LESSONS-LEARNT: negative
lNeeds of smaller Pacific SIDS not adequately considered. (Country needs assessment & specific approaches required.)‏
l
l\Some key stakeholders not involved (eg USP in capacity-building and SPREP in biodiversity conservation). (Need for wider engagement of CROPS etc. in future)‏
l
lSome National coordination (NCCs) inadequate. Limited govt capacities, aid overly bureaucratic, excessive reporting & meetings etc?. (Need for other approaches)
l
lInformation dissemination inadequate. (Need for wider public information and media programmes to inform and engage other stakeholders (eg  other Government Departments, industry, community NGOs, schools etc.)‏
l
lPCU insufficiently resourced for large and complex project. (Need for greater resources to PCU.)
l
lAdaptive management limited. Lack of flexibility in budgets. Currency fluctuations. MTE Lags. (Need for great contingency finding in Aid Projects)
l
lSUSTAINABILITY: Longer-term financial support to WCPT Commission uncertain. OFM Project does not take a long-term, strategic approach to Commission, esp smaller countries. (Need for long-term strategic approaches)‏