INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATASHEET
APPRAISAL STAGE
I. Basic Information
Date prepared/updated: 02/23/2010
Report No.: AC4405
Public Disclosure Authorized
1. Basic Project Data
Country: China
Project ID: P090376
Project Name: GEF Shanghai Agricultural and Non-point Pollution Reduction Project
Task Team Leader: Takuya Kamata
GEF Focal Area: International waters
Global Supplemental ID:
Estimated Appraisal Date: August 17, 2009 Estimated Board Date: June 10, 2010
Managing Unit: EASCS
Lending Instrument: Specific Investment
Loan
Sector: Solid waste management (45%);General water, sanitation and flood protection
sector (45%);Sewerage (10%)
Theme: Rural services and infrastructure (40%);Rural policies and institutions
(40%);Pollution management and environmental health (20%)
Public Disclosure Authorized
IBRD Amount (US$m.):
0.00
IDA Amount (US$m.):
0.00
GEF Amount (US$m.):
4.79
PCF Amount (US$m.):
0.00
Other financing amounts by source:
BORROWER/RECIPIENT
0.00
Local Govts. (Prov., District, City) of Borrowing Country
30.08
30.08
Environmental Category: B - Partial Assessment
Simplified Processing
Simple []
Repeater []
Is this project processed under OP 8.50 (Emergency Recovery)
Yes [ ]
No [X]
Public Disclosure Authorized
or OP 8.00 (Rapid Response to Crises and Emergencies)
2. Project Objectives
The project development objective and global environment objective are to demonstrate
effective and innovative pollution reduction activities in Shanghai's rural areas in order to
reduce the rural/agricultural pollution load in the surface water flow to the East China
Sea. Key project outcome indicators include: (a) quantity of nitrogen, phosphorus,
ammonia, BOD, and COD discharged from GEF project sites; and (b) development of a
replication strategy. The proposed Project would focus on most serious and urgent
agricultural and non-point pollution issues prevailing in rural Shanghai and threatening to
East China Sea, i.e. (a) livestock wastes, (b) rural residential wastes, (c) agricultural
chemicals (chemical fertilizer, pesticide), and (d) crop straw. The proposed Project is
designed to develop and demonstrate effective and innovative approaches to address key
Public Disclosure Authorized
sources of non-point pollution in rural Shanghai. The Project would also be integrated
into the Municipal Government's mainstream programs and serve as a pilot under the
Shanghai Fourth-round Three-year Environmental Protection and Construction Action
Plan (2009-2011). This would ensure a greater potential for a municipality-wide and
long-term replication in Shanghai. The proposed Project takes a comprehensive approach
to integrate technological solutions, demonstration and replication, training and
dissemination to achieve the Project objective. The proposed Project would also pilot the
carbon emission reduction practice through anaerobic digestion of livestock wastes to
start addressing climate change issue in Shanghai.
3. Project Description
The proposed Project consists of four components with a total project cost estimated at
US$ 34.679 million (RMB 225.42 million equivalent). The project is expected to be
implemented in a period of three years. The proposed components and estimated costs
are summarized below.
Component 1: Livestock Waste Management Technology Demonstration (US$9.748
million)
(a)
Livestock waste management on large-scale farm (US$5.468 million). This sub-
component will support the establishment of a dairy waste treatment facility with a
capacity of 256 t/d on Shanghai Bright Holstan Jinshan Dairy Farm in Jinshan District,
which has about 5,000 dairy cattle. The facility would consist of a primary solid-liquid
separator, an acidification tank, a 22-day hydraulic retention time (HRT) mesophilic
anaerobic completely stirred tank reactor (CSTR), a "wet" type scrubbing biogas
collector. Biogas is combusted in two 250 kW reciprocating engine generators to
generate electricity power for energy sale to the local grid. Waste heat from the engines
will be transferred to the CSTR to maintain mesophilic operating temperatures. A biogas
fired hot water boiler will also be included to provide back-up heat for the CSTR when
the engines are not in operation. Sludge from the CSTR will be dewatered through a
secondary solid-liquid separator. An estimated 14 t/d of solid fraction from the CSTR
will undergo additional processing as organic fertilizer. About 238 m3/d liquid fraction
will be further treated on site through a series of lagoons prior to conveying to the
existing Langxia Wastewater Treatment Plant for final disposal. Some liquid fraction
may be used for fodder crops on farm either through pipes or a trucking scheme.
(b)
Livestock waste management on medium-scale farm (US$1.139 million). This
sub-component will support building a livestock waste treatment center comprising two
independent systems on Shanghai Shenye Cooperative in Chongming County with a total
of about 1,600 dairy cattle. The two independent systems would be: (i) a solid waste
management system of composting and pelletizing process, with a capacity of treating 50
tons of livestock waste per day; and (ii) a liquid waste management system, comprised of
a series of anaerobic and facultative lagoons with a 40 day HRT capable of treating 30
tons of livestock wastewater per day, prior to final disposal through land application.
Both systems will reduce human health risks posed by pathogens and virus transmission
from livestock to humans.
(c)
Integrated livestock and agricultural waste management (US$3.142 million).This
sub-component will support livestock and agricultural waste treatment in an integrated
approach in Qianwei Village of Shuxin Town in Chongming County. The proposed waste
treatment facilities would consist of a main system and an auxiliary system to treat wastes
of about 4,000 standing pigs, 2,500 tons of crop straw, 800 tons of municipal solid waste
(MSW), and 1,100 tons of rice chaff annually. In the main system, a series of inter-
connected digesters is proposed for the waste treatment. The first digester is a heated
(mesophilic) mixed concrete tank with separate gas storage also referred to as a CSTR.
The CSTR will digest the pig waste and MSW as these wastes are thicker and more
suitable for this type of digester. The second type of digester is an Up-flow Anaerobic
Sludge Blanket (UASB), which will digest the pre-treated liquid from crop straw waste.
Crop straw pre-treatment requires soaking the crop straw in the effluent from the CSTR
in order to acidify and transfer the volatile solids in the crop straw into the liquid phase.
Biogas from the CSTR and UASB is collected in separate gas storage. From the gas
storage, biogas will be scrubbed to remove corrosive hydrogen sulfide gas, and purified
biogas is then combusted in a 100 kW reciprocating engine generator for energy
production. Electric power will be used by the village and some gas will be used as a
household cooking fuel. The auxiliary system consists of two sub-systems, a gasification
plant to produce fuel gas, and a small biomass briquetting plant which is designed
specifically for treating rice chaff. About 30 m3/d liquid fraction will be further treated
by a series of lagoons of 40 days HRT prior to final disposal through land application.
Component 2: Wetland Demonstration for Pollution Reduction (US$3.343 million)
(a)
Rural town river-network wetland demonstration (US$1.468 million). This sub-
component will support (i) river network wetland ecological restoration engineering; and
(ii) construction of a vertical submerged wetland to collect and treat household sewage.
The sub-component will cover a total area of about 66.5 ha and restore a total length of
about 4,850 meters of river courses including Gujing, Miaojing, Lianqi and natural
interconnected waterways. The works would consist of: (1) construction of riverside belts
and vegetation buffers (47,300 m2); (2) restructuring of river beds (88,600 m2); (3)
connection of dead-end waterway and expansion of river cross section (265 meters); and
(4) construction of a vertical submerged reed-coarse sand wetland to collect and treat
household sewage (105 residents in 30 households).
(b)
Village wetland sewage treatment system (US$1.875 million). This sub-
component will support construction of six village wetland sewage treatment systems in
four villages of Qingpu district, which are located at the downstream of the Taihu basin.
Each proposed treatment demonstration system would consist of sewage collection
networks, a regulation tank, trickling filter pre-treatment, a secondary settling tank, and
wetland treatment process. The design capacity of the wetland sewage treatment systems
are 82 m3/d (Qianwan), 156 m3/d (Beiwangbang), 117 m3/d (Jintian), and 147 m3/d
(Xiezhuang), respectively.
Component 3: Integrated Agricultural Pollution Reduction Techniques (US$20.412
million)
(a)
Demonstration of the use of organic fertilizer (US$16.028 million). This sub-
component will demonstrate innovative techniques to reduce the utilization of chemical
fertilizers by promoting the alternative use of organic fertilizer at three selected
demonstration sites in Jinshan and Qingpu Districts and Chongming County as well as on
other farms to partially replace the use of chemical fertilizers. About 25 percent to 30
percent reduction in chemical fertilizer use is expected based on studies and experience
of Shanghai Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center (SATESC); this will
gradually help rehabilitate the soil structure at demonstration sites. The sub-component
will also promote accurate fertilizer application and use of crop-specific and nutrient-
customized fertilization to improve efficiency of chemical fertilizer and develop more
ecologically friendly and sustainable agriculture. Manure application techniques will be
demonstrated.
(b)
Demonstration of the scientific application of agricultural chemicals (US$3.443
million). This sub-component will promote usage of eco-friendly chemicals and
technologies to reduce pollution from agricultural chemicals (insecticides and pesticides)
at the same three selected demonstration sites in Jinshan and Qingpu Districts and
Chongming County. In particular, it involves using (i) high efficiency, low toxic, and
low residual effect chemicals; (ii) eco-friendly biological pesticides; (iii) upgraded
sprayers; and (iv) non-chemical technologies for insect and pest control, such as insect
net, moth-killing lamp, sticky paper, and sex-alluring agent.
(c)
Monitoring and extension (US$0.942 million). This sub-component will set up
about 120 check points at the three selected demonstration sites for on-site examination
and to collect samples for laboratory testing to monitor the effectiveness of the
demonstration technologies. The three demonstration sites under the Component have
also been selected as monitoring sites for the Shanghai Municipal long-term early
warning system for epidemics of plant disease, insects and pests. The sub-component will
provide training for participating farmers and technicians, and will extend successful
experience to localities beyond the demonstration sites to other parts of Shanghai through
training, workshops and SATESC's extension network. The sub-component will support
establishment of regular technology fairs as a platform for the private sector, diverse
service providers, regulatory agencies, farmers, input suppliers and researchers to provide
experience, introduce best practices, discuss regulatory options, and promote new
technologies.
Component 4: Project Management and Dissemination (US$1.176 million)
(a)
Project management (US$0.300 million). This sub-component will support
Project Coordination Group and the Shanghai Project Management Office (PMO) at the
municipal level, Working Groups at county/district level and those at the project
implementing agencies (PIAs) for efficient project management and implementation. The
sub-component aims to develop and strengthen the overall implementation capacity of
the various levels of project management entities in procurement, financial management,
monitoring and evaluation (M&E), reports preparation, etc., through provision of
adequate budgets for technical assistance, consultant services, training and incremental
operating expenses.
(b)
Replication strategy development, monitoring and evaluation (US$0.330 million).
A monitoring and evaluation system will be established at all PIAs. Results monitoring of
project outcome indicators will be carried out by an independent monitoring team hired
by the Shanghai PMO in accordance with terms of reference (TOR) acceptable to the
Bank. A project replication strategy will be developed under this sub-component.. Details
will be added to the replication strategy outline prepared by a consultant team and
reviewed by the Bank during project preparation and a draft replication strategy will be
prepared in the first year of project implementation. This draft strategy will be reviewed
for applicability and improvement during the second year of project implementation. The
replication strategy will be finalized at the completion of the project implementation.
Development of the replication strategy will be contracted out to an independent
institution selected by the Shanghai PMO in accordance with TOR acceptable to the
Bank. The final replication strategy will incorporate replication plans from all
participating district/county Working Groups.
(c)
Training and dissemination (US$0.546 million). This sub-component will be
implemented by the Shanghai Agricultural Broadcasting Television School (SABTVS).
This sub-component will provide training for the participating entities, local farmers,
students, professionals and government officials throughout the project implementation
period. The sub-component will disseminate information and experience obtained from
overall project implementation within project scope, to sector-wide coverage and to the
general public in Shanghai and China through the SABTVS's satellite broadcasting
network, broadband digital network and traditional classroom and on-site dissemination.
A project website will be developed as a platform for information circulation, experience
dissemination and a link to associated web sites, such as those of the World Bank, GEF,
PEMSEA, and GEF International Waters Learning Exchange and Resource Network
(IW:LEARN). A project video program has been planned to video-record project
implementation of all sub-projects at pre-implementation, during implementation and at
completion as a means for training and education and a tool for replication in future.
Seminars, workshops and an international technical exchange and dissemination
conference will be organized with the aim of replicating the project's demonstrated
technologies and practices in Shanghai, throughout China and beyond. Representatives
from PEMSEA will be invited to attend and help disseminate the experience and
workshop documents. The sub-component will finance Shanghai representatives to attend
conferences sponsored by GEF and PEMSEA, such as the biennial GEF International
Waters Conference and the triennial PEMSEA East Asia Seas Congress. The SABTVS
will also serve as a center of comprehensive information for the project.
4. Project Location and salient physical characteristics relevant to the safeguard
analysis
All project activities will be carried out within the jurisdiction of Shanghai Municipality.
Locations of most project activities have been identified as shown below.
Component 1: Livestock Waste Management Technology Demonstration
(a)
Large Scale Farm - Jinshan District
(b)
Medium Scale Farm - Chongming County
(c)
Integrated Livestock and Agricultural Waste Management - Chongming County
Component 2: Wetland Sewage Treatment System
(a)
Rural Town River-Network Wetland Demonstration - Jiading District
(b)
Village Wetland Sewage Treatment System - Qingpu District
Component 3: Integrated Agricultural Pollution Reduction Techniques
(a)
Promotion of Organic Fertilizer - Jinshan District, Qingpu District, Chongming
County
(b)
Scientific Application of Agricultural Chemicals - Jinshan District, Qingpu
District, Chongming County
(c)
Monitoring and Extension - Jinshan District, Qingpu District, Chongming County
Component 4: Project Management and Dissemination
(a)
Project Management - At municipal, county/district and PIA levels
(b)
Replication Strategy Development - At municipal, county/district and PIA levels
(c)
Training and Dissemination - At municipal, county/district and PIA levels
5. Environmental and Social Safeguards Specialists
Mr Yiren Feng (EASCS)
Mr Jun Zeng (EASCS)
6. Safeguard Policies Triggered
Yes No
Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01)
X
Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04)
X
Forests (OP/BP 4.36)
X
Pest Management (OP 4.09)
X
Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11)
X
Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10)
X
Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12)
X
Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37)
X
Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50)
X
Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60)
X
II. Key Safeguard Policy Issues and Their Management
A. Summary of Key Safeguard Issues
1. Describe any safeguard issues and impacts associated with the proposed project.
Identify and describe any potential large scale, significant and/or irreversible impacts:
OP4.01 Environmental Assessment: The Project is classified as a Category B project. An
Environment Assessment (EA) report was prepared by the East China Normal University
(ECNU) in accordance with national policies and regulations as well as safeguard
policies of the Bank. This EA Reports include (a) a consolidated project-wide EA (CEA)
report with detailed evaluation, covering all proposed project components; and (b) an
Environmental Management Plan (EMP). The EA Report has been prepared,
incorporating comments from the Bank, and found to be satisfactory.
The overall environmental impacts are clearly positive. However, some negative
impacts may result from project implementation, mainly during the construction phase.
These impacts include limited negative impacts on soil, air, water, acoustic environment,
flora, solid wastes and surrounding communities. These impacts will be temporary and
localized, and proper mitigation measures during construction and operation stage can
minimize or even eliminate them. Preventive and mitigation measures during the
construction and operation phases were prepared and are noted in the EA/EMP.
Pest Management (OP4.09): The Integrated Agricultural Pollution Reduction
Techniques Component, to be implemented by Shanghai Agricultural Extension and
Service Center (SAESC), will (i) disseminate the application of high efficiency, low
toxic, low residual effect chemicals and biological pesticides; (ii) prohibit the use of high
toxic, high residual effect pesticides and those not recommended on the World Health
Organization's Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to
Classification (Geneva: WHO 1994-95); (iii) reduce the reliance on organophosphorus
pesticides and other synthetic chemical pesticides; (iv) upgrade chemical spraying
equipments for increased efficiency; and (v) promote the use of non-chemical
technologies for insect and pest control. This component is expected to bring significant
benefits to the reduction of non-point sources pollution and food safety by greatly
reducing the amount of pesticide use. A Pest Management Plan (PMP) was prepared for
the project.
Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.12): According to the project proposals, all civil works
for Livestock Waste Management Technology Demonstration Component will be
conducted on the beneficiaries' own land, thus no land taking will be necessary. Wetland
Sewage Treatment System Component will cause involuntary resettlement for wetland
construction and accordingly social safeguards document is needed. Integrated
Agricultural Pollution Reduction Techniques Component and Project Management and
Dissemination Component will not involve any civil works, so these two components
will not trigger the policy and no RAP is needed. In accordance with Chinese laws and
Bank's requirements, an Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan (ARAP) was prepared in
Chinese and English by Shanghai PMO. The ARAP was approved by the Shanghai
Municipal Government and is available in the project file. The design institute and the
Shanghai PMO paid special attention to avoid or minimize land taking of the project. As
a result, all the land being taken are waste land in the villages under Qingpu Village
Wetland Sewage Treatment System subproject and the land taking had very little impact
on villager's livelihood.
2. Describe any potential indirect and/or long term impacts due to anticipated future
activities in the project area:
The project is expected to bring significant positive impacts to the natural and socio-
economic environment. The project as a whole is substantially positive in environmental
terms, with the benefits greatly overweighing the negative impacts. The implementation
of the project will result in a potential annual pollutant load reduction of about
1401.5tons of COD, it will play important role in improving the surface water quality
especially for the water environmental quality at Huangpu River, Yangtze River Mouth
and East China Sea. By utilizing the bio-gas, it will also produce electricity of 4,788,000
kWh and reduce the discharge of CO2 by 23,575 tons per year, which contributes to the
alleviation of global warming. It will also decrease the incidence of water-borne and
zoonotic disease, not only within the livestock raising communities but also for other
water users living downstream of the livestock raising areas.
3. Describe any project alternatives (if relevant) considered to help avoid or minimize
adverse impacts.
During project preparation, alternative locations and alternative technical processes and
designs have been identified, evaluated and compared with the objective to avoid or
otherwise minimize potential adverse environmental and social impacts and to maximize
project benefits. The EA teams worked closely with the project planners/ owners and
feasibility study teams to compare and evaluate alternatives, and optimal alternatives
were selected based on the avoidance of or least adverse social and environmental
impacts as well as other economic, technical, and financial considerations for the least
cost solutions. A "without project" scenario was also considered as an alternative. Below
is a summary of the major alternatives have been considered. Alternative analysis for the
livestock waste management technology demonstration include: with and without project,
alternative locations, and alternative treatment processes. Alternative analysis for the
wetland sewage treatment system include: with and without project, alternative locations,
and alternative treatment processes. Details are in the CEA report. The Social Consultant
also worked closely with the PIAs and design institute to locate the wetland facilities on
the waste land rather than the farmland to minimize their adverse impact on villagers.
4. Describe measures taken by the borrower to address safeguard policy issues. Provide
an assessment of borrower capacity to plan and implement the measures described.
The Shanghai Project Management Office (PMO) had sound experience in working for
the Bank-financed projects. The resettlement performance for the Phase 1 and 2 of the
APL program are satisfactory at present. The Shanghai Academy of Social Science was
contracted to help the preparation of the ARAP and will also provide technical assistance
to the Shanghai PMO during resettlement implementation.
The Shanghai PMO and PIAs will take the responsibility for environmental
management and compliance with required environmental standards during construction
and operation phases. The Shanghai PMO demonstrated rich experiences and capacity to
plan and implement the mitigation measures during the APL1 and APL2 implementation.
In order to maximize environmental benefits and to avoid or mitigate potential short-
term adverse environmental impacts, an EMP was prepared for each subcomponent. The
EMP includes detailed information on environmental management, supervision
mechanism and institutional arrangements, mitigation measures, environmental
monitoring plans, training plans, and ways to strengthen client capacity. In addition, for
the Integrated Agricultural Pollution Reduction Techniques Component, a PMP was
prepared.
5. Identify the key stakeholders and describe the mechanisms for consultation and
disclosure on safeguard policies, with an emphasis on potentially affected people.
Apart from the consultation conducted to obtain inputs into project design, public
consultations were conducted for residents and those affected by the proposed project,
including persons from different groups e.g. gender, socioeconomic and educational
backgrounds, and occupations. The consultations took different forms: expert
consultations, questionnaires, and internet online survey. The majority of those consulted
expressed strong support for the project and acceptance of short-term inconveniencies.
The main public concerns included noise and flying dust during construction, and
wastewater and odor during the operation phase. Public concerns and opinions expressed
are addressed in the EA report and incorporated into the project design and
environmental mitigation measures.
Information about the project was disclosed through Shanghai Environmental Hotline
Website in October 2008. Telephone hotlines were established for the public to access
relevant documents and offer comments. Disclosure of EA and ARAP report was
announced in a local newspaper, Wen Hui, on April 30, 2009, and EA/ARAP reports
were made available at the Shanghai PMO, local participating entities, and on relevant
websites. The draft English versions EA/EMP, PMP, and ARAP reports were submitted
to the Bank and disclosed through the Infoshop on May 6 2009.
B. Disclosure Requirements Date
Environmental Assessment/Audit/Management Plan/Other:
Was the document disclosed prior to appraisal? Yes
Date of receipt by the Bank
04/15/2009
Date of "in-country" disclosure
04/30/2009
Date of submission to InfoShop
05/06/2009
For category A projects, date of distributing the Executive
Summary of the EA to the Executive Directors
Resettlement Action Plan/Framework/Policy Process:
Was the document disclosed prior to appraisal? Yes
Date of receipt by the Bank
04/15/2009
Date of "in-country" disclosure
04/30/2009
Date of submission to InfoShop
05/06/2009
Indigenous Peoples Plan/Planning Framework:
Was the document disclosed prior to appraisal?
Date of receipt by the Bank
Date of "in-country" disclosure
Date of submission to InfoShop
Pest Management Plan:
Was the document disclosed prior to appraisal? Yes
Date of receipt by the Bank
04/15/2009
Date of "in-country" disclosure
04/30/2009
Date of submission to InfoShop
05/06/2009
* If the project triggers the Pest Management and/or Physical Cultural Resources,
the respective issues are to be addressed and disclosed as part of the Environmental
Assessment/Audit/or EMP.
If in-country disclosure of any of the above documents is not expected, please
explain why:
C. Compliance Monitoring Indicators at the Corporate Level (to be filled in when the
ISDS is finalized by the project decision meeting)
OP/BP/GP 4.01 - Environment Assessment
Does the project require a stand-alone EA (including EMP) report?
Yes
If yes, then did the Regional Environment Unit or Sector Manager (SM)
Yes
review and approve the EA report?
Are the cost and the accountabilities for the EMP incorporated in the
Yes
credit/loan?
OP 4.09 - Pest Management
Does the EA adequately address the pest management issues?
Yes
Is a separate PMP required?
Yes
If yes, has the PMP been reviewed and approved by a safeguards specialist or Yes
SM? Are PMP requirements included in project design? If yes, does the
project team include a Pest Management Specialist?
OP/BP 4.12 - Involuntary Resettlement
Has a resettlement plan/abbreviated plan/policy framework/process
Yes
framework (as appropriate) been prepared?
If yes, then did the Regional unit responsible for safeguards or Sector
Yes
Manager review the plan?
The World Bank Policy on Disclosure of Information
Have relevant safeguard policies documents been sent to the World Bank's
Yes
Infoshop?
Have relevant documents been disclosed in-country in a public place in a
Yes
form and language that are understandable and accessible to project-affected
groups and local NGOs?
All Safeguard Policies
Have satisfactory calendar, budget and clear institutional responsibilities
Yes
been prepared for the implementation of measures related to safeguard
policies?
Have costs related to safeguard policy measures been included in the project
Yes
cost?
Does the Monitoring and Evaluation system of the project include the
Yes
monitoring of safeguard impacts and measures related to safeguard policies?
Have satisfactory implementation arrangements been agreed with the
Yes
borrower and the same been adequately reflected in the project legal
documents?
D. Approvals
Signed and submitted by:
Name
Date
Task Team Leader:
Mr Takuya Kamata
02/18/2010
Environmental Specialist:
Mr Yiren Feng
02/08/2010
Social Development Specialist
Mr Jun Zeng
02/09/2010
Additional Environmental and/or
Social Development Specialist(s):
Approved by:
Sector Manager:
Mr Ede Jorge Ijjasz-Vasquez
02/23/2010
Comments: