.; Thamnaconus sp.
0.0
0.0
Other finfishes
0.0
0.0
subtotal
394.0
1196.8
Fenneropenaeus chinensis
272.0
1642.4
Penaeus japonicus
0.0
0.0
Crustacean
Other crustaceans
0.0
0.0
subtotal
272.0
1642.4
Shellfish
Crassostrea gigas
286.0
2327.5
Rapana venosa
0.0
0.0
Haliotis discus hannai
377.0
948.1
Chlamys farreri nipponensis
31.0
203.0
Cyclina sinensis
105.0
1021.0
Mactra chinensis
3.0
46.0
Scapharca subcrenata
57.0
649.0
Solen spp.
0.0
0.0
Ruditapes philippinarum
349.0
3786.0
Meretrix lusoria
10.0
181.0
Atrina pectinata
0.0
0.0
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 19
Scapharca broughtonii
64.0
1041.0
Mactra veneriformis
8.0
60.0
Mytilus coruscus
17.0
232.0
Other shellfish
3.0
3.0
subtotal
1310
10497.6
Porphyra spp.
611.0
16041.0
Laminaria japonica
40.0
265.5
Undaria pinnatifida
28.0
347.0
Gelidium amansii
0.0
0.0
Gigartina spp.
0.0
0.0
Seaweed
Codium fragile
0.0
0.0
Hijika fusiforme
20.0
212.5
Enteromorpha spp.
0.0
0.0
Sargassum fulvellum
6.0
47.0
Other seaweed
0.0
0.0
subtotal
705.0
16913.0
sp.1+sp.2
25.0
206.5
sp.3+sp.4
0.0
0.0
Polyculture
sp.5+sp.6
0.0
0.0
sp.7+sp.8
0.0
0.0
subtotal
25
206.5
species 1
733.0
25141.0
species 2
0.0
0.0
Collective
species 3
0.0
0.0
farms
species 4
0.0
0.0
subtotal
733
25141
Synthina roretzi
0.0
0.0
Stichopus japonicus
9.0
75.0
Others
Styela clava
0.0
0.0
polychaetes
0.0
0.0
Others
17.8
42.2
subtotal
26.8
117.2
total(mt)
3465.8
55714.5
year
Kind
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
No
ha No ha No ha No ha No ha No ha No ha No ha No ha
No
ha
Fish
394.0
1196.8
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 20
Crustacean
272.0
1642.4
Shellfish
1310
10497.6
Seaweed
705.0
16913.0
Polyculture
25
206.5
Collective farms
733
25141
Others
26.8
117.2
Total
3465.8
55714.5
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 21
Table X. Overview of Aquaculture Methods for XXXX Year
(No, number of licenses; ha, farmed area)
Province
Gyeonggi-
Chungnam-
Jeongbuk-
Kind Habitat(meth
Incheon
ods)
Jeonnam-do
total
do
do
do
No.
ha
No.
ha
No.
ha No.
ha No. ha No. ha
Land-based tank culture
2
0.1
1
0.4
5
0.4
7
0.3
154
23.6
169
24.8
Pond culture
26
214.7
2
26.3
23
184.5
21
77.0
56
387.2
128
889.7
Fish
Cage culture
5
5.0
6
7.0
40
118.0
8
8.0
38
144.3
97
282.3
Other methods
0
0.0
subtotal
33
219.8
9
33.7
68
302.9
36
85.3
248
555.1
394
1196.8
Pond culture
32
99.3
32
139.6
91
752.6
65
398.4
52
252.5
272
1642.4
Crustacean
subtotal
32
99.3
32
139.6
91
752.6
65
398.4
52
252.5
272
1642.4
Hanging culture
22
165.0
15
102.0
61
296.0
1
10.0
22
85.0
121
658.0
Bottom culture
129
1309.0
30
470.0 341
2822.0 335
3165.0
169
1883.5 1004
9649.5
Shellfish
Cage culture
8
19.0
0
0.0
1
5.0
1
1.0
47
137.0
57
162.0
Land-based tank culture
6
0.2
0
0.0
2
0.3
0
0.0
120
27.6
128
28.1
subtotal
165 1493.2
45
572.0 405
3123.3 337 3176.0
358
2133.1
1310
10497.6
Net culture(floating, pole methods)
17
427.0
25
799.0
54
3155.0
96
2552.0
419
9108.0
611
16041.0
Long-lined culture
17
132.0
0
0.0
14
207.0
0
0.0
37
273.5
68
612.5
Seaweed
Other methods
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
10.0
1
10.0
24
239.5
26
259.5
subtotal
34
559.0
25
799.0
69
3372.0
97
2562.0
480
9621.0
705
16913.0
Seaweed+seaweed
0
0.0
Seaweed+shellfish
2
22.0
6
61.0
1
17.0
0
0.0
16
106.5
25
206.5
Polyculture
Shellfish+shellfish
0
0.0
Others
0
0.0
subtotal
2
22.0
6
61.0
1
17.0
0
0.0
16
106.5
25
206.5
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 22
Sea cucumber
Pond culture
0
0.0
0
0.0
7
25.0
2
50.0
0
0.0
9
75.0
Polychaetes
Pond culture
0
0.0
Others
Others
3
16.2
0
0.0
2
6.0
9
12.5
4
7.4
18
42.1
subtotal
3
16.2
0
0.0
9
31.0
11
62.5
4
7.4
27
117.1
Bottom culture
118
1638.0
77
3621.0 194
4576.0
48
1361.0
296
13945.0
733
25141.0
Seaweed
0
0.0
Collective farms
Others
0
0.0
subtotal
118 1638.0
77
3621.0 194
4576.0
48
1361.0
296
13945.0
733
25141.0
Total
387
4047.5
194
5226.3
837
12174.8
594
7645.2 1454
26620.6
3466
55714.4
Province
Gyeonggi-
Chungnam-
Jeongbuk-
Kind
Habitat(methods)
Incheon
Jeonnam-do
total
do
do
do
No.
ha
No.
ha
No.
ha No.
ha No. ha No. ha
Tank culture(fish, shellfish)
8
0.3
1
0.4
7
0.7
7
0.3
274
51.2
297
52.9
Pond culture(fish, shrimp)
58
314
34
165.9 121
962.1
88
525.4
108
639.7
409
2607.1
Cage culture(fish, shellfish)
13
24
6
7
41
123
9
9
85
281.3
154
444.3
Hanging culture(shellfish)
22
165
15
102
61
296
1
10
22
85
121
658
Bottom culture(shellfish)
247
2947 107
4091 535
7398 383
4526
465
15828.5 1737
34790.5
Total
Net culture(seaweed)
17
427
25
799
54
3155
96
2552
419
9108
611
16041
Long-lined culture(seaweed)
17
132
0
0
14
207
0
0
37
273.5
68
612.5
Other methods(seaweed)
0
0
0
0
1
10
1
10
24
239.5
26
259.5
Polyculture(seaweed+shellfish)
2
22
6
61
1
17
0
0
16
106.5
25
206.5
Others
3
16.2
0
0
2
6
9
12.5
4
7.4
18
42.1
Grand total
387
4047.5
194
5226.3
837
12174.8
594
7645.2 1454
26620.6
3466
55714.4
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 23
Socio-Economic Data and Information.
Vessels by Fishery
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Number
Power Vessel
Non-power Vessel
Total
GT
Power Vessel
Non-power Vessel
Number
Distant Waters Fisheries
GT
Number
Off-shore, Coastal Fisheries
GT
Vessels by Province
Number
Name 1
GT
Number
"
GT
Number
"
GT
Number
"
GT
Number
"
GT
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 24
Number of Fishermen by Province
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
No. of Persons
Province 1
Province 2
Province
"
"
"
Fisheries Income
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Fisheries Income
(USD) by country
Fisheries consumption per capita (kg)
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Total
Exports of fishery products
2000
2001 2002 2003 2004
Total
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex III
Page 25
Imports of fishery products
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Total
Economic importance of fisheries (GDP Contribution)
2000 2001 2002 2003
2004
GDP
Fisheries
GDP
Contribution
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex IV
Page 1
Annex IV
Agreed List of Species
To be used in the data collection and analysis
No.
English Name
Scientific Name
Chinese Name
Korean Name
1
Small yellow Croaker
Larimichthys polyactis
2 Spanish
Mackerel
Scomberomorus niphonius
3 Anchovy
Engraulis japonicus
4 Chub
Mackerel
Scomber japonicus
5 Large-head
Hairtail
Trichiurus lepturus
6 Pacific
Herring
Clupea pallasii
7 Sandlance
Ammodytes personatus
8 Acetes
Acetes chinensis and A. japonicus
9 Fleshy
Prawn
Fenneropenaeus chinensis
10 Squid
Todarodes pacificus, Loligo sp. and Sepia sp.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex V
Page 1
Annex V
Data and Information Table
Problem
Type of Data Required
Type, Unit and Frequency:
Temporal
Available:
Available:
Requirements:
ROK?
CHINA?
Decline in Many
Landings
Tonnes, by species (10 important species)
30
years
Y
(18 years - 1986 to
Y (18 years - 1986 to
Commercially
2004)
2004)
Important Fishery
Species
Fishing Effort
No. Boats, by fishery (not by fishery total
30 years
Y (18 years - 1986 to
Y (18 years - 1986 to
only)
2004)
2004)
HP of boats, by fishery (not by fishery total
30 years
Y (18 years - 1986 to
Y (18 years - 1986 to
only)
2004)
2004)
Composition of Catch
% Species of catch (10 species) 30
years Y
(18 years - 1986 to
Y (18 years - 1986 to
2004)
2004)
Biological data
Growth pattern by species,spawning
10 indicator
Y Y
season, etc.
species
Reproduction, by Species
10 indicator
Y Y
species
Spawning Season, by Species
10 indicator
Y Y
species
Survey Result
Species Composition
20 years
5 coastal, annualy. Once
2-3times in every decade
In 1970s.
since 1980s with large
coverage.
Biomass (Korea to check, have trawl survey
20 years
5 coastal, annualy. Once
2-3times in every decade
relative biomass), (China has)
In 1970s.
since 1980s with large
coverage.
Environmental Charateristics - delete this
20 years
5 coastal, annualy. Once
2-3times in every decade
parameter
In 1970s.
since 1980s with large
coverage.
Icthyoplankton
20 years
5 coastal, annualy. Once
2-3times in every decade
In 1970s.
since 1980s with large
coverage.
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex V
Page 2
New Survey Result
Species Composition, Biomass, and
2 surveys/Jan;
Icthyoplankton
May.
Ecological Characteristics
Migration pattern by species, spawning and
10 species
Y
Y
nursery areas by species (From YSEPP
data set)
Lack of knowledge of
Basin-Scale survey, Existing
Estimated from survey data - e.g Stomach
N
Y
Carrying Capacity
methods/models
Contents (number species, weight,
frequency)
Unsustainable
Change in extent of marine
ha per region (province, habitat) per annum
Min 25 yrs
10 years (1995 to 2004) 10
years (1995 to 2004)
Mariculture
farms
Change in marine farming
Tonnes per species (or kinds of orgarnisms)
10 years (1995 to 2004) 10
years (1995 to 2004)
production
per annum
10 years (1995 to 2004) 10
years (1995 to 2004)
(Abundance and distribution of important
Environmentally
Change in the condition of
species) delete ...List of diseases and
Destructive
habitats in the vicinity of
variation (conversion of natural habitat to
aquaculture practices
aquaculture facilities
farming areas) of farming, case studies.
At least 10 years
No. of vessels, power and gross tons
from 2000 to 2004
from 2000 to 2004
Socio-economic Data
Required
Vessels by Fishery
Province, No. persons
from 2000 to 2004
from 2000 to 2004
Number of Fisherman by
Region (by province)
Fisheries Income
by country, by fisherperson
from 2000 to 2004
from 2000 to 2004
by country, per kg, per capita
from 2000 to 2004
from 2000 to 2004
Fishery Consumption Per
Capita
by country, value (USD), volume
from 2000 to 2004
from 2000 to 2004
Fishery Export and Import
%GDP (investment group may provide
from 2000 to 2004
from 2000 to 2004
Economic Importance of
Employment data)
Fisheries (e.g. Employment,
GDP Contribution)
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex VI
Page 1
Annex VI
Revised causal chain analysis
If yes,
Priority
priority
rank
rank
Immediate Causes
Trans-
(H, M,
Problem
Impacts
(Technical)
Underlying cause
Root cause
Governance
(H, M, L)
boundary?
L)
Fisheries Issues
Decline in
Reduction in trophic level, Over-exploitation of Insufficient
management Increasing demand for
CONDITIONS of
Reduction in overall size of target species
and control of fisheries marine resources due to
Many
some commercially valuable
activities, Over-Capacity of rapid population and
Commercially
species, Change in
fishing fleets, Illegal
economic expansion
Important
composition of species
Fishing,
Insufficient
Fishery Species
monitoring and
Insufficient legal instruments
enforcement,
weak
at national and regional
scientific-based knowledge
levels, insufficient
on status of stocks
implementation of national
regulatory instruments; lack
of regional harmonization of
regulations(?). Insufficient
knowledge and infrastructure
base
H Y
H
Uncontrolled
Damage to coastal natural (deleted 'Over-
Increasing mariculture
Increasing demand for
Aquaculture
habitat
(deleted extensive and')
activities,
Effect of
marine resources
Practices
'infrastructure'), damage to Over-intensive
mariculture activities on (mariculture products) due
environmental quality,
aquaculture
surrounding habitats
to rapid population and
Intrduction of pathogens, activities and Over-
economic expansion
increase in disease outbreak
exploitation of
natural habitats,
Introduction of
Inadequate legal instruments
foreign species
at national and regional
levels, inadequate
implementation of national
regulatory instruments; lack
of regional harmonization of
regulations. Inadequate
knowledge and infrastructure
base H
Y
H
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex VI
Page 2
Inadequate
Incapacity to adequately Insufficient
Insufficient knowledge and Poor regional coordination,
Capacity to
manage activities and
information
and infrastructure base
communication and
Assess
management resources, and environmental
collaboration, insufficient
Ecosystem
mitigate effects
impact assessments
financing mechanisms and
support
Insufficient understanding
and associated policies
M
Y
M
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex VII
Page 1
Annex VII
A.
Fisheries Component Cooperative Study Cruise Final Budget
Budget
Unit cost
Budget Item
Units
Subtotal
Purchase country / Remarks
Distribution
(USD)
China
Korea
Activities
Prepare for Joint Survey
China, assorted reagents and
Prepare reagents and chemicals
chemical for numerous processes,
for analyses
10.00
300.00
3,000.00 average price=$10.
100%
Bottles and fish boxes and
baskets
15.00
300.00
4,500.00 China
100%
China, sampling knives, surgical
Dissection tools and measuring
equipment, and scientific
boards
50.00
40.00
2,000.00 measuring equipment
100%
National Meeting: Coordination
and logistics
140.00
20.00
2,800.00 5 persons per country
50%
50%
Transportation for scientists
650.00
5.00
3,250.00 5 Korean scientists come to China
100%
Regional Meeting: Attended by
both countries. Prepare unified
10 persons, 2 days meeting in
methods and standards
110.00
20.00
2,200.00 China 45%
55%
Transportation, Calibration of all
Adjust in situ instruments and
equipment, standards, reagents,
devices
1,000.00
1.00
1,000.00 etc. 100%
Subtotal
18,750.00
Hardship allowance
30.00
252
7,560.00 12 scientists, 21 days, $30/day
6,300.00
After survey
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex VII
Page 2
Air tickets Korea to China) Activity:
Improve analytical procedures and
methods
650.00
5.00
3,250.00 5 Korean scientists come to China
100%
Activity: Processing of biological
8 person, 15 days in China (4 per
specimens in Lab.
70.00
120.00
8,400.00 country) 50%
50%
Activity: Acoustic estimation and
2 persons 15 days in China (one
preparing data in Lab.
110.00
30.00
3,300.00 per country)
50%
50%
Laboratory Costs: Consumables
and Utilities
50.00
15.00
750.00 15 days in China
100%
Preparing cruise report meeting
200.00
21.00
4,200.00 7 person, 3 days in Korea
50.0%
50.0%
Air tickets (China to Korea)
650.00
2.00
1,300.00 2 Chinese scientists come to Korea
100%
5 persons, 2 days in each country,
includes meeting room,
Meeting in each nation
140.00
20.00
2,800.00 accommodation, meals.
50%
50%
Stomach contents analysis
60.00
30.00
1,800.00 2 person, 15 days in each country
50%
50%
Identification of egg and larvae
60.00
30.00
1,800.00 2 person, 15 days in each country
50%
50%
Move all facilities and devices to
Institutions in Korea and China
30.00
100.00
3,000.00 Korean & Chinese
10%
90%
Data analysis
60.00
30.00
1,800.00 2 person, 15 days in each country
50%
50%
Preparing the survey results report
110.00
36.00
3,960.00 3 person, 6 days in each country
50%
50%
Subtotal
36,360.00
Equipment (Purchase and
transport)
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex VII
Page 3
(sensitivity 0.1g,0.01 g), and
Electronic balances
2,000.00
3.00
6,000.00
hanging balances
100%
Ichthyoplankton nets (Bongo)
7,800.00
1.00
7,800.00
2 Bongo,
100%
Horizontal nets
300.00
4.00
1,200.00
Horizontal trawling
100%
Spare parts
1000 cables, for on-board equipment
100
16,000.00
Total
77,410.00
B. List of Samples to be Relocated to Korea from China at the End of the Cruise
ITEM
UNIT
VOLUME QUANTITY
TYPE
REMARK
Ichthyoplankton(Egg & Larvae)
92
Formalin
Vertical sample
BOTTLE
1 L
46
Liquid
solution
Formalin
Horizontal sample
BOTTLE
1 L
46
Liquid
solution
Stomach
10
Target species
- Cod
PVC
Formalin
20 L
1
Liquid
(Gadus macrocephalus)
CONTAINER
solution
- Small yellow croaker
PVC
Formalin
20 L
1
Liquid
(Larimichthys polyactis)
CONTAINER
solution
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex VII
Page 4
- Yellow goosefish
PVC
Formalin
20 L
1
Liquid
(Lophius litulon)
CONTAINER
solution
- Skate ray
PVC
Formalin
20 L
1
Liquid
(Okamejei kenojei)
CONTAINER
solution
- Grassfish
PVC
Formalin
20 L
1
Liquid
(Liparis tanakai)
CONTAINER
solution
PVC
Formalin
Dominant species
20 L
5
Liquid
CONTAINER
solution
Otoliths (fish)
1000
Target species
- Cod
BOTTLE
5 ml
100
Liquid
Water
(Gadus macrocephalus)
- Small yellow croaker
BOTTLE
5 ml
100
Liquid
Water
(Larimichthys polyactis)
- Marbled sole
BOTTLE
5 ml
100
Liquid
Water
(Limanda yokohamae)
- Pointhead flounder
BOTTLE
5 ml
100
Liquid
Water
(Cleisthenes pinetorum)
- Croaker
BOTTLE
5 ml
100
Liquid
Water
(Collichthys niveatus)
Dominant species
BOTTLE
5 ml
500
Liquid
Water
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex VII
Page 5
C. Workplan for Fisheries Component for the Winter Cooperative Study Cruise
ID
Task Name
'05 Jun
'05 Jul
'05 Aug
'05 Sep
'05 Oct
'05 Nov
'05 Dec
'06 Jan
'06 Feb
'06 Mar
'06 Apr
'06 May
'06 Jun
'06 Jul
'06 Aug
'06 Sep
'06 Oct
'06 Nov
'06 Dec
'0
30 06 13 20 27 04 11 18 25 01 08 15 22 29 05 12 19 26 03 10 17 24 31 07 14 21 28 05 12 19 26 02 09 16 23 30 06 13 20 27 06 13 20 27 03 10 17 24 01 08 15 22 29 05 12 19 26 03 10 17 24 31 07 14 21 28 04 11 18 25 02 09 16 23 30 06 13 20 27 04 11 18 25 01
1
JOINT CRUISE
2
PRE-CRUISE ACTIVITIES
3
Joint Cruise Meeting
YSLME PMO
4
Pollution Component
5
Refine the workplan
6
Prepare agents and chemicals for analyses
7
Prepare unified methods and standards
8
Particpate in intercalibration exercise among labs
9
Summarize results from inter-calibration exercise
10
Improve analytical procedures and methods
11
Prepare devices and storage bottles
12
Prepare all standards and reagents
13
Decide the data format and recording tables
14
Prepare for Joint Survey
15
Adjust in situ instruments and devices
16
Move all facilities and devices to Qingdao
17
Fisheries Component
18
Prepare reagents and chemicals for the analysis
19
Bottles and fish boxes and baskets
20
Dissection tools and measuirng boards
21
Transportation for Scientists
22
Prepare unified methods and standards
23
Adjust in situ instruments and devices
24
Ecosystem Component
25
Begin procurement of equipment
26
Procure Expendables
27
Meeting of National Working Group for Ecosystem
28
Discuss and agree on the detalied methods and sampling plan
29
Meetings of Regional Working Group for Ecosystem
30
Discuss and agree on the detailed methods and sampling plan
31
Meeting 1
32
Discuss and agree on the detailed methods and sampling plan
33
BEI DOU PREPARATION FOR SAILING
34
Vessel Loading
35
All equipment onboard vessel
Participants
36
Personnel to Qingdao
Participants
37
Install personnel and Equipment (and test)
38
All personnel onboard vessel
39
CRUISE ACTIVITIES
40
Survey underway
Bei Dou and Team Leader
41
POST-CRUISE ACTIVITIES
42
Pollution Component
43
Separate samples and deliver to different labs
44
Analyse all samples
45
Process data
46
Exchange data
47
Discuss the findings or issues
48
Analyse data
49
Final report on first cooperative study cruise with data set and pre
50
Reporting
51
Ecosystem Component
52
Sample and data analyses
53
Visit of Korean scientist to China for sample analysis
54
Assessment of current productivity and structure in the lower trop
55
Synthesize the results from different levels and discuss how to ma
56
Fisheries Component
57
Improve analytical procedures and methods
58
Processing of biological specimens in lab
59
Preparing cruise meeting report
60
Airtickets
61
Stomach content analysis
62
Identification of egg and larvae
63
Move all facilities and devices to institutions in Korean and China
64
Data analysis
65
Preparing the survey results report
UNDP/GEF/YS/RWG-F.2/3
Annex VIII
Page 1
Annex VIII
Workplan for Fisheries Component
2005 to 2006
ID
Task Name
2005, Half 1
2005, Half 2
2006, Half 1
2006, Half 2
2007, Half 1
2007, Half 2
2008, Half 1
2008, Half 2
2009, Half 1
2009, Half 2
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
1
OBJECTIVE I: FISHERIES COMPONENT
2
IA: STOCK ASSESMENT
3
ACT 1: Review of existing data
4
Regional Working Group (WG) Meeting 1
5
Contract to relevant national institutions (contract)
6
Revise national data and info (contract)
7
ACT 2: Diagnosis of Stock Conditions
8
Finalisation of data and info at WG Meeting 3
9
Inputs to final TDA
10
ACT 3: Develop Common methodology of regional stock
assessement
11
Gathering existing methods, prepare suggested methods (consultant)
12
Discuss the methods (WG Meeting 3)
13
Revise regional methods (consultant)
14
Discuss and modify the methods (WG Meeting 4)
15
Finalise the method (WG Meeting 4)
16
ACT 4: Perform Demonstration of Joint-Regional Survey
17
Winter Survey
18
Prepare guidelines for survey (consultant)
19
Accept guidelines (Technical Meeting 1 - Qingdao)
20
Obtain and Assemble Equipment
21
Ship Rental for first Joint Survey
22
Analyse survey result (participants of survey)
23
Publish survey result (printing)(PMO)
24
Spring Survey
25
Prepare guidelines for survey (consultant)
26
Accept guidelines (Technical Meeting 2 - ?)
27
Obtain and Assemble Equipment
28
Ship Rental for Second Joint Survey
29
Analyse survey result (participants)
30
Publish survey result (printing)
31
ACT 5: Perform Initial Joint Regional Stock Assessment
32
Prepare a plan for stock assessment (Consultant)
33
Technical discussion on the plan (WG Meeting 4)
34
Implement regional stock assessment
35
Discuss results of assessment (WG Meeting 5)
36
Additional assessment if necessary (contracts)
37
Accept the assessment result (WG Meeting 6)??
38
Publication of assessment results (printing)
39
ACT 6: Create mechanism for regional multispecies stock assessme
40
Identify major barriers in stock assessment (WG Meeting 2)
41
Identify the species to be assessed (WG Meeting 2)
42
Prepare draft mechanism for annual assessment (Consultant)
43
Discuss the draft mechanism (WG Meeting 3)
44
Revise the draft mechanism (consultant)
45
Finalisation of the mechanism (WG Meeting 4)
46
IB: CARRYING CAPACITY
47
ACT 1: Review of existing state of knowledge
48
Contract to relevant national institutions for assessing information (con
49
Present at WG Meeting 2
50
Revise national state of knowledge
51
Finalisation of report (WG Meeting 3)
52
Inputs to final TDA
53
ACT 2: Fill in knowledge gaps for carrying capacity analysis
54
Prepare guidelines for carrying capacity (consultant)
55
Act 3: Perform iterative series of analysis of carrying capacity
56
Prepare workplan for the analysis (consultant)
57
Discuss and agree on the workplan (WG Meeting 4)
58
Implement the workplan (contracts to national focal points)
59
ACT 4: Annual carrying capacity determination
60
Gathering the results of the analysis (PMO)
61
Scientific seminar (togethor with WG Meeting 5)
62
Annual carrying capacity determination (scientific seminar)
63
Publication of regional carrying capacity
64
IC: MARICULTURE PRODUCTION
65
ACT1 : Review existing status and trends of mariculture
66
Regional Working Group Meeting 1
67
Contract to relevant national insitutions for assessing information (Co
68
ACT 2: Develop joint applied research programme for sustainable
mariculture
69
Prepare a draft joint research plan (consultant)
70
Present draft to the WG Meeting 3
71
Revise the draft according to the agreement
72
Finalise the plan in WG Meeting 4
73
Prepare technical guidelines (consultant)
74
Training course on mariculture techniques
75
ACT 3: Pilot in demonstration projects in mariculture
76
Selection sites for pilot demonstration projects WG Meeting 3
77
Implementation of the pilot activities (contract)
78
Present results to WG Meeting 4
79
Publication of the results (printing)
80
ACT 4: Facilitate communications about new diseases , diagnoses
and control techniques
81
Develop mechanism regional network on information sharing and quic
82
Agreement at WG Meeting 4
83
Prepare technical guidelines (consultant)
84
Training course on disease diagnosis , prevention and control
85
ID: REGIONAL AGREEMENTS AND NATIONAL LAWS &
MANAGEMENT PLAN
86
ACT 1: Review existing national laws and regulations on fisheries
and mariculture, and pretinent international agreements
87
Contract to relevant national institutions to assess information on
laws and regulation and national responsibility of regional and Int'l
88
Publication of the existing knowledge togethor with analysis and
suggestions
89
ACT 2: Develop regional agreement for sustainable use of fisheries
resources
90
Feasibility study on regional managment (in particular to implement
the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries)
91
Prepare draft regional managment proposal
92
Discuss the draft regional management proposal (WG Meeting 4)
93
Revise the draft (Consultant)
94
Discuss draft proposal at WG Meeting 5 (repeat if necessary)
95
Finalise the proposal and provide to NPCs for delivery to the
respective governments
96
ACT 3: Propose measures for strengthening laws and regulations
97
Enforcement will be considered together with Activity 2
98
ACT 4: Development of regional fisheries
management/implementation plans, including regional recovery
99
Identify regional requirements and target for regional SAP (consultant)
100
Prepare national SAP (contract to focal points)
101
Discuss draft national SAP (WG Meeting ?)
102
Revise national SAP
103
Finalise national SAP
104
Discuss framework of regional SAP (WG Meeting ?)
105
Prepare draft regional SAP (consultant)
106
Discuss and revise (WG Meetings ? and ? if necessary)
107
Implement reg'l management plan