U

NDP Project Document


PDF B Project



The Governments of the Republic of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine



United Nations Development Programme

UNDP-GEF

UNOPS




Implementation of Priority Interventions of the Dnipro Basin Strategic Action Program: Chemical Industrial Pollution Reduction and The Development of Joint Institutional Arrangements










This PDF B Project builds on the previous GEF investment in the Dnipro Basin, the development and country adoption of the Dnipro Basin Strategic Action Programme.


The PDF B Project will therefore prepare a Full-Sized Project Proposal addressing the problems of cleaner production and effluent pre-treatment for smaller and in many cases privatised industries, discharging through the Vodokanals. This will also address issues of sustainable financing mechanisms and legal and regulatory requirements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


TABLE OF CONTENTS 2

ACRONYMS 3

SECTION I: ELABORATION OF THE NARRATIVE 5

PART I: SITUATION ANALYSIS 5

PART II: STRATEGY 5

PART III : MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS 5

Supervision: 5

General Management 6

Financing 6

Participating Agencies 6

PART IV: Monitoring and Evaluation 7

PART V: Legal Context 7

SECTION II: STRATEGIC RESULTS FRAMEWORK 8

Table 1: Indicative Outputs, Activities and quarterly workplan 8

SECTION III: TOTAL BUDGET AND WORKPLAN 9

SECTION IV: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 11

PART I : 11

PDF B proposal: 11

Other agreements: 11

PART II : ORGANIGRAM OF PROJECT (OPTIONAL) 11

PART III : TERMS OF REFERENCES FOR KEY PROJECT STAFF AND MAIN SUB-CONTRACTS 11

Project Manager 11

The Deputy Project Manager - River Basin Management Expert 12

Projects Coordinator 13

Administrator 14

SIGNATURE PAGE 16


Annex A Project Proposal En.doc

ACRONYMS


CIDA

Canadian International Development Agency

BATNEEC

Best Available Technology Not Entailing Excessive Costs

CIS

Commonwealth of Independent States

CPC

Cleaner Production Centre

CTA

Chief Technical Adviser

DEPA

Danish Environmental Protection Agency

DFID

UK Department for International Development

EBRD

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

ECA

Europe and Central Asia countries

EST

Environmentally Sound Technology

EU

European Union

FPP

Full-Sized Project Proposal

GEF

Global Environmental Facility

GEFSEC

GEF Secretariat

GIWA

Global International Waters Assessment

IAEA

International Atomic Energy Agency

IDRC

International Development Research Centre (Canada)

IW

International Waters

IW LEARN

UNDP/GEF Project on International Waters Distance Learning and Training

IWTF

International Waters Task Force

JMC

Joint Management Committee

LFA

Logical Framework Analysis

MAC

Maximum Acceptable Concentrations

MAP

Mediterranean Action Plan

NAP

National Action Plan

M&E

Monitoring and Evaluation

NGO

Non-Governmental Organization

NIS

Newly Independent States

PAL

Programmatic Adjustment Loans

PDF B

Project Development Facility, Interim Stage

PIP

Priority Investment Portfolio

PMU

Programme Management Unit

ProDoc

Project Document

SAP

Strategic Action Programme

SC

Steering Committee

STAP

Scientific Technical Advising Personnel

TACIS

EU Programme for Technical Assistance for the Commonwealth of Independent States

TDA

Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis

TEST

Danube project on Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technology

The Agreement

Agreement on Cooperation in the Field of Management and Protection of the Dnipro Basin”

TMP

Transboundary Monitoring Program

TOR

Terms of References

UAH

Ukrainian Hryvna

UN ECE

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

UNDP

United Nations Development Program

UNEP

United Nations Environment Programme

UNIDO

United Nations Industrial Development Organization

UNOPS

United Nations Office for Project Services

USAID

United States Agency for International Development

USD

United States Dollars (US$)

SECTION I: ELABORATION OF THE NARRATIVE


PART I: SITUATION ANALYSIS


The development of the Dnipro Basin Strategic Action Program (SAP) followed on from concerns expressed in the 1990s about the progressive degradation of the Dnipro River ecosystem, particularly in the middle and lower reaches. These concerns tied in closely with those raised over the degradation of the Black Sea which is now widely recognized as one of the regional seas most damaged by human activity. The PDF B project provides the logical link between the previous GEF investment in the Dnipro Basin, the development and country adoption of the Dnipro Basin Strategic Action Program, and the future GEF support to a Full-Sized Project Proposal to directly address the priority International Waters issue of industrial chemical pollution.


PART II: STRATEGY


The Dnipro SAP has identified that the regional priority is the need to address industrial chemical pollution. Within this broad sector, other agencies are proposing to address problems in some of the major industrial complexes, leaving out the issue of pollution generated by the many smaller industries that discharge effluents through municipal waste facilities – the Vodokanals. The PDF B Project will therefore prepare a Full-Sized Project Proposal addressing the problems of cleaner production and effluent pre-treatment for smaller and in many cases privatised industries, discharging through the Vodokanals. This will also address issues of sustainable financing mechanisms and legal and regulatory requirements. However, as the implementation of these activities will take place within the framework of the SAP, supported by regional and national legislation, the project will also deal with the institutional development of the SAP management bodies. It will also address transboundary monitoring issues to provide key information to these management bodies on the effectiveness of SAP implementation.


PART III : MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS


Supervision:

The PDF B will build on the experience of the preceding GEF Dnipro project and will continue to operate with its existing management structure composed of three committee levels and the PMU.


The most critical management meetings will continue to be the annual Steering Committee meetings, which will generally be held back to back with the project Joint Management Committee meetings.


The first set of meetings are expected to include a Joint Management Committee Meeting to suggest modifications and approve the proposed workplan for the PDF B. This will then be followed by three National Management Committee meetings to review and approve the national consultation processes. These should take place in May/June 2005.


The first SCM is scheduled for February 2006, and in addition to their normal TORs the SC will be asked to review the first draft of the FPP, which will be complete with the exception of the project M&E, the LFA and incremental cost analysis. UNDP will participate in this meeting which can be considered as both a tri-partite review and the mid-term evaluation.


The second SCM is scheduled for February 2007, by which time it is anticipated that the FPP will have been approved by the GEF, and a final ProDoc provided to UNDP. Again UNDP will be a participant in this meeting, which can be considered as both a tri-partite review and the Terminal/Final evaluation of the PDF B.


This meeting will provide the opportunity for UNDP to discuss the details of the FPP with the national and regional organisations who will be largely responsible for supervising and implementing the project.


General Management

For the purposes of the PDF B the PMU will be staffed as follows: Senior Program Advisor/CTA (full time, reducing to part time following the acceptance of the FPP by the GEF); Deputy Program Manager/River Basin Expert; Projects Coordinator; and Administrator.


In terms of regular administrative reporting, the PMU will provide quarterly reports to the executing agency and UNDP, and an annual project report to UNDP. The PMU will also assist UNDP/GEF in preparing the annual Project Implementation Review.


In addition to the specific outputs of the PDF B project towards the FPP, there are a number of general support activities that will be provided by the PMU. These will include the provision of library resources, communications, report duplication, translation services, and the organization of SC and JMC meetings. There will continue to be some overheads and administration resources associated with the continued functioning of the national offices in Belarus and Russia.


It is expected that the PMU, will be continue to be based in Kyiv, Ukraine for the duration of the PDF B project. While the host country may make office space available, an allowance should be made for renting an office for the project period.


Financing

GEF will commit $700,000 to finance the PDF B. In order to accord proper acknowledgement to GEF for providing funding, a GEF logo should appear on all relevant GEF project publications, including among others, project hardware and vehicles purchased with GEF funds. Any citation on publications regarding projects funded by GEF should also accord proper acknowledgment to GEF.


Participating Agencies

The preceding GEF project involved a number of Implementing Agencies and Executing Agencies. The Implementing Agency was UNDP, and the Executing Agency was UNOPS and IDRC. These agencies were able to bring in considerable International Waters expertise, both from projects in the area (the Caspian Sea, the Black Sea, the Danube) as well as projects in other regions. The current PDF B will involve UNDP and UNOPS in their same capacities as in the preceding project.


One of the immediate major tasks of the management body will be to attract and coordinate bi-lateral and multi-lateral co-financing for projects.


In this respect the PDF B project will contact UNIDO and the relevant national CPCs and establish what level of support they can presently provide to the preparation and later implementation of the FPP. The PMU will review the need to establish additional centers, or to build on the capacity of existing centers to support activities in pilot project sites. An additional option might be to establish a regional centre, altough UNIDO emphasizes the need to adopt and adjust to local conditions.

PART IV: Monitoring and Evaluation


The M&E is described in detail in PART II, chapter 5.2 of the attached PDF B proposal, ANNEX A Project Proposal En.doc



PART V: Legal Context


This Project Document shall be the instrument referred to as such in Article I of the Standard Basic Assistance Agreement between the Governments of Belarus, Russian Federation, Ukraine and the United Nations Development Programme. The host country implementing agency shall, for the purpose of the Standard Basic Assistance Agreement, refer to the government co-operating agency described in that Agreement.


UNDP acts in this Project as Implementing Agency of the Global Environment Facility (GEF), and all rights and privileges pertaining to UNDP as per the terms of the SBAA shall be extended mutatis mutandis to GEF.


The UNDP Principal Project Resident Representative in Ukraine is authorized to effect in writing the following types of revision to this Project Document, provided that he/she has verified the agreement thereto by the UNDP-GEF Unit and is assured that the other signatories to the Project Document have no objection to the proposed changes:


  1. Revision of, or addition to, any of the annexes to the Project Document;


  1. Revisions which do not involve significant changes in the immediate objectives, outputs or activities of the project, but are caused by the rearrangement of the inputs already agreed to or by cost increases due to inflation;


  1. Mandatory annual revisions which re-phase the delivery of agreed project inputs or increased expert or other costs due to inflation or take into account agency expenditure flexibility; and


  1. Inclusion of additional annexes and attachments only as set out here in this Project Document

SECTION II: STRATEGIC RESULTS FRAMEWORK


Table 1: Indicative Outputs, Activities and quarterly workplan


See ANNEX A Project Proposal En.doc


SECTION III: TOTAL BUDGET AND WORKPLAN

Award ID:

Award title:PIMS 3246 IW PDF B: Dnipro Basin SAP priorities: Pollution Reduction and Institutional Arrangement 

Project ID:

Project title: PIMS 3246 IW PDF B: Dnipro Basin SAP priorities: Pollution Reduction and Institutional Arrangement 

Executing Agency: UNOPS

GEF Outcome/Atlas Activity

Responsible Party

Source of Funds

ERP/ATLAS Budget Description/Input

Amount (USD) 2005

Amount (USD) 2006

Amount (USD) 2007

Total (USD)

Outcome 1:Identification of PIP Vodokanal and Small Industry Pretreatment Sites including Sustainable Financing Mechanisms and Regulation and Monitoring Procedures for Small Industries. Cleaner Production Centres

UNOPS

62000

71600

Travel

29,500

 

 

29,500

74500

Miscellaneous

6,500

 

 

6,500

71300

Local Consultant

24,000

 

 

24,000

74200

Communication & Audio Visual Equip.

3,000

 

 

3,000

75100

Facilities & Administration

5,040

 

 

5,040

Subtotal

 

68,040

0

0

68,040

Outcome 2: Transboundary Monitoring

UNOPS

62000

71600

Travel

5,000

 

 

5,000

71600

Travel

14,000

 

 

14,000

74200

Communication & Audio Visual Equip.

1,000

 

 

1,000

75100

Facilities & Administration

1,600

 

 

1,600

Subtotal

 

21,600

0

0

21,600

Outcome 3: Harmonisation of Legislation - Regionally and with EU Criteria

UNOPS

62000

71600

Travel

5,000

 

 

5,000

71600

Travel

14,000

 

 

14,000

74200

Communication & Audio Visual Equip.

1,000

 

 

1,000

75100

Facilities & Administration

1,600

 

 

1,600

Subtotal

 

21,600

0

0

21,600

Outcome 4: Institutional Development for SAP Implementation

UNOPS

62000

71600

Travel

 

3,000

 

3,000 

74200

Communication & Audio Visual Equip.

 

1,000

 

1,000 

75100

Facilities & Administration

 

320

0

320

Subtotal

 

 

4,320

0

4,320


Outcome 5: Project Management, FP proposal preparation and M&E

UNOPS

62000

71300

Service Contract

75,000

75,000

50,000

200,000

71200

International Consultant

 

4,000

4,000

8,000

71300

Local Consultant

14,000

19,000

7,000

40,000

71400

Contractual Services

40,500

40,500

21,000

102,000

71600

Travel

12,000

25,000

8,000

45,000

72100

Contractual Services

 

5,000

 

5,000

72400

Communication and Audio Visual

8,000

8,000

4,000

20,000

72500

Supplies

9,000

9,000

3,000

21,000

73100

Rental & Maintenance Premis

27,000

27,000

15,000

69,000

74200

Communication & Audio Visual Equip.

14,000

12,000

5,148

31,148

75100

Facilities & Administration

15,960

17,960

9,372

43,291

Subtotal

 

215,460

242,460

126,520

584,440

Grand Total

326,700

246,780

126,520

700,000



Note:











1. The GEF Outcomes should match the logical framework






2. The draft Annual Workplan (AWP) will be generated by the UNDP Country Office upon entry of the Total Budget and Workplan into Atlas and finalized - prior to signature of the project document - after a 5-day no objection review by the GEF Regional Coord

















SECTION IV: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


PART I :


PDF B proposal:

See Annex A Project Proposal En.doc


Other agreements:

Endorsement letters are included in the Annex 5 and 6 of the attached PDF B proposal (Annex A)


PART II : ORGANIGRAM OF PROJECT (OPTIONAL)



PART III : TERMS OF REFERENCES FOR KEY PROJECT STAFF AND MAIN SUB-CONTRACTS


TERMS OF REFERENCE

Project Manager


General Job Description

The Project Manager shall be responsible for the overall management of the project. He/she shall liase directly with the National Focal Points and the representatives of the GEF partners and other donors, in order to co-ordinate the annual work plan for the Project. The work plan will provide guidance on the day-to-day implementation of the current project document and on the integration of the various donor funded parallel initiatives. He/she shall be responsible for all substantive, managerial and financial reports from the Project. He/she will provide overall supervision for all staff in the Project Management Unit as well as guiding and supervising all external policy relations. The Project Manager will communicate directly with the National Project Management Offices (NPMO) and with the Chairmen of the NPMCs. The Project Manager will also liaise with other IW GEF Projects in the Black Sea Region. He/she shall consult with, and co-ordinate closely with, the Project Steering and Joint Management Committee, the Principal Project Resident Representative, senior representatives of partner agencies as well as the respective UNDP environment program officers in all three Dnipro Basin Countries.


Duties

The Project Manager will have the following specific duties:


Skills and Experience Required


Duty station: Kyiv, Ukraine


TERMS OF REFERENCE


The Deputy Project Manager - River Basin Management Expert


General Job Description

The Deputy Project Manager - River Basin Management Expert is a post reserved for a national of one of the riparian countries. The incumbent will assist the Project Manager with his duties and will receive additional training in project management in order that he can act as Project Manager during periods of absence of the post holder. He will also have specific responsibilities to act as interim technical secretary for the Dnipro Regional Council and will work closely with the three governments and representatives of oblasts and civil society for the creation of this body.


He will also provide additional expertise to the PMU for the establishment of the integrated technical services needed to support a Dnipro Basin Management Programme. He will bring technical expertise to the project based upon professional involvement in one or more established river basin management projects in other parts of the world. He will assume responsibility for organizing the PMU activities set out in the Work Plan and will coordinate the activities of working groups involved in the attainment of project outcomes. He will also maintain and coordinate the participation of national Vodokanals, Oblast administrations and other agencies participating in the project.


Duties

The Deputy Project Manager - River Basin Management Expert will have the following specific duties:


Duty station: Kyiv, Ukraine




TERMS OF REFERENCE


Projects Coordinator


General

The Projects Coordinator, under the supervision of the Project Manager, will be responsible for assisting the PMU team in attaining the Objectives set out in the PDF-B. This will involve all levels of planning and participation in project activities set out in the Project Work Plan. In addition the Projects Coordinator will maintain direct working linkages with the NGO community in the Dnipro Basin region. The Projects Coordinator will also take part in project activities concerning involvement of various stakeholder groups and with related information dissemination and training activities. She/he will liaise with corresponding activities of other donors in the field. His/her duties will also include daily administrative tasks assigned to him/her by the Project Manager associated with the overall management of the project.


Duties

The Projects Coordinator will have the following specific duties:


Requirements


Duty station: Kyiv, Ukraine


TERMS OF REFERENCE


Administrator


General

The Dnipro Basin Environment Programme is a regional UNDP – GEF project with participation from the governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. Through its coordination office in Kyiv the project is designed to develop a trans-boundary program of measures and their respective implementation mechanisms in order to sustainably protect the Dnipro River.

The project is seeking the services of an experienced Administrator who will work under the direct supervision of the Project Coordinator.

Duties

The Administrator:


Skills and Experience Required


Duty station: Kyiv, Ukraine


SIGNATURE PAGE


Countries: Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation

(Note: No UNDAF available for Belarus or Russia)



UNDAF Outcome(s)/Indicator(s): _Ukraine UNDAF currently under development

(Link to UNDAF outcome., If no UNDAF, leave blank)

Expected Outcome(s)/Indicator (s): _____________________________________

(CP outcomes linked t the SRF/MYFF goal and service line) _____________________________________


Expected Output(s)/Indicator(s): _____________________________________

(CP outcomes linked t the SRF/MYFF goal and service line) _____________________________________


Implementing partner: _______UNOPS__________________

(designated institution/Executing agency)


Other Partners: _______UNDP_______________


_________________________


Total budget: $700,000 (GEF contribution)

Allocated resources: ____________

Government $1,520,000 (committed from NAP budgets)


Programme Period:___2005-2007__________

Programme Component:_Environment__

Project Title:_Implementation of Priority Interventions of the Dnipro Basin Strategic Action Program: Chemical Industrial Pollution Reduction and The Development of Joint Institutional Arrangements

Project ID: ___PIMS 3246______________

Project Duration: _____30 months_________

Management Arrangement: _Agency Execution (UNOPS)















Name Date

Agreed by (Government of):



Ukraine_____________________________________________________________________________



Belarus______________________________________________________________________________



Russian Federation___________________________________________________________________________



Agreed by UNOPS____________________________________________________________________



Agreed by UNDP_____________________________________________________________________