|
Title |
Contact |
Project life |
Budget |
Description | |||||
|
Conservation of Wetland Biodiversity in the Lower Volga Region Project |
GEF/UNDP Russia |
In PDF B. 2002 |
$ 430,220 for PDF B. No figure for full project |
Just starting PDF-B phase; to conserve region's wetland and provide for their sustainable use through strengthened planning and management capacity; improved adaptive local and regional water management practices; strengthened legal and regulatory base and enforcement capacity; development of alternative livelihood demonstration projects ; improved awareness and establishment of a sustainable financing mechanism. | |||||
|
Kazakhstan Wetlands Conservation with the Ural River Component Project |
GEF/UNDP Kazakhstan |
2002-2009 |
$8.7 million for full project |
To conserve selected wetlands including Ural river component . PDF-B complete; Project Brief under consideration | |||||
|
Conservation of Iranian Wetlands Project |
GEF/UNDP Iran |
In PDFB. 2002 |
Full project around $ 6/7 m |
PDF-B nearing completion, Project Brief expected by end 2002. Aims at conservation and wise use of selected wetlands including Caspian connected Miankale. | |||||
|
Tacis Phase III CEP Project |
Tacis/Brussels |
Mid-2003 to 2005 |
4 million EUR |
||||||
|
TACIS Joint River Management Programme--TACIS |
Early spring 2001 (2 years) |
1 mln EUR (4 m EUR for all four basins) |
Overall objective is to support the prevention, control and reduction of adverse transboundary pollution impact caused by the quality of the four rivers selected for the project. The results will be used to recommend modifications to the UN/ECE Guidelines for monitoring and assessment of transboundary waters. | ||||||
|
Regional Environment Center (EU-TACIS, USEPA) |
Nato Kirvalidze, tel/fax 966-956, 877-418-171; rec@caucasus.net |
Chartered 1999 |
Emphasis on capacity building and the development of regional environmental cooperation. Objectives include increasing information exchange between NGOs, governments, the scientific community and the private sector, developing compatible environmental policy and strategies among countries, and raising awareness about the environment. Includes a grants program. | ||||||
|
Yakhkesh Mountain Conservation |
GEF/UNDP Iran |
In PDF A. 2002 |
Full project $ 650,000 |
PDF A near completion. Project Brief expected by end 2002. Aims at safeguarding Yakhkesh Mountain ecosystem In the Caspian Province of Mazandaran | |||||
|
Community based Conservation of Traditional Waterfowl Trapping practices including Siberian Crane |
GEF Small Grant Programme/UNDP Iran |
Under implementation |
$90,000 |
NGO executed project in Mazandaran to protect Siberian Crane | |||||
|
Prevention of Transboundary Degradation in Kura-Araz River Basin |
GEF/UNDP Azerbaijan |
PDF B in pipeline |
$ 696,000 for PDF B. No figure available for the full project |
Full project will aim at improvement in the quality of water and in water managements mechanism to meet the short and long terms needs of the ecosystem and to improve quality of water inflow to the Caspian . | |||||
|
Integrated Environmental Management in the Volga -Caspian Region |
UNEP/CIP Russia |
2002 |
No figure available |
Project aims at development of a legal instrument s for protection of the Caspian Sea and for improvement in the aquatic ecosystem management | |||||
|
TEAP—TACIS Environmental Awareness Project |
completed |
||||||||
|
GEF supported Enabling Projects in all five countries to develop Biodiversity Protection Strategies |
GEF/CBD Convention Secretariat |
Various stages |
Close to & 1.5 million for all five |
Projects assist the littoral countries to prepared National Biodiversity Reports and the National Biodiversity Protection Strategies. | |||||
|
Caspian Environmental NGO Network USAID |
USAID |
1998-ongoing |
Promotion of the regional environmental collaboration in the Caspian area by information exchange (monthly bulletin “Caspian Environmental News”) and regional workshops on environmental topics. | ||||||
|
Water Management in the South Caucasus .Phase II |
USAID/DAI |
2003 |
No figure available |
Phase I concluded in April 2001. Present phase aims at implementing activities pertaining to the management of transboundary water resources in the Kura- Araz River Basin | |||||
|
Cooperative River Monitoring among Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and the US—NATO Science for Peace Programme |
National Academy of Sciences (Armenia), Tbilisi State University (Georgia), and Azerecolab (Azerbaijan) |
3 year project; June 2001 |
Pre-proposal has been submitted to NATO. Purpose of demonstration project will establish approximately 90 monitoring stations for collection of limited data above and below major cities and farming, mining and industrial areas on the Kura and Araks Rivers and their major tributaries. This system will be developed cooperatively with scientists from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and the US, and with additional funding from the US DOE. | ||||||
|
IMP and IS |
WMO |
$ 6 million |
Improved hydrological data collection monitoring in the Caspian littoral countries |
||||||
|
Azerbaijan Urgent Environmental Investment Portfolio |
World Bank |
$ 20 million |
Strengthening environmental management ; soil clean up in selected areas and hatchery construction |
||||||
Italicized descriptions indicate that projects are in the conceptualization stage.
ANNEX 3: Brief Summary of the Caspian Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis
The Caspian Sea Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis was produced based on outputs from the various CEP programme elements, including outputs from the Caspian Regional Thematic Centres, various special studies conducted by the CEP, from four regional workshops on the TDA, and from other available literature (such as private sector reports). The TDA process identified six major perceived problems and issues (MPPI), and two emerging ones. The existing MMPI included:
Decline in certain commercial fish stocks, including sturgeon
Degradation of coastal landscapes/damage to coastal habitats
Threats to biodiversity
Overall decline in environmental quality
Decline in human health
Damage to coastal infrastructure and amenities
The two emerging issues were:
Introduced species
Contamination from offshore oil and gas activities
During the conduct of the TDA, the Introduced Species emerging issue became more urgent as Mnemiopsis was observed in the Caspian Sea, as was predicted by early studies in 1994.
The TDA then performed causal chain analysis of the MPPI. Due to sparseness of data for several of the MPPI, the causal chain was more descriptive in many cases than quantitative. However, the causal chain analysis demonstrated that the various MPPI have common root causes that can be addressed by targeted interventions in the SAP. These root causes included general issues such as lack of policy basis for many environmental issues, lack of appropriate legal basis in some instances, lack of enforcement of existing laws/regulations in many cases, lack of adoption of important international environmental conventions, weak civil society (poor stakeholder participation, education, training), lack of political will to address environmental issues, and disagreements over legal status of the Caspian.
As part of the conduct of various studies and workshops, long lists of interventions were produced, with little structure to hold them together. Instead of an action programme consisting of interventions, the CEP had a laundry list. To provide some structure to these lists, the TDA took the step of determining over-arching policy-level Environmental Quality Objectives that would serve as prioritizing tools for the list of interventions. These EQOs focused on transboundary issues. Each EQO had a series of targets assigned to it. Each target was focused, had a 5-10 year time frame assigned to it, and had a defined process indicator. However, targets are results, and so each target was populated with a series of well-defined interventions that would be necessary to achieve these targets (and hence the EQOs, on a longer time frame). Interventions included identification of national and transboundary character, type of intervention (for convenience, interventions were classified as policy/legal, capacity building, institutional strengthening, scientific investigation, data management, investment, etc.). Each intervention was also costed.
The five agreed EQOs were:
Sustainable economic uses of the natural resources of the Caspian Sea
Balanced Caspian Environment including biodiversity conservation
High quality of Caspian Sea, surface, and ground waters
Sustainable multiple use of the Caspian Coastal Environment
Strengthened civil society for purposes of environmentally sustainable development
The TDA also included a detailed Stakeholder Analysis. This analysis was a critical component of the TDA process, as it not only identified the major stakeholders and their interests for each MPPI and each root cause, but it also identified potential stakeholder conflicts that may arise when the MPPI are addressed. By identifying conflicts early, the Stakeholder Analysis allowed the CEP to craft interventions that would have the greatest potential for being able to be implemented, rather than simply blocked due to strong stakeholder interests.
The output from the TDA then consisted of an improved understanding of the major transboundary issues, which can be summarized as:
Loss of biodiversity
Pollution by POPs (particularly chlororganic pesticides) and some heavy metals
Introduced species
Decline in fisheries
The TDA produced a Preliminary SAP, which was organized along the lines of EQO/ target/ intervention. This Preliminary SAP is taken as the technical expert basis for preparation of NCAPs, and ultimately the SAP.
ANNEX 4: Structure and Components of NCAPs/SAP
Strategic Action Programme (SAP)
The Strategic Action Programme will include a set of actions ---legal, policy and institutional reforms, and investments --- agreed to and committed to by the littoral states to address the priority transboundary problems of the Caspian Sea in an effort to protect the Caspian environment and manage its bioresources in a sustainable manner.
The SAP will draw on two main sources: the Caspian Sea Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis and the National Caspian Actions Plans. The SAP is being produced through a fully participatory consultative mechanism which will include two regional meetings tentatively planned for May and September 2002, building on previous meetings during which the SAP was discussed.
The main components of the SAP will be :
Part 1: Principles, policy direction and implementation mechanisms
Part 2: Summary of agreed priority environmental threats
Part 3: Environmental Quality Objectives and targets
Part 4: Agreed regional interventions to be undertaken in the first five year period
Interventions
Responsiblities of the parties
Support mobilization strategy
Monitoring and evaluation
Part 5: Proposed interventions to be undertaken in second five year period or accelerated as resources allow.
Interventions
Responsiblities of the parties
Support mobilization strategy
Monitoring and evaluation
Provisional SAP Structure and Components
|
EQO |
Targets |
Interventions |
Estimated Costin U.S. $ |
Type of Intervention |
Indicators | |
|
I- Sustainable economic uses of the natural resources of the Caspian Sea |
1- To reduce the oil & gas related pollution of the Caspian |
-Development and endorsement of Protocols on higher environmental standards including minimum emission standards for both onshore and offshore exploitation and exploration activities, new licenses and PSAs by 2003 -Development and endorsement of Protocols on reduction of oil emissions from old installations to half of current value within 10 years -Development and endorsement of national and regional oil pollution emergency plans for ships and offshore units as well as for sea ports and oil handling facilities, including: |
$ 500 K |
Legislative / Regulatory at regional and national levels |
||
|
-improvement and/or de-commissioning of obsolete non-competitive on shore and offshore installations including storage facilities to ensuring elimination of their emissions -oil contaminated oil cleansing projects -protection of oil /chemical facilities under potential threat of inundation - investment towards implementation of national and regional oil emergency plans |
$ 10s millions |
Investment mostly at national level |
||||
|
-development of monitoring and early warning system for water level rise or surges to protect facilities and installations - human resource development activities to enable region effectively implement and enforce related regional protocols |
$ 1 million $ 500k |
Institutional Strengthening/capacity building at both regional and national levels |
||||
|
2- To ensure safe transportation for hydrocarbons and other raw materials |
-development and endorsement/ accession to protocols pertaining to tanker fleet and all other shipping safety -regional agreement on minimum standards for construction and maintenance, and national licensing mechanisms for undersea pipelines |
$ 200k |
Legislative / Regulatory at regional level |
|||
|
- establishing of a coordinated safe system of navigation and shipping control (navigation aids, buoys, lighthouses, etc.) |
None available |
Investment both at regional and national levels |
||||
|
- risk assessments studies on means of transport |
$ 1 million |
Scientific investigation |
||||
|
3- To abate the impact of agriculture on ecosystems of the Caspian Sea |
-development and endorsement of agreement on a list of banned agrochemicals and a program to destroy stored banned products -delimitation of constrained chemical coastal zone around the Caspian Sea within which special limits are established for use of agrochemicals - regional agreement on extraction of river water and control of river flow |
$ 200k |
Legislative / Regulatory |
|||
|
4- To ensure sustainable use of aquatic resources , with emphasis on fisheries |
-Establish a five-country Commission on the management of bioresources that should include as priorities the establishment of a common Caspian-wide scientific network for all shared (migratory) bioresources and ecological problems; an agreed methodology for distributing the total allowable catch between five countries as annual catch and export quotas; an interstate Caspian Fisheries Inspectorate to verify fisheries and restocking, reporting to Commission (composition: one member of each Caspian State + international observer); and uniform methodology for pollution monitoring and its effect on aquatic organisms. |
None available |
Legislative / Regulatory at the regional level |
Aagreement by June 2002 (deadline set by CITES parties) | ||
|
-strengthen and establish a formal system for co-ordination between national fisheries protection organizations to provide adequate compensation to the enforcement officers for their work and to provide equipment to efficiently fight poaching. |
$ 10s millions |
Institutional Strengthening at regional and national levels |
||||
|
-identify, protect and manage natural spawning grounds and improve their accessibility through research, public awareness and improved management -Develop adapted environmentally sound fish farming projects -Purchase a Caspian Sea international research vessel for joint assessment of fisheries and biodiversity resources, hydro-biology as well as pollution. |
$ 10 millions |
Investment At national levels |
||||
|
- Undertake research on the importance of kilka in the food chain of Caspian aquatic species in order to establish multi-species based catch quotas. -Study genetic variability at population level, particularly for sturgeon and establish a gene-bank conservation laboratory |
$ 300k |
Scientific investigation at regional and national levels |
||||
|
5- To ensure sustainable use of rivers and freshwater |
- Manage water release from hydro-electric dams in accordance with natural needs, particularly seasonal anadromous fish migration. |
$ 100k |
Institutional Strengthening & Legislative / Regulatory at national and regional levels |
|||
|
- Manage water intake for agriculture and other uses (e.g. industry and urban consumption) in order to maintain river water level and prevent detrimental impact on the ecosystem, e.g. planktonic production and fish migration behaviour. |
$ 100k |
Institutional Strengthening & Legislative / Regulatory |
||||
|
- Use of economic instruments to rationalize water supply systems, including metering equipment and review of pricing system, for agricultural, industrial and domestic use |
$200 million in each country |
investment |
||||
|
II- Conservation of Caspian Biodiversity |
1- Development and implementation of a strategy for the protection of Caspian biodiversity |
Policy |
Strategy developed by 2002 and implementation by 2005 | |||
|
-. Implement Biodiversity Strategy, including specie(s) specific action plans |
$1,000,000 |
Institutional Strengthening |
||||
|
-Draft and acceptance of a biodiversity protocol to the framework convention |
$100k |
Legislative / Regulatory |
||||
|
- Development of guidelines on economic evaluation/compensation for loss of biodiversity by 2005 |
$50k |
Scientific Investigation |
||||
|
2- Establish a network of designated areas around the Caspian and coastal |
- Regular regional meetings of protected areas managers to enhance coordination, discuss common issues, create Website and to arrange for the training including eco tourism training |
$ 400k |
Institutional Strengthening |
Network established by by 2005 | ||
|
3- prevention of adverse human activity on sensitive areas |
-. Evaluate sensitivity of areas and habitats in the Caspian region including anthropogenic and natural factors impact; develop sensitive areas action plans and maps and make recommendations for location and level and of legislative protection required. |
$ 500k |
Institution strengthening |
|||
|
-Make recommendations for adoption of E Spoo Convention and regional EIA procedures to strengthen national legislation |
$50k |
Legal/regulatory |
||||
|
4- A biodiversity monitoring system based on a set of regional monitoring protocols |
-Develop a set of monitoring protocols for the Caspian and develop and implement biodiversity monitoring national programs in the coastal waters and areas of each riparian country -Create Caspian Biodiversity Data Base inclusive of a complete check-list of species, specific Caspian identification, and a reference collection in the regional biodiversity centers -Develop specific biodiversity monitoring and conservation programme for endangerous species (see target 1) -. Establish a bio-molecular laboratory as part of the Regional Biodiversity Center to investigate genetic biodiversity - Organize two cruises to assess the biodiversity of the deep part of the middle and southern sectors of the Caspian Sea - Develop public monitoring programmes for the flagship species (Caspian seal, Mnemiopsis leidyi) |
$ 2 Millions $ 400k $ 1 Million $ 2 Million $ 300 k $ 100k |
Institutional Strengthening/ Scientific Investigation |
|||
|
5- Increase public awareness of the value of the Caspian Sea biodiversity |
- Dissemination of information on biodiversity in the Caspian; promotion of eco-tourism and sensitization of decision makers to biological diversity protection to be linked to overall public awareness campaign (see EQO V) |
$200k |
Institutional Strengthening |
|||
|
6. Establish inter-governmental mechanisms for rapid response to non-oil emergency events affecting Caspian biodiversity (mass mortality events, etc.) 2005 |
-. Identify in each country a responsible body or person for rapid response on the Governmental level; establish lists of rapid response regional experts; create and fund rapid response activities and a governing body for its management |
$ 400k |
Institutional Strengthening |
|||
|
- develop and adopt intergovernmental agreement on rapid communication, data access and sampling including Aarhus |
$ 100k |
Legal/regulatory |
||||
|
7- Establish control system for the import and export of exotic species into and from the Caspian Sea |
Develop protocol to the framework convention on control of introduced new species |
$100 |
Investment |
|||
|
Construct a ballast reception and inspection facility in Astrakhan |
$1 o Million |
|||||
|
- As part of the Invasive species action plan implement special studies and monitoring program for invasive species in the frame work of biodiversity monitoring - Establish a regional inter-governmental body to review planned introduction of new species |
$500k |
Institutional Strengthening / Scientific investigation |
||||
|
- In conjunction with Globalast update maritime legislation to reduce cost of control of invasive species |
$100 |
Legislative / Regulatory |
||||
|
III- High quality of Caspian Sea, surface and groundwaters |
1- Regionally agreed water quality objectives and recommended standards |
- Develop protocol to the Framework Convention on in connection with land-based activities -Develop and obtain regional agreement on EQOs/EQSs for river water, sediment, and biotaquality improvement in the Caspian Sea -Develop regional standards for the outfalls that directly discharge to the Caspian Sea -Develop regionally agreed guidelines both for compliance and ambient monitoring programmes, including design, in-situ measurements, sampling, sample handling, analysis, quality control/quality assurance, and reporting |
$ 300 k |
Legislative / Regulatory & Scientific Investigation |
Protocol by 2003 Agreed EQOs/EQSs by 2003 | |
|
-Regional reviews of solid waste disposal, sewage collection and treatment and waste water systems in particular in those areas having transboundary problems to identify of appropriate technology for disposal and management in the region, and implement pilot projects. |
$ 400k |
Scientific Investigation |
Review completed by 2004 | |||
|
2- Regionally coordinated compliance and ambient monitoring program for trends in place |
- Prepare and implement an Environmental Rapid Assessment Programme in the Caspian Sea using biomarkers - Prepare and implement a programme for determination and management of land-based point and non-point pollutant sources -prepare and implement programme for groundwater quality compliance - Establish new coastal laboratories or improve existing coastal laboratories responsible for monitoring in the littoral states -Develop and implement project investigating the distribution and fate of contaminant using isotopic and nuclear techniques by 2004 -Planning and conducting basin wide cruise (one in first 2years) investigating on major oceanographic and contaminant status of the Caspian Sea By 2004 |
$ 1 Million |
Institutional Strengthening |
Programmes in place by 2008 | ||
|
3- Regionally agreed Plan of Action for land-based activities to meet water quality objectives |
-Develop and establish national/regional land-based activities data and information management system as a tool for contaminant assessment and management -Conduct a study on training needs, capacity building, and institutional strengthening in the environmental organizations and industries -Develop Environmental data and Information Data base for the free and regular exchange of same within the region |
$250K $500k |
Institutional Strengthening |
A regional Plan by 2005 | ||
|
IV- Sustainable multiple use of the Caspian coastal environment |
1- Improved Coastal Spatial Planning |
-In line with Regionally agreed Planning Guidelines develop /revise and nationally adopt national legislation on coastal zone planning and management. -Development of regionally agreed EIA guiding principles as Protocol to the Framework Convention .- Review and propose revisions for national legislation on protected areas to establish objectives for minimizing coastal degradation in sensitive areas and to permit environmentally friendly wise uses of the protected areas including eco-tourism activities |
$500k |
Legislative/ Regulatory |
||
|
-Develop Data base for environmental, socio-economic, sea- and land-use, and related information and produce GIS maps of same -Develop and implement comprehensive national Caspian spatial plans for major human settlements to minimize environmental impacts, improve future citing of industrial areas, agricultural and urban development - Develop proposal for establishment of the Standing Committee on coastal zone planning and management |
$ 200k for data base, $ 1 million for each Caspian Spatial Plan |
Institutional strengthening |
||||
|
2- A “green” belt for coastal eco-tourism will be established around the entire Caspian Sea |
-Commission an independent feasibility study of the “green” belt concept; establish a regional “green” belt working group to review national coastal eco-tourism proposals and recommend alternatives, develop a management framework, and identify regional financial mechanisms -Each country will propose locations for eco-tourism centers; attract required investment through various means; start establishment of the green belt through development of eco tourism pilot projects on the Caspian coast to include activities aimed at attracting regional and international visitors e.g. aquatic parks |
$1.175 million |
Institutional Strengthening |
Green belt established by 2007 | ||
|
3. Improved inundation and surge coastal preparedness |
-Develop programme for regionally coordinated collection and analysis of oceanographic information including information on climate and hydrology. -Develop Protocols on exchange of oceanographic information |
$75k |
Legal/regulatory |
Protocols in place by 2004 | ||
|
-Develop and demonstrate mitigation measures to reduce negative impacts of natural hazards including water level fluctuation, storms, surges, and earthquakes human and natural habitats and infrastructure of the coastal zone |
$ millions |
Investment |
||||
|
- Establish a regional working group, including private and public sectors, to provide recommendations on coastal planning zones |
$ 50k |
Institutional Strengthening |
||||
|
4 – Improved land degradation control |
- review and assess regional trends of land degradation including deforestation, review root causes including social, economic factors and develop community based land degradation control programmes in coastal areas |
$ 200k |
Institutional Strengthening |
Reduce rate of loss of land due to technogenic desertification by 10% by year 2007 | ||
|
-develop and implement land degradation control, and floods management pilot projects in coastal areas - design and implement river basin and watershed management programmes |
$ millions |
investment |
||||
|
- Establish legislation to reduce rate of deforestation, based on economic incentives and disincentives littoral countries |
$ 100k |
Legislative / Regulatory & |
||||
|
V- Civil society oriented Environmental Sustainable Development |
1- integration of environmental considerations in local, national and regional development strategies |
- Creation and implementation of environmental awareness training program for policy makers, planners, and development project managers to be administered to regional and municipal governments throughout the region. To begin implementation by 2004 |
$500 k |
Institutional strengthening |
Implementation to start by 2004 | |
|
2 - enhanced and informed stakeholders participation in the development process |
- development and national adoption of legislation to require broader civil society, including Stakeholder Participation |
$500k |
Legislative/ Regulatory |
|||
|
Strengthening national NGOs and civil society movements focusing on environmental awareness and sustainable development components of developmental processes by 2003 --Community driven development: Empower local authorities including collaboration among cities and local scale activities -Enhance participation of media (in particular regarding environmental issue reporting) by 2002 Public-private partnerships for environmental monitoring and public awareness |
$500k $500k $500k |
Institutional strengthening |
||||
|
-Pilot Small Matched and Micro Grant projects on Caspian private/public sector coordination to increase environmental monitoring and development in region by 2005 |
$ 1 Million |
Investment |
||||
|
3- Enhanced environmental skills and knowledge |
-Develop Caspian-conscious school Curricula -identification of environmental training needs in the Caspian region and development of a training and re-skilling programmed -Student exchange programme across the Sea |
$ 200K |
Institutional strengthening |
|||
|
-creation of Caspian Environment Education and Training Centre |
$ 1 Million |
Investment |
||||
|
4. Improved human health conditions |
-develop and adopt national standards for recreational and underground waters |
$ 200k |
Legal /regulatory |
|||
|
-develop and implement programmes to ensure compliance with standards - assess human health conditions in Caspian coastal areas and compile a Caspian Health Atlas |
$ 1 Million |
Institutional strengthening |
||||
NCAP SUGGESTED SCOPE AND CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.1 Purpose of the NCAP
1.2 Relationship of the NCAP to TDA and SAP
1.3 Relationship of the NCAP to Integrated Coastal Area Management Plans
1.4 Methodology used for developing the NCAP
1.5 National Status of the NCAP
1.6 Process for review and updating of the NCAP
2.1 National political and institutional framework
2.2 National economic setting
2.3 National socio-economic situation
2.4 Prospects and trends for the next ten years
3.1 The wider Caspian catchment basin
3.2 The Caspian area of immediate influence
3.3 Future prospects for Caspian significance
4.1 Major existing and emerging transboundary problems and issues
4.2 Major existing and emerging National problems and issues
4.3 Immediate and root causes for these problems and issues
5.1 Criteria for ranking root causes and for prioritisation of strategies and actions
5.2 Long-term strategies to address the priority root causes
5.3 Immediate actions to address the priority root causes
5.4 Resources required to address the priority root causes
6.1 Policy and institutional barriers
6.2 Social, cultural and economic barriers
6.3 Inadequate human capacity
6.4 Financial barriers
7.1 National resources
7.2 External resources
8.1 Organizational structure for implementation of NCAP
8.2 Schedules, targets and progress indicators
8.3 Public accountability
References
Annexes
ANNEX 5: Summary of International Environmental Agreements Signed
By Caspian Littoral States
|
Azerbaijan |
I.R. Iran |
Russia |
Kazakhstan |
Turkmenistan | |
|
Climate Change |
y |
y |
y |
y |
y |
|
Kyoto Protocol |
y |
y | |||
|
Desertification Control |
y |
y |
y |
y | |
|
Prior Informed Consent |
|||||
|
Vienna Convention |
y |
y |
y |
y |
y |
|
Montreal Protocol |
y |
y |
y |
y |
y |
|
Basel Convention |
y |
y |
y |
y | |
|
Bonn Amendment |
|||||
|
Biological Diversity |
y |
y |
y |
y |
y |
|
Biosafety Protocol |
y |
y |
y |
y |
y |
|
CITES |
y |
y |
y |
y |
y |
|
Agreement related to Conservation of Highly Migratory Species |
y |
y |
|||
|
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands |
y |
y |
y |
||
|
World Heritage Convention |
y |
y |
y |
y |
y |
|
Conservation of Migratory Species |
|||||
|
EIA in a Transboundary Context ( Espoo) |
y |
signed |
y |
||
|
Convention on Access to Information (Aarhus) |
y |
y |
y |