LIST OF ANNEXES
1. TOR for the DLIST-Benguela Terminal Evaluation
2. List of documents reviewed
3. DLIST Final Evaluation Schedule
4. List of Persons and Organizations interviewed
5. Logical Framework Analysis
6. Financial Planning Co- financing
7. List of Acronyms Relevant to the Terminal Evaluation
8. List of number of total document downloaded by DLIST users not affiliated with
Distance Learning Courses.
9. Example of DLIST Discussion Forum thread citing the need for translation of
content.
10. Example of an Outreach tool to engage youth within coastal communities
11. Comments by stakeholders (only in case of discrepancies with evaluation
findings and conclusions)
Annex 1
Terms of Reference - Final Evaluation (FE)
UNDP/GEF Distance Learning and Information Sharing Tool
(DLIST-Benguela)
1. INTRODUCTION:
The Monitoring and Evaluation Policy (M&E Policy) at the project level in UNDP/GEF
has four objectives to:
a) Monitor and evaluate results and impacts;
b) Provide a basis for decision making on necessary amendments and improvements;
c) Promote accountability for resource use;
d) Document, provide feedback on, and disseminate lessons learned.
A mix of tools is used to ensure effective Project monitoring and evaluation. These might
be applied continuously throughout the lifetime of the project e.g. periodic monitoring of
indicators through the annual Programme Implementation Reports (PIR), Project
Steering Committee meetings or as specific and time-bound exercises such as mid-
term reviews (MTR), audit reports and final evaluations (FE). In accordance with
UNDP/GEF Monitoring and Evaluation policies and procedures, all regular and medium-
sized projects supported by the GEF should undergo a final evaluation upon or nearing
completion of implementation. A final evaluation of a GEF-funded project (or previous
phase) is also required before a concept proposal for additional funding (or subsequent
phases of the same project) can be considered for inclusion in a GEF work program.
However, a final evaluation is not an appraisal of the follow-up phase.
Final evaluations are intended to assess the relevance, performance and success of the
projects. It looks at early signs of potential impact and sustainability of results, including
the contribution to capacity development and the achievement of global environmental
goals and objectives. It will also identify and document lessons learned and make
recommendations that might improve the design and implementation of other
UNDP/GEF projects.
2. BACKGROUND:
The DLIST-Benguela Project is designed to offer an electronic platform for vital
information sharing and distance learning. The project assures dissemination of the
scientific outputs of the existing Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem and
BENEFIT programmes in Angola, Namibia and South Africa, to all civil stakeholders
along the coastline of the Benguela Current. Such mass education and awareness
building through information sharing amongst the stakeholder communities will enable
effective participation of local communities, as follows. Regional and local decision
makers will become involved in translation of the scientific findings of programmes in the
BCLME area, into management action, ensuring sustainable management of the
Current.
Local communities will be empowered to develop alternative livelihoods,
therewith empowering local communities and substantially contribute to realization of
Community Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) objectives along the
Benguela coastline. The sharing of information and lessons learned, will further
strengthen linkages between existing marine and coastal programmes in the BCLME
area, therewith enhancing the effectiveness of the individual efforts.
The Programme is funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) which has
contributed $775,000 through the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) for
the regional initiative. The GEF's funding complements an investment of $158,000 by
the Academic institutions in the three countries, and over $600,000 from other sources
such as the USAID, Eco/Africa and private organizations. The Government of Angola,
Namibia, and South Africa, the United Nations Development Programme and UNOPS
signed the project document in 2005.
The Project Goal:
To ensure that collaborative management arrangements for stress reduction are in place
to protect the ecological integrity of the transboundary BCLME and sustain living marine
resources vital to the sustainable development of coastal communities.
The Project Objective:
To bridge the information gap by using innovative ICT applications to provide access to
training and to increase flow of information between experts, institutions and networks
and coastal players including communities, as well as between themselves so a
common pool of knowledge is created and maintained.
The Project has four Outcomes:
1. Outcome 1: IT Platform: to put in place an innovative and user friendly IT
platform for coastal stakeholders
2. Outcome 2: Course Development: to offer coastal players a distance learning
course on sustainable development in coastal areas
3. Outcome 3: Knowledge Management: to promote free access and flow of
information between coastal players
4. Outcome 4: Outreach: to make the ICT platform accessible to coastal
communities
3. GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF THE EVALUTION:
The final evaluation of the UNDP/GEF project "DLIST-BENGUELA" is initiated by the
UNDP Namibia and it is being undertaken in accordance with the UNDP/GEF Project
Monitoring
and
Evaluation
Policy
see
(http://thegef.org/MonitoringandEvaluation/MEPoliciesProcedures/mepoliciesprocedures.ht
ml). The principal purpose of the Final Evaluation is to assess the project results and
impacts as required by the UNDP/GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy. It is also
mandatory to evaluate and review any UNDP programme of the magnitude of USD 1
million or more, at mid-term and when the assistance is about to phase out. The mid-term
review exercise of DLIST-Benguela Project was conducted in 20071. The FE is expected
to deliver an objective evaluation report that documents project results and capture the
performance against the set and agreed objectives, to document and capture lessons
learned that will provide lessons and best practices with a view of informing similar project
initiatives.
The main stakeholders of the DLIST-Benguela Project are:
1. Governments of Angola, Namibia and South Africa;
2. Coastal communities and players from the three participating countries (DLIST
users), including individuals and organizations;
3. BCLME FSP;
4. Institutions of higher learning especially, the Polytechnic of Namibia (PON) and
University of Namibia (UNAM), Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT),
Agustino Netto; and,
5. UNDP COs in the participating countries, UNOPS, UNDP/GEF
4. PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE:
4.1
OBJECTIVES OF THE FINAL EVALUATION:
A final evaluation is a mandatory requirement of UNDP/GEF Programmes and Projects
of this magnitude. The evaluation will analyze and assess the achievements and
progress made so far towards achieving the original objectives of the DLIST-Benguela
Project. It will also identify factors that have facilitated or impeded the achievement of
the objectives. The evaluation will consider the effectiveness, efficiency, relevance,
impact and sustainability of the DLIST-Benguela Project. While a thorough assessment
of the implementation to date is important, the evaluation is expected to also result in
recommendations and lessons learned to assist in defining future direction of similar
projects.
The evaluation will in particular assess:
(1) Project Design review the original project intervention strategy including objectives,
outcomes, outputs and activities and assess quality of the design and delivery of
planned outcomes. The review should also assess the conceptualization, design,
effectiveness, relevance and implementability of the project. The review should also
include the updated logical framework matrix if applicable and any relevant review
1 Conducting an external review of a regional project, irrespective of the project size, requires significant
financial resources, which would be a significant financial burden for a medium size project (a project up to
USD1 million funding from GEF). Therefore, it is agreed and commonly practiced that International
Waters medium size projects would undergo an internal mid-term review processes. Such internal review
processes are generally conducted by the Project Steering Committee (PSC) and it provides the Project
Management Unit with guidance on further implementation of the project to ensure the intended project
outputs and outcomes are achieved in the most effective and efficient manner and maximize its long lasting
impacts. DLIST-Benguela underwent the internal review process at its PSC held in June 2007.
undertaken during the Project Inception Phase and Meeting. This evaluation shall
cross-reference the results, and report, including recommendations of the PIRs
completed in 2005, 2006, and 2007 as well as the minutes of the mid-term review
exercise which was conducted in 2007.
(2) Project Impact assess the achievements of the DLIST-Benguela Project to date
against the original objectives, outcomes and activities using the indicators as
defined in the project document as well as any valid amendments made thereafter.
Of particular relevance are the indicators that have been identified, reviewed and
updated during mid-term review exercise. Achievements should be measured
against the indicators as described in the log frame.
(3) Project Implementation assess:
a. Project management arrangements, i.e., effectiveness of UNDP/GEF, UNDP
Country Office, UNOPS, the Project Implementation Team (DLIST-Benguela
Team), and the DLIST-nodes established in each of the countries;
b. Quality and timeliness of delivering outputs and activities;
c. Financial situation (i.e., budget and expenditure status). In this regard, this
evaluation is not a financial audit, which is a separate process carried out by
UNOPS. If a financial audit was done the evaluators should have access to
the audit reports under the auspices of UNOPS;
d. Cooperation among partners including but not limited to: GEF, UNDP,
Governments counterpart Ministries, DLIST-team, and private companies;
e. Responsiveness of project management to adapt and implement changes in
project execution, based on partner and stakeholder's feedback;
Based on the above points, the evaluation should provide a document of no more than
30 pages indicating what project activities, outcomes, outputs and impacts/results have
been achieved to date, and specifically:
(1)
Assess the extent of the progress which the DLIST-Benguela Project has
made to achieve its objectives and where gaps are evident;
(2)
Draw lessons from the experiences of the DLIST-Benguela Project, in
particular those elements that have worked well and those that have not,
requiring adjustments and;
(3)
Provide recommendations to strengthen the effectiveness, efficiency,
impact, implementation, execution and sustainability of the DLIST-
Benguela Project.
4.2
SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION:
While the specific issues of concern are listed in the following paragraphs, a reference to
the UNDP User Guide and UNDP/GEF guidelines to conduct terminal or end-of-cycle
evaluations should be made for addressing the issues not covered below.
The evaluation will include ratings on the following two aspects: (1) Sustainability and (2)
Outcome/Achievement of objectives (the extent to which the programme's immediate and
development objectives were achieved). The evaluation team should provide ratings for
three of the criteria included in the Final Evaluations: (3) Implementation Approach; (4)
Stakeholder Participation/Public Involvement; and (5) Monitoring and Evaluation.
The
ratings will be: Highly Satisfactory, Satisfactory, Marginally Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory,
Highly Unsatisfactory and N/A.
4.2a)
Programme Conceptualization/Design:
1. Whether the problem the project addressed is clearly identified and the approach
soundly conceived.
2. Whether the target beneficiaries and end-users of the results of the programme are
clearly identified.
3. Whether the objectives and outputs of the project were stated explicitly and precisely in
verifiable terms with observable success indicators.
4. Whether the relationship between objectives, outputs, activities and inputs of the project
are logically articulated.
5. Whether the project started with a well-prepared work-plan and reasons, if any, for
deviations.
4.2b)
Project Relevance:
1. Whether the programme is relevant to the development priorities of the participating
countries.
2. Given the objectives of the programme, whether appropriate institutions have been
assisted.
4.2c)
Programme Implementation:
The evaluation team will examine the quality and timeliness in regard to:
1. The delivery of inputs specified in the programme document, including selection of sub-
programmes/projects,
institutional
arrangements,
interest
of
beneficiaries,
the
scheduling and actual implementation.
2. The fulfilling of the success criteria as outlined in the programme document.
3. The responsiveness of the project management to significant changes in the
environment in which the programme functions (both facilitating and impeding project
implementation).
4. Lessons
from
other
relevant
programmes
if
incorporated
in
the
programme
implementation.
5. The monitoring and backstopping of the project as expected by the Government and
UNDP.
6. The delivery of Government counterpart inputs in terms of personnel, premises and
indigenous equipment, if applicable.
7. Project's collaboration with industry associations, private sector, universities and civil
society, if relevant.
4.2d)
Programme Performance:
1. Whether the management arrangements of the project were appropriate.
2. Whether the project resources (financial, physical and manpower) were adequate in
terms of both quantity and quality as well as completing the Financial Planning
Cofinancing Table (attached on page 16).
3. Whether the project resources are used effectively to produce planned results.
4. Whether the project is cost-effective compared to similar interventions.
5. Whether the technologies selected (any innovations adopted, if any) were suitable.
6. The role of UNDP CO and its impact (positive and negative) on the functioning of the
project.
4.2e)
Results/Success of the programme applied to each Specific Programme/Project (3
Areas):
The overall outputs and their meaning are as defined in the programme support documents
or project documents that should form the main basis for this evaluation. The details of the
specific project impact to be provided, in addition to general outputs, are as under:
1. What are the major achievements of the project vis-à-vis its objectives.
2. What are the potential areas for project's success? Please explain in detail in terms
of impact, sustainability of results and contribution to capacity development.
3. What major issues and problems affected the implementation of the project and
what factors could have resolved them.
4. Given an opportunity, what actions the evaluation team members would have
recommended to ensure that this potential for success translated into actual
success.
5. Level of institutional networking achieved and capacity development of key partners,
if done in a structured manner at different stages from inception to sub-
programme operations.
6. Environmental impact (positive and negative) and remedial action taken at each
sub-programme site.
7. Social impacts, including impact on the lives of women at each sub-programme site.
8. Any underlying factors, beyond control, that influenced the outcome of each sub-
programme.
Some of the categories in the findings and conclusions need to be rated in conformity
with the GEF guidelines for final evaluations.
4.3
METHODOLOGY/EVALUATION APPROACH:
The evaluation team should provide details in respect of:
1. Documentation review (desk study);
2. Interviews and/or consultations;
3. Presentations and/or meetings;
4. Field visits if any;
5. Questionnaires, if used; and
6. Participation of stakeholders and/or partners.
5. TIME TABLE:
The duration of the evaluation will be a total of 20 working days and will commence towards
early August 2008 with the following tentative schedule for the critical milestones:
·
Acceptance and commencement of duties by end August 2008.
·
Inception meeting with the principal parties (UNDP and DLIST-Benguela Team)
by first week of September, with a schedule and definite timetable for the overall
evaluation.
·
Draft Evaluation Report by end October 2008.
·
Presentation of the draft to the key stakeholders and incorporation of comments
if deemed necessary, including submission of six copies of the Second Draft
evaluation report by mid November 2008.
·
Final Evaluation report by first week of December 2008, electronic format, and in
six copies, 6 CD ROMs.
6. CONSULTATIONS:
The consultant and team members are open to consult all reports, files, manuals,
guidelines and resource people they feel essential, to make the most effective findings,
conclusions and recommendations. The mission will maintain close liaison with the UNDP
Resident Representative and Deputy Resident Representative in Namibia, as well as other
concerned officials and agencies in UNDP, and the national focal point staff assigned to the
project, the DLIST-Benguela Team including Project Manager, and managers of the nodes
in the three countries.
7. REPORTING:
The evaluation team will report directly to the Senior Management of UNDP Namibia,
UNDP/GEF RCU, but mostly to the UNDP Resident Representative and/or his designated
officials to act on his behalves. The consultants shall work in close collaboration with the
DLIST-Benguela Team. The consultants will prepare and submit the draft report of the
evaluation to UNDP.
A presentation and debriefing of the report to UNDP, the project
beneficiaries (executing and implementing agencies), PSC will be made in July 2008 as
part of the wrap-up workshop for the DLIST-Benguela project. The reporting schedule will
be finalized during the inception meeting between the evaluation team and key
stakeholders (UNDP, UNDP/GEF, and DLIST-Benguela Team).
DISCLOSURE
Although the evaluation team is free to discuss with the authorities and any partners in the
three countries on anything relevant to the assignment, under the terms of reference, the
team is not authorized to make any commitments on behalf of UNDP or the Governments
of Angola, Namibia and South Africa.
Terminology in the GEF Guidelines to Terminal Evaluations
Explanation on Terminology Provided in the GEF Guidelines to Terminal Evaluations
Implementation Approach includes an analysis of the project's logical framework, adaptation to
changing conditions (adaptive management), partnerships in implementation arrangements,
changes in project design, and overall project management.
Some elements of an effective implementation approach may include:
The logical framework used during implementation as a management and M&E tool
Effective partnerships arrangements established for implementation of the project with
relevant stakeholders involved in the country/region
Lessons from other relevant projects (e.g., same focal area) incorporated into project
implementation
Feedback from M&E activities used for adaptive management.
Country Ownership/Driveness is the relevance of the project to national development and
environmental agendas, recipient country commitment, and regional and international agreements
where applicable. Project Concept has its origin within the national sectoral and development
plans
Some elements of effective country ownership/driveness may include:
Project Concept has its origin within the national sectoral and development plans
Outcomes (or potential outcomes) from the project have been incorporated into the national
sectoral and development plans
Relevant country representatives (e.g., governmental official, civil society, etc.) are actively
involved in project identification, planning and/or implementation
The recipient government has maintained financial commitment to the project
The government has approved policies and/or modified regulatory frameworks in line with
the project's objectives
For projects whose main focus and actors are in the private-sector rather than public-sector (e.g.,
IFC projects), elements of effective country ownership/driveness that demonstrate the interest and
commitment of the local private sector to the project may include:
The number of companies that participated in the project by: receiving technical assistance,
applying for financing, attending dissemination events, adopting environmental standards
promoted by the project, etc.
Amount contributed by participating companies to achieve the environmental benefits
promoted by the project, including: equity invested, guarantees provided, co-funding of
project activities, in-kind contributions, etc.
Project's collaboration with industry associations
Stakeholder Participation/Public Involvement consist of three related, and often overlapping
processes: information dissemination, consultation, and "stakeholder" participation. Stakeholders
are the individuals, groups, institutions, or other bodies that have an interest or stake in the
outcome of the GEF-financed project. The term also applies to those potentially adversely
affected by a project.
Examples of effective public involvement include:
Information dissemination
Implementation of appropriate outreach/public awareness campaigns
Consultation and stakeholder participation
Consulting and making use of the skills, experiences and knowledge of NGOs, community
and local groups, the private and public sectors, and academic institutions in the design,
implementation, and evaluation of project activities
Stakeholder participation
Project institutional networks well placed within the overall national or community
organizational structures, for example, by building on the local decision making structures,
incorporating local knowledge, and devolving project management responsibilities to the
local organizations or communities as the project approaches closure
Building partnerships among different project stakeholders
Fulfillment of commitments to local stakeholders and stakeholders considered to be
adequately involved.
Sustainability measures the extent to which benefits continue, within or outside the project
domain, from a particular project or program after GEF assistance/external assistance has come to
an end. Relevant factors to improve the sustainability of project outcomes include:
Development and implementation of a sustainability strategy.
Establishment of the financial and economic instruments and mechanisms to ensure the
ongoing flow of benefits once the GEF assistance ends (from the public and private sectors,
income generating activities, and market transformations to promote the project's objectives).
Development of suitable organizational arrangements by public and/or private sector.
Development of policy and regulatory frameworks that further the project objectives.
Incorporation of environmental and ecological factors affecting future flow of benefits.
Development of appropriate institutional capacity (systems, structures, staff, expertise, etc.) .
Identification and involvement of champions (i.e. individuals in government and civil society
who can promote sustainability of project outcomes).
Achieving social sustainability, for example, by mainstreaming project activities into the
economy or community production activities.
Achieving stakeholders consensus regarding courses of action on project activities.
Replication approach, in the context of GEF projects, is defined as lessons and experiences
coming out of the project that are replicated or scaled up in the design and implementation of
other projects. Replication can have two aspects, replication proper (lessons and experiences are
replicated in different geographic area) or scaling up (lessons and experiences are replicated
within the same geographic area but funded by other sources). Examples of replication
approaches include:
Knowledge transfer (i.e., dissemination of lessons through project result documents, training
workshops, information exchange, a national and regional forum, etc).
Expansion of demonstration projects.
Capacity building and training of individuals, and institutions to expand the project's
achievements in the country or other regions.
Use of project-trained individuals, institutions or companies to replicate the project's
outcomes in other regions.
Financial Planning includes actual project cost by activity, financial management (including
disbursement issues), and co-financing. If a financial audit has been conducted the major findings
should be presented in the TE.
Effective financial plans include:
Identification of potential sources of co-financing as well as leveraged and associated
financing2.
Strong financial controls, including reporting, and planning that allow the project
management to make informed decisions regarding the budget at any time, allows for a
proper and timely flow of funds, and for the payment of satisfactory project deliverables
Due diligence due diligence in the management of funds and financial audits.
Co financing includes: Grants, Loans/Concessional (compared to market rate), Credits, Equity
investments, In-kind support, Other contributions mobilized for the project from other
multilateral agencies, bilateral development cooperation agencies, NGOs, the private sector and
beneficiaries. Please refer to Council documents on co-financing for definitions, such as
GEF/C.20/6.
Leveraged resources are additional resources--beyond those committed to the project itself at the
time of approval--that are mobilized later as a direct result of the project. Leveraged resources
can be financial or in-kind and they may be from other donors, NGO's, foundations,
governments, communities or the private sector. Please briefly describe the resources the project
has leveraged since inception and indicate how these resources are contributing to the project's
ultimate objective.
Cost-effectiveness assesses the achievement of the environmental and developmental objectives
as well as the project's outputs in relation to the inputs, costs, and implementing time. It also
examines the project's compliance with the application of the incremental cost concept. Cost-
effective factors include:
Compliance with the incremental cost criteria (e.g. GEF funds are used to finance a
component of a project that would not have taken place without GEF funding.) and securing
co-funding and associated funding.
The project completed the planned activities and met or exceeded the expected outcomes in
terms of achievement of Global Environmental and Development Objectives according to
schedule, and as cost-effective as initially planned.
The project used either a benchmark approach or a comparison approach (did not exceed the
costs levels of similar projects in similar contexts)
Monitoring & Evaluation.
Monitoring is the periodic oversight of a process, or the
implementation of an activity, which seeks to establish the extent to which inputs, work
schedules, other required actions and outputs are proceeding according to plan, so that timely
action can be taken to correct the deficiencies detected. Evaluation is a process by which program
inputs, activities and results are analyzed and judged explicitly against benchmarks or baseline
conditions using performance indicators. This will allow project managers and planners to make
2 Please refer to Council documents on co-financing for definitions, such as GEF/C.20/6. The following page presents a
table to be used for reporting co-financing.
decisions based on the evidence of information on the project implementation stage, performance
indicators, level of funding still available, etc, building on the project's logical framework.
Monitoring and Evaluation includes activities to measure the project's achievements such as
identification of performance indicators, measurement procedures, and determination of baseline
conditions. Projects are required to implement plans for monitoring and evaluation with adequate
funding and appropriate staff and include activities such as description of data sources and
methods for data collection, collection of baseline data, and stakeholder participation. Given the
long-term nature of many GEF projects, projects are also encouraged to include long-term
monitoring plans that are sustainable after project completion.
Annex 2.
List of Documents Reviewed
Document
1. DLIST-Benguela Project Document
2. Database of all Project Stakeholders
3. Progress and Financial Reports (Q1-Q9)
4. DLIST Logical Framework
5. Project Steering Committee Meeting Minutes (1st and 2nd meeting minutes)
6. Project Operational Team Meetings Minutes
7. DLIST Report: Course Development Workshop (Namibia)
8. Earthnotes (film festival) Evaluation Report
9. Radio Programme Action Plan
10. First Radio Programme Content
11. Newsletters (1-4)
12. Report of the Coastal Environment Week
13. Co-funding Table
14. DLIST Workshop Minutes SA
15. DLIST Workshop Namibia
16. 2006 Course Evaluation Results
17. Detailed feedback on Angola visit
18. Detailed Report on Actions on Angolan Course Development
19. Experience Note: IW Learn Workshop
20. Extract from the findings of MSc. Research of Rean van der Merve
21. Courses in Progress
22. Ongoing Activities
23. Assorted Analyses, Notes, Write-ups
24. Miscellaneous
25. Archive Documents of Relevance
26. Papers for Publication
27. http://www.dlist.org
28. DLIST Discussion Threads from X, 200y until Z, 2008.
29. DLIST Final Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
30. IKM Co-financing table for DLIST activities
31 Progress and Financial Reports (Q10-Q12)
Annex 3. DLIST Terminal Evaluation Schedule August-September 2008
Date
Area
Travel and
Discussion Topic
Stakeholders
Contact
Accommodation Details
26/08/2008
Arrival in
Transport and accommodation
Samuel Chademana
samuel.chademana@undp.org
Tuesday
Johannesburg
arrangements organised by
Tel +27 12 354 8112
Samuel Chademana
Mobile +27 79 499 7767
27/08/2008
Pretoria
Meeting with Akiko Yamamoto
Akiko Yamamoto
akiko.yamamoto@undp.org
Wednesday
in the morning and afternoon
Depart for Windhoek (17H25-
18H25)
Collect Rental Car at the
Windhoek International Airport
(reference number 136716184)
Accommodation at the Safari
Hotel (reservation number
12192)
28/08/2008
Windhoek
Meet with Martha
Martha Mwandingi
martha.mwadingi@undp.org
Thursday
Swakopmund
UNDP
Meet with Motlana
Lebogang Motlana
lebogang.motlana@undp.org
UNDP
Meet with Ignatius
UNAM Course
Ignatius Kauvee
ikauvee@unam.na
UNAM
Meet with Martin
CPUT Course,
Martin Shikongo
shk@windhoekcc.org.na
Information Sharing
City of Windhoek
Travel to Swakopmund in the
afternoon
Accommodation booked at Alte
Brucke Resort
29/08/2008
Swakopmund
Meet with Timo
Outreach,
Timo Mufeti
tmufeti@nacoma.org.na
Friday
Walvis Bay
information sharing
NACOMA
Meet with Rod
Outreach,
Rod Braby
rbraby@nacoma.org.na
information sharing
NACOMA
Meet with David
Outreach,
David Uushona
duushona@walvisbaycc.org.na
information sharing
Municipality of
Walvis Bay
30/08/2008
Swakopmund
Meet with Asser
Outreach,
Asser Katunahange
akatunahange@mfmr.gov.na
Saturday
Walvis Bay
information sharing
Ministry of Fisheries
or yasserq29@yahoo.com
and Marine
Resources
31/08/2008
Luderitz
Depart for Luderitz in the
Sunday
afternoon (1250- 1420)
Overnight in
Collect Rental car at the
Luderitz (Nadine to
Luderitz Airport
book at Nest Hotel)
Meet with Nadine
Outreach,
Nadine Pickering
nadine@ecoafrica.co.za
information sharing
DLIST node
moderator
Meet with Orange
Outreach,
Jacob Orange
orange@iway.na
information sharing
DLIST user
Meet with Estelle
Outreach,
Estelle Fiedl
estellef@novanam.com
information sharing
DLIST user
01/09/2008
Kuboes
Drive to Kuboes and meet with
Outreach,
Gert Links
gertlinks@richtersveld-
Monday
Port Nolloth
Gert Links
information sharing
Richtersveld
conservancy.org
Community
Conservancy
Drive to Alexander Bay to visit
the Orange River mouth
(Nadine to arrange with Abuys
to meet them in Alexander Bay)
Drive to Port Nolloth and meet
Outreach,
Johan Lanzer
jlannzer@mweb.co.za
with Johan
information sharing
Outreach,
Abuys de Wet
abraham@richtersveld.gov.za
Overnight in Port Nolloth
information sharing
Accommodation booked at Port
Indigo Guest House
02/09/2008
Eksteenfontein
Drive to Eksteenfontein and
Outreach,
Henley Strauss
henleys@lantic.net
Tuesday
Springbok
meet Joani, Henley and Floors
information sharing
DLIST user
Kamieskroon
Outreach,
Joani Cloete
joani@richtersveld.net
Bitterfontein
information sharing
Richtersveld
Community
Conservancy
Outreach,
Floor Straus
floors@ecoafrica.co.za
information sharing
DLIST user
Drive to Springbok and meet
Information sharing
Wilna Opel
Mobile +27 83 5122785
with Wilna Oppel
DLIST user
woppel@live.co.za
Drive to Kamieskroon and meet
Information sharing
Priscilla Magerman
Namaqua National Park
with Priscilla
DLIST user
Tel +27 27 672 1948
priscillam@sanparks.org
Drive to Bitterfontein and meet
Information sharing
Malinda Gardener
Tel +27 738798761
with Malinda
DLIST user
m.gardiner@conservation.org
Overnight in Bitterfontein
03/09/2008
Cape Town
Drive to Cape Town
Project activities
DLIST Team
Wednesday
Accommodation booked at
Koornhoop Guest House
04/09/2008
Cape Town
Meet with the DLIST Team
Project activities
DLIST Team
Thursday
Meet with Ilyas Omar
CPUT course, ERC
Ilyas Omar
Omari@cput.ac.za
CPUT
Meet with Eugene Cairncross
CPUT course, ERC
Eugene Cairncross
cairncrosse@cput.ac.za
CPUT
05/09/2008
Cape Town
Meet with Phoebe Barnard in
Film Festival
Phoebe Barnard
barnard@sanbi.org
Friday
Johannesburg
the morning
Cancelled
SANBI
Fly to Johannesburg in the
afternoon
Overnight at Collonial
Guesthouse
06/09/2008
Meet with Francois Odendaal
francois@ecoafrica.co.za
Saturday
(CTA); Depart for the USA at 6h55
pm
Annex 4. List of Persons Interviewed
Person's Name Affiliation
Contact
Date(s) and
Email or Phone
Method
duration of
(e.g. in-
contact
person/phone)
Akiko Yamamoto
UNDP
Email,
Email, telephone (), and
Akiko.yamamoto@undp.org
telephone, in-
SKYPE (). Wednesday,
person,
August 27, 2008, 9:30-
Pretoria, South
12:45
Africa
Martha
UNDP-Namibia
In-person,
Thursday, August, 28,
Martha.mwandingi@undp.org
Mwandingi
Windhoek,
2008, 9:50-11:30
Namibia
Lebogang
UNDP-Namibia
In-person,
Thursday, August, 28,
Lebogang.motlana@undp.org
Motlana
Windhoek,
2008, 9:50-11:30
Namibia
Martin Shikongo
City of Windhoek
In-person,
Thursday, August, 28,
shk@windhoek.cc.org.na
Windhoek,
2008, 13:20-14:10
Namibia
Ignatius Kauvee
UNAM
In-person,
Thursday, August, 28,
ikauvee@unam.na
Windhoek,
2008, 14:15-14:40
Namibia
David Uushona
Municipality of
In-person,
Friday, August 29,
Duushona@walvisbaycc.org.na
Walvis Bay
Walvis Bay,
2008, 11:30-12:35
Namibia
Olavi Makuti
Municipality of
In-person
Friday, August 29,
omakuti@walvisbaycc.org.na
Walvis Bay
Walvis Bay,
2008, 11:30-12:35
Namibia
Rod Braby
NACOMA Project
In-person
Friday, August 29,
rbraby@nacoma.org.na
Swakopmund,
2008, 14:05-15:25
Namibia
Asser
Ministry of
In-person,
Saturday, August 30,
akatunahange@mfmr.gov.na
Katunahange
Fisheries and
Swakopmund,
2008, 11:50-13:00
Marine Resources
Namibia
Nadine Pickering
DLIST PMU, and
In-person,
Sunday, August 31,
Nadine@ecoafrica.co.za
EcoAfrica-Namibia
Luderitz,
2008, 10:00 -~11:00;
Namibia
Wednesday, September
3, 14:05~16:30
Jacob Orange
DLIST Stakeholder
In-person,
Sunday, August 31,
orange@iway.na
and User
Luderitz,
2008, 10:00 -~11:00
Namibia
Gert Links
Richtersveld
In-person,
Monday, September 1,
gertlinks@richterveld-
Community
Kuboes,
2008, 16:45-17:15
conservancy.org
Conservancy
Namibia
Lorenza Jossop
Richtersveld
In-person,
Monday, September 1,
Community
Kuboes,
2008, 16:45-17:15
Conservancy
Namibia
Carmen Cloete
DLIST user and
In-person,
Monday, September 1,
Distant learner
Orange River
2008, 18:15~18:45
mouth, Port
Nolloth
Johan Lanzer
DLIST Stakeholder
In-person, Port
Tuesday, September 2,
jlannzer@mweb.co.za
and User
Nolloth
2008, 9:20-10:25
Museum and
Biodiversity
Centre
Abuys de Wet
DLIST Stakeholder
In-person, Port
Tuesday, September 2,
Abraham@richtersveld.gov.za
and User
Nolloth
2008, 10:30-11:00
Leander Phillips
DLIST Stakeholder
In-person, Port
Tuesday, September 2,
and IT specialist
Nolloth
2008, 10:30-11:00
Floor Straus
DLIST Stakeholder
In-person,
Tuesday, September 2,
floors@ecoafrica.co.za
and User
Eksteenfontein
2008, 13:00-13:55
Wilna Opel
DLIST Stakeholder
In-person,
Tuesday, September 2,
woppel@live.co.za
and User
Springbok,
2008, 16:00-17:00
South Africa
Joani Cloete
Richtersveld
In-person,
Tuesday, September 2,
joani@richtersveld.net
Community
Sprinkbok,
2008, 17:00-17:50
Conservancy
South Africa
Priscilla
DLIST Stakeholder
In-person,
Tuesday, September 3,
priscillam@sanparks.org
Magerman
and User
Kamieskroon,
2008, 8:40-9:20
South Africa
Ilyas Omar
CPUT, Professor,
In-person, @
Wednesday, September Omari@cput.ac.za
in charge of
CPUT Library
4, 2008, 10:25-11:05
Distance Learning
Course
Eugene
CPUT, Professor,
In-person, @
Wednesday, September cairncross@cput.ac.za
Cairncross
and course lecturer
CPUT Library
4, 2008, 10:40-11:05
of Distance Learning
Course
Marion Davids
CPUT
In-person, @
Wednesday, September davidsml@cput.ac.za
Environmental
CPUT Library
4, 2008, 11:05-11:40
Resource Centre
Romie Vonkie
EcoAfrica, DLIST
In-person,
Wednesday,September
romie@ecoafrica.co.za
Nghiulikwa
Manager. PMU
EcoAfrica,
4, 14:05~16:30
Observatory,
SA
Kashiefa Parker
EcoAfrica, DLIST
In-person,
Wednesday,September
kashiefa@ecoafrica.co.za
Administrator
EcoAfrica,
4, 14:05~16:30
Observatory,
SA
Raquel Garcia
EcoAfrica (former)
Via Telephone
May 4, 2008 and Sept.
raquel@ecoafrica.co.za
5, 2008 , 10:00-10:20
Rien van der
EcoAfrica, DLIST
In-person,
Sept. 5, 2008 , 13:15-
reanvdm@mweb.co.za
Merve
PMU
EcoAfrica,
14:45
Observatory,
SA
Francois
EcoAfrica, DLIST
In-person,
Sept. 6, 2008 , 11:20-
francois@ecoafrica.co.za
Odendaal
CTA
Pretoria, South
15:00
Africa
Margaret Chi
UNOPS
Via telephone
October 1, 2008, 11:00-
MargaretC@unops.org
11:15
Malinda Gardiner
DLIST User
Via email
Initial contact and
m.gardiner@conservation.org
willingness to respond,
but then she sent back
an email asking for
more time but never
replied with comments.
Annex 5. Logical Framework Analysis. The LFA was compared and evaluated over the baseline, mid-term and final evaluation
period (column: TERMINAL EVALUATION ASSESSMENT) for Key Performance Indicators (KPI) as defined in the LFI. Each key performance
indicator was evaluated and if completely met, a total of one point was scored for each possible outcome. If partially met, each KPI
was scored in increments of 1/3. Total points are summed at the bottom of the table. DLIST scored 13.7 of a total score of 17, or
approximately 80%. This does not reflect the qualitative, and in some cases significant, achievements that DLIST has shown through
its outreach with some communities over the course of the project period.
OUTCOMES
KEY PERFORMANCE
BASELINE, MID-TERM AND END OF
BASELINE, MID-TERM
TERMINAL EVALUATION
IMPACT INDICATORS
PROJECT TARGETS
AND FINAL RESULTS
ASSESSMENT
Project Goal is to ensure
The stated goal appears
that collaborative
to show a disconnect
between its aims and
management arrangements
what DLIST has been
for stress reduction are in
able to and is able to-
place to protect the
provide with respect to
ecological integrity of the
communication and
information sharing. This
transboundary BCLME and
demonstrates a need to
sustain living marine
critically examine and
resources vital to the
align future goals with a
sustainable development of
more realistic
expectation of how
coastal communities
specifics can actually
contribute to over-
arching goals.
Project Objective is to
1. Growing number of
Baseline: 308
Base: 396 users
Target almost met,
bridge the information gap
DLIST registered users
Mid-term target: 500
registered
except for final
by using innovative ICT
that request or contribute
Mid: 533 users
End of project: 800
assessment.
applications to provide
information on the portal
registered
Final: 701 users
access to training and to
2. More distance learning
Baseline: 1 course in CPUT
registered
Score=2/3
increase the flow of
courses available to
Mid-term target: 2 courses
information between
coastal stakeholders
prepared and tested in CPUT
experts, institutions and
and/or UNAM, UAN,
networks and coastal players
Polytechnic Namibia
including communities, as
well as between themselves,
End of project: 4 courses
so a "common pool of
functioning in CPUT, UNAM,
UAN, Polytechnic Namibia
OUTCOMES
KEY PERFORMANCE
BASELINE, MID-TERM AND END OF
BASELINE, MID-TERM
TERMINAL EVALUATION
IMPACT INDICATORS
PROJECT TARGETS
AND FINAL RESULTS
ASSESSMENT
knowledge" is created and
3. Increased geographical
Baseline: mostly South Africa
Courses: Baseline
maintained
area and societal
and Namibia and from cross-
and Mid-term met;
outreach of DLIST
section of society
Final: 3 of 4 courses
fully addressed from
Score=2/3
Mid-term target: at least 1/4
Baseline
from Angola from different
layers of society
End of project: 1/3 from
Angola from different layers
of society
Outcome 1. ICT platform
4. New functions are
Baseline: 6 existing
8 functions operating
Target Met
(to put in place an
installed and existing
functions3
innovative and user friendly
functions are improved on
Mid-term target: 6 existing
Score=1
IT platform for coastal
DLIST
functions improved and 2 new
stakeholders)
functions added4
End of project: 8 functions
operating smoothly
2 additional IT staff
5. People are trained and
Baseline: 2 IT staff trained, 4
trained in Cape Town;
ready to manage and
DLIST administrators in Cape
Target Met
4 DLIST
service the portal and
Town
administrators
maintain the server
Score=1
Mid-term target: 2 more IT
staff trained in Cape Town, 4
new DLIST administrators
End of project: 2 more IT staff
trained in Cape Town, 4 new
DLIST administrators
3 Distance Learning Course, Library, Discussion Forums, Message Board, Kiosks, and Links.
4 911 Help Function and Photo Library.
OUTCOMES
KEY PERFORMANCE
BASELINE, MID-TERM AND END OF
BASELINE, MID-TERM
TERMINAL EVALUATION
IMPACT INDICATORS
PROJECT TARGETS
AND FINAL RESULTS
ASSESSMENT
6. People are trained and
Baseline: 2 IT staff trained &
Not exactly met as
Target Met
ready to manage and
4 DLIST Admin. In CT
per the originally
service the portal and
Mid: 2 more staff trained in
stated KPIs, but the
Score=1
maintain the server
CT; 4 new Administrators
increase in Namibia
mitigates the
variance.
Outcome 2. Course
7. Distance learning
Baseline: 1 course in CPUT
Same as Project
Outcomes almost
development
courses are prepared and
Objective, KPI # 2.
Mid-term target: 2 courses
met, except for
(to offer coastal players a
offered in the three
prepared and tested in CPUT
Final KPI for 4
distance learning course on
countries
and/or UNAM, UAN,
courses in place.
sustainable development in
Polytechnic Namibia
coastal areas)
End of project: 4 courses
Score=2/3
functioning in CPUT, UNAM,
UAN, Polytechnic Namibia
For 2006, total 60 contact
8. Number of distance
Baseline: 55 distance
students thru CPUT, 5
distance learners 2 from
learners with certificate is
learners mainly from South
Namibia and 3 from South
Only Baseline target
growing and is more
Africa and Namibia
Africa
met
diverse in origin and
Mid-term target: 90 distance
position
81 distance learners thru
learners including at least 1/6
CPUT. No Angolans as
from Angola and from varied
University of Agostinho Neto
positions
not able to commit to course
Score=1/3
End of project: 200 distance
For 2008, total 35 contact
learners including at least 1/4
students in thru CPUT, 15
from Angola and from varied
distance learners 12 from
positions
Namibia, 2 from South Africa
and 1 from Cameroon. 7
contact students in through
University of Namibia
Outcome 3. Knowledge
9. Number of sustainable
Baseline: 3
Baseline: 3 Programs in
Targets exceeded
management
development
addition to the baseline level
Mid-term target: 16
are using DIST actively;
(to promote free access and
programmes using DLIST
End of project: 25
Miid: 22 Programmes using
Score=1
flow of information between
actively to post and
DLIST actively;
coastal players)
discuss information is
Final: 37 Programmes using
increasing
DLIST actively
OUTCOMES
KEY PERFORMANCE
BASELINE, MID-TERM AND END OF
BASELINE, MID-TERM
TERMINAL EVALUATION
IMPACT INDICATORS
PROJECT TARGETS
AND FINAL RESULTS
ASSESSMENT
10. Number of postings
Baseline: 608
Baseline: 1150 messages in
and interactive
discussion threads; Mid: 1470
Mid-term target: 900
Targets exceeded
messages in discussion
discussions on DLIST
End of project: 1500
threads; Final: 1865
Score=1
increases
messages in discussion
11. Local moderators are
Baseline: no moderators
threads.
Baseline & Mid-term
engaged in online
B: 3 moderators in South
Mid-term target: 6
Targets exceeded;
Africa; M-T: 10 moderators, 5
facilitation and knowledge
moderators, 2 in each country
in South Africa, 4 in Namibia,
Final not met
"capturing" and
Score=2/3
End of project: 12
1 in Angola; F: 10
organizing
moderators, 5 in South Africa,
moderators, 4 in each country
4 in Namibia,, 1 in Angola
Targets exceeded
12. Number of documents
Baseline: 147
B: 509 docs available
Score=1
available on the DLIST
Mid-term target: 250
M-T: 593 docs available
library
End of project: 400
F: 780 docs available
13. Number of photos
Baseline: none
B: 1040 photos available
Targets met
available on the DLIST
Mid-term target: 500
M-T: 1090 photos available
Score=1
photo library
End of project: 1000
F: 1090 photos available
14. Number of DLIST
Baseline: 5
B: 27 requests on 911 doc'd
Targets met or
users utilizing the 911
Mid-term target: 20
M-T: 50 requests doc'd
exceeded
help function
End of project: 50
F: 155 requests doc'd
Score=1
15. Linkages to other
Baseline: 5
B: 5
Targets have not been met
sustainable development
Mid-term target: 25
M-T: 20 links to networks
quantitatively, but the quality
oriented networks,
End of project: 50
claimed
of the networks established
information nodes
has been significant
F: 37 links to networks
Score=2/3
claimed
Outcome 4. Outreach
16. Number of kiosks for
Baseline: 26
Baseline: 36 Kiosks on DLIST
Targets exceeded
(to make the ICT platform
DLIST partners
Mid-term target: 35
Mid-Term: 40 Kiosks
Score=1
accessible to coastal
Final: 59 Kiosks
End of project: 45
communities)
Targets exceeded for
17. The number of DLIST
Baseline: 0
Baseline and Mid-Term;
not met for final
focal points increases
Mid-term target: 6
Score=2/3
and they are equipped
End of project: 10
and trained
OUTCOMES
KEY PERFORMANCE
BASELINE, MID-TERM AND END OF
BASELINE, MID-TERM
TERMINAL EVALUATION
IMPACT INDICATORS
PROJECT TARGETS
AND FINAL RESULTS
ASSESSMENT
TOTAL POINTS
13.67 of 17
possible points, or
0.80
Annex 6. Financial Planning Co- financing. See detail of in-kind contributions documented over the course of the MSP in Table .2.
Annex 6, Table 1.
IA own
Government
Other*
Total
Total
Financing
Disbursement
Co financing
(UNDP/GEF)
(mill US$)
(mill US$)
(mill US$)
(mill US$)
(Type/Source)
(mill US$)
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Actual
Planned
Planned
Actual
-
Grants
0.75
0.75
0.2
0
0
0
0.95
0.75
0.68
0.54
-
Loans/Concessio
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
nal (compared to
market rate)
-
Credits
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
Equity
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
investments
-
In-kind support
0
0
0
0
0.7
0.44
0.7
0.44
0.7
0.44
-
Other (*)
Totals
0.75
0.75
0.2
0
0.7
0.44
1.65
1.19
1.14
0.98
*
Other is referred to Contributions mobilized for the project from other multilateral agencies, bilateral development cooperation agencies, NGOs,
the private sector and beneficiaries.
Leveraged Resources
Leveraged resources are additional resources--beyond those committed to the project itself at the time of approval--that are mobilized later as a
direct result of the project. Leveraged resources can be financial or in-kind and they may be from other donors, NGO's, foundations, governments,
communities or the private sector. Please briefly describe the resources the project has leveraged since inception and indicate how these resources
are contributing to the project's ultimate objective.
24
Annex 6, Table 2. Details of co-financing as documented by IKM
Total
Planned
Contributions
Co- Financing Institutions
Commitments
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
in Rands
Total USD
IKM
$30,000.00
Auditors
R 15,500.00
R 15,500.00
R 15,500.00
R 46,500.00
IKM Attandace to SC meetings
R 13,000.00
R 8,000.00
R 21,000.00
Attendance of DLIST outreach workshop in Namibia by IKM
members (time, flights, accommodation costs)
R 11,500.00
R 11,500.00
Attendance of DLIST outreach workshop in South Africa (Cape
Town) by IKM members (time, flights, accommodation costs)
R 11,500.00
R 11,500.00
Attendance of DLIST knowledge management workshop in
South Africa (Pretoria) (time, flights, accommodation costs)
R 75,500.00
R 75,500.00
Attendance of IKM members at the cultural mapping workshop
(flights, accommodation costs)
R 45,500.00
R 45,500.00
Total IKM Contributions
R 28,500.00
R 46,500.00
R 136,500.00
R 211,500.00
$30,171.18
Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT)
$69,500.00
Space (ERC)
R 31,200.00
R 31,200.00
R 31,200.00
R 93,600.00
Attendance of SC meetings
R 3,000.00
R 13,000.00
R 13,000.00
R 29,000.00
Staff time - Environmental Engineering Course
R 60,000.00
R 60,000.00
R 60,000.00
R 180,000.00
Staff time - Environmental Issues of the 21st Century
R 30,000.00
R 30,000.00
Staff time - Assistance to the development of the Polytechnic
Course (Cleaner Production)
R 30,000.00
R 30,000.00
Marion's time (ERC)
R 14,400.00
R 14,400.00
R 14,400.00
R 43,200.00
Hosting DLIST Server
R 20,000.00
R 20,000.00
R 20,000.00
R 60,000.00
Special Technician to maintain Server
R 5,000.00
R 5,000.00
R 5,000.00
R 15,000.00
Computers (8)
R 50,000.00
R 50,000.00
Total CPUT Contributions
R 183,600.00
R 143,600.00
R 203,600.00
R 530,800.00
$75,720.40
25
EcoAfrica
$30,000.00
Book Keeping
R 18,000.00
R 18,000.00
R 18,000.00
R 54,000.00
Financial Administration
R 24,000.00
R 24,000.00
R 24,000.00
R 72,000.00
Space for the hard copies library
R 10,800.00
R 10,800.00
R 10,800.00
R 32,400.00
Space in EA offices and Communication Costs
R 13,800.00
R 13,800.00
R 13,800.00
R 41,400.00
Total EcoAfrica Contributions
R 66,600.00
R 66,600.00
R 66,600.00
R 199,800.00
$28,502.14
DLIST Users
$330,000.00
Contribution to discussions (time, internet costs)
R 121,000.00
R 121,000.00
R 121,000.00
R 363,000.00
Attendance of DLIST outreach workshops in Namibia
R 65,000.00
R 65,000.00
Attendance of DLIST outreach workshops in South Africa
R 65,000.00
R 65,000.00
Participation in DLIST outreach activities in Angola
R 45,000.00
R 45,000.00
Participation in DLIST outreach activities in Namibia
R 45,000.00
R 45,000.00
EIA course
R 50,000.00
R 50,000.00
Various brochures, posters, collaborative events (Walvis Bay
Municipality)
R 50,000.00
R 50,000.00
NACOMA Sponsorships (Distance Learning)
R 15,900.00
R 15,900.00
NACOMA contribution to outreach activities (time)
R 5,000.00
R 5,000.00
R 5,000.00
R 15,000.00
Walvis Bay MPC (staff time and space)
R 20,000.00
R 20,000.00
R 40,000.00
BCLME Marine Litter
R 340,000.00
R 340,000.00
Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources (staff time -
participation in the DLIST outreach activities, attendance of the
SC meeting)
R 17,000.00
R 15,000.00
R 25,000.00
R 57,000.00
Henties Bay Research Center (staff time, attendance of the
IWC, involvement in DLIST outreach activities, space for the
DLIST node)
R 25,000.00
R 25,000.00
R 50,000.00
NBC Collaboration (space, staff time, sending out the message
to the target population)
R 50,000.00
R 50,000.00
Karas Community Radio (space, staff time, sending out the
message to the target population)
R 25,000.00
R 25,000.00
Radio Namaqualand (space, staff time, sending out the message
to the target population)
R 25,000.00
R 25,000.00
Film Festival (time, hosting, contribution)
R 200,000.00
R 200,000.00
26
Bitterfontein Information Centre (space)
R 30,000.00
R 30,000.00
R 60,000.00
Keetmanshoop Multipurpose Centre (hosting DLIST outreach
activities)
R 20,000.00
R 20,000.00
Total DLIST Users Contributions
R 823,000.00
R 186,000.00
R 541,900.00
R 1,580,900.00
$225,520.68
USAID
$200,000.00
Satelite link ups
R 0.00
R 0.00
R 0.00
R 0.00
Training
R 0.00
R 0.00
R 0.00
R 0.00
Community radio station
R 0.00
R 0.00
R 0.00
R 0.00
R 0.00
UNAM
$29,500.00
Improvement of course
R 40,000.00
R 40,000.00
Attendance of workshops (Ignatius)
R 10,000.00
R 10,000.00
Attendance of IWC (Ignatius)
R 20,000.00
R 20,000.00
Attendance of IWC (Msangi)
R 20,000.00
R 20,000.00
Attendance of SC meetings (Msangi)
R 10,000.00
R 10,000.00
R 20,000.00
Attendance of SC meetings (Ignatius)
R 5,000.00
Computers for the ICZM Course
R 51,000.00
Attendance of Course Workshop at Polytechnic
R 30,000.00
R 30,000.00
Total UNAM contributions
R 40,000.00
R 60,000.00
R 96,000.00
R 196,000.00
$27,960.06
Polytechnic of Namibia
Cleaner Production Course
R 40,000.00
Staff attandance at the course workshop
R 30,000.00
R 30,000.00
Space for course workshop
R 5,000.00
R 5,000.00
Attendance of SC meetings (Maritjie)
R 10,000.00
Attendance of SC meetings (Maritjie)
R 10,000.00
R 10,000.00
R 20,000.00
Total Polytechnic contribution
R 55,000.00
R 10,000.00
R 40,000.00
R 105,000.00
$14,978.60
Francois Odendaal Productions (FOP)
Image Library
R 90,000.00
R 90,000.00
Claudio's time
R 45,000.00
R 95,000.00
27
Total FOP Contributions
R 185,000.00
$26,390.87
UAN
Attendance to course workshops
R 50,000.00
R 50,000.00
Total UAN Contributions
R 50,000.00
$7,132.67
Total Contributions (Co-financing)
$436,376.60
Source: International Knowledge Management (IKM), October 7, 2008
28
Annex 7. LIST OF ACRONYMS RELEVANT TO THE DLIST TERMINAL EVALUATION
ASCLME
Agulhas-Somali Current Large Marine Ecosystem
BCLME
Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem
BENEFIT
Benguela Environment Fisheries Interaction and Training Programme
CPUT
Cape Peninsula University of Technology (South Africa)
CBD
Convention on Biological Diversity
CBNRM
Community-Based Natural Resources Management
CBO
Community-Based Organization
CPA
Community Property Association (South Africa)
CTA
Chief Technical Advisor
DEA&T
Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (South Africa)
DLIST
Distance Learning and Information Sharing Tool
ERC
Environmental Resource Centre
FOP
Francois Odendaal Productions
GEF
Global Environment Facility
IBCC
Interim Benguela Current Commission
ICT
Information and Communication Technology
IDP
Integrated Development Plan
IKM
International Knowledge Management
IIM
Instituto de Investigação Marinha or Marine Research Institute (Angola)
IPA
Instituto de Desenvolvimento da Pesca Artesanal or Institute for Development
of Artisanal Fisheries (Angola)
IRDNC
Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation (Namibia)
IW
International Waters
LME
Large Marine Ecosystem
MACEMP
Marine and Coastal Environment Management Project (Tanzania)
MCM
Marine and Coastal Management (South Africa)
MPRC
Multi-Purpose Resource Centre
MSP
Medium Sized Project (GEF)
NACOMA
Namib Coast Biodiversity Conservation and Management (Namibia)
NBSAP
National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (Angola)
NDP
National Development Plan
NGO
Non-Governmental Organisation
PMU
Project Management Unit (based with EcoAfrica)
UAN
University Agostinho Neto (Angola)
UNAM
University of Namibia
UNDP
United Nations Development Programme
UNOPS
United Nations Office for Project Services
USAID
United States Agency for International Development
29
Annex 8. List of number of total document downloaded by DLIST users not
affiliated with Distance Learning Courses. Source: DLIST PMU, August, 2008
Doc ID
File Title of Document Downloaded (over entire MSP)
#Downloads
610
Map: the Strandloper Guide to the Namaqualand Coast
569
590
DLIST -Benguela CPUT Course Mailer
59
670
Poverty and Tourism
57
574
Scope of work for country assistants FINAL.doc
57
426
air quality act.pdf
55
665
Population-Development-Environment in Namibia
54
643
The Richtersveld Community Conservancy eNewsletter - Feb 07
48
869
Protocol on ICZM in the Mediterranean: Spanish
43
753
Open Source GIS Software
39
651
Tourism in the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area
38
511
Summary BEHP IA-03-03
36
437
biodiversity act.pdf
36
473
Autumn Newsletter. Port Nolloth Heritage Trust
34
770
Marine Research Assistants needed
33
666
Waste Water and Energy Audit
33
658
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis - Summary for
33
Policy Makers
870
Protocol on ICZM in the Mediterranean: Arabic
32
571
Port Nolloth Heritage Trust & Museum Newsletter: Sep06
32
456
NAMIBIA: CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS KUDU GAS
32
696
Conservation International Workshop Flyer
31
587
BCLME Mid Term Evaluation Report
29
534
WWWWinter Newsletter. Port Nolloth Heritage Trust
29
44
Articles on the Mowe Bay Fishing Report
29
868
Protocol on ICZM in the Mediterranean
28
591
ORI postgraduate positions 2007
28
22
Action urged on sea tragedies
28
663
Fax
27
609
Brochure: the Strandloper guide to the Namaqualand Coast
27
871
The Island in the Sky
25
573
DLIST Benguela Workshop Invitation Letter
25
29
Integrated Coastal Zone Management of the Erongo Region
25
13
BCLME Project Document
25
516
Summary PCU-BCC-04-01
24
441
Brief Overview of EIA for Project Development and Planning in South
24
Africa
36
Red card for tourism? Press release
23
702
Environmental Rights Afforded to Residents Affected by Mining
22
Activities: A Case Study in Hondeklip Bay: Dissertation
627
BCLME Project BEHP/ML/03/01: "Marine Litter Programme"
22
539
Kudu Power Project Update
22
39
Responsible Tourism Guidelines
22
577
DLIST SA workshop programme
21
570
whitley awards 2007.doc
21
30
46
African leaders meet in Durban to bury the OAU
21
633
Planning and Managing Sustainable Off Road Routes: A Guide for
20
Route Planners and Operators
875
The Human Dimension of Desertification in the Drylands of Africa
19
636
Our Coast Our Future: A New Approach to Coastal Management in
19
South Africa
520
Summary BEHP-BAC-Workshop-04-01
19
53
Unfolding the Big Picture Workshop 2-3 May 2002 - part 1
19
859
Environmental Management Act
18
754
From Grain Pits to Silos-Indigenous Knowledge Series
18
708
Case Studies on Investment on Community Land in Southern Africa
18
592
The Pan African LME Forum
18
589
Strategic Planning workshop
18
867
Review on Aquaculture Development Sub Saharan Africa
17
840
A review of Aquaculture Policy and Institutional Capacity in the BCLME
17
Region, with Recommended Regional Policy Options
814
A Coastal Areas Protection Policy for New Brunswick
17
701
Bioprospecting: from theory to practice (and back again)
17
656
Objections to new housing development in Veldrift region
17
50
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY BUILDING AND A
17
COLLECTIVE APPROACH TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE
COASTAL AREAS OF THE NORTHERN CAPE SOUTH AFRICA.: Part 3
49
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY BUILDING AND A
17
COLLECTIVE APPROACH TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE
COASTAL AREAS OF THE NORTHERN CAPE SOUTH AFRICA.: Part 2
48
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY BUILDING AND A
17
COLLECTIVE APPROACH TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE
COASTAL AREAS OF THE NORTHERN CAPE SOUTH AFRICA.: Part 1
20
Local Government Declaration to the World Summit on Sustainable
17
Development
12
Concluding Remarks - Oceans & Coasts 201
17
916
A transboundary survey of pelagic fish in Southern Angola and
16
Northern Namibia
865
Aquaculture gets a Second Chance in SA
16
712
A Situational/Status Analysis of the Misali Island Project, Pemba
16
Zanzibar
689
BEHP/EEF/03/01/02: By Catch of Threatened Seabirds Sharks and
16
Turtles in Longline Fisheries in the BCLME Ecosystem: An Integrated
Approach
652
West Coast District Municipality Notice
16
620
Park pricing and economic efficiency in Namibia
16
617
Background to the ICM Bill
16
569
Richtersveld National Park Management Plan
16
544
EIA and Sustainable Development: Key Concepts and Tools
16
513
Summary LMR-MC-03-01
16
26
Conservation & Development Workshop: Building Partnerships for
16
Sustainable and Equitable Resource Use
872
Biodiversity Report for the Municipality of Walvis Bay
15
762
Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and Poverty
15
Reduction in Subsaharan Africa - A learning Study Synthesis
31
680
New drive for quad-bike ban
15
616
Public Participation for ICM Bill
15
576
DLIST SA workshop invitation
15
566
Solar Energy Made Simple
15
561
Tourism and Deserts: A Practical Guide to Managing the Social and
15
Environmental Impacts in the Desert Recreation Sector
556
Renewables in Global Energy Supply: An IEA Factsheet
15
549
Coastline Strategic Environmental Assessment: Namibia
15
524
Summary EV-Angola-03-03
15
523
Summary EV-Angola-03-01
15
518
Summary EV-LS-02-02
15
512
Summary LMR-COM-03-01
15
18
DLIST Regional Training Workshop Report
15
17
State's shortlist of bidders for Alexkor on the horizon- Miningweb July
15
292002
855
National Agricultural Policy
14
751
Bycatch Reduction - WWF
14
713
A Thousand and One Nights of Land Tenure
14
674
DLIST Marine Litter Brochure: English
14
672
Marine Litter Teachers Manual
14
659
The Economic Impacts of Climate Change in South Africa: A
14
Preliminary Analysis of Unmitigated Damage Costs
517
Summary EV-HAB-02-03
14
514
Summary PCU-BCC-04-02
14
440
Guidelines for Environmental Management Plans (EMPs)
14
40
Towards integrated development planning in the Karas region
14
687
Integrated management of the Benguela Current Region: A Framwork
13
for Future Development
686
Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Management with
13
Environmental Impact Assessment
638
Changes in Ecological and Socio-Economic Conditions in the Greater
13
St Lucia Wetland Park Since Implementation of the Regulations for the
Control of Vehicles in the Coastal Zone
632
NBSAP Angola.pdf
13
601
Grootberg Lodge Environmental Management Plan
13
598
DEAT List of Scheduled Activities R386
13
593
Environmental Impact Assessment Training Resource Manual
13
583
Summary Report LMR/CF/03/02
13
572
DLIST Benguela Workshop Programme
13
547
Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental
13
Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach
543
Can environmental Assessment Reduce Poverty
13
527
Summary EV-Provare-02-01
13
58
Government set to appoint body to oversee mineral rights
13
37
Red card for tourism? 10 challenges & principles for a sustainable
13
tourism development.
10
Richtersveld Local Municipality Integrated Development Plan 2002
13
853
Environment Conservation Amendment Bill
12
32
836
Creating a cleaner CDM
12
772
Collect Waste for Recycling Leaflet
12
698
LMR/EAF/03/01 - Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management in the
12
BCLME, Report of the 3rd Workshop, Cape Town 2006
697
BCLME/LMR/CF/03/06 - Potential Shared Hake Stocks, Research
12
Planning Meeting (Namibia and South Africa)
677
Assessment and Evaluation of Proposed and Existing Off Road Routes
12
- A Guide for Environmental Practitioners Authorities and Route
Planners
669
National Environmental Management Biodiversity Act 10 of 2004:
12
Threatened or Protected Species Regulations
635
Brochure: Environmental Ethics and Sustainable Use of Off Road
12
Routes and Trails
578
Coastal Water Quality 2005 Status Report for the City of Cape Town
12
567
True Costs of Nuclear Power
12
551
Cape Town Energy Strategy
12
548
Environmental Impact Assessment: Wiomsa
12
526
Summary EV-HAB-02-02a
12
525
Summary EV-HAB-02-01
12
515
Summary PCU-TCB-03-01
12
430
INFORMATION DOCUMENT ON REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT
12
55
Unfolding the Big Picture Workshop 2-3 May 2002 - part 3
12
42
Sea of change
12
38
Responsible Tourism Guidelines - backgound
12
21
Nam Signs SEAFO Convention
12
15
The MMSD southern Africa regional report
12
845
SEA Manual.pdf
11
809
State of Environment Report of Waste Management and Pollution
11
control in Namibia
720
CMPP - Related Initiatives Currently Underway in South Africa, Report
11
5 Northern Cape Province
691
LMR/SE/03/03: Report on the Biological Social and Economic Impacts
11
of Right Allocations in the BCLME Region
690
BEHP/EEF/03/01/02: Optimal Line sink Rates: Mitigating Seabird
11
Mortality in the South African Longline Fisheries
675
DLIST Marine Litter Brochure: Portuguese
11
563
Case Studies on Successful Southern African NRM Initiatives and their
11
Impacts on Poverty and Governance
545
Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Rapidly Evolving Approach
11
540
Nuclear Energy Act 1999
11
27
Incremental Value of Poverty Alleviation Funding for Sustainable
11
Development : a case study from Namaqualand South Africa.
25
Business govt join hands for educators
11
24
S.A Mining's do-or-die race experiment
11
874
Implementing the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
10
in Africa
873
Women of the Earth: Nuturing the Future
10
854
Prevention and Combating of Pollution of the Sea
10
771
Draft Waste Management Bill South Africa (2006)
10
33
767
SA Sustainable Seafood Initiative Pocket Guide
10
750
Bycatch Fact Sheet - WWF
10
730
Robben Island Proposed Visitor Upgrades - Initial EIA
10
715
Environmental Impact Assessment Guidelines and Administrative
10
Procedures
692
LMR/SE/03/02: Market Analysis of Major Fish Product Markets in the
10
BCLME
673
Benguela_Fisheries_Pelagic Birds.pdf
10
599
DEAT Regulations in terms of chapter 5 of NEMA (1998) - R385
10
596
Environmental Management Bill (2002) of Namibia
10
580
City of Cape Town's Coastal Zone Management Strategy Review and
10
State of the Coast
554
How Will Global Warming Affect my World?
10
546
Environmental Management Systems and ISO 1400
10
536
White Paper on the Renewable Energy Policy of the Republic of South
10
Africa
439
Guidelines for public Participation in the EIA process
10
431
GUIDELINES FOR GOLF COURSES GOLF ESTATES POLO FIELDS
10
AND POLO ESTATES
54
Unfolding the Big Picture Workshop 2-3 May 2002 - part 2
10
33
ORM Development Plan
10
19
Enforcement is key - M&G
10
16
The MMSD southern Africa regional report: Executive Summary
10
895
TRANSFORM: Lessons Learnt from Implementing CBNRM in SA
9
876
Corporate Social Responsibility in mining in Southern Africa: Fair
9
accountability or just greenwash?
851
Review of existing institutional mandates and policies
9
759
Aquaculture and Drought
9
757
Global Deserts Outlook
9
746
Marine Aquaculture Policy South Africa
9
731
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands - Wise Use of Wetlands
9
653
Speech
9
603
SA Governments Batho Pele Principles
9
588
Workshop Report March 2004
9
560
Artisanal Fisheries in Angola
9
557
South Africa Country Analysis Brief
9
541
Occupational Health and Safety Act 1993
9
528
Summary LMR-COM-03-02
9
519
Summary EV-SADCO-03-01
9
57
Draft strategy on enhancing the engagement of civil society in the work
9
of UNEP
56
HIV/AIDS STRATEGY for the RICHTERSVELD
9
41
UNDP AND GOVERNANCE
9
34
ORM Development Plan - Synthesis Report
9
30
ORM Development Plan - Institutional Support study
9
23
Mozambique to shop giant dam plan in Europe
9
921
Mitigation of human-elephant conflict in the Kavango-Zambezi TFCA
8
850
Water Act
8
34
849
The National Integrated Waste Management Bill
8
846
Environmental Assessment Policy for Sustainable Development and
8
Environmental Conservation
810
National Environmental Management: Waste Management
8
789
Adding Value to Indigenous Knowledge through Scientific Innovation
8
769
Documento discussao politica zonas humidas Angola
8
765
Spacial Policy Planning in the Western Cape
8
763
City of Cape Town Waste Drop Off Facilities
8
758
Country Report: Angola In: Environmental Impact Assessment in
8
Southern Africa
727
The Ramsar Convention Manual: A Guide to the Convention on
8
Wetlands
722
Mosoala Peninsula Integrated Conservation and Development Project
8
Marine Resources Component
721
Knysna Quays Environmental Impact Assessment
8
717
CMPP - Related Initiatives Currently Underway in South Africa
8
694
Regional Zooplankton Taxonomy and IdentificationTraining Workshop:
8
Swakopmund January 2007: Workshop Report
684
Marine Litter Teachers Manual: International Coastal Cleanup Data
8
Card
678
DLIST Marine Litter Brochure: Walvis Bay
8
631
Updated contingency plan - without Annex 3.pdf
8
621
Evaluation Report - Integrated Coastal Management Bill
8
618
Integrated Coastal Management Bill Part 1
8
602
DLIST Benguela Workshop Proceedings South Africa
8
600
DEAT List of Scheduled Activities R387
8
594
Environmental Management Act 2004 Tanzania
8
586
Summary Report LMR/CF/03/07
8
558
Angola: Country Analysis Brief
8
550
Environmental Impact Assessment for Whose Needs
8
542
National Nuclear Regulator Act 1999
8
533
Better Environment Better Tourism: Building the Age of Hope in SA
8
522
Summary LMR-CF-03-04
8
31
ORM Development Plan - Funding Strategy
8
28
Mining Minerals & Sustainable Development in southern Africa
8
877
Stories for Fire Dogs: Opening our Hearts to the Earth
7
864
Analysis of Marine Aquaculture Developments in Namibia
7
844
The ABUJA Declaration on Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture in
7
Africa
841
Implementation Plan for BCLME Regional Aquaculture Policy Options
7
832
The Clean Development Mechanism: Building International Public-
7
Private Partnership under the Kyoto Protocol
829
Towards National Integrated Coastal Management Policy:
7
Recommendation and Responses
827
Sustainable Coastal Policy Development in the Netherlands. A
7
Systematic Approach Revealed
821
Coastal Management in the 21st Century: Coping Strategies for
7
Vulnerability Reduction
815
National Environmental Management: Integrated Coastal Management
7
35
Bill
807
Oil pollution prevention, waste minimisation, impact management &
7
remediation policy
806
Marine Traffic Act
7
802
Walvis Bay and Off-shore Islands Act
7
766
SA Sustainable Seafood Initiative Booklet
7
764
City of Cape Town Integrated Waste Management Policy
7
743
Social Impact Assessment Report for a Lodge at Tondooni, Pemba
7
Island, Zanzibar
729
Sustainable Land Tenure and Land Registration in Developing
7
Countries
723
Report of the EIA for the Vilanculous Coastal Wildlife Sanctuary
7
(Interim Report)
716
Knysna Western Heads Local Structure Plan
7
714
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: Designating Ramsar Sites
7
693
Regional Zooplankton Taxonomy and Indentification Training
7
Workshop: Guide to some common copepods in the BCLME
683
Marine Litter Teachers Manual: Activitry Guide
7
668
Implementation Guidelines: Threatened or Protected Species (TOPS)
7
Regulations
654
Speech 2
7
637
Policy for the Allocation and Management of Medium Term Small Scale
7
Commercial Fishing Rights: 2006
624
SA Regulations on ORV - Ammendments 2004
7
604
Policy Brief: Climate and Development
7
595
Guidelines for the Preparation of Environmental Reports for Hotel
7
Projects in Zanzibar
575
Scope of work for metadata assistant FINAL.doc
7
565
Nuclear Reactions: A British Case Study
7
564
THE IMPACT OF THE USE OF ENERGY SOURCES ON THE QUALITY
7
OF LIFE OF POOR COMMUNITIES
553
Towards the Development of an Integrated Energy Strategy for the
7
Western Cape
521
Summary LMR-CF-03-01
7
442
Feasibility study of the south-east extension of PIRATA (Pilot Moored
7
Array in the Tropical Atlantic
438
Guidelines for Resort Developments in the Western Cape
7
436
Erongo Regional Development Plan 1997 2000
7
433
System of Strengtherning Protected Areas Network in Namibia
7
429
Marine Living Resources Act No 18 of 1998
7
425
Environmental Conservation Act No 50 of 2003(Ammendment)
7
59
Southern Africa Hotspots Program
7
51
Gap between rich poor stirs anger at Aids meeting
7
45
NEPAD to build tunnel to Europe
7
43
Minerals Bill stalled
7
35
Nepad plans to crack down on rogue states
7
32
ORM Development Plan - Legal scan
7
14
Transform Training and Support for Resource Management Programme
7
900
Legal and Institutional Framework for the Artisanal Fishries Sector in
6
36
the BCLME region
860
Solutions for Sustainable Mariculture
6
856
Namibia Wildlife Resorts Company Act, 1998
6
847
Policy Statement on the Granting of Rights of exploitation to utilize
6
marine resources and on the allocation of fishing quotas
842
Development of Small-scale Aquaculture Farming Systems: Western
6
Cape
838
Cleaner Production for Small to Medium Sized Enterprises
6
835
Environmental Management Systems: An Implementation Guide for
6
Small and Medium-Sized Organisations
834
National Cleaner Production Strategy. Draft for comments - national
6
and regional workshops
833
Sustainable consumption and production in Asia and the Pacific
6
831
Towards a European Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM)
6
Strategy: General Principles and Policy Options
830
Coastal Management Act 1995
6
824
Integrated Coastal Zone Management: International Commitments
6
818
Evaluation of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in Europe:
6
Final Report
816
Western Cape Integrated Coastal Management Programme
6
801
Wreck and Salvage Act
6
800
Regional Councils Amendment Act 2002
6
799
Forest Amendment Act
6
787
Indigenous knowledge for development
6
784
Namibia - Aquaculture Strategic Plan
6
782
Lei de bases do Ambiente
6
773
Nuclear Energy Policy and Strategy South Africa Draft
6
761
Indigenous peoples, indigenous voices
6
755
Mining and Protected Areas
6
740
Manual do Professor sobre Lixo Marinho: Actividades dentro e fora da
6
sala de aula
735
The Richtersveld - The Lost World
6
732
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands - Wetland Inventory
6
728
Rural Development Lesssons Learned by the TRANSFORM Project
6
682
Marine Litter Teachers Manual: Coastal Cleanup Methodology
6
681
Marine Litter Teachers Manual: Coastal Cleanup Data Card
6
676
ORV Letter to Stakeholders
6
657
Using resource economics for natural resource management: Namibia
6
experience.
626
Tourists' willingness to pay for wildlife viewing and wildlife
6
conservation in Namibia
585
Summary Report EV/Angola/03/06
6
584
Summary EV/HAB/02/05
6
579
GUIDELINES ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATIONS
6
PERTAINING TO THE
568
Marine Protected Areas: the Case of Kisite National Marine Park and
6
Mpunguti Marine National Reserve Kenya
562
Knowledge Management and Natural Resources in Africa: perspectives
6
from two networks
37
555
Energising South African Cities and Towns
6
538
Wind Farm Development and Nature Conservation
6
427
National Heritage Resources Act no 25 of 1999
6
47
Transfrontier Conservation Areas (TFCAs) in southern Africa
6
866
Integrated Aquaculture-Agriculture Systems
5
862
Regulamento Geral da Pesca Angola
5
861
Regulamento da Aquicultura Angola
5
852
Subdivision of Agricultural land Act
5
843
Handbook on the Artificial Reproduction and Pond Rearing of the
5
African Catfish Clarias gariepinus in Sub-saharan Africa
826
Review of Integrated Coastal Zone Management and Principlals of Best
5
Practice
825
New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement
5
823
Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in the Bahamas
5
822
Coastal Management in Australia: Key Institutional and Governance
5
Issues for Coastal Natural Resource Management and Planning
820
White Paper: Coastal Zone Management in the Mediterranean
5
819
Coastal Protection Policy for Western Australia: A Department for
5
Planning and Infrastructure Operational Policy
817
Coastal Zone Management Strategy
5
804
Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone of Namibia, Act 3 of 1996
5
795
Water Resources Management Act, 2004
5
791
Weathering the Storm
5
775
The Future of Genetically Modified Crops
5
768
Towards a Draft National Wetlands Policy for Angola
5
756
The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
5
739
Visitor Market Assessment for the Cape Peninsula National Park
5
738
Handbook in Assessment of Institutional Sustainability
5
737
Feasibility Study of the Proposed Tourism Development in Shewula,
5
North-Eastern Swaziland
725
Regional Environmental Assessment
5
724
Ransar Convention on Wetlands - Participatory Management
5
719
CMPP - Related Initiatives Currently Underway in South Africa, Report
5
4 Western Cape Province
718
CMPP - Related Initiatives Currently Underway in South Africa, Report
5
3 Eastern Cape Province
688
PCU/BCC/04/02: Final Report: Economic Study and Cost Benefit
5
Analysis of Cooperative Research and Management for the BCLME
679
Supervan switches venue for quad-bike dune race
5
664
Kerzner Sets Sights on Namaqualand
5
619
Integrated Coastal Management Bill Part 2
5
582
Local Responses to Marine Conservation in Zanzibar Tanzania
5
552
Energy Efficiency Strategy of the Republic of South Africa
5
432
National Environment Management: Protected Areas Ammendment Act
5
428
National Water Act no 36 of 1998
5
424
National Environmental Management Act No. 107 of 1998
5
913
A review of the impacts of seismic surveying and toxicity of oil
4
products
858
Challenging the Aquaculture Industry
4
38
848
National Forestry Policy
4
828
The National Integrated Coastal Zone Management Strategy for Belize
4
811
White Paper on a National Water Policy for South Africa
4
808
Environmental Management Bill 2007
4
805
Marine Fisheries Regulations
4
796
Local Authorities Amendment Act
4
794
Forest Act 12 of 2001
4
793
Marine Resources Act
4
790
Defining the Traditional Small Scale Fisheries Sector in SA
4
788
Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge
4
785
Banking on Sustainability
4
781
Lei dos diamantes
4
780
Lei sobre as águas interiores, o mar territorial e a zona económica
4
exclusiva
779
Decree on environmental protection for petroleum industry
4
776
Climate Change and Food Security
4
752
What's the Catch, Reducing Bycatch in European Distant Waters
4
Fisheries
749
Catch Fish not Turtles, the Use of Longlines - WWF
4
747
The Abuja Declaration for Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture in
4
Africa
734
The Richtersveld Community Conservancy - An Oasis in the Richest
4
Desert on Earth
726
Report of the 2nd Ecotourism Trial Run, Mosoala Peninsula,
4
Madagascar
685
Marine Litter Teachers Manual: Coastal Steward Class Pledge
4
623
SA Regulations on ORV - 2001
4
915
Assessing the potential for producing final ocean colour maps for
3
Namibia's marine environment
914
Transboundary study with emphasis on deep water hake in the
3
Luderitz/Orange River Cone area
911
Survey of Transboundary Demersal Fish Stocks in Southern Namibia
3
907
Viumbe Hai - African Cities, Ecosystems and Biodiversity
3
905
Emerging Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility in the Mining
3
Industry
901
Assessment of the Cumulative Effects of Sediment Discharge from on
3
shore and Near Shore Diamond Mining Activities
899
The Changing State of the BCLME: Expert Workshop on Climate
3
Change and Variability
839
The Southern African Marine Aquarium Fish Breeders
3
812
National Plan of Action to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal,
3
unreported and unregulated fishing
803
Promotion of community-based tourism
3
798
Nature Conservation Amendment Act, 1996
3
786
Invaders of the Seas
3
783
Namibia Aquaculture Act of 2002
3
774
Aids Epidemic Update 2007
3
748
Working with Ecuadorian Fishing Community to Reduce Mortality of
3
Sea Turtles in Longlines
39
745
Tanzania Mariculture Guidelines Source Book
3
744
West Coast Regional Development Study - 1993
3
741
The Logical Framework Approach
3
733
Taking Charge
3
622
Background to the ICM Bill
3
537
Electromagnetic Compatability (EMC) Aspects Associated with the
3
Proposed Klipheuwel Windfarm
910
Development of a Common Set of Water and Sediment Quality
2
Guidelines for the BCLME Region
909
Report on Harmful Algal Blooms Workshop and Distance Learning
2
Course
906
The Local Action for Biodiversity (LAB) Initiative
2
903
Uranium Mining and the Question of Corporate Social Responsibility
2
902
Corporate Social Responsibility and the Mining Industry
2
898
Integration and Review of Training and Capacity Building in the BCLME
2
Programm
897
Baseline Assessment of Sources & Management of Land Based Marine
2
Pollution in BCLME
896
Benguela Current Commission Economic Study
2
863
Lei dos Recursos Biologicos Aquaticos
2
837
Cleaning up: Experience and Knowledge to Finance Investments in
2
Cleaner Production
797
Namibia Ports Authority Act, 1994
2
736
Strategic Plan for the Management of the Coastal Zone of Masoala
2
Peninsula, Madagascar
559
Angola's Oil Exploration
2
912
Report on the BCLME Southern Boundary Workshop
1
908
Assessment of the Ecological Importance of Pelagic Fish and Gobies
1
in the Functioning of the BCLME
904
CSR in the Mining Industry - the Risk of Community Dependency
1
813
Namibia's Marine Resources Policy: Towards Responsible
1
Development and Management of the Marine Resources Sector
646
Ship-board abalone aquaculture project is a success
1
4952
40
Annex 9. Example of DLIST Discussion Forum thread citing the need for translation of
content.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:Re: [DLIST Discuss] Human Wildlife Conflict
Date:Thu, 15 May 2008 12:24:06 +0200
From:Nico E. Willemse <versacon@iway.na>
Reply-To:General Discussion <discuss@dlist-benguela.org>
To:General Discussion <discuss@dlist-benguela.org>
References:<98244.66068.qm@web65402.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
The responses were indeed very good. Most contributors referred to
project reports/ documents. Are these in a language intelligible for
local communities or are they meant for the more academically inclined.
If the info is required at ground level it should be presented in such
a manner.
It is one thing I've noticed about community-focused/ rural devt
projects. Many produce excellent information about their work
(replicable approaches, best practices, lessons learned) but there's
many a time the shortcoming of not diversifying knowledge and
information material for use by local communities and practitioners.
Just a thought! As far as possible I always encourage projects to not
only solidly budget for the glossy reports, but also for the
diversification of information material to reach more people.
After all, who are we advocating to.
41
Annex 10. This `Junior Ranger Guide' is one example of an inexpensive tool that could
be used to engage youth to learn about the natural resources of a given area. This
example is from Cumberland Island National Seashore, based in the southern USA (a
barrier island on the order of the states Georgia and Florida). The guide is offered to all
young children visiting the seashore. Upon successful completion of the activities on the
guide, it is returned to a Park Ranger who rates it and then awards a participating child a
Junior Ranger Badge. It has proven effective in enrolling children to pay close attention
to and appreciate their local environment while visiting the National Seashore.
If one wishes to see how the guide is constructed, there are eight pages following. They
should be printed two sides to each page in the order of the pages that follow, and then
folded into a small booklet. (i.e. the first page represents the front and
back cover of the Guide). It is offered here as one example of simple outreach in isolated
coastal communities that is inexpensive to reproduce, but has impact in spreading
information and raising awareness.
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Annex 11. Comments by stakeholders (only in case of discrepancies with evaluation
findings and conclusions)
51
Document Outline