Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Why a biodiversity training framework in Namibia…??
___________________________
  • Sem T Shikongo


  • National Biodiversity Programme
  • Ministry of Environment & Tourism
  • Directorate of Environmental Affairs
2
 
3
Because Namibia depends on biodiversity and biological resources for so many economic sectors
  • Tourism
  • Trade
  • Fisheries
  • Forestry
  • Agriculture
  • Health
  • Diverse types of rural development
4
 
5
"Because Namibia's undergraduate training rarely..."
  • Because Namibia's undergraduate training rarely produces independent, able professionals


  • Because it's difficult to hire qualified, committed Namibian staff (NBRI, National Museum, MET/ NBP)


  • Because there's an imbalance between practical and theoretical training
6
Because most Namibian biodiversity specialists are getting old!
7
Training and mentorship are needed to help impassion the next generation
8
Because biodiversity expertise in science, policy, economics and law
is essential for sustainable development
9
"Because there's no point in..."
  • Because there's no point in having noble strategies and policies on paper


  • …. if there's no-one to implement them!
10
And because it's long overdue…
11
AIMS OF THE TRAINING FRAMEWORK
  • Strengthen the biodiversity component in the existing/planned initiatives
  • Integrate and further support ongoing initiatives
  • Identify gaps
  • Plan additional activities and solicit funding


12
Conclusions
  • Need to identify national needs and existing gaps
  •  Training to be offered should be institution base
  • Gaining international experience is very important – through creating a competitive working environment
  • Assessment on training needs to expanded
  • There is a need for a more detailed study on the job market in relation to loss of trained staff
  • “Out-stations” professionals need to be considered in this training framework
  • Skills-base training is one of the outcome of the survey – this could be addresses thru curricular development (primary, secondary or tertiary level)



13
Conclusions
  • There is a need for restructuring of the science education in Namibia to improve our research skills
  • Namibia need to develop serious incentive systems to foster effective training
  • Institutions need to create positions with strategies to address continuous staff training needs.
  • Institutions such as Scientific Society does not efficiently address needs of Namibia
  • Financing biodiversity training initiatives can be an obstacle


14
Recommendations
  • A need to develop short professional courses on priority biodiversity needs (courses could also be extended to other SADC countries)
  • NNBP to provide guidance on the development of in-house training.
  • Provide regular environmental information service (workshops, webpage)
  • Ensure the UNAM/Humboldt University M.Sc address Namibian biodiversity and training priorities
  • Help review UNAM, Polytechnic/Gobabeb training centre training modules
15
Reccommendations
  • Attach Namibian and international experts to relevant public presentations
  • Develop in-house portfolio in MET and outsource as required
  • Strengthen, and make use of DEA/MET Friday afternoon seminar series and DRFN “Food for thought” meetings and encourage other organisations to organise and advertise similar events.
  • Intergrate and upscale DRFN/SDP training in regular tertiary education curricular