|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Project: 1996 - Integrated Ecosystem Management in the Prespa Lakes Basin of Albania, FYR-Macedonia and Greece |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Progress toward achieving project objectives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
Description of Indicator |
Baseline Level[4] |
Target Level at end of project |
Level at 30 June 2008 |
Level at 30 June 2009 |
|
Objective: |
Objective:
To catalyse the adoption of integrated ecosystem management (IEM) in the trans-boundary Prespa Lakes Basin of FYR Macedonia, Albania, and Greece to conserve globally significant biodiversity, mitigate pollution of the trans- boundary lakes, and provide a sustainable basis for the Basin’s further social and economic development |
Demonstration of
IEM approach
|
None |
At least 5
visible demonstrations in AL, MK and GR* in key sectors related directly to conservation of significant biodiversity and trans-boundary waters
|
6 SGP pilot
actions + several site management and ecosystem oriented studies (Al) |
Pilot study for integrated monitoring system underway; the pilot phase to be initiated in October 2009. (TBC)
Forest Management Plan for one forest management unit in MK Prespa finalized and enacted.
Some demonstrations awaiting adoption of key plans – e.g. watershed management plan. Small areas of demonstration apple farming in existence. Excellent demonstration small wastewater treatment plant (construction finalized; awaiting for Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning to finalize the wastewater collection system) (MK)
|
|
|
|
Financial resources for IEM approach made available
|
Not available from public funds Not trained |
US$2 million for IEM by end of project Key local stakeholders trained |
41,293 USD spent on site through small grants to local NGOs (AL) |
662,638 USD are disbursed (consultancies, trainings, awareness, actions, equipment, monitoring, etc.) (AL) |
|
|
|
|
0 |
Key local stakeholders trained |
14 representatives of Park Administration
and forestry service
3 representatives of Local Authorities
24 representatives of NGOs incl.
OFM (Al)
4 participants from Prespa attended training in Vilm, Germany on Integrated Water Resources Management (TB)
4 participants from
MK and AL Prespa trained on stakeholder participation in Integrated Water Resources Management (TB)
Trilateral Prespa Park Coordination Committee (PPCC) members trained on key
issues pertaining to functioning of a basin commission. (TB)
Preparations completed for a joint training workshop (Jul 08) with GEF-IW LEARN where stakeholders will be trained on Preparation of Lake Basin Management Plans, EU Water Framework Directive and the
PaEgeco7soyf s5t1em
Approach (TB) |
3 project staff trained in International courses (on watershed management, Metadata and GeoNetwork), 27 farmes from Korca under periodic training on agro-meteorological data and information. In cooperation with REC, the teachers of both communes are trained for the environmental issues and 'Green Pack' (AL)
13 participants from Albania and Macedonia are training on Preparation of Lake Basin Management Plans, EU Water Framework Directover and the Integrated River Basin Management Approach at the workshop "Integrated Management of Shared Lakes Basins" (TB)
Training of 25 farmers on GAP (Good Agricultural Practices) was finalized in the reporting period in one cycle, second cycle (for a new group of 25 farmers) launched. (MK)
2 municipal personnel responsible for isdsuing of permitsin the Municipality of Resen trained on principles and procedures on integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) and EIA (Environment Impact Assessment). The same training was delivered to a bigger group of representatives from the industry sector, and to municipal personnel from neighboring municipalities (MK)
Capacity building excercise on ecosytem oriented spatial/land-use planning for the representatives from Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning (Spatial Planning Sector), Agency for Spatial Planning, Municipality of Resen (MK)
|
|
|
|
Management tools for
IEM approach
|
Not defined |
Incentives,
information, communication provided |
Prespa newspaper
TV and media coverage Reports and
studies available in the UNDP website Copybook for pupils
Thematic mapping Books and MDGs leaflets (Al)
Information material on linkages of ecosystem services to human well being prepared and made available.
Test version of Prespa website launched.
|
LEAP recommendations are being implemented in close cooperation with the local authorities. A brochure/manual: ‘how to/best practice‘, with focus on watershed management experiences is under publication. Trade show on agro-businesses organised in September 2008 followed with participation of farmers in apple festival in MK. Terms of Reference for hiring an experienced NGO to commit with capacity building and knowledge management activities and relevant training on IEM are developed and announced. The process for small scaled actions is launched. ToRs for consultancy on spatial planning as an alternative planning tool in Prespa area are under preparation. METT assessment done on January - February 2009 (AL)
TDA-SAP process initiated and underway; Training on IEM/ IWRM conducted; Tri-lateral Spatial Planning discussions held; States committed human resources for participating in the TB Monitoring System development and TB Water Mgt; National components mobilised co-financing for IEM. (TB)
Watershed managemnt ToR developed and advertised in the reporting period. Forest management plan for one unit of the public local enterprise developed. Incentives through reduced production costs; organic certification scheme nearing completion. (MK)
|
|
Outcome 1: |
Outcome 1: Stakeholders strengthen legal and regulatory enabling environment and establish land and water use management basis for maintaining and restoring ecosystem health in the Prespa lakes |
Main sectoral laws
incorporate ecosystem health objectives/priorities
; strengthened regulations for water, spatial planning and environmental management at local level. |
Water, Ag,
Forest, Fishery Law do not prioritize ecosystem health |
In-stream flows
for fish become priority use of water;
Ag/pesticide certification criteria strengthened for aquatic ecosystem health;
Forest law incorporates maximizing ecosystem services as priority objective;
Regulations for local water use management, spatial plan enforcement and environmental management
adopted by EoY
3. |
Action plan for
ecosystem oriented forest management prepared and will be incorporated in the forest management plan for one forest unit in MK Prespa
(MK)
Regulations to follow the endorsement of the new Law on
Waters and the new spatial plan for Prespa (MK)
4 sectorial reports are produced incorporating ecosystem health priorities into Water, Agriculture,
Forest, and Fishery
Laws (AL) |
Coordinating with MoEFWA on new water law (AL)
Ecosystem oriented forest mangement plan developed and enacted (MK)
The newly adopted legislation in the country provides strong framework for incorporation of ecosystem priorities into various sectoral policy and other documents. Govt. adopted new Law on Plant Protection harmonised with EU aquis in late 2007. New Forest Law in final stages of Parliamentary approval. Watershed management plan for Prespa Basin will be pioneering regulations including in-stream flows which will act as model for others nationwide.(MK) |
|
|
|
Replication:
Watershed planning manual adopted as official manual by MoEPP and MoEFWM for rest of country |
No manual;
replication not facilitated. |
Manual
integrated into watershed planning nationwide by EoY 4. |
N/A for the
reporting period
In MKD the new Law on Waters is expected to be adopted by the end of 2008 which will create an enabling environment for implementation of this activity.
A best practice manual on Lake Ecosystem management referring to best community living methods is under development as a mean to follow up with environmental planning and strengthening of regulatory enabling environment. |
The publication of the Best Practice manual is in the proces. This publication is shared with environmental plannners to enable and enforce regulatory environment (AL)
Production of Watershed Manual is in the process, finalization of the manual is expected by the end of 2010. The Ministry of Envrionment agreed Prespa Watershed Management Plan to act as pilot and model for replication nationwide once completed. (MK) |
|
|
|
Spatial plan (MK, GR)/LEAP (AL) incorporate ecosystem management objectives in detail |
No LEAP in place;
Spatial plan
in MK ad GR
under way |
Spatial plans completed in MK ad GR by EoY 2 and approved by EoY3 |
Draft spatial plan for the Prespa- Ohrid region completed with financial contribution from the Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, and submitted for approval to the Parliament.
Development of new ecosystem oriented methodology for spatial planning and development of a new local (more detailed) plan only for the Municipality of Resen (which includes the whole MK Prespa Watershed) initiated (MK)
LEAPs for Liqenas and Proger communes are finalized and approved by the respective authorities. Follow up with the main findings is actually running in close link and cooperation with local planning authority and Ministry of Environment, Forestry, Water
and Agriculture (MoEFWA). Cooperation (AL)
|
Follow up with the main findings of LEAPs is actually running in close link and cooperation with local planning authority and MoEFWA. Concrete actions have been undertaken. The sewage water channel has been repared/constrated in Proger and equipment have been purchased in Liqenas. The teachers of both communes are trained for the environmental issues and 'Green Pack' (AL)
Spatial plan for Ohrid - Prespa region is in final stages of Parliamentary approval (MK) |
|
|
|
Strengthened local
management of important riparian habitat of both lakes in AL, MK and
GR*. |
No
conservatio n or managemen t of shoreline habitat in AL and
MK;
Active conservatio n managemen t of wetland habitats in Lake Micro Prespa, GR*. |
Approved
protected area managements plans in the 3 countries and definition of institutions for their implementatio n by EoY 3;
Other important riparian habitat to be defined by EoY2 and
50% of these areas managed well by EoY 4 (MK+AL).
100 ha of wet meadows in GR* by EoY
4. |
Development of
the management plan for the “Ezerani” protected area along with institutional and organizational set up for future management is underway |
Further national capacity building, knowledge management on biodiversiy conservation and monitoring activities are planned for the second half of 2009. Terms of Reference for hiring an experienced NGO to commit with capacity building and knowledge management activities and relevant training on IEM are developed and announced. (AL)
Study on re-assessment of natural values of 'Ezerani' protected area is in its final stages of preparation (to be completed by early autumn 2009). The Study will provide the basis for defining the management arrangements and preparation of the management plan for the protected area (MK). |
|
|
|
Three priority
streams (Ag. Germanos, Brajcino
& Krani) and 1 tributary of Golema River (Leva stream) maintain environmental in- stream flow and
water quality as
appropriate for endemic trout (MK- GR*). |
Currently,
lower parts of these rivers may run dry
in summer months and water quality is reduced by agricultural run-off and waste water |
Environmental
flow requirements established by EoY 3.
Environmental flows maintained by end EoY5.
Water quality improved through reduced of agrochemicals use by EoY3
Application of small-scale waste water treatment by EoY4
Species action plan endorsed and implemented by EoY 2 |
N/A for the
reporting period
Increased number of farmers follow the principles of integrated crop management as a result of trainings provided by the project, as well as equipment purchased by projects that are complementary to the Prespa project (MK)
Technical documentation for construction of small-scale waste water treatment in the village
Nakolec finalized. Tender procedure for selection of contractor underway (MK) |
N/A (AL)
New Law on Waters (2008) greatly delayed (expected in 2005) because of institutional responsibility issues between the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy and Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning. Could not move forwards until legal basis established. Environmental flow requirements will be part of the Watershed Management Plan for Prespa (expected start of watershed management plan in September 2009). (MK)
Wastewater Treatment Plant in Nakolec (type: natural system - constructed wetland) completed. Start of operation awaiting the complection of the wastewater collection system which is supported by the Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning and the local community (MK)
Training on GAP for 25 farmers successfully completed. A new group of 25 interested farmers identified undergoing the same training programme. (MK)
|
|
|
|
Water management in
the Prespa basin is aligned between the 3 littoral countries, considers ecosystem health needs and follows the principles of integrated basin water management |
No
assessment of current water uses; good ecological status not considered;
no basin specific water management plans; no trilateral coordination mechanism |
Establishment
of the trilateral Working Group on Water Management (WGWM) by EoY 2.
Approved and aligned water management plans with targets regarding water quality,
integrated water uses, and ecological
status.
Regulations for local water use management adopted by EoY
4 |
Establishment of
WGWM underway (TOR to be prepared by the trans-boundary component)
Water
management plans to be developed immediately upon endorsement of the new Law on
Waters (MK) |
Assesment report on water management issues in Prespa finalized in December 2008 and updated by April 2009. The process for functioning of WMWG is underlined in ToR (governments will be approached to nominate Water Management Working Group members). (TB)
The process of developing the Prespa Lake Watershed Management Plan addressing all the aspect related to integrated land and water management is expected to start in September 2009 (delays caused by the late approval of the Law on Waters) (MK) |
|
Outcome 2: |
Outcome 2:
Stakeholders modify productive sector resource management practices to reduce pesticide inputs, increase habitat heterogeneity, and
improve the status of target species and communities
in the Prespa Basin. |
# hectares of forest
under improved biodiversity- oriented management in MK, GR*, AL Prespa. |
No ha of
forest under this kind of management |
2,000 ha in
MK by EoY 3.
3,000 ha in AL by EoY 3; and 1,000 ha in GR* by EoY 3. |
Ecosystem forest
management plans in final stages of preparation. Their enforcement to commence upon their approval by the authorities (MK) |
Biodiversity-oriented management of forests are envisaged when the delayed KfW project preparing the management plan for Prespa National Park begins (AL)
The new forest management plan for the forest unit Leva Reka – Bigla prepared in accordance to the guidelines on incorporation of the ecosystem priorities provided by the project is was completed and enacted by the authorities (MK)
|
|
|
|
# of farmers
applying integrated pest management practices in MK and AL.
|
Number of
farmers in MK currently applying Integrated Pest Manageme nt? (To be determined by EOY1)
90 out of a total of 200 farmers in GR* currently applying Integrated Pest Manageme nt |
20 farms by
EoY 2 (5 in AL and 15 in MK);
50 by EoY 4 (10 in AL and
40 in MK) |
20 farmers
participate in comprehensive training programme on integrated crop management (ICM) and are implementing the ICP principles (MK) |
METT assessment has already proposed replacement of this indicator with “# of farmers producing certified organic products in Albania. Recent agricultural expert estimation reports at least 8 family farms apply organic production practices. (AL)
25 farmers trained and applying GAP practices, monitored by the project. Training of new group of 25 started in the second quarter of 2009 (MK)
|
|
|
|
% of wood community forests
(CF) contribute to two communities’ needs for fodder and fuel wood in AL.
|
CF
provides none of the fuel wood and fodder needs. |
CF provides
50% of 2 target villages’ (AL) needs by EoY 4. |
CF - 30% of Park
Forest area provide the actual needs
for fodder and fuel wood in Macro Prespa. (AL) |
idem (AL) |
|
|
|
Allowable fish catch
linked to population size estimates in both lakes in MK, AL and GR*.
|
There is no
limit on fish caught during regular season;
Fishery authorities from the 3 countries are usually deciding jointly a yearly spring “closed period” for fishing since
2004.
|
Improved
collection of fishery data in all three countries by EoY2;
Sharing of data by all three countries by EoY2;
Allowable fish catch is linked to population size estimates and other indices (# of fishing boats, territory of fishing area in each country) for five species by EoY 4;
Regular contacts between fisheries authorities of the three countries to reach common decisions on allowable fishing tools, closed seasons and other sustainable management measures;
Harmonized by- laws on
fisheries amongst the 3 littoral states.
|
Concept on
trilateral fisheries management along with future steps toward its achievement has been defined (TB) |
Process for outlining the trilateral fisheries management underway (TB).
Actual annual catch is 200-250 ton of fish in both Prespa lakes (AL)
Expected to increase following production of Fisheries Plan(s). (AL)
Data collection performed based on best available sources completed by the Hydrobiological Institute (responsible for preparation of the Fisheries Management Plan for MK Prespa) (MK)
Fisheries management plan prepared by the national authorities, takes into account the actual situation of the fish stock particularly with respect to the native and endemic species (major gaps identified as a result of fragmented historical data). The gaps in the understanding of fisheries ecology to be filled in the process of preparation of a trilaterial fisheries management basis. Agreement reached with national authorities on possible revision of the fisheries management plan for MK Prespa to take into account the findings of the gap filling excercise and to consider regional aspects in managing fisheries (MK). |
|
|
|
Change in awareness
among local people regarding the Prespa ecosystem;
|
Baseline to
be established by EoY1.
|
20%
improvement by end of EoY (EoY) 2; 50%
by EoY 4. (To be assessed based on specific methodologies developed)
|
Local media (radio and TV) has run programmes on Prespa area. Improved access to the information centers in
Zagradec and Gorica. Targeted educational programme developed and carried out on
Prespa ecosystem
(Al)
|
Local communication and PA exert is hired to assist on implementation of CEPA. Targeted educational programme is developed and is on progress on Prespa ecosystem (AL)
Baseline on public awareness was established with the Communication, Education and Public Awareness Strategy- CEPA. (TBC)
Continuous efforts aiming at community awareness raising are being made during the implementation of various project activities, but a more systematic approached will be pursued with the beginning of the implementation of the Communication, Education and Public Awareness Strategy (CEPA) prepared by the transboundary component of the project. (MK).
|
|
|
|
Cost savings to
specific farmers from use of fertilizer made from waste apples in MK. |
Costs and
technique to produce fertilizer made from waste apples tbd in first six months. |
Reduced in
participating farms by significant percentage by EoY 3. |
Crop production
costs to be determined based on the monitoring results from the 20 farms currently involved in the programme (available in late autumn 2008) (MK)
|
N/A for AL
The farmers involved in the training programme maintain records on the use of pesticides, fertilizers and water, and the associated costs. The complete results will be presented at the end of the programme. Current estaimates indicate 20-35% reduction in production costs (largely dependent on the microclimate and weather conditions) (MK) |
|
|
|
Decline in sales of
detergents containing phosphorous in Resen municipality.
|
Baseline
TBD in first six months.
|
Decline of 50%
by EoY 3; 75%
by EoY 4.
|
The Law on
Environment forbids use of phosphorus detergents and its strict enforcement already significantly reduced the use of such detergents. (MK)
|
N/A for AL
Indicator irrelevant following countrywide ban on detergents containing phosphorous.(MK). |
|
|
|
Eutrophying inputs
(N, organic material) to Macro Prespa reduced m3 through small-scale wastewater treatment pilots.
|
One
wastewater treatment plant in MK and none in AL. Relevant project underway
in GR* Prespa (Current input to be determined
by EoY1)
|
Two pilots
reduce inputs by
1000 m3 by
EoY 3.
|
Technical
documentation for one WWTP in Nakolec (Constructed wetland) completed and tender procedure for selection of construction company underway (MK)
Constructed wetland facility expected to be established in Gorica/ Liqenas, in cooperation with ArtGold (Al)
|
N/A for AL
The wastewater treatment plant at Nakolec completed in the reporting period. Start of operation awaiting for the completion of the wastewater collection system by the Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning (MK) |
|
|
|
Improved overall
quality of life in villages with small- scale wastewater treatment.
|
Community
survey measures quality of life baseline first
6 months
|
Significant
increase in quality of life measurement from survey of participating local communities.
|
An economic
analysis of the values of the most prominent services of ecosystem in Prespa is ongoing
– revealing the most relevant services that sustain the IEM (AL)
|
A recent study report on socio-economic profile of Prespa area prepared by an international consultant provides indications of the some life quality aspects (AL) |
|
|
|
Reduced costs for
water, pesticide and fertilizer inputs for local farmers in MK, AL and GR*
|
Costs tbd in
first six months
|
Reduced in
monitored farms by significant percentage
(more than 35-
40%) by EoY 3
|
The baseline
assessment for this indicator reveals
720 kilograms annual application of pesticides (cost around 600,000
ALL |
A recent study report on socio-economic profile of Prespa area prepared by an international consultant provides indications of the some life quality aspects (AL)
Current monitoring shows 20-35% but reduction varies according to two key factors – a) the microclimate within Prespa Region which dictates number and amount of pesticide applications; and b) actual weather conditions present in any given year. (MK)
|
|
Outcome 3: |
Outcome 3: Stakeholders conserve priority biological
diversity across the Prespa Basin and make key protected areas in Prespa Basin fully operational
|
# hectares of priority
habitat for birds, fish, rare plants, and mammals under improved conservation management
|
No
managemen t plans; no active managemen t; no
specific # of hectares under special managemen t;
Approved management plan (2001) for wet meadows of Micro Prespa in GR*
which is being revised through SPP LIFE-Nature project GR*.
|
Target number
of hectares under improved management to be determined and implemented based on recommendatio
ns of the species action plans. |
Initial analysis is
underway within the ongoing studies (ENR, forestry etc.). More information
will be provided in the other planned documents (fisheries management plan, spatial plan etc.) (MK)
Suggest to modify target to include habitats as well (TB) |
Pending Species and Habitats Action plan, to commence in July 2009. (TB);
Delays in start_up with KfW project impact this indicator (AL)
Pending Species and Habitats Action plan, to commence in July 2009. (MK)
Study on Ezerani protected area near completion. Work will result in preparation of management plan which will take into account the ecological needs of the key habitats and species within the protected area (MK)
Forest Management Plan finalized and enacted (MK)
Fisheries Management Plan prepared by the Hydrobiological Institute. Possible revisions based on the improved understanding of the key fish species and their habitats and the transboundary fisheries management aspects (MK) |
|
|
|
ENR and PPA-GR*
are/are not gazetted and boundaries are/are not clearly marked on maps or on the ground
|
Not
gazetted; Not clearly marked
|
ENR and PPA-
GR *are gazetted and boundaries are clearly marked on the ground by EoY4. |
Preparations for
gazetting of ENR and marking of the boundaries underway (MK) |
N/A for AL
Reassessment of natural values of Ezerani Strict Nature Reserve underway. Preparation of the supporting documentation for re-gazetting the ENR is underway (key focus of the study on assessing the natural values of the reserve) (MK).
|
|
|
|
Golema Reka River
(MK) restored
|
Degraded
Golema
River in need of solid waste removal, stream
habitat and substrate protection
and reduction of pollution (including pollution
from fish farms near
Krusje springs)
|
Analysis of
situation by EoY 1; Approval of final plans by EoY 2;
Pilot demonstration restoration by EoY3;
|
Comprehensive
analysis of the environmental status of Golema Reka along with actions for its improvement completed. Implementation of some priority measures underway with financial support
of the Swiss Development Agency for Cooperation in the amount of app. 1,6 million $US; additional 1
million $US expected in autumn (MK) |
N/A for AL
Reassessment of natural values of Ezerani Strict Nature Reserve near completion. Preparation of the supporting documentation for re-gazetting the ENR is near completion (MK).
|
|
|
|
Number of species action plans
developed and approved
|
Few species action plans;
Information very good for some species, spotty or lacking for
others
|
Species action plans
developed and agreed in the Prespa basin by EoY 4.
|
Protocols for identification of
priority species completed and action planning process being initiated. (TB)
Action plans development under discussion with the relevant stakeholders (Ministries, Municipality)
(MK)
|
Contract with a company that will development a priority species action plan is signed, activities towards development of species action plans to commence in July 2009. (TB) |
|
|
|
Pilot application of the trans-boundary
monitoring system and assessment of methods, training and capacity needs and analysis/interpretatio
n of data
|
Evaluation of applied
original monitoring system (see above
|
Revised monitoring
system in place and generating useful data by end of EoY 4
|
N/A for the reporting period |
Not applicable for the reporting period. The pilot monitoring study development is underway, to be finalized in November 2009 upon which it will be tested for a period of 12 months starting December 2010. (TB) |
|
|
|
Presence/absence of
up-to-date information on extent/condition of priority species and habitat distribution, abundance, and condition.
|
Information
spotty, dated, and focused on single species
|
Updated data by
EoY 2;
Establishment of reference conditions for selected species by EoY 3.
|
Protocols for
determination of priority trans- boundary species completed. Next step would be determination of spp itself – planned for the second half of
2008 (TB)
108 species of dendroflora are identified and cataloged, and endorsed to the Prespa Park Administration (AL)
|
Not applicable for the reportung period. Dependant of the Species and Habitats action plan whose preparation will be launched in July 2009. (TB) |
|
|
|
Protected Area
Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT) score for PNP, GNP, and ENR, PPA-Greece*.
|
X (TBD at
project inception)
|
X + 20% by
mid term; X +
40% by project end.
|
METT scoring for
PNP 31 (based on assessment carried out at August
2007) (Al)
METT for Ezerani Nature Reserve (ENR) prepared within national protected areas project (MK)
|
METT scoring for PNP according to the second METT assessment report was 34 (feb. 2009) (AL)
Study on assessing the natural values of the Ezerani Nature Reserve (ENR) is underway. It will serve as a basis for the re-gazetting of the protected area and in defining the future management arrangements. METT application is part of the overall process on strengthening the ENR.(MK)
|
|
|
|
The management
authorities of ENR, PNP-AL, GNP and PPA-Greece* are fully equipped and operational to carry out basic management activities |
Staff
numbers are inadequate for critical management activities; relevant funding lacking |
The respective
management authorities have adequate scientific and administrational personnel for critical management activities by EoY 5. |
Initiated within the
study for the ENR (the study will make clear recommendation on the kind of support required for establishment of efficient management system for ENR) (MK) |
N/A for AL
Reassessment of natural values of Ezerani Strict Nature Reserve commenced April 2007 due to be completed soon. Activities for strengthening the management of ENR will follow upon the finalization of the study on ENR (MK)
|
|
|
|
Trans-boundary monitoring of important biotic and abiotic factors functioning/not functioning. |
No monitoring system in place in AL and MK; In GR*, the Society for Protection of Prespa (SPP) has experience in monitoring several biotic and abiotic parameters |
Establishment of monitoring and conservation working group (MCWG) in first six months; MCWG operational by EoY1;
Participatory field survey protocols standardized by EoY1;
Assessment of terrestrial & aquatic habitats for priority bird and mammal species by
EoY 2;
Capacity building and training programs underway by EoY1;
Monitoring system in place and generating useful data by end of EoY 2 (including GIS).
|
Trans-boundary MCWG established in October 2007 and functioning. It has
convened a total of
3 times to make technical decisions on the
development of the TB Monitoring system. (TB)
Protocols for development of TB monitoring system completed (TB)
Protocols for determination of priority species completed. (TB)
|
Trans-boundary Monitoring and Conservation Working Group (MCWG) continued work and support of processes in this reporting peroiod. The group met 5 times to make decisions and support the development of the TB Monitoring System (TB)
The preparatory stage of the TB Monitoring system is completed and the following has been achieved through expert input and endorsement of the MCWG: Aims of the TB Monitoring System; Geographical Scale; Significant Elements and Values to be Monitored; Stakeholders; Estimated Available Sources of Funding; Connection to EU Legislation and Policy; Guidelines on Indicators, the Institutions for Implementing the TBMS, National Resources and Trilateral Administration, Equipment, and Training (TB)
TB Monitoring System project compiled a meta-database consisting of the environmental monitoring programmes active in Prespa, together with analytical description sheets for each monitoring (TB).
Three agroment stations established and operational. (AL) |
|
|
|
Within the key
protected areas
human activities (e.g. including forestry, fishing, building) may/may not be practiced in an uncontrolled and/or unsustainable way (MK, AL, GR*) |
No adequate
control mechanisms for unsustainable human activities in the protected areas
|
Warden and
control mechanisms (effective EIA process; law enforcement etc.) for controlling unsustainable
human activities in protected areas exist and are effectively implemented; Expansion of
scheme outside
key protected areas (i.e. Trout streams)
|
Problems analyzed
within the studies currently being under preparation (ENR, pesticide packaging management etc. (MK)
|
Prespa National Park administration is actually the only site administrator – but administration authority not yet legally established. The authority will be established under KfW Project. (AL)
Applies only to Ezerani NR in MK. Awaiting results of revalorisation study. The efforts for mainstreaming the ecosystem priorities in the key sectors, and in particular the preparation of various management plans (spatial, water, forestry, fisheries, protected areas, species and habitats conservation), provide the required mechanisms for more controlled development in the region, especially in the particularly sensitive and vulnerable areas. (MK) |
|
Outcome 4: |
Outcome 4:
Stakeholders build upon ongoing trans-boundary cooperation in the Prespa Basin by strengthening the trans-boundary coordination mechanism and piloting trans- boundary conservation and water management
|
Bat colonies protected and
monitored in MK, AL
and GR*.
|
Bat colonies known to a
good extent, but not protected or monitored. |
Priority bat colonies
protected and monitored by year 3. |
Under protection,
4000-5000 individuals, 90% of which are
Minioptrus schreidersi (Al) |
idem (AL)
No progress within project. Galicia NP are working on bats with KfW funding – findings to be included in their management plan.(MK) |
|
|
|
Continuing financial
and institutional commitment from three littoral states (local and/or national commitments).
|
No long-term
formal commitments
|
Continuing
financial and institutional commitments made to adequately staff and continue operations of key project- inspired processes and use of tools
|
Increasing
challenges with securing financial commitment from Greece during project implementation could potentially jeopardize the tri- lateral outcomes. (TB)
An agreement is signed between 3 local authorities of the countries (Al)
|
Financail commitment from Greece did not materialize during this reporting period and continues to jeopardize the tri-lateral outcomes. Commitment confirmed by the Government of Albania and the Former Yugolsav Republic of Macedonia (TB).
Pesticide disposal to be paid by municipal tax. Natural Capital Resource Centre and Ezerani NR commitment sought to pay staff after project. Commitment through various plans – Watershed Management Plan, Strategic Action Plans and Spatial Plans – will have costed actions and sources of support – will be obligatory when approved by the authorities. Fisheries and Forestry – regulated by existing legislation. Agriculture – private sector with new incentives. Wastewater – locals pay costs; replication expected. (MK) |
|
|
|
Declaration for the
Prespa Park is/is not followed by specific tri-lateral agreement
|
No
trilaterally agreed plan exists for the Prespa Basin
|
Agreed
Strategic Action
Program/Plan for Prespa basin with long-term operational objectives,
commitments
and ways to strengthen
trans-boundary management (output 4.7)
|
Consultants for
undertaking implementation of the TDA-SAP identified and work will commence in Aug
2008 (TB)
|
Development of the TDA-SAP underway in this reporting period and advancing well. First TDA draft expected in August 2009. (TB) |
|
|
|
Ecological
requirements for endemic trout understood and protected.
|
Species
Action Plan (through research carried out in GR* and MK) to be produced by summer
2007.
|
In-stream flows
and water quality maintained in Brajcino, Krani, Leva and
Aghios
Germanos
Rivers by end of year 3;
Pilot action taken according to Species Action Plan by EoY 2;
Habitat protection status ensured in both countries (i.e. establishment of closed seasons, fishing bans, establishment of protection zone, maintenance of riparian forests- avoiding
erosion, etc.) by
EoY 2;
Efficient wardening for illegal angling in both countries by EoY 2;
Pollution problems ameliorated by EoY 4
|
No action initiated
yet
|
N/A for AL
In-stream flows to be determined for Brajcino, Krani, Leva within Watershed Management Plan. (MK)
The Brajcino trout conservation action plan prepared by Society for Protection of Prespa (GR NGO) and in cooperation with Macedonian NGO, to be reviewed in the course of preparation of species and habitats conservation action plans in order to be adequately considered and presented to the transboundary stakeholders (TB) |
|
|
|
Governments
commit/ do not commit to funding full time executive secretary position for Prespa Park Coordination Committee. |
No such
position or funding exists. |
Commitment by
EoY. 3. Funding by EoY. 4.
|
Still no funding
commitment (TB)
|
No funding commitment from the Governments as such. Executive Secretary possition not supported by UNDP. (TB) |
|
|
|
Imperial eagle
nesting habitat enhanced/protected, along with other important raptor and vulture nesting habitats enhanced/protected simultaneously (e.g. Golden Eagle, or rare nocturnal species) in MK, AL and GR*.
|
Ecological
needs of eagle not understood by protected areas, forest managers or MoEPP. |
Sub-Working
Group on Birdlife formulates trans- boundary conservation actions for forest raptor species following by EoY1;
Pilot conservation actions applied by EoY2;
At least two different potential eagle- nesting areas under special management by year 3. |
This will
addressed as part of the priority species action planning process underway. (TB) |
To be addressed by the Species and Habitats action planning process whill will commence in July 2009. (TB) |
|
|
|
Inhabitants and
stakeholders in the 3 countries aware/ unaware of Prespa values and informed on project activities |
Environme
ntal education/n ature interpretatio n programs executed by SPP in
GR*-Prespa during recent past; SPP Information Center on Trans- boundary Prespa Park operating in Aghios Germanos; Info Center in
Zagradec, Micro Prespa (AL). |
Increased
awareness of stakeholders on values of Prespa and project activities –
20% by EoY 2 and 50% by EoY 4. |
Company
currently undertaking development of Communication, Education and Public Awareness Strategy for the Prespa Lakes Basin. Baseline will be determined and improvement in conditions will be reported based on the monitoring over the next year. (TB) |
Communication, Educaton and Public Awareness Strategy finalized in October 2008 and endorsed by the PPCC in November 2008. Public awareness materials (Prespa Awareness Kit) printed and distributed to stakeholders and public. Communication Specialis was hired to support the public awareness activities. (TB)
A local communication and PA exert is hired to assist on implementation of CEPA. Targeted educational programme is developed and is on progress on Prespa ecosystem (AL)
Numerous public awareness raising activities taking place in the course of implementation of various project components (stakeholder meetings and consultations, workshops, publications, media events and etc.) (MK)
|
|
|
|
NP and forest
managers formulate trans-boundary management actions for priority trans- boundary forest biotopes [mountain meadows and rangelands of Galicica/Mali I Thate, juniper forest on Kalammas peninsula, Varnous Mountain – PPA (GR*) /Pelister PNP (MK)].
|
No consensus
among managers regarding cooperative trans- boundary management of forest biotopes |
Identification
and prioritization of habitats by
EoY1 according to the
NATURA 2000 methodology or any other compatible one; Establishment
of protection corridors (where feasible) in case of non-adjacent PAs by EoY 1;
Development of management plans by EoY 2;
Common monitoring of actions agreed and implemented by EoY 2;
Pilot application of management actions by EoY
3. |
Development of
Mgt Plan for Galicica National Park initiated through parallel financing from KfW but administrative challenges remain on the Albanian side due to administrative reasons. The trans- boundary MCWG contributes to this process. Targets will need to be revisited. (TB) |
Pending Species and Habitats Action Plan to commence in July 2009. (TB) |
|
|
|
PPCC is/is not a legal entity under International Law |
PPCC is an informal institution with no legal basis. |
PPCC is legal entity as agreed to under trilateral agreement. |
First assessment on institutional maturation of the PPCC completed in 2007 and national consultations underway. Path towards formalizing tri-
lateral cooperation outlined. (TB)
|
Assesment on institutional maturaton of PPCC presented and endorsed by the PPCC, the process of assessing options for transboundary institutional arrangements has been initiated and next steps have been identifiedand. The status and the role of the PPCC has been agreed by Albanian and Macedonian Ministries of Environment. Political situation between Greece and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia burdens futher progress in this area. (TB)
|
|
|
|
Rare water-bird
conservation through trans-boundary protection of
breeding and nesting habitats in MK, AL and GR*.
|
Reedbed and
wet meadows under some management in GR*, but not in MK and AL;
No sufficient wardening applied in MK, AL and GR*. |
Sub-Working
Group on Birdlife formulates
trans-boundary conservation actions for water birds in both lakes by EoY1;
Pilot conservation actions applied by EoY2; Monitoring of pilot actions. |
This overlaps with
other indicators on trans-boundary species and habitat conservation priorities. Suggest combining. (TB) |
To be completed under the Species and Habitats Action plan, to commence in July 2009. (TB) |
|
|
|
Three states agree/ disagree on transboundary habitat conservation priorities that reflect ecological management
objectives for sustainable use and conservation of species and ecosystem health and agree upon specific programmes |
Management regime is not aligned regarding basin-wide important species and habitats |
Three states agree on trans-boundary habitat conservation priorities that reflect ecological management objectives. Two habitat-related pilot projects agreed by EoY 1; relevant management activities implemented by EoY 3.
|
Priority habitat identification process (in addition to those identified in the project document only now being initiated) (TB) |
To be completed under the Species and Habitats Action plan, to commence in July 2009. (TB) |
|
|
|
Robust shared database on priority ecosystem and species health parameters. |
No shared database w/ updated information; x-boundary discussions occur w/no support data. |
MCWG or relevant Sub-working Group defines parameters and rules for access to database; Shared database populated with reliable data supports x-boundary discussions.
|
MCWG has reached agreement on the need for production of a shared database. This is under development (TB)
GIS experts is contracted by the TB unit and is working in establishing the most appropriate data and information formats in a trans-boundary perspective (TB) |
Part of the TB Monitoring system development and is linked to TB Habitat and Species Conservation Planning Process, to commence in July 2009. (TB)
GIS expertise finalized, some defficiencies present, GIS assesment and maps prepared. (TB).
Several maps are produced by the Albanian component (AL)
|
|
|
|
Three states agree on trans-boundary fish conservation priorities that reflect ecological management objectives for sustainable use and conservation of native species and aquatic ecosystem health and agree upon specific program of measures for cooperative fish management. |
Management regime does not reflect ecosystem objectives, though three countries ban fishing during spawning season. |
Three states cooperate on enforcement; monitoring; and research by EoY 3. |
Trans-boundary fisheries management specialist due to be engaged in fall of 2008 to facilitate this process (TB) |
Consultancy on Transboundary Fisheries management launched in November, 2 technical stakeholder workshops held, proposal for transboundary fisheries management process to be finalized in July 2009. (TB) |
|
|
|
Reduction in level of threat to endemic fish posed by exotics in all 3 countries. Conservation of genetic diversity of endemic fish species in all 3 countries. |
Not understood or even recognized as a problem in MK, AL and GR*. SPP holds long term data on native, endemic and introduced fish species |
Priority threats to endemic fish from exotics, habitat change, and overfishing and re-introductions understood by EoY1;
Absolute prevention of introductions of predatory fish species of potential commercial value interest; Management action agreed by EoY 2;
Pilot measures underway to reduce them by EoY 4.
|
Priority threats from exotics not assessed yet but anticipated to be part of the TB Fisheries mgt consultancy being initiated (TB); |
To be addressed by the Transboundary Fisheries management process. (TB)
Further analyses to be supported in the course of defining transboundary fisheries management actions (TB) |
|
|
|
Wetland vegetation in GR *and AL and MK are managed and their habitat values enhanced
|
Wet meadows are under some management in GR *(with 100 ha of wet meadows in Micro Prespa) but not in AL |
Wet meadows in GR* are restored and properly managed in GR*-Prespa (targeting at the maintenance of minimum 100 ha);
Pilot projects are starting in AL-Prespa.
|
Suggest combining this indicator with TB habitat and species. (TB) |
N/A for AL
N/A for MK. |
|
|
|
Tri-national eco-tourism management plan is/is not endorsed and promotion underway. Network of operational Information Centres in all 3 States. |
No regional tourism management planning SPP Info Centre operational in GR*; operation of more Info Centres by Protected area authority-GR* imminent; Info Centre in Gorica;
|
New tourism management and investment plan in place by year 5.
Ensure the capacity and viability of Info Centers in all 3 sides; Network these Info Centers |
Process for selection of a consultant to facilitate the development of a tri-lateral eco-tourism plan is underway and work to be initiated by Aug 2008. (TB) |
Consultancy on development of tri-lateral ecotourisam plan finalized in December 2008, assesment concluded and process underlined. ToR for the assigment was developed as part of this consultancy, to be advertised in July 2009. (TB) |
|
Outcome 5: |
Outcome 5:
Lessons learned and adaptive management of project
|
Effective delivery rate |
Block B
delivery
|
As good or better than Block B delivery rate |
Delivery has been slower than anticipated but steadily picking up pace as there are number of ongoing recruitments/procu rements |
Delivery for 2008 was 92%., delivery till 30 June 2009 32.53 % (TB):
Delivery 50.18% (AL)
Delivery till June 30 2009 is 54.31 %. Delivery for 2008 was 93.4 %.
|
|
|
|
Positive evaluations |
First evaluation |
Improvement with each
successive evaluation.
|
N/A for the reporting period |
First evaluation of the project carried in the reporting period, and the project performance marked as marginaly satisfactory. (TB)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 6: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 7: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 8: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 9: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 10: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 11: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 12: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 13: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 14: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 15: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 16: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 17: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 18: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 19: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 20: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 21: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 22: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 23: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 24: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 25: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 26: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 27: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 28: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 29: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 32: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 33: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 34: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 35: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 36: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 37: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 38: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 39: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outcome 40: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[4] This should be a quantitative numerical value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
