INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION
FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE DANUBE RIVER
Inventory of Potential Accidental Risk Spots
in the Danube River Basin
Prepared by
the ARS-ad-hoc Expert Panel of the AEPWS EG
November 2001
Contents
Analysis of Accidental Risk Spots (ARS) in the catchment area of
the Danube
Preface
1.
Synopsis
2. Background
3.
Selection of hazardous locations
3.1
EU "Seveso II" guidelines
3.2
"UN/ECE agreement on the transboundary effects of industrial
accidents" (Industrial Accidents Convention)
3.3 The
ICPE
methodology
3.3.1
Water Risk Classes
3.3.2
Water Risk Index (WRI)
3.4
Procedures followed in the Danube catchment area
4.
Analysis and evaluation
4.1 Results
4.1.1
Germany
4.1.2 Austria
4.1.3 Czech
Republic
4.1.4 Slovak
Republic
4.1.5
Hungary
4.1.6
Slovenia
4.1.7 Croatia
4.1.8 Bulgaria
4.1.9 Romania
4.1.10 Ukraine
4.1.11
Republic of Moldova
5. Recommendations
1
Appendices
Annex 1
Seveso II Annex 1
Annex 2
UN/ECE convention Annex 1
Annex 3
WRC classification
Annex 4
Alarm criteria
Annex 5
Information-Sources
Annex 6
Difficulties - ARS
ARS Tables
ARS -
Germany
ARS -
Austria (no table received)
ARS -
Czech Republic
ARS -
Slovak Republic
ARS -
Hungary
ARS -
Slovenia
ARS -
Croatia
ARS -
Bulgaria
ARS -
Romania
ARS -
Ukraine (no table received)
ARS -
Republic of Moldova
2
ANALYSIS
OF ACCIDENTAL RISK SPOTS (ARS)
IN THE CATCHMENT AREA OF THE DANUBE
As of 30 June 2001
Prepared
by the ARS-ad-hoc Expert Panel of the AEPWS EG:
Gerhard Winkelmann-Oei
Aurel Varduca
Daniel Geisbacher
György Pinter
Igor Liska
3
Preface
As a follow-up to the cyanide spills in the Tisa river basin government representatives from
Romania, Hungary, Ukraine and Slovakia agreed at a Tetralateral Commission meeting held
in Cluj (RO) on 23-24 May, 2000, to prepare national inventories of potential accidental risk
spots (including their mapping) in the Tisa catchment area. The model adopted for the
inventory was based on the previous classification of installations posing a danger of
accidental water pollution in the Elbe catchment area.
In September 2000 The ICPDR Steering Group encouraged all ICPDR member
States/Danube Countries to elaborate national ARS inventories in order to arrive at a common
inventory for the whole Danube River Basin, based on the methodology applied for the Tisa.
The realisation of this task was entrusted to the AEPWS [Accident Emergency Prevention and
Warning System] Expert Group, who in their turn delegated a panel of experts (ad-hoc ARS
Expert Group) to carry out the analysis, which is presented here.
The basin-wide Inventory of Potential Accidental Risk Spots has been made on the basis of
information supplied by each of the ICPDR countries. Additional data have been supplied by
the ad-hoc ARS Expert Group. The analysis reflects the state of potential hazards as of 30
June 2001.
1. Synopsis
A quantitative evaluation of hazardous locations in the Danube catchment area was carried
out for the first time with reference to possible water pollution resulting from accidents. The
analysis is reflecting the potential dangers; the actual danger level can only be determined on
the basis of an analysis of the safety measures that have been put in place.
The methods used are based on the transposition of substances present that could lead to
water pollution into WRC (in German WGK) 3-equivalents (water risk classes). From the
sum of the WRC 3- equivalents a so-called WRI (water risk index) can be calculated
logarithmically, analogously to the Richter scale in the case of earthquakes. On this basis it
was possible to analyse the potential ARSs (accidental risk spots) in the Danube catchment
area and assess their relative significance.
4
The investigation discovered that about a third of the entire risk potential, in terms of WRC-3
equivalent mass, is to be found in the Danube catchment area in Germany, while about a
quarter is connected with mining activities in Romania. In addition to this, sedimentation
basins, or tailing ponds, present an enormous potential hazard. In view of the catastrophic
accidents that have happened in the past (Donana, Baia Mare, Baia Borsa, etc.), this
conclusion was to be expected.
The investigation was able to identify top-priority ARSs in the various member states of the
ICPDR, which should prompt the local authorities to take urgent safety measures in these
installations.
2. Background
The environmental disasters caused by the cyanide accident in the Tisa catchment area proved
repeatedly that inadequate precautionary measures in industrial practice, when faced with a
water pollution occasioned by accident, can lead to massively harmful effects, both for human
beings and for the environment, as well as having a significant economic impact on entire
regions.
On the initiative of the ICPDR, since 1997 an Accidental Emergency Warning System
(AEWS) in the Danube river basin is in operation. Its major task is propagation of the alarm
message on the accidental spill to mitigate the consequences of an accident. Preparation of an
Inventory of Potential Accidental Risk Spots is a part of a complex of measures designed to
support the AEWS and represents a contribution to fulfilment of the goals set out in the
"ICPDR Joint Action Programme" for 2001 to 2005.
The selection of the installations was made on the basis of the potential danger they represent,
based on the nature and the quantity of the raw materials handled in these installations that
could cause water pollution. In this context it must be made clear that a definitive statement of
the actual danger level was not possible on the basis of these findings only, since no
investigation has been made of the safety measures that have been put in place in each of
these locations. An evaluation of the quality of prevention, or of the safety rating of the
factories concerned, is not the object of this analysis, even though suggestions are proposed as
to what steps could be taken to make progressive improvements in the safety level (see
attachment: "Checklist-methodology").
5
The philosophy of water protection, as seen in relation to industrial installations in the
developed industrial countries is based on presumption that the potential hazard to water
bodies can be compensated by comprehensive technological and organisational safety
precautions.
The analysis executed here gives an overview of the potential dimensions of the hazard,
showing at what points action needs to be taken, that is, which aspects of the safety of an
installation need to be referred to as a matter of top priority.
3.
Selection of hazardous locations
Because systems for classifying accident-susceptible industrial activities in the various
countries of the Danube catchment area are quite different from one another, if they even exist
at all, the first task was to find a common procedure to be used for the classification.
As a basis for this
· the EU "Seveso II" directive,
· the "UN/ECE agreement on the transboundary effects of industrial accidents" (Industrial
Accidents Convention) as well as
· the findings of the International Commission for the Protection of the River Elbe (ICPE)
were taken into consideration.
The first criterion for selection in all cases was the quantity of dangerous substances present
at each of the various locations. In particular, the international directives mentioned above
make the following implications:
3.1 EU "Seveso II" directive
This directive defines hazardous industrial activity on the basis of the quantity of
dangerous substances present at the given location. The level of hazard that a substance
represents is based on danger categories as well as on a list of individual substances
(see Annex, Seveso II). No discrimination is made here in respect of potential hazards
to water, air, or the soil.
6
3.2 "UN/ECE agreement on the transboundary effects of industrial accidents"
(Industrial Accidents Convention)
The definition of hazardous industrial activities is in all essential respects analogous to
the definition found in the EU "Seveso II" directive. Only in the quantities of the substances
that are taken to be critical are there some small differences, which are however at present
being harmonized. The convention itself still makes no difference between accidents that
transmit their effects by way of water, the air, and the soil. At the first Conference of the
Parties to the Industrial Convention, however, a resolution was adopted that included
specified criteria for the classification of hazardous installations on river systems extending
across national boundaries. In this method of classification, industrial activities with potential
for water pollution are assessed in terms of the various substance categories 3, 4, 5, and 8
("very poisonous", "poisonous", "oxidising", and "environmentally dangerous") along with
the critical thresholds for the quantities involved (see Annex, UN/ECE criteria).
3.3 The ICPE methodology
As early as 1995 a method was developed within the ICPE for categorising those
industrial activities in the Elbe river basin that represent a hazard of water pollution. The basis
of this was the framework for determining the assessment of water pollution caused by
accident that had been worked out by the Elbe Warning and Alarm Plan. The critical factors
here were the potential for causing water pollution combined with the quantity of hazardous
substances present in each case. These considerations gave the so-called water risk index
(WRI). In the year 2001 this methodology has been also established by the ICPDR (see
Annex "Alarmcriteria")
3.3.1 Water Risk Classes
Water risk classes have already been used in Germany for more than 20 years as a
means of assessing "substance-specific water hazards", particularly in determining the
potential for water pollution represented by hazardous installations.
By now about 6000 substances and mixtures of substances have been classified in
these terms.
- The following properties of substances are the essential factors that are taken into
account when classifying in terms of Water Risk Classes (WRC):Toxicity (acute,
chronic)
- Toxicity to humans and mammals
7
- Aquatic
toxicity
- Persistence
- Biological
degradability
- Physiochemical
eliminability
- Properties of distribution in water and the soil
- In the organism (accumulation)
In detail the water risk class is determined by assessing the effects of substances that
are categorised in terms of the 25 R-ratings. The difference is made between
substances posing no danger (WRC 0) and those ranked into three classes of danger:
WRC 1: low danger to water
WRC 2: dangerous to water
WRC 3: high danger to water
Contrary to both the EU "Seveso II" directive and the UN/ECE "Industrial
Convention", the water hazard classes are an integrated method of evaluating water
hazards (see Annex, WRC classification).
3.3.2 Water Risk Index (WRI)
Substance-specific determination of water hazard makes distinctions between the
separate water hazard classes based on the factors 10 100. For a simplified
assessment of potential water hazard in industrial activities, the International Warning
and Alarm Plan Elbe (IWAE) was the context for the development of the so-called
index of water pollution. Here in the assessment of water pollution caused by an
accident a water risk index (WRI) was introduced, which, like the Richter scale in the
case of earthquakes, makes it possible to classify water-related accidents according to
their potential danger. The WRI corresponds to the base 10 logarithm of the WRC 3
substance equivalents.
For categorising dangerous activities in the Elbe catchment area the above mentioned
principles were referred to. In addition the following secondary criteria were
introduced:
1. For the sake of determining which activities carried the highest risk potential, a
cut-off threshold of WRI >= 5 was introduced.
8
2. Only those activities were investigated that are located directly on the Elbe, or up
to 50 kilometres upstream on its tributaries.
3.4 Procedures followed in the Danube catchment area
On the basis of an analysis of the various approaches described above, the ICPE's way
of proceeding was found to be the most suitable for the analysis of industrial activities with
high potential for causing water pollution. An analysis just in terms of the EU "Seveso II"
directive would have selected installations susceptible to accident without discriminating on
the basis of their potential for causing water pollution. The UN/ECE "Industrial Convention"
would have taken the water hazard more into account, but a weighting of the various activities
in terms of hazard potential would not have been possible.
The ICPE's way of proceeding embodied a pragmatic approach, making possible a
rapid determination of the most hazardous activities and, on that basis, a recommendation of
safety measures that should be given the highest priority.
Because the substance classifications of the water hazard classes incorporate the
substance criteria of the EU "Seveso II" directive as well as those of the UN/ECE-"Industrial
Convention", while at the same time going beyond them, we can be assured that all industrial
installations that are referred to on the basis of these two principles will also be selected using
the ICPE method. Activities presenting a water hazard in terms of the EU "Seveso II"
directive or in terms of the UN/ECE "Industrial Convention" would therefore be a subclass of
the activities determined by the ICPE approach.
Only reservation no. 2 of the ICPE methodology, having in view the UN/ECE
"Industrial Convention", has not been taken into account. Following example will explain the
approach applied:
As the first step the inventory of chemicals (type and amount) in each site will be performed.
The to each substance the WRC is ascribed. For this purpose the UBA databank of dangerous
chemicals can be used (http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/wgs/wgs-index.htm). If no WRC
can be found for a particular substance then the expert estimate must be done (e.g., content of
the sedimentation reservoir has WRC 1). For the determination of the water endangering
potential of the assessed site the calculation of the WRI is necessary. WRI is calculated from
the amounts of all dangerous substances after their recalculation to WRC 3 equivalent1 . The
example of the recalculation is given in the following Table:
1 The real differences in danger to water between particular WRC-classes are in the interval of 10-100. To
simplify the classification using WRC the factor of danger between classes has been set to 10. This leads to a
certain overestimation of danger of WRC 1 substances and to underestimation of danger of WRC 3 substances.
This approach can be justified by the fact that during accidents in addition to toxic effects also other adverse
9
Table 1
Substance Amount
WRC WRC
3
WRI
equivalent
[Kg]
[Kg]
Paraffine 10000
"0"
10
1
NaOH 10000
1 100
2
Ammonia 10000
2 1000
3
Acrylnitril 10000
3 10000
4
Sum
11110
4,046
From this example it is clear that substances posing low danger to water have negligible effect to total WRI
in case that comparable amounts of various substances have been spilled.
4. Analysis and evaluation
In October 2000 the members states of the ICPDR were requested to compile a basin-wide
Inventory of Potential Accidental Risk Spots based on the accepted methodology (see Annex,
Survey Table). The survey was focussed to the place and name of the activity, along with the
presence of substances capable of causing water pollution and their quantity. In addition, in
the interests of cartographical precision the co-ordinates of the place were to be supplied.
The data resulting from the enquiry received by the end of June 2001 was of variable quality
(see Annex ,,Information Sources"). No information was received from Austria, Ukraine and
Bosna i Herzegovina. Although the Inventory consisted of very few columns to be filled in, it
was obvious that some countries had found it very difficult to respond to the questions. In
order to analyse these difficulties and to draw the appropriate conclusions, all member states
of the ICPDR were asked to make a statement. The result is summarised in the Annex,
Difficulties NATIONAL A.R.S. INVENTORY.
On the basis of a technical analysis of the results of the questionnaire, the following could be
established as principal difficulties:
· Geographical co-ordinates are evidently known only in some countries.
impacts can occur (e.g., decrease of oxygen content). These effects are relevant especially during spills of large
amounts of dangerous substances.
10
· For complex mixtures of substances there have often been no reliable R-phrases or
water risk indices established. So in the analysis a number of water risk indices were
estimated (for example with water-polluting solvents in tailing ponds à WRC=1).
· The total quantity of the hazardous substances can often be only an estimate.
· A major difficulty consists in the question of how an `industrial activity' is to be
defined. Are pipelines or refuse depots to be included into this category? Seeing that
immediately following on the Seveso II directive the question has been raised whether
the cyanide accident in the Tisa catchment area falls within the scope of the directive,
in carrying out this survey an open mind was maintained on this issue, and the various
ICPDR countries were offered the latitude of forming a definition of activities
representing a water hazard in the light of their own experience. This way of
proceeding resulted in some spectacular results, e.g. with reference to the potential
risk of tailing ponds by comparison with "conventional" industrial activities.
In detail the survey produced the following results:
4.1 Results
The following table (Table 1) gives a comprehensive overview of the results obtained.
Altogether data was determined for 611 ARSs (potential "accidental risk spots"). The
total quantity of highly water-hazardous (WRC3) substances in the Danube catchment
area is approx. 6 million tonnes. Over a third of this is used in industrial activities in
Germany. In addition some 25% of this hazard potential is associated with mining
activities (tailing ponds) in Romania. The lowest WRI (Water Risk Index) figures are
found in Slovenia and the Republic of Moldova. Seeing that the WRI works on a
logarithmic scale, the difference in substance-specific hazard potential between Hungary
(WRI = 8.8), say, and Bulgaria (WRI = 8.6) practically represents a doubling in quantity.
Therefore, the logarithmic scaling is always to be kept in mind when comparing any WRI
values. The numerical difference of 1 in WRI means the difference in an order of
magnitude in terms of mass.
All in all the distribution resulting from the survey, when compared with the economic
capacity or industrial development of the various regions, is in accordance with what
might have been expected. Only the high WRI for Romania is at first glance not easy to
make sense of. The detailed analysis of the various countries gives a somewhat fuller
picture.
11
Table 2
The number of ARSs and their total hazard potential
Reported Evaluable
Total quantity
Country
ARS
ARS
Total WRI
(WRC 3 Equivalents)
[Kg]
Bulgaria
29
28
370,000,000
8.6
Germany
56
56
2,293,874,000
9.4
Croatia
30
26
135,734,760
8.1
Moldova
27
14
3,634,610
6.6
Romania
67
59
2,076,893,274
9.3
Slowak. Rep.
148
145
250,877,521
8.4
Slovenia
2
2
980,000
6.0
Czech Rep.
9
8
144,617,790
8.2
Hungary
243
242
706,603,002
8.8
Total
611
580
5,982,720,034
9.8
In view of the statistical distribution of the various ARSs in terms of WRI classes in the
various countries, it can be clearly seen that the survey methods applied here succeeded in
defining the top end of the high-risk locations in the Danube catchment area. As a rule, the
number of ARSs should progressively rise as the WRI becomes lower (see Hungary); where
this is not the case, and intermediate peaks come into view, this indicates certain specific
factors peculiar to the country, such as a higher proportion of mining activities or refuse
depots.
Table 3
Statistical distribution of the ARSs in terms of WRI classes
Total
Number of ARS spots belonging to the
Danube
Number of
Water Risk Index groups
Countries
Evaluable
ARS spots
9.0
8.9 8.0
7.9 7.0
6.9 6.0
5.9 5.0
Below 5
Germany
56
-
6
6
14
29
1
Austria
Czech Rep.
8
-
1
1
-
1
5
Slovakia
145
-
-
9
17
62
57
Hungary
242
-
2
11
20
40
169
Slovenia
2
-
-
-
-
2
-
Croatia
26
-
-
3
10
2
11
12
Romania
59
-
8
11
12
7
21
Bulgaria
28
-
1
2
7
5
13
Moldova
14
-
-
-
1
7
6
Ukraine
In conclusion it must again be emphasised that the present determination of potential risk does
not correspond to the actual risk, since for the real risk assessment the security measures
applied must be taken into consideration, as well. In the course of the economic recovery of
Middle and Eastern Europe, a considerable rise in the number of ARSs is to be expected. To
prevent this development's leading to a rise in the Danube catchment area in the actual hazard
of water pollution occasioned by accident, effective prescriptions for technical safety
measures, both at national and at supranational level, are needed, and steps must be taken to
ensure that they are realised in practice.
4.1.1 Germany
The German national inventory was carried out on the basis of the ICPE procedures,
i.e., only industrial installations situated by the tributaries up to 50 kilometres
upstream their confluence with the Danube mainstream were taken into consideration.
As a result a number of industrial installations were not included (e.g. Munich).
Inclusion of these regions would probably result in much higher WRI value.
Altogether 56 activities representing a water hazard were reported. These could be
completely incorporated in the survey. The highest potential hazards are located to be
in oil refineries and depots.
4.1.2 Austria
From Austria no information has been received by the end of June 2001.
4.1.3 Czech Republic
The Czech Republic reported 9 ARSs, although one of these could not be evaluated as
the data supplied was incomplete. Out of the remaining 8 ARSs, 7 are associated with
"industrial" activities and 1 ARS corresponds to two tailing ponds resulting from the
processing of uranium. The results of the survey pointed at two interesting facts:
1. The potential hazard of uranium tailing ponds, even at a conservative estimate, is
higher by a factor of 10 than all other "industrial" potential hazards in the Czech
Republic.
13
2. Practically the whole potential "industrial" hazard (>99%) is produced by one
ARS related to the processing of crude oil.
4.1.4. Slovak Republic
The report made by the Slovak Republic was also very comprehensive. Altogether 148
ARS were reported, out of which 145 could be assessed. The high number of
installations arises from the fact that a lot of ARS with low hazard potential were
reported. Having in mind that the WRI is logarithmically determined the contribution
of these ARS to the overall WRI rating is negligible. A more significant influence here
might have been derived from the conservative procedures of handling of
petrochemical products belonging to WRC 3.
The highest hazard potential in the Slovak inventory was found in connection with a
tailing pond ("siderite mining") and then that of refineries/depots for the processing or
storing of petrochemical products.
4.1.5 Hungary
Hungary provided a very detailed and precise report; although, as already observed in
the case of Germany, the survey considered tributaries up to a distance of only 50
kilometres above their confluence into the Danube. Altogether 246 ARSs were
reported. This inventory included more ARSs than it was required by the WRI cut-off
point having the value of 5. So the Hungarian report contains 173 ARS, which have a
WRI less than 5, thus, they should be considered as relatively low-risk locations. As
an additional interesting fact in the Hungarian national inventory the different
hazardous potential of agricultural and industrial activities in the Tisa and the Danube
catchment can be considered. It was found that the agricultural ARSs (U-Agri-D and
U-Agri-T) have only a negligible influence on the overall Risk Index. The highest
hazard potential is connected with the industrial activities on the Tisa (see Table 2).
The highest potential hazards are found in two ARSs in the Tisa catchment (an oil-
fired power station and a chemical factory).
14
Table 4
Total quantity
ARS
[Kg]
WRI
Mean/ARS Mean WRI
Hungary
Total
243
706,603,002
8.8
3617345
6.6
U-Agri-D
30
2,910,000
6.5
100345
5.0
U-Agri-T
20
1,928,000
6.3
101474
5.0
U-Industry-D
131
163,766,892
8.2
1259745
6.1
U-Industry-T
62
537,998,110
8.7
8406220
6.9
4.1.6 Slovenia
Slovenia reported two ARSs. Both are refuse depots ("land fill sites") arising from the
metalworking and petrochemical industries.
4.1.7 Croatia
Out of 30 ARSs reported, data were supplied for 26. The highest potential hazard is
connected with a pond of waste water.
4.1.8 Bulgaria
Out of 29 reported ARS, 28 could be evaluated in terms of WRC and on the basis of
the quantities present by means of expert estimates. The Kremikovtzi industrial site
had the highest hazard potential prevailing over all other risk spots.
It is particularly evident from the Bulgarian inventory that, in spite of the sufficient
instructions provided to a local expert for carrying out of the survey, there is still a
considerable need for consultation to enhance the understanding of the approach
applied.
4.1.9 Romania
67 ARSs were reported by Romania. The available data were sufficient for the
evaluation of 59 installations. After Germany, Romania has the second highest overall
WRI. The Inventory shows the reasons for this phenomenon. The "industrial" hazard
15
potential of Romania represents less than 0.1% of the enormously high hazard
potential of tailing ponds and wastewater dumps arising from a wide range of mining
activities.
4.1.10 Ukraine
The Ukraine did not participate in the ARS survey.
4.1.11 Republic of Moldova
The Republic of Moldova reported 27 ARSs. More than the half of these (about 14)
could be evaluated on the basis of simplified criteria. The Republic of Moldova is a
predominantly an agricultural country with relatively limited industrial activities.
Accordingly, the hazard potential is to be found almost exclusively in fuel depots and
large-scale chlorine depots connected with water treatment or food production.
5. Recommendations
· On the basis of the survey procedures applied, the most significant potential hazards in
the Danube catchment area could be determined. It is recommended to the ICPDR
member states that they should carefully control and monitor locations with a high-
risk potential, with special reference to weak points.
· It is recommended to the ICPDR member states that, using the agreed procedures,
they should ensure the continuous updating of ARS Inventory with the aim to further
investigate the distribution of potential hazards in their region. This should lead to
specification of high priority actions to be taken.
· The ARS survey can only give an indication of potential hazards. The actual risks
arising from the ARSs depend on the safety measures that have been applied in each
installation. In order to estimate the real safety level that has been attained, and to
improve it if necessary, special checklists have been developed (see Appendix), based
on the recommendations of the ICPR and of the ICPE. These checklists should be
used by the authorities of the ICPDR member states in order to investigate the safety
measures in each ARS. These checklists should be seen as "living documents" and
should be further adjusted to the need of the ICPDR-countries by the AEPWS expert
group.
· The practical value of these checklists has been positively proved in the context of a
support project donated by the German federal government to Romania and to the
16
Republic of Moldova. Therefore, the practical value of the checklists should be
demonstrated to all ICPDR member states.
· Tailing ponds arising from mining activities and waste depots or dumps were found to
be the ARSs with the highest hazard potential. These areas are covered only partially
or not at all by international regulations (EU directives; UN/ECE conventions). The
ICPDR should address recommendations to the EU and the UN/ECE urging them to
provide appropriate regulations setting the safety standards for these high-risk
locations.
· In addition to this, it is recommended that the ICPDR member states should assess
their national legislation as for its efficiency to ensure a good technical status of the
hazardous installations avoiding any weaknesses in their safety design.
· It is also recommended that the ICPDR member states should evaluate the personal
and technical qualifications of their bodies responsible for mapping of hazards related
to ARSs.
· The present analysis represents the first international survey of ARSs in the Danube
River Basin. The survey procedures should be further refined and standardised to
indicate the actions to be taken. It is therefore recommended that the ICPDR should
continue to refine and standardise the survey methodologies, and should repeat the
Inventory of ARSs in the Danube River Basin at three-year intervals.
17
Annex 1
Seveso II
18
ANNEX 1 SEVESO 2
APPLICATION OF THE DIRECTIVE
INTRODUCTION
1. This Annex applies to the presence of dangerous substances at any establishment within the meaning
of Article 3 of this Directive and determines the application of the relevant Articles thereof.
2. Mixtures and preparations shall be treated in the same way as pure substances provided they remain
within concentration limits set according to their properties under the relevant Directives given in Part
2, Note 1, or their latest adaptation to technical progress, unless a percentage composition or other
description is specifically given.
3. The qualifying quantities set out below relate to each establishment.
4. The quantities to be considered for the application of the relevant Articles are the maximum
quantities which are present or are likely to be present at any one time. Dangerous substances present at
an establishment only in quantities equal to or less than 2 % of the relevant qualifying quantity shall be
ignored for the purposes of calculating the total quantity present if their location within an
establishment is such that it cannot act as an initiator of a major accident elsewhere on the site.
5. The rules given in Part 2, Note 4 governing the addition of dangerous substances, or categories of
dangerous substances, shall apply where appropriate.
PART 1
Named substances
Where a substance or group of substances listed in Part 1 also falls within a category of Part 2, the
qualifying quantities set out in Part 1 must be used.
>TABLE POSITION>
NOTES
1. Ammonium nitrate (350/2 500)
This applies to ammonium nitrate and ammonium nitrate compounds in which the nitrogen content as a
result of the ammonium nitrate is more than 28 % by weight (compounds other than those referred to in
Note 2) and to aqueous ammonium nitrate solutions in which the concentration of ammonium nitrate is
more than 90 % by weight.
2. Ammonium nitrate (1 250/5 000)
This applies to simple ammonium-nitrate based fertilizers which comply with Directive 80/876/EEC
and to composite fertilizers in which the nitrogen content as a result of the ammonium nitrate is more
than 28 % in weight (a composite fertilizer contains ammonium nitrate with phosphate and/or potash).
1. Polychlorodibenzofurans and polychlorodibenzodioxins
The quantities of polychlorodibenzofurans and polychlorodibenzodioxins are calculated using the
following factors:
>TABLE POSITION>
PART 2
Categories of substances and preparations not specifically named in Part 1
>TABLE POSITION>
NOTES
1. Substances and preparations are classified according to the following Directives (as amended) and
their current adaptation to technical progress:
- Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances
(1),
- Council Directive 88/379/EEC of 7 June 1988 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of
dangerous preparations (2),
- Council Directive 78/631/EEC of 26 June 1978 on the approximation of the laws of the Member
States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations (pesticides) (3).
In the case of substances and preparations which are not classified as dangerous according to any of the
above Directives but which nevertheless are present, or are likely to be present, in an establishment and
which possess or are likely to possess, under the conditions found at the establishment, equivalent
properties in terms of major-accident potential, the procedures for provisional classification shall be
19
followed according to the relevant Article of the appropriate Directive.
In the case of substances and preparations with properties giving rise to more than one classification,
for the purposes of this Directive the lowest thresholds shall apply.
For the purposes of this Directive, a list providing information on substances and preparations shall be
established, kept up to date and approved by the procedure set up under Article 22.
2. An 'explosive` means:
(a) (i) a substance or preparation which creates the risk of an explosion by shock, friction, fire or other
sources of ignition (risk phrase R 2),
(ii) a pyrotechnic substance is a substance (or mixture of substances) designated to produce heat, light,
sound, gas or smoke or a combination of such effects through non-detonating self-sustained exothermic
chemical reactions, or
(iii) an explosive or pyrotechnic substance or preparation contained in objects;
(b) a substance or preparation which creates extreme risks of explosion by shock, friction, fire or other
sources of ignition (risk phrase R 3).
3. 'Flammable`, 'highly flammable`, and 'extremely flammable` in categories 6, 7 and 8 mean:
(a) flammable liquids:
substances and preparations having a flash point equal to or greater than 21 °C and less than or equal to
55 °C (risk phrase R 10), supporting combustion;
(b) highly flammable liquids:
1. - substances and preparations which may become hot and finally catch fire in contact with air at
ambient temperature without any input of energy (risk phrase R 17),
- substances which have a flash point lower than 55 °C and which remain liquid under pressure, where
particular processing conditions, such as high pressure or high temperature, may create major-accident
hazards;
2. substances and preparations having a flash point lower than 21 °C and which are not extremely
flammable (risk phrase R 11, second indent);
(c) extremely flammable gases and liquids:
1. liquid substances and preparations which have a flash point lower than 0 °C and the boiling point (or,
in the case of a boiling range, the initial boiling point) of which at normal pressure is less than or equal
to 35 °C (risk phrase R 12, first indent), and
2. gaseous substances and preparations which are flammable in contact with air at ambient temperature
and pressure (risk phrase R 12, second indent), whether or not kept in the gaseous or liquid state under
pressure, excluding liquefied extremely flammable gases (including LPG) and natural gas referred to in
Part 1, and
3. liquid substances and preparations maintained at a temperature above their boiling point.
4. The addition of dangerous substances to determine the quantity present at an establishment shall be
carried out according to the following rule:
if the sum
>NUM>q1
>DEN>Q
+ >NUM>q2
>DEN>Q
+ >NUM>q3
>DEN>Q
+ >NUM>q4
>DEN>Q
+ >NUM>q5
>DEN>Q
+ . . . > 1where qx = the quantity of dangerous substances x (or category of dangerous substances)
falling within Parts 1 or 2 of this Annex,
Q = the relevant threshold quantity from Parts 1 or 2,
then the establishment is covered by the relevant requirements of this Directive.
This rule will apply for the following circumstances:
(a) for substances and preparations appearing in Part 1 at quantities less than their individual qualifying
quantity present with substances having the same classification from Part 2, and the addition of
substances and preparations with the same classification from Part 2;
(b) for the addition of categories 1, 2 and 9 present at an establishment together;
(c) for the addition of categories 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 a, 7 b and 8, present at an establishment together.
(1) OJ No 196, 16. 8. 1967, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 93/105/EC (OJ No L 294, 30.
20
11. 1993, p. 21).
(2) OJ No L 187, 16. 7. 1988, p. 14.
(3) OJ No L 206, 29. 7. 1978, p. 13. Directive as last amended by Directive 92/32/EEC (OJ No L 154,
5. 6. 1992, p. 1).
21
Annex 2
UN/ECE convention Annex 1
22
ANNEX 2 UN/ECE Convention on Transboundary accidents, Annex 1
GUIDELINES TO FACILITATE THE IDENTIFICATION OF
HAZARDOUS ACTIVITIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE CONVENTION
(in accordance with article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention)
1. According to the definitions of the Convention, hazardous activities are activities
capable of causing transboundary effects that involve the manufacture, use, storage, handling or
disposal of hazardous substances in quantities above the threshold limits laid down in annex I to the
Convention.
2. A transboundary effect means a serious effect in one Party as a result of an industrial
accident occurring in another Party. An effect is a direct or indirect, immediate or delayed adverse
consequence caused by an industrial accident on, inter alia, human beings, soil, water, air,
landscape, material assets or cultural heritage.
3. Taking into account the definition of hazardous activity and the fact that industrial
accidents with transboundary effects are more likely to occur in activities close to a border or in a
river basin having a transboundary outlet, it is clear that both substance and quantity criteria and
location criteria are needed for the purpose of identifying hazardous activities. These criteria are
given below. They are intentionally kept pragmatic so that the Parties can start implementing the
Convention swiftly.
Substance and quantity criteria
4. The following substance and quantity criteria shall apply for the
purpose of identifying hazardous activities capable of causing transboundary
effects under the Convention: one or more hazardous substances are present or may
be present in quantities at or in excess of the threshold quantities listed in annex I
to the Convention.1/
Location criteria
5. The following two location criteria shall apply for the purpose of identifying
hazardous activities capable of causing transboundary effects under the Convention:
(a) Within 15 kilometres from the border, for activities involving
substances that may cause a fire or explosion or involving toxic substances that
may be released into the air in the event of an accident;
(b) Along or within the catchment areas of transboundary and border
rivers, transboundary or international lakes, or within the catchment areas of
transboundary groundwaters, 2/ for activities involving substances falling under
category 3, 4, 5 or 8 of part I of annex I to the Convention. A catchment area of a
transboundary river or lake is defined as the whole drainage area of this river or
lake with a common outlet.
Notes
1/ According to Council Decision 98/685/EC of 23 March 1998, for EU
member States all establishments covered by article 9 of Council Directive
96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 (Seveso II), i.e. upper-tier establishments, are taken
to meet these criteria.
23
2/ A list of major transboundary watercourses (i.e. any surface waters or groundwaters
which mark, cross or are located on boundaries between one or more States) and international lakes
has been compiled within the framework of the UN/ECE Convention on the Protection and Use of
Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes on the basis of information provided by
Parties and other UN/ECE member countries. The term "major" implies that there may be a
significant transboundary impact through these waters. It was, however, left to the discretion of the
countries to decide which of these waters were considered to fulfil the condition of "significant
transboundary impact". Thus, the list includes not only big, but also medium and small
watercourses. This list will soon be available through the Internet at the following address:
www.unece.org/env/water and will be updated regularly.
ANNEX I
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES FOR THE PURPOSES OF EFINING
HAZARDOUS ACTIVITIES
The quantities set out below relate to each activity or group of activities. Where a
range of quantities is given in Part I, the threshold quantities are the maximum
quantities given in each range. Five years after the entry into force of this
Convention, the lowest quantity given in each range shall become the threshold
quantity, unless amended.
Where a substance or preparation named in Part II also falls within a category
in Part I, the threshold quantity set out in Part II shall be used.
For the identification of hazardous activities, Parties shall take into consideration
the foreseeable possibility of aggravation of the hazards involved and the
quantities of the hazardous substances and their proximity, whether under the
charge of one or more operators.
PART I. Categories of substances and preparations not specifically named in Part II
Threshold Quantity
Category
(Tonnes)
1. Flammable gases 1a) including LPG
200
2. Highly flammable liquids 1b)
50,000
3. Very toxic 1c)
20
4. Toxic 1d)
500-200
5. Oxidizing 1e)
500-200
6. Explosive 1f)
200-50
7. Flammable liquids 1g) (handled under special conditions of
200
pressure and temperature)
8. Dangerous for the environment 1h)
200
PART II. Named substances
Substance
Threshold Quantity (Tonnes)
1. Ammonia
500
2 a Ammonium nitrate 2)
2,500
2 b Ammonium nitrate in the form of fertilizers 3)
10,000
3. Acrylonitrile
200
4. Chlorine
25
5. Ethylene oxide
50
24
6. Hydrogen cyanide
20
7. Hydrogen fluoride
50
8. Hydrogen sulphide
50
9. Sulphur dioxide
250
10. Sulphur trioxide
75
11. Lead alkyls
50
12. Phosgene
0.75
13. Methyl isocyanate
0.15
NOTES
1. Indicative criteria. In the absence of other appropriate criteria, Parties may
use the following criteria when classifying substances or preparations for the
purposes of Part I of this Annex.
(a) FLAMMABLE GASES: substances which in the gaseous state at normal
pressure and mixed with air become flammable and the boiling point of which at
normal pressure is 20'C or below;
(b) HIGHLY FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS: substances which have a flash point
lower than 21'C and the boiling point of which at normal pressure is above 20'C;
(c) VERY TOXIC: substances with properties corresponding to those in table 1
or table 2 below, and which, owing to their physical and chemical properties, are
capable of creating industrial accident hazards.
TABLE 1
LD50(oral)(1)
LD50(dermal)(2)
LC50(3)
mg/kg body weight mg/kg body weight mg/l (inhalation)
LD50 <= 25
LD50 <= 50
LC50 <= 0.5
(1) LD50 oral in rats
(2) LD50 dermal in rats or rabbits
(3) LC50 by inhalation (four hours) in rats
TABLE 2
Discriminating dose
mg/kg body weight
< 5
where the acute oral toxicity in animals of the substance has been determined
using the fixed-dose procedure.
(d) TOXIC: substances with properties corresponding to those in table 3 or 4
and having physical and chemical properties capable of creating industrial
accident hazards.
TABLE 3
LD50(oral)(1)
LD50(dermal)(2)
LC50(3)
mg/kg body weight mg/kg body weight mg/l(inhalation)
25 < LD50 <= 200 50 < LD50 <= 400 0.5 < LC50 <= 2
(1) LD50 oral in rats
25
(2) LD50 dermal in rats or rabbits
(3) LC50 by inhalation (four hours) in rats
TABLE 4
Discriminating dose
mg/kg body weight
=5
where the acute oral toxicity in animals of the substance has been determined
using the fixed-dose procedure.
(e) OXIDIZING: substances which give rise to highly exothermic reaction when
in contact with other substances, particularly flammable substances.
(f) EXPLOSIVE: substances which may explode under the effect of flame or
which are more sensitive to shocks or friction than dinitrobenzene.
(g) FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS: substances which have a flash point lower than
55oC and which remain liquid under pressure, where particular processing
conditions, such as high pressure and high temperature, may create industrial
accident hazards.
(h) DANGEROUS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: substances showing the values
for acute toxicity to the aquatic environment corresponding to table 5.
TABLE 5
LC50(1)
EC50(2)
C50(3)
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
LC50 <= 10
EC50 <= 10
IC50 <= 10
(1) LC50 fish (96 hours)
2) EC50 daphnia (48 hours)
(3) IC50 algae (72 hours)
where the substance is not readily degradable, or the log Pow > 3.0 (unless the
experimentally determined BCF < 100).
(i) LD - lethal dose
(j) LC - lethal concentration
(k) EC - effective concentration
(l) IC - inhibiting concentration
(m) Pow - partition coefficient octanol/water
(n) BCF - bioconcentration factor
2. This applies to ammonium nitrate and mixtures of ammonium nitrate where
the nitrogen content derived from the ammonium nitrate is > 28% by weight,
and to aqueous solutions of ammonium nitrate where the concentration of
ammonium nitrate is > 90% by weight.
3. This applies to straight ammonium nitrate fertilizers and to compound
fertilizers where the nitrogen content derived from the ammonium nitrate is
26
>`28% by weight (a compound fertilizer contains ammonium nitrate together
with phosphate and/or potash).
4. Mixtures and preparations containing such substances shall be treated in the
same way as the pure substance unless they no longer exhibit equivalent
properties and are not capable of producing transboundary effects.
27
Annex 3
WRC classification
28
ANNEX 3 WRC Classification
Federal Environmental Agency
August 1999
Classification of Substances and Mixtures into Water Hazard Classes
according to the Administrative Regulation
on the Classification of Substances Hazardous to Waters
(Verwaltungsvorschrift wassergefährdende Stoffe; VwVwS) of 17 May, 1999
- Guidelines for self-classification -
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. General procedures for the determination of water hazard classes
3. Classification on the basis of R-phrases according to VwVwS Annex 3
3.1 The basic data set
3.2 Other characteristics for hazard assessment
3.3 Determination of R-phrase classifications
3.4 Allocation of evaluation points and default values
3.5 Derivation of water hazard classes
3.6 Documentation of the classification
3.7 Substances non-hazardous to waters
4. Special cases
4.1 Discordant classifications of the same substance
4.2 Reclassification of substances named in VwVwS Annex 2
4.3 Classification of groups, and classification based on analogies
4.4 Classification by procedures other than those in VwVwS Annex 3
5. Classification of mixtures
5.1 Classification based on the water hazard classes of the components
5.2 Classification based on test data obtained with the mixture
5.3 Documentation and publication
5.4 Deviation from the classification in Annex 4 and No. 2.2.2 of VwVwS
6. Office of Documentation and Information on Substances Hazardous to Waters
at the Federal Environmental Agency (addresses, publications, inquiries)
Annex 1: Test procedures for determination of the basic data set
Annex 2: Allocation of evaluation points for R-phrases, and of default values
Annex 3: Documentation form for WGK classifications
Annex 4: Examples of evaluations
29
1. Introduction
An amended version of the Administrative Regulation on Substances Hazardous to Waters
(Verwaltungsvorschrift wassergefährdende Stoffe; VwVwS) was published on 17 May, 1999, and
entered into force as of 1 June, 1999, creating a new basis for the classification of substances into water
hazard classes (Wassergefährdungsklassen; WGK) in Germany. In the past, substances were classified
on the basis of an evaluation scheme published in 1979 and the classifications were published in
VwVwS. This evaluation scheme was subsequently revised according to scientific developments and
published in 1998 as a report of the Advisory Council on the Storage and Transport of Substances
Hazardous to Waters (LTwS-Schrift No. 28); adequate classification of substances into water hazard
classes was thus possible from a technical standpoint, but it did not conform to recent developments in
the classification and evaluation of substances in the context of European Law on Chemicals.
The VwVwS Amendment is therefore primarily intended to adapt WGK classifications to the Law on
Hazardous Substances. At the same time, however, it is designed to facilitate self-classification by the
industry, thus increasing its independence and responsibility. The Administrative Regulation foresees a
combination of defined WGK classifications (Annexes 1 and 2), and self-classifications (according to
the schemes in Annexes 3 and 4).
All WGK classifications of substances are registered and published by the Federal Environmental
Agency. It is therefore irrelevant with respect to legal implementation whether a classification is based
upon VwVwS Annex 1, 2, or 3. All of these classifications are equivalent with regard to their
implementation. Classifications of preparations and mixtures based on VwVwS Annex 4 are usually
not centrally registered and published. They are the sole reponsibility of the classifier.
This guideline aims at providing an overview of the procedures for self-classification into water hazard
classes. It cannot provide rules for each and every particular case. In borderline cases, the
authoritative texts are the Administrative Regulation on Substances Hazardous to Waters
(VwVwS) and the Ordinance on Hazardous Substances (and not this guideline).
Detailed and binding rules for classification are also given in a report of the Advisory Council on the
Storage and Transport of Substances Hazardous to Waters (LTwS-Schrift No. 10 of 1999), including
cases in which the VwVwS classification scheme does not apply. Classifications of this type will
continue to be the responsibility of the Commission for the Evaluation of Substances Hazardous to
Waters (whose guidelines are documented in LTwS-Schrift No. 10), and they will be published in
VwVwS Annexes 1 and 2.
30
2. General procedures for the determination of water hazard classes
With respect to the classification into water hazard classes (WGK), VwVwS discriminates between
substances (Stoffe) and mixtures (Gemische). Before the WGK can be determined, it is therefore
necessary to decide whether the compound represents a substance or a mixture (the latter term being
largely equivalent to the term preparation - Zubereitung - of the Chemicals Act). In borderline cases,
the definitions in the Chemicals Act apply. The following points may serve as a guide:
· A substance may contain impurities resulting from technical processes. These will usually not have
to be evaluated separately, as long as the tests on which the evaluation is based were conducted
with the same technical product.
· A reaction mixture not subject to further separation or processing may be considered a substance.
The same applies to substances having a complex chemical composition resulting from their
(partly) natural origin (e.g. petroleum products and fatty acid esters).
· The Chemicals Act and the Ordinance on Hazardous Substances do not apply to all substances
requiring classification into a WGK. In these cases, the R-phrases merely represent a practical
procedure for the purpose of WGK classification; they are of no consequence in other sectors of the
law.
· If a manufacturer deliberately mixes individual constitutents (which may themselves consist of
several substances), the result is a mixture.
In the classification of a substance, VwVwS discriminates between two groups:
· Substances specified in VwVwS Annexes 1 and 2, and
· all other substances (regardless of whether they are existing or new notified substances in the sense
of the Chemicals Act).
VwVwS unequivocally prescribes the priority of the classifications in Annexes 1 and 2; the water
hazard classes named in these Annexes therefore apply to the corresponding substances or
groups of substances (see Section 4.2 on the possibility of reclassification). The classification scheme
in Annex 3 only applies if a substance is not named in Annexes 1 and 2, in which case the water hazard
class is derived from R-phrases and/or default values. This procedure is explained in Section 3 of this
guideline.
The procedure for a mixture is analogous. First, it needs to be ascertained whether the mixture is
named in Annexes 1 and 2. This will usually not be the case, however, and the manufacturer will bear
the responsibility of classifying the mixture according to VwVwS Annex 4. This procedure is
explained in Section 5 of this guideline.
The rules of VwVwS Annex 4 will in general not apply to mixtures of undefined composition (e.g.
wastes). The Commission for the Evaluation of Substances Hazardous to Waters (KBwS) will classify
these mixtures on the basis of preliminary studies of their composition and their effects.
3. Classification on the basis of R-phrases according to VwVwS Annex 3
If a substance is not named in Annexes 1 and 2 of VwVwS2, then it needs to be classified by the
industry according to the provisions in VwVwS Annex 3, and the Office of Documentation and
2 All classifications - including those in VwVwS - are registered at the Office of Documentation and
Information on Substances Hazardous to Waters at the Federal Environmental Agency. It is therefore
possible to inquire whether a substance has already been classified, either in VwVwS, or by a third
party (cf. Section 6).
31
Information on Substances Hazardous to Waters at the Federal Environmental Agency must be
informed of the classification.3
The following steps are to be taken in order to derive a water hazard class:
I.
Assessment of the basic data set
II.
Assessment of other hazardous features of the substance
III.
Determination of the R-phrase classifications
IV.
Allocation of evaluation points and default values
V.
Derivation of the water hazard class (WGK)
VI.
Documentation of the classification
These steps are explained below.
3.1 The basic data set
VwVwS provides that a WGK should be assigned to a substance on the basis of at least four hazard
characteristics (the so-called "basic data set"):
· Acute oral or dermal toxicity to mammals (e.g. LD50 in rats).
· One piece of data on aquatic toxicity - fishes (acute), daphnia (acute) or algae).
· Biodegradability.
· Potential for bioaccumulation.
Additional data are required before a substance may be classified as "non-hazardous to waters" (cf.
Section 3.7).
There are two fundamental ways to establish the data of the basic data set:
a) the substance has been classified into a corresponding R-phrase in Annex 1 of Directive 67/548/EEC
("legal classification" according to the Law on Hazardous Substances),
b) corresponding studies have been conducted and are known to the classifier.
Possibility a) only provides evidence that a substance has certain hazardous characteristics (e.g. toxicity
to mammals). Because the EU does not publish whether a substance has been evaluated and determined
to be non-toxic, possibility b) applies in such cases. The classifier must therefore procure the
corresponding report. This obviously results in a duplication of effort, but it remains unavoidable as
long as the EU does not publish "negative classifications". Table 1 shows the R-phrases available for
establishing the various components of the basic data set according to possibility a).
Table 1: Establishment of basic data by R-phrase classifications in Annex 1 of Directive
67/548/EEC
Characteristic R-phrases
Acute toxicity to mammals
21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 20/21, 20/22, 20/21/22, 21/22,
(oral or dermal)
23/24, 23/25, 23/24/25, 24/25, 26/27, 26/28, 26/27/28,
27/28
Toxicity to an aquatic organism
50, 52, 53, 50/53, 51/53, 52/53
(fishes, algae or daphnia)
Biodegradability
50*, 52*, 53, 50/53, 51/53, 52/53
Potential for bioaccumulation
50*, 52*, 53, 50/53, 51/53, 52/53
* R-phrases 50 and 52 do not describe hazards concerning degradability and potential for bioaccumu-
lation. These characteristics have, however, been tested in each case prior to "legal classification", so
that an R-phrase classification into R50 or R52 permits the conclusion that no hazard exists with
respect to degradability and potential for bioaccumulation.
3 Section 4.1. describes the procedure in cases where several classifiers have classified the same
substance into different water hazard classes.
32
Example 1: A substance is "legally classified" into R22-40. In this case there is no need to determine its
acute toxicity to mammals, because this characteristic has already been evaluated by the
EU. The remaining three characteristics of the basic data set need to be investigated.
Example 2: A "legal classification" into R23/25-52/53 means that all basic data have been established.
The classifier therefore does not need to conduct any further investigations.
If the basic data set cannot, or can only partly be established by "legal classifications", the missing data
needs to be established in a study by the classifier, or by valid data from the literature (possibility b).
The recommended test procedures are given in Annex 1. It is also possible, however, to conduct
investigations by other comparable standardized test procedures.
3.2 Other characteristics for hazard assessment
The R-phrases listed in VwVwS Annex 3 (cf. Annex 2 of this guideline) also describe some
characteristics hazardous to waters that are not part of the basic data set (e.g. R-phrases on carcinogenic
and mutagenic effects).
If such R-phrases are listed in Annex 1 of EU Directive 67/548/EEC ("legal classifications") they must
be taken into account in deriving the water hazard class. When this is not the case, the manufacturer or
distributor is responsible for allocating an R-phrase according to § 4a of the Ordinance on Hazardous
Substances if the corresponding hazards are known. After this R-phrase classification according to the
Law on Hazardous Substances, evaluation points are allocated according to Annex 2.
It must be pointed out that the Ordinance on Hazardous Substances requires manufacturers and
distributors to search for any specific data available on hazardous characteristics of "their" products. As
opposed to the case of basic data (Section 3.1), however, there is no need to demonstrate that scientific
studies on other hazard characteristics have been carried out. Default values are not assigned when such
studies are lacking.
3.3 Determination of R-phrase classifications
R-phrases are allocated according to the provisions of the Ordinance on Hazardous Substances. In the
case of substances to which the provisions of the Chemicals Act and of the Ordinance on Hazardous
Substances do not apply (e.g. pharmaceuticals), R-phrases are determined by analogous procedures.
These R-phrases, however, merely represent a practical instrument to determine the water hazard class;
they are of no consequence in other sectors of the law.
Tables 2 and 3 provide an overview of the characteristics of the basic data set, and of the resulting R-
phrase classifications and WGK evaluation points. The Ordinance on Hazardous Substances and
VwVwS remain, however, the authoritative texts in borderline cases.
With respect to R-phrase classifications, it must be kept in mind that the classification always depends
on the most sensitive data item.
Table 2: Overview of R-phrases and evaluation points for acute toxicity to mammals
Exposure LD50
R-phrase Evaluation
in mg/kg body weight
points
oral
LD50 > 2000
-
0
dermal
LD50 > 2000
-
0
oral
200 < LD50 < 2000
R22
1
dermal
400 < LD50 < 2000
R21
1
oral
25 < LD50 < 200
R25
3
dermal
50 < LD50 < 400
R24
3
oral
LD50 < 25
R28
5
33
dermal
LD50 < 50
R27
5
Example: The acute oral toxicity to rats has been determined as LD50 = 1400 mg/kg. This leads to a
classification into R22 and to the allocation of one evaluation point.
Table 3: Overview of R-phrases and evaluation points for various
combinations of aquatic toxicity (fishes, algae or daphnia), biodegradability and
potential for bioaccumulation
aquatic toxicity (LC50, EC50 or IC50) in mg/l
(most sensitive organism)
Biodegradability Potential
for
bioaccumulation
> 100
10 - <100
1 - <10
<1
Readily degradable
yes
0 points*
0 points*
R51/53
R50/53
(corres
(6 points)
(8 points)
ponding to OECD
no
0 points*
0 points*
0 points*
R50
301)
(6 points)
inherently
yes
0 points
0 points
R51/53
R50/53
(but possibly
(6 points)
(8 points)
not readily)
no
0 points
0 points
R51/53
R50/53
degradable**
(6 points)
(8 points)
not readily
yes R53
R52/53
R51/53
R50/53
and/or
(3 points)
(4 points)
(6 points)
(8 points)
not inherently
no 0
points
R52/53
R51/53
R50/53
degradable
(4 points)
(6 points)
(8 points)
* 10 d window is not taken into account in the evaluation of the test on ready biodegradability.
** Substances are inherently biodegradable if they are mineralized in a test on inherent degradability to
an extent of more than 60/70% (oxygen demand / DOC elimination) within 28 days. In the test
according to OECD 302 B, however, the 70% mark must be attained within 7 days.
Example 1: A substance has a toxicity to fishes of LC50 = 7 mg/l; the degradability study shows that it
is not readily degradable; there is no potential for bioaccumulation (log Pow < 3.0). This
leads to a classification into R51/53, and 6 evaluation points are allocated to the
substance.
Example 2: If the substance in Example 1 is readily degradable, an R-phrase classification becomes
unnecessary and no evaluation points are allocated.
If other hazard characteristics are known in addition to those mentioned above (e.g. mutagenic effects),
then R-phrase classification must follow the provisions of the Ordinance on Hazardous Substances (cf.
Section 3.2).
3.4 Allocation of evaluation points and default values
The allocation of evaluation points to the R-phrases of a substance follows the procedures in VwVwS
Annex 3. An overview of the evaluation points is given in Annex 2 of this guideline.
The consideration of the R-phrases and, thus, the allocation of evaluation points is based on the
following principles:
· There is no double tally of R-phrases on acute oral and dermal toxicity to mammals. The more
sensitive characteristic is the only relevant one.
Example 1: A substance classified into R21/22 is allocated 1 evaluation point (not 2 points).
Example 2: A substance classified into R22-24 is allocated 3 evaluation points (neither 4 nor 1 point).
34
· Classifications reflecting long-term or irreversible effects, and repeated exposures are taken into
account in addition to the acute toxicity. Example: A substance classified into R22-40/21/22 is
allocated 1 + 2 = 3 evaluation points.4
· There is no double tally of carcinogenic and mutagenic properties. The more sensitive characteristic
is the only relevant one.
· There is no double tally of toxic effects on reproduction; here again, the more sensitive
characteristic is the only relevant one. Example: A classification into R61-62 results in 4 evaluation
points (not: 4 + 2 = 6).
If an item is missing from the basic data set, then as a precaution a high level of risk is assumed, and
default values are allocated for the corresponding area. For juridical reasons, the allocation of default
values is described in a rather incomprehensible manner in VwVwS, and a more intelligible procedure
is given below:
In the case of gaps in the basic data set, a high level of risk is assumed for precautionary reasons, and
the values given in Table 4 are assigned to the characteristic. This permits a "hypothetical"
classification into R-phrases, leading to a derivation of evaluation points. The default value is the
difference between the evaluation points of the "hypothetical" R-phrases and the R-phrases from the
Ordinance on Hazardous Substances.
Table 4: Precautionary values used to fill gaps in the basic data set
Characteristic missing from the
Precautionary value used for "hypothetical" R-
basic data set
phrase classification
acute toxicity to mammals (oral or dermal)
LD50 = <25 mg/kg body weight
toxicity to an aquatic organism (fishes, algae or daphnia) LC50/EC50/IC50 = <1 mg/l
biodegradability poor
degradability
potential for bioaccumulation
BCF > 100
Example 1: The acute toxicity to mammals is unknown. Therefore, a precautionary LD50 of <25 mg/kg
is assumed according to Table 4, leading to a "hypothetical" classification into R28 and
thus to a default value of 5 points.
Example 2: The toxicity to fishes is LC50 = 8 mg/l. The potential for bioaccumulation is low (log Pow =
2,0); the degradability is unknown. According to the Ordinance on Hazardous
Substances, there is no need to classify the substance in this case. The "hypothetical"
assumption of poor biodegradability, however, results in a classification into R51/53 and
thus to a default value of 6 points.
3.5
Derivation of water hazard classes (WGK)
The evaluation points and default values allocated to a substance are added up to obtain the total
number of points, and thus the water hazard class:
Total number of points
Water hazard class (WGK)
0 to 4
1
5 to 8
2
9 and more
3
When the total is 0 the substance may be classified as "non-hazardous to waters" if it fulfills certain
other prerequisites; see Section 3.7.
4 When R-phrases 20 to 28 form part of an R-phrase combination that applies to long-term or irrever-
sible effects (e.g. R48/25), this describes the pathway of exposure (in this case: oral), and does not
provide an assessment of the acute toxicity. The evaluation points are obtained from Annex 2. This
type of classification does not represent evidence for the completeness of the basic data set.
35
3.6
Documentation of the classification
The classifier is required to document the classification and send a copy for registration and publication
purposes to the Office of Documentation and Information on Substances Hazardous to Waters
(Dokumentations- und Auskunftsstelle wassergefährdende Stoffe im Umweltbundesamt, Schichauweg
58, 12307 Berlin; Fax +49 030-8903-4200). The documentation should adhere to the form of Annex 3.
It is planned to perform the documentation electronically in the future.
The classifier is required to inform the Office of Documentation and Information without delay of any
changes in the data documented.
3.7
Substances non-hazardous to waters
To classify a substance as "non-hazardous to waters", it must first be evaluated according to VwVwS
Annex 3 (as described above). A substance is non-hazardous to waters if its total number of points is 0
and it fulfills all of the following prerequisites:
· Low solubility in water (less than 100 mg/l in the case of gases and solids, less than 10 mg/l in the
case of liquids),
· No toxicity at saturation levels (tested with at least two organisms - fishes, daphnia or algae),
· Ready biodegradability in the case of organic liquids.
The data on toxicity and biodegradability must be documented by laboratory reports or appropriate
literature citations, and they must be sent to the Office of Documentation and Information on
Substances Hazardous to Waters along with the documentation form.
4. Special cases
4.1 Discordant classifications of the same substance
If the Office of Documentation receives two different WGK classifications for one and the same
substance, it will first examine whether one of them is based on default values. If this is the case, the
classification with the lower number of default points will be valid.
If the difference in classification is based on different R-phrases, the Office will inform both classifiers
of the discordance and ask them to compare their data. If this leads to an agreement, the resulting WGK
will be published.
If the comparison does not result in an agreement, the substance will be classified by the Commission
for the Evaluation of Substances Hazardous to Waters (KBwS). If a prolonged delay in the evaluation
by KBwS is to be expected, the higher WGK will be published provisionally. The classification by
KBwS will be published in VwVwS Annex 2.
The data of a documented classification will be made available to third parties only if they can show a
legitimate interest. This usually applies if they are themselves conducting and documenting a
classification of the substance in question, or if they require the data in their capacity as operators in a
water licensing procedure.
4.2 Reclassification of substances named in VwVwS Annex 2
The classifications in VwVwS Annex 2 are based on the former scheme for classification of substances
hazardous to waters. This procedure is documented in LTwS-Schrift No. 28. Applications to reclassify
substances in Annex 2 on the basis of the new evaluation scheme may be submitted to the Commission
for the Evaluation of Substances Hazardous to Waters (KBwS).
36
The application for reclassification must include the data on the identity of the substance along with its
present R-phrase classifications.
The KBwS decides whether a substance is to be reclassified according to VwVwS Annex 3, or whether
it will continue to be named and classified specifically in Annexes 1 or 2.
4.3 Classification of groups, and classification based on analogies
VwVwS does not provide for a classification of groups by classifiers in the industry. If it is desired to
categorize certain groups of substances having the same structural or functional characteristics, or the
same mode of action as a substance group in VwVwS Annexes 1 and 2, a corresponding application
must be submitted to the Commission for the Evaluation of Substances Hazardous to Waters (KBwS).
The WGK of a substance group applies to each individual substance in the group.
In principle, VwVwS does not permit classifications by analogy; rather, the basic data set (cf. Section
3.1) must be created for every substance. Analogies are only permissible in the very restrictive
framework applying to the registration of new notified substances according to the Chemicals Act.
Classifications by analogy are restricted to special cases in which testing is superfluous according to
the present level of scientific knowledge, or impossible for technical reasons.
On the other hand, assessments by analogy may be conducted by KBwS if the data indicate it to be
plausible and sensible. This will generally follow the same procedures named above for the
classification of groups.
4.4 Classification by procedures other than those in VwVwS Annex 3
In most cases the classification scheme based on R-phrases adequately reflect the water hazard
characteristics of a substance. There are a few substances, however, where classification by procedures
other than those in VwVwS Annex 3 will be appropriate. This may be the case when a hazardous
characteristic is not accounted for by R-phrases (e.g. high mobility in the soil with resulting hazards to
the groundwater), or when certain hazardous characteristics leading to R-phrase classifications are not,
or hardly applicable to aquatic pathways (e.g. limited bioavailability).
These cases are assessed by the Commission for the Evaluation of Substances Hazardous to Waters
(KBwS) and published in VwVwS Annexes 1 and 2. Corresponding applications may be submitted to
KBwS. The procedure is described in detail in LTwS-Schrift No. 10 of 1999.
5. Classification of mixtures
VwVwS Annex 4 specifies the methods to derive the water hazard class for a mixture. The first
consists of a computation of the WGK on the basis of the components WGK (as in the 1996 VwVwS).
Secondly, the WGK may be derived from tests conducted with the mixture itself. Results obtained by
the latter method have priority.
5.1 Classification based on the water hazard classes of the components
The computation rule in Annex 4 is basically identical to the former rule in the 1996 VwVwS. It first
requires the determination of the WGK of each single component by the methods that apply to
substances in general. If the identity of a component is unknown or undefined, then as a precaution
WGK 3 is assumed for that component.
37
The mass fractions of the individual components are added up by their WGK, and the WGK of the
mixture is then determined according to Table 5. Components are taken into account if their fraction
surpasses the following thresholds:
· 0.1% in the case of carcinogenic substances
· 0.2% in the case of all other substances
· If carcinogenic substances are actively added to a mixture and their fraction is less than 0.1%, the
mixture is classified at least into WGK 1; the same applies when the fraction of WGK 3 additives is
less than 0.2%.
Table 5: Computation rule for the derivation of the WGK of a mixture from the WGK of its
components
Ingredients Result
(components)
WGK 3
WGK 2
WGK 1
non-hazardous
WGK 3
> 3 %
0.2 to 3 %
< 0.2% in case of
< 0.2% (no additives
additives
permitted)
WGK 2
> 5%
0.2 to 5%
< 0.2%
WGK 1
> 3%
< 3%
non-hazardous
R45
> 0.1%
> 0.1%,
< 0.1% in case of
< 0.1% (no additives
(carcinogenic)
but WGK 2
additives
permitted)
Example 1: If a mixture contains a total of 3% of WGK 2 components and no WGK 3 components, this
yields WGK 1 for the mixture as a whole.
Example 2: If a 0.05% fraction of a WGK 3 component is added to a substance non-hazardous to
waters, the mixture is classified into WGK 1. If, however, the substance contains this
component only as an impurity resulting from the production process, then it is "non-
hazardous to waters".
Example 3 (dilution): A mixture containing a total of 20% of WGK 2 components and 80% of WGK 1
components is classified into WGK 2. If the mixture is diluted with water at a ratio of
1:1, yielding a fraction of 10% of WGK 2 components, it is still classified into WGK 2.
If, however, it is diluted at a ratio of 1:4, the total fraction of WGK 2 components is only
4%, and the diluted mixture is classified into WGK 1.
5.2 Classification based on test data obtained with the mixture
A novel feature of the present VwVwS, compared to the 1996 VwVwS, is that it permits the
classification of mixtures on the basis of test data obtained with the mixture itself. It may become
feasible in the future to apply the corresponding provisions of the Law on Hazardous Substances in
such cases, but the EU Directive 1999/45/EC on classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous
preparations has not yet been adopted into German legislation.
VwVwS Annex 4 Number 4 provides for the following procedure:
· The R-phrases on acute toxicity to mammals are to be determined according to the Law on
Hazardous Substances (either from data obtained with the mixture, or from data on the
components). There are no specific provisions in VwVwS. If test data are not available, then a
default value of 5 points is assumed (as in the case of substances, cf. Section 3).
· The environmental hazard is to be assessed by toxicity tests with at least two aquatic organisms
(fishes, daphnia, or algae). The results lead to an allocation of evaluation points according to Table
38
6.5
· R-phrases on all other hazard characteristics are classified according to the Law on Hazardous
Substances (Ordinance on Preparations) and the evaluation points are allocated according to
VwVwS.
· The evaluation points are added up and the WGK is derived according to the Table in Section 3.5.
Table 6: Evaluation of test results on the aquatic toxicity of mixtures
LC50/EC50/IC50 in mg/l
Evaluation points
(most sensitive value of two trophic levels)
LC/EC/IC > 100
3
10 < LC/EC/IC > 100
4
1 < LC/EC/IC > 10
6
LC/EC/IC < 1
8
tests lacking (or tests with only one species)
8
5.3 Documentation and publication
The classification of mixtures is the responsibility of the manufacturer or distributor. There are no
provisions for centralized collection and publication of the classifications. It is recommended, however,
that classifiers maintain a documentation (on the safety data sheet, if possible), to enable operators of
facilities to prove their adherence to the guidelines in a water licensing procedure.
5.4 Deviation from the classification in VwVwS Annex 4 and Number 2.2.2
The Administrative Regulation provides that classification of a mixture may deviate from the
procedures named above. This may be necessary, for instance, if substances behave differently in the
mixture than they do in the pure state. Another aspect might be that studies on degradation and
bioaccumulation potential of the individual components demonstrate that a mixture exclusively
contains components that are readily degradable and do not bioaccumulate.
In such cases, an application may be submitted to the Commission for the Evaluation of Substances
Hazardous to Waters (KBwS), which may then classify the mixture differently, if appropriate, and
subsequently propose its publication in VwVwS Annex 1 or 2 to the Federal Ministry of the
Environment. Deviating classifications may only be conducted by KBwS; VwVwS does not provide
for classifications based on expert opinions and the like.
6. Office of Documentation and Information on Substances Hazardous to Waters at the Federal
Environmental Agency
Documented WGK classifications are registered and published by the Office of Documentation and
Information on Substances Hazardous to Waters at the Federal Environmental Agency. Publications by
5 Table 6 is based on the assumption that the usual tests on degradability and bioaccumulation will not
always yield adequate results in the case of mixtures. Example: A mixture may have 65% de-
gradability, even though it contains a 10% fraction of a persistent component; based on the precau-
tionary principle, it is therefore assumed that the mixture is not readily degraded and/or that it may
bioaccumulate.
39
the Office include the substances classified by VwVwS Annexes 1 and 2. Thus, all classifications are
available in single list.
Classifications are published by the following methods:
· Internet (Address: www.umweltbundesamt.de/wgk.htm); updated monthly.
· CD-ROM (first publication: end of 1999); updated twice a year.
· In print (first publication: end of 1999); updated once a year.
In addition, WGK classifications can be obtained by calling the phone number
+49-030-8903-4168 (Fax: -4200).
Addresses:
Umweltbundesamt
Dokumentations- und Auskunftsstelle wassergefährdende Stoffe
Schichauweg 58
12307 Berlin
Email: wgk@uba.de
Applications for reclassification and for deviating classifications may be submitted to the KBwS
Secretariat
Geschäftsstelle der Kommission Bewertung wassergefährdender Stoffe (KBwS)
im Umweltbundesamt
Schichauweg 58
12307 Berlin
40
Annex 1: Test procedures for the determination of the basic data set
Test
protocol
Characteristic EU
OECD
CEN
DIN
EN
ISO
DIN
DEV
Acute oral or dermal Corresponding to the effective OECD guidelines (401, 402, 420 oder 423) or EU Directives;
toxicity
for reasons of animal protection, results of similar studies are acceptable if the data have been
to mammals
published in the scientific literature.
Toxicity to aquatic
organisms:
Fishes (acute)
92/69/EEC C.1
203
7346
(38412 L15)**
L15
Algae 92/69/EEC
C.3
201
28692
8692
L9
Daphnia (acute)
92/69/EEC C.2
202,
6341 38412
L11 L40
Part I
Inherent bio-
88/302/EEC
302 B
29888 9888 (38412
L25)** L25
degradability
Teil C
302 C
Readily bio-
92/69/EEC C.4-
301 A
7827
L29
degradable
A
92/69/EEC
C.4-
301 B
29439
9439
L23
C
92/69/EEC C.4-F
301 C
92/69/EEC C.4-E
301 D
10707 (draft)
10708
92/69/EEC
C.4-
301 E
B
92/69/EEC
C.4-
301 F
29408
9408 (draft)
L22
D
14593
(draft)
Bioaccumulation
behavior,*
log Pow
107
117
Bioaccumulation in
305
fishes
* It is permissible to assess the bioacumulation behavior by computing a log octanol/water distribution
coefficient (log Pow) (according to Chapter 4 of the Technical Documents in Support of the Com-
mission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment of New Notified Substances, and of Commission
Regulation 1488/94 on Risk Assessment of Existing Substances, Ispra 1996).
** Older results obtained with tests corresponding to this norm may be used as well.
41
Annex 2: Allocation of evaluation points for R-phrases, and of default values
Number of points
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ecotoxicity and
degradation/bio-
accumulation
52/53
51/53
50/53
undetermined
] 3)
] 2)
] 1)
Ecotoxicity
52 50
undetermined
] 4)
Degradation/bio-
accumulation
53
undetermined
] 5)
Acute oral and/or
22
25 28
dermal toxicity to
65
24
27
mammals
21
23/25
26/28
20/22
24/25
27/28
21/22
23/24/25
26/27/28
20/21/22
23/24
26/27
20/21
undetermined
]
Carcinogenic and/or
40 45
mutagenic effects
46
Irreversible effects
40/21 39/24 39/27
40/22
39/25
39/28
40/20/21
39/23/24
39/26/27
40/20/22
39/23/25
39/26/28
40/21/22
39/24/25
39/27/28
40/20/21/22
39/23/24/25
39/26/27/28
Repeated
33 48/24
exposure
48/21
48/25
48/22
48/23/24
48/20/21
48/23/25
48/20/22
48/24/25
48/21/22
48/23/24/25
48/20/21/22
Toxic effects on
62 60
reproduction
63
61
Harmful reaction
29
with water
15/29
] = Number of points in cases where one or several of the characteristics "ecotoxicity", "degra-
dation/bioaccumulation" and "acute toxicity" are not determined, or unknown (see footnotes)
Note: Not all evaluation points are allocated additively (cf. VwVwS Annex 3).
42
Footnote 1) : This value is allocated when
· Ecotoxicity, and degradation and/or bioaccumulation are unknown, or
· Ecotoxicity is unknown and ready degradation has not been demonstrated, or
· Ecotoxicity is unknown and bioaccumulation potential exists, or
· The substance is classified into R 50, and degradation and/or bioaccumulation are unknown
Footnote 2) : This value is allocated when ecotoxicity is greater than 1 and smaller than or equal to 10 mg/l, and
degradation and/or bioaccumulation are unknown.
Footnote 3) : This value is allocated when ecotoxicity is greater than 10 and smaller than or equal to 100 mg/l, and
degradation is unknown.
Footnote 4) : This value is allocated when ecotoxicity is unknown, and ready degradation has been demonstrated and no
potential for bioaccumulation exists.
Footnote 5) : This value is allocated when
· Degradation and bioaccumulation are unknown, and ecotoxicity is greater than 100 mg/l, or
· Degradation is unknown and bioaccumulation potential exists, and ecotoxicity is greater than 100
mg/l, or
· Bioaccumulationis unknown and ready degradation or inherent degradation have not been
demonstrated, and ecotoxicity is greater than 100 mg/l.
Note: Bioaccumulation potential exists when log Pow > 3.0, unless BCF < 100.
43
Annex 3 Documentation form for WGK classifications
Documentation of WGK classification according to Annex 3 of the Administrative Regulation on
Substances Hazardous to Waters (VwVwS) of 17 May, 1999
Applicant data (simultaneously used as return address):
Company
Contact
person
Department
Street / P.O. Box
Postal code and city
e-mail address
Data on the substance
Unequivocal chemical
name of the substance
Synonymous name
(optional)
CAS-No.6
EC-No.
R-phrases according to
Annex 1 RL 67/548/EEC
R-phrase self-classification according
to § 4a (3) of the Ordinance on
Hazardous Substances
R-phrase evaluation points
according to VwVwS
Default value for
toxicity to mammals
Default value for
environmental hazard
Total number of points
6 This information is only required if a CAS-number has been allocated. The commercial name and the
EC-number are sufficient in the case of new notified substances according to the Law on Chemicals if
characteristics of the substance are confidential.
44
Additional data only for "substances non-hazardous to waters":
Laboratory
State report
(solid, liquid, gas)
included?
Solubility in water
mg/l
Aquatic toxicity Species LCx/ECx/ICx Value
in
mg/l
Species 1
Species 2
Biodegradability Test
Degree of degradation 10 d window attained?
after 28 d in %
(only in the case of
organic liquids)
The applicant must inform the Federal Environmental Agency, Office of Documentation and
Information on Substances Hazardous to Waters (Dokumentations- und Auskunftsstelle
wassergefährdende Stoffe im Umweltbundesamt, Schichauweg 58, 12307 Berlin) of any new
information leading to a change in WGK.
Comments of the
applicant
Applicants should inform the Office of Documentation and Information on Substances Hazardous to
Waters at the Federal Environmental Agency of any characteristics that may affect the hazard to waters
and are not represented by R-phrase classifications known to them (e.g. characteristics related to
mobility in the soil).
Date
Signature of the applicant, stamp
The above classification has been registered by the Federal Environmental Agency, Office of
Documentation and Information on Substances Hazardous to Waters.
Registration
Date
No.
Reference
Stamp, Signature
45
Annex 4: Examples of evaluations
Example 1 - A substance that is already classified
Situation
The water hazard class of 2-chloroaniline is to be determined.
Procedure
2-chloroaniline is classified in VwVwS Annex 2 (Registration No. 694, WGK 2). This water hazard
class is valid and no further action is needed.
Example 2 - A substance that is well-researched and relatively non-hazardous
Situation
The following data are known:
· Acute oral toxicity to mammals, determined in rats: LD50 >2000 mg/kg body weight
· Toxicity to fishes: LC50 > 100 mg/l
· Toxicity to algae: IC50 = 580 mg/l
· Toxicity to daphnia: EC50 = >1000 mg/l
· Degradability: readily biodegradable according to OECD 301 D
· log Pow = 2.5
· State: solid
· Solubility in water = 1150 mg/l
Procedure
According to Hazardous Substances Law, an R-phrase classification of this substance is unnecessary.
The basic data set is available. There are no default values to be allocated and the total number of
points is 0. Because the substance has a solubility in water greater than 100 mg/l, however, it can not be
classified as "non-hazardous to waters" (VwVwS No. 2.2.2). Therefore the water hazard class is
WGK 1.
Example 3 - A substance that is well-researched and relatively hazardous
Situation
The following data are known:
· Acute oral toxicity to mammals, determined in rats: LD50 = 150 mg/kg body weight
· Toxicity to fishes: LC50 = 10 mg/l
· Toxicity to algae: IC50 = 5 mg/l
· Toxicity to daphnia: EC50 = 70 mg/l
· Degradability: not readily biodegradable according to OECD 301 E, but inherently degradable
according to OECD 302 B
· log Pow = 2.5
Procedure
Because of its toxicity to mammals, the substance is classified into R25 (range of toxicity: 25 < LD50 <
200 mg/kg).
The assessment of environmental hazard depends on the most sensitive organism (in this case: algae).
The toxicity to algae is situated in the range between 1 and 10 mg/l, and the substance is not readily
biodegradable. Therefore, it is classified into R51/53. Comments: The inherent degradability of the
substance does not result in a change in classification; if it were readily biodegradable, an R-phrase
classification due to environmental hazard would be unnecessary.
All of the data of the basic data set are available; therefore no default values are allocated.
46
The total number of points according to VwVwS Annex 3 No. 1 is 3 (due to R25) plus 6 (due to
R51/53), equal to 9 points. Therefore the water hazard class is WGK 3.
Example 4 - A substance that is not well-researched (I)
Situation
The following data are known:
· Acute oral toxicity to mammals, determined in rats: LD50 >2000 mg/kg body weight
· State: solid
· Solubility in water = 50 mg/l
Procedure
The data do not necessitate a classification into R-phrases; therefore, this does not result in any
evaluation points.
The basic data set is incomplete, however, because there are no known experimental data on the
environmental hazard. Therefore, VwVwS Annex 3 No. 2 requires the allocation of a default value
with the highest possible number of points for environmental hazard (8 points, corresponding to
R50/53).
Thus, the total number of points is 8 and the water hazard class is WGK 2.
Example 5 - A substance that is not well-researched (II)
Situation
The following data are known:
· Acute oral toxicity to mammals, determined in rats: LD50 >500 mg/kg body weight
· Toxicity to fishes: LC50 = 50 mg/l
Procedure
Because of its toxicity to mammals, the substance is classified into R22 (range of toxicity: 200 to 2000
mg/kg).
The data on toxicity to fishes do not necessitate an R-phrase classification. The need to allocate default
values according to VwVwS Annex 3 No. 2 must be examined, however, because the basic data set is
incomplete (lack of data on biodegradability and on bioaccumulation potential). The lack of data
implies that the substance might not be readily biodegradable, in which case it would have to be classi-
fied into R52/53. Therefore, the default value is 4 (corresponding to R52/53). On the other hand, the
bioaccumulation potential is irrelevant with respect to an allocation of default values, because it would
not require R-phrase classification in any case.
Thus the total number of points is 1 (due to R22) plus 4 (default value), equal to 5, and the water
hazard class is WGK 2.
Example 6 - Classification of a mixture based on data on its components
Situation
All components of a mixture, as well as their water hazard classes, are known. The total sums of the
fractions by water hazard class are as follows:
· Substances non-hazardous to waters: 9.9%
· WGK 1: 89%
· WGK 2: 1%
· WGK 3: 0.1 %
· Carcinogenic substances: none
Procedure
47
The hazard is determined in this case by the fractions of WGK 1, as well as WGK 2 substances.
According to VwVwS Annex 4 No. 3.2, mixtures consisting of 0.2 to <5% WGK 2 substances, and
mixtures with 3% or more WGK 1 substances are classified into WGK 1. At the same time, the fraction
of WGK 3 substance is lower than the threshold required for consideration according to VwVwS
Annex 4 No. 1.
The water hazard class of the mixture is WGK 1.
Example 7- Classification based on test data obtained with the mixture
Situation
The components of a mixture are only partially known, but tests with the mixture itself have given the
following results:
· Acute oral toxicity to mammals, determined in rats: LD50 >2000 mg/kg body weight
· Toxicity to fishes: LC50 = 15 mg/l
· Toxicity to daphnia: EC50 = 7 mg/l
Procedure
The acute toxicity to mammals does not necessitate a classification into R-phrases; therefore, it does
not result in any evaluation points.
According to VwVwS Annex 4 No. 4.3, the allocation of evaluation points for environmental hazard
depends on the most sensitive organism (in this case: daphnia). As the toxicity to daphnia is in the
range between 1 and 10 mg/l, 6 points are allocated according to VwVwS Annex 4 No. 4.3.
The total number of points is 6 and the resulting water hazard class of the mixture is WGK 2.
48
Annex 4
Alarm criteria
49
ANNEX 4 Alarm Criteria
Assessment
of water pollution resulting from accidents
in the framework of the "International Warning and Alert Plan for the Danube
With the help of the chart below the substances classified according to water risk classes
(WRC7) and/or R-phrases8 can be linked to certain alert thresholds. If these values are
exceeded in the event of an accidental release of substances into waters, an "Information" or a
"Warning" is set off according to the alert scheme of the "International Warning and Alert
Plan for the Danube".
The alert thresholds mentioned (daily loads resulting from accidents), as well as the open
scaling according to water pollution indexes (WRI)9, are mere frameworks of orientation to
facilitate the decision within the system of the "International Warning and Alert Plan of the
Danube"
In the case the flow rate exceeds 1000 m³ per sec. the Alert-thresholds are multiplied by the factor 10.
Substance classifications
Alert thresholds
INFORMATION
WARNING
WRC
R - phrases
[ kg ] or [ l ]
[ kg ] or [ l ]
"0" -
22
10,000
100,000
10n+3
- 25, 52/53, 52 or 53
1
1,000
10,000
10n+2
- 50, 51/53, 28 or
2
45
- (52/53, 52 or 53)
100
1,000
10n+1
and (22 or 25)
-
50/53
- (50, 51/53, 52/53,
3
52 or 53)
10
100
10n
and (45 or 28)
-
45
and 28
Water Risk Index (WRI)3
1
2
n
7 Katalog wassergefährdender Stoffe, LTwS Nr. 12, Umweltbundesamt 1991;
http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/wgs/wgs-index.htm
8 Directive 67/548/EEC ff.
9 The Water Risk Index is intended to scale water pollution events.
50
Substance mixtures (oils, quench water and slurry)
From past accidents we know that the substances most frequently released by accidents in the
Danube catchment area are heterogenious groups of substances and mixtures as, for instance,
mineral oils, slurry and quench water.
To obtain alert thresholds the risk emanating from each substance mixture can be
characterised by classifying the corresponding indicator substances.
For non-specified oils, quench water and slurry, the following alert thresholds were
determined:
INFORMATION
WARNING
Released substance mixture
[ kg ] or [ l ]
[ kg ]or [ l ]
-
Oils
(non-specified)
100
1,000
10n+1
-
Quench
water
1,000
10,000
10n+2
-
Slurry
1,000
10,000
10n+2
Water Risk index (WRI)
1
2
n
Substances and substance mixtures, for which no classification of the risk they pose to
water can be determined, should be treated as WRC 3 substances for reasons of
precaution.
Explanation of R-phrases
R 22
Harmful if swallowed
R 25
Toxic if swallowed
R 28
Very toxic if swallowed
R 45
May cause cancer
R 50
Very toxic to aquatic organisms
R 52
Harmful to aquatic organisms
R 53
May cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment
R 50/53
Very toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment
R 51/53
Toxic to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment
R 52/53
Harmful to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment
51
Annex 5
Information-Sources
52
ANNEX 5 Information sources for national ARS Inventories
Country
Source of information
Germany
Bavarian State Office for Water Management
County District Offices and the Non-District Municipalities
Austria
Czech Rep.
Czech Inspection of Environment, evaluated by experts from Ministry of Environment (water
protection department).
Slovakia
Water Protection Inspectorates of the Slovak Inspectorate of the Environment
Hungary
Ministry for Environment, Department for Environmental Safety and Health
Slovenia
Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning
Croatia
Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning
"Hrvatske vode" Zagreb (Croatian Waters Zagreb - Water management company)
INA Industrija nafte d.d. Zagreb (INA Oil Industry Join-stock company)
Romania
Romanian Water Authority (C.N. "Apele Romane")
Bulgaria
Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Water.
database of the State Agency for Civil Protection
Moldova
The Ministry of Ecology, Construction and Territorial Development, State Ecological Inspectorate
Ukraine
53
Annex 6
Difficulties - ARS
54
ANNEX 6 - Difficulties occurred during the development of the national
ARS inventories
As was already pointed at the first ARS ad-hoc EG Meeting some inconsistencies between the
content and presentation of the national ARS Inventories have been identified. More than this not all
ICPDR contracting parties presented the above mentioned inventories, despite of certain delays in this
respect. As a consequence it was considered that in the process of the ARS-inventory preparation some
difficulties could exist, particularly for the countries with the economy in transition. A request in this
matter was sent on 19th June to each riparian country in order to identify these difficulties. Based on the
answers received up till 18th July the following information could be derived:
1. General
considerations
The ECE Convention on transboundary industrial hazards (Helsinki 1992) still represents one
of the task for some countries in the process of accession to the EU, particularly the ratification of this.
This represents one of the explanation that the methodological instruments and procedures are in the
preparatory phase for these countries, despite of already existing experience in the transboundary water
quality monitoring and AEWS operation. More than this the transposition of the Seveso II Directive is
still under the way for these countries. As a first consequence the Elbe methodology for some of the
accession countries is still not familiar. There also are the other difficulties generated, particularly by
the following factors:
1.1.
The ECE 76/464 Directive and the daughter Directives regarding the dangerous
chemicals for the water is in the process to be absorbed by the European Water
Framework Directive. However each accession country has to considered this,
despite of the fact that some of its provisions are overpass.
1.2.
There are the other lists concerning the dangerous chemicals for the waters (Helsinki
Convention regarding the transboundary rivers and international lakes, Convention of
the Danube River Protection, EWFD/EU priority lists a.s.o.) which are based on
different approaches and not fully congruent.
1.3.
The ECE Convention on transboundary industrial hazards and particularly the Seveso
II Directive are not referring to the water endangered cases only.
As an overall result the approaches in the Inventory preparation are still different:
(i)
starting from the point and diffuse discharges inventories of waste waters in the
surface waters: based on the best expert judgement and taking also in the view the
landfill relevant sites; this represents usual way of the ARS-Inventories draw-up
system for the most countries with the economy in the transition process.
(ii)
using the Rhine/Elbe methodology (EU member).
The Baia Mare Task Force represented from this point of view the first step in the overcoming
these general difficulties being realized the first inventory (ARS) at the level of Tisza River Basin
(Ukraine, Romania, Hungary).
In this respect the present ARS-Inventory could be consider the second step in the process of
the harmonization of the approaches first of all, despite of some inconstancies which may still exist.
2. Problems encored in the preparation of the ARS Inventories
Based upon the answers received the following remarks could be stated:
55
2.1. General
overview
No basic or major difficulties have been recorded during the ARS Inventories preparation.
2.2.
Particular difficulties
Some of particular difficulties, specific for certain countries have been identified during the
ARS Inventories carrying-out process, the most relevant being as follows:
2.2.1. Database availability for the chemicals toxic properties assessment. In this regard not
all the riparian countries are provided with this requirements (BIG database or similar
see Croatia response).
2.2.2. Luck of a basic methodology or system for the ARS ranking.
2.2.3. Organizational problems particularly for the countries where the infrastructure of the
National Authority is changing.
2.2.4. Data/ information flux from the territory to the Central Authority; this is almost
related with the above (2.2.2.) mentioned remark.
2.2.5. The implementation/ access to the GIS especially the software.
2.2.6. Luck of the proper information in some circumstances related with the deactivation
of old installations.
2.2.7. Flood events consequences and landfills sites control (in the view of risk assessment
and management).
2.2.8. Proper training of the Local Authority responsible persons in the data/ information
content issues for the inventories drawing up process.
3. Draft conclusions and recommendations
§ There are not major difficulties for the ARS Inventories generation. From country to country,
particularly for those with the economy in the transition some problems have been identified, the
most frequent being related with: (i) database provisions in order to assess the toxic properties of
the chemicals (R phrases system and water risk class); (ii) methodological issues for the ranking
system. The both difficulties might be overcome using the Ad-hoc EG result dissemination.
§ The other difficulties occurred by some countries in the ARS Inventory preparation process need
to be solved by own efforts.
§ As an overview it might be of interest to be periodically organized a suitable and flexible training
system in this matter one of the alternative/ advisable solution being using the already existing
ICPDR informative system (DANUBIS).
Attached is presented a summary of the answers received from the ICPDR AEPWS EG members
till 18th July.
56
Tab. 1 Summary of the answers concerning the difficulties occurred in the national ARS
Inventory preparation
No.
Country
Remarks problems encountered
Data of
receiving
0 1
2
3
1.
CROATIA
Missing information on toxic properties of chemicals. BIG
19.06
database is not available for Croatia. There is UBA web site
access.
2.
SLOVENIA
1. Inner staff organization caused by Ministry reorganization
29.06
(New Agency of Environment).
2. The classification of dangerous substances was done in
accordance with WGK provisions (toxic properties). It was
adopted the solution of landfill sites inventory for dangerous
substances.
(How to extract those risk spots which might have a directed
impact in the water system usually based on the expert
analyses.)
3.
MOLDOVA
-
no relevant difficulties to collect the information for ARS
22.06
inventory. Name of enterprise, its location and amount of
substances stored are collected and presented in the Annual
Report of the State Ecological Inspectorate.
-
The ownership needs to be found specifically.
4.
AUSTRIA
No relevant difficulties. However should be considered the time
*
constrains in extracting the relevant water-related data out of the
whole data-information on dangerous substances in order to
synthesize the Inventory on installations with water endangering
substances exceeding the relevant threshold quantities in the
Danubian part of territory.
Note: this was presented early may.
5.
HUNGARY
-
no basic difficulties have been met during the preparation of
12.07
the Danube ARS Inventory.
-
The GIS-based national inventory of dangerous dischargers
and potential polluters is under preparation in the Ministry of
Environment and items of the ARS inventory were taken
from this wide database.
-
Because the Elbe methodology was strictly followed, several
big potential ARS spots are missing from the inventory
provided, because their locations are out of considered area.
-
Some practical problems with the Excel sheets were faced
only.
6.
ROMANIA
-
There are not basic difficulties for the ARS Inventory
development.
-
However some problems have occurred in the selection of the
Accident Risk spots from the general Inventory of the point
and diffuse sources of water pollution. This is most related
with the luck of an uniform methodology in this respect.
-
Specific problems have been identified with the risk related
to the old industrial installations deactivation and with the
accidents caused by floody conditions and the landfills
disposal sites of industrial wastes.
57
ARS Germany
ARS Germany
Bezugsmenge (kg/l)
WGK-3 Äquivalente
WRI
lfd
Name des
Standort/
Betriebs- zweck/
vorhandene
Masse
W
Summe
.
Betriebs/
Nr
Betreiber
Landkreis
Anlagenart
wasser-gefährdende
in Tonnen G
.
Stoffe
K
1 Zweckverband
Schwandorf, Lkr. Müllver-brennung, Heizöl EL
1500 2
1,500,000
150,000
150,000
5.2
Müllverwertung Schwandorf
Lageranlage
2 Bayernoil
Stadt Ingolstadt
Raffinerie,
Zwischen- und
600,000 3
600,000,000
600,000,000
642,000,000
8.8
Tanklager
Fertigprodukte
400,000 2
400,000,000
40,000,000
200,000 1
200,000,000
2,000,000
3 Audi AG
Stadt Ingolstadt
Automobil-werk
Altemulsion
450 3
450,000
450,000
700,000
5.8
Lageranlagen
Heizöl
2500 2
2,500,000
250,000
8.5
4 Deutsche
Lenting, Lkr.
Tanklager
Rohöl
300,000 3
300,000,000
300,000,000
300,000,000
Transalpine
Eichstätt
Ölleitung
5 e-on Kraftwerk
Großmehring
Tanklager
Heizöl S
340,000 1
340,000,000
3,400,000
4,900,000
6.7
Lkr. Eichstätt
Heizöl EL
15,000 2
15,000,000
1,500,000
8.8
6 ESSO
Kösching, Lkr.
Raffinerie,
Heizöl EL
95,000 2
95,000
9,500
700,429,500
Eichstätt
Tanklager
Rohöl
700,000 3
700,000,000
700,000,000
Heizöl S
42,000 1
42,000,000
420,000
7 Zentralklinikum Stadt Augsburg
Heizzentrale
Heizöl EL
2,000 2
2,000,000
200,000
200,000
5.3
Augsburg
Lageranlage
8 Fa. Sailer
Stadt Augsburg
Lageranlage
Altöl und Heizöl
3,300 3
3,300,000
3,300,000
3,300,000
6.5
Umwelttechnik
2
9 Fa. Haindl
Stadt Augsburg
Papierfabrik
Bindemittel, Laugen,
3,000 1
3,000,000
30,000
630,000
5.8
LAU- und HBV
Entschäumer, Heizöl,
6,000 2
6,000,000
600,000
10 Fa. Präg GmbH Stadt Augsburg
Tanklager
Heizöl EL, DK, VK
18,000 2
18,000,000
1,800,000
1,800,000
6.3
& Co. KG
3
11 Fa. MAN B&W Stadt Augsburg
LAU- und HBV
Heizöl EL, DK, VK,
1,000 2
1,000,000
100,000
100,000
5.0
Diesel AG
Altöl, Motorenöl,
3
Page 1 of 6
ARS Germany
12 Gesellschaft zur Stadt Augsburg
Lagern und
Abfälle, Altöl,
300 1
300,000
30,000
30,000
4.5
Entsorgung von
Behandeln von
Deponiesicker-wasser,
2
Sondermüll in
Sondermüll
Trenn-mittel, Säure,
3
13 Lech-
Gersthofen
Lageranlage
Heizöl
10,000 2
10,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
6.0
Elektrizitäts-werk Lkr. Augsburg
14 Clariant GmbH
Gersthofen
Lageranlagen
diverse
1,900 2
1,900,000
190,000
330,000
5.5
Lkr. Augsburg
HBV-Anlage
diverse
140 3
140,000
140,000
15 Kosa GmbH &
Gersthofen
Lageranlage
Heizöl
1,200 2
1,200,000
120,000
720,000
5.9
Co. KG
Lkr. Augsburg
Lageranlage
Xylol
6,000 2
6,000,000
600,000
16 Schmid Andreas Gersthofen
Lageranlage
brennbare Flüssigkeiten
960 3
960,000
960,000
960,000
6.0
Lkr. Augsburg
17 Gba
Langweid
Lageranlage
diverse
13,000 2
13,000,000
1,300,000
1,850,000
6.3
Spezialitätenchem Lkr. Augsburg
550 3
550,000
550,000
18 SGL Carbon AG Meitingen
Lageranlage
Heizöl
2000 2
2,000,000
200,000
200,000
5.3
Lkr. Augsburg
19 Fa. Sailer
Neusäß
Lageranlage
Heizöl
2000 2
2,000,000
200,000
200,000
5.3
Mineralöl
Lkr. Augsburg
20 Bayernoil
Vohburg
Tanklager
Rohöl
300,000 2
300,000,000
30,000,000
184,750,000
8.3
Lkr. Pfaffenhofen
Zwischen- und
Mineralöl-produkte
300,000 2
300,000,000
30,000,000
154,750,000
8.2
Fertigpro-duktelage
r
120,000 3
120,000,000
120,000,000
100,000 1
100,000,000
1,000,000
Tanklager
Additive
1,000 2
1,000,000
100,000
Sonstige (Slops,
Diverse (z.B. LCB)
3,500 3
3,500,000
3,500,000
div. Chemik.)
HBV
Rohöle und
1,500 2
1,500,000
150,000
Zwischenprodukte
3
21 TAL
Vohburg
Entlastungs-tank
Rohöl
12,000 3
12,000,000
12,000,000
12,000,000
7.1
Lkr. Pfaffenhofen Pipeline
22 MERO
Vohburg
Tanklager
Rohöl
180,000 2
180,000,000
18,000,000
18,000,000
7.3
Lkr. Pfaffenhofen
Page 2 of 6
ARS Germany
23 e-on
Irsching
Tanklager
Heizöl
150,000 2
150,000,000
15,000,000
15,000,000
7.2
Lkr. Pfaffenhofen Heizkraftwerk
24 Ruhr Oel
Münchsmünster
Tanklager
Mineralöl-produkte
20,000 3
20,000,000
20,000,000
20,000,000
7.3
Lkr. Pfaffenhofen
25 SKW
Münchsmünster
Tanklager
ACH
1,300 3
1,300,000
1,300,000
1,600,000
6.2
Lkr. Pfaffenhofen
Lageranlagen
brennbare Flüssigkeiten
2,000 2
2,000,000
200,000
u.a.
Diverse
NaOH, HCl,
10,000 1
10,000,000
100,000
Lageranlagen
Essigsäure, usw.
26 GSB
Ebenhausen- Werk Tanklager 1,2,3
verunreinigte
1,400 3
1,400,000
1,400,000
4,750,000
6.7
Lösemittel
Lkr. Pfaffenhofen
Fasslager und -
Sondermüll
900 3
900,000
900,000
behandlung
Bunker
Sondermüll, Feststoffe
2,000 3
2,000,000
2,000,000
und Schlämme
Abstell-flächen für
450
450,000
450,000
Mulden und
Wechsel-brücken
27 Sifokan
Ebenhausen-
Lageranlagen
div. feste und flüssige
2,500 3
2,500,000
2,500,000
2,500,000
6.4
Lkr. Pfaffenhofen
Stoffe
28 Industrieverwaltu Oberhausen
Tanklager
F 34 und F 35
ca. 65.000
2 ca. 65000000
6,500,000
16,500,000
7.2
ngs-gesellschaft
IVG Logistik
Lkr. Neuburg-
NATO-Flugplatz
GmbH
Schroben-hausen
betriebseig.
Reststoffe
ca. 10.000
3 ca. 10000000
10,000,000
Lageranlage
29 FBG Weichering Weichering
Pipeline
F 34 und F 54
ca. 30.000
2 ca. 30000000
3,000,000
3,000,000
6.5
Lkr. Neuburg-
Tanklager
Schroben-hausen
30 DTL
Deggendorf
Tanklager
Gasöl (Diesel)
ca. 8.500
2 ca. 8500000
850,000
850,000
5.9
Donautanklager-g Lkr. Deggendorf
31 BayWa AG
Plattling
Lageranlage
Pflanzenschutz-mittel
ca. 200
3 ca. 200000
200,000
200,000
5.3
Lkr. Deggendorf
32 Wieland-Werke Vöhringen
Halbzeug-herstellu Tetrachlorethen
130 3
130,000
130,000
130,000
5.1
AG
Lkr. Neu-Ulm
ng
Page 3 of 6
ARS Germany
33 Bayernwerk
Vilshofen
Kraftwerk
Heizöl EL
5,500 2
5,500,000
550,000
550,000
5.7
Lkr. Passau
34 BMW AG
Stadt Regensburg Automobil-werk
Lackierabfälle
150 3
150,000
150,000
250,000
5.4
Lageranlagen
Heizöl
1000 2
1,000,000
100,000
35 Nibelungenkasern Stadt Regensburg Lageranlage
Heizöl
1600 2
1,600,000
160,000
160,000
5.2
e
Standortverwaltun
g
36 Südzucker AG
Stadt Regensburg Lageranlage
Heizöl S
22,000 1
22,000,000
220,000
220,000
5.3
37 VTG Lenkering Stadt Regensburg Lageranlage
Diesel,
39,000 2
39,000,000
3,900,000
21,900,000
7.3
AG
Heizöl EL
Lageranlage
Benzin
18,000 3
18,000,000
18,000,000
38 Bundeswehrkaser Bogen
Lageranlage
Heizöl EL
2,000 2
2,000,000
200,000
200,000
5.3
ne
Standortverwaltun Lkr. Straubing-
g Bogen
Bogen
39 Bayernoil
Neustadt
Raffinerie
Rohöle und
50,000 1
50,000,000
500,000
160,500,000
8.2
Lkr. Kelheim
Tanklager
Mineralöl-produkte
500,000 2
500,000,000
50,000,000
110,000 3
110,000,000
110,000,000
40 Acordis
Kelheim
Faser-herstellung
ACN
2,000 3
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,185,000
6.3
Lkr. Kelheim
div. Chemikalien
1,850 2
1,850,000
185,000
41 ESSO AG
Stadt Passau
Tanklager
Heizöl
5,000 2
5,000,000
500,000
500,000
5.7
Dieselöl
42 Zahnradfabrik
Stadt Passau
Lageranlage
Emulsion
900 3
900,000
900,000
900,000
6.0
Passau
Altemulsion
43 Bucher
Waldstetten
Chem. Fabrik
div. Chemikalien
1,000 2
1,000,000
100,000
250,000
5.4
Lkr. Günzburg
150 3
150,000
150,000
44 Standortverwaltun Leipheim
Lageranlage
div. Chemikalien
1,700 2
1,700,000
170,000
1,730,000
6.2
g
Lkr. Günzburg
Mineralöl-produkte
1,560 3
1,560,000
1,560,000
Page 4 of 6
ARS Germany
45 Geiss
Offingen
Chem. Fabrik
div. Chemikalien
389 3
389,000
389,000
389,000
5.6
Lkr. Günzburg
46 Fernwärme Ulm Stadt Ulm
Heizwerk
Heizöl
1905 2
190,500
190,500
5.3
GmbH
Einsteinstr. 20
47 Fernwärme Ulm Stadt Ulm
Heizwerk
Heizöl
2610 2
261,000
261,000
5.4
GmbH
Daimlerstr. 29
48 Carl Beiselen
Stadt Ulm
Düngemittel-
Pflanzenschutz-mittel
790 3
790,000
790,000
5.9
GmbH
großhandel
49 Uzin Utz AG
Stadt Ulm
Herstellg. von
Kleberrohstoffe
210 3
210,000
210,000
5.3
Klebstoffen
50 Zweckverband
Stadt Ulm
Müllheizwerk
Haumüll und
5800 3
5,800,000
6,896,000
6.8
Therm.
hausmüllähnl.
Schlacke
720 3
720,000
Asche/
200 3
200,000
Filterkuchen
Verfahrenstechn.
176 3
176,000
Abwasser
51 Wielandwerke
Stadt Ulm
Metall-verarbeitung Schwefelsäure, Natrium-
173 3
173,000
173,000
5.2
AG
dichromat
52 Heidelberger
Schelklingen/
Lageranlage
Heizöl S
16000 1
160,000
160,000
5.2
Zement AG
Alb-Donau-Kreis
53 Standortver-
Laupheim/
Flugfeldbetank-
Flugbenzin AI
300 x 3
3
900,000
900,000
6.0
waltung Ulm
Kreis Biberach
ungsanlage
54 Fina Deutschland Giengen/
Tankstelle/
VK, DK, Heizöl EL,
110 3
110,000
110,000
5.0
GmbH
Lageranlage
Altöl AIII
Heidenheim
Abfüllanlage
55 Südtank GmbH & Heidenheim/
Tankstelle/
Benzin, Diesel, Altöl,
120 3
120,000
120,000
5.1
Co
Heidenheim
Lageranlage
Heizöl
Abfüllanlage
Page 5 of 6
ARS Germany
56 IHKW
Heidenheim/
Öllager/ -
Heizöl EL, Schmieröle,
800 3
800,000
800,000
5.9
Industrieheiz-
Trafoöl
kraftwerk
Heidenheim
Heidenheim
Summe=
2,293,874,000
9.4
1. ) potentielle Einleitstelle: in der gültigen Schifffahrtskilometrierung angeben
2) bei mehreren Anlagenstandorten Mittelwert
Kriterien für die Aufnahme von Anlagen zum Umgang mit wassergefährdenden Stoffen (ohne Tankstellen und Anlagen des Bergbaus):
1. Lage in einem 10 km breiten Streifen längs der Donau oder
2. Lage in einem 10 km breiten Streifen längs eines Nebenflusses der Donau und nicht weiter als 50 km von der Mündung in die Donau entfernt und
3. maßgebliches Volumen: 100 t oder mehr WGK 3, 1000 t oder mehr WGK 2, 10.000 t oder mehr WGK 1.
Page 6 of 6
ARS Austria (no table received)
ARS Czech Republic
ARS Czech Republic
Inventory of potential pollution sources in the Czech part of Morava River basin
No Name and
Location/
Recipient
Company
Dangerous
WGK
Total
Storage
Operational
Remark
Total quantity in Water risk class Sum of water
Water
proprietor of
river (length activities
substances
amount
facilities
volume
kg/l
equivalent
risk class
risk
the company
of the stream
stored/hand
equivalents
index
District
in km)
led
total/free (%)
1.
Farmak, Joint Olomouc/
Morava 225,7 pharmaceutical sulphuric acid,
1
50/25 t
tanks,
40 m3
municipal
177000
1770
1770
3.2
Stock
Olomouc
Danube
production
hydrochl. acid,
1
60/30 t
pipelines,
45 m3
WWTP
Company
sodium chloride,
technological
units
ammonium,
0
25/25 t
40 m3
sodium
2
10/5 t
10 m3
hydroxide
1
32/32 t
45 m3
2.
Lukana, Joint Olomouc/
Morava 222
methanol,
1
100/100 t
tanks,
150 m3
own
1600000
16000
16000
4.2
Stock
Olomouc
Danube
methylester of
01.Feb
1500/150 t
pipelines,
300 m3
biological
Company.
vegetable oil
technological
WWTP
(biofuel)
units
3.
Deza, Joint
Valasské
Becva 59
black coal tar black pitch,
2
6226/113 t
tanks,
5000 m3
own
102672000
10267200
10267200
7.0
Stock
Mezirící/
Morava 210,6 and raw
tar,
2
30000/500 t pipelines,
7000 m3
biological
Company
Vsetín
Danube
benzene
raw anthr. oil,
2
5126/2563 t technological
WWTP
3500 m3
treatment
units
raw naphft. oil,
2
3880/1940 t
3000 m3
raw benzene,
2
16000/6000
9000 m3
t
pure benzene,
2
12000/6000
8000 m3
t
pure toluene,
2
2600/1300 t
2000 m3
pure xylene,
2
500/250 t
400 m3
benzine,
2
1340 t
2000 m3
black oil
1
25000/5000
10000 m3
t
Precheza, Joint Prerov/Prerov Becva 10,5
production of sulphuric acid,
1
10400/2600 tanks,
5000 m3
all waters
14500000
145000
145000
5.2
4.
Stock
sulphuric acid,
t
pipelines,
are
Company
Morava 210,6 titan dioxides,
200/50 t
technological 100 m3
neutralised
Danube
inorganic
1800/600 t
units
1000 m3
in own
pigments,
coagulant,
1500/750 t
neutralisatio
1100 m3
coagulants
n unit
petrol
2
600/200 t
400 m3
Aliachem,
Chropyne/
Malá Becva
rubber and
dimethylform-
1
120/120 t
tanks,
180 m3
own
240000
2400
2400
3.4
Joint Stock
15,7
plastic
amide,
pipelines,
biological
5.
Company
products
technological
WWTP
part of
Kromeríz
Morava 189
dibutylftalate
units
Technoplast
co.
Danube
1
120/120
180 m3
Page 1 of 2
ARS Czech Republic
Kozeluzny,
Otrokovice/
Morava 177,6 tanneries
technological
6.
Ltd.
sludge
Kozeluzny
Zlín
Danube
KTO Ltd.
Toma Joint
Stock Co.
Fosfa, Joint
Postorná/
Dyje
phosphates
P4
200 t
tanks,
2350 t
1228000
12280
12280
4.1
7.
Stock
(Thaya)17
production
pipelines,
Company
Breclav
Morava 69
H3PO4
1
455 t
technological 610 t
units
Danube
H2SO4
1
573 t
1507 t
CEZ, Joint
Dukovany/
Jihlava 59,2
Nuclear Power toxic substanc.,
0,9 t
glass jars,
reserves according
88000
8800
8800
3.9
Stock
Plant
to the process
8.
Company
Nuclear Power Trebíc
Dyje
oils, petrol,
2
80 metal tanks in
Plant
(Thaya)66
t
pools
Dukovany
Morava 69
oxygen,
hydrogen,
Danube
combustible
6,4 t
substamces
0,6 t
DIAMO, State Dolní
Nedvedicka 13 uranium mines, uranium and its
1
13 416 434 two ponds with 1 789 519 m3/18% 2 ponds
13416434000
134164340
134164340
8.1
9.
Enterprise, part Rozínka/
classical
radionuclides,
t, i.e.
earth dam
of GEAM co. Zd ár nad
Svratka 95,5
mining
neutralisation
10 062 325
Sázavou
methods,
sludge
m3 of pulp
Dyje
alkaline
(Thaya)66
leaching
Morava 69
Danube
Summe
144617790
8.2
The missing data were not available or their determination was not possible, e.g toxicity, free operational volume in tanks.
Summe-Industrie
10453450
7.0
Page 2 of 2
ARS Slovak Republic
ARS Slovakia
Inventory of potentially hazardous plants in the Danube river basin in Slovakia
Name of
Location/
Name of
River km
Km to est.
Type of plant
Hazardous
Max. storage
WHC
R phr.
Comments
S/P
SE
Water risk
Sum of water Water risk
company/operato district
tributary water
(potential
into the
(type of
substances
capacity
class
risk class
index
r
production,
equivalent
equivalents
discharge)
Danube
used technology)
/m3/
1
SAM, a. s. Myjava Myjava
Myjava
62.4
133.9 Galvanic
oils
142
2
65 WWT
P
14200
29200
4.5
Morava
71.5
metal-plating
splinters /Fe, Ms,
150
2
15.17 of city Myjava
15000
Al/
2
SH, a. s. Senica
Senica
Teplica-3
1.8
101.4 Viscose silk
heavy heating oils
7 700 t
2
65 own WWT
P
SE
770000
production
806120
5.9
Myjava
28.1
methanol
535 t
1
11.39
5350
Morava
71.5
ethyleneglycol
630 t
1
10
6300
CS2
100 t
1
11.48
1000
NaOH
2 200 t
1
35
22000
H2 SO4
147 t
1
35
1470
3
NAFTA
Skalica
Gbelský cr.
1.75
97.25 Repairs and
petroleum
100
3
65.45
S
100000
ZÁHORIE,
maintaning
100000
5.0
a. s. Gbely
Morava
95.5
4
NAFTA
Senica
Teplica-3
Liquidation of
solid waste
60 000
1
P
SE
600000
ZÁHORIE,
waste
600000
5.8
a. s. Gbely
Myjava
28.1
Morava
71.5
5
Hebel Pórobetón Senica
Sastínsky cr.
1.6
87.5 Building industry hydrate of calcium
246 t
1
own WWT
S
2460
Sastín,
2460
3.4
s. r. o.
Myjava
14.4
Morava
71.5
6
KOVOTVAR VD, Senica
Zelnícky cr.
4.5
82.4 Surface modif. of NH3
150 t
2
10.5
P
SE
15000
Kúty
metals
15000
4.2
Kúty-Brodské
4.4
canal
Myjava
2
Morava
71.5
7
HIROCEM, a. s. Malacky
Vajar cr.
1
76.9 Cement production heavy heating oils
18 000
2
65 own WWT
P
SE
1800000
Rohozník
2000000
6.3
Rudavka
3.5
petroleum
200
3
65.45
200000
Rudava
21.2
Morava
51.2
8
Vojenský útvar
Malacky
Pernecká Malina
4.9
48.3 Soldier
aviation petrol
1 920
3
65.45 own WWT
S
1920000
4990,
organisation
1920000
6.3
Kuchyna
Malina
32.8
Morava
10.6
9
Sky Life, s. r. o.
Malacky
Malina
26
36.6 Insulators,
phenol
290
2
24.34 WWT
S
29000
BA
conductors pr.
34800
4.5
factory in Malacky
Morava
10.6
methanol
290
1
11.39 of Strojárne, a. s.
2900
formaldehyde
290
2
23.43 Malacky
2900
10
ISTROCHEM, a. Bratislava
1863.8
0 Rubber
oil R 935
200
2
65 own WWT
P
SE
20000
s. Bratislava
accelerators
184500
5.3
production
NaOH
100
1
35
1000
Additives to
fural
100
3
12.45
100000
greases
Page 1 of 15
ARS Slovakia
Plant protection
HCl
150
1
34.37
1500
subst.
NaOCl3
200
1
31.34
2000
aniline
500
2
50
50000
NaOCl3
750
1
31.34
7500
cyclohexylamine
250
1
10.34
2500
11
SLOVNAFT, a. s. Bratislava
1863.7
0 Destilation of oil
crude oil
> 100
2
65 own WWT
P
SE
10000
Bratislava
10000
4.0
factory 31-Fuel
12
Slovenská plavba a Bratislava
1862.2
0 River transport
petroleum
1500
3
65.45 WWT of
S
1500000
prístavy,
1515000
6.2
a. s. Bratislava
waste from ships
1500
1
city Bratislava
15000
13
MATADORFIX, Bratislava
1862.2
0 Pastes, paints
toluene
175
2
11.2 WWT
P
SE
17500
product.
122500
5.1
a. s. Bratislava
technical petrol
105
3
65.45 of city Bratislava
105000
14
AssiDomän, a. s. Nové Zámky
1722
0 Paper mill
heavy heating oils
10 940
2
65 own WWT
P
SE
1094000
Stúrovo
2777000
6.4
petroleum
1 560
3
65.45
1560000
oils
1 050
2
65
105000
lye
1 800
1
34.39
18000
15
JCP IZOLÁCIE, Nové Zámky
1722
0 Electro-technical
ixide composition
7 200
2
65 WWT of
P
720000
a. s. Stúrovo
834500
5.9
industry
ixide asphalt
750
1
65 AssiDomän, a.s.
7500
primal asphalt
3200
1
65 Stúrovo
32000
heavy heating oils
750
2
65
75000
16
NAD, a. s.
Bratislava
0 National bus
petroleum
320
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
320000
Bratislava
transport
Bratislava
320000
5.5
17
Krajské policajné Bratislava
0 Car repairs
petrol
150
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
150000
riaditel stvo,
Bratislava
150000
5.2
Gastanový hájik
and maintaning
18
Kablex, s. r. o.
Bratislava
0 Electro-technical dioctylphtalate
140
1
62.63 WWT of city
P
1400
Bratislava
ind.
Bratislava
1400
3.1
19
BEZ
Bratislava
0 Production of
transform. oils
1 000
2
65 WWT of city
S
100000
TRANSFORMÁT
Bratislava
ORY,
120000
5.1
a. s. Bratislava
transformers
used transform.
200
2
65
20000
oils
20
RUDEX, s. r. o.
Bratislava
0 Bleaching clay
HCl
150
1
34.37 WWT of
S
1500
Bratislava
prod.
ISTROCHEM
1500
3.2
21
PALMA-TUMYS, Bratislava
0 Herb oils and
hexane
100
1
WWT of city
P
SE
1000
a. s.
animal
Bratislava
1000
3.0
Bratislava
fats prod.
22
DP, a. s. Jurajov
Bratislava
0 Town traffic
petroleum
250
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
250000
dvor
Bratislava
250000
5.4
23
OLO, a. s.
Bratislava
0 Incinerator of
waste
13 000
1
WWT of city
S
130000
Bratislava
Bratislava
135130
5.1
communal waste
cinder
513
1
5130
24
HCl, s. r. o.
Galanta
Storage of
mineral acids
180 t
1
34.39
S
1800
Sládkovicovo
chemicals
2800
3.4
Page 2 of 15
ARS Slovakia
inorganic salts
100 t
1
36
1000
25
Dunaj Petrol
Komárno
Trade in fuel
petroleum, petrol
1 770 t
3
65.45
S
1770000
Trade, a. s.
1770000
6.2
26
Chemolak, a. s.
Trnava
Luhový cr.
2
182.5 Paints production light heating oils
363
2
65 own WWT,
P
SE
36300
Smolenice
1219300
6.1
Trnávka
28
polish petrol
873
3
11,65,45
creek flows
873000
through
Dolný Dudváh
20.8
the dam Boleráz
Cierna voda
5.5
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
76.2
technical petrol
198
3
65.45
198000
Trnávka-2
25.8
178.3
medical toluene
329
2
11.2
32900
Dolný Dudváh
20.8
medical xylene
306
2
10,38,21
30600
Cierna voda
5.5
substance X 2003
360
2
36000
Malý Dunaj
50
substance X 247
100
2
10000
Váh
76.2
glycerine
250
1
2500
27
Malokarpatská
Pezinok
Blatina-2
3.3
162 Wood processing mazut
2 200
2
65 WWT of city
S
220000
drevárska
Pezinok
220000
5.3
Súrsky canal
15.3
fabrika, a. s.
Malý Dunaj
117.3
Váh
26.1
28
JUHOCUKOR, a. Dunajská Streda
Vojka-Kracany
1.7
68 Sugar production heavy heating oils
18 540
2
65 own WWT
S
SE
1854000
s.
can.
1854000
6.3
Gabcíkovo-
16.6
Topol níky
Klatovské rameno
4.1
Malý Dunaj
19.5
Váh
26.1
29
D-Apetit, s. r. o.
Dunajská Streda
Gabcíkovo-
11.5
61.2
heavy heating oils
1 080
2
65 WWT of city
S
108000
Dun. Streda
108000
5.0
Topol níky can.
Dunajská Streda
Klatovské rameno
4.1
Malý Dunaj
19.5
Váh
26.1
30
DRON trade, s. r. Dunajská Streda
Gabcíkovo-
11.5
61.2 Crude oil storing
petroleum
1 070
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
1070000
o.
1070000
6.0
Topol níky can.
Dunajská Streda
Klatovské rameno
4.1
Malý Dunaj
19.5
Váh
26.1
31
Hydina Danubius, Dunajská Streda
Gabcíkovo-
11.5
61.2 Poultry processing light heating oils
300
2
65 WWT of city
S
30000
s. r. o.
30000
4.5
canal
Dunajská Streda
Klatovské rameno
4.1
Malý Dunaj
19.5
Váh
26.1
Page 3 of 15
ARS Slovakia
32
MEDMILK,
Dunajská Streda
Chotárny canal
12.4
53.5 Milk processing
heavy heating oils
360
2
65 own WWT
S
36000
Vel ký Meder
48000
4.7
Malý Dunaj
14.8
mud from sewage
1 200
1
12000
Váh
26.1
33
Kafiléria, a. s.
Senec
Cierna voda
1.9
51.9 Animal waste
animal fat
160
0
WWT of city
S
160
Senec
processing
Senec
160
2.2
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
34
EBA, s. r. o.
Dunajská Streda
Belský canal
47.3 Earthy substrates compost
20 000 t
0
RKm from mouth
S
20000
Bratislava
prod.
into
25200
4.4
factory Dolný Stál
Chotárny canal
6.4
fluid part from
520
1
the Chotárny canal
5200
ferm.
Malý Dunaj
14.8
Váh
26.1
35
Trnavský
Trnava
Trnávka
13.29
115.69 Sugar mill
heavy heating oils
9 000
2
65 own WWT
S
900000
cukrovar, a. s.
1065000
6.0
Dol. Dudváh
20.8
HCl
1 500
1
34.37
15000
Cierna voda
5.5
formaldehyde
1 500
2
23.43
150000
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
36
ZEZ Tepláren
Trnava
Parná
7.2
113.6 Heating factory
heavy heating oils
4 000
2
65
S
400000
Trnava
400000
5.6
Trnávka
4
Dol. Dudváh
20.8
Cierna voda
5.5
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
37
TATRACHEMA Trnava
Trnávka-1
10.5
112.9 Flat chemistry
alcohol
180
1
11.39
S
1800
VD Trnava
production
1800
3.3
Dol. Dudváh
20.8
Cierna voda
5.5
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
38
ZOS, a. s. Trnava Trnava
Trnávka-2
9
111.4 Repairs,
mazut
3 140
2
65 WWT of city
S
SE
314000
engineering
Trnava
314000
5.5
Dol. Dudváh
20.8
Cierna voda
5.5
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
39
Skolský majetok Trnava
Trnávka-2
9
111.4 Farming
dung
4 500
1
WWT of city
S
45000
Trnava
Trnava
51700
4.7
Dol. Dudváh
20.8
dung water
670
1
6700
Cierna voda
5.5
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
40
Slovnaft Benzinol Trnava
Trnávka-2
9
111.4 Petrol station
petrol
128
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
128000
Trnava
Trnava
128000
5.1
Dol. Dudváh
20.8
Cierna voda
5.5
Page 4 of 15
ARS Slovakia
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
41
ZSR Locomotive Trnava
Parná
4.6
111 Repairs and
petroleum
300
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
300000
depot Trnava
maintaning
Trnava
300000
5.5
Trnávka
4
Dol. Dudváh
20.8
Cierna voda
5.5
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
42
SSC Trnava-
Trnava
Trnávka
8
110.4 Roads maintaning gritting salts
2 500
1
S
25000
Modranka
25000
4.4
Dol. Dudváh
20.8
Cierna voda
5.5
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
43
AE Jaslovské
Trnava
Manivier
4
107.5 Atomic power
turbine oil
> 100 t
2
65 own WWT,
S
10000
Bohunice
station
22000
4.3
Horný Dudváh
13.3
mazut
> 100 t
2
65 above dam
10000
Král ová
Váh
90.2
HCl
> 100 t
1
34.37
1000
Drahovský canal
0.4
102.2
NaOH
> 100 t
1
35
1000
Váh
101.8
44
Cukrovar a
Galanta
Dol. Dudváh
10.35
91.95 Sugar and canning 8% vinegar acid
290
1
10.35
S
2900
konzerváren
factory
2900
3.5
Sládkovicovo
Dol. Dudváh
10.2
91.8
Cierna voda
5.5
Malý Dunaj
50
Váh
26.1
45
OTF-Energia, s. r. Tvrdosín
Orava
52.3
354.1 Television
heavy heating oils
600
2
65 own WWT,
S
60000
o. Nizná
machines prod.
60000
4.8
Váh
301.8
and galvanic
above dam
Krpel any
46
AGRO-RACIO, s. Liptovský Mikulás Bobrovecký cr.
346.2 Agricultural
light heating oils
100
2
65
1
S
10000
r. o.
production,
15250
4.2
Jaslovský cr.
1.2
trade
dung water
525
1
5250
Váh
345
47
SCP, a. s.
Ruzomberok
Váh
321.5
321.5 Cellulose and
CaCO3
1 000
0
own WWT,
S
1000
Ruzomberok
paper mill
3400
3.5
divisions Suprabal,
glue
240
1
above dam
2400
Supragraf
Krpel any
48
Kovostav, a. s.
Ruzomberok
Revúca
4.2
320.8 Engineering
light heating oils
800
2
65 own WWT,
S
80000
Biely Potok
80000
4.9
Váh
316.6
above dam
Krpel any
49
SCP, a. s.
Ruzomberok
Váh
314.8
314.8 Cellulose and
NaOH
386
1
35 own WWT,
P
SE
3860
Ruzomberok
paper mill
1557060
6.2
factory CELPAP
H2SO4
100
1
35 above dam
1000
Krpel any
NaClO3
423
1
31.34
4230
heavy heating oils
12 000
2
65
1200000
black lye
7 511
1
34,35,39
75110
Page 5 of 15
ARS Slovakia
petroleum
135
3
65.45
135000
H2O2
160
1
8.34
1600
NaHSO3
166
1
22.31
1660
lime
1 460
1
41
14600
soap
120 000
0
120000
50
Druhá
Martin
Turiec
8
289.6 Engines for
engine petroleum
108
3
65.45
S
108000
Strojárenská, a. s.
agricultural
108000
5.0
Stará Turá
Váh
281.6
machines
above dam Zilina
51
SSE Tepláren
Martin
Turiec-1, Kalnô
7.8
289.4 Heating plant
Ca(OH)2
104
1
41
S
1040
Martin
3560
3.6
Váh
281.6
NaOH
126
1
35 own WWT,
1260
HCl
126
1
34.37 above dam Zilina
1260
52
ZTS TEES -
Martin
Turiec-1
4.4
286 Heavy engineering petroleum
446
3
65.45 own WWT,
S
446000
448040
5.7
Martinské
Váh
281.6
oils
204
2
65 above dam Zilina
2040
strojárne. a. s.
53
PRATEX COM, Cadca
Kysuca
29
281.3 Textile industry
Ca(OH)2
132
1
41 above dam Hricov
S
1320
a. s.
1320
3.1
Váh
252.3
54
KLF-ZVL, a. s.
Kysucké N. Mesto Neslusanka
256.7 Bearing
oils
205
2
65
S
20500
production,
380500
5.6
Kysucké Nové
Kysuca
4.4
energetics
petropal
360
3
65.45 above dam Hricov
360000
Mesto
Váh
252.3
55
SSE Tepláren
Zilina
Váh
255
255 Heating plant
HCl
160
1
34.37 own WWT,
S
1600
Zilina
2800
3.4
NaOH
120
1
35 above dam Hricov
1200
56
Aqachémia, s. r. o. Zilina
Váh
254.25
254.25 Organic, inorganic cyclohexanone
406
1
10.2 WWT of city
P
SE
4060
Zilina
Zilina,
472460
5.7
area of Pov.
production
NaOH
143
1
35 above dam Hricov
1430
chemické závody
solution KL
750
1
7500
sulphate lye
1 000
1
34,35,39
10000
NH4NO2
500
1
8,28,50
5000
hydroxylaminesulp
350
1
22.5
3500
hate
H2SO4
600
1
35
6000
oleum
600
2
14,35,37
60000
caprolactame
700
2
36,37,38
70000
acetocyanhydrine
300
3
300000
methanol
260
1
11.39
2600
methylacrylate
237
1
11.43
2370
57
Slovnaft Benzinol, Zilina
Váh
244.9
244.9 Storage and
petrol
770
3
65.45 own WWT,
S
SE
770000
a. s.
trading in fuel
2182000
6.3
Terminal Horný
Lehotský cr.
1.5
243.85
techn., aviation
800
3
65.45 above dam Hricov
800000
Hricov
petrol
Váh
242.35
light heating oils
1 620
2
65
162000
oils and greases
4 500
2
65
450000
58
Kinex, a. s. Bytca Bytca
Váh
235
235 Engineering
oils
200 t
2
65 own WWT,
S
20000
20000
4.3
Page 6 of 15
ARS Slovakia
above dam Nosice
59
Tepláren, a. s.
Povazská Bystrica Váh
217
217 Energetics
waste oils
150
2
65
S
15000
25800
4.4
used crude oil
108
2
65 disch. into dam
10800
Nosice
60
Matador, a. s.
Púchov
Pruzinka
0.03
201.73 Rubber factory
heavy heating oils
14 000
2
65 own WWT,
P
SE
1400000
Púchov
1885360
6.3
Váh
201.7
technical petrol
139
3
65.45 above dam Slnava
139000
Váh
201.7
201.7
furex
320
3
320000
HCl
136
1
34.37
1360
waste oils
250
2
65
25000
61
Povazské
Ilava
Lúckovský cr.
0.5
192 Cement production heavy heating oils
6 000
2
65 own WWT,
S
SE
600000
cementárne, a. s.
600000
5.8
Nosický canal
25.9
above dam Slnava
Váh
165.6
62
Povazský
Trencín
Nosický canal
23.5
189.1 Sugar mill
heavy heating oils
11 000
2
65 above dam Slnava
S
1100000
cukrovar, a. s.
1100000
6.0
Trencianska Teplá
Váh
165.6
63
SLOVLAK
Ilava
Podhradský cr.
3
187.5 Inorganic
xylene
120
2
10.38 own WWT,
P
12000
FALA, a. s.
pigments,
Koseca
24000
4.4
Váh
184.5
paints prod.
aromatol
120
2
above dam Slnava
12000
64
ZTS Energo, a. s. Ilava
Lieskovecký cr.
1.8
165.6 Engineering,
used oils
160
2
65 2, above dam
S
16000
Dubnica
Slnava,
16000
4.2
energy production
own WWT
65
ZTS Metalurgia, a. Ilava
Lieskovecký cr.
1.8
165.6 Metallurgy
tempered oils
400
2
65 WWT of ZTS
S
40000
s.
Energo,
41200
4.6
Dubnica nad
water glass
120
1
above dam Slnava
1200
Váhom
66
Agrokombinát, a. Trencín
Biskupický canal
7.25
127.65 Breeding of pigs
dung water
7 500
1
own WWT,
S
75000
s.
75000
4.9
Vel ké Bierovce
Váh
120.4
above dam Slnava
67
Farm Chtelnica
Piest any
Chtelnicka
12.67
121.37 Farming
petroleum
240
3
65.45 WWT of mun.
S
240000
336800
5.5
Horný Dudváh
18.5
dung
9 000
1
Chtelnica,
90000
Váh
90.2
dung water
680
1
above dam Slnava
6800
68
Pol nohosp. výroba Piest any
Steruský cr.
6.5
119.6 Farming
solid fuel
1 000 t
2
above dam Slnava
S
100000
a obchodné
114400
5.1
druzstvo Kocín
Borovský canal
4.2
silage
100
1
1000
Horný Dudváh
18.7
dibutylphtalate
134
2
63,50,53
13400
Váh
90.2
69
Drôtovna, a. s.
Hlohovec
Váh
100.8
100.8 Wire production
mazut
5450 t
2
65 own WWT,
P
SE
545000
Hlohovec
548200
5.7
HCl
320
1
34.37 above dam Slnava
3200
70
Slovakofarma, a. s. Hlohovec
Váh
100.65
100.65 Drugs production 28% NH4OH
160
2
10.38 own WWT,
P
SE
16000
Hlohovec
16000
4.2
above dam Slnava
71
Hornonitrianske
Prievidza
Krivý cr.
3.8
172.3 Coal mining
petrol
100
3
65.45 own WWT
S
100000
bane, a. s.
245000
5.4
Page 7 of 15
ARS Slovakia
factory Bana
Cigliansky cr.
2.8
petroleum
100
3
65.45
100000
Cígel ,
o. z. Prievidza
Lehotský cr.
3.3
oils
450
2
65
45000
Nitra
132.3
Váh
30.1
Mostenica
2.3
173.7
Handlovka
5.7
Nitra
135.6
Váh
30.1
Ciglianka
1.5
168.5
Handlovka
1.3
Nitra
135.6
Váh
30.1
72
Hornonitrianske
Prievidza
Lehotský cr.
5.7
168.1 Coal mining
petroleum
100
3
65.45 above dam
S
100000
bane Nováky,
Nováky
100000
5.0
factory Bana
Nitra
132.3
Lehota
Váh
30.1
73
Hornonitrianske
Prievidza
Lehotský cr.
1.7
164.1 Coal mining
petroleum
100
3
65.45 own WWT,
S
100000
bane Nováky,
100000
5.0
factory Bana
Nitra
132.3
above dam
Mládeze
Nováky
Váh
30.1
74
SAD, Prievidza
Prievidza
Handlovka
4.8
170.5 National bus
petroleum
200
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
200000
transport
Prievidza
200000
5.3
Nitra
135.6
Váh
30.1
75
Hornonitrianske
Prievidza
Ciglianka
2.4
169.4 Coal mining
petroleum
100
3
65.45
S
100000
bane Nováky,
100000
5.0
factory Bana
Handlovka
1.3
Nováky
Nitra
135.6
Váh
30.1
76
Novácke chemické Prievidza
Nitra
130.6
160.7 Chemical industry dioctyladipate
120
1
36 own WWT
P
SE
1200
závody,
3058650
6.5
a.s., Nováky
Nitra
129.7
159.8
diisooctylphtalate
240
1
62,63,58
2400
Váh
30.1
1,2
3 000
3
40
3000000
(dichloro)ethane
methanol
143
1
11.39
1430
vinylacetate
327
2
11
32700
emulgator
444
1
4440
Fe2(SO4)3
112
1
1120
CaCl2
146
1
36
1460
cooling oils
139
2
65
13900
77
SE, a. s. Nováky Prievidza
Nitra
126
156.1 Heat and
petroleum
10 000
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
SE
10000000
10174400
7.0
factory Zemianske
Váh
30.1
electricity
turbine oils
219
2
65 Z. Kostol any
21900
Kostol any
production
mazut
1 525
2
65
152500
78
VEGUM, a. s.
Prievidza
Nitrica
12
153.9 Rubber industry
dibutylphtalate
300
2
63,50,53
own WWT
P
30000
40000
4.6
Page 8 of 15
ARS Slovakia
Dolné Vestenice
Nitra
111.8
oils
100
2
65
10000
Váh
30.1
79
Zornica, s. p.
Bánovce
Radisa
2.3
148.7 Textile, fashion
heavy heating oils
720
2
65
S
72000
industry
72000
4.9
n/Bebravou
Bebrava
18
Nitra
98.3
Váh
30.1
80
Cebo Holding
Partizánske
Nitra
111.2
141.3 Shoes, leather
technical petrol
140
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
140000
Slovakia a. s.,
industry
151200
5.2
Partizánske
Váh
30.1
oils
100
2
65 Partizánske
10000
dioctyladenylate
120
1200
81
Pol nosluzby
Bánovce
Bebrava
12.5
140.9 Agricultural
engine petroleum
200
3
65.45
S
200000
BEBRAVA, a. s.
production
200000
5.3
Rybany
n/Bebravou
Nitra
98.3
trade
Váh
30.1
82
Skolský majetok Topol cany
Chotina
4.5
128.6 School farm
solid fuel
700 t
1
S
7000
Tovarníky
12000
4.1
Nitra
94
dung water
500
1
5000
Váh
30.1
83
Novpol, a. s.
Topol cany
Radosinka
19
115.4 Agricultural
light heating oils
150
2
65 above dam
S
15000
Vel ké Ripnany
product., trade
15000
4.2
Nitra
66.3
Vel ké Ripnany
Váh
30.1
84
Pol nonákup a. s. Nitra
Nitra
85
115.1 Agricultural
light heating oils
100
2
65
S
10000
Luzianky
product., trade
10000
4.0
Váh
30.1
85
Slovnaft Benzinol, Trnava
Andac
13.5
114.4 Storage and trade petrol
14 030
3
65.45 WWT of mun.
S
SE
14030000
in fuel
Kl acany
24339000
7.4
Kl acany pri
Radosinka
4.6
petroleum
9 275
3
65.45
9275000
Trnave
Nitra
66.2
crude oil
10 340
2
65
1034000
Váh
30.1
86
ZSR Zlaté
Zlaté Moravce
Hostiansky cr.
5.5
101.6 Engineering
engine petroleum
225
3
65.45
S
225000
Moravce
225000
5.4
Engineering station
Zitava
40.5
Nitra
25.5
Váh
30.1
87
NITRAFROST, a. Nitra
Nitra
53.5
83.5 Food industry
NaCl
100
1
S
SE
1000
s.
11000
4.0
Váh
30.1
NH3
100
2
10.5
10000
88
AGROMILK, a. s. Nitra
Nitra-1
52.5
82.6 Milk processing
heavy heating oils
630
2
65
S
63000
63000
4.8
Váh
30.1
89
Plastika, a. s. Nitra Nitra
Malá Nitra
28.1
80.8 Production of
mazut
3 000
2
65 own WWT
P
300000
plastics
301300
5.5
Nitra
22.6
HCl
130
1
34.37
1300
Váh
30.1
90
Nitrianske
Nitra
Malá Nitra
28
80.7 Engineering
heavy heating oils
1 080
2
65 own WWT
S
108000
strojárne Nitra
108000
5.0
Page 9 of 15
ARS Slovakia
Nitra
22.6
Váh
30.1
91
HIRK, s. r. o.
Galanta
Váh
78.99
78.99 Nickel works
engine petroleum
100
3
65.45 can. of Cukrov.
P
100000
Sered
Sládkov.
100000
5.0
92
PAL-INALFA, a. Nitra
Host ovský cr.
1.1
78.5 Electrical
crude oil
100 t
2
65 own WWT
S
10000
s. Vráble
machines prod.
substances
10000
4.0
Zitava
22
Nitra
25.5
Váh
30.1
93
Farm Komjatice
Nové Zámky
Malá Nitra
14
66.7 Farming
dung water
1 445
1
S
14450
14450
4.2
Nitra
22.6
Váh
30.1
94
Zlatý Bazant, a.s. Nové Zámky
Stará Zitava
4.8
62.6 Brewery
engine petroleum
100
3
65.45 own WWT
S
100000
Hurbanovo
100000
5.0
Zitava
2.2
Nitra
25.5
Váh
30.1
95
Duslo Sal a, a. s. Sal a
Váh
53.9
53.9 Chemical industry HCl
263
1
34.37 own WWT
P
SE
2630
476630
5.7
H2SO4
320
1
35
3200
NaOH
480
1
35
4800
KOH
100
1
22.35
1000
NaNO2
320
2
8,25,50
32000
CCl4
152
3
23.51
152000
Fe(NO3 )3
1 500
1
15000
ammonium water
160
2
10.5
16000
greases
2 000
2
65
200000
aniline
500
2
20,25,50
50000
96
Farm Vel ký Kýr
Nové Zámky
Stará Nitra
17
53.7 Farming
dung water
915
1
S
9150
100150
5.0
Nitra
6.6
dung
9 000
1
90000
Váh
30.1
silage
100
1
1000
97
Elektrosvit, a. s.
Nové Zámky
Nitra
8.8
38.9
heavy heating oils
4 000
2
65 WWT of city
P
400000
Nové Zámky
3620000
6.6
Váh
30.1
petrol
1 610
3
65.45 Nové Zámky
1610000
petroleum
1 610
3
65.45
1610000
98
ZSR Locomotive Nové Zámky
Nitra
8.8
38.9 Repairs and
engine petroleum
630
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
630000
depot
maintaning
652000
5.8
Váh
30.1
of locomotives
oils
220
2
65 Nové Zámky
22000
99
Sajgal s. r.o.,
Brezno
Hron
226.8
226.8 Distribution of fuel petrol
133
3
65.45
S
133000
Brezno
133000
5.1
100
SAD, s. p. Brezno Brezno
Drábsko
2.1
223.8 Slovak bus
engine petroleum
200
3
65.45 own WWT
S
200000
transport
200000
5.3
Hron
221.7
101
ZSR Zvolen
Brezno
Hron
220.5
220.5 Repairs of
petroleum
100
3
65.45
S
100000
locomotives
100000
5.0
division Brezno
Hron
214.2
102
UNI, s. r. o.
Brezno
Bystrianka
1.7
215.9 Fuel storage
petroleum
820
3
65.45
S
820000
Brezno
820000
5.9
Store Piesok
Hron
214.2
Page 10 of 15
ARS Slovakia
103
Petrochema, a. s. Brezno
Oselné cr.
205.7 Refinery
crude oil
9 572
2
65 own WWT,
P
SE
957200
Dubová
12181740
7.1
Hron
205.7
refine oils
2 309
2
65 river km
230900
heating oils
4 500
2
65 from the mouth
450000
oleum
105
2
14,35,37
into the Hron river
10500
dark oils
900
2
65
90000
white oils
1 175
2
65
117500
light heating oils
815
2
65
81500
traf. and cond. oils
1 229
2
65
122900
low-solidifying oils
510
2
65
51000
emulsion oils
272
2
65
27200
waste oils
2 011
2
65
201100
petrosulphonates
475
2
65
47500
petropal
260
2
65
26000
petrol
3 905
3
65.45
3905000
H2SO4
220
1
35
2200
techn. HCl
325
1
34.37
3250
NaOH
199
1
35
1990
oth. basic raw
1 273
2
127300
materials
dunon
290
2
29000
dubacid
187
2
18700
benzene
1 201
3
11,23,65
1201000
petroleum + gas
752
3
65.45
752000
destill. prod.
petroleum +
3 500
3
65.45
3500000
components
n-alkanes
2 280
2
65
228000
104
Neuber-Chemika, Banská Bystrica
Hron
185.8
185.8 Chemical industry H2SO4
300 t
1
35 canalization
S
3000
a. s.
4000
3.6
Slovenská Lupca
Hron
185.4
185.4
KH2PO4
100 t
1
of Slovenská
1000
Lupca
105
BIOTIKA, a. s.
Banská Bystrica
Istebník
0.5
183.8 Drugs production NaOH
137
1
35 own WWT
P
SE
1370
407870
5.6
Slovenská Lupca
Hron
183.3
buthylacetate
550
1
10.66
5500
buthanol
100
1
10,22,38
1000
heavy heating oils
4 000
2
65
400000
106
Stavby-
Banská Bystrica
Selciansky cr.
2.2
181.2 Building,
petroleum
100
3
65.45 own WWT
S
100000
mechanizácia-
mechanization,
dopr.
100000
5.0
a. s., Nemce
Hron
179
transport
107
SAD BBDS, s. p. Banská Bystrica
Selciansky cr.
1.25
180.25 Public traffic
petroleum
200
3
65.45 own WWT
S
200000
200000
5.3
Hron
179
108
Slovenské
Banská Bystrica
Selciansky cr.
1.2
180.2 Cement production mazut
5 000
2
65 own WWT
P
500000
cementárne
500000
5.7
Hron
179
Page 11 of 15
ARS Slovakia
109
Slovnaft Benzinol Detva
Slatina-1
24.55
178.05 Storage, trade in
petrol
8 230
3
65.45 own WWT
S
SE
8230000
Stozok
fuel
16143000
7.2
Hron
153.5
engine petroleum
7 586
3
65.45
7586000
transmission oils
2 004
2
65
200400
used crude oils
100
2
65
10000
light heating oils
1 166
2
65
116600
110
Podpolianske
Detva
Hradná
1.6
176.5 Engineering
inorganic oils
148 t
2
65 own WWT,
S
14800
strojárne
14800
4.2
DETVA Holding,
Slatina-1
21.4
above dam
a. s.
Môt ová
Hron
153.5
111
Slovenka, s. p.
Banská Bystrica
Bystrica-1
0.9
176.3 Cotton processing heavy heating oils
1 600
2
65 own WWT
S
160000
160000
5.2
Hron
175.4
112
Slovenská správa Zvolen
Hron
164.4
164.4 Personal and
aviation petroleum
116
3
65.45 own WWT
S
116000
letísk
116000
5.1
airport Sliac
cargo transport
113
ZOS, a. s. Zvolen Zvolen
Slatina-1
4
157.5 Repairs,
heavy heating oils
183
2
65
S
18300
engineering
538300
5.7
Hron
153.5
engine petroleum
504
3
65.45
504000
engine oils
160
2
65
16000
114
ZSR, a. s. Zvolen Zvolen
Slatina-1
0.2
153.7 Repairs of
engine petroleum
2 933
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
2933000
locomotives
Zvolen
3005400
6.5
Locomotives depot
Hron
153.5
mazut
180
2
65
18000
crude oil
379
2
65
37900
engine oils
165
2
65
16500
115
BUCINA, a. s.
Zvolen
Zolná
1.5
158.5 Wood processing modificator
7 000
1
P
SE
70000
Zvolen
76085
4.9
1.1
158.1
stiffener R 60
135
1
1350
1
158
paste LP
460
1
4600
0.66
157.66
paraffin
135
0
135
0.63
157.63
0.6
157.6
Slatina-1
3.5
Hron
153.5
Slatina
3
156.5
Hron
153.5
Hron
153.8
153.8
116
SEZ, s.p. Zilina
Zvolen
Hron
Heating plant
heavy heating oils
1 800
2
65 canalization of
S
180000
Bucina
182500
5.3
factory Tepláren
Slatina
NaOH
110
1
35
1100
Zvolen
Zolná
HCl
140
1
34.37
1400
117
SAD, s. p. Zvolen Zvolen
Hron
154.26
154.26 Transp., repairs of petroleum
200
3
65.45
S
200000
buses
200000
5.3
118
VD Kovohron
Zvolen
Hron
153.5
153.5 Steel, plates
light heating oils
200
2
65 WWT of city
P
20000
Zvolen
processing
Zvolen
20000
4.3
119
Elba, a. s.
Ziar nad Hronom Kremnický cr.
15
150.5 Armatures,
HCl
105
1
34.37
P
SE
1050
Kremnica
fixtures prod.
1050
3.0
Page 12 of 15
ARS Slovakia
Hron
135.5
120
KBS, s. r. o.
Ziar nad Hronom Kremnický cr.
14
149.5 Ores proces.,
CN solutions
550
2
26,28,32
P
55000
Kremnica
electr. prod.
55000
4.7
Hron
135.5
121
Závod SNP, a. s.
Ziar nad Hronom Hron
129
129 Aluminium
NaOH
1 825
1
35
P
SE
18250
processing
84650
4.9
Hron
125.3
125.3
inorganic oils
664
2
65
66400
122
de Miclén Levice Levice
Cosmetics
KOH
105
1
22.35 WWT of city
S
1050
production
Levice
1050
3.0
123
A. N. B., s. r. o.
Zarnovica
Hron
108.35
108.35 Wood processing heavy heating oils
2 883 t
2
65
P
288300
Bratislava
303829
5.5
factory Zarnovica
paste MF
669,1 t
1
6691
paste FFD
883,8 t
1
8838
124
IZOMAT, a. s.
Zarnovica
Novobanský cr.
0.5
94.3 Isolating materials phenolphormaldeh
125
2
43 own WWT
P
12500
Nová Bana
yde
12500
4.1
Hron
93.8
production
resin
1
Hron
93.45
93.45
125
AE Mochovce
Levice
Hron
93.95
93.95 Atomic power
petroleum
200
3
65.45 own WWT
S
200000
station
206260
5.3
municipality
H2SO4
180
1
35
1800
Vel ké
NaOH
160
1
35
1600
Kozmálovce
Fe2(SO4)3
160
1
1600
HNO3
126
1
8.35
1260
126
Slovnaft Benzinol, Zarnovica
Hron
82.3
82.3 Fuel storage
engine petroleum
11 700
3
65.45
S
SE
11700000
a. s.
22254000
7.3
PS Hronský
light heating oils
800
2
65
80000
Benadik
car and aviation
10 464
3
65.45
10464000
petrol
used crude oils
100
2
65
10000
127
NOVOCHEMA Levice
Podluzianka
2.2
55.95 Paints, non-
polish petrol
125
3
11,65,45
WWT of city
P
SE
125000
Levice
freezing liquids,
Levice
145000
5.2
Hron
53.75
thinners,
xylene
100
2
10,21,38
10000
dispersive pastes
polishes
100
2
65
10000
128
Slovmag, a. s.
Lucenec
Krivánsky cr.
21.1
160.8 Mining
heavy heating oils
650
2
65 own WWT
S
65000
Lovinobana
92800
5.0
Krivánsky cr.
19.5
159.2
sulphite extract
128
2
31.34
12800
Ipel
139.7
tar
150
2
65
15000
129
Ziaromat Kalinovo Poltár
Slatinka
12.7
153 Ceramic industry light heating oils
100
2
65 own WWT
S
10000
10000
4.0
Krivánsky cr.
0.6
Ipel
139.7
130
SAP, s.p. Lucenec Lucenec
Krivánsky cr.
4.4
144.1
petroleum
150
3
65.45 WWT of city
S
150000
Lucenec
150000
5.2
Ipel
139.7
131
VÚ Lest ,
Krupina
Krupinica
57.6
111.7 Soldier
petroleum
188
3
65.45
S
188000
Pliesovce
organisation
188000
5.3
Ipel
54.1
132
ACHP, s. r. o.
Vel ký Krtís
Medokýsny cr.
2.1
106.3 Agrochemistry
fluid fertilisers
1 920
1
S
19200
Vel ký Krtís
19200
4.3
Krtís
14.1
Ipel
90.1
Page 13 of 15
ARS Slovakia
133
Pol nonákup
Krupina
Stiavnica
29.5
76.9 Trade, drying,
light heating oils
300
2
65
S
30000
HONT, a.s .
treating,
30000
4.5
Hontianske Nemce
Ipel
47.5
storage of grain
134
Transpetrol, a. s. Levice
Stiavnica
2.6
50.1 Transport, storage crude oil
180 000
2
65 own WWT
S
18000000
Sahy
of
18000000
7.3
municipality Tupá
Ipel
47
crude oil and c. o.
products
135
Zelba s.p. 02
Roznava
Slaná
66.4
66.4 Siderite mining
As 0,144%
3 984 911
1
23.25
S
39849110
Siderit
39849110
7.6
Nizná Slaná
and processing
Pb 0,009%
silted sludge
1
20,33,61
Zn 0,004%
1
15.17
in sludge
136
Magnetech
Rimavská
Rimava
64.3
65.7 Production of non - HCl
756 m3
1
34.37
P
SE
7560
fe-
15760
4.2
Slovakia a.s.
Sobota
Slaná
1.4
rrous clinkers
Cl2
80 m3
2
23,37,50
8000
Hnúst a
NaOH
20 m3
1
35
200
137
Slovmag a.s.
Revúca
Murán
26.5
52.3 Mining and
sulfid
3 300 t
2
P
330000
Lubeník
processing
375955
5.6
Slaná
25.8
of magnesite on
light heat. oil
120 t
2
65
12000
dead -
burned magnezia mineral oil
317 t
2
65
31700
H2SO4
225,5 t
1
35
2255
138
SMZ Jelsava
Revúca
Murán
23.3
49.1 Mining and
heavy heat. oil
6 000
2
65
P
SE
600000
processing
610000
5.8
Slaná
25.8
of magnesite on
light heat. oil
100
2
65
10000
dead -
burned magnezia
139
SLZ Chémia a.s. Rimavská
Rimava
59
60.4 Production of
acetone
204
1
11
P
SE
2040
Hnúst a
coal,
220840
5.3
Sobota
Slaná
1.4
acetone,
acetic acid
273
1
10.35
2730
acetate, acetic acid methylacetate
108
1
36.11
1080
butylacetate
234
1
10
2340
tar
204
3
204000
wood vinegar
865
1
8650
140
Zelba Rudnany
Kosice
Rudniansky
0.6
122.1 Mining and
oils and fats
21,62 t
2
65
S
2162
creek
processing
3582
3.6
Hornád
121.5
of baryte ore,
H2SO4
41,77 t
1
35
418
oleic acid
50,24 t
1
502
polyethylene glycol
4,75 t
1
48
NaOH
4,15 t
1
35
42
praestol
0,55 t
hexametaphosphat
4,1 t
2
410
e
141
Vitrum
Spisská Nová Ves Hornád
97.8
97.8 mettalurgical
oils
1,1 t
2
65
S
110
Krompachy
industry
170
2.2
H2SO4
1 t
1
35
10
lime
5 t
1
50
Page 14 of 15
ARS Slovakia
142
VSZ Ferroenergy Kosice
Sokoliansky c.
8.5
8.5 Waste waters
waste oil
2
65
P
Kosice
substances
treatment plant
from
the factory VSZ
143
Chirana - Prema
Humenné
Laborec
66
90.2 Health equipments
S
Humenné
Latorica
9.2
no actual information
Bodrog
15
available
144
Chemko Strázske Michalovce
Laborec
53.9
78.1 Products of
nitric acid
24 350 t
1
8.35
P
SE
243500
inorganic,
16577450
7.2
Latorica
9.2
organic, small-
formaldehyde
146 802 t
2
23.43
14680200
assembly
Bodrog
15
chemistry,
cyclohexanone
75 656 t
1
10.2
756560
technical gases
nitre
20 250 t
1
202500
methanol
69 469 t
1
11,23,25
694690
145
SE a.s. EVO
Michalovce
Laborec
10.5
34.7 Heat and
residual oil
150 000 t
2
65
S
SE
15000000
Vojany
electricity energy
15000000
7.2
Latorica
9.2
production
Bodrog
15
146
SWS Vojany
Bardejov
Laborec
10.5
34.7 Chemical industry liquid gases
53 331 t
2
12
S
SE
5333100
oil
25350500
7.4
Latorica
9.2
products, chemical gasoline
12 300 t
3
65.45
12300000
and
Bodrog
15
other substrates,
heating oil
38 423 t
2
65
3842300
stocking
and distribution
mineral oil
38 751 t
2
65
3875100
147
Tesla Stropkov
Bardejov
Ondava
101
116 Electro -technical NaOH
25 t
1
35
S
250
7540
3.9
Bodrog
15
industry
Na 2S2O3
7 t
1
70
Syngal Zn
2 t
1
15.17
20
trichloroethylene
7,2 t
3
7200
148
Bukocel Hencovce Vranov
Ondava
50.1
65.1 Fibre and cellulose HCl
290 t
1
34.37
P
SE
2900
906680
6.0
nad Topl ou
Bodrog
15
production,
NaOH
518 t
1
35
5180
derivatives
Ca(OH)2
1 040 t
1
35
10400
products
on base of
FeCl3
178 t
1
1780
cellulose
and hydrolysate
NaCl
132 t
1
1320
heating oil
8 851 t
2
35
885100
* to boundary the Slovak Republic and Hungary
Summe
250877521
8.4
Page 15 of 15
ARS Hungary
ARS Hungary
A.) Industry - POTENTIAL ACCIDENTAL RISK SPOTS > TISA < RIVER SUB-BASIN 2001.
EOV coordinates
Sum of water risk
Water risk
No
Name and proprietor of the company
Place, settlement
Receiving watercources (km)
Activity of the company (type of technology)
X
Y
class equivalents
index
AES Borsodi Energetikai KFT Tiszapalkonyai Hoeromu Proprietor:
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 483
Production of electric energy and heat
51.
148,000,000
8.170
Akzo Nobel Festékgyártó és Kereskedelmi Rt.
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 484
Storage of materials, production and trade of resins,
52.
118,105,000
8.072
paints, lacquers, solvents
27.
Mol Rt. - Szajol basic site
Szajol
201.000
744.000
Holt-Tisa (10) - Tisa (337)
Storage of fuel, receipt of use-up oil
95,290,000
7.979
53.
MOL Rt. Tiszai Finomító
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 483+600
Refining crude oil Storage
30,415,500
7.483
AES Tisza eromu KFT Proprietor: AES SUMMIT Generation Ltd.
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 490
Production of electric energy, gas fuelled power plant
55.
26,052,030
7.416
MOL RT. BÁZISTELEP Kenoanyag üzletág
Nyírbogdány, Gyártelep
862.030
307.420 Lónyay canal (34), Tisa river (559)
receiving and storing products of crude oil arriving
19.
through pipeline (petrol, gasoline) and drawing off into
20,400,000
7.310
railway and for public road transport
18.
MOL Rt Kenoanyag division
Nyírbogdány
862.030
307.420
Lónyai canal Tisa river
storage of hazardous wastes
19,028,900
7.279
48.
Koolajtároló Rt.
Tiszaújváros MOL Rt. Tiszai Finomító
Tisa 483+600
Storage
13,600,000
7.134
AKZO NOBEL Festékgyártó és kereskedelmi Rt
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 484
Storage of materials, production and trade of resins,
58.
13,000,000
7.114
paints, lacquers, solvents
49.
Terméktároló Rt.
Tiszaújváros MOL Rt. Tiszai Finomító
Tisa 483+600
Storage
9,200,000
6.964
AES Borsodi Energetikai KFT Tiszapalkonyai Hoeromu Proprietor:
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 483
Production of electric energy and heat
56.
8,024,200
6.904
Sugar factory Rt. Begin-Say French proprietor
Szolnok
200.000
735.000
Tisa (332)
production, of sugar storage of industrial waste water
36.
7,000,000
6.845
Tiszai Vegyi Kombinát Rt. Proprietor: Befektetoi csoport
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 484
Production of olefin
46.
6,778,400
6.831
MOL RT. KFÜ pumping site
Fényeslitke
878.822
329.465
Belfo canal (43), Tisa river (569)
Receiving crude oil coming through the BARÁTSÁG-II
pipeline and storing in 4 pieces of 20000 thousands m3
6.
4,480,000
6.651
tanks above the surface then transporting to be
processed
Szerencsi Cukorgyár Rt Proprietor: Beghin Say
Szerencs
Szerencs-brook 25,5 Sajó 9,3-
Sugar beet processing, sugar production
32.
4,054,000
6.608
Tisa 491,9
42.
Terszol Szövet-kezet
Szolnok
201.000
733.000
Görbe-watercourse (1)
Galvanic and paint sludge
2,527,000
6.403
57.
Tiszai Vegyi Kombinát Rt
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 484
2,175,000
6.337
VÁROSÜZEMELTETÉSI KHT.
Nyíregyháza, Szállási u. 72.
850.813
296.037 VIII/1. tributary (11), VIII. sz. main Closed building with proper protection for collecting and
20.
river (5), Lónyay c (22), Tisa
storing hazardous wastes
1,485,400
6.172
(559)
Mol Rt. BFL Logisztika
Füzesabony
Eger-brook 25, Kis- Tisa
Storing and selling mineral oil products
7.
1,145,000
6.059
25,8
NYÍREGYHÁZI EROMU KFT.
Nyíregyháza, Bethlen G. u. 92.
850.813
296.037
VIII/2. tributary (4), VIII.main river Production of electric energy and hot steam using natural
21.
(11), Lónyay c. (22), Tisa (559)
gas and oil
1,100,000
6.041
9.
Firm: MÁD-OIL Raktározási és Szállítási Kft.
Mád
Mádi-brook 8,1 Takta 29,8
Storage and trading of mineral oil products
1,073,900
6.031
TARTALÉK-GAZDÁLKODÁSI KÖZHASZNÚ TÁRSASÁG
Nyírbátor
Nyírbátor-Vasvári canal (16)
storage of fuel
16.
1,000,000
6.000
Kraszna (34) Tisa 682
Columbian Tiszai Korom-gyártó KFT Proprietor: Columbian
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 484
Production industrial soot of oil
54.
520,000
5.716
Chemikal Company USA
38.
TVM Rt.
Szolnok
199.000
733.000
Tisa (330)
Production of fertilisers, phosphor, paint
514,250
5.711
NYÍRSÉGVÍZ RT. Nyíregyháza I. sz. site for sewage treatment
Nyíregyháza, Westsik V. u.
850.813
296.037
VIII. sz. main river (9), Lónyay
treatment of municipal sewage after weighting, then
25.
canal (22), Tisa river (559)
filtering and sand trap to DOR type deposit then airing
300,000
5.477
and another DOR type depositor
59.
MOL Rt Tiszai Finomító
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 483-600
Treatment of industrial waste water
300,000
5.477
MÁV ZÁHONY PORT Division
Komoró drawing-off oil 070 site number
880.061
333.181
Belfo canal (45), Tisa river (569)
Drawing-off pakura and gasoline from wide-track tanks
7.
250,000
5.398
into tanks with normal gauge
2.
Firm:STRONG és MIBET Építo-elemgyár Kft.
Alsózsolca
Sajó 45, Tisa 491,9
231,000
5.364
37.
Treatment plant for municipal sewage Proprietor Munici-pality
Szolnok
201.000
735.000
Tisa (332)
Treatment of municipal sewage
225,400
5.353
MÁV DEBRECENI ÜZLETIGAZGATÓSÁG SZERTÁRFONÖKSÉG Mátészalka, Zöldfa u. 102.
895.501
296.69
Kraszna river (20)
storage of fuel
13.
154,200
5.188
Tisa river (682)
Page 1 of 7
ARS Hungary
MÁV DEBRECENI ÜZLETIGAZGATÓSÁG NYÍREGYHÁZI
Nyíregyháza, Kinizsi u.
VIII/2. tributary (4) VIII. main river
storage of fuel
23.
SZERTÁRFONÖKSÉG
(11) Lónyay c (22) Tisa (559)
147,100
5.168
Rethmann Rt.
Szolnok
206.000
734.000
Kisgyepi (8,2) Zagyva (7)Tisa
Communal service, receipt of hazardous wastes
41.
143,000
5.155
(335)
60.
CLAAS Hungária Kft. German property
Törökszentmiklós
203.000
755.000
Public sewerage
Production of agricultural machinery
140,000
5.146
11.
Legero Tisza Cipogyár-tó Kft. Italian proprietor
Martfu
187.000
744.000
Tisa (305)
Production of shoes
115,000
5.061
MÁV ZÁHONY PORT ÜZELETIGAZGATÓSÁG
Eperjeske
886.748
338.509
Belfo canal (51) Tisa
storage of fuel
4.
105,000
5.021
SZERTÁRFONÖKSÉG
river (569)
MÁV ZÁHONY PORT ÜZELET-IGAZGATÓSÁG
Záhony
884.127
344.953
Belfo canal (57)
storage of fuel
61.
104,500
5.019
SZERTÁRFONÖKSÉG
Tisa river (569)
MÁV ZÁHONY PORT ÜZELETIGAZGATÓSÁG
Fényeslitke
878.822
329.465
Belfo canal (43) Tisa
storage of fuel
5.
100,000
5.000
SZERTÁRFONÖKSÉG
river (569)
Magyar Honvédség
Szolnok Repülotér
199,000
740,000
Alcsi Holt-Tisa (5 km) Tisa
Operation of military vehicles in air and on the land
39.
100,000
5.000
(337+200 km)
26.
MVM Rt - GTER KFT Proprietor:MVM Rt
Sajószöged
Sajó 23, Tisa 491,9
Gas-turbine with fast starting
97,000
4.987
1.
MOL Rt. Kut. Term. Ág. Kutatás-1 Iroda
Algyo
738
111
Tisa 187,85
Mining
77250
4.888
CEREOL NÖVÉNYOLAJIPARI RT.
Nyírbátor, Táncsics u. 2-4.
882.459
283.179
Nyírbátor-Vasvári canal (16), Production of vegetable oil (production of raw oil, refining
17.
Kraszna (34), Tisa (682)
and packaging Production of fodder for animals out of
64,000
4.806
the side products
Szarvasi Vas-Fémipari Rt.
Szarvas
768399
172086
Rainfall canal, Szarvas-
production of metal goods
28.
Békésszent-andrási-dead channel
44,000
4.643
50.
MOL Tiszai Finomító
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 483-600
Waste manage-ment
40,000
4.602
Mezogép Rt. Centre
Szolnok
201.000
731.000
Public sewerage. Tisa (332)
Production of agricultural machinery Painting
34.
28,000
4.447
43.
KGYV-Dunaferr Steel Factory Co.
Tápiószele, Györgyei street 14.
Tápió Zagyva 30,5 Tisa 335,5
Energy production
22,300
4.348
40.
Holland Colors Kft. - Dutch property
Szolnok
199.000
733.000
Tisa (330)
Production of paint
21,400
4.330
Metallo-globus Rt.
Tarnaszen-miklós
243.000
750.000
Hanyi-water course (10) Tisa
Dismantling accumulators Trade of wastes
44.
21,200
4.326
(387)
12.
Tisza Cipogyártó Kft.
Martfu
187.000
744.000
Tisa (305)
Production of shoes
18,000
4.255
TAURUS MG.ABRONCS
Nyíregyháza, Derkovits u. 137.
850.813
296.037
VIII/2. tributary (4), VIII.main river
production of tyres for agriculture (using sot from the
22.
(11), Lónyay c. (22), Tisa (559)
industry and synthetik rubbert, sulphur)
18,000
4.255
SZABOLCS VOLÁN RT.
Nyíregyháza, Korányi F. u. 12.
850.813
296.037
VIII. sz. main river (10)
storage of fuel
24.
Lónyay canal (22)
16,500
4.217
Tisa river (559)
47.
Ecomissio KFT. Proprietor: TVK Rt
Tiszaújváros
Tisa 484
Combustion of hazardous wastes
15,000
4.176
Rethmann Rt.
Szolnok
206.000
734.000
Kisgyepi (8,2)Zagyva (7) Tisa
Communal service, receipt of hazardous wastes
35.
13,000
4.114
(335)
10.
CEREOL Rt. French proprietor.
Martfu
188.000
745.000
Tisa (308)
Production of vegetable oil, pressing, refining
11,100
4.045
8.
PANNÓNIA Rt. F.a. Hungarian proprietor.
Kunszent-márton
167.000
743.000
Körös (18) Tisa (244)
Tanning in fur industry
11,000
4.041
Dispomedicor Rt.
Egyek-Félhalom
Tisafüred canal ( 13) Tisa 430,5
Production of medical instruments
3.
10,000
4.000
Zsigmondi Béla Viziközmuveket üzemelteto Rt.
Hódmezová-sárhely
749.000
118.000
Hódtó-KisTisai canal 15,43 Tisa
waste water treatment plant
8.
10,000
4.000
185,66
Bácsvíz Rt.
Kecskemét
701.000
163.000
Csukás watercourse 44,677 Tisa
waste water treatment plant
9.
10,000
4.000
227,11
29.
Jász-Plasztik Kft.
Szászberek
220.000
729.000
Zagyva (27) Tisa (335)
Production of accumulators
10,000
4.000
30.
Szegedi Vízmu Kft
Szeged
731
93
Tisa 168,36
waste water treatment plant
10,000
4.000
31.
Szentes-Víz Kft.
Szentes
745
142
Tisa 231,515
waste water treatment plant
10,000
4.000
Dac-Car Kft.
Szolnok
206.000
734.000
K-3 (1) Kisgyepi (1,5) Zagyva (6)
Receipt of hazardous wastes
33.
10,000
4.000
Tisa (335)
13. MOL Rt.
ZSÁMBOK
Tapio 18,9 -Zagyva 30,5 Tisa
Fuel transported by pipeline crossing watercourses
62.
10,000
4.000
335,5
15.
Miskolc municipal waste water treatment plant
Miskolc
Sajó 49,1 Tisa 491,9
treatment of municipal sewage
6,880
3.838
45.
Tiszavíz Vizieromu Kft.
Tiszalök
Tisa (512)
Transformer site
5,300
3.724
14.
Drótárú és Drótkötél Ipari és Keres-kedelmi Rt. Szlovák tul.
Miskolc
Sajó 51 Tisa 491,9
Production of wire and metal rope
4,400
3.643
Summe
537,998,110
8.7
Page 2 of 7
ARS Hungary
A.) Industry - POTENTIAL ACCIDENTAL RISK SPOTS > DANUBE-DRAVA < RIVER SUB-BASIN 2001.
Sum of water risk
Water risk
No
Name and proprietor of the company
Place, settlement
EOV coordinates
Receiving watercources (km)
Activity of the company (type of technology)
class equivalents
index
X
Y
107. MOL RT
Ercsi
635.232 210.251
Duna
Gas and oilindustry, storage activity
72,414,050
7.860
116. MOL RT.Komárom-i Bázistelep
Komárom
581.310 264.810
Duna
Gas and oilindustry, storage activity
43,600,000
7.639
108. Garé vesz.hull. tároló
Garé
585.471 64.981
Hegyadó p.-Dráva
waste processing, storing
16,000,000
7.204
125. MOL RT. Dunai Finomító
Százhalombatta
639.322 219.091
Duna
Gas and oilindustry, storage activity
15,028,120
7.177
73.
MOL RT. bázistelep
Budapest, 21. kerület
651.494 231.184
Duna
Gas and oilindustry, storage activity
2,800,000
6.447
129. 1.MAGYAR OLAJTAROLÓ RT.
Tolna
627.903 121.444
Fényes ér, Duna
Oilstorage, translead
2,500,000
6.398
76.
CSEPELI EROMU Rt.
Budapest, 21. kerület
651.494 231.184
Duna
power supply
1,568,700
6.196
8.
ÉSZAK-PESTI SZENNYVZTISZTITÓ T.
Budapest, 04. kerület
652.907 249.101
Duna
wastewater usage
1,400,000
6.146
117. M.Viscosa RT. Nyergesujfalu.
Nyergesújfalu
612.333 263.543
Duna
Trade
1,103,300
6.043
114. Tarjánpusztai üza.storage
Gyorasszonyfa
556.739 239.334
Duna
Fuel storage
1,000,000
6.000
84.
DÉLPESTI SZENNYVZTISZTITÓ TLP.
Budapest, 23. kerület
657.473 227.612
Duna, Gyáli cs.
wastewater usage
800,060
5.903
13.
TUNGSRAM RT.VTG Fóti u 141
Budapest, 04. kerület
652.907 249.101
Duna
Electricity and gear matter
556,710
5.746
106. DUNASTYR RT
Ercsi
635.232 210.251
Duna
Styrol production
521,400
5.717
124. DUNASTYR Rt.
Százhalombatta
639.322 219.091
Duna
Stirol production
521,400
5.717
93.
AVANTI RT OLAJKIKÖTO ES ÜZA.
Dunaföldvár
636.914 160.836
Duna
Fuel distribution, storage
444,000
5.647
11.
GEL-E TUNGSRAM RT.Váci u 77
Budapest, 04. kerület
652.907 249.101
Duna
Electric equipment production
377,420
5.577
45.
BUDAPESTI EROMU - Angyalfold
Budapest, 13. kerület
651.017 244.553
Duna
power supply
321,280
5.507
120. Sellyei Agrokémia Kft
Sellye
557.602 60.025
Dráva
Fertilizer and Pesticides mufacturing, trade
306,650
5.487
6.
BUDALAKK KFT Dunasor 11
Budapest, 04. kerület
652.907 249.101
Duna
Paint production, storage
302,400
5.481
90.
Richter G.Vegyészeti Rt. Dorog
Dorog
627.293 263.664
Kenyérmezoi p.-Duna
chemical industry, distribution
214,920
5.332
55.
Ferihegyi Repülotér
Budapest, 18. kerület
657.166 233.529
Duna
Aerial transport
185,000
5.267
118. Paksi Atomeromu Rt.
Paks
631.612 141.796
Duna
Energy production
149,030
5.173
7.
EISELE.HUNGÁRIA Kft. Váci u 117
Budapest, 04. kerület
652.907 249.101
Duna
Machine-tool production
140,550
5.148
52.
EVM.RT,
Budapest, 17. kerület
661.717 231.657
Duna
chemical industry, distribution
137,930
5.140
37.
RICHTER Rt.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Pharmaceutical manufakturing, trade
132,000
5.121
15.
CHINOIN RT.
Budapest, 04. kerület Tó u. 1-5.
652.907 249.101
Duna
Pharmaceutical manufakturing
107,504
5.031
27.
POLISTORE storageozási KFT.
Budapest, 09. kerület
653.043 235.768
Duna
Storage
105,194
5.022
4.
GANZ ANSALDO VILL RT
Budapest, 02. kerület
644.846 245.182
Duna
Electric equipment production
80,150
4.904
54.
TENZOR Kft.
Budapest, 17. kerület
661.717 231.657
Duna
Fémtömegcikk gyártás
80,000
4.903
36.
MUGYANTA Kft.. Ujhegyi u.3.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
chemical industry, distribution
78,000
4.892
23.
Budapesti Vegyimuvek
Budapest, 09. kerület
653.043 235.768
Duna
chemical industry
75,900
4.880
79.
CHINOIN Rt. Nagytétényi Telepe
Budapest, 22. kerület
646.315 230.628
Duna
Pharmaceutical manufakturing, trade
70,040
4.845
32.
ERECO Rt.PAPIRÜZEM MAGLÓDI 18.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Paper production
50,000
4.699
88.
MATERIAL Vegyipari Sz.
Budapest, 23. kerület
657.473 227.612
Duna, Gyáli cs.
chemical industry
50,000
4.699
89.
P+M POLIMER KÉMIA KFT.
Budapest, 23. kerület
657.473 227.612
Duna, Gyáli cs.
Plastics, stock production
50,000
4.699
31.
EGIS Rt
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
46,410
4.667
2.
MATERIAL Vegyipari Sz.
Alsónémedi
659.656 218.639
Duna
chemical industry
25,000
4.398
110. Budapesti Vegyimuvek
Gyál
662.942 225.444
Gyáli csatorna
chemical industry
22,500
4.352
123. Dunamenti Eromu RT
Százhalombatta
639.322 219.091
Duna
Energy production
20,000
4.301
74.
SYNTAN Vegyianyaggyártó Kft.
Budapest, 21. kerület
651.494 231.184
Duna
chemical industry, distribution
18,000
4.255
34.
FMV Finommechanikai Rt.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Prrecisson mechanics
15,000
4.176
97.
ÁFOR üza. kút
Dunakeszi
656.136 255.304
Duna
Fuel distribution, storage
14,400
4.158
102. SCHELL
Dunakeszi
656.136 255.304
Duna
Fuel distribution, storage
13,800
4.140
91.
KEMIKÁL Építoanyagipari Rt.
Drávagárdony
538.334 67.419
Dráva
Building matter industry
13,500
4.130
92.
KEMIKÁL Építoanyagipari Rt.
Drávatamási
535.327 67.942
Dráva
Building matter industry
13,500
4.130
98.
AGIP benzinkut
Dunakeszi
656.136 255.304
Duna
Fuel distribution, storage
13,000
4.114
10.
Fov.Vízmuvek RT.Váci u 121
Budapest, 04. kerület
652.907 249.101
Duna
Treatment of drinking water
12,000
4.079
51.
IV. Váci ut 121. Vízmu
budapest, 15. kerület
661.573 242.125
Szilas p.
Treatment of drinking water
12,000
4.079
Page 3 of 7
ARS Hungary
81.
Magyar általános Gyufaipari KF
Budapest, 22. kerület
646.315 230.628
Duna
Match production
12,000
4.079
39.
TAURIL GUMI.Kft.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Gum, gumproduce, distribution
11,164
4.048
121. SzigetChem Kft
Sellye
557.602 187.131
Drava
Vegetable oil manufacturing
11,100
4.045
3.
AGROKER Bajai Kir.
Baja
644.143 93.603
Duna
Agricultural chemical trade, storage
10,000
4.000
9.
FCSM RT.ép-i telep Tímár u 1
Budapest, 04. kerület
652.907 249.101
Duna
Sewers
10,000
4.000
14.
ÚJP.MOSODA Kft.Attila u 156
Budapest, 04. kerület
652.907 249.101
Duna
Dry cleaning
9,100
3.959
100. JET üzemanyagtölto
Dunakeszi
656.136 255.304
Duna
Fuel distribution
9,000
3.954
104. DUNAMENTI EROMU Rt
Ercsi
635.232 210.251
Duna
power supply
8,000
3.903
112. GRABOPLAST Textil és muborgyár
Gyor
546.195 259.385
Duna
Plastic leather production
8,000
3.903
68.
Csepel Fémmü
Budapest, 21. kerület
651.494 231.184
Duna
Metal tooling
7,800
3.892
78.
BUSZESZ Rt.Bfoki é. Szeszgyár
Budapest, 22. kerület
646.315 230.628
Duna
Spirit product
5,500
3.740
21.
AGA GAZ kft.
Budapest, 09. kerület
653.043 235.768
Duna
Gas storage, distribution
5,450
3.736
22.
Budapest Husnagyker.Vallalat
Budapest, 09. kerület
653.043 235.768
Duna
Cooling system operating
5,100
3.708
94.
DUNAUJVAROSI PAPIRGYAR KFT
Dunaföldvár
636.914 160.836
Duna
Paper production
5,000
3.699
103. FINOMPAPIRGYÁR RT.
Dunaújváros
638.653 178.435
Duna
Paper production
5,000
3.699
115. FINOMPAPIRGYÁR
Kisapostag
639.706 173.601
Duna
Paper production
5,000
3.699
40.
Újhegyi u. 3. Mügyanta kft.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
chemical industry
4,000
3.602
49.
Délker Tranzit Rakt. Kft.
Budapest, 15. kerület
661.573 242.125
Szilas p.
Fodd storage, cooler
4,000
3.602
50.
Harsányi . Délker
Budapest, 15. kerület
661.573 242.125
Szilas p.
Cooling system operating
4,000
3.602
70.
Csepeli Transzform.Gyár Rt.
Budapest, 21. kerület
651.494 231.184
Duna
Electric equipment production
4,000
3.602
77.
Budapesti Vegyimuvek Rt.Nagyt.
Budapest, 22. kerület
646.315 230.628
Duna
chemical industry
4,000
3.602
85.
ELSO VEGYI INDUSTRIA RT. 1.tp.
Budapest, 23. kerület
657.473 227.612
Duna, Gyáli cs.
Chemical industry, production, distribution
4,000
3.602
132. Schöller Budatej Bt.
Törökbálint
639.885 233.994
Duna
Milkindustry activity
4,000
3.602
25.
LINDE Gáz Magyarorszag Rt.
Budapest, 09. kerület
653.043 235.768
Duna
Gasindustry, gas-services
3,420
3.534
24.
HERZ Szalámigyár Rt.
Budapest, 09. kerület
653.043 235.768
Duna
Flesindustry activity, coller
3,000
3.477
30.
ATHENAEUM NYOMDA Rt.KOZMA U.2.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Printing activity
3,000
3.477
56.
IX. Herz RT.
Budapest, 18. kerület
657.166 233.529
Duna
Flesindustry activity, coller
3,000
3.477
57.
IX. Landhof kft.
Budapest, 18. kerület
657.166 233.529
Duna
coolerindustry activity
3,000
3.477
61.
IX. Herz RT.
Budapest, 19. kerület
656.912 247.639
Duna
Flesindustry activity, coller
3,000
3.477
62.
IX. Landhof kft.
Budapest, 19. kerület
656.912 247.639
Duna
coolerindustry activity
3,000
3.477
65.
IX. Herz RT.
Budapest, 20. kerület
655.724 231.995
Duna
Flesindustry activity, coller
3,000
3.477
66.
IX. Landhof kft.
Budapest, 20. kerület
655.724 231.995
Duna
coolerindustry activity
3,000
3.477
86.
IX Herz RT.
Budapest, 23. kerület
657.473 227.612
Duna, Gyáli cs.
Flesindustry activity, coller
3,000
3.477
87.
IX. Landhof kft.
Budapest, 23. kerület
657.473 227.612
Duna, Gyáli cs.
coolerindustry activity
3,000
3.477
75.
UNIVERTRANS Kft.
Budapest, 21. kerület
651.494 231.184
Duna
Fuel storage
2,600
3.415
113. RABA MVG Rt.
Gyor
546.195 259.385
Duna
Machine industry, production
2,600
3.415
26.
MIRELITE Budapest Rt.
Budapest, 09. kerület
653.043 235.768
Duna
coolerindustry activity
2,500
3.398
58.
IX. Mirelite
Budapest, 18. kerület
657.166 233.529
Duna
coolerindustry activity
2,500
3.398
63.
IX. Mirelite
Budapest, 19. kerület
656.912 247.639
Duna
coolerindustry activity
2,500
3.398
67.
IX. Mirelite
Budapest, 20. kerület
655.724 231.995
Duna
coolerindustry activity
2,500
3.398
42.
Caola 1. gyártelep
Budapest, 11. kerület
647.507 235.014
Duna
Cosmetica and Domestic chemicalindustry product
2,430
3.386
29.
ATHENAEUM NY.Rt.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Printing activity
2,400
3.380
60.
IX. Bp. Husnagyker
Budapest, 19. kerület
656.912 247.639
Duna
Flesindustry activity, coller
2,100
3.322
64.
IX. Bp. Husnagyker.
Budapest, 20. kerület
655.724 231.995
Duna
Flesindustry activity, coller
2,100
3.322
18.
ELSO VEGYI INDUSTRIA RT. 1.tp.
Budapest, 07. kerület
651.526 240.664
Duna
chemical industry
2,000
3.301
33.
FEFE INVEST Kft.JASZBER.U.18.-
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Battery
2,000
3.301
44.
Kender-Juta Politextil Rt.
Budapest, 13. kerület
651.017 244.553
Duna
Hemp processing
2,000
3.301
53.
Kobányai Sörgyár
Budapest, 17. kerület
661.717 231.657
Duna
Beer production
2,000
3.301
59.
Kobányai Sörgyár
Budapest, 18. kerület
657.166 233.529
Duna
Beer production
2,000
3.301
96.
Budapesti Vegyimuvek
Dunaharaszti
654.481 223.115
Duna
chemical industry
2,000
3.301
99.
Hütoipari Vállalat
Dunakeszi
656.136 255.304
Duna
coolerindustry activity
2,000
3.301
105. Dunamenti Eromu RT
Ercsi
635.232 210.251
Duna
Energy production
2,000
3.301
17.
Városligeti Müjégpálya
Budapest, 06. kerület
650.795 241.136
Duna
Ice production
1,800
3.255
19.
Városligeti Müjégpálya
Budapest, 07. kerület
651.526 240.664
Duna
Ice production
1,800
3.255
20.
Városligeti Müjégpálya
Budapest, 08. kerület
652.568 238.849
Duna
Cooling system operating
1,800
3.255
Page 4 of 7
ARS Hungary
41.
KOBANYAI EROMU
Budapest, 10. kerület, Bihari u. 10/a
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
power supply
1,800
3.255
46.
Népstadion és Int. Vár.Müjégp.
Budapest, 14. kerület
654.776 243.191
Duna, Rákos
Icesport
1,800
3.255
48.
Városligeti Müjégpálya
Budapest, 14. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Ice production
1,800
3.255
128. Polarkerm Tata
Tata
594.133 254.124
Fényes ér, Duna
chemical industry, distribution
1,560
3.193
80.
HUNGAVIS Budafoki KFT
Budapest, 22. kerület
646.315 230.628
Duna
Wine, champagne distribution
1,440
3.158
82.
Nagytétényi ut Hungavis
Budapest, 22. kerület
646.315 230.628
Duna
Fodd storage, huto
1,440
3.158
130. MOL RT UZA. BAZIS TOLNA
Tolna
627.903 121.444
Fényes ér, Duna
Gas and oilindustry activity
1,400
3.146
16.
Mirelite
Budapest, 05. kerület
649.560 240.012
Duna
Cooling system operating
1,000
3.000
71.
Fovárosi Vízmuvek
Budapest, 21. kerület
651.494 231.184
Duna
Treatment of drinking water
1,000
3.000
72.
MIRELIT Bp. Hótôipari Rt.
Budapest, 21. kerület
651.494 231.184
Duna
coolerindustry activity
1,000
3.000
122. Dunai FinomItó
Százhalombatta
639.322 219.091
Duna
Petroleum refinement
950
2.978
95.
Messer Hungarogáz KFT
Dunaföldvár
636.914 160.836
Duna
Gasindustry, gas-services
940
2.973
83.
POLISTORE storageozási KFT.
Budapest, 22. kerület
646.315 230.628
Duna
Storage
650
2.813
12.
MESSER GRIESHEIM H. Kft.
Budapest, 04. kerület
652.907 249.101
Duna
Gasindustry, gas-services
550
2.740
5.
MAGYAR FILMINTEZET
Budapest, 02. kerület
644.846 245.182
Duna
Filmproduction
500
2.699
101. MÁV Vagongyártó és Jav. Kft.
Dunakeszi
656.136 255.304
Duna
Wagon production, repair
500
2.699
119. SZÁZHALOMBATTA MOL RT
Ráckeresztúr
632.514 216.200
Duna
Petroleum refinement
450
2.653
126. MOL RT. Dunai Finomító
Szigetcsép
642.717 214.295
Duna
Gas and oilindustry, storage activity
450
2.653
127. MOL RT. Dunai Finomító
Szigethalom
647.006 220.888
Duna
Gas and oilindustry, storage activity
450
2.653
131. MOL Rt. Dunai Finomító
Tököl
643.747 220.579
Duna
Gas and oilindustry, storage activity
450
2.653
35.
KÖBAL Kft.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Metal tooling, cutting
320
2.505
111. CEREOL Növényolajipari Rt
Gyor
546.195 259.385
Duna
Vegetable oil manufacturing
300
2.477
43.
Ferrokemia Szovetkezet
Budapest, 13. kerület
651.017 244.553
Duna
Metal tooling, surface treatment
220
2.342
38.
SKW BIOTECH.Rt.SZÁLLÁS U.3.
Budapest, 10. kerület
658.487 238.291
Duna, Rákos
Biotechnology
200
2.301
109. AGROPLAST Gy. Körösi ét
Gyál
662.942 225.444
Gyáli csatorna
Agrarian packermatter production
200
2.301
69.
Csepeli Munkás ÁFÉSZ
Budapest, 21. kerület
651.494 231.184
Duna
Gas storage
170
2.230
28.
ZWACK Ker.BULIV termelo Kft
Budapest, 09. kerület
653.043 235.768
Duna
Drink production
160
2.204
47.
SANOSIL Hungária Kft
Budapest, 14. kerület
654.776 243.191
Duna, Rákos
chemical industry, distribution
110
2.041
Summe
163,766,892
8.214226108
Page 5 of 7
ARS Hungary
B.) Agriculture - POTENTIAL ACCIDENTAL RISK SPOTS > TISA < RIVER SUB-BASIN 2001.
EOV coordinates
Sum of water risk
Water risk
No
Name and proprietor of the company
Place, settlement
Receiving watercources (km)
Activity of the company (type of technology)
X
Y
class equivalents
index
3.
Agricultural Co-operative
Egyek
Tisafüredi main canal (19)
Agricultural storage
601,000
5.779
VIII/2. tributary (3), VIII. main river
426,000
5.629
14.
AGROKER RT.
Nyíregyháza, Kinizsi u. 2.
850.813
296.037 (11), Lónyay c (22), Tisa (559)
Storing and selling pesticides
20.
AGROCHIM-TRANSPACK
Tuzsér outskirts
880.784
337.448 Belfo canal (50), Tisa (569)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
92,000
4.964
Vármegyei canal (7) Túr- canal
60,000
4.778
4.
AGROKER RT.
Fehérgyarmati Kirendeltség
910.093
301.274 (18) Tisa river (692)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
60,000
4.778
5.
AGROKER RT.
Kisvárdai Kirendeltség
876.145
326.445 Belfo canal (35), Tisa river (569)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
Kraszna river (20)
60,000
4.778
7.
BIOGARTEN Bt.
Mátészalka, Munkácsi M. út 16.
895.501
296.69 Tisa river (682)
storage of pesticides
Kraszna river (20)
60,000
4.778
8.
AGROKER RT.
Mátészalkai Kirendeltség
895.501
296.69 Tisa river (682)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
VII. sz. main river (25), Lónyay
60,000
4.778
9.
BIGE-HOLDING Kft.
Nagykálló
860.462
286.476 canal (30), Tisa (559)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
Nyírbátor-Vasvári canal (16),
Kraszna river (34), Tisa river
60,000
4.778
12.
NAVAKER Kft.
Nyírbátor
882.459
283.179 (682)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
Nyírbátor-Vasvári canal (16),
Kraszna river (34), Tisa river
60,000
4.778
13.
AGROKER RT.
Nyírbátori Kirendeltség
882.459
283.179 (682)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
VIII/2.sz. tributary (1), VIII. sz.
main river (12), Lónyay canal (22),
60,000
4.778
15.
UNK Kft.
Nyíregyháza, Simonyi út
850.813
296.037 Tisa (559)
storage of pesticides
VIII. main canal (11) Lónyay canal
60,000
4.778
16.
KEMOKER Kft.
Nyíregyháza, Westsik V. u.
850.813
296.037 (22) Tisa river (559)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
VIII/1.sz. tributary (7), VIII. sz.
main river (4), Lónyay canal (22),
60,000
4.778
17.
AGROFOCUS '97 Kft.
Nyíregyháza-Kolapos
850.813
296.037 Tisa (559)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
Nord+F65 main canal (5),
60,000
4.778
19.
FARMIX Kft.
Szamosszeg (raktár)
898.742
306.923 Kraszna (5), Tisa (682)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
VII. sz. main river (25), Lónyay
40,000
4.602
10.
KITE Rt.
Nagykálló
860.462
286.476 canal (30), Tisa (559)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
Nagyhalász-Pátrohai canal (15),
36,000
4.556
2.
IKR Rt.
Demecser
865.332
313.993 Belfo canal (9), Tisa (569)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
Pesticides and fertilisers, trade of spare parts for
34,000
4.531
6.
Agroker Rt.
Mályi
Hejo-brook 11,3 Szarda canal
agriculture
VII/2. tributary (10), VII. main river
(10), Lónyay canal (30), Tisa
24,000
4.380
11.
GITR
862.011
293.772 (559)
storage of pesticides and fertilizers
18.
JNK Gabona Kft
Rákóczifalva
741.304
193.781 Tisa
Fertilizer storage, allocation
10,000
4.000
Mirhó-Gyócsi canal. 8,51 km Tisa
1.
META Kft.
Abádszalók
233.000
767.000 402 fkm
Liquid manure from pig-farm
5,000
3.699
Summe
1,928,000
6.285
Page 6 of 7
ARS Hungary
B.) Agriculture - POTENTIAL ACCIDENTAL RISK SPOTS > DANUBE-DRAVA < RIVER SUB-BASIN 2001.
EOV coordinates
Activity of the company (type of
Sum of water risk
Water risk
No
Name and proprietor of the company
Place, settlement
Receiving watercources (km)
X
Y
technology)
class equivalents
index
22.
Bólyi Agrokémia
Mohács
622.477
74.446
Danube
Fertilizer storage, trade
1,000,000
6.0
21.
Termelo Solg. ÉrtSzövetkezet
Mezofalva
628.076
93.603
Danube
Agricultural chemical trade, storage
500,000
5.7
26.
Sellyei Agrokémia Kft
Sellye
557.602
274.186
Drava
Agricultural storage
450,000
5.7
18.
Martoseed Rt
Martonvásár
630.025
259.385
Danube
Agricultural chemical trade, storage
234,000
5.4
15.
Agricultural Szövetkezet
Kalocsa
646.666
206.024
Danube
Pesticides storage, allocation
120,000
5.1
17.
Petofi Mg.Szöv.
Kalocsa
646.666
219.891
Danube
Pesticides storage, allocation
100,000
5.0
23.
Agro Centrál Bt
Sellye
557.602
237.747
Drava
Agricultural chemical trade, storage
70,000
4.8
4.
Hajnal Földbérlo Szolg.Szöv.
Besnyo
628.494
280.801
Danube
Pesticides storage, allocation
50,000
4.7
12.
Sallai Szövetkezet
Drávaszerdahely
581.579
280.801
Drava
Pesticides storage, allocation
50,000
4.7
16.
Aranykalász Agrárszöv.
Kalocsa
646.666
252.814
Danube
Agricultural chemical trade, storage
40,000
4.6
13.
Péti Nitrogénmuvek RT
Ercsi
635.232
236.446
Danube
Pesticides storage, allocation
30,000
4.5
25.
Petofi Mg.Szöv.
Sellye
557.602
206.03
Drava
Pesticides storage, allocation
30,000
4.5
30.
AGROKEMIA TOLNA
Tolna
627.903
121.444
Danube
Fertilizer storage, allocation
22,000
4.3
9.
Új Élet Mg.Szöv.
Drávafok
549.838
104.414
Drava
Pesticides storage, allocation
20,000
4.3
14.
Mezogazd.Szövetkezet
Felsoszentmárton
545.966
206.024
Drava
Pesticides storage, allocation
20,000
4.3
24.
Agroker Kft
Sellye
557.602
209.374
Drava
Pesticides storage, allocation
20,000
4.3
28.
Agroker Kft
Tata
594.133
237.747
Fényes ér, Danube
Pesticides storage, allocation
20,000
4.3
8.
Mezogazdasági Rt.
Drávafok
549.838
61.626
Drava
Agricultural storage
18,000
4.3
7.
Északmagyarországi Vegyimuvek Rt
Drávafok
549.838
170.392
Drava
Pesticides storage, allocation
15,000
4.2
29.
Intercooperation Rt
Tata
594.133
254.124
Fényes ér, Danube
Fertilizer storage, trade
15,000
4.2
20.
Béke Mg.Szöv.
Mezofalva
628.076
170.29
Danube
Pesticides storage, allocation
12,000
4.1
2.
Mezogazd.Szövetkezet
Baja
644.143
173.768
Danube
Pesticides storage, allocation
10,000
4.0
3.
Agro-Berek
Beremend
602.939
224.997
Drava
Pesticides storage, allocation
10,000
4.0
5.
AGROKER
Budapest, 15. kerület
661.573
357.277
Danube
Pesticides storage, allocation
10,000
4.0
19.
Új élet Mg.Szövetkezet
Martonvásár
630.025
91.745
Danube
Pesticides storage, allocation
10,000
4.0
27.
SzigetChem Kft
Sellye
557.602
60.025
Drava
Fertilizer storage, trade
10,000
4.0
11.
Hunyadi Mg.Szöv.
Drávaszerdahely
581.579
197.378
Drava
Fertilizer., Pesticides manufacturing
7,000
3.8
1.
AGROKER Bajai Kir.
Baja
644.143
60.025
Danube
Fertilizer. Pesticides manufacturing, trade
6,000
3.8
10.
Agro Centrál Bt
Drávaszerdahely
581.579
56.285
Drava
Fertilizer storage, allocation
6,000
3.8
6.
Intercooperation Rt.
Budapest, 15. kerület
661.573
242.125
Szilas brook, Danube
Fertilizer storage, trade
5,000
3.7
Page 7 of 7
ARS Slovenia
ARS Slovenia
SLOVENIA - Inventory of potential pollution sources in the Danube Basin
Place, settlement
Recipient river
Company activities Dangerous
Toxic
Total amount Storage
Free
No
Nameand proprietor of
Remarks
Total quantity in kg/l Water risk class Sum of
Water
the companyof the
(length of stream / type of
substances
properties handled/
facilities
operational
equivalent
water risk
Company
in km)
production
stored (metric)
volume
class
risk
process,
equivalents
index
technology used
WGK
(%)
1.
Rudnik Mezica
Crna na Koroskem Meza (21.7 )
Metallurgy
Slag from metallurgy
1
83.000 m3
Land-fill site
0% Closure of the
83,000,000
830000
5.9
MPI,d.o.o.
Northern region of
process
for industrial
site-operation in
Slovenia (Koroska Drava
Artificial Substances-
deposited
solid wastes
1999.
region)
plastics
Sava
Rubber
Brick
Waste furnace pads
2.
Petrol d.d.
Pesnica,
Gacniski potok
Land-fill site
Acid tar
1
15.000 m3
Deposited in the
0%
15,000,000
150000
5.2
(0.8)
deposited
water
Ljubljana
Maribor Nort_east-
Pesnica (48.6)
ern region of
Slovenia
(Stajerska region)
Drava
Sava
Remark: data in the column 5 (dangerous substances) are indicated in accordance with the inventory of the land-fill sites in Slovenia.
Summe
980000
6.0
Page 1 of 1
ARS Croatia
ARS Croatia
INVENTORY OF POTENTIAL ACCIDENTAL RISK SPOTS IN DANUBE BASIN - CROATIA
NAME OF THE LOCATION/
COMPANY ACTIVITIES/ DANGEROUS
TOXIC
TOTAL AMOUNT
STORAGE
FREE
No
RECIPIENT
REMARKS
Total quantity in kg/l
Water risk class
Sum of water risk
Water risk
COMPANY,
RIVER (length of
SUBSTANCES
PROPERTIES DANGEROUS
FACILITIES
OPERATI
equivalents
class equivalents
stream in km)
SUBSTANCES HANDLED
ONAL
index
/ STORED (tons/year)
VOLUME
OWNER
DISTRICT
type of production
(WGK values)
(%)
processes
PETROKEMIJA
TOWN
KUTINICA (3 )
fertilizers, soot and
waste fluorine
1
lagoons inside a
In case of
D.D.
bentonite clay production
6 m hig3h
accident ,waste
1. JOINT STOCK
KUTINA
ILOVA (10 )
water
46
earthen dike
fluorine water
COMPANY
could be spread
SAVA (567)
(pH 2,1)
5,242 000 m3
over off stream 5,242,000,000
52420000
52420000
7.7
DUNAV (1170)
detention
2. PETROKEMIJA TOWN
KUTINICA (6)
Amonia
2
8000
metal tank in
The content of 5
storage
8,000,000
2,207,500
6.3
D.D.
concrete safety
tanks of
pool
phosphatic and
800000
JOINT STOCK KUTINA
ILOVA (10)
metal tanks
1 tank of fluorine
COMPANY
silicic acid could
SAVA (567)
phosphatic acid
2875
metal tank
(*)
be held in
2,875,000
287500
DUNAV (1170)
fluorine silicic
200
metal tanks in
detention
200,000
acid
concrete safety
storage D-1
pool
20000
weak phosphatic
1500
earthen pool
1,500,000
acid
storage
150000
metal tank in
concrete safety
pool
sulphuric acid
5000
metal tank in
5,000,000
concrete safety
pool
500000
nitric acid
metal tanks in
concrete safety
pool
2000
2,000,000
200000
heavy fuel oil
2500
2,500,000
250000
oils
4000
4,000,000
400000
Page 1 of 8
ARS Croatia
3. HEP D.D.
TOWN
SAVA (603)
production of electric
stoking oil
2
64000
metal tanks in
64,000,000
6,443,600
6.8
POGON
energy
concrete safety
TERMOELEKTR
pool
ANA SISAK
6400000
CROATION
SISAK
DUNAV (1170)
tin barrels
ELECTRIC
MANAGEMENT
COMPANY,
THERMAL
POWER PLANT
SISAK
JOINT-STOCK
oil for turbines
99
transformator
(*)
99,000
COMPANY
and metal tanks
9900
transformator oil
225
rubber-coated
225,000
tanks
22500
rubber-coated
tanks
natrium hidroxide
60
60,000
6000
chloric acid
52
52,000
5200
4.
INA D.D.
TOWN
SAVA (603)
oil processing
oil
1
220000
metal tanks in
220,000,000
7,049,250
6.8
RAFINERIJA
concrete safety
NAFTE SISAK
pools
2200000
INA OIL
SISAK
DUNAV (1170)
metal tanks in
RAFINERY
concrete safety
pools
JOINT-STOCK
oil products
480000
metal tanks in (*)
480,000,000
COMPANY
concrete safety
pools
4800000
metal tanks in
concrete safety
pools
MTBE
3700
metal tanks in
3,700,000
concrete safety
pools
37000
metal tanks in
concrete safety
pools
NaOH
580
580,000
5800
HCl
435
435,000
4350
TEO I TMO
210
210,000
2100
Page 2 of 8
ARS Croatia
5. JANAF D.D.
TOWN
SAVA (603)
oil storage
oil
2
85000
metal tanks in 25-30
85,000,000
8,500,000
6.9
ADRIATIC OIL SISAK
DUNAV (1170)
concrete safety
PIPELINE
pools
TERMINAL
SISAK JOINT-
STOCK
COMPANY
6. SKLADISTE
TOWN
KRAPINA ( 25) oil products storage
diesel
2
20000
metal tanks
20,000,000
3,000,000
6.5
ZABOK
OWNER:
ZABOK
SAVA (741)
petrol
10000
10,000,000
REPUBLIC OF
CROATIA
DUNAV (1170)
7. INA
TOWN
SAVA (686)
oil products storage
oil products
2
75000
8 metal tanks in
75,000,000
7,500,000
6.9
INDUSTRIJA
concrete safety
NAFTE D.D.
pool
ZAGREB III
ZAGREB
DUNAV (1170)
11 double-
STRUGE BB,
plated metal
JOINT-STOCK
tanks placed
COMPANY
under ground
8. HEP D.D.
TOWN
SAVA (686)
production of electric
heavy stoking oil
2
18500
steel anks in
18,500,000
1,850,000
6.3
POGON TE-TO,
energy
clay pool
KUSEVACKA
BB, ZITNJAK
THERMAL
ZAGREB
DUNAV (1170)
POWER PLANT
JOINT-STOCK
COMPANY
9. INA
TOWN
SAVA (686)
production of oil products oils
2
6370
6,370,000
1,882,500
6.3
INDUSTRIJA
(lubricants)
NAFTE D.D.
ZAGREB
MAZIVA,
RADNICKA
CESTA 175
JOINT-STOCK ZAGREB
DUNAV (1170)
stoking oil
11280
metal tanks in
11,280,000
COMPANY
heavy fuel oil
200
concrete safety
200,000
pool
oil based
975
975,000
additives
Page 3 of 8
ARS Croatia
10 DIOKI D.D.
TOWN
SAVA (686)
production of plastics
31% chloric acid
1
90
special steel
90,000
19,050
4.3
metal tanks in
LOKACIJA OKI, ZAGREB
DUNAV (1170)
40% natrium
95
concrete safety
95,000
ZITNJAK BB
pools
JOINT-STOCK
hydroxide
1720
1,720,000
COMPANY
phenyl-ethylene
11. INA
VILLAGE
CANAL "LONJA - crude oil exploitation and crude oil
2
metal tanks
I
n case of
INDUSTRIJA
STRUG" (94)
transport
(2*5000m3) in
accident, crude
NAFTE D.D.
concrete safety
oil could be
ZAGREB
pool
spread over off
OIL INDUSTRY ZUTICA
SAVA (560)
stream
detention
JOINT-STOCK
DUNAV (1170)
storage
COMPANY
"Lonjsko polje"
12. INA
VILLAGE
CANAL "LONJA - crude oil exploitation and crude oil
2
metal tanks
In case of
INDUSTRIJA
STRUG" (78)
transport
(4*5000m3) in
accident, crude
NAFTE D.D.
concrete safety
oil could be
ZAGREB
pool
spread over off
OIL INDUSTRY STRUZEC
SAVA ( 469)
stream
detention
JOINT-STOCK
DUNAV (1170)
storage
COMPANY
"Lonjsko polje"
13. INA
VILLAGE
CANAL "LONJA- crude oil exploitation and crude oil
2
metal tanks
In case of
INDUSTRIJA
STRUG" (33)
transport
(2*5000m3) in
accident, crude
NAFTE D.D.
concrete safety
oil could be
ZAGREB
pool
spread over off
OIL INDUSTRY LIPOVLJANI SAVA ( 469)
stream
detention
JOINT-STOCK
DUNAV (1170)
storage "Mokro
COMPANY
polje"
14. INA
VILLAGE
BOSUT (65)
crude oil exploitation and crude oil
2
metal tanks
INDUSTRIJA
transport
(2*5000m3) in
NAFTE D.D.
concrete safety
ZAGREB
pool
OIL INDUSTRY ÐELETOVCI SAVA (317)
JOINT-STOCK
DUNAV (1170)
COMPANY
15. LOLA RIBAR
TOWN
MREZNICA (3 ) textile industry
heavy fuel oil
2
200
metal tank in
200,000
20,000
4.3
D.D.
concrete safety
JOINT STOCK KARLOVAC Korana (6)
pool
COMPANY
KUPA (136)
SAVA (603)
DUNAV (1170)
Page 4 of 8
ARS Croatia
16. J.P. TOPLANA TOWN
KUPA (136)
heat energy production heavy fuel oil
2
950
metal tank in
950,000
95,000
5.0
PUBLIC
KARLOVAC SAVA (603)
concrete safety
ENTERPRISE
pool
DUNAV (1170)
17. HERBOS D.D. TOWN
SAVA (603)
production of pesticides cianuril chloride
1
50
plastic
50,000
2,700
3.4
SISAK
containers
JOINT STOCK SISAK
DUNAV (1170)
natrium
140
metal tank in
10
140,000
COMPANY
hydroxide
concrete safety
pool
metal tank in
concrete safety
pool
isopropilamine
20
metal tank in
10
20,000
concrete safety
pool
metal tanks
monoethilamine
20
10
20,000
atrazine
40
40,000
18. ZELJEZARA
TOWN
SAVA (603)
production of steel an
chloric acid
1
30
rubber-coated 50
30,000
1,300
3.1
SISAK D.D.
steel products
steel metal
IRON
SISAK
DUNAV (1170)
natrium
30
tanks in
50
30,000
FOUNDARY
hydroxide
concrete safety
JOINT-STOCK
sulphuric acid
70
pools
50
70,000
COMPANY
19. METEOR D.D. TOWN
JOSAVA (26)
chemical industry
chloric acid
1
20
metal tank in
20,000
400
2.6
CHEMICAL
concrete safety
INDUSTRY
pool
JOINT-STOCK ÐAKOVO
BIÐ (11)
metal tank in
COMPANY
concrete safety
pool
BOSUT (118)
natrium
20
20,000
hypoklorite
SAVA (317)
DUNAV (1170)
20. PLIVA D.D.
TOWN
SAVA (686)
pharmaceutical and
98% sulphuric
1
182
metal tanks in
182,000
7,830
3.9
chemical industry
acid
concrete safety
PRILAZ
ZAGREB
DUNAV (1170)
chloric acid
182
pools
182,000
BARUNA
FILIPOVICA
JOINT-STOCK
natrium
154
154,000
COMPANY
hydroxide
ammonium
94
94,000
hydroxide
chlorine sulfonic
171
171,000
acid
Page 5 of 8
ARS Croatia
21. PLIVA D.D.
ZAGREBAC. SAVA (716)
pharmaceutical and food Methanol
1
160
metal tanks in
160,000
15,920
4.2
ZUPANIJA
industry
concrete safety
pools
SAVSKI MAROF (ZAGREB
DUNAV (1170)
acetic acid
104
104,000
COUNTY)
JOINT-STOCK
ethanol
206
206,000
COMPANY
acetone
122
122,000
heavy fuel oil
1000
1,000,000
22. PLIVA D.D.
ZAGREBAC. SAVA (686)
pharmaceutical industry heavy fuel oil
2
250
metal tank in
250,000
25,000
4.4
ZUPANIJA
concrete safety
pool
HRVATSKI
(ZAGREB
DUNAV (1170)
LESKOVAC
COUNTY)
JOINT-STOCK
C.
23. BELISCE D.D.
TOWN
DRAVA (54)
production of cellulose, heavy fuel oil
2
10000
metal tank in
No direct risk to 10,000,000
1,065,000
6.0
JOINT-STOCK BELISCE
DANUBE (1383) containers and paper;
chloric acid
350
concrete safety
the river
350,000
COMPANY
destilation of the woods
pool
Danube.
natrium
300
300,000
hydroxide
sulphur
3370
3,370,000
chlorine
10
10,000
colouring matter
25
25,000
24. INA
VILLAGE
PUTNA
crude oil exploitation and crude oil
2
200000
metal tanks
No direct risk to 200,000,000
20,000,000
7.3
INDUSTRIJA
transport
(4*5000m3) in
the river
NAFTE D.D.
concrete safety
Danube.
ZAGREB
pool
OIL INDUSTRY BENICANCI STARA (3)
VUCICA (14)
JOINT-STOCK
VUCICA (33)
COMPANY
DRAVA (29)
DUNAV (1383)
25. TVORNICA
TOWN
DRAVA (12)
production of sugar
waste water from
1
1999000
1,999,000,000
20,040,000
7.3
SECERA
sugar production
OSIJEK D.D.
with organic
nitrogen content
SUGAR
OSIJEK
DANUBE (1383)
heavy fuel oil
FACTORY
OSIJEK
JOINT-STOCK
COMPANY
Page 6 of 8
ARS Croatia
5000
2000 t metal
5,000,000
tank in concrete
safety pool
26. SAPONIA D.D. TOWN
DRAVA (12)
production of detergents, chloric acid
1
100
metal tanks
100,000
36,710
4.6
CHEMICAL,
OSIJEK
DANUBE (1383) and cosmetic products
natrium
786
786,000
FOOD AND
hydroxide
PHARMACEUTI
CAL INDUSTRY
OSIJEK
JOINT-STOCK
tensides
2305
2,305,000
COMPANY
stearic acid
480
480,000
27. HEP D.D. "TE-
TOWN
DRAVA (12)
production of electric
heavy fuel oil
1
5000
metal tanks in
5,000,000
50,000
4.7
TO"
energy and water steam
concrete safety
pool (for heavy
fuel oil)
OSIJEK
OSIJEK
DANUBE (1383)
chloric acid
metal tank (10 t)
in a concrete
safety pool (for
sulphuric acid)
CROATION
natrium
ELECTRIC
hydroxide
MANAGEMENT
COMPANY
THERMAL
POWER PLANT
OSIJEK
JOINT-STOCK
sulphuric acid
COMPANY
28. BOROVO D.D.
TOWN
DANUBE (1333) production of rubber
heavy fuel oil
2
2000 t metal
Destroyed
2,000,000
200,000
5.3
footwear and other
tank in concrete
during the war.
JOINT-STOCK VUKOVAR
rubber products
safety pool
Possible direct
COMPANY
risk to the river
Danube.
29. TVORNICA
TOWN
MANTEC (9)
production of sugar,
waste water from
1
330 000 m3 waste water
earthen pool for
No direct risk to 330,000,000
3,300,000
6.5
SECERA
sugar production
from sugar factory
waste water
the river
VIROVITICA
with organic
Danube.
D.D.
nitrogen content
SUGAR
VIROVITICA ZUPANIJSKI
cleaning industrial waste
FACTORY
KANAL (26)
water and municipal
VIROVITICA
waste water from town
Virovitica on waste water
treatment plant
JOINT-STOCK
DRAVA (125)
COMPANY
Page 7 of 8
ARS Croatia
DANUBE (1383)
30. INA
VILLAGE
KOMARNICA (1) gas exploitation and
sulphids
1
300 m3 metal
No direct risk to 300,000
3,000
3.5
INDUSTRIJA
transport
tank for gas
the river
NAFTE D.D.
Danube.
ZAGREB
OIL INDUSTRY MOLVE
BISTRA (7)
phenols
JOINT-STOCK
DRAVA (203)
mercury
COMPANY
DUNAV (1383)
Summe
135734760
8.1
Note : (* ) - Metal tanks in concrete safety pools.
In accordance with Croatian regulations the volume of concrete safety pools must be the same as the metal tanks.
The Hazards and Risks to the Waters cased by War Damage
It is well known that the hundreds of industrials installations have been destroyed during the past war in Croatia. In many cases destruction might cause the long term consequences to the soil and water environment. Those cases, such as the spillage of Polychlorinated biphenyls from destroyed electric transformers, are of great concern and should be the subject of appropriate investigation. They are not a subject of this inventory.
Page 8 of 8
ARS Bulgaria
ARS Bulgaria
Inventory of Potential Accidental Risk Spots
Bulgaria High risk spots in the Danube River Basin
No
Object /
Location / district
Receiver watercourse Company's object / Dangerous
Toxic
Total quantity
Storage facilities:
Free
com- WGK
Total
Water Sum of WRI
/length (km)
type of technology
substances properties handled/stored
operating ments
quantity
risk
water
used /type of
(tones;tones per
volume
in kg/l
class
risk
production
day)
(%)
equivale
class
nt
equivale
nts
Owner/ User
Tailing
deposits/Ponds
(total volume in m3 )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1.
Liquid fuel storage
Northeast to the town of Danube river (km793)
Loading / unloading
Petroleum
2
Tanks - 400 m3
30%
400000
40000
4.6
facilities in the duty-free Vidin, on the right bank
station
products
(4 x50 m3 and 2x100
area of Vidin/ Emelda
of the Danube river,
m3)
Textile Sanay Ltd. Vidin Vidin region
2.
Petrol storage facilities,
Danube river (788)
Liquid fuel storage
Petroleum
2
Total capacity 6 727 m3
30%
633900
5.8
terminal for petrol and
facilities, terminal and
products
reservoirs/ Ecopetroleum-
station
(2 x2000 m3;
400000
Ltd.-Sofia / Vidin region
1 x1000 m3;
100000
1 700 m3;
70000
1 451 m3;
45100
3 100 m3;
10000
4 50 m3;
5000
2 38 m3)
3800
3.
G.Boukovetz/Chiprovetz T. Chiprovtzy, Montana Chiprovska Ogosta river Flotation procedure
Suspended
1
Total capacity
Tailing pond
There is
76000000
7.9
Tailing pond -
region
(124), tributary of
solids; Fe, Mn,
a project
Chiprovtzy
Danube river;
As, Pb
for
Near the Ogosta dam
2,8 .106 m3
Total capacity-
conserv
V=550.106m3
7,6.106m3
ation
4.
Chimco AD ;
T. Vratza, Vratza region Dabnika river (km 10 ), Production of ammonia, 142 l/s waste
2
and re-
5.3
tributary of Ogosta river carbamide, carbon
water with
(km 54), tributary of
disulphide, ammonium
high nitrogen
Danube river (km 690)
disulphide, ammonium
content (as
water, liquid ? ?
-
-
2, Ar,
NO3 ; NO2 ;
gases, liquid gases, , heat NH + )
and electricity energy
4
production;
57%-IBI TRANS OF
ICI technology of gas
NEW YORK;
production;
25%-private;
14%-state;
3%- private restituted
(restored);
1%- others
ammonia
2
300 t
2 spherical tanks with
75%
200000
total capacity 2000 m3
(1200t)
Page 1 of 10
ARS Bulgaria
5.
Elisejna EAD; state
Elisejna; Vratza region
Iskar river (km128),
Copper production
25,5 l/s waste
1
4.4
owned Tailing pond
tributary of Danube river
water with
(km 643)
high content
of:
nitrogen (as
NO -
2 ),
?? ,COD,
conductivity,
soluble
substances,
solid
substances,
SO4 ions,
heavy metals,
As
Calcium
14-15 000 t/year
Tailing pond
Almost
There is
25000
sulphite
Total capacity 250 m3
exhausted
a project
6.
Metizy AD;
T. Roman,
Iskar river (km 84),
Steel production
Slag %:
sulphate slag
1
10 t / 2000 .
Tailing pond
30% for a
4.3
20000
Slag dam
Vratza region
tributary of Danube river
F2O3-58,8
(14 m3/2000 .)
(km 643)
CaO-13,2
A2O3 3,5
SO3-7,8
SiO2-1,5
7.
Kremikovtzi -industrial Near the south hillside of Lesnovska river (12),
Ores mining and
2.6E+08
8.4
site
Stara Planina mountain, tributary of Iskar river
processing ;
about 13 ?m from Sofia (185), tributary of
steel and several
Danube river (km 643)
nonferrous products
7.1
Kremikovtzi mine
-"-
-"-
Ores mining and
-Explosive
1
Storage 480 m2
processing
materials- area
36.103 m2
-Explosive
1
Storage 96 m2
-ammonium
1
Storage 120 m2
nitrate
7.2
Coke chemical plant
-"-
-"-
Coke production; coke
-pits for coal-
2
5 pits - 58 000 m3
50 000 m3
5000000
chemical products
tar chemical
content:
Water-3-6%;
phenols-1-
1,5%; ? - 6-
10%;
naphthalene: 8-
12%; antracen
4-6% and
other polycicle
hydrocarbons
Pits for acid
2
40 000 m3
20 000 m3
2000000
tar: Chemical
content of acid
tar: water
20%; coal-tar
substances80
%
Page 2 of 10
ARS Bulgaria
Naphthalene
6%; ? 2SO4
2%;
ammonium
sulphate 10%
and polycicle
hydrocarbons;
chemical
content: coal-
tar 15%; water
5%; coal and
coke particles
80%, S-1%;
ash 3%
7.2.1
Primary chemical
-"-
-"-
-crude coal
2 25 m3/d
Reservoirs:
processing plant
benzene
1 x 50 m3;
5000
8 x 100 m3;
80000
4 x 200 m3;
80000
-H2SO4
1 30 t/d
3 x 100 m3;
3000
2 x 15 m3;
300
-NaOH
1 1 t/d
1 x 15 m3;
150
1 x 50 m3;
500
-ethanol amine
1 0,5 t/d
1 x 50 m3;
500
-lubricants
1 8 t/d
1 x 50 m3;
500
1 x 100 m3
1000
-carbocicle
1 By request
2 x 18 m3;
360
hydrocarbons
-tar
1 115 t/day
2 x 45 m3;
900
1 x 100 m3;
1000
7.2.2
Tar distillation
-"-
-"-
-coal tar
1 130 t/day
Reservoirs:
1 x 100 m3;
1000
1 x 200 m3;
2000
4 x 1000 m3;
40000
-fire mixture
2 105 t/day
3 x 100 m3;
30000
1 x 200 m3;
20000
-antracene oils
3 -
2 x 400 m3;
2 x 400 m3;
800000
-naphthalene
3 -
3 x 50 m3;
150000
fraction
1 x 76 m3;
76000
-light oil
2 By request
2 x 18 m3;
3600
2 x 59 m3;
11800
7.3
Metallurgical fireproof
-"-
-"-
Lime and dolomite
-phosphoric
1
Reservoirs:
products plant
production
acid
6 x 10 m3;
600
7.4
Cold rolled products
-"-
-"-
Cold rolled metal
- H2SO4
1
Reservoirs:
2 x 125 m3;
2500
plant
products
3 x 125 m3;
2 x 20 m3;
400
-HCl
1
2 x 60 m3;
1 x 100 m3;
1000
2 x 100 m3;
- solution
0
2 x 300 m3;
600
-used solution
0
2 x 300 m3;
600
Page 3 of 10
ARS Bulgaria
7.5
Mechanization and
-"-
-"-
Transport
-diesel fuel
2
Reservoirs:
transport
1 x 313 261 l;
31326
7.5.1
New oil station
1 x 31 383 l;
31338
7.5.2
Old oil
- petroleum
2
1 x 31695 l;
3170
station
1 x 31 470 l;
3147
- petroleum
2
Reservoirs:
1 x 24520 l;
2452
1 x 10512 l
1051
1 x 10680 l
1068
7.6
Railway management
-"-
-"-
Railway services
-petroleum
2
4 x 8 m3;
3200
department
1 x 30 m3;
3000
1 x 10 m3;
1000
-heavy
2
Reservoirs:
petroleum
3 x 50 m3;
15000
-used oils
fraction
2
1 x 5 m3;
500
-diesel fuel
2
1 tank
7.7
Energy management
-"-
-"-
Electric energy and
0
department
vapor production; repair
and services of el.
equipment and water
7.7.1
Heavy petroleum fraction
supply system
unit I
7.7.2
Heavy petroleum fraction
unit II
7.7.3
Water preparatory
Reservoirs:
installation for softening
and desalting ? 1
1 x 5000 m3;
5000
2 x 1000 m3;
2000
7.7.4
Water preparatory
Reservoirs:
installation for softening
and desalting ? 2
2 x 5000 m3;
10000
- H2SO4
1
Tanks:
1 x 60 m3;
600
1 x 50 m3;
500
1 x 25 m3;
250
-NaOH
1
3 x 10 m3;
300
1 x 20 m3;
200
1 x 60 m3;
600
-salt solution
0
1 x 100 m3;
100
6 x 10 m3;
60
1 Tank x 100 m3
100
7.8
Chief mechanic
-"-
-"-
Equipment and spare
directorate
parts production; repair
and services
Page 4 of 10
and services
ARS Bulgaria
7.8.1
Oil regeneration station
-fresh oils
2
Reservoirs :
17 x 25 m3;
42500
1 x 18 m3;
1800
-used oils
2
6 x 20 m3;
12000
7.9
Tailing pond for ore
Lesnovska river - 1 ?m -"-
Landfill for hazardous
Chemical
1
Slag deposit:
Area 1847,9 .103 m2 After the
processing and ore-
northeast to v.
waste slag and waste content of the
618605 t /year
third stage of
dressing
Chelopechene
water from ore
slag: Fe-
1999;
construction
processing and ash from 27,4%;
to elevation
filters
CaO 3%;
309302,5 m3
539- there
MgO- 1,4%;
Deposit till now
will be
3093025
Pb 0,5%;
25005341 t/
enough place
1.3E+08
12502670 m3
for storage
SiO
slag till year
2-6,4%;
Mn- 5,3%;
2011.
Ba-3,3%;
Chemical
content of
treated water
in mg/l:
ammonia
0,54-1,66; Fe
0,26-2,34; Mn
0,19-0,43;
7.10
Slag dam Kremikovtzy Between villages of D.
-"-
Landfill: slag, phenol
Chemical
1 Volume of the
Slag dam
About
1.4E+07
Bogrov, G. Bogrov;
wastewater , emulsions
content of slag
deposit sludge -
1,4.106 m3
Musachevo; near
in % - water
9000000 m3; water
Lesnovska river
26,8;Mn-
volume of sludge -
1,27;Cu-0,21;
600000 m3
Cr-0,40; P-
0,04; Pb
0,64; Fe-28,8;
Ca 8,34; Mg
0,73; Si-
12,06; Al
1,10; Na-
0,16; K-0,22;
Ba-0,35; Ni-
0,03;
Chemical
Total capacity about
1.1E+08
content of
11.106 m3
drainage water:
Nitrite 0,1-
0,48; ammonia
4-35;
phenols 0-
1,9; cyanides
0,02-0,78
Page 5 of 10
ARS Bulgaria
7.11
Drainage and storm
On the right bank of
-"-
Drainage and storm
Hazardous
1
Flow- 40 1000 l/s. 2 ponds x 7500 m3
5000 m3
50000
waste water treatment
Lesnovska river
waste water treatment,
substances
About 960 l/s flow
plant
Chelopechene village,
waste water over -flow sludge from
to Botunetz lake
Sofia region
treatment
industrial
and use for
treated water.
industrial water
Chemical
supply. Chemical
content %:
content of treated
water: ammonia
0,3-1,56;
cyanides 0,01-
0,08; phenols 0-
0,05; petroleum
products 2-8;
Fe-32,8;
Fe-0,26 2,88;
Mn- 0,95;
Mn- 0,07-0,25;
Pb 0,45;
Zn 0,5;
Stored till now :
Cu-0,08; S-
57000 t/ 14250 m3
142500
0,55;
Organic
substances
29,2
4 drying beds x 3000 5000 m3
50000
m3
7.12
Waste water treatment
On the right bank of
-"-
Treatment of wastewater Chemical
1
Sludge as a result
plant
Lesnovska river, 4 km of
from the factory premises content of the
of treatment.
Kremikovtzi area
(50 l/s). Treatment of
treated water
Additional
municipal waste waters in mg/l:
treatment in drying
(30 l/s) from
Ammonia
beds situated in the
Kremikovtzi, Buhovo
0,26-1,50;
factory premises.
and Seslavtzi regions.
cyanides
Treated sludge is
0,01; heavy
used for manure in
metals-
agriculture.
Fe-0,06 0,74;
Mn- 0-0,16;
8.0
Plama AD, Town of
T. Pleven
Vit river (35 ?m),
Petroleum production
Petroleum
2
Ponds- total capacity
50% Possible
1000000 1455500
About 10000 m3 of
6.2
Pleven
tributary of Danube river and processing
products
petroleum products 111 940 m3, full with
pollutio
(km 616)
in tanks
45 550m3 water and
n risk in
455500
petroleum products
flood
9.0
period
Petroleum product base- v. Somovit , Pleven
Danube river (km 612)
Loading / unloading of
Petroleum
2
About 2 500 m3 of 10 reservoirs.1 000 m3
75% Possible
1000000 1000000
6.0
Somovit Petrol AD,
region
petroleum products
products
pollutio
petroleum products
Pleven
n risk in
flood
period
10.0
Ideal standard Bulgaria T.Sevlievo, Gabrovo
Rositza river (39),
Ceramics production,
BaCO3
1
20 t
Storage in paper
200000 214000
5.3
AD,
region
tributary of Yantra river ( plumbing products
packages. 50 kg
Vabko Standard trein .
87), Tributary of Danube
Plastic tanks. 200 l
43,42%; American
river(540)
Standard Inc.-
31,08%; American
Compressor
1,075 t
Standard International
oils
Inc. 25,49%
Tanks x 200 l
Page 6 of 10
ARS Bulgaria
Epoxide resin
1400 t
14000
and solvents
Ion exchange
substances
In paper packages. 25
kg
0,400 t
11.0
Petrol AD, town of
T. Pavlikeny
Rositza river (69),
Storage, loading/
Petrol
2 -
Metal reservoirs
100%
6000
3.8
Pleven
tributary to Yantra river ( unloading of petroleum
Veliko Tarnovo region
87), Tributary to Danube products
Gasoline
20 t
97%
2000
river(540)
Diesel fuel
40 t
96%
4000
Mineral oils
100%
12.0
Vidima AD-1
T. Sevlievo,
Rositza river (39),
Plumbing products
H2SO4
1 4t
Tank
40
340
2.5
Gabrovo region
tributary of Yantra river (
HCl
4t
Tank
40
87), tributary of Danube
Bisulphite
4t
Tank
40
river(540)
HNO3
4t
Tank
40
NaOH
4t
Tank
40
used oils
4t
Tank
40
other acids
10 m3
reservoir
100
13.0
Vidima AD-2
v.Gradnitza , Gabrovo
Vidima river (22),
Plumbing products
H2SO4
1 1t
Plastic tanks
10
80
1.9
region
tributary of Rositza river
HCl
1t
Plastic tanks
10
(74), tributary of Yantra
NaOH
1t
Plastic tanks
10
river ( 87), Tributary of
Bisulphite
1t
Plastic tanks
10
Danube river(540)
used oils
4t
Tank
40
14.0
Sugar factory AD
T.Gorna Orjahovitza,
1
Veliko Tarnovo region
Alcohol factory
Second category gully,
Alcohol production
Sludge
-
Waste
situated on 1,2 km of
water
Yantra river, tributary of
flow
Yantra river(120),
18,45
tributary of Danube
l/s
river(540)
15.0
Sugar factory, Energy
-"-
-"-
Heat and energy
Slag and ash
0
30 t / d
600 000 m3
10%
600000 600000
5.8
department
production
16.0
Sugar Factory ,
-"-
-"-
Sugar production by
Sludge
0
30 t / d
120 000 m3
50%
120000 120000
5.1
Biological drying beds
diffusion technology
17.0
"Arkus" AD
T. Ljaskovetz, Veliko
Broda gully , 5 km of
Mechanical and thermal HCl,
1
36 t
Plastic tanks (4 m3)
360
62783
4.8
Tarnovo region
discharging in
processing of metals;
H2SO4,
4 t
40
Dobridjalsky dam,
metal production
NaOH,
11 t
110
tributary of Yantra river
Calcinated
5 t
Tanks (50, 100, 200 l)
50
(107), tributary of
paint and
9 t
90
Danube river(540)
oils,
acetone,
92 t
920
technical
alcohol,
petrol,
0,080 t
Fuel and petroleum
products storage
diesel fuel,
0,500 t
Tank
5
heavy
petroleum
fractions
0,256 t
Tank
3
148 t
Tank
50%
1480
1567 t
Reservoirs
15670
Page 7 of 10
ARS Bulgaria
4 tanks with total
20000
capacity 2000 t
Ba(Cl)2,
1
0,125 t
Storage for chemicals
70%
40
Fe2O5,
2,572 t
Hg,
0,008 t
SnCl4,
0,084 t
KOH,
0,122 t
Copper
0,066 t
Sodium nitrate,
1,000 t
Sodium sulfite,
Chromic
0,542 t
Zn(Cl)2
0,075 t
5
1,000 t
10
Hazardous
3
Used
20 t
Storage
20000
Sludge from
Sludge
3 t
Drying beds
3000
1 t
Temporary place
1000
18.0
Sviloza AD,
T. Svishtov
Danube river (558 ?m)
-sulphate bleached
Paint
0
4 t
Storage
-
4 1.8E+07
7.3
cellulose;
and slag dam
-synthetic silk;
0,25 t/d
-electric energy
Lubricants
0
4 t
Storage
-
4
production;
-heat production
0,31 t/d
Heavy
2
150 t
Reservoirs
3800 m3
380000
petroleum
16,5 t/d
capacity 4000 m3
fractions
Sodium
1
220 t
Reservoirs
2000 m3
200000
hydroxide
70 t/d
capacity 2390 m3
HCl
1
320 t
Reservoirs
-
9,6 t/d
capacity 320 m3
3200
Sodium
1
100 t
Storage
-
1000
chlorate
3,8 t/d
SO2
1
20 t
Reservoir
50 m3
500
0,23 t/d
capacity 100 m3
H2SO4
1
500 t
Reservoir
1300 m3
13000
1,6 t/d
capacity 1800 m3
Chlorine acetic
1
24 t
Storage
-
240
acid
2,6 t/d
Carbon
1
80 t
Reservoirs
400 m3
4000
disulphide
4,77 t/d
capacity 500 m3
Ammonia
2
32 t
Refrigerators- 90 t
-
9000
0,33 t/d
Slag and ash
0
1500000 t
Slag dam
1,6 . 106 m3 Side by
1600000
107 t/d
3 . 106 m3
side
Gas
1
68500 t
Slag dam
1,6. 106 m3 storage
16000000
purification
18 t/d
3 . 106 m3
and
disposal
19.0
Toploficatcia Veliko
T. Veliko Tarnovo
sludge
From sewerage system to Heat production
Heavy
2
1400, 80
Reservoir 7400
80% -
6.0
Tarnovo EAD, state
Veliko Tarnovo region
Yantra river (132),
petroleum
Concrete reservoir -
950000
950000
owned
tributary of Danube river
fractions
9500
20.0
Toploficatcia Gabrovo T. Gabrovo, Gabrovo
Yantra river (177),
Heat and electricity
Heavy
2
700 t
12 000 m3
93%
1200000 1200000
6.1
EAD, state owned
region
tributary of Danube river production
petroleum
(540)
fractions
Page 8 of 10
ARS Bulgaria
21.0
Tonel Ltd.
T. Polsky Trambesh,
Eliya river (8), tributary Trade of petroleum
Petroleum
2
20 t
Reservoir 1800 m3
90%
180000 2150000
6.3
Veliko Tarnovo region
of Yantra river
products
products
22.0
Agromedica- Chimsnab T. Gorna Oryahovitza,
Yantra river 3 km, Trade of liquid chemicals -
1
None
Reservoirs :
11500
4.1
AD,
Veliko Tarnovo region
tributary of Danube river
(Joint stock company)
(540)
6 x 100 m3= 600 m3
6000
11 x 50 m3= 550 m3
5500
23.0
"Trema" AD
T. Tryavna, Gabrovo
Trevnenska river (13),
Mechanical processing of H2SO4
1
Tank - 3 m3
Tank - 3 m3
Trema
30
3090
3.5
(Joint stock company) region
tributary of Yantra
munitions
HCl
1
"
"
does not
30
river(138), tributary of
have
Danube river(540)
NaOH
1
"
"
tanks
30
larger
Cr6+
3
"
"
3000
than
24.0
"Orgachim" AD
East industrial area of
Danube river
Paint, varnish, synthetic -octanol
1 200 t ; -
250 m3
-
2500
27500
4.4
Rousse,
resin
(Joint stock company) Rousse region
(?m 488.800)
1
-o-xilol
1 600 t; 60 t/d
2500 m3
25%
25000
25.0
Toplofikatzia Rousse
t. Rousse, Rousse region Danube river
Heat and electricity
-HCl
1 120 t;2 t/day
240 m3
50%
2400 1103890
6.0
? ? D,
production
state owned
(?m 489)
-"-
- NaOH
1 110 t;1,8 t/day
25 m3
50%
250
-"-
-FeCl3
0 77 t;0,4 t/day
124 m3
60%
1240
Highly
flammable
liquids
-heavy
2 2558 t; 5,5 t/day
2 x 3000 m3
30%
600000
petroleum
fractions
1 x 5000 m3
500000
26.0
"Orgachim" AD
West industrial area of
Beli Lom river (5),
Paints, varnish, synthetic -octanol
1 83t;15t/day
100 m3
-
1000
1700
3.2
the town of Rousse,
tributary of Roussenski resin
(Joint stock company) Rousse region
Lom river (29), Tributary
-"-
of Danube river (490)
-solvent
0 50 t; 8t/day
700 m3
-
700
27.0
"Zhiti"AD (Joint stock Rousse,
-"-
Metal products
-H2SO4
1 147 t; 1t/day
100 m3
20%
1000
1000
3.0
company)
Rousse region
28.0
"Balkan- Pharma"AD
T. Razgrad, Razgrad
Beli Lom river (58),
Production of drugs and -HNO3
1 36 t;
100 m3
70%
1000 1055600
6.0
(Joint stock company) region
tributary of Roussenski pharmaceutical materials
1 0,39 t/day
Lom river (29), tributary
of Danube river (490)
-HCl
1 120 t ; 0,72 t/day
160 m3
35%
1600
1
-butylacetate
1 70 t; 2 t/d
300 m3
80%
3000
-heavy
2 2100 t; -
10 500 m3
80%
1050000
petroleum
fractions
29.0
"Amilum-Bulgaria" AD T. Razgrad, Razgrad
Lipnik dam near Beli
Corn processing
-HCl
1 213 t;
378 m3
50%
3780
16460
4.2
(Joint stock company) region
Lom river (62), tributary
6,84 t/per day
of Roussenski Lom river
(29), Tributary of
-"-
Danube river (490)
Page 9 of 10
ARS Bulgaria
Danube river (490)
-NaOH
1 268 t;
378 m3
50%
2680
7,29 t/day
Highly
flammable
liquids
-industrial
2 90 t; -
100 m3
50%
10000
gasoline and
petrol
Summe
3.7E+08
8.6
Abbreviation:
t. =>Town
v. =>Village
Page 10 of 10
ARS Romania
ARS Romania
THE INVENTORY OF THE USERS WITH STORAGE CAPACITY OF POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES IN CRISURI HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN
No.
Location/
Receiving
Company's
Type of
Toxic
Storage
Total quantity WRC
WR-3
Summ
WRI
Company/ owner district
watercourse;
activity field
dangerous
properties WRC facilities
handled/
CNCAF
MINVEST, SC
Devamin SA,
ores mining and
Branch Mine Brad
processing/
cyanides, heavy
8,700,000 m3
- UP Gura-barza, Brad/
flotation
metals (Pb, Zn,
flatland pond; ~ 10,875,000
1 Rabita Pond (P)
Hunedoara
Crisul Alb (41,5)
procedures
Cu, Mn)
R50-53
slag made dam tones*
1
108,750,000
108,750,000
8.0
CNCAF
MINVEST, SC
nonferrous ores
Devamin
mining and
SA,Branch Mine
processing/
cyanides, heavy
2,553,000 m3
Baita - UP Baita,
Crisul Baita(13)
flotation
metals (Pb, Zn,
flatland pond; ~ 3,191,250
2 Fanate Pond (P)
Stei/ Bihor
CrisulNegru (27) procedures
Cu)
R50-53
slag made dam tones*
1
31,912,500
31,912,500
7.5
Lower Risk Spots
CNCAF Minvest,
mine waters;
SC Devamin SA,
unsuitable
Branch Mine Brad
capacity of
- Sector Mine
Brad/
copper and gold heavy metals (Pb,
wastewater
3 Barza (P)
Hunedoara
Crisul Alb (31,5)
ore mining
Zn, Cu, Mn)
R51-53
treatment
2
CNCAF Minvest,
SC Devamin SA,
Valea
copper and gold
coastal pond;
storage
EM Brusturi - UP
Banestilor (0,6)
ore mining and
heavy metals (Pb,
slag dam
495000 m3 ~
4 Lucsoara (P)
Halmagiu/ Arad Crisul Alb (70)
processing
Zn, Cu)
R51-53
745000 m3
618750*
1
6,187,500
6.8
Valea lui Vasile
(10)
SC Bauxita Min
Topa (25) bauxite ore mining
coastal pond
SA Dobresti pond
Holod (37)
and processing/ susspended solids
dam 3800000
5 I (P)
Dabresti/ Bihor Crisul Negru(80)
flotation
containing Fe
R52
m3
1,800,000
1
18,000,000
7.3
SC Nutrientul SA
Ciumeghiu Farm
Channel Barmond
oxigen consumer
6 (S)
Palota/ Bihor
(0,6)
chicken farm
substances
R52
earth dam
7200*
1
72,000
4.9
suspensions,
oxygen consumer
RA Apaterm,
substances, heavy
cleaning station
metals (Cu, Zn,
and biological
Crisul
cleaning urban
Cr), cyanides,
2 biological
7 pond (S)
Oradea/ Bihor
Repede(121)
wastewaters
phenols
R50-53
ponds
3
Page 1 of 11
ARS Romania
producing of
dig out and
SC Sinteza SA,
Crisul
inorganic
heavy metals (Cu,
sealed pnd
8 luquid storage (P) Oradea/ Bihor
Repede(129,1)
pigments
Zn, Cr), cyanides R50-53
590000m3
437500*
1
4375000
6.6
suspensions,
oxygen consumer
substances,
SC Suinprod SA,
Crisul
intensive livestock ammonium,
2 biological
9 biological pond (S) Palonta/ Bihor
Repede(125)
rising hogs
suspensions
R52
ponds
2
SN Petrom SA,
oil products,
Branch Suplacu
Suplacu de
chlorides, phenols,
oil residues
10 de Barcau (S)
Barcau/ Bihor
Barcau (50,5)
oil extraction
ammonium
R50-53
pond 40000 m3 43750*
1
437,500
5.6
SN Petrom SA,
Branch Suplacu
oil residues
de Barcau and
oil and gas
oil products,
pond 131000
11 Gas Marghita (S) Marghita/ Bihor Barcau (77)
extraction
chlorides, phenols R50-53
m3
140000*
1
1400000
6.1
oil residues
pond 40000
m3; pond for
oil products,
dangerous
SC Petrolsub SA Suplacu de
phenols,
situations
40000*
12 (P)
Barcau/ Bihor
Barcau (51,6)
oil processing
ammonium
R50-53
13200 m3
12500*
1
52500
525,000
5.7
mineral oil and
oil products
SC Petrol Derna
bitumen
residues, phenols,
oil residues
13 SA (P)
Derna
Valea Derna (1,9) producing
ammonium
R50-53
pond
5875*
1
5,875
58,750
4.8
* approximation of quantity (tones) multiplying the storage capacity (m3) with a density of 1.25 g/cm3
Page 2 of 11
ARS Romania
THE INVENTORY OF THE USERS WITH STORAGE CAPACITY OF POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES IN MURES HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN
No.
Location/
Receiving
Company's
Type of
Toxic
Storage
Total quantity WRC
WR-3
Summ
WRI
Company/ owner district
watercourse;
activity field
dangerous
properties WRC facilities
handled/
slag made
SC BICAPA SA
Tarnaveni/
inorganic salts
CN+
dam; stalling
storage
1 (pond) (P)
Mures
Tarnava Mica(136) preparation
Cr6+
R50-53
pond
1,000,000
1
10,000,000
7.0
stalling pond
heavy metals
valley with
EM ABRUD
V. Sesei(22)
acid solution
anrocaments
storage
2 (pond) (P)
Abrud Alba
Aries(66)
nonferrous
suspensions
R50-53
dam
27,568,400
1
275,684,000
8.4
storage
EM Rosia
V.Salistei(22)
heavy metals
stalling pond
6666700 m3 ~
Montana (pond)
Rosia Montana/ Abrud(17)
gold ores mining acid solution
valley with rock 8333375*
3 (P)
Alba
Aries(49)
and processing
suspensions
R50-53
dam
407000
1
87,403,750
7.9
V.Cusii(1)
gold and complex
EM Baia de Aries Baia de Aries/ V.Sartas(5)
ores mining and cyanides
valley pond with
4 (pond) (P)
Alba
Aries(74)
processing
suspensions
R50-53
slag made dam
436,000
1
4,360,000
6.6
storage
8,000,000;
gold and complex heavy metals
operation
EM Coranda
Certej/
Certej(16)
ores mining and suspensions
valley pond with volume
5 Certej (pond) (P) Hunedoara
Mures(484)
processing
mine waters
R50-53
slag made dam 4800000 tones
1
12,800,000
128,000,000
8.1
Lower Risk Spots
compounds of
SC AZOMURES Tg. Mures/
mineral fertilizers phosphorous and
6 SA pond (P)
Mures
Mures (201)
production
nitrogen
R52
flatland pond
250000*
1
2,500,000
6.4
SC UPSOM SA
Ocna Mures/
sodium - chloride chloride; NH4+;
7 pond (P)
Alba
Mures (306)
production
NH3+
R52
flatland pond
718750*
1
7,187,500
6.9
ferrous ores and
Baisoara (6 km
cuartz sand
NV from Iara)/
mining and
coastal clay
storage
8 EM Iara pond (P) Cluj
Iara
processing
suspensions; Fe2+ R50
pond
4546000
1
45,460,000
7.7
complex and gold
EM Zlatna pond
ore mining and
heavy metals;
coastal pond ; storage
9 (P)
Zlatna/ Alba
Ampoi (24)
processing
suspended solids R50-53
rock made dam 200000 m3
1
2500000
6.4
complex
Deva/
V. Devei (1) nonferrous mining heavy metals;
flatland pond; storage
10 EM Deva pond (P) Hunedoara
Mures (490)
processing
suspended solids R52; R51-53
slag made dam 9500000 m3
1
118750000
8.1
Page 3 of 11
ARS Romania
organic
SC SUINTEST
substances;
SA Gornesti -
Gronesti/
ammonium;
4 biological
11 biological pond (S) Mures
Mures (176)
hogs farm
suspended solids R52
ponds
393750*
1
3,937,500
6.6
* approximation of quantity (tones) multiplying the storage capacity (m3) with a density of 1.25 g/cm3
No.
Location/
Receiving
Company's
Type of
Toxic
Storage
Total quantity WRC
WR-3
Summ
WRI
Company/ owner district
watercourse;
activity field
dangerous
properties WRC facilities
handled/
National Company
of Uranium SA
Jitin (12)
water mine with
storage basin
Bucharest Banat
Caras (30)
natural uranium
Lisava;
625*
Oravita
Lisava (20
and radium 226;
R45
storage basin 250*
1 Department(P)
Oravita CS
Caras (14)
uranium mining
NaOH
R21
Ciudanovita
0.720
1
8760
3.9
Department of
"Group for the
program of mining
closure" Deva -
nonferrous ores floating slag with
flatland pond;
2 Sasca mine (P)
Sasca CS
Nera (47)
mining
Cu, Ni, Mn, Pb, Zn R50-53
slag made dam
4,195,987
1
41,959,870
7.6
SC Moldomin SA Moldova Noua Danube (1044 km nonferrous ores floating slag with
Lunca Dunarii
3 (P)
CS
navigable)
mining
Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn
R50-53
pond
37,123,000
1
371,230,000
8.6
metallic tanks 4
SC Cantara SA
Ciclova
Ciclova (30)
x 400 hl; 1 x
4 (S)
Montana CS
Caras (5)
food industry
spoiled beer
100 hl
170
0
170
170
2.2
* approximation of quantity (tones) multiplying the storage capacity (m3) with a density of 1.25 g/cm3
Page 4 of 11
ARS Romania
THE INVENTORY OF THE USERS WITH STORAGE CAPACITY OF POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES IN SOMES-TISA HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN
No.
Location/
Receiving
Company's
Type of
Toxic
Storage
Total quantity WRC
WR-3
Summ
WRI
Company/ owner district
watercourse;
activity field
dangerous
properties WRC facilities
handled/
storage 3 x 20
SC TERAPIA SA Cluj-Napoca/
Somesul Mic (82)
m3 ~ 3 x 25
1 (P)
Cluj
Somes (244)
drugs production cyanides
R50
3 decianuration =75*
2
8000
3.9
precious metal
mining and
cyanides, heavy
SC AURUL SA
Baia Mare/
Lapus (5,2) processing/
metals (Pb, Zn,
flatland pond;
2 (P)
Maramures
Somes (85)
cianuration
Cu, Mn)
R50-53
slag made dam
2,400,000
1
24,000,000
7.4
nonferrous ores
mining and
Cisla (9,8) processing/
SM BORSA Colbu Baia Mare/
Viseu (63) flotation
flatland pond;
3 Pond (P)
Maramures
Tisa (59)
procedures
heavy metals
R50-53
slag made dam
2,880,000
1
28,800,000
7.5
nonferrous ores
Novat (10)
mining and
Vaser(12)
processing/
SM BORSA Novat Baia Mare/
Viseu (41) flotation
flatland pond;
4 Pond (P)
Maramures
Tisa (59)
procedures
heavy metals
R50-53
slag made dam
1,810,000
1
18,100,000
7.3
nonferrous ores
SM BAIA MARE
mining and
UP Central
processing/
cyanides, heavy
Flotation Unit,
Baia Mare/
Lapus (5,2) flotation
metals (Pb, Zn,
flatland pond;
5 UPSasar (P)
Maramures
Somes (95)
procedures
Cu, Mn)
R50-53
slag made dam
41,000,000
1
410,000,000
8.6
reservoir;
SC ALLIED
Sasar (13,5) nonferrous
heavy
sludge basin
DEALS PHOENIX Baia Mare/
Lapus (6) smelting, reactive metals,sulfuric
R14R21 2600 m3 ~
3250
32500
6 SA (P)
Maramures
Somes (95)
production
acid
R50-53
3250*
10000
1 100000
132,500
5.1
nonferrous ores
mining and
SM BAIA MARE
Sasar (19) processing/
BM Baia Sprie
Baia Sprie/
Lapus (6) flotation
flatland pond;
7 (pond) (P)
Maramures
Somes (95)
procedures
heavy metals
R50-53
slag made dam
13,221,000
1
132,210,000
8.1
nonferrous ores
mining and
SM BAIA MARE
Cavnic (24,5)
processing/
EM Cavnic (pond) Cavnic/
Lapus (37,7) flotation
flatland pond;
8 (P)
Maramures
Somes (95)
procedures
heavy metals
R50-53
slag made dam
850,000
1
8,500,000
6.9
intermedia-ry
storage for
packed silt;
Baia Mare
mine waters;
EM AURUM Ilba (Ilba)/
Ilba (7)
nonferrous ores heavy metals from
unproper
9 Sector (P)
Maramures
Somes (84,5)
processing
mine waters
R50-53
purification
1
Page 5 of 11
ARS Romania
Firiza(5)
mine waters;
SM BAIA MARE-
Sasar(14)
reduced and
EM Herja (pond) Baia Mare/
Lapus(6)
nonferrous ores
unproper
10 (P)
Maramures
Somes (95)
processing
heavy metals
R50-53
purification
1
complex
CMNPN REMIN
Turt (18)
nonferrous ores
2,200,000 m3~
BAIA MARE- EM
Tur (68) mining without
heavy metals (Cu, R 43, 47, 50
2,750,000
11 Turt (pond) (P)
Turt/ Satu Mare Tisa (820)
processing
Pb, Zn)
R 54-58
tones*
2,750,000
1
27,500,000
7.4
V.Rosie(3,5)
mine waters;
Baia Mare
Baita(12)
reduced and
EM AURUM
(Nistru)/
Lapus(2)
nonferrous ores heavy metals from
unproper
12 Nistru Section (P) Maramures
Somes (95)
processing
mine waters
R50-53
purification
1
stalling pond:
6,300,000 slag
valley - type
(at final quota
nonferrous ores
pond, with main +740 m)
CMNPN REMIN
mining and
dam built on
2,737,930
SA BAIA MARE-
processing
slag and
stored
Mining Sub-sidiary Rodna/ Bistrita Somesul Mare
(Zn,Pb); storage heavy metals (Pb,
aditional toc
quantity, until
7,875,000
13 Rodna (pond) (P) Nasaud
(560)
of the salg
Zn)
R50-53
dam
+720m quota
1 3,422,412 *
112,974,120
8.1
nonferrous ores
mining and
SM BAIA MARE-
processing/
EM Baiut (pond) Baiut/
Lapus(110) flotation
flatland pond;
14 (P)
Maramures
Somes (95)
procedures
heavy metals
R50-53
slag made dam
3,650,000
1
36,500,000
7.6
organic
SC SOMES SA,
pulp and paper
substances,
15 Dej (P)
Dej/ Cluj
Somes (233)
processing
lignine, tanine
R52
siltstorage
110
1
1,100
3.0
SC COMINEX
NEMETALIFERE
SA-Mining Sub-
Nadas(20) caolin sands and
sidiary Aghires
Somesul Mic (82)
metalurgic sands
16 (ponds) (P)
Aghires/ Cluj
Somes (244)
mining
suspensions
R52
3 stalling ponds
100,000
1
1,000,000
6.0
SC AGRO-
COMSUIN - SA
organic
BONTIDA
substances,
(biological ponds)
Somesul Mic (42)
amonium
4 biologic
17 (S)
Bontida/ Cluj
Somes (244)
pig farm
suspensions
R52
ponds
36,000
1
360,000
5.6
Lower Risk Spots
oxygen
sugar processing consummer
Postei (2)
from sugar beet substances;
SC ZAHARUL SA Carei/ Satu
Crasna (53)
by diffusion
susspended solids
flatland pond
18 (P)
Mare
Tisa (820)
technology
(CCOCr)
R52
120000 m3
95625*
1
956,250
6.0
Page 6 of 11
ARS Romania
oxygen
SC NUTRISAM
consummer
SA SATU MARE
substances;
hogs farm Moftin Moftin/ Satu
Crasna (66)
intensive livestock susspended solids
flatland pond
19 (S)
Mare
Tisa (820)
rising hogs
(CCOCr), phenols R52
6000 m3
3500*
1
35,000
4.5
* approximation of quantity (tones) multiplying the storage capacity (m3) with a density of 1.25 g/cm3
No.
Location/
Receiving
Company's
Type of
Toxic
Storage
Total quantity WRC
WR-3
Summ
WRI
Company/ owner district
watercourse;
activity field
dangerous
properties WRC facilities
handled/
organic
0.3 0.3
substances;
washing waters 0.10 0.10
SC ANTIBIOTICE
Bahlui (19) /
ammonium;
from ionic filters 0.6 0.6
1 IASI (P)
Iasi/ Iasi
Jijia (6)
0 chlorides; miceles R28, R50-53
in 2 tanks
0.3
3 0.3
1,325.0
3.1
No.
Location/
Receiving
Company's
Type of
Toxic
Storage
Total quantity WRC
WR-3
Summ
WRI
Company/ owner district
watercourse;
activity field
dangerous
properties WRC facilities
handled/
Phenols,
R26-27,
470 2 470
Ammonium,
R23,
129
129
Ammonium
R52,
4632
4632
carbonate,
R52,
120 120
Ammonium nitrate, R51,
60
60
Ammonium
R52,
320
320
sulfate,
R11,
284
284
Cyclohexanon,
R10,
330
330
Cyclohexanol,
R10
0
0
Cyclohexane,
R11,
70
70
Benzene, Hydroxyl R52,
153
153
anime sulfate,
R34,
1257
1257
Oleum, Chloride
R34,
169 169
acid, Nitric acid,
R24,
54 54
Residues
R23,
70
70
containing
R26-27,
166
166
phenols, Wastes R39-23-25
323 323
containing iron
R50
1306
131
SC FIBREX
fibers of
oxides, Catalysts
NYLON SA/
polyamide,
activ
RADICI Group
Savinesti UHE Chanel (8 )
ammonium
1 FIBRES (P)
Neamt
Bistrita (55)
sulfate
reservoirs
873800
5.9
R23
372 372
Ammonia R34
263
263
Nitrogen acid R34
90
90
Chloride acid R27-28
72
72
chemical
Sodium hydroxide
R55
0.06 0.06
SC AZOCHIM
fertilizers with
Hydrazine R55
reservoirs;
0.16
0.16
SA/ SC
Savinesti UHE Chanel (8 )
nitrogen and
Carbon
plastic
2 INTERAGRO (S) Neamt
Bistrita (55)
calcium carbonate tetrachloride
containers
1
7972
3.9
Page 7 of 11
ARS Romania
R55
reservoirs 2 x 100 2 100
Ethylene
R50
50 tones ;
3.7 0.37
carbonate
R25
plastic
0.3
0.003
Dibenzol
containers;
SC MELANA SA Savinesti UHE Chanel (8 )
acrylic fibers
isocyanate
plastic
3 (P)
Neamt
Bistrita (55)
producing
Polyethylene glycol
containers
10037
4.0
producing and
Sodium nitrate
R6
sacs; plastic
32 1 32
trading of fi-bers, Sodium chloride
R25
containers;
1.4 1.4
type wool and
metallic
185
185
Savinesti UHE Chanel (8 )
cotton from
reservoirs
4 SC REFIL SA (P) Neamt
Bistrita (55)
chemical fibers
2190
3.3
R34
reservoirs
2171 1 2171
Sulfuric acid,
R34
1500
1500
Phosphoric acid, R34
37* 37
phosphoric acid, Chloride acid,
R27/28
70 70
sulfuric acid and Sodium sulfate,
R11
5000
5000
SC SOFERT SA
chemical fertilizer Ammonia oil,
R23 12000
12000
5 Bacau (P)
Bacau
Bistrita (2)
producing
Ammonia formol
R55
120
120
208980
5.3
Organic sludge,
R53
2 sludge pond 2 x 107500* 1 1075
SC
Microelements
R58
86000 m3 and 1 89250*
1075
CHIMCOMPLEX Borzesti
(Cr, Yn, Fe)
reservoir
893
6 SA Borzesti (P)
Bacau
Trotus (60)
chemical industry inactive isomers
71400 m3
30430
4.5
R40/20/22 waste carbon
1
R26/27
and waste ca-
R52
talyst ponds
Wastewater
SC CAROM SA
Onesti
organic matters,
and sludge
7 Onesti (P)
Bacau
Trotus (60)
synthetic rubber
phenols, metals
pond
Oil sludge,
R11
1 1593
Phenols sludge
R26/27
1593
SC RAFO SA
Onesti
oil products
containing
R52
3 sludge pond
1593
8 Onesti (P)
Bacau
Trotus (60)
processing
microelements
127400 m3
3 x 159250*
47790
4.7
* approximation of quantity (tones) multiplying the storage capacity (m3) with a density of 1.25 g/cm3
Page 8 of 11
ARS Romania
THE INVENTORY OF THE USERS WITH STORAGE CAPACITY OF POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES IN ARGES HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN
No.
Location/
Receiving
Company's
Type of
Toxic
Storage
Total quantity WRC
WR-3
Summ
WRI
Company/ owner district
watercourse;
activity field
dangerous
properties WRC facilities
handled/
Organic
R52,
1,
substances,
R52,
1,
Suspensions,
R52,
1,
Chlorides, Sulfats, R52,
1,
Ammonium,
R25, R52,
1,
Cyanides,
R50,
2,
Phenols,
R50-53,
3,
Detergents, Oil R50-53
3
products,
Fe,
Cr6+,
Cu,
SN PETROM
Zn,
ARPECHIM
petrochemical
Cd
1 Pitesti (P)
Pitesti/ Arges
Dambovnic (62)
industry
Page 9 of 11
ARS Romania
THE INVENTORY OF THE USERS WITH STORAGE CAPACITY OF POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES IN JIU HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN
No.
Location/
Receiving
Company's
Type of
Toxic
Storage
Total quantity WRC
WR-3
Summ
WRI
Company/ owner district
watercourse;
activity field
dangerous
properties WRC facilities
handled/
Chemical
fertilizers
producing;
Methanol
producing
665 to/day and
facilities;
storage 3200
Ammonium
Methanol
900to/day and
producing
Ammonium;
storage 15000
facilities; Urea
Ammonium
900 to/day and
facilities;
chloride;
storage 10000-
Ammonia
Urea; R28, R50
reservoirs 5
15000
2
67 + 320
producing
ammonia
R25, R52
tones
900 to/day and 1
9 + 150
SN PETROM
facilities; Nitric
carbonate;
R25, R52
storage deposit
storage 4500
1
9 +150
DOLJCHIM
Jiu Amaradia
acid producing
ammonium nitrate;
R25, R52
storage deposit 720 to/day and 1
9 +45
1 Craiova (P)
Craiova/ Dolj
collector sewer
facilities
Acid waters
R25, R52
wagons (4,500) storage 3600
1
7 + 36
8020
3.9
Page 10 of 11
ARS Romania
THE INVENTORY OF THE USERS WITH STORAGE CAPACITY OF POTENTIALLY POLLUTING SUBSTANCES IN IALOMITA-BUZAU HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN
No.
Location/
Receiving
Company's
Type of
Toxic
Storage
Total quantity WRC
WR-3
Summ
WRI
Company/ owner district
watercourse;
activity field
dangerous
properties WRC facilities
handled/
SC ELECTRICA Fieni/
producing of
underground
1 (P)
Dambovita
Ialomita
electric lamps
galvanic slag
R52
storage
110
1
1100
3.0
light sources and
accessories
underground
2 SC ROMLUX (P) Targoviste
sewerage
production
chrome, fluor
R50-52
sealed storage
18
2
1,800
3.3
WINCONSIN
TURNING
Targoviste/
machinery
metallic
3 SYSTEM (P)
Dambovita
sewerage
contruction
galvanic slag
R50-52
containers
28
2
2,800
3.4
2 settling ponds
Targoviste/
with comparti-
4 SC COS (P)
Dambovita
Ilfov
metallurgy
acids
R52
ments
45
2
4,500
3.7
6metallic con-
88*
tainers of 50
and stored
9
ROMARM Mija
Mija/
machinery
chromic and
m3; concrete
6 x 6.25*
37.5
5 department (P)
Dambovita
Neagra
construction
cyanide slag
R50;R52
basin 50m3
6.25*
2 0.6
4,700
3.7
ROMARM Moreni Moreni/
metallic
6 department (P)
Dambovita
Cricovul Dulce
defence industry galvanic slag
R52
reservoirs
336
1
3,360.0
3.5
SNP Petrom
sealed ponds;
Petrobrazi
oil products
drying concrete 62500*
7 department (P)
Brazi/ Prahova onds, drying beds processing
oil residues
R52-53
beds
2200*
1
647,000
5.8
metallic
225000 and
R10; R23; R36; reservoirs 2 x stored 525;
SC AMONIL SA Slobozia/
chemical
Ammonium;
R37; R38; R8;
15000 t and 4 x 100000 and
8 (P)
Ialomita
Ialomita (52.4)
fertilizers
Nitrogen acid
R24; R25; R35
198 t
stored 197
1
3,250,000
6.5
0.015
20
ink, colors, sodium
62
SC COMCEH SA Calarasi/
hydroxide, oil,
bins, metallic
25
9 (P)
Calarasi
Borcea
paper producing
chloride acid
R52; R53
reservoirs
0.03
2
10700
4.0
Page 11 of 11
ARS Ukraine (no table received)
ARS Republic of Moldova
ARS Moldova
No
Name of
Location
Recipient
Company
Dangerous
WHC
Toxic
Total
Storage
Free
Remarks
Bezugsmen Water risk class Sum of water
Water risk
Company,
District
River
activities
Substances
Proper-ties amount
facilities
operational
ge (kg/l)
equivalent
risk class
index
Owner
volume
equivalents
1. Apa- Canal
Cahul
Prut
Waste-
Chlorine
N/a
N/a
N/a
low
(municipal
87 km
water treatment
property)
2. Oil-tank
Cahul
Prut
Storing and
Oil-products
2
5
Cisterns
9,700 m3
N/a
medium
970000
970000
6.0
(private
87 km
distributing
(28 units)
property,
"Lukoil)
3. Apa- Canal
Cantemir
Prut
Waste-water
Chlorine
2
4,800 tons Cylinders
N/a
Medium
480000
5.7
(communal
160 km
treatment
4. Thermal
Leova
Prut
Local heating
Oil products
2
5
N/a
Cisterns
N/a
low
network and
260 km
5. Oil-tank (private Leova, village
Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
N/a
Cisterns
N/a
low
property)
Iargara
260 km
distributing
6. Oil-tank (private Leova
Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
7.532t
Cisterns
N/a
medium
753200
5.9
property)
260 km
distributing
7. Petrol-station Leova
Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
N/a
Cisterns
N/a
low
(private
260 km
distributing
8. Apa- Canal
Leova
Prut
Waste-water
Chlorine
2
N/a
Cylinders
N/a
low
(communal
260 km
treatment
9. Oil-tank
Falesti
Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
Cisterns
3.800 m3
N/a
low
380000
5.6
(Private
472 km
depositing
(72 units)
property)
10.
Apa- Canal
Ungheni
Prut\
Waste-water
Chlorine
2
0.8t
Cylinders
N/a
low
80
1.9
(communal
387 km
treatment
property)
11.
Boiler- house
Ungheni
Prut
Heating supply
Fuel oil
2
5
7.000t
Cisterns
N/a
medium
700000
5.8
367 km
12.
Oil-tank
Ungheni
Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
500t
Cisterns
N/a
low
50000
5.9
"Feodora"
387 km
distributing
(private
property)
13.
Oil-tank
Ungheni
Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
1,000t
Cisterns
N/a
medium
100000
5.0
( state property)
387 km
distributing
14.
Petrol-station
Ungheni
Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
500t
Cisterns
N/a
low
50000
5.9
"Zagoros"
387 km
distributing
(private
property)
15.
Petro-station
Ungheni
Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
500t
Cisterns
N/a
low
50000
4.7
(private
387 km
distributing
property)
16.
Apa- Canal
Nisporeni
Prut
Waste
Chlorine
2
1.3t
Cylinders
N/a
low
1300
3.1
(communal
330 km
water treatment
property)
Page 1 of 2
ARS Moldova
17.
Oil-tank
Nisporeni
Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
800t
Cisterns
N/a
medium
80000
4.9
( state property)
330 km
distributing
18.
Apa-Canal
Nisporeni
Prut
Waste-water
Chlorine
2
0.3t
Cylinders
N/a
low
30
1.5
(communal
330 km
treatment
19.
Thermal
Hancesti
Prut
Heating
Fuel oil
2
5
200t
Cisterns
N/a
low
20000
4.3
network
( state property)
270 km
25
Oil-tank
Hancesti, village Prut
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
N/a
Cisterns
N/a
low
"Tirex-Petrol"
Lapusna
270 km
distributing
(private
property
20.
Pesticide
Hancesti
Prut
Storing and
Pesticide
3
2
N/a
Jerrycan
N/a
low
depository
distributing
( communal
270 km
4
Metal
property)
7 ( CuSO4)
containers
Plastic bags
21.
22 petrol
Hancesti
Prut
Storing and
Fuel
2
5
N/a
Cisterns
N/a
low
stations
distributing
( private
270 km
property)
22.
Oil-tank
Comrat
Yalpugh
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
N/a
Cisterns
N/a
low
(private
65km
distributing
property)
23.
Apa-Canal
Comrat
Yalpugh
Waste-water
Chlorine
2
N/a
Cylinders
N/a
low
(communal
65 treatment
property)
24.
Oil-tank
Ciadir- Lunga
Yalpugh
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
N/a
Cisterns
N/a
low
( private
30 km
distributing
property)
25.
Apa-Canal
Ciadir- Lunga
Yalpugh
Waste-water
Chlorine
2
N/a
Cylinders
N/a
low
(Communal
30 km
treatment
property)
26.
Apa-Canal
Vulcanesti
Cahul
Waste-water
Chlorine
2
N/a
Cylinders
N/a
low
(communal
20 km
treatment
propery)
27.
Petrol- stations Vulcanesti
Cahul
Storing and
Oil products
2
5
N/a
Cisterns
N/a
low
(3 units- private
20 km
distributing
property)
Summe
3634610
6.6
Page 2 of 2