January 2007

NGO SMALL GRANTS PROGRAMME 2005-2007

NGO Feed-back and Project Assessment
Missions Autumn 2006

AUTHORS

PREPARED BY:
Alexander Zinke, together with
Paul Csagoly
Rayka Hauser
Mark Redman
Peter Whalley

Table of Contents

1. Introduction..................................................................................................................4
2. General Findings of the Missions 2006 .......................................................................5
3. Brief Results from Assessed NGO Projects.................................................................7
Summary tables presenting all NGO projects visited and the key findings. .................8
4. Synthesis of the DRP SGP ........................................................................................15
Annexes.........................................................................................................................17
ANNEX I Detail Results from Assessment of Regional Projects ................................18
ANNEX II Detail Results from Assessment of National Projects ................................17
ANNEX III Re-assessment of NGO Creative Project .................................................17
ANNEX IV Lists of all granted national and regional NGO projects ...........................72

Short REPORT TITLE | PAGE 3

3

1. Introduction

Objective of this assessment is
· to gain information and a feed-back from NGOs on the progress and if available
results of their projects,
· to assess if and how these projects effectively (i.e. cost-efficiently, sustainably)
contribute to the reduction of nutrient and toxic pollution of Danube basin waters. This
refers to typical pollution problems (e.g. from agriculture) and model-like pollution
prevention and remediation measures (lessons for DRP), and
· to identify success stories attractive to be communicated by DRP.

Assessment topics were:
· Presentation and explanation of the NGO projects (objectives, progress of activities)
and check of NGO action quality (scientific, preparatory work, efficiency to reach
target groups etc.) and their environmental relevance in relation to the DRP key
issues.
· Implementation of the projects by the NGO: solving of local execution problems,
cooperation with key stakeholders (polluter, authorities, media), link to (information
from) DRP, ICPDR, national government and DEF (homepages and contacts).
· Evaluation of the environment benefit of the NGO actions (water body
deterioration). Visible and/or measurable impact, multiplication by others/change of
practises.
· Evaluation of the institutional benefit of the grant(s) for the NGO (its capacity
building, positioning as a key stakeholder).
· Experience with the REC grant selection and project administration process
(NGO input needed to win the grant, REC guidance during execution, administration
and if possible to answer finalisation).
· Communication (whom, how) of the project and outputs so far / up to end of project.
· Promotion of the DRP logo in the project; Attractiveness of the granted project for
communication to external audiences by DRP et al. (e.g. articles in DRP
publications).

Mission methodology was a meeting with the competent NGO manager (in their office or a
central town or at REC office) of ca. 2 hours and, in a few cases, also a field visit - to
assess the topics listed before. The local REC offices were always pre-informed and in many
cases facilitated the arranging of these meetings.
Out of the 62 projects granted via the REC in late 2005 (with NGO activities to be completed
by the end of 2006/early 2007), DRP delegates visited a varying number of NGOs in the
Danube basin in autumn 2006.

4

Country-wise, the DRP region was covered as follows:

Country Number
of
granted
No. of assessed
% of granted projects
NGO projects
NGO projects
assessed
Czech Republic
5
3
65%
Slovak Republic
6
4
75%
Hungary 11
3
27%
Slovenia 4
4
100%
Croatia 4
4
100%
Bosnia & Hercegovina
6
2
33%
Serbia 5
0
0%
Bulgaria 7
6
86%
Romania 5
4
80%
Moldova 4
4
100%
Regional NGO Projects
5
5
100%
(number of NGOs involved)
(14)
(9)
(64%)
Total
57 natl. & 5 regional 34 natl. & 5 regl.
60% and 100%
In addition, one NGO project from DRP Round 1 (building of a small WWTP in a rural area in
eastern Slovakia) was re-assessed, as it received due to its model character - additional
funds and an extension of the project period until 2006. Results are given in Annex III.

At the start of the assessment, it was agreed with the DRP office that not all but a substantial
number of projects should be assessed. The selection, which NGO projects were eventually
assessed, was based on both
· importance/relevance of activities in relation to DRP key issues (preference on
nutrient reduction and concrete field projects),
· priority for large grants, which theoretically can result in more important outputs (i.e.
all regional and the biggest national projects were assessed), and
· time- and cost-efficient arrangement of meetings (i.e. no long travel needed for
each meeting; easy link to another mission in that country/region).

As a result, 39 NGO projects, covering all DRB countries except for Serbia could be
assessed, including all 5 regional projects and 60% of the nationally granted projects. The
selection is therefore rated as more than representative for all granted projects.

2. General Findings of the Missions 2006

The missions conducted by the DRP consultants came to the following general results:

High quality of NGO projects
Even more than in Round 1, the work of NGOs and the use of UNDP/GEF DRP grant money
was found in the overwhelming number of projects as very good: Even though the individual
funds were very small (USD 3,000 15,000 for national grants), NGOs conducted
impressive activities and much contributed to a multiple raising of environment awareness
among local people, local and national authorities and stakeholders from agriculture,
municipalities and industry.

Good grant administration by REC
Nearly all NGOs interviewed stated that the support the REC offices provided during grant
application and execution was very good, compared to other donor programmes. No NGO
complained or criticised this process as too difficult or too bureaucratic.
Short REPORT TITLE | PAGE 5

5

The only real problem happened in few countries and here in a few cases (up to 10% of the
awarded grants) where

· the RECs Local Advisory Board (LAB) assessing and deciding on grant awarding
came up with severe cut backs of the budget that the NGOs designed and
applied for. In these few cases, such substantial cut-back (i.e. more than one third of
what the NGO applied for) required a change of the project contents. This was not
perceived by all NGOs as positive but they accepted (did they have a choice?). DRP
Consultants learned that many NGOs are in fact used to certain budget cut-backs,
which means that donors (here the REC) and many NGOs usually do not expect that
a proposed budget will be fully granted. This may lead to a situation that NGOs
automatically ask for more than they actually need, or that donors automatically do
not trust a proposed budget. Question is if this is a good granting policy.

· The overall period that NGOs given to execute their activities was less than the
designed and announced 12 months: While some of the REC offices secured grant
awarding, contracting and first payment in the period December 2005 to January
2006 (e.g. in BG within one month!), the payment process was delayed in few
countries (CZ, SK) up to April 2006, thus leaving the NGOs only 8-9 months for their
project execution. As a result, such NGO projects were done under big stress and
with lower quality than planned and possible.
In Croatia, implementation deadlines were extended for three out of the four national
projects, one of them until as late as April 2007. This allows for sufficient
implementation time but also makes it difficult to evaluate some of the projects e.

Good indirect environmental relevance of NGO projects
Due to the very small budgets and limited execution time (at best 12 months), most NGOs
usually could not list direct benefits of their projects e.g. in terms of reduced nutrient
pollution. The effect of these projects will usually be measurable only as an indirect effect
over several years (slow change of environment-sensitive practises e.g. by private
consumers, farmers or industries). Thus, through the NGOs specific environment awareness
raising work, technical advisory to polluters and lobbying, which was substantially supported
by this DRP grant programme, the image of pollution (perceived over decades as "normal" or
a "trivial offence") is being changed considerably in the Danube basin, and parallel efforts by
other stakeholders (government, local environment authorities, international environment
programmes, etc.) are complemented, supported and strengthened by these NGO activities.

Excellent promotion of the UNDP/GEF DRP support
Different to Round 1, this time nearly all NGOs displayed the donor acknowledgement
where-ever possible. The DRP and REC logos and the grant acknowledgement to be quoted
is visible in all publications (fliers, brochures, posters, videos, power point presentations,
press releases, web pages etc.).

Initiation of cross-sector partnerships
In almost every NGO project, the SGP has catalysed new partnerships among NGOs and
industries, farmers, water management bodies, local authorities and scientific institutions.
Some of the contacts dated back before the start of this SGP; but in many cases cooperation
was initiated especially for the purposes of the specific project; finally, new partnerships were
established in the course of project implementation, especially with industries interested in
improving their wastewater management practices, as well as with farmers willing to convert
to organic agriculture. Most interviewed project leaders stated that the project had helped
them strengthen cooperation, and quoted plans for further joint activities beyond the project's
end.

6

Weak NGO networking
Quite a number of NGOs implementing related project activities within the SGP and other
DRP components did not communicate or cooperate. Too often, NGOs were vaguely aware
of each others' activities or existence, whereas cooperation could have considerably
enhanced project results. For example, a professional organisation in Croatia running
seminars and discussions on industrial wastewater treatment technologies complained of
weak NGO turnout at their events, while another SGP implementing NGO felt they were
lacking exactly this technical expertise to support their lobbying and partnerships with food
processing industries. There was also no link between the above projects and the REC-
administered demonstration project in the framework of the DRP component on Public
Access to Information (3.4), which dealt with very similar issues and, in one case, with the
same polluter. While the responsibility for searching out partners lies with the NGOs
themselves, there is a potentially major role for the organisation overseeing the grants to
support such networking and emphasize its importance, not only through the presentation of
projects at winners' meetings (where most REC offices were at least facilitating such
contacting), but also by promoting further dialogue and subsequent proactive information
sharing and updating.

Strong communication results
Most NGO projects had strong communication components and were able to demonstrate
that communications work had reached their target audiences (increased calls from citizens,
turnout at events or hits on websites, interest from journalists). Many interviewed NGOs kept
records of media coverage to submit with their final reports. Few of the interviewed NGOs felt
they needed additional skills in working with the media, while in several countries REC had
provided such training.

3. Brief Results from Assessed NGO Projects

As indicated in chapter 1, this assessment process was using a standard format to allow a
certain comparison of interviews and results. In the following pages, the individual interview
and visit results are summarised.

The tables on the next pages provide a brief project information and the Consultants
comments on each of the regional and national projects assessed. More details about the
background, activities and results of these projects are given in Annex I (regional projects)
and Annex II (national projects).

Annex III provides an update of the Slovak SGP Round I project that received extra funding
from the DRP in 2005 but, due to permit-receiving problems, had to be extended into 2006.

Annex IV provides the overview of all projects that received grants in 2006, therefore also
indicating those NGO projects that could not be visited during this assessment.

Short REPORT TITLE | PAGE 7

7

Summary tables presenting all NGO projects visited and the key findings.

Regional Projects
Project no. / NGO
Project Title and
Budget
Consultant comment
Name
subject
USD
Overall quality of project
Rating of environmental
Attractive
(leader + number of
(very good, good, average)
relevance to DRP issues
for Commu-
NGO partners)
(very high, high, average, no)
nication
21722 Green Action Strengthening NGO 50,000
Good: Green Action as leader together with Very high: This project
Yes!

participation in EU -
other 3 NGOs partners managed to
secures institutional develop-
and 3 partners in WFD
establish themselves as recognised
ment, awareness and public
BiH, SRB + SLO
implementation in
stakeholders in the Sava basin.
participation of NGOs at
Sava River Basin
international river basin level
21727 Association
Preserving the
35,000
Average: Project output (DVD) is very
High: Important activity to
Limited;
Storklja/SI
water by promoting
sustainable and useful and NGO coopera-
raise family awareness on
unique
+ Roda Parents in
diapers friendly for
tion is good but very few funds are given
waste and water pollution
project!
Action/HR
earth and baby
from SI to HR side to conduct pioneer work
21719 Holocen /HU Barriers and
28,000
Average: The NGOs work at very local
Average: The addressed
Not really
+ Dialogue /HU
Bridges
level; the outputs are not really impressive
issues are very typical for
+ Silvanus/RO
at DRB scale.
DRB
Association for
Cross-sectoral Co-
29,970
Potentially Good: But unfortunately
High: The project set-out to
No sadly a
Integrated Rural
operation for Good
seriously limited by the financial and
develop model farms for
wasted
Development (BG)
Water Quality
management discrepancies that resulted in demonstrating the DRP
opportunity!
and RO Ornitholo-
Mgmt. on Lower
the Romanian component of the project
concept of Best Agricultural
gical Society (RO)
Danube Farms
being closed in late 2006
Practice
Black Sea NGO
Best Agricultural
34,978
Very good: A well-formulated project with
Very high: Introduced and
Yes -
Network (BG), Earth Practice in my
realistic objectives for the available time-
adapted the concept of Best
reinforces
Friends (RO) and
Farm: NGOs,
frame/budget that was undertaken
Agricultural Practice (BAP) at
several key
Eco Counselling
Farmers, Specia-
professionally and effectively
local/regional level by working
messages
Centre (MD)
lists Working
(based on assessment of BG and RO
in partnership with NGOs,
originating
together for BAP in
farmers and specialists whilst
BG, RO and MD
components)
from the
fully and effectively exploiting
the benefits of trans-boundary
DRP
co-operation btw BG, RO & MD

National NGO Projects
Country / NGO
Project Title and
Budget
Consultant comment
Name
subject
USD
Overall quality of project
Rating of environmental
Attractive for
(very good, good, average)
relevance to DRP issues
Commu-nication
(very high, high, average, no)
SLO - Institute for
Effective Protection of
10,000
Very good: Multiple list of partners and
High: Concrete pollution
Yes!
Environmental
Water in Rural Areas in
activities secured growing awareness/
problem (typical for DRB)
Protection
Podonavje, Using
education to start changing conventional
addressed at various levels
Promotion
Ecoremedia-tion
practises in the target region and beyond
to sustain remediation
SLO - ICRO
Individual Waste Water
10,000
Good: Small NGO addresses important
High: Very typical pollution
No attractive
Cleaning Sys-tems for
environment problem, well involving key
problem of rural areas.
actions!
Households and Farms
local stakeholders but cannot sustain
in Disper-sed
remediation.
Settlements
SLO - Storklja
Preserving the Water by 10,000
Good: NGO is experienced and has a well
High: Project will have an
Not so much!
Promoting the
developed network of contacts to sustain its impact on the phosphate
Production and Use of
activities
discharges into SI waters
Phosphate-free
Detergents
SLO - Society
Underground Water and 10,000
Very good: Small-scale, concrete and
High: At local scale (protect-
Very high!
"Krnica"
Farmers
visible action with many local stakeholders
ted wetland) clear benefits at
short and long term.
HR Brod
DRP II 01-05
11,950
Good: addressing important and large
High: encouraging the
Little: no actual
Environmental
Cooperation for a
scale pollution problems, with some
public, polluters and
results on the
Association
Cleaner Sava
prospects of mobilising the public and
authorities to address
ground
«Earth» (ZEUS)
Municipal and industrial
polluters, although no tangible results on
wastewater management
(and partners)
waste-water
the ground within the project's duration.
issues
management
HR Club PBN
DRP II 02-05 Informing
15,000
Good: raised interest of industries in the
High: providing polluters
Yes: real

the public about the
topic through presentations on future (EU)
with tools to improve their
partnerships and
(and partners)
advanta-ges of
obligations; provided technical assistance
environmental performance
provi-sion of
industrial wastewater
for improved environmental performance;
tech-nical exper-
treat-ment technologies
some weakness in involving environmental
tise to interested
NGOs and other potential pressure groups.
industries

9

National NGO Projects
Country / NGO
Project Title and
Budget
Consultant comment
Name
subject
USD
Overall quality of project
Rating of environmental
Attractive for
(very good, good, average)
relevance to DRP issues
Commu-nication
(very high, high, average, no)
HR Europe
DRP II 03-05 Promotion 11,970
Very good: built on assessment of Round I
Very high: addressing land
Yes! Present
House Vukovar
of ecological and
results and requests by beneficiaries; addres-
degradation and pollution
results and

organic agriculture:
ing the range of factors for the development of
through enabling agricultural future prospects;
(and partners)
Phase II organic
organic agriculture (farmer expertise, access to
producers to adopt organic
interesting
agriculture
financial support, certification, access to
practices, while encouraging partners.
markets, consumer awareness). Present
consumers and authorities to
(strengthened markets, trained farmers,
attracted financial support) and expected future
support such a change.
results (new organic producers certified),
strengthened positions of project partners,
plans for follow up activities.
HR - "HYLA"
DRP II 05-05 Let us
9,945
Average: addressing biodiversity degrada-
No: Limited potential future
No
Society for the
learn about amphibians
tion of a vulnerable class of animals; results effect on biodiversity, mostly
Research and
the first to be affected
showed clear relationship between pollution through plans for addressing
Protection of
biodiversity impacts of
and biodiversity. Not clear to what extent
physical habitat destruction;
Amphibians and
agricultural pollution
this has had an effect on local awareness.
no follow-up strategy to
Reptiles; Green
Good partnerships developed with local
address agricultural
Osijek
NGOs.
pollution.
CZ - Veronica
STOP for Phospha-tes - 7,500
Good: NGO cooperates with key public
Average: Project effects on
Little!
Clean Water not only in
partners and focuses on a large model
environment are very limited.
the South Moravia
region, but has little critique on government
Region
CZ - Renesance of Moravian Carst - A
7,700
Good: Concrete farming practises is
Average: Sensitive area
Yes!
Country
Model Site of Protected
demonstrated to other local farmers by
needs informed farmers but
Surface and
various communication means
no short-term benefits and
Underground Carstic
no guarantee of success
Waters in the DRB
CZ - Bioinstitute
Organic Agriculture
7,500
Very good: NGO secures long-term and
High: DRP project is linked
Yes!!
o.p.s., Olomouc
for Water Protection
multiple communication by disseminating
to other NGO activities and
and its use for the
instructive information material
contacts facilitating execu-
Morava River Basin
tion of organic farming

10

National NGO Projects
Country / NGO
Project Title and
Budget
Consultant comment
Name
subject
USD
Overall quality of project
Rating of environmental
Attractive for
(very good, good, average)
relevance to DRP issues
Commu-nication
(very high, high, average, no)
SK - BROZ
Protection and Reno-
8,000
Very good: NGO succeeded in difficult
Very high: Better wetland
Yes!
vation of Danube's
stakeholder cooperation to sustain more
management to support
Midland Delta
ecological floodplain management
flood and nutrient retention
SK - Bohatska
Removal of Nitrogen
7,000
Average: NGO established new stake-
Average: Some relevance at No!
sanca
and Fostering of
holder partnership and initiated pollution
local scale
Communication in the
awareness.
Zitava Basin
SK - Umbra
Revitalization of Cilizsky 7,200
Good: Small-scale action to engage
Good: Re-introduction of
Good idea, yet
Stream in the Common
various stakeholders in local wetland
wetlands and red list Danube no impressive
Interest of the Partners
management. Limited results due to difficult fish species.
results
of the Danubian Fluvial
conditions.
Coalition
SK - Friends of the The Future Without
9,000
Very good: Very impressive list of diverse, Very high: Haz. substances Yes!!!
Earth
Toxic Pollution in the
well developed and effective NGO
are key subjects abundant
Danube Basin POPs
activities, showing short-term results
in DRB but rarely addressed
in Sala town
by NGOs
BG - Intereco-21
Cleaning the Danube
5,800
Average: Few activities, unclear concept
Average: Littering and bad
Theoretically
Federation
River Valley in Lom
and outputs, partly changed during the
waste management in small
yes
Municipality from
project. Asset: Activation of Roma people.
municipalities are typical
Wastes
problems
BG - Euromodel
Reconstruction of Wet
5,900
Good: Initiation of local stakeholders to
No: Very limited effect for
No
Assoc.
Land Habitats in
care about a deteriorated wetland.
biodiversity; better effect for
Oriahovo Municipal.
raising public awareness
BG - Regional
Improvement of the
6,200
Good: Small NGO dealing with very
Very high: Awareness on
Yes
Initiative
environmental status of
important environment issue. Grant used to transboundary heavy metal
Association
Danube at Timok
strengthen capacity at various levels
pollution causing cancer
valley

11

National NGO Projects
Country / NGO
Project Title and
Budget
Consultant comment
Name
subject
USD
Overall quality of project
Rating of environmental
Attractive for
(very good, good, average)
relevance to DRP issues
Commu-nication
(very high, high, average, no)
BG - European
Competition for Movies
5,000
Very good: Young NGO with amazing
High: Promotes and
Yes
Environmental
& Documen-taries
success. Creative event with multiple
supports environment films
Festival
about Danube Basin
activities addressing film makers, kids and
as important education and
Foundation
Pollution
environment experts
awareness tools
BG - Bulgarian Bio- More Space for Rivers
5,100
Very good: NGO addressed a weak sector Very high: Integrated flood
Yes!
diversity
and Safety for People
in water management and introduced new
management, making use of
Foundation
techniques in flood management.
natural retention areas
BG - "World for
To Stop Danube
5,700
Good: A very simple project, not too
Average: Monitoring of
Yes 
All" Association,
River Nutrient
ambitious with achievable objectives in the
water quality added little
interesting
Silistra
Pollution
limited time available. Easily replicable by
value to existing data avai-
example of local
other local NGOs.
lable, but was a useful tool
aware-ness-
for raising public attention
raising project
and local awareness
BiH CESD
Cleaner production in
5,200
Good: Simple activity producing "souve-
High: Upgraded pollution
Yes!
Sarajevo
food industry
nirs" to sustain multiple effects over time.
awareness of industry
BiH NERDA /
Save the Spreca river
13,400
Very good: The REC-induced cooperation
At short term and large scale Yes!
Ekopot / Radio
(Sava river basin)
of 3 different partners assured good and
no relevance, at local scale
Kameleon
multiple stakeholder awareness
extremely important to
address pollution problems
HU - HOLOCEN
Sajó-Hernád Rivers
5,580
Average: Apparently good start to identify
Average: Typical mix of land No
Flood and Water
local environment problems and foster
use problems
Pollution Priorities
stakeholder cooperation, no real effects
HU - Tavirozsa
Szdrákos Creek
4,651
Very good: Excellent actions taken and
Very high: Direct relation to
Yes!
Association
Program - Phase 2
well-managed by local NGO that knows the reducing nutrient pollution
issues
through improving wetlands
HU - Clean Air
Chemical Reduction
5,581 Average:
Little success with farmers as
Average: Little success with No
Working Group
and Pollution Pre-
NGO very new to this issue.
agro-chemicals, more on
vention Campaign
household bug killers.

12

National NGO Projects
Country / NGO
Project Title and
Budget
Consultant comment
Name
subject
USD
Overall quality of project
Rating of environmental
Attractive for
(very good, good, average)
relevance to DRP issues
Commu-nication
(very high, high, average, no)
HU - Magosfa
Ipoly River Cleaning
4,651
Good: Success with river cleaning action
Average: It's more about
Yes (river cleanup
Alapítvány
Action and Environ-
but less with farmers.
solid waste around river.
action only)
mentally-Friendly
Technologies Exhibition
MD Public
Reactivation of the
14,000
Very Good: Second DRP grant that builds
Very High: All aspects
Yes
Association
secondary (biological)
on the first. Provided significant assistance
relevant pollution reduction
`Calitatea Mediuli'
water purifying stage
to WWTWs (technical, financial assess-
achieved! Awareness raising
in the wastewater
ment and procurement). Extensive aware-
on nutrients (environmental
treatment plant of
ness raising on nutrients with schools, local and health).
Ungheni District
authorities, etc. Provided test kits and
training on nutrients. Good radio exposure.
MD - Public
The reduction of
10,000
Very Good: Second DRP grant aimed at
Very High: Good synergy
Yes
Association
nutrient pollution in
introducing Best Agricultural Practices and
with main DRP activities on
`Cutezatorul'
the Danube Basin
providing advice on organic farming. Good
agriculture
through the promo-
exposure on radio and newspapers plus
tion and use of good
significant number of farmers etc. informed
agricultural practices
through seminars. Contact with World Bank
APC project
MD - Public
`The Danube and I'
7,920
Good: Number of initiatives to raise
High: Awareness raising
Yes
Association `Mediul Media Campaign
awareness in children, teachers and
and education on pollution.
si Sanatatea
parents on environment and human health
issues related to environment.
MD - Cahul
Public Involvement in
8,080
Good: Wide range of environmental issues High: Toxic substance
Limited
Ecologic
the Process of Nutrient
being addressed (nutrients is now a minor
analysis and awareness
Consultations
Reduction in the Lower
part, but focus is on pesticide dumps in
raising link to health.
Centre
Prut Basin and Nutrient
Cahul region).
Pollu-tion Prevention
through complex
monitoring of the quality
of environmt.

13

National NGO Projects
Country / NGO
Project Title and
Budget
Consultant comment
Name
subject
USD
Overall quality of project
Rating of environmental
Attractive for
(very good, good, average)
relevance to DRP issues
Commu-nication
(very high, high, average, no)
RO - Association
Clean Waters, with-out
9,000
Good: Preparing plans for manure
High: BAPs, and
Limited
for Ecology and
nutrients through
platforms in Iasi that will be built in
awareness raising
Sustainable
natural fertilisers.
surrounding villages. Link with RO World
Development Iasi Private and animal
Bank APC project
waste disposal
RO - Association
Preventing and
13,230
Good: A relatively simple project, not too
High: Local action planning, Yes high-lights
for Sustainable
Reducing Nutrient
ambitious with achievable objectives and
public awareness raising and how important is
Development,
Pollution from Agro-
linked to a follow-up project to test the
training are potentially useful effective
Slatina
Zoo Technical
concepts and practical actions further. An
tools to improve the commu-
communica-tion
Sources in the Olt
interesting example for other local NGOs
nication of good environ-
with farmers
River Basin
mental practice to farmers -
a key issue of the DRP
RO - Ecological
Co-operation to
9,600
Very Good: A straightforward project
High: Local action planning, Yes a nice
Club UNESCO Pro Reduce Nutrient
implemented by a well-known nature
capacity building amongst
example of
Natura, Bucharest
Pollution from
conservation organisation working in
local stakeholders and public partnership
Agricultural Sources
effective partnership with a regional
awareness-raising are
working to
in Ilfov County
government agency
important activities as the
address
basis for achieving long-term agricultural
reductions in agricultural
pollution at a
pollution
local level
RO - Alma-Ro
Clean Land, Rich
9,670
Good: A well formulated and implemented Very high: The World Bank No good
Association,
Man!
project that attempted to sustain the impact APCP project provided a
concept, but
Bucharest
of the World Bank APCP in Romania by
very interesting and useful
limited by

engaging the on-going interest and
model for communal mana-
"project fatigue"
commitment of local communities and
gement of animal waste that
of local people
authorities
is highly replicable in other
in Calarasi
regions of the lower DRB

14

4. Synthesis of the DRP SGP

The DRP's NGO Small Grants Programme has shown over the years that NGOs have only
limited possibilities to reduce nutrient and hazardous substances pollution but that their work is
in the overwhelming number of projects

· essential for raising the awareness of local, private and governmental stakeholders
about the pollution,
· relevant in terms of addressing some of the key environmental problems in the
Danube basin,
· solution-oriented in terms of proposing and communicating better practises,
· cost-efficient and sustainable in terms of the outputs and impacts achieved,
· Initiating successful pilot projects that can lead to larger projects.

The 2-steps grant selection process (after public call NGOs first submit a Concept Paper and
then short-listed NGOs work out a subsidized Project Proposal) that was developed prior to
Round 1 and revised prior to Round 2 by REC and the DRP office in consultation with the DEF
(Danube Environmental Forum) and international consultants was experienced and
commented as

· generally fair and correct
· relatively simple to follow and use for project submission
· relatively objective in the grant selection where always panel members from different
background (REC, NGOs, government, independent experts) were jointly evaluating
and deciding.

The DRP grants administration provided by the REC (central office for Regional grants and
Country Offices for National Grants) was experienced by the NGOs and DRP Consultants as

· in the load of administrative duties as justified and feasible
· in the REC's communication and guidance of NGOs as very supportive and helpful
· in the documentation (e.g. available for evaluation) as helpful (though not perfect).

As in most such programmes, there are various opportunities to improve such grant
programmes. Already prior to Round 1, such an assessment was used to revise and improve
the Round 2 grants programme; the effects and benefits could be experienced in Round 2 (e.g.
much better acknowledgement of UNDP/GEF-DRP). It is generally concluded by the DRP
Consultants that the DRP Small Grants Programme was assessed as successful, cost-
efficient and relevant for the key issues of the DRP and the ICPDR:

· pollution reduction,
· environmental awareness raising and
· stakeholder cooperation.

Results of the Round 2 Assessment in autumn 2006 showed that there are still some
opportunities to further upgrade future NGO grant programmes. These include:

· The minimum amount awarded to national NGO projects should be USD 5,000; the
maximum amount chosen for regional grants (USD 35,000-50,000) seems reasonable
and should not be exceeded.
· Grant selection committees should be very cautious with cutting of proposed
budgets. If such a decision has to be taken, the choices and implications should be
carefully assessed with the NGO(s).
· The net period that NGOs have available for execution should be no less than 12
months (national grants) resp. 18 months (regional grants). REC administrative time
needs for grant selection and money transfers should be limited to max. 2 months and
not affect the NGO capacities of project execution.
· In addition to administrative guidance and supervision, NGOs should be offered a
technical guidance related to both
o project strategies (what issue/problem to address and how, what to do when,
who to address/involve, how to sustain cooperation) and
o quality of execution (media work, scientific background/support, organisation of
events etc.).
Such technical guidance can hardly be provided by the REC and should cover +/- all
subjects addressed by the various NGO projects. The guidance should be provided
especially in the early project phase and used for project evaluation.
· NGOs should be strongly motivated to network both with other NGOs awarded in this
programme and with NGOs working outside the programme on the same subject, both
in the same country and abroad.

The reporting of successful NGO project achievements throughout and at the end of NGO
projects should be improved, especially for the purpose of communicating those achievements
to external audiences.

16

Annexes

ANNEX I
Detail Results from Assessment of Regional Projects

ANNEX II
Detail Results from Assessment of National Projects

ANNEX III Re-assessment of NGO Creative Project

Annex IV
Lists of all assessed national and regional NGO projects

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
17

ANNEX I Detail Results from Assessment of Regional Projects

Green Action
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental
DRP Verifier
+ CSED (BiH), DPPVN
21722 Strengthening NGO participation in EU -

issue
19 Sep. 2006
(SLO) & DEF SRB
WFD implementation in Sava River Basin
USD 50,000
WFD implementation
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information
The project served to increase the competence of NGOs in the Sava basin about the WFD, and to strengthen their
(objectives, progress of
involvement into the government activities (also in terms of public participation).
activities, action quality and
NGOs were lacking good contacts to key government stakeholders and involvement into WFD and Sava basin issues,
their environmental relevance
which were developing after the signing of the Sava Basin Framework Agreement and the recent opening of the Sava
in relation to DRP key issues)
Commission Secretariat in Zagreb.
The project also aims at strengthening the NGO image as a competent source of information for governments.
Implementation process
4 national NGOs workshops to educate about WFD (up to > 20 NGOs attending), in HR also presentation by Sava
Stakeholder cooperation,
Commission).
media work, relation to
10 Nov.: Regional workshop in Krapinske Toplice (HR) served to establish the new "Sava NGO Committee" (Sava
ICPDR, DEF, government
Commission, REC, ICPDR PS and DRP/Zinke also attending). Distribution of new brochure ("River Sava our common
heritage") about the Sava natural features and problems. . Green Action received official Observer status at Sava
Commission.
NGOs established good contacts to their national government bodies (e.g. by being regularly invited to WFD projects)
Local environment benefit Only indirectly!
of the NGO actions
Local institutional benefit
Green Action became the leader for Sava basin issues. More NGOs, especially in SRB and BiH were activated on WFD.
of the grant for the NGOs
REC grant selection and
Fine!
project administration
Communication results
Coloured brochure ("River Sava our common heritage" (4 Sava language + English; 24 pages, 2000 copies) with ISBN
number. Press release, local TV interview and other media reports about national workshops. Website.
Promotion of the DRP
Inside of brochure.
Attractiveness for DRP
High!
Other comment

18

Holocen/HU
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental
DRP Verifier
+ Dialogue /HU
21719 "Barriers and Bridges": Barriers to

issue
5 Oct. 2006
(+ Silvanus/RO)
Waste, Nutrients and Chemicals, Bridges for
USD 28,000
Community awareness raising

Communities, Sectors and Information
on environment protection
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information
This project aims at cooperation between schools, municipalities, authorities, the business sector and NGOs in jointly
(objectives, progress of activities,
making steps towards WFD implementation at community level. The special character of this project is the cooperation
action quality and their envir.
with a social NGO (Dialogue) and the concrete work at the very local scale (villages, schools) in both countries, bridged by
relevance in relation to DRP key
few joint activities.
issues)
Implementation process
The project firstly addressed environmental pollution and rural tourism. Results from 2 surveys of local people from 8
Stakeholder cooperation, media villages (150 people 118 replies!) and local government (19 replies) in Sancraiu/RO were presented in a workshop in
work, relation to ICPDR, DEF,
May, followed up in 4 villages by a training (35 participants) on joint community building (local pollution spots).
government
In Hungary on Hernad river (3 villages) and Vadasz creek (7 villages), also 150 people were addressed. The related
seminar and training was held in November, including 15 RO participants (incl. kids). It served also to present overall
project results (surveys, children's water monitoring, draft RBM plans, information about the Organica WWTP (see
www.korte-organica.hu) and a field trip.
Environment monitoring of surface water and wells (2-4 times/month) were done with aqua test and pond exploring kits in
5 HU and 2 RO schools (at age of 10-14). Holocen instructed on the use of these kits. Results are reported in info sheets.
A set of powerpoint presentations/lectures (4 on water pollution) is given to 17 schools (Miskolc region) and other nature
infos are available on www.holocen.hu
A school competition was organised since may in 17 schools (4 children per group in 2 age classes: This includes 6
stations on nature interpretation and art master; 9 winners were invited to Baja to participate in a new art competition and a
Danube boat trip. The winner was invited to a summer camp. In RO, a summer camp was held for one week for 25 kids.
Frosch detergent sample packages were given to 25 households in both HU and RO areas.
Local environment benefit of
Directly in some local villages, indirectly in the entire project areas.
NGO actions
Local governments employed workers to clean village sites.
Public composting sites were set up in the school yards in each village.
Local institutional benefit of
Less to Holocen, more to Dialogue and Silvanus
grant for NGOs
REC grant selection and
All went fine and was easy to apply.
project administration
The 7000 USD not covered by DRP came from various sources or in-kind.
Communication results
Fliers on composting, home etiquette, water use in RO and HU; CDs and transparencies on the lectures.
Few articles in local newspapers.
Promotion of the DRP
OK!
Attractiveness for DRP
Small
Other comment
Project info: see http://www.holocen.hu/rc_EN.htm PPT presentations can be found at
www.holocen.hu/programmes/environmentaleducation

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
19

SLOVENIA
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental
DRP Verifier
Storklja/SI
21727 Preserving the water by promoting

issue
19-20 Sep. 2006
Roda/HR
diapers friendly for earth and baby
USD 35,000
Waste management and

Alexander Zinke
related water pollution
NGO project information
The project follows up from a similar one granted at national level in the DRP Round 1 (2004/2005), as it was recommended
(objectives, progress of
after the 2005 assessment.
activities, action quality and
The lead NGO has a junior partner (RODA) is Zagreb/HR, which gets only 8% of funds. Most action is, however, in HR where
their environmental relevance
this topic is much less developed and promoted than in SI. Use of cotton diapers is in a very early state in HR: NGOs have no
in relation to the DRP key
access to birth places (clinics) but growing contacts to nurses. Parenting courses at municipal level are sponsored by the HIPP
issues)
company.
Main action is the production of a DVD that will be disseminated mainly in Croatia.
Implementation process
Both NGOs meet every 3 months to coordinate the project.
Stakeholder cooperation,
STORKLJA: DVD (50% of the DRP funds!) was produced in HR and SI languages jointly with a professional team and
media work, relation to
disseminated in November. At least 300 copies were produced but the NGO plans to burn up to over 1,000 copies in 2006.
ICPDR, DEF, government
Main public activities are happening in HR. Since Sept. RODA in HR has a new office to demonstrate the proper use of
diapers. Web forum with 5-7000 visits/day! The DVD will be shown in health centers and libraries.
A web questionnaire was responded by 1400 people: 200 use diapers.
Local environment benefit Outputs indicated in grant application form are unrealistic. Over time, the environmental benefit (reduced waste) will come.
of the NGO actions
Local institutional benefit
RODA (HR name for stork) is a young and small NGO (though 350 members, 78 active) but already well recognised in HR. It is
of the grant(s) for the NGO
here profiting from the experience and support of Storklja (well known in SI). Grant has much improved the awareness and
recognition of the NGO work, it has also resulted in new experiences and lessons important for the future work.
REC grant selection and
SGP process and terms were very clear, cooperation is getting better; communication, organization and the way of work is
project administration
very professional and very dedicated to each NGO.
The project was co-funded (30%) from the commune of LJ and the Ministry for Environment.
Communication results
Press releases. Reports in local media (incl. TV), e.g. Osijek; regular radio programme. www.storklja.si www.roda.hr
In HR a national TV program was under negotiation.
Promotion of the DRP
On DVD
Attractiveness for DRP
Limited! Good project but hard to relate to DRP core issues.
Other comment

20

Association for Integrated
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
Rural Development (BG)
Cross-sectoral Cooperation for Good

26 Sept (BG) & 9
and Romanian
Water Quality Management on Lower
USD 29 970
Water pollution by agriculture
Oct. (RO), 2006
Ornithological Society
Danube Farms (ref: 21724)
Mark Redman
(RO)
NGO project information The overall aim of the project was the long-term reduction of water pollution caused by agriculture in the Lower Danube basin
(objectives, progress of
that has been caused by the combination of:
activities, action quality
· inappropriate use of fertilisers and storage of manure;
and their environmental
· insufficient co-operation and co-ordination between the different institutions involved in land and water management, and;
relevance in relation to the · inadequate awareness amongst farmers and the general public about issues and problems relating to environmental
DRP key issues)
protection including soil, water and biodiversity.
In order to achieve this aim, the project had the following objectives:
· to provide a model for good water quality management on two model farms - one in Pleven County in Bulgaria and the
second in Braila County in Romania;
· to contribute to policy development and the creation of more sustainable institutional conditions regarding agriculture and
water quality issues;
· establish a cross-sectoral, multi-stakeholder platform for addressing the relationship between agriculture and water
quality in the Lower Danube Basin.
Although highly relevant to DRP key issues, these aims were very ambitious for a 12 month implementation period and
immediately suffered practical delays with establishment of the model farms and organisation of initial seminars due to the
flooding experienced in early 2006. Nonetheless, a number of activities were started and implemented to a high technical
quality. However, the overall impact of the project ultimately proved to be limited by problems with project management.

The project was prepared by WWF in Bulgaria, but since neither the BG nor RO WWF offices were legal entities at the time
of project application, it was not eligible to apply in their own name. Two "partner" NGOs were therefore used - Association
for Integrated Rural Development (in BG) and Romanian Ornithological Society (ROS) and upon initial assessment this
appeared a reasonable partnership. For example, the ROS appeared particularly interested and committed to broadening
the scope of its activities and building capacity to address agricultural pollution and water quality issues. However, it was
also apparent that a) communication between the two partners was not functioning effectively, and b) there were problems
with project management by the Romanian partner that were contributing to further significant delays in project
implementation.
Unfortunately a subsequent monitoring visit by REC also revealed serious financial and management discrepancies by the
ROS that resulted in the RO component of the project being closed in late 2006. This was regrettable since the RO
component had both considerable relevance to DRP key issues and, with technical support from WWF RO, the potential to
make a useful impact at local and national level but clearly the project management problems were unacceptable.
Implementation process
As already noted, this project was very ambitious for a 12 month period but the activities planned in both countries were
Stakeholder cooperation,
logical and potentially effective through implementation of the following key steps:
media work, relation to
· Situation analysis for the target regions in Romania and Bulgaria successfully completed, including the screening
ICPDR, DEF, government
and identification of model farms that were relevant to the specific conditions of each region;
DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
21

Association for Integrated
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
Rural Development (BG)
Cross-sectoral Cooperation for Good

26 Sept (BG) & 9
and Romanian
Water Quality Management on Lower
USD 29 970
Water pollution by agriculture
Oct. (RO), 2006
Ornithological Society
Danube Farms (ref: 21724)
Mark Redman
(RO)
· Preparation of EU "information packs" for both countries all relevant information collected on EU legislation and
adapted both to the regional/local context and the DRP concept of Best Agricultural Practice (BAP). The resulting
documents were disseminated at the stakeholder meetings and the Romanian partners also uploaded them to their
project website: www.clicknet.ro/danube (various maps, photographs, presentations and a short description of the project
may also be found there);
· Stakeholder meetings first meetings successfully organised on 20-21 March (BG) and 25 May (RO) with the support
and participation of the respective Ministries of Agriculture and Environment, national agricultural extension services,
local governors, NGO representatives, farmers and farmers' associations (e.g. a total of 85 people in BG). Both
meetings were reported to establish the basis for good on-going co-operation;
· Preparation of model farms and commence monitoring an on-going activity. Farms were selected in Pleven and
Braila counties according to clearly defined common criteria and considerable work was undertaken with the farmers to
orientate them towards the project and their function as model farms. For example, a high priority in BG was to make the
farmer "legal" with the relevant registration papers, interpretation of veterinary and environmental regulations etc.;
· Develop and present recommendations to relevant authorities this was successfully completed in both countries
through active participation of various official representatives in discussions during the first stakeholder meetings;
· Further stakeholder workshops 3 training workshops were organised for farmers in Pleven municipalities (BG) during
the period 2-7 June 2006 entitled "Financial opportunities for development of environmentally-friendly agricultural
practices and activities". A further training seminar was organized on 26 June 2006 in partnership with the Braila County
Council (RO) to inform local majors about the potential impact of EU legislation (CAP, WFD etc.) upon Danube water
quality. A final stakeholder meeting was planned to be held in Braila in November 2006 it was hoped that this would
provide the opportunity for networking with other DRP-SGP projects;
· Promotion and dissemination - articles related to project activities and seminars were published in the local Newspaper
"Obiectiv" in Braila (published on the internet), whilst in Pleven the seminars attracted the interest of 7 local newspapers,
2 radio representatives and a local TV station.
Local environment
The aims of the project were very ambitious and with the delays in implementation it seems unlikely that there will have been
benefit of the NGO
any significant short-term environmental benefits. However, the technical materials produced and seminars/workshops
actions
organised were of a high quality and will have contributed significantly to raising the awareness and understanding of key
local stakeholders this will inevitably contribute to long-term environmental benefits, especially when financial instruments
become available after EU accession for investment in manure management and the encouragement of more
environmentally-friendly farming practices (e.g. organic farming).
Local institutional
Project funding undoubtedly helped to build the capacity of both partner NGOs regarding their understanding of the technical
benefit of the grant for the and EU regulatory issues relating to water pollution by agriculture. Despite the problems with project mis-management
NGO
outlined above, this was particularly useful for the ROS who have a stated commitment to wider environmental issues beyond
simply the conservation of bird habitats and species, and were very happy to have the opportunity to work at a local level on

22

BULGARIA/ROMANIA/
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
MOLDOVA
Best Agricultural Practice in my Farm:
USD 34 978

Black Sea NGO Network
NGOs, Farmers, Specialists Working

Water pollution by agriculture
24 Sept (BG) & 11
(BG), Earth Friends (RO)
together for BAP in Bulgaria, Romania
(+ USD 1 698
Oct (RO) 2006

and Eco Counselling
and Moldova (ref: 21728)
match-funding)
Mark Redman
Centre (MD)
NGO project information The project was implemented in 6 rural municipalities in the Lower DRB in Bulgaria (Silistra and Dobrich), Romania (Galati
(objectives, progress of
and Bacau) and Moldova (Cahul and neighbouring municipalities). These regions all share common problems regarding the
activities, action quality
impact of agricultural activities on the environment, but obviously have contrasting regulatory frameworks, including in BG and
and their environmental
RO where the transposition of EU legislation has proceeded at different speeds and in slightly different directions. The overall
relevance in relation to the aim of the project was to introduce at municipality level the concept of Best Agricultural Practice (BAP) as developed and
promoted by the DRP a concept very new to most experts, NGOs, farmers and other stakeholders in the region.
DRP key issues)
In order to achieve this aim, the project had the following objectives:
· To develop understanding of the concept and requirements of BAP at a local level in BG, RO and MD
· To promote the application of BAP in the current agricultural practices of 150 - 200 local stakeholders
· To stimulate the interest of the local media in the DRP, BAP, ecosystem approach, organic production and trans-
boundary cooperation in target countries
· To strengthen multi-stakeholder cooperation and promote exchange and networking locally, nationally and regionally.
These aims and objectives were highly relevant to DRP issues and the project was well-formulated with realistic objectives for
the available time-frame and budget. This assessment is based upon visits to the Bulgarian and Romanian partners. No visit
was made to Moldova and information on the activities of the in Eco Counselling Centre in Cahul were sparse although it
was noted by the Romanian partner that co-operation could have been better.
Implementation process The activities planned in the partner countries were implemented through the following key steps:
Stakeholder cooperation,
· Project launch launch events were organised by each partner during February 2006 on 8 February in Bulgaria (50
media work, relation to
people attending), 15 February in Romania (50 people attending) and 10 February in Moldova. All events received good
ICPDR, DEF, government
media coverage even though they were organised shortly after the worst period of flooding and GAP/BAP was not
initially perceived as a high priority. An important element of the strategy for launching the project was the production of
various promotional materials colourful posters were produced in Bulgaria and Romania, a calendar and caps in
Moldova, personalised agenda notebooks in Romania and t-shirts in Bulgaria;
· Preparation and exchange of information during February 2006 the lead partner (Black Sea NGO Network) prepared
a summary in English of the Bulgarian Code of Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) and a Fact Sheet on the DRP concept of
Best Agricultural Practice (BAP). These were circulated to the other partners as a "template" for information exchange
and during March May 2006 the other partners prepared and exchanged summaries of their national Codes of GAP and
other tools for supporting sustainable agriculture in their own countries. Relevant materials were also translated into the
native language and distributed to the local media to stimulate interest in the project and the key issue of agriculture and
water quality;
· Training courses two training courses were organised in each country for farmers and local experts to develop their
understanding of the concept of BAP and to strengthen their capacity to support nutrient reduction activities and trans-

24

BULGARIA/ROMANIA/
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
MOLDOVA
Best Agricultural Practice in my Farm:
USD 34 978

Black Sea NGO Network
NGOs, Farmers, Specialists Working

Water pollution by agriculture
24 Sept (BG) & 11
(BG), Earth Friends (RO)
together for BAP in Bulgaria, Romania
(+ USD 1 698
Oct (RO) 2006

and Eco Counselling
and Moldova (ref: 21728)
match-funding)
Mark Redman
Centre (MD)
boundary cooperation. The main criteria used for selecting the participants were their potential to a) disseminate
information through their professional occupation and/or b) directly apply the concept of GAP/BAP. The training was
organised as follows: Dobrich (BG) (22 February 2006) 44 participants; Silistra (BG) (22 February 2006) 29
participants; Galati (RO) (11 March 2006) 41 participants; Bacau (RO) (8 April 2006) 38 participants; Cahul (MD) (5
April 2006) 26 participants; Cantemir (MD) (12 May 2006) 31 participants. The total number of participants was 221
(almost 40% more than anticipated in the original project proposal). In all countries the training was reported to stimulate
farmers and local experts to seek more information and the advice of other professionals. A total of 12 journalists
participated in the 6 training courses;
· GAP/BAP Booklet 500 booklets (28pp, A5, full colour format) were prepared and distributed by each partner in their
native language. The contents and design of each booklet were decided by the partners according to local context for
example, the lead partner focused on the storage and use of manure by integrating the guidelines on manure
management from the DRP Phase 1 with key points from the Bulgarian Code of GAP prepared by the Ministry of
Agriculture;
· Media events each partner was responsible for engaging with the local media and organising publicity events and
activities to highlight project topics and achievements (many of which are outlined above). For example, Earth Friends in
Romania organised local events in March, April and June to correspond with Water Day, Earth Day and World
Environment Day. Additionally, a media competition was organised in each target region to coincide with Danube Day
(June 29 2006) this attracted 10 entrants in Bulgaria, 2 in Romania and an unreported number in Moldova. The winners
received diplomas and were invited to join the cross-border study visits (see below);
· Cross-border study visits the first study visit took place from 8-11 June 2006 and involved 15 Romanian and 3
Moldovan farmers, experts and media representatives visiting Bulgaria (11 of the Romanian participants had never
travelled abroad before). The group visited a total of 4 farms in the Silistra and and Plovdiv regions all of which had a
specific interest in soil conservation and water protection, including 3 that use organic production methods. The visits
stimulated much interest and discussion as one participant concluded in her travel report: "the visits showed us that we
can practice an agriculture that is friendly to the environment and can offer us both moral and material satisfaction". The
trip was covered by the Bulgarian and Romanian local media with 4 publications and news on the local TV and radio
channels. The second study tour from Bulgaria and Moldova to Romania was organised for mid-October 2006 and
included a visit to the World Bank APC project in Calarasi;
· Establishment of local networks - in addition to the network established between the partners, a number of smaller
networks also quickly developed within the project in response to the activities undertaken. These networks offer the
potential for further work and co-operation. For example, contacts and networking were significantly improved in
Romania at a) the local level with local government officials from Galati and Bacau county visiting each other and Earth
Friends co-operating closely on new project proposals with the county office of the national agricultural advisory service,
DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
25

BULGARIA/ROMANIA/
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
MOLDOVA
Best Agricultural Practice in my Farm:
USD 34 978

Black Sea NGO Network
NGOs, Farmers, Specialists Working

Water pollution by agriculture
24 Sept (BG) & 11
(BG), Earth Friends (RO)
together for BAP in Bulgaria, Romania
(+ USD 1 698
Oct (RO) 2006

and Eco Counselling
and Moldova (ref: 21728)
match-funding)
Mark Redman
Centre (MD)
and; b) the international level with the exchange of information and know-how between the Bujoro Research Institute in
Galati (RO) and the University of Agriculture in Plovdiv (BG).
Local environment
No direct local environmental benefits, but much potential for indirect long-term benefits due to the improved awareness of
benefit of the NGO
and understanding about GAP, BAP and WFD amongst all stakeholders including farmers, local communities, NGOs etc.
actions
This is particularly important in Moldova where the concepts were previously unknown and the level of awareness of the
problems was very low.
The project set a target of modifying the agricultural practices 150-200 local farmers this is impossible to verify, but it is clear
that a significantly greater number than this were aware of the project and likely to have been influenced by it's activities and
outputs.
Local institutional
The main benefits for the partner NGOs were: a) enhanced networking with central and local government, agricultural
benefit of the grant for the advisory services, research institutes, farmers and media; b) greater awareness and technical understanding about GAP,
NGOs
BAP and WFD, and; c) increased profile in the local media, including TV, radio, press and internet.
In Romania, the institutional benefits also apply to the local offices of the national agricultural advisory service that actively
participated in the project. According to the Director of the Galati office, "We learnt a lot from working on this project with
Earth Friends and now want to share this experience with our colleagues in other county offices".
REC grant selection and No problems, only positive comments, reported by the partner organisations
project administration
Communication results
Engagement of all partners with the media was excellent throughout the project. Media contacts were kept aware of and
involved in activities with continual emphasis upon the regional nature of the project, its importance within the larger DRP and
relevance to wider environmental issues. In addition to the channels of communication already described above a project
website was maintained by the lead partner: www.bseanetwork.org/Project%20farm.htm
Promotion of the DRP
High DRP and REC logos clearly presented on all project communications and publications
Attractiveness for DRP
Very high lots of examples of good practice within the project for reinforcing key messages originating from the DRP
(notably the concept of Best Agricultural Practice) that were adapted to local context
Other comment
· An interesting lesson from this regional project is the way that it successfully built upon a national project undertaken by
the Black Sea NGO Network under Round 1 of the DRP-SGP. Entitled "Ecoaccent: Plant Growing in Dobrudzha", the
national project involved field plots to demonstrate the environmental and economic benefits of good agricultural practice;
field visits and seminars for farmers, local experts, advisers, and NGO activists, and; training for journalists on relevant
legislation.
· None of the partners were aware of any activities undertaken in their country under Phase 2 of the agricultural
components (outputs 1.2 & 1.3) of the DRP.

26

ANNEX II Detail Results from Assessment of National Projects

SLOVENIA
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Institute for Environmental
The Effective Protection of Water in Rural

20 Sep. 06
Protection Promotion
Areas in Podonavje, Using Ecoremediation
USD 10,000
Water pollution from agriculture
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information This new and small NGO (related to the Maribor university) addresses the use of natural processes for the protection and
(objectives, progress of
restoration of damaged environment (so-called the "ecoremediation" = ERM) via e.g. better farming and change of certain
activities, action quality
lifestyle in SI. It focuses on the Podravje area in eastern SI (Drava lowland between Maribor and Ormoz) and introduces ERM
and their environmental
techniques to local farmers: By a means of partner network and various activities, the use of fertilisers and pesticides shall be
relevance in relation to the reduced in the Drava lowlands whose big gravel deposits easily dry up and its ground- and drinking water are polluted (in 1989
wells had to be closed).
DRP key issues)
Other examples for ERM are the cleaning of soils (polluted by heavy metals) with certain plants or of the Ormoz waste tip
(recycling of leakage waters - EU model project).
Implementation process
Network of 20 partner institutions set up.
Stakeholder cooperation,
Media campaign in May with newspapers and TV; dissemination of colour postcards (4 types explaining ERM) to households,
media work, relation to
schools etc.
ICPDR, DEF, government Symposium on 13 June explained ERM (science and its application); booklet (200 copies; 48 pages) and CD of all lectures; 35
participants.
Education Course "Eco-manager" will be offered at the university as a 2 semester post-graduate programme on applied
ecology (3 theoretical topics + practical education e.g. decentralised WWTPs) for all environment-related companies
Farm advisory services (October) to improve use of chemicals
Publication of the booklet "ERM for better environment protection" presents 7 examples of ERM in the Drava area (1,300
copies 300 from DRP funds)
School visits to inform about ERM since September and to initiate practical activities.
Input into the development of the school curricula (environment is one of the volunteer subjects) by the universities of Maribor,
LJ and Koper. From November on, a new faculty of ERM was established in Celje (Technopolis at former industry site).
Local environment
Directly (farmers) and indirectly (industry managers, schools, local public)
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
DRP funds helped to develop the young NGO and secure media reports
benefit
REC grant selection and Excellent support by REC!
project administration
Communication results
Media reports (articles; 1 hour weekly radio magazine over 6 months); 4,000 postcards (4types); coloured symposium booklet
and CD, and ERM booklet
Promotion of the DRP
On postcards, in symposium and ERM booklets and CD
Attractiveness for DRP
High! Impressive number of partners, activities and outputs.
Other comment

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
27

SLOVENIA
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
ICRO
Individual Waste Water Cleaning Systems for

20 Sep. 2006
Households and Farms in Dispersed Settlements
USD 10,000
Small WWTPs in rural areas
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project in a rural area not far from Ljubljana addresses sewage collection and treatment in dispersed settlements. The
(objectives, progress of
Volcji potok area (communes of Domzale, Krammik and Lukovica) a potential landscape park and protected area - lacks
activities, action quality
any sewage system and faces water pollution problems (drinking water is bottled). The relevant legislation is still missing;
and their environmental
septic tanks and cesspits are no appropriate solution (often illegally emptied); small villages usually do not cooperate to share
relevance in relation to the costs of sewage management; farmers are often not ready to admit their pollution and there are not many treatment
techniques.
DRP key issues)
The NGO solution is to identify pilot areas to demonstrate better action and to use advisors to multiply the effect. Local
stakeholders are addressed by workshops, publications, media and school activities.
The project builds up on the Round 1 DRP grant successfully addressing teachers and pupils with 2 brochures about "Water
Detectives" and "How the river cleans itself".
Implementation process
Cooperation with various stakeholders, e.g. Farm Advisory Agency: one-day training on household sewage and manure
Stakeholder cooperation,
management. Information provided also via internet (usually checked by farmers!): Link to a special page managed by the
media work, relation to
Institute for Sanitation Technology (university).
ICPDR, DEF, government Production of an information brochure and a technical plan on sewage management needs.
Organisation of a workshop in November (some 30 participants).
Research project with children.
Local environment
Only indirect over the next years
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
The NGO is well known already from school education activities but could with this project extend its image and contacts.
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and REC cooperation is fine! The Logframe creates confusion and is not really useful for project execution.
project administration
Communication results
Brochure (2000 copies)
Promotion of the DRP
Brochure,
Attractiveness for DRP
Medium
Other comment

28

SLOVENIA
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Association Storklja
Preserving the Water by Promoting the

20 Sep.2006
Production and Use of Phosphate-free Detergents
USD 10,000
Water pollution
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project addresses the use of (phosphate-free) detergents by consumers and the related water quality in NE Slovenia.
(objectives, progress of
Main subject of the NGO is mother service (see the Regional Grant project about diapers!), which is very weakly developed in
activities, action quality and
SI.
their environmental relevance The NGO works through its 3 centres (Maribor = 5 years old, Ljubljana = 2 years old and Velenje = new) as well as through
in relation to the DRP key
doctor centres, pediatric clinics, technical schools, booths at communal events and its website.
issues)
The NGO developed a questionnaire, a website and a brochure, promoted its topics via media and public events.
Implementation process
In July 10,000(!!) copies of a coloured leaflet were printed and distributed all over SI.
Stakeholder cooperation,
In the Storklja centers, lectures, trainings and advisory services are provided (2 programmes every day!).
media work, relation to
The questionnaire was distributed before and after the campaign: over 300 responses were received (the evaluation was not
ICPDR, DEF, government
done at the time of the interview).
The NGO is well linked to other NGOs
Local environment
Indirect (slowly reducing use of conventional detergents).
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
Grant has much further improved the awareness and recognition of its work. The NGO has already a very good standing and
benefit of grant for NGO
is well networked with other stakeholders (communes, medical services, etc.) but with this project it could add a new topic to
its activities.
REC grant selection and No problem!
project administration
Communication results
2 newspapers were involved, webpage and leaflet
Promotion of the DRP
Webpage, leaflet.
Attractiveness for DRP
Medium (excellent communication works!)
Other comment

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
29

SLOVENIA
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Society "Krnica"
Underground Water and Farmers

21 Sep. 2006
USD 10,000
Agricultural pollution
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project is located in southern SLO near the CRO border (Bela Krajina, capital Novo Mesto), specifically in the Lahinja
(objectives, progress of
Landscape Park (Natura 2000 site). This is a 200 ha large complex of forests and fields hosting natural and cultural
activities, action quality
monuments in a karst landscape of the upper Lahinja river. It is managed by RIC, a public institution representing the
and their environmental
municipalities of Crnomelj and Semic, which aims at developing tourism and small entrepreneurship (also preparation for EU
relevance in relation to the Leader and Interreg projects of the "Valis Colapis Euregio" = Kupa/Kopla valley). RIC also serves as tourist information
centre and tourism agency for Bela Krajina.
DRP key issues)
Project objective is to raise awareness of the management needs of the special wetland site "Nerajski luge" (5 ha), to educate
and demonstrate improved water (pollution) management and to establish new stakeholder cooperation.
Implementation process
After the project presentations (March 2006: gain full stakeholder support) to 45(!) local farmers and the next day to 20 local
Stakeholder cooperation,
people, 3 educational workshops were held in April (on biodiversity conservation in the landscape park; education of local
media work, relation to
guides about the countryside heritage; eco-farming the park; each 20-25 participants) as well as 3 field activities (mowing of
ICPDR, DEF, government
the overgrown wetland with 60 persons on 22 July; in autumn: cutting of alder trees at the wetland and clearing of river banks
at the Lahinja spring);
The project was regularly communicated via local media (radio, TV and newspapers) and via a leaflet "Underground water
and farmers" (2000 copies in SLO and ENG).
The core area is managed by 45 farmers who have to stop fertilising the meadows.
Local environment
Direct restoration of key nature sites, strongly involving local people who, in the long term, should also reduce nutrient
benefit of NGO actions
loading.
Local institutional
Obvious success of stakeholder cooperation
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and No problem!
project administration
Communication results
Multiple at local level.
Promotion of the DRP
Nice PPT presentation; T-shirt "Mower of Nerajski lugi"
Attractiveness for DRP
High! Even though this is a small-scale action, it shows how to activate local stakeholder awareness and involvement
Other comment
RIC is an excellent project management body and no real NGO but does excellent stakeholder networking.
Mission included a field trip to Nerajski lugi site, with managed area and alders to be cut; meeting with local handcraft person.

30

Croatia
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue
DRP Verifier
Brod Environmental

Associat. "Earth" (BEUZ);
DRP II 01-05 Cooperation for a Cleaner Sava
USD 11,950
Slavonski Brod wastewater
8 Nov 2006
Slavonski Brod Municipality:
management

Environment Department;
Rayka Hauser
Sewerage Company
NGO project information The project's objective is to promote stakeholder cooperation towards the reduction of Sava pollution from Slavonski Brod
(objectives, progress of
municipal wastewaters (over 60,000 inhabitants) through: raising awareness, sensitising local stakeholders and creating a
activities, action quality
sense of urgency in order to speed up the ongoing WWTP planning and the search of funding; creating a model for
and their environmental
cooperation and dialogue among stakeholders in the process of WWTP planning; as well as lobbying for a tertiary treatment
relevance in relation to the stage.
In the course of project implementation, two more major point source polluters were identified in the vicinity of Slavonski Brod
DRP key issues)
and project objectives evolved to include cooperation with these polluters towards a solution for wastewater treatment.

Relevance to DRP key issues: pollution reduction from municipal and farming sources, awareness raising, models for
stakeholder dialogue and looking for solutions together with polluters.
Implementation process Until the date of the evaluation interview, the following activities were implemented: a media campaign presenting the project
Stakeholder cooperation,
issues (local print articles, local television and radio programmes), public survey on awareness levels, and a workshop for
media work, relation to
local and regional authorities and NGOs on "Cooperation for a Cleaner Sava" presenting the WFD, the draft WWTP concept
ICPDR, DEF, government and the Sava Commission. Additional activities: identification of point-source pollution sources in the county; selection of a
sampling site (Mrsunja River downstream from a large scale pig farm), carrying out of two series of water chemical and
biological analyses together with the Public Health Institute; initiating a dialogue with the polluter. A second major polluter
(poultry slaughterhouse) was also identified and a dialogue on technological solutions initiated.
Remaining activities: include two more series of chemical and biological analyses of water quality, and a final workshop "Sava
our Common River" on 12 December 2006.
Cooperation with: Sava Commission, NGOs, local government and water authorities, identified point source polluters. No
cooperation with (unaware of) parallel relevant DRP activities and potentially strong partners in Croatia, e.g. Club PBZ (see
next SGP project matrix) or the Water Forum Demonstration Project implemented by Green Osijek under DRP Component
3.4.
Change of project leader resulted in a 2-month delay of the project start.
Change of project scope after initial findings (addition of further activities, slight modification of originally planned ones)
Local environment
Initiated cooperation with major polluters and expressed good will to work toward wastewater treatment solutions (i.e.
benefit of the NGO
potential positive environmental impact beyond the project's completion); model for cooperation.
actions
Raised awareness of relevant local and county authorities about the need to speed up construction of a WWTP (i.e. potential
positive environmental impact beyond the project's completion); model for cooperation, public awareness raising.
Local institutional
Raised profile through media work and stakeholder cooperation.
benefit of grant for NGO
Strengthened and newly established partnerships with local authorities, Sava Basin NGOs and with polluters.
Plans for several follow-up activities stemming from the project.
DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
31

Croatia
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue
DRP Verifier
Assoc. of Food Technolo-

gists, Biotechnologists and
DRP II 02-05 Informing the public about the
USD 15,000
BAT for industrial wastewater
5 Oct 2006
Nutritionists (Club PBN);
advantages of industrial wastewater
treatment.
Rayka Hauser
Food and Biotechnology
treatment technologies (environmental and
Faculty, Zagreb;
economic aspects)
Croatian Centre for Cleaner
Product.; Sivicon i Vicos AD
NGO project information The project objective is to educate the public, industries, governmental institutions and interested organisations about national
(objectives, progress of
and EU legal requirements and state-of-the-art technologies for industrial wastewater treatment, with a focus on several types
activities, action quality
of food and chemical industries. Activities to this end include: organisation of specialized lectures on various legal,
and their environmental
technological, environmental management and economic aspects (including case studies of selected factories); round table
relevance in relation to the discussions with industry, government and non-government representatives; demonstration of equipment for water quality
control and biological wastewater treatment; publication / handbook on new wastewater treatment technologies; as well as
DRP key issues)
technical assistance to interested companies for the planning of wastewater treatment solutions.
Relevance to DRP key issues: industrial pollution reduction (especially interesting because of a constructive approach to
providing concrete technical expertise to polluters), education of stakeholders and the public to exercise pressure.
Implementation process Lectures: The IPPC Directive's approach to regulating industrial environmental impacts; IPPC Directive and implications for the
Stakeholder cooperation,
food and chemical industries; Case studies of sugar factories in Germany and the Osijek Sugar Factory; State-of-the-art
media work, relation to
technologies for industrial wastewater treatment and their advantages; Case studies of economic and environmental aspects of
ICPDR, DEF, government cleaner production at the Lura Dairy Factory; Results from the survey of drinking water quality in Zagreb. Two equipment
exhibitions in Zagreb (under preparation at the time of interview). Publication of handbook (draft at the time of interview).
Provision of technical assistance to the Labud detergent factory (upon the request of their biotechnologist) for environmental
management planning (on-going at the time of interview).
NGOs were invited from contacts provided by REC but turnout was very low. A change of strategy was planned for the
remaining (at the time of interview) lectures to motivate NGOs participation through contacting them directly. High interest from
industries with both positive and negative reactions, including heated discussions on new and outdated wastewater treatment
technologies, and requests for cooperation and assistance following the lectures.
Local environment
Potential future introduction of environmental technologies and improved environmental performance of some factories.
benefit of NGO actions
Increased technical expertise of pressure groups to support lobbying efforts.
Local institutional
Raised profile of the organisation as a source of technical expertise to industries; specific cooperation initiated with several
benefit of grant for NGO
industrial factories, possibly to be followed-up after the project's end
Increased professional qualification of members of the organisation (industrial technologists throughout Croatia).
REC grant selection and Well managed selection and implementation process, no problems with funding and transfers.
project administration
Communication results
Press release before each lecture and announcements in Vjesnik newspaper; online news articles; DVD records of all lectures
and discussions; CD Powerpoint presentations. Limited media coverage despite communications efforts.
Promotion of the DRP
DRP logo on all invitations and reference to DRP funding in articles and press releases. Logo will also be on the publication.
DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
33

Croatia
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue
DRP Verifier
Europe House Vukovar,

Biopa Osijek, Organic
DRP II 03-05 Promotion of ecological and
USD 11,970
Promotion of organic farming
2 Nov. 06

Farms Zrno, Goran & Mlini organic agriculture: Phase II
and marketing of products
Rayka Hauser
NGO project information The project aims to stop agricultural land degradation and reduce soil and water pollution through promoting organic agri-
(objectives, progress of
culture in the Vukovar Region. Implemented activities according to plan: practical training for farmers on methods of organic
activities, action quality
agriculture (lectures, workshops, demonstration field visits), provision of assistance for reaching markets and certification
and their environmental
(linking farmers with health food producers in Croatia and abroad, promoting the establishment of organic farmers'
relevance in relation to the associations, enabling the year-round sale of organic produce at the eco-stand of the Vukovar open market), and raising
consumer awareness about the environmental and health benefits of organic production (printed materials, information and
DRP key issues)
tasting of organic produce at the Vukovar open market, education of school children through school eco-fields, lessons and
competitions).
Relevance to DRP key issues: reduction of pollution and land degradation, public awareness raising about polluting activities.
Implementation process Excellent cooperation among project implementation partners: two NGOs and three established organic producers. Project
Stakeholder cooperation,
content was largely defined by beneficiaries themselves (this is a follow-up from a SGP Round I project, which focused on
media work, relation to
theoretical lectures for farmers). At the request of farmers, Phase II included more practical and expert training on organic
ICPDR, DEF, government agriculture methods for a larger number of farmers, study visits to organic farms, assistance for certification and reaching
markets. Project partners worked with authorities (Vukovar Development Fund) to ensure better access to governmental
financial support for starting organic agriculture (about 23 farmers in the project area will get such support; with possibly 1/3
eventually being certified). Promotion materials were distributed to farmer advisory services at the county offices. One of the
organisations (Biopa Osijek) is also providing ongoing advisory services for organic agriculture. Vukovar Eco-Association was
established, which will offer daily organic produce at the Vukovar open market, as well as through other routes. Contacts
were established with health food producers for possible supply. Consumers were targeted through eco-stands at markets
and fairs information provision as well as questionnaires to find out about consumer knowledge and interest. Regular media
coverage led to increased interest and visits to eco-stands; promotion materials were produced and distributed: posters,
leaflets, brochures.
Project leaders will look for possibilities for follow up activities due to the increased interest by farmers.
Local environment
No direct local environmental effect at present but significant potential if new farmers convert to organic production (target for
benefit of NGO actions
about 7-8 farmers in the coming year, a further increase in interest and plans for follow-up activities).
Local institutional
Stronger cooperation and increased credibility of involved NGOs with a large number of farmers in the Vukovar Region.
benefit of grant for NGO
Organic farms participating as project partners have also strengthened their positions for providing training and advice to
farmers (some of them have elaborate training facilities and programmes, see websites).
REC grant selection and The process was well managed. The budget and timing were tight (project partners started working before receiving the first
project administration
payment in order to fit within the timetable).
Communication results
Regular media coverage led to increased consumer interest which was reflected in increased visits to eco-stands (record was

kept, including a questionnaire for buyers).
Promotion materials were produced and distributed: posters, leaflets, brochures (no feedback on results).
DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
35

Croatia
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue
DRP Verifier
"HYLA" Soc. for Research

and Protection of Amphi-
DRP II 05-05 Let us Learn about Amphibians
USD 9,945
Pollution and habitat
23 October 06
bians and Reptiles;
the First to be Affected
destruction of amphibians

Green Osijek
Rayka Hauser
NGO project information The project aims to raise public awareness on the impacts of pollution and habitat destruction/fragmentation on amphibians,
(objectives, progress of
in order to encourage protection of wetland habitats from pollution and destruction.
activities, action quality
Implemented activities (to date of evaluation interview) in line with the project plan include: training of local population in the
and their environmental
Baranja County in monitoring techniques, carrying out of monitoring in selected areas, workshops and field work with school
relevance in relation to the children on monitoring amphibians, protecting their habitats and using them as indicators of habitat pollution and destruction.
Additional activities to be implemented until the end of the project (April 2007) include a second round of monitoring,
DRP key issues)
workshops with children, publications on monitoring results with maps of "black spots" and detected deformities, mitigation

activities and the development of a report with all data and indicators of public interest in the subject.
Relevant to DRP issues: biodiversity impacts of agricultural land use and pollution (demonstrated through biological
indicators)
Implementation process Introductory workshop and training was met with interest by local people from very different backgrounds, NGOs and
Stakeholder cooperation,
students. Monitoring implemented by local people demonstrated a clear relationship between agricultural activities and
media work, relation to
amphibian diversity. Some deformities were also discovered at two locations but it was difficult to establish relationship with
ICPDR, DEF, government pollution.

The seminar was announced with a press release and invitation on local radio, the work of volunteers was covered by local
RTL channel. Press releases are planned for the publications, discovered deformities, clean up of "black spots" and
workshops.
Cooperation with the management authority of Kopacki rit Nature Park, Friends of Kopacki rit and Green Osijek NGOs. Plans
for future joint activities for mitigation of road impacts in wetland areas (possibly in partnership with the Construction Faculty).
Local environment
No direct environmental benefit to date; potential future effects through increased awareness and support for the protection of
benefit of NGO actions
wetland habitats.
Local institutional
Increased network of partner organisations, possibly considering the establishment of a HYLA sub-office in Osijek.
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and Well implemented, the budget was well planned and sufficient for the activities.
project administration
Communication results
Volunteer work covered by local RTL channel, radio programmes. Project leader considers that work was not always

sufficiently well covered by the media and that NGOs still need to learn about working effectively with the media.
Promotion of the DRP
Logo on workshop invitations; will be placed also on future publications.
Attractiveness for DRP
Low: no direct environmental benefit, unclear to what degree the impact on amphibians can be used to sensitise the public to

the environmental and health effects of pollution.
Other comment
Website under development www.hyla.hr
DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
37

Czech Republic
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Veronica
STOP for Phosphates - Clean Water not only

2 Oct. 2006
in the South Moravia Region
USD 7,500
Phosphate-free detergents
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The original project goal (ban of phosphates in CZ) had to be revised, after the CZ government surprisingly decided such a
(objectives, progress of
new law (in force since Oct. 2006). The project thus aimed at raising awareness about the new law, an action which the
activities, action quality
government did not undertake (no media info!). A voluntary agreement of the industry failed after some 10 years, after
and their environmental
consumers did not care.
relevance in relation to the Veronica (as a registered eco-consultant office with 4000 visitors/year) closely cooperates with VUV (water research institute)
and the Market Inspectorate to monitor the changing use of detergents in a model micro-region (upper Olsava basin in the
DRP key issues)
White Carpathians with 15 villages and 15000 people), and to assess the impact of their awareness campaigns.
Implementation process
Apart from the 2 key project partners, Veronica is part of the NGO network STEP of eco-counselling centers and informs
Stakeholder cooperation,
about this project.
media work, relation to
First action was the monitoring of water quality (VUV) which will be continued beyond 2006. Second, a questionnaire on the
ICPDR, DEF, government
detergents use was given to all households (10% retrun rate). Third, 10,000 copies of a coloured leaflet were distributed and
some public events organised. Forth, Veronica consulted local people from its field office in the micro-region. Fifth, project
results were published in Nov. 2006 in a local seminar and press release. The Market Inspectorate will have to follow up.
Local environment
Very limited (effects not earlier than 2007)
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
Useful entry seminar (explanation of LogFrame). Better standing in the NGO network and with the 2 public partners. REC
benefit of grant for NGO
administration is normal.
REC selection administr
Winners' meeting was found very useful to meet other NGOs.
Communication results
Coloured info sheet "Bye, bye phosphates" Flier (black & white) "How to choose the right washing powder?" Article in
Veronica journal 2/2006.
Promotion of the DRP
Coured info sheet and flier; NGO journal.
Attractiveness for DRP
Small! There is no government campaign to introduce PO4-free detergents, thus the change of consumers will take long
time.
Other comment
Consultant did not understand that the NGO did not attack the government to fail in publicly announcing their new law.

38

Czech Republic
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

Moravian Carst - A Model Site of Protected

3 Oct. 2006
Renesance of Country
Surface and Underground Karst Waters in the DB
USD 7.700
Agricultural pollution of karst
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project takes place in the Moravian karst (a limestone plateau at 500 m asl. with cave systems in a 94 km² protected
(objectives, progress of
landscape, north of Brno) and aims at promoting methods for karst-sensitive agriculture and a specific cooperation with a
activities, action quality
model farm. The landscape is subject to intensive agriculture (3500 ha, mainly wheat, rape, maize), which impacts both karst
and their environmental
waters (in the 1980s, up to 400 kg N/ha resulted in the dissolving of cave features) and the landscape (e.g. sinkholes are
relevance in relation to the being filled up to ease farming). The small and young NGO is linked with the park administration.and tries to promote non-
arable land use. From 2000-2006, an EU SAPARD agro-environment programme reduced the pressure (220 ha converted,
DRP key issues)
260 ha without maize and on 40 ha testing of 6 m wide buffer strip around sinkholes). The NGO is also involved into the
preparation of a local LEADER project. (on the marketing of agro products).
Implementation process
Production of a flier, a CD and a webpage www.karst-agri.cz
Stakeholder cooperation,
On the Zemspol model farm, specific infos were provided to farmers on the conversion of arable land to grassland (above
media work, relation to
caves): brochure, several technical excursions (June, July and September with each 10-20 farmers, 6 more trips in autumn)
ICPDR, DEF, government
on the revitalisation of the karst landscape (via reduced application of fertilizer, sheep pasturing, planting of hedges etc.).
On 28 July, a seminar was held for 80 CZ farmers (incl. 5 from SK) about better farming (on agro-info centers, Nitrate
Directive, SAPARD programme 2007-13, agro laws, old genetic fruit tree varieties, breeding of sheep and goat, organic
farming in the karst, human impact on soil fauna, beekeeping and low energy houses).
NGO also cooperates with expert partners (Daphne CZ, Distelverein AT, Cortusa CZ)
Local environment
Small and indirect (number of informed farmers)
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
NGO became much better known
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and Positive experience but first payment only at the end of April (delay of project start!)
project administration
Communication results
Flier "Careful Agriculture" (in Czech), a very nice CD and a webpage. Reports in local media but also Czech TV news!
Promotion of the DRP
E.g. www.karst-agri.cz (soon also in English), on the flier and the CD.
Attractiveness for DRP
Limited (few practical activities but nice presentations)
Other comment
Interview was connected to a field trip to see the karst landscape, the Zemspol model farm with sinkhole buffer stripes and a
goat cheese producer

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
39

Czech Republic
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

Organic Agriculture for Water Protection

Bioinstitut Olomouc
Instructional presentation and its use for the
USD 7,500
Farmer education
3 Oct. 2006
Morava River Basin
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project focuses on reduction of agricultural pollution through encouragement of organic farming in the Morava basin
(objectives, progress of
(especially arable land). The Bioinstitut was founded in 2004 by the Pro Bio Association of Eco-Farmers (received a Regional
activities, action quality
DRP Grant in 2004/2005!), the Olomouc university and FIBL (Swiss Research Institute for Organic Farming). The Bioinstitut
and their environmental
does education, research and public information. It also organises the intl. Bioacademy on organic farming.
relevance in relation to the Today, there are over 830 organic farmers in Czechia (i.e. beyond DRB!), 30% owning 100-500 ha of land.
Target group are various farmers and professional bodies (farmer unions, new formation centers and advisors, agrarian
DRP key issues)
chamber and government).
Implementation process
Project tools prepared and executed by various in- and external professionals:
Stakeholder cooperation,
1. Training tools: 12 PPT presentations for farmers and secondary schools on pollution prevention and reduction, legal
media work, relation to
framework, plant nutrition and protection, animal breeding, farm conversion, on eco-farm management planning (at one farm
ICPDR, DEF, government
company);
2. Production of short films and animations on environment-friendly technologies (water protection) and practises in
grasslands and intensively used areas are produced i
3. Transfer of science into practise: Handbook (benefits of organic farming), seminar for agricultural schools (November).
Local environment
Indirect from 2007 on: 50 farmers involved in 2006.
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
New contacts to farmers and state nature conservation, who are linked to conventional farmers.
benefit of grant for NGO
Good communication opportunity.
REC grant selection and Budget had to be cut back by USD 2000 (less funds for experts, less lectures, one farm management plan cut). .
project administration
Good cooperation with the REC office.
Communication results
CD of PPT presentations for all farmers and teachers; will be advertised in special magazines.
Promotion of the DRP
Bio-Institute Annual Report (in 2005 reference was made to the Round 1 project)
Attractiveness for DRP
Very high!
Other comment

40

Slovakia
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Regional protection
Protection and Renovation of the Danube's

Protection and restoration of
26 Sep. 2006
association BROZ
Midland Delta
USD 8,000
Danube wetlands
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project site is a chain of floodplain habitats extended along the Danube from Bratislava down to Komarno.
(objectives, progress of
Project topic is the better management of Danube floodplain forests and the better and new protection of floodplain sites.
activities, action quality
This required various stakeholder cooperations.
and their environmental
BROZ has already good experience and successes on this issue: Thanks to a EU Life project, BROZ recently leased Velky
relevance in relation to the Lél, one of the biggest Danube islands (3 km long: 250 ha +another 80 ha of Danube banks) for 25 years and thus has the
possibility to show and achieve a nature-oriented wetland development.
DRP key issues)
Implementation process
1. Until April 2006: Successful lobbying to improve the new forest management plans for the Rusovce area (= 1500 ha at and
Stakeholder cooperation,
near Bratislava), i.e. achieve for the next 10 years a more natural management.
media work, relation to
2. Until November: Designation of nearly 1400 ha of new protected areas downstream of Gabcikovo (116 ha + 495 ha + 760
ICPDR, DEF, government
ha). Opening of new protected sites will be celebrated jointly with Povodie Dunaja (Danube water management body) and the
Bratislava waterworks.
3. Awareness raising: 2500 copies of a bilingual brochure about the floodplains and their pollution and flood reduction
function.
Local environment
Limited! More in terms of biodiversity protection than nutrient retention.
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
Limited because this is a relatively small project.
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and No problem, except that the budget was cut back by REC by 20% (several activities were cancelled).
project administration
Communication results
Bilingual brochure (2000 copies) ready in late 2006.
Promotion of the DRP
In the brochure!
Attractiveness for DRP
High! DRP grant sustained ecological management of state forests and lasting protection of 1,400 ha of Danube wetlands.
Other comment
NGO success is based on previous activities

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
41

Slovakia
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

Removal of Nitrogen and Fostering of

Stakeholder cooperation on
27 Sep. 2006
Bohatska sanca
Communication in the Zitava Basin
USD 7,000
river pollution reduction
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project aims to reduce pollution loads of Zitava river, a tributary of Vah river in southern SK (not far from Danube). The
(objectives, progress of
NGO undertook several monitoring activities to identify the main polluters, an inventory of waste disposal and a revitalisation
activities, action quality
of the natural flood space.
and their environmental
This was supported by media work and awareness raising activities (publication of brochure, organisation of seminars), and
relevance in relation to the executed in cooperation with Povodie Vah (river management agency). The Lower Zitava was regulated since 1830 to
support agriculture: Since 1972, at Surany 90% of the river discharge is diverted into Nitra river, thus altering the lower Zitava
DRP key issues)
section. Today, this section is part of a new protected bird site "CHVU Dolna Povazie" (lower Vah) up to Komarno.
Implementation process
Monitoring of water quality every 3 months with Aqua Merck.
Stakeholder cooperation,
Arrangement of cooperation agreements with river stakeholders (e.g. communes) to develop strategic planning. Topics:
media work, relation to
cleaning of river banks from illegal waste (communes hire unemployed people), WWTP planning, flood management, bike
ICPDR, DEF, government
tourism; studies on botany, ichthyology.
Improvement of 7 ha of grassland (4 mowings; removal of biomass) with Masekov Mlyn family farm.
October. Expert seminar with the strategic local partners (water and nature managers, mayors, landscape developers)
Local environment
Indirect: Pressure on identified polluters.
benefit of NGO actions
Some concrete field actions.
Local institutional
NGO expanded its geographical scope and contacts beyond the local commune.
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and Good experience with grant process and REC! Submitted budget was cut by 10%, first payment on 12 April.
project administration
Communication results
Local media reports. Publication of a brochure. More infos at www.zitava.sk
Promotion of the DRP
2 leaflets. A4 activity report incl. photos, maps and monitoring results.
Attractiveness for DRP
Small!!
Other comment

42

Slovakia
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

Revitalization of Cilizsky Stream in the

Umbra
Common Interest of the Partners of the
USD 7,200
Restoration of wetland
27 Sep. 2006
Danubian Fluvial Coalition
habitats
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information This project focuses on a 30 km long former Ciliz branch of the Danube in the back-country of the Slovak Danube which is
(objectives, progress of
today dissected and dry. It receives 2 m³/s of water from the Gabickovo dam canal but the connection to the lower branch
activities, action quality
section at the village of Cicov is blocked. Overall objective is the restoration of the main habitat of the rare fish Umbra krameri
and their environmental
(Mudminnow), once very typical for the Danube's back-country wetlands.
relevance in relation to the Povodie Dunaja (water managers) are interested in this project and committed to work out 4 restoration variants (for bridging
the Ciliz branch water over the drainage canal). In July 2006, a study of the regional nature protection authority and the
DRP key issues)
Danube floodplains protected landscape office provided technical data for the branch restoration.
The DRP project serves to raise awareness and support.
Implementation process
Activities started with local stakeholders communication (Povodie Dunaja as manager of the branch, communes and
Stakeholder cooperation,
schools). 20 stakeholders were contacted, e.g. 4 of the 7 contacted schools agreed to participate.
media work, relation to
1. Water pollution monitoring of Ciliz arm by local schools from spring to late autumn, using a template (nutrients, flora,
ICPDR, DEF, government
fauna).
2. Public field actions (small restoration works: e.g. removal of alien Fallopia bushes from the Ciliz banks of the central park
of the Gabcikovo village).
3. Simple monitoring of private wells (autumn).
In October, the NGO held a seminar on improved land use (with local farmers, water managers, communes): Field
instructions by boat!
Local environment
Few direct small-scale actions. Indirect: Preparation of branch revitalisation.
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
This is the first important action of this new NGO, thus very beneficial.
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and The very late payment of funds (end of April!) created serious problems for project implementation: Project start only in April
project administration
(3-5 active months instead of up to 10 months; planned cooperation with schools had to be postponed from spring into
autumn 2006.
Communication results
2 fliers in SK and HU language, brochure, webpage www.umbra.sk. Photo documentation of removal action.
Promotion of the DRP
Yes, e.g. in the fliers
Attractiveness for DRP
Good! Small-scale works to restore habitat of key Danube species
Other comment

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
43

Slovakia
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

The Future Without Toxic Pollution in the

6 Oct. 2006
Friends of the Earth
Danube Basin POPs in Sala town
USD 9,000
Hazardous waste pollution
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information Dusla Sala chemical plant is one of the biggest polluters in SK (no dioxin filter) but this project also addresses overall bad
(objectives, progress of
management of haz. waste in SK (>20 cities have incinerators). FoE is lobbying to promote BAT in current and future
activities, action quality
operations, and to raise awareness about toxics entering the local people's food:
and their environmental
In February, the NGO successfully run a campaign to stop the plan to build a new haz. waste incinerator in Sala town (MoE
relevance in relation to the decided to refuse the project). In March, FoE analysed eggs from local people and found toxic pollutants (POPs): e.g. the
double amount of dioxin and PCBs than allowed. The protest of the company on these "allegations" resulted in a new
DRP key issues)
independent expert study ordered by the plant which found even up to 15 times more dioxin than permitted. As a response
also to big media interest, the plant started cooperation with FoE how to upgrade its incinerator and decrease its waste!
Implementation process
The NGO undertook stakeholder cooperations at all levels (government, municipality, media, local people, scientists,
Stakeholder cooperation,
chemical plant etc.) to conduct its activities. Monitoring results are scientifically backed. Public lobbying works also included
media work, relation to
activities at state and EU level (re. WFD implementation in terms of haz. waste disposal can result in haz. waste import to SK
ICPDR, DEF, government
incinerators and landfills).
In autumn 2006, the project consisted of the following activities:
· Cleaning of an illegal land fill (house waste mixed with haz. waste of batteries, paint, sprays, oil) at the city banks of Vah
river: executed jointly with Sala town (limited DRP funds were complemented by NGO and city funds).
· Education campaign in the Sala district "Don't burn your house waste!": few thousand leaflets given to each household
· Study of toxic ash from waste incinerators (December 2006)
· Continued monitoring of the Dusla Sala plant
· "Waste Commando": A mixed group (police man, environment inspector, journalist, NGO and municipal staff) monitor illegal
waste dumping and clean such sites; "bad guys" are caught and their dreadful action published in media.
· Seminar on correct waste management and illegal dumps for municipal staff.
Local environment
Multiple (direct and indirect) for nature (water), local people and the industry.
benefit of NGO actions
Ministry announced to upgrade its own monitoring.
Local institutional
The public standing and credibility was extremely increased during this DRP project. New cooperations were established.
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and
Today very good (some years ago rather bureaucratic); late payment was no problem.
project administration
Communication results
Multiple media reports nation-wide: already at mid-term > 80 articles, interviews and TV spots.
Promotion of the DRP
In leaflet and press conference.
Attractiveness for DRP
Very high!!!
Other comment
NGO activities were building up on pervious work and projects and could thus have such impressive results.

44

Bulgaria
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

Cleaning the Danube River Valley in Lom

Intereco-21 Federation
Municipality from Industrial, Agricultural and
USD 5,800
Improving waste management
10-11 Oct. 2006
Municipal Wastes
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information Rather unclear project objectives and activities!
One is the cleaning of 2 km of the bank zone of the town of Lom (Danube and the mouth of Lom river) from various waste
(litter) after the floods in spring 2006 (3 actions!). This involves, apart from pupils and pensionists, Roma people (can keep
the collected wood). Second activity: Roma (40% of Lom population) are trained to produce and sell compost (from collected
and separated household waste): 2 seminars on waste management held with Roma people, teachers and 40 young
ecologists.
Project leader (renowned scientist) plans to build compost plant (mix organic fraction with paper!). Concept is hard to believe!
Implementation process
Apparently good new cooperation with municipality (support for reducing the Roma problem).Successful education activities

with local people. This cooperation with Roma seems to be very difficult in terms of good outputs.
No compost produced, no planting of trees (due to erosion of steep river banks), no agricultural policy work or eco-farming!
Local environment
Direct: Cleaning of littered river banks.
benefit
Indirect: awareness, training
Future: MoEW intends to finance a composting project in 2007
Local institutional
New cooperation with the municipality
benefit of grant for NGO
Follow-up project 2007.
REC grant selection and Easy process; good cooperation!
project administration
Communication results
3 fliers (> 200 copies). Via local media (incl. TV and radio). CD-Rom with nice action photos.
Promotion of the DRP
On one of 3 fliers
Attractiveness for DRP
Low
Other comment
Doubts about the promoted new technical system (new composting technology providing via paper carbon into compost).

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
45

Bulgaria
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

Reconstruction of Wet Land Habitats in

10-11 Oct. 2006
Euromodel Association
Oriahovo Municipality
USD 5,900
Wetland rehabilitation
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project site is in the Mizia district near Oriahovo city: It is an old river bed of the Skat creek near the mouth of Ogosta
(objectives, progress of
river into the Danube. The 2005 flood event deepened the former farm land (kind of self-restoration of the wetland). The river
activities, action quality
bed divides the village of Krushovica but the mayor and local people became interested in the proposed wetland restoration:
and their environmental
Euromodel mowed 3,000 m² of reed, collected disposed waste (total: 3 truck loads) and planted water lilies. Local party
relevance in relation to the budgets funded the installation of 15 sitting benches. In the future, the wetland "Water Lily Park") will serve local nature
education (planned establishment of a zoo with indigenous species and development of fisheries).
DRP key issues)
Implementation process
The first seminar (8 April) introducing the project was attended by 400 people, including 300 kids from the local school. It
Stakeholder cooperation,
served to establish the local private-public partnership. The clearing action in late May involved again local kids. The 2nd
media work, relation to
seminar in late October presented the results and served to discuss future activities. A questionnaire was also filled in about
ICPDR, DEF, government
the project impact.
Apart from the works at the Krushovica wetland, the NGO wants to build an ecotrail (for cycling tourism and local recreation)
from Kozlodui up to the wetland (25 km). The local commune promised to take care of the new park in the future.
Local environment
Due to the drainage of the Danube floodplains, certain species lost their habitats, such as the water lily. The re-introduced
benefit of NGO actions
specimen come from a nature reserve at the Turkish border (permitted by MoE).
Local institutional
Euromodel exists since 2004 and is experienced in youth education. This project improved their capacity and inspired them
benefit of grant for NGO
for new projects.
REC grant selection and Simple process. Budget cut-back was no problem.
project administration
Communication results
Multiple at local level.
Promotion of the DRP
Info package (coloured A4 envelop, 2 folders, flier, calendar, single A4 sheet), prominently displaying the DRP support
Attractiveness for DRP
Low!
Other comment
CD received on the wetland project

46

Bulgaria
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Regional Initiative
Improvement of the Environmental Status of

10-11 Oct. 2006
Association
the Danube River - Timok valley (Bregovo)
USD 6,200
Heavy metal pollution
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information Major problem is the severe heavy metal pollution of Timok by the Bor mining complex in Serbia; its lasting and growing
(objectives, progress of
health impact (alarming cancer rates!) is not officially accepted ("no monitoring data of concern" at Envir. Inspectorate) but
activities, action quality
the mayor and some people from Bregovo now increase the local awareness.
and their environmental
This is a small-scale NGO activity with good success but it would need much wider political scope (a national and intl. political
relevance in relation to the issue!) and more relevant NGO activities.
DRP key issues)
Implementation process
Successful stakeholder workshop "How to work successfully about our cause" proposed a Public Information and
Stakeholder cooperation ... Environment Education Program. A new regional NGO network (17 members) with representatives from Serbia and Romania
was established; new website www.sri-bg.com went online; planning for investigation of vegetation species on Timok river
(aim: stimulate phyto-remediation by planting reed along banks); school campaign dedicated to intl. Danube Day (distributed
leaflets, open lessons, drawing competition) in 2 schools.
Local environment
Planned planting of reed in 2007 by Municipality
benefit of NGO actions
Indirect: growing awareness of local people and pressure on Envir. Inspectorate.
Local institutional
Higher NGO capacity and experience, new NGO network, new cooperation with Bregovo municipality
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and Process was ok!
project administration
Communication results
500 leaflets on transbound. pollution and drinking water protection. Reports in local media, exhibition of awarded pictures
Promotion of the DRP
See folder and http://www.sri-bg.com/page.php?page=proj1program.html
Attractiveness for DRP
High!
Other comment

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
47

Bulgaria
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
European
Organizing a Competition for Movies and

Environmental Festival
Documentaries about the Danube Basin
USD 5,000
Public awareness
10-11 Oct. 2006
Foundation
Pollution
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information This young NGO (2004) succeeded at its 2nd European environment festival "Green Wave 21st century" (7-9 May 2006) to
(objectives, progress of
attract over 90 film productions from 17 countries (incl. ORF, ARD, ZDF, BR, RAI, India, Israel). Over 700 people watched
activities, action quality
films in 2 halls under the patronage of the BG Vice-President. Venue: Dolna Banya, 60 km south-east of Sofia with a green
and their environmental
image (stork city). In 2006 a special category featured the "state of the Danube river". The intl. jury awarded 9 prizes and
relevance in relation to the gave the "Stork Nest" Grand Prix to Swedish/Greenpeace and RAI documentaries, the BG military channel film "48 hours
rain" and to the ORF TV film "Blue Danube Black Sea".
DRP key issues)
Side events: Round table with 60 invitees (MoEW, Danube cities and other stakeholders, funded by DRP) discussing
Danube pollution and Iskar river flood impact reduction. - All festival participants planted a tree in the "Green Europe" park.
Youth competition: drawings about "River and lakes the clear eyes of Bulgaria. 5 Prizes awarded among 40 kids from
local school.
DRP funds covered 1/3 of the budget.
Implementation process
Very successful cooperation with commune and media. Intl. interest by "big" film makers.
Stakeholder cooperation,
Smooth and low-budget organisation by committed NGO. So far few foreign/intl. links.
media work, intl. relation
Local environment
Indirect: awareness (e.g. BG flood experts learned about flood forecasting using space models)
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
The grant allowed the festival to become a regular event, which was perfectly reported in media. A new contact could be
benefit of grant for NGO
established with a renowned film festival in Serbia.
REC grant selection and No problem but also not too easy
project administration
Communication results
Over 25 articles in national and intl. print and e-media; 11 TV and radio broadcasts and interviews (all TV evening news,
Deutsche Welle, Turkish TV etc.
Promotion of the DRP
250 copies of the festival brochure show the DRPO logo on the cover. See also: http://www.euroekofest.org/indexen.html
Attractiveness for DRP
Very high: Real success story!
Other comment
Questions to ICPDR: Can there be an annual sponsoring of Danube movies (ca. 5-10,000/year)??? Is a link possible to
Coca Cola BG?

48

Bulgaria
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Bulgarian Biodiversity
More Space for Rivers and Safety for People

10-11 Oct. 2006
Foundation
USD 5,100
Integrated flood protection
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project is based on research efforts since 1998 to assess biodiversity and flood issues of BG rivers. Three flood events
(objectives, progress of
on Iskar and Ossam rivers in 2005 (failure of hydro-technical schemes) gave ground to this DRP project. Objective is to
activities, action quality
assess the flood impacts, also on biodiversity, and to identify potential areas for bigger flood retention (and floodplain
and their environmental
restoration). This included the digital mapping of suitable areas (co-funded by the Danube Basin Directorate!). NGO
relevance in relation to the activities are also linked to the WFD Twinning project and are reported to the High Expert Council on Water at the MoE. The
NGO will be involved into the preparation of a national conference on flood protection in early 2007 (involving ICPDR).
DRP key issues)
Implementation process
Through the mapping activities, the NGO managed to become a key source of important and innovative information. It is
Stakeholder cooperation,
successfully cooperating with the relevant government bodies at all levels, especially the Danube Basin Directorate in Pleven.
media work, relation to
The NGO drafted a Manual to evaluate river zones with a potential flood risk, and proposed to the Danube basin Council a
ICPDR, DEF, government
Programme for reducing the flood risks. Follow-up activities (proposals for model restoration areas) were prepared for MoE
and the Danube Directorate.
Local environment
Indirect: Substantially improved database of 2 rivers; introduction of integrated water management.
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
Much improved NGO competence (important database) and stakeholder cooperation.
benefit of grant for NGO
Second partner, the Balkani Wildlife Society can now work out concrete model projects for biodiversity protection.
REC grant selection and
Half of the NGO budget was cut by REC, therefore the activities had to be reduced (less areas assessed on Ossam and
project administration
Iskar, nothing on Vit river). REC could not provide technical feed-back during execution.
Communication results
New web-page created. 2,000 fliers will be distributed. Published articles and media interviews.
Promotion of the DRP
Probably good (not available at the time of the interview).
Attractiveness for DRP
Very high: Key issue for Danube basin.
Other comment

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
49

BULGARIA
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
"World for All"

27 Sept., 2006
Association, Silistra
Stop Danube River Nutrient Pollution
USD 5 700
Water pollution by agriculture

Mark Redman
NGO project information Established in 2000, the World for All (WFA) Association is a small and active community-based organisation committed to
(objectives, progress of
raising public awareness of a range of environmental issues in and around Silistra in north-east Bulgaria. Although a
activities, action quality
relatively small NGO they are clearly well-connected at a local level with local government officials, institutions, schools, the
and their environmental
local media etc. This was their first project connected to agriculture. The objectives of the project were very straightforward:
relevance in relation to the · monitor a section of the Danube for pollutants relating to agriculture;
DRP key issues)
· inform local people about these pollutants, and;
· advise local farmers on how to reduce the level of these pollutants.
Implementation process
These objectives were pursued through the following project activities:
Stakeholder cooperation,
· Water sampling and analysis mid-stream water samples were taken once per month during the duration of the project
media work, relation to
(January November 2006) from 4 points on the Danube adjacent to Silistra (plus from the lake of the nearby Srebarna
ICPDR, DEF, government
Nature Reserve) and analysed for PO4, NH4, NO2 and NO3;
· Publication of results the monthly results of the water testing were published in the local newspaper and placed on a
display board next to the main entrance to the Major's Office in Silistra a very visible location that apparently attracted a
lot of interest;
· Preparation of information leaflet 500 copies of a simple 2 page, A4, 4 colour leaflet was produced for distribution to
farmers. This provided basic information on the implementation of the Nitrate Directive in Silistra county, including the
Code of Good Agricultural Practice and the Nitrate Vulnerable Zone (NVZ) Action programme;
· Public meetings at least 4 meetings were held with farmers, students (some students worked as volunteers on the
project) and other local businesses, including the owners of local factories that are also a potential source of pollution;
· Final Report a full report of project activities and results was being prepared for submission to the Danube Regional
Directorate office in Silistra.
Local environment
This was an aware-raising project and not designed to produce direct environmental benefits. However, according to WFA
benefit of the NGO
many local people are very concerned about the pollution of the river and are receptive to new ideas therefore if there are
actions
viable options for encouraging farmers to reduce pollution (e.g. through the uptake of organic farming) they will be supported
at a local level. This project was seen as a first step towards promoting more sustainable agriculture in the region.
Local institutional
WFA were very happy with this project since it provided them with their first opportunity to learn about local agricultural issues
benefit of the grant for the in more detail and to work directly with farmers. With the experience now accumulated they are keen to prepare and/or co-
NGO
operate on other agricultural projects e.g. under the Coca-Cola Green Danube Initiative. They were particularly interested in
"green economics" and could see many opportunities for promoting the economic benefits of more environmentally-friendly
farming methods to local farmers.
REC grant selection and No problems reported all procedures very straightforward and good links were established with REC
project administration
Communication results
Excellent communication with clear presentation and explanation of the project to the local community
Promotion of the DRP
Good visible on display board at the Major's Office in Silistra, the published leaflet and all datasheets. Mentioned in all

50

BULGARIA
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
"World for All"

27 Sept., 2006
Association, Silistra
Stop Danube River Nutrient Pollution
USD 5 700
Water pollution by agriculture

Mark Redman
newspaper articles.
Attractiveness for DRP
High a simple project, not too ambitious with achievable objectives in the limited time available. An interesting and useful
example for other local NGOs that is easily replicable.
Other comment
Lack of networking with other DRP-related projects - WFA was not aware of:
· the regional project (No. 21728 - Best Agricultural Practice in my Farm) led by the Black Sea NGO Network which
included Silistra municipality as one of its target areas. This was a lost opportunity for some useful networking and
possible combination of effort. It would have been useful to encourage greater contact/communication between national
and regional projects within the DRP-SGP, and;
· activities undertaken in Bulgaria under Phase 2 of the agricultural components (outputs 1.2 & 1.3) of the DRP. There
were lots of useful materials produced by Carlbro that could have been very effectively disseminated through a project
such as this.

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
51

Bosnia i Herzegovina
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

Cleaner production In food industry

15 Nov. 2006
CESD Sarajevo
USD 5,200
Organic pollution
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information This project is based on a previous project (EU-Life 2004) on agricultural pollution (35 minutes DVD!).
(objectives, progress of
The project focuses on raising awareness about the new environmental law requiring environmental permits for cleaner
activities, action quality
production of the different branches of the food industry (dairy, fruit and vegetable processing, beverages and slaughter
and their environmental
houses). This is simply explained in a new brochure, a new DVD and a one-day training.
relevance in relation to the While the BiH Federation expressed first little interest, the Republika Srpska's Chamber of Commerce became a strong NGO
partner. In the follow-up project (EC Life), the training will be repeated in the Federation.
DRP key issues)
Implementation process 2 trainings in Sept. 2006 arranged at the Chamber of Commerce in Banja Luka and Bijeljina (11+9 participants from
Stakeholder cooperation,
Chamber, industry and media). There, the RS government, NGO CESD and a consultant explained the legal framework, the
media work, relation to
possibilities of cleaner production and the permit application. All participants received the ppt presentations, the brochure and
ICPDR, DEF, government the new DVD with more information.
Local environment
NGOs initiated and accelerated the legal process and, consequently, the environment improvement.
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
Better position as NGO, new stakeholder contacts
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and The requested NGO budget was substantially cut back, resulting in an inadequate payment of the activities undertaken.
project administration
Grant submission was easy to follow, administration is ok.
Communication results
DVD! 350 copies of a new brochure (16 coloured pages). Only few media reports (no interest in environment).
Promotion of the DRP
Good!
Attractiveness for DRP
High! Throughout the DRB, only few NGOs worked on this pollution aspect.
Other comment
No real networking with other NGOs, though another NGO from Banja Luka did a very similar project (only initial contact).

52

Bosnia i Herzegovina
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
NERDA / Ekopot / Radio
Save the Spreca river (Sava river basin)

15 Nov. 2006
Kameleon
USD 13,400
Agricultural pollution
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information NERDA is the Regional Development Agency of North-Eastern BiH, established in 2004 under the EC Delegation and co-
(objectives, progress of
funded by 34 local municipalities, Brcko and the canton. Its Assembly of Development Associations includes 35 mayors and
activities, action quality
various stakeholders (incl. NGOs). A Regional Development Strategy was jointly worked out in 2004 and updated in 2006.
and their environmental
Priorities include the improvement of the quality of life and of environment protection.
relevance in relation to the Project goal is the reduction of chemical pollution from agriculture and the promotion of alternative practises and agro-
tourism. There are no farming advisory services or agro-business centers to educate local people who in many cases only
DRP key issues)
recently started farming but are ignorant of health and environment risks. Focus is on 2 small municipalities in the upper and
lower Spreca basin in northern BiH, the canton capital Tuzla with many industries is in the center of the basin.
Implementation process
In this project, the 3 NGOs had different roles: NERDA is the coordinator, Ekopot provides expertise (agriculture, environment
Stakeholder cooperation,
protection and tourism), and Kameleon is the widely broadcasting media partner (e.g. regular shows on certain topics, short
media work, relation to
jingles 3 x / day and 3 large bill boards on drinking water pollution and on pesticides shown over 3 months). The project was
ICPDR, DEF, government
presented in January 2006 at canton level (30 representatives from canton government, agricultural institute, engineering
sector and NGOs). 25 farmers in both municipalities were interviewed in April and December 2006 to assess the project
success. 4 workshops were held with farmers and agriculture students, involving a consultant on biological agents
(alternative to conventional pesticides) and presenting the use of pesticides, eco-agro-tourism and BAP.
Projects established a Forum of Agro-stakeholders at canton level. Farmer training will continue even after the project.
Local environment
Not within this project period and hard to measure but very likely.
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
The project has a demo character for such partnerships with NGOs but it lacks more extended stakeholder cooperation.
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and
REC asked the 3 NGOs to merge their similar grant concepts: This was positively received!.
project administration
The overall process was good, the REC support beneficial. Administration is no big burden.
Communication results
Only TV and radio so far.
Promotion of the DRP
Excellent! Radio, billboards etc. CD received with workshop ppt presentations!
Attractiveness for DRP
High! First steps to secure the start of BAP in an area without any advisory services.
Other comment
This constitutes the largest grant given to a national NGO (in fact 3!) in the DRB.

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
53

Hungary
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

Sajó-Hernád Rivers Flood and Water

5 Oct. 2006
Holocen
Pollution Priorities
USD 5,580
Stakeholder cooperation
Alexander Zinke
NGO project information The project addresses the problem of flood risks in a rural area in the Sajo-Hernad basin and tries to improve disaster
preparedness and damage prevention. Project area is the Bodva valley (1700 km²), a 35 km long tributary of the Sajo, which
includes 48 villages with 10,000 households. The hilly landscape is largely forested but includes some agricultural land. The Mád
hills were affected by 3 floods of Vadász creek in 2 years, probably due to inappropriate forestry and agriculture.
Aim is to foster integrated land use planning by creating a stakeholder forum.
Implementation process
Activities include
Stakeholder cooperation,
· a field check (e.g. of pollution spots in this former mining area),
media work, relation to
· a problem cadastre developed with local stakeholders (includes micro-region agency,
ICPDR, DEF, government
· a stakeholder conference in July together with the Bodva village association and Aggtelek national park to discuss solutions
· identification of a pilot area for better land management
· preparation of publications to explain how to improve land management and how to get subsidies to achieve BAP/BAT
Local environment
Limited: Only Indirectly via raised awareness about better land management
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
Better standing and publicity for Holocen
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and
Budget was cut back by 30% was agreed with REC, thus the 2nd stakeholder conference had to be cancelled.
project administration
Grant received only in March. Cooperation with REC is very good.
Communication results
Broshure for landowners and farmers (150 copies, 50 pages)
Flier for other local people (1000 copies)
Promotion of the DRP
Maps with DRP and REC logo.
Attractiveness for DRP
Small: Only start of stakeholder cooperation
Other comment

54

HUNGARY
Project title
Budget
Main environmental issue
DRP Verifier

Water pollution from

Tavirózsa Association
Szdrákos Creek Program - Phase 2
USD 4,651
nutrients
Paul Csagoly
NGO project
Area of concern is catchment of Szdrákos Creek north of Budapest. Main concerns are the introduction of foreign grass carp
information
fish species to lakes which destroyed natural vegetation that used to help absorb nutrient pollution. Many fishermen prefer to
have the fish in clear open spaces. Other nutrient inputs come from leaching household cesspits and discharge from local
sewage treatment plant. Water quality monitoring by authorities has also been poor.
Implementation
First funds were used to purchase water testing equipment to test pollution levels which found very high organic and nutrient
process
counts. Funds also used to create small pilot site which was fenced off from rest of lake, grass carp were removed, and natural
wetland vegetation from surrounding area was replanted in pilot site. Water quality monitoring to take place at start and end of
project to see if nutrient pollution went down final results not in yet. Discussions took place with mayor to improve sewage
treatment discharge. One of three local fishing associations agreed to work with NGO measures.
Local environmental
End results could prove nutrient pollution was lowered. Alien species removed will allow for endemic species of fish and
benefit
wetland plants to thrive. Wetland species were returned to site through replanting efforts. Mayor may agree to improve sewage
plant discharge. Water quality could improve in future which would help large local bathing area.
Local institutional
Funds helped NGO do the pilot site, the results of which they hope to use to get a larger grant to do similar efforts for all three
benefit
lakes. New testing equipment will be used long-term.
REC
No problems with REC
Communication
Not very well communicated as NGO has few communication skills and resources and no local media exists. But NGO made
results
own local radio station that now promotes their work.
Promotion of DRP
Adequate
Attractiveness for DRP Very high! Wetlands Background Story came from this!
Other Comment

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
55

HUNGARY
Project title
Budget
Main environmental issue
DRP Verifier
Clean Air Working
Chemical Reduction and Pollution Prevention
Agricultural pollution

Group
Campaign
USD 5,581
(pesticides)
Paul Csagoly
NGO project information This NGO is very famous throughout Hungary in the area of air pollution. Also worked on chemicals and little with pesticides.
This was first project dealing with farmers. Goal is to raise their awareness of dangers of chemical pesticides and natural
alternatives.
Implementation process Had pilot sites in 2 villages, actions on ground organized by 2 local NGOs. Surveys at start and finish of project with farmers.
Made informational materials (e.g. training CD) and powerpoint presentations for farmers (and those that can influence them)
on pesticide problems and alternatives. Project appears to have really reached only a few farmers. Some local media
successes (e.g. TV interview). Also presented availability of the tools for farmer education through their website and chemical
newsletter which reaches over 200 people.
Also had campaign against use of household chemical bug-killers. This included a 2-page Fact Sheet and CD.
Barriers were (1) they wanted to make brochure for local authorities about pesticide legislation in line with EU law but this is
on hold because EU law is changing, and (2) couldn't get information on pesticide content in water from Hungarian
authorities.
Local environm. benefit
None visible yet. Maybe reduction in use of anti-bug chemicals in homes.
Local institutional
First pilot for them with farmers and they'd like to do more. It also strengthened their increasing reputation as a key
benefit
stakeholder in pesticide use discussions in Hungary (e.g. inter-ministerial forum). Now significant part of the dialogue.
REC
Very good relationship. Rita came to meetings and money came on time.
Communication results
Some local media coverage, story in NGO chemical newsletter and broader newsletter. Household campaign had coverage
on TV and radio (this appears to have been quite successful in terms of media).
Promotion of DRP
Adequate, DRP logo visible
Attractiveness for DRP
Low: no big successes
Other Comment

56

HUNGARY
Project title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier

Ipoly River Cleaning Action and Environmentally-

Magosfa Alapítvány
Friendly Technologies Exhibition
USD 4,651 Water pollution from waste
Paul Csagoly
NGO project
The area of concern is the Lower Ipoly River which is the partial border between Hungary and Slovakia. Waste is the big
information
problem. While local wells used to provide local drinking water supply until about 10 years ago, pollution caused the wells to be
closed and all locals now depend on Budapest wells. Main sources are agriculture and village wastewater, sewage and illegal
garbage dumping. Many farmers work on their own but lack knowledge and training about properly applying pesticides or
fertilizers. DRP funds were provided in both grant rounds. Activities focused on awareness raising and workshops with farmers.
Implementation
In 2005, the NGO monitored all pollution sources. Public awareness raising actions included a river cleaning with volunteers
process
where about 100 bags of garbage were collected. This received significant media coverage in both countries and reached
millions of people. Its main message was that local residents can also do much to resolve water pollution problems. Areas with
illegal waste dumping were also identified.
Actions were also taken with farmers through 13 workshops that reached about 100 farmers. Farmers were hard to reach given
a lack of local media outlets. Workshops were geared to raising awareness about pollution (nutrient and toxic), the benefits of
organic farming and on how to get funds for agri-environmental projects.
In 2006, similar activities were repeated including the river cleaning action which again gained broad media coverage,
awareness raising for farmers, and lobbying local authorities to collect local electronic waste. DRP funds also led to the
purchase of a canoe.
Partners included local volunteers, municipal officials, the Ipoly Menti Valalkozo Klubja, fishing associations, Sports Clubs (gave
canoes for cleaning), fishing supervisor gave fish soups, local garbage dump took the garbage, municipality approved cleanup,
border police allowed setting up camps in the border area. Lots of cooperation! Although not that much from local authorities
yet.
Local environ. benefit
Many bags of waste were collected from the river.
Local institutional
Local partnerships were strengthened with partners noted above. The NGO received a canoe. And NGO branding was
benefit
increased through visibility at actions and media this should help getting more donations through the Hungarian 1% tax
exemption system. The NGO is not in DEF but would consider it.
REC
No problems experienced in second round but first round had delays with contracts. Overall, the DRP process is very good and
flexible and much smoother than the EU grant process which is more bureaucratic.
Communication
Lots of communications through media and printed materials.
results
Promotion of DRP
DRP logos are displayed but NGO seemed to think REC was chiefly responsible for the grant and not UNDP/GEF.
Attractiveness for DRP Good example of success in awareness raising through media and river action
Other Comment

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
57

Moldova
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue
DRP Verifier
Public Association
Reactivation of the secondary (biological)

`Calitatea Mediuli'
water purifying stage in the Wastewater
14,000 USD
Wastewater treatment
6 Oct. 06
treatment plant of Ungheni District
upgrade and nutrient testing
Peter Whalley
NGO project information This large NGO (30 staff) has undertaken to renovate a wastewater treatment works (second stage) with a capacity of 50,000
pe. This is a second project received and the first project successfully upgraded the primary stage of the WWTW. Initially the
expectation was to obtain co-funding from the Ecological Fund from the Ministry, however this was not available and the
project, whilst upgrading some parts of the WWTW was unable to complete the work. The project focused more attention on
providing test kits for nutrients (N) in water from wells and rivers and 15 kits were distributed to schools. Awareness raising
has been an important part of this activity.
Implementation process
Stakeholders have included local authorities (environmental inspectorates, municipal administration, wastewater treatment

operators, etc.) schools etc. A total of 6 radio programmes will be completed on this project.
Local environment
Significant direct improvements due to wastewater treatment works upgrade (reduction in BOD has been measured as a
benefit of NGO actions
result of the first project)
Local institutional
DRP funds have assisted NGO with training in the use of test kits and education on issues associated with contamination of
benefit of grant for NGO
water supplies with nutrients
REC selection & admin.
NGO satisfied with REC (MD) support. REC have visited site, and good communication and support on budget issues
Communication results
Seminars and radio programmes
Promotion of the DRP
Yes
Attractiveness for DRP
Very
Other comment
Test kits were prepared by the NGOs and results indicated that 47% of drinking wells exceeded acceptable nitrate levels

58

Moldova
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Public Association
Reactivation of the secondary (biological)

`Calitatea Mediuli'
water purifying stage in the Wastewater
14,000 USD
Wastewater treatment
6 Oct. 06
treatment plant of Ungheni District
upgrade and nutrient testing
Peter Whalley
NGO project information This large NGO (30 staff) has undertaken to renovate a wastewater treatment works (second stage) with a capacity of 50,000
pe. This is a second project received and the first project successfully upgraded the primary stage of the WWTW. Initially the
expectation was to obtain co-funding from the Ecological Fund from the Ministry, however this was not available and the
project, whilst upgrading some parts of the WWTW was unable to complete the work. The project the focused more attention
on providing test kits for nutrients (N) in water from wells and rivers and 15 kits were distributed to schools. Awareness
raising has been an important part of this activity.
Implementation process
Stakeholders have included local authorities (environmental inspectorates, municipal administration, wastewater treatment

operators, etc.) schools etc. A total of 6 radio programmes will be completed on this project.
Local environment
Significant direct improvements due to wastewater treatment works upgrade (reduction in BOD has been measured as a
benefit of NGO actions
result of the first project)
Local institutional
DRP funds have assisted NGO with training in the use of test kits and education on issues associated with contamination of
benefit of grant for NGO
water supplies with nutrients
REC grant selection and NGO satisfied with REC (MD) support. REC have visited site, and good communication and support on budget issues
project administration
Communication results
Seminars and radio programmes
Promotion of the DRP
Yes
Attractiveness for DRP
Very
Other comment
Test kits were prepared by the NGOs and results indicated that 47% of drinking wells exceeded acceptable nitrate levels

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
59

Moldova
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Public Association
The reduction of nutrient pollution in the Danube

`Cutezatorul'
Basin through the promotion and use of good
10,000 USD
Best Agricultural Practice
10/10/06
agricultural practices
Peter Whalley
NGO project information Second DRP grant, on environmental agricultural practices, have adapted their conclusions from first round in preparing this,
more targeted project. Main objectives are to provide guidance and technical advice on organic farming employing BAP.
Raising awareness with local farmers and other stakeholders in Balti and Falesti regions.
Implementation process
NGO undertook a `contest' to identify 25 local farmers to participate in the trials of organic/environmentally friendly methods.
Stakeholder cooperation,
In addition to the 25 who were selected an additional 5 also participated. Had contract with farmers and all farmers paid 25 lei
media work, relation to
(approximately 2 USD) to be involved. This was considered important to ensure the `ownership' of the activity by farmers.
ICPDR, DEF, government
Other stakeholders include the local administration and population. Have organised international conferences (UA and RO)
for interested parties. Have prepared a number of radio and newspaper articles to raise awareness over 25 events
prepared. REC MD has included a one page story on their activities. 15 farmers from RO have visited to see sites. Also
farmers were provided with travel grants to visit similar farms operating BAP etc in Romania. Project has had contact with MD
World Bank APC project.
Local environment
Farmers are seeing the benefits of BAP approach through the reduction of chemicals from increased yields of sunflower
benefit of the NGO
achieving 500 800 kg/ha increased yields over those who did not used BAPs. The region used to apply 1.5 2 t/ha/yr of
actions
nitrogen. Now using 30 times less and the manure produced is being utilised rather than been wholly dependent on chemical
fertiliser and leaving the manure for waste (and subsequent pollution).
Local institutional
DRP funds helped farmers with BAP and providing significant exposure to stakeholders of the work. Assisting in building
benefit of grant for NGO
capacity in region to be involved in future EC projects in Prut basin.
REC selection & admin.
No comments
Communication results
Excellent
Promotion of the DRP
Good
Attractiveness for DRP
Very high.
Other comment
Should be discussed further with REC MD to further publicise this work.

60

Moldova
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Public Association

`Mediul si Sanatatea
`The Danube and I' - Media Campaign
7,920 USD
Environmental Health
10 Oct. 06
awareness raising
Peter Whalley
NGO project information The NGO is aimed at environmental health issues and was created in 2000 after a visit to USA and seeing what NGOs can
achieve. Target is children, teachers and parents. Also preparing material to educate local population on threatened species
within the River Prut Basin.
Implementation process
Good co-operation with schools and Ministry of Education. Implemented a competition for art work from children, Publicised

radio and papers. Received 1000 contributions. Assessment included representatives from the Min of Education. Winners
presented with prizes in Chisinau Natural History museum.
Local environment
Awareness increased in children their parents and teachers.
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
NGO has prepared significant resources for education and believes strongly on changes in environmental understanding
benefit of grant for NGO
begins with children's education. Teachers will also be asked to adapt the material to their specific needs.
REC grant selection and Good support from the REC MD. REC has also included this project in a recent magazine,
project administration
Communication results
Radio, newspapers, seminars (will invite TV), presentations at Natural History Museum involving deputy ministers. REC-MD
magazine. Web site.
Promotion of the DRP
Good
Attractiveness for DRP
Good
Other comment

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
61

Moldova
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Cahul Ecologic
Public Involvement in the Process of Nutrient

Consultations Centre
Reduction in the Lower Prut Basin and Nutrient
8,080 USD
Nutrients and pesticide dumps
11 Oct. 06
Pollution Prevention through complex monitoring
in southern Moldova
Peter Whalley
of the quality of the environment
NGO project information Wide range of environmental issues being addressed (nutrients is now a minor part, but focus is on pesticide dumps in Cahul
region). Began with an assessment of nutrient sources in the Cahul Judet. Topics are relevant to the DRP. Project is
important as, despite much project interest in assessing pesticide dumps, little has been done to inform the public on the
issues.
Implementation process
Involvement of local administrators, farmers and local agricultural representatives. With the broadening to include the

contamination of soil and water by pesticides from dumps are approaching the wider population. Significant soil and water
analysis being performed with co-operation with Hydromet laboratory in Chisinau.
Local environment
Better understanding of both nutrients in the region and the impact of the pesticide dumps on water and soil.
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
Improved awareness for local population on pesticides. Results and conclusions will be distributed at a final workshop
benefit of grant for NGO
REC grant selection and No comment
project administration
Communication results
Limited at time of interview. Material will be prepared (maps and reports) that will address a range of stakeholders
(government, local administration and the local population.)
Promotion of the DRP
Limited at time of interview.
Attractiveness for DRP
Limited at time of interview, but potential for maps etc may offer some interesting material.
Other comment
Outputs would be of interest to the UNDP/GEF Prut River PDF-A proposal process especially with emphasis now on toxic
substances

62

Romania
Project Title
Budget
Main environmental issue DRP Verifier
Association for Ecology
Clean Waters, without nutrients through

and Sustainable
natural fertilisers. Private and animal waste
9,000 USD
Nutrients and Best Agricultural
11 Oct. 06
Peter Whalley
Development Iasi
disposal
Practices
NGO project information Project developed a range of criteria for including local farms in this project number of owners of land, visibility of project
and support from local authorities. Collaborated (used results) from the World Bank APC project, Prepared plans for local
manure platforms that were well signposted in the district (had different approach to WB project which had large platforms
here the emphasis was on local platforms that reduced travelling and hopefully minimised effort from local farmers/small
holdings).
Implementation process
Involved as partners local agricultural advisors. Have worked with different villages in an attempt to broaden impact of project

and approached farmers etc. through educational programmes with schools. Have prepared a guidance document on BAP;
leaflets on the approach have been widely distributed,
Local environment
Reduction of nutrients
benefit of NGO actions
Local institutional
NGO has been strengthened and is successfully co-operating with NGO from MD (Ungheni) on an EC Cross-Border Co-
benefit of grant for NGO
operation project.
REC selection & admin.
No comment
Communication results
Workshops, meetings (reached 700 households with animals and farmers), CD with Powerpoint presentation. Mayors have
encouraged links to WB project and have utilised the photographs of bad practice (manure handling) at their offices to
publicise the work
Promotion of the DRP
Limited
Attractiveness for DRP
Good work but limited. Strong aspect is the co-operation with the WB project
Other comment

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
63

ROMANIA
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
Associat. for Sustainable
Preventing and Reducing Nutrient Pollution

Development, Slatina
from Agro-Zoo Technical Sources in the Olt USD 13,230
Water pollution by agriculture
9 October 2006
River Basin
Mark Redman
NGO project information Founded in 2001, this small and active NGO based in Olt County focuses upon local community participation and effective
(objectives, progress of
communication as key tools for sustainable development. The objectives of this project were to:
activities, action quality
· develop a pilot Local Action Plan (LAP) for supporting implementation of the obligations of the Nitrate Directive;
and their environmental
· promote awareness of the pilot LAP and its associated benefits, and;
relevance in relation to the · provide training on pilot LAP as a "model" for replication to other communities.
DRP key issues)
These objectives were very relevant to DRP issues and were originally identified in response to the need of local communities
for a) much greater awareness, education and information about agriculture and water pollution issues and b) the
interpretation of the very complex Code of Good Agricultural Practice for Romania in a more simple form that was easily
understandable by local people.
Implementation process These objectives were pursued through the following project activities:
Stakeholder cooperation,
· Establish Working Group with representatives from the Regional Environmental Protection Agency, the offices of local
media work, relation to
majors, local Water Directorate and the regional offices of the Ministry of Agriculture. This group met once per month for
ICPDR, DEF, government
4-5 months;
· Use expert opinion to analyse local situation the project area falls within a designated Nitrate Vulnerable Zone and
there was plenty of general information available on agriculture and water quality issues etc. The main problems
identified were the lack of: a) information on EU/national legislation and the impact this would have upon local farming
communities especially regarding animal production systems and waste disposal, and; b) easily understandable
technical advice on how to make effective use of animal manures;
· Develop and consult on pilot Local Action Plan (LAP) a "local plan against pollution" was prepared by the Working
Group during the 4-5 month period that it met and was presented to local community members and leaders three times
for consultation. The main framework of the LAP was a communal waste management system involving separation of
wastes, collection and transport, storage and composting. Interest amongst the local community was very low at first
since people did perceive any benefits for themselves, but when the environmental benefits were re-presented in terms of
health and economic benefits then interest increased significantly;
· Provide training on LAPs a training programme for 12 communes in the north of Olt County was under preparation in
association with the Regional Environmental Protection Agency for November 2006. This is the region of the county in
which most small-scale livestock production is located. It was also planned to present various options for stimulating the
uptake of LAPs by using local financial instruments such as a simple communal tax system
Local environment
No direct environmental benefits were generated during the short time period of the project, but the waste management
benefit of NGO actions
systems proposed were apparently recognised as being practical and viable solutions by participants in the project. The
problem is financial both obtaining the necessary external funds to cover the start-up costs and developing a local system
(e.g. a local waste management tax) for covering the on-going operational costs. It is estimated that 7 of the 12 communes
participating in the training have the potential to attract/generate the necessary co-financing.
Local institutional
This project was clearly a good opportunity for the Association for Sustainable Development to continue its work in Olt County

64

ROMANIA
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
Ecological Club UNESCO
Cooperation to Reduce Nutrient Pollution

12 Oct., 2006
Pro Natura, Bucharest
from Agricultural Sources in Ilfov County
USD 9,600
Water pollution by agriculture
Mark Redman
NGO project information A well-established (since 1991) and active national NGO that works mainly in the field of nature conservation, especially in
(objectives, progress of
the management of protected areas. This was their first project on agricultural pollution and represented a diversification of
activities, action quality
their interests to engage with a wider range of environmental issues during the critical period of Romania's accession to the
and their environmental
EU.
relevance in relation to the The project was based upon close co-operation between the NGO and the Regional Environmental Protection Agency
DRP key issues)
(REPA) of Ilfov County (which is located around Bucharest). The County is crossed by several rivers, has a series of
important lakes/ wetlands and due to its history of intensive agriculture includes 7 areas designated as Nitrate Vulnerable
Zones (NVZs) in accordance with Romanian implementation of the EU Nitrates Directive.
The goal of the project was to "contribute to the reduction of nitrate pollution in Ilfov county through inter-sectoral cooperation
in the elaboration of an action plan for the vulnerable areas and promotion in the local communities of best agricultural
practices and also the role of the wetlands". The project objectives were to:
· elaborate an Action Plan for all areas vulnerable to agricultural pollution in Ilfov County (not only the NVZs);
· develop local capacity through training for farmers/agricultural advisers in the communities located within these
vulnerable areas, and;
· initiate a public awareness campaign to promote the concept of Good/Best Agricultural Practice based on distributing
printed materials and organizing public meetings in the communities where the vulnerable areas are located.
Implementation process
These objectives were implemented via the following project activities:
Stakeholder cooperation,
· Prepare first draft of Action Plan a small working group involving representatives from REPA, the Ministry of
media work, relation to
Agriculture and the National Soils Institute was established to formulate a draft Action Plan for those areas vulnerable to
ICPDR, DEF, government
agricultural pollution in Ilfov County this included the designated the NVZs, but also all rivers and wetlands. The Action
Plan aimed to provide a clear and simple framework for planning the necessary actions for avoiding agricultural pollution
at a local/community level this was considered particularly important for helping to close the "information gap" between
local people and policy-makers at regional and national level.
· Consult and finalise Action Plan - a stakeholders meeting was organised on 18th April 2006 to present and discuss the
Action Plan. A total of 18 people participated in addition to the working group, including representatives of other local
government departments, farmers' organisations and local NGOs.
· Organise training two training sessions were organised during June 2006 for local farmers, local government officials,
advisers etc. This was the first time that issues relating to agricultural pollution etc. were introduced to the local
community and they stimulated much interest the main theme was BAP and this was specifically linked to the
conservation of the local wetlands, the health of the local community and the profitability of local agriculture.
· Prepare printed materials three simple information materials on BAP were prepared: an A4, full colour poster (5
copies), a simple, single page, full colour brochure (1000 copies) and a 12 page, A5, full colour booklet (1000 copies). All
materials were designed to stimulate interest and to provoke people to ask further.
· Organise public meetings - the printed materials were distributed at public meetings in each of the NVZ areas, the first

66

ROMANIA
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
Ecological Club UNESCO
Cooperation to Reduce Nutrient Pollution

12 Oct., 2006
Pro Natura, Bucharest
from Agricultural Sources in Ilfov County
USD 9,600
Water pollution by agriculture
Mark Redman
was held in early October 2006 and the remaining six were organised for late October/November.
Local environment
No direct environmental benefits were generated during the short time period of the project since it was focused mainly on
benefit of NGO actions
planning, capacity development and public awareness activities however, these do have good potential to generate long-
term environmental benefits.
Local institutional
Since this was the NGO's first project on agriculture and water pollution it was a useful opportunity to learn about local
benefit of the grant for the agricultural issues in more detail and to co-operate more closely with relevant agencies and institutions especially the
NGO
Regional Environmental Protection Agency. With the experience now accumulated they are keen to prepare and/or co-
operate on other projects relating to agriculture and water pollution. Also the links with the REPA has extended their network
of experts and will be useful regarding their core interest in nature conservation, including the implementation of Natura 2000
etc.
REC grant selection and
No problems reported all application and reporting procedures very clear and straightforward.
project administration
Communication results
Reported to be effective a few newspaper articles
Promotion of the DRP
DRP and REC logos clearly displayed on poster, brochure and booklet
Attractiveness for DRP
High a simple project, with easily achievable objectives in the limited time available. The emphasis upon process and the
development of a framework that can be elaborated with more specific technical actions is an interesting and useful approach
that could be easily disseminated and replicated by other NGOs at a local level/community.
Other comment
Lack of networking with other DRP-related projects in RO the NGO was aware of the other national SGP projects, but not:
· the two regional projects implemented by Earth Friends (No. 21728 - Best Agricultural Practice in my Farm) and the
Romanian Ornithological Society (No. 21724 - Cross-sectoral Cooperation for Good Water Quality Management on
Lower Danube Farms). This was a lost opportunity for some useful networking and possible combination of effort. It
would have been useful to encourage greater contact/communication between national and regional projects within DRP-
SGP, and;
· activities undertaken in Romania under Phase 2 of the agricultural components (outputs 1.2 & 1.3) of the DRP. There
were lots of useful materials produced by Carlbro that could have been very effectively disseminated through a project
such as this.

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
67

ROMANIA
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
Alma-Ro Association,

10 Oct., 2006
Bucharest
Clean Land, Rich Man!
USD 9,670
Water pollution by agriculture
Mark Redman
NGO project information ALMA-RO Association was founded in 2001 and focuses upon promoting the importance of civil liberties and fundamental
(objectives, progress of
human rights as the basis for sustainable development at a national and regional level. This project was undertaken in
activities, action quality
Calarasi County in partnership with FORDOC the Regional Training Centre for Local Public Administration who were also
and their environmental
local partners in the well-known World Bank Agricultural Pollution Control Project (APCP) that was undertaken in the region.
relevance in relation to the Indeed this project was designed to build upon the APCP which, although widely respected as a good project, suffered from
DRP key issues)
very poor follow-up at local level the biggest problem being that although the local communities were well-equipped by the
APCP with a communal manure management system* there was only limited information or incentive available for local
people on why and how it was necessary to continue to work co-operatively to maintain the system. FORDOC implemented
a small information project after the APCP finished in 2004 which involved an "information caravan" visiting 24 communes
with basic leaflets and simple training on the obligations of the Nitrate Directive, but much confusion still remained amongst
the 450 beneficiaries.
ALMA-RO therefore designed a more targeted project based upon their understanding of community dynamics and the
function of public adminstrations. The project objectives were to:
· Increase the population's and decision-makers' awareness on water pollution with nitrates in the rural area of the Calarasi
county;
· Improve local authorities' and farmers' expertise on agricultural and environmental policies;
· Promote good practices in agriculture that have a positive impact on water quality.

* Note: The APCP established a communal manure management system consisting of 3 communal manure platforms (each with 4
employees) serving 18 villages in which farm animal waste was collected and stored in a total of 3 000 individual manure platforms.
Implementation process
The project aimed to target a total of project 680 beneficiaries (including farmers, local public authorities, citizens and
Stakeholder cooperation,
subsistence farmers) in a total of 10 communes, including 7 involved previously in the APCP. The project activities were
media work, relation to
implemented in 9 months from January - October 2006 and included:
ICPDR, DEF, government
· Publications an A3 full colour poster plus an A5, 56 page, black and white booklet presenting a simplified and more
practical interpretation of the Romanian Code of Good Agricultural Practice
· Training two 2 day training courses for farmers and public authorities led by an environmental/organic farming expert
contracted specifically for the training courses
· Information campaign all 10 communes were targeted with information materials and a community meetingthis was
targeted specifically at local householders and subsistence farmers with individual manure platforms
· Media campaign - all activities were press released and the project concluded with a press conference with
representatives invited from the main local/regional media
Local environment
The environmental benefits of the project were potentially very high because it was building upon the existing APCP project
benefit of the NGO
and sustaining the existing benefit associated with this in reality however the level of engagement by the local authorities
actions
was relatively low since they were suffering from "nitrate fatigue" and therefore tired of the issue. Apparently the level of

68

ROMANIA
Project Title
Budget
Main Environmental Issue
DRP Verifier
Alma-Ro Association,

10 Oct., 2006
Bucharest
Clean Land, Rich Man!
USD 9,670
Water pollution by agriculture
Mark Redman
commitment by local people was disappointingly low and the local majors especially did not perceive it as a high priority when
there were other more important short-term social and economic issues to address. It is likely that a different long-term
approach is needed working more sympathetically with the local authorities on a range of environmental/health issues rather
than continuing to push on agricultural pollution.
Local institutional
The project continued to build the capacity of the NGO and to secure its profile as an innovative and progressive organisation
benefit of grant for NGO
committed to important social and environmental issues
REC grant selection and
No problems reported all procedures very straightforward and good links were established with REC Romania
project administration
Communication results
Good coverage of the project was achieved in the local media which was already sensitised to the issues because of the
previous success and high profile of the APCP project
Promotion of the DRP
High DRP and REC logos clearly presented on all project communications and publications, including the NGO website:
http://alma-ro.ngo.ro/indexen.shtml
Attractiveness for DRP
Medium the project attempted to sustain and add value to the existing World Bank project in Calarasi and is therefore
intrinsically interesting to the DRP. But the approach is not easily replicable because of the specific circumstances
associated with the APCP
Other comment
Lack of networking with other DRP-related projects in RO the NGO was aware of the other national SGP projects, but not:
· the two regional projects implemented by Earth Friends (No. 21728 - Best Agricultural Practice in my Farm) and the
Romanian Ornithological Society (No. 21724 - Cross-sectoral Cooperation for Good Water Quality Management on
Lower Danube Farms). This was a lost opportunity for some useful networking and possible combination of effort. It
would have been useful to encourage greater contact/communication between national and regional projects within DRP-
SGP, and;
· activities undertaken in Romania under Phase 2 of the agricultural components (outputs 1.2 & 1.3) of the DRP. There
were lots of useful materials produced by Carlbro that could have been very effectively disseminated through a project
such as this.

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
69

ANNEX III Re-assessment of NGO Creative Project

Update on progress of SK Small Grants project Construction of Small WWTP by NGO Creative, Kosice
(interview by Alexander Zinke on 6 October 2006)

The meeting served to learn what happened since the last interview in winter 2005 (Round 1 SGP evaluation) and after the DRP has granted
an additional USD 7,000 to the project. Specific question was to find out why the project is still not finished (plan was to end it in spring 2005):
Background from Round 1: This NGO is realizing pilot projects for alternative wastewater treatment in small rural communities, which will not get any
support for WWT from the EU. Two projects were supported by the Heinz Endowment Fund (USA) in Tichy Potok (for 150 people, 2 treatment steps, well
operating since November 2004; USD 60,000) and in Krasna luka (700 people, 3 steps, under construction, USD 200,000 but still need of a co-funder).
Their technology uses simple processes (already tested in Czechia) without electricity, which meet emission standards for BOD and suspended solids. This
secures low maintenance costs and user fees.
The DRP project is located at Nalepkovo (600 m asl., in Spis region 75 km west of Kosice) where wet meadows of Hnilec river (Natura 2000 site,
downstream the Slovak Paradise national park) are affected by sewage from 5 houses (17 people): A special septic tank (Czech system with 3
compartments) shall retain the solids and improve water quality (BOD standard). Below, a 90 m² reed bed (Phragmites + Phalaris) shall retain the nutrients.
Gained commitment of the municipality: They build the collector (USD 11,000) and provide the land for the WWTP next to the river. This WWTP is a pilot
activity for Slovakia. For promotion, the NGO prepares a big broshure presenting all 3 pilot sites (Slovak + English) as well as a webpage (both ready only in
Jan. 2007). These pilot projects have visible and measurable environmental benefits.

The big project delays were mainly caused by the slow handling by local authorities. In fact, this first-ever approval in Slovakia of a constructed
wetland WWTP ( as a secondary treatment of communal sewage; there are 3 approved CW of tertiary treatment, one being Krasna luka) was
granted only on 26 July 2006 by the sub-regional district authority in Gelnica (the regional authority was not ready to approve such a new
plant...). Construction works started in mid October and ended in late November. The project site is located in the village of Zadný Hámor
(some 30 houses, with the top 5 houses to be treated (currently 1 septic and 4 holding tanks), as part of the commune of Nálepkovo (2000
inhabitants, 50% Roma), an old mining town (iron ore) at 550 m asl. A Natura 2000 area (Cerveny potok swamp) is located 600 m downstream
the site; the pollution impact in this river section is measurable (see last column of the table below).The project design had to be revised,
because the detail planning showed differences between the cadastre map and the physical site reality. As a result of frustrating negotiations,
the WWTP was moved by 15 m (requires bridging a small creek) to be accessible for the truck emptying the tank (once in 3-4 years; sludge for
agricultural use). The commune is committed to build the new sewer pipes, each house will pay for its access to the collector. The sewage
disposal tariff will be fixed in the future. Total project costs for the NGO Creative much exceed the available budget (the original budget of $
15,000 was cut back by REC-SK to 5,600; then in 2005 DRP granted USD 5,000 but new minimum USD 1,600 are still not covered).

70

Future: In an extension project, an underground sand filter shall be built to connect another 6 houses of the village. This type requires less
space than the constructed wetland but more maintenance and protection against river flooding.

Update on the other WWTP projects of Creative
1. The Tichy potok WWTP works perfectly for 3 years: 40,000 were invested to reconstruct existing pipes and 2 old septic tanks and to add
3 new sand filters (anaerobic biological treatment). The effluent runs into 4 small fish ponds (= aeration) before it empties into Torysa creek.
The entire system works via gravity (no electricity needed!). Thus, maintenance is reduced to daily water quality checks (also every 3 months
by Environment Inspectorate). The monitored water quality discharged is very good compared to Slovak standards (see table below!).

2. Krasna luka: This WWTP (north-west of Presov) will treat sewage of the entire village and was opened in November 2006. It consists of a 2
steps WWTP (Imhof tanks) and 3 constructed wetlands (1,500 m²). Costs for this tertiary treatment are at 130,000 (from Heinz Endowment
Foundation and SK Environment Fund).

Pollution limits
Slovak limits for
Slovak limits for discharges
Tichy potok WWTP
Slovak limits for
Hnilec river
and small WWTP
discharges into
into groundwater
(150 population
discharges at
water quality at
loads
surface water
equivalents)
Nalepkovo WWTP
Zadny Hamor (60-
(< 50 pop. equival.)
70 houses) from
July 2006
Average
Max. mg/l
Average mg/l
Max. mg/l
mg/l on
mg/l on
Average
Max. mg/l
Rkm 42.5
Rkm 45.5
mg/l
24 May 2006
10 Feb 2006
mg/l
COD 135
170

23
33

6.9

BOD
30
60
25
50
9
18
40 70 1.5 2
(20 for 20-50 p.e.)
(20 for 20-50 p.e.)
Suspended solids
30
60
25
50
7
13

7

N/NH4

9.16
23

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
71

ANNEX IV Lists of all granted national and regional NGO projects

Danube Regional Project, Round II, Regional Grants

Project number: 21719
Project title: "Barriers and Bridges": Barriers to Waste, Nutrients and Chemicals
Bridges for Communities, Sectors and Information Budget: 28,000
Project leader:
Laszlo Stoll
Leading NGO:
First Partner:
Second Partner:
HOLOCEN Nature Protection
SILVANUS Ecological Association
Dialogue for the Communities Public
Association
407515 Sancraiu, jud. Cluj
Welfare Association
Kossuth u. 13
Sancraiu 331-332
3530 Miskolc
3525 Miskolc
Tel: +40264257662
Malomszog u. 2
Hungary
Fax: +40264257588
Tel: +36302529121
Tel: +3646508944
E-mail: parpi2001@yahoo.com,
Fax:
Fax: +3646352010
silvoko@yahoo.com
E-mail: ari@freemail.hu
Email: holocen@holocen.hu,

stoll@holocen.hu

Project number: 21722
Project title: Strengthening NGO participation in EU WFD implementation in Sava River Basin
Budget: 50,000
Project leader:
Irma Popovic
Leading NGO:
First Partner:
Second Partner:
Green Action
Center for Environmentally
DPPVN - Society of Bird Research
Frankopanska 1, p. p. 952
Sustainable Development CESD
and Nature Protection
10000 Zagreb
71000 Sarajevo
2327 Race
Croatia
S. Tomica 1
Ptujska c. 91
Tel: +38514813096
Tel: +38733207949
Tel: +38641699268
Fax: +38514813096
Fax: +38733207949
Fax: +386027883051
Email: za@zelena-akcija.hr
E-mail: coorsa@bih.net.ba
E-mail: milan.vogrin@guest.arnes.si
Third Partner:

Danube Environmental Forum Serbia
and Montenegro
11000 Belgrade

Andricev venac 2
Tel: +381113231374
Fax: +381113231374
E-mail: defyu@eunet.yu

Project number: 21727
Project title: Preserving the water by promoting diapers friendly for earth and baby
Budget: 35,000
Project leader:
Spelca Morojna
Leading NGO:
First Partner:
Association Storky
RODA - Parents in action
Leona Zalaznika ulica 4
10000 Zagreb
2000 Maribor, Kosaki
Savska cesta 80
Slovenia
Tel: +38516177500

Tel: +386(0)22512411
Fax:
Fax:
E-mail: roda@roda.hr
Email: info@storklja.si

72

Project number: 21724
Project title: Cross-sectoral cooperation for good water quality management on lower Danube
farms Budget: 30,000
Project leader:
Yuliya Grigorova
Leading NGO:
First Partner:
Association for Integrated Rural
Romanian Ornithological Society
Development
400336 Cluj
str. Hristo Belchev 21, 6th floor,
str. Gh. Dima 49/2
office 80
Tel: +40213184701

1000 Sofia
Fax: +40213184701
Bulgaria
E-mail: office@sor.ro
Tel: 35929809837
Fax: 35929809837
Email: julia_aicc@yahoo.co.uk

Project number: 21728
Project title: Best agricultural practice in my farm Budget: 35,000
Project leader:
Emma Gileva
Leading NGO:
First Partner:
Second Partner:
Black Sea NGO Network
Prietenii Pamantului (Earth Friends)
Eco Counselling Center Cahul
str. Sheinovo 12
800025 Galati
Cahul
9000 Varna
str. Portului bl. Siret 4, sc. 7 ap. 109
str. Stefan cel Mare 21/28
Bulgaria
Tel: +40236462564
Tel: +37329921478
Tel: 35952615856
Fax:
Fax:
Fax: 35952602047
E-mail: earthfriends@rdslink.ro
E-mail: arturneb@hotmail.com
Email: reg_off@bseanetwork.org

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
73

PROJECT
UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project
COMPONENT
LIST OF DRP NATIONAL GRANTS SELECTED (ROUND II)
ORGANIZATION
PROJECT TITLE
CONTACT INFO
PROJECT LEADER
Budget /
Comment
Bosnia and Herzegovina

Local Initiative for Development
Improvement of Water Protection for I Krajiskog korpusa bb, 78000 Banja
Vesna Marinkovic-
7,400
LIR, Banja Luka
Farms and Slaughter Houses in
Luka, tel +387 51 329 750, fax +387
Vojvodic, vesnamv@lir.ba
the Sava River Basin
51 329 751
Center for Environmentally
Cleaner production in food industry Stjepana Tomica 1a, 71000 Sarajevo, Jasmina Bjelavac,
5,200
Sustainable Development
tel/fax +387 33 212 466
jasminka.bjelavac@heis.co
CESD, Sarajevo
m.ba
Association "Mother and Child", Increasing the participation of the
Trg Slobode br. 1, 73260 Rudo, tel
Danka Grubisa,
7,000
Rudo
public in reducing the nitrification
+387 58 711 700, fax +387 58 711 690 majkaidijete@spinter.net
through educating and informing
women and the youth of the upper
Drina River Basin
EKO-LOGIC, Banja Luka
Reforestation in the Vrbas River
Vidovdanska 37, 78000 Banja Luka,
Dragan Comic, academic-
9,972
Basin to Prevent Erosion Improve
tel +387 51 219 343, fax +387 51 217 eco-logic@blic.net
Water Quality ha ??
843
Development association
Save the Spreca River (Sava River
M I Z Crnogorevica 5, 75000 Tuzla,
Enes Drljevic,
13,400
NERDA/Ekopot/Radio
Basin)
tel/fax +387 35 274 385
nerda5@yahoo.com
Kameleon, Tuzla
Awaren. agric. pollution
Ecological Society
Let Clean Water Flow Down the
Trg oslobodenja 24, 74400 Derventa,
Miodrag Radovanovic,
7,000
Ekologika/NGOs Forum
Ukrina, Sava and Danube Rivers in
tel +387 65 667 330
radanovic@doboj.net
Derventa
to the Black Sea awaren. on

mining+agric.
Bulgaria

Intereco-21 Federation, Sofia
Cleaning the Danube River Valley in 1404 Sofia, Kostenski vodopad Str., bl. Maria Zlateva,
5,800
Lom Municipality from Industrial,
5A, ap. 32, phone: 00359 2 599 810,
drmariazlateva@mail.bg
Agricultural and Municipal Wastes.
fax: 00359 2 980 88 16
Poplar and Willow Forestation
Euromodel Association, Sofia
Reconstruction of Wet Land Habitats 1000 Sofia, 12 Bistritsa Str., fl. 1,
Emilia Petrova,
5,900
in Oriahovo Municipality
phone/fax: 00359 2 980 88 16
euromodel@mail.bg

74

PROJECT
UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project
COMPONENT
LIST OF DRP NATIONAL GRANTS SELECTED (ROUND II)
ORGANIZATION
PROJECT TITLE
CONTACT INFO
PROJECT LEADER
Budget /
Comment
World for everyone Association, To Stop Danube River Nutrient
7500 Silistra, POBox 283, phone/fax:
Irena Marinova,
5,700
Silistra
Pollution
00359 86 820 487
wfa@abv.bg
BAP and RBM
Regional Initiative Association,
Improvement of the Environmental
1000 Sofia, 149 Rakovska Str.,
Greta Draganova,
6,200
Sofia
Status of the Danube River
phone/fax: 00359 2 986 0510
sri@mail.bg
Timok valley (Bregovo)
Bulgaria in Europe Association,
Establishment of Informational and
3700 Vidin, zh.k. Hristo Botev, bl. 14,
Maria Velikova,
6,300
Vidin
Educational Centre in the Town of
vh. V, ap. 18, phone/fax :00359 94 37 bgeu@mail.bg
Vidin
595
European Environmental
Organizing a Competition for
1000 Sofia, Slaveikov Sq. #4, fl. 4,
Nevena Pramatarova,
5,000
Festival Foundation, Sofia
Movies and Documentaries about
office 401, phone: 00359 2 987 62 87, greenwave@euroekofest.o
the Danube Basin Pollution
fax: 00359.2.952 62 4
rg
Bulgarian Biodiversity
More Space for Rivers and Safety
1303 Sofia, 75 Sredna gora Str.,
Petko Tzvetkov,
5,100
Foundation, Sofia
for People
phone/fax: 00359 2 920 9975
bbf@biodiversity.bg
Mapping of flood sites
DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
75

PROJECT
UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project
COMPONENT
LIST OF DRP NATIONAL GRANTS SELECTED (ROUND II)
ORGANIZATION
PROJECT TITLE
CONTACT INFO
PROJECT LEADER
Budget /
Comment
Croatia

Brod Eco-association "Zemlja"
A Cleaner Sava River Through
Trg pobjede 7, 35000 Slavonski Brod, Karmela Fontana Pudic,
11,950
(Earth); Slavonski Brod
Cooperation
tel +385 98 731243, fax +385 35
karmela.fontana.pudic@sb
Communal WWT
440236
.htnet.hr;
tomislav.lukic@sb.htnet.hr
Club of Food Technologists,
Informing the Public of the Benefits
Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, tel +385 Vera Dostal,
15,000
Biotechnologists and
of the Implemen-tation of Industrial 1 4826250, fax +385 1 4826251
vdostal@pbf.hr
Nutritionists, Zagreb
Waste Water Treatment
Technologies (Ecological and
Economic effects)
Europe House Vukovar, Vukovar Promoting Methods of Eco and
Ljudevita Gaja 12, 32000 Vukovar, tel Dragana Draskovic,
11,970
Organic Agriculture - 2nd phase
+385 32 450096, fax +385 32 450098 europski.dom.vukovar@vk.
htnet.hr
"HYLA" Society for the
Let's Learn about Amphibians - The Demetrova 1, 10000 Zagreb, tel +385 Dragica Salamon,
9,945
Protection and Research of
First Ones on the Frontline
1 4851700, fax +385 1 4851644
hyla@hyla.hr;
Amphibians and Reptiles,
dada777hr@yahoo.com
Zagreb
Czech Republic

DAPHNE CR - Institute of
Meadow society - Nutrient Indicators Husova 45/622, 37005 Ceske
Zaboj Hrazsky,
9,300
Applied Ecology
in the River Basin
Budejovice, tel +420 776 053573,
zaboj.hrazsky@daphne.cz
(motivate farmers)
+420 385 311019
Czech Nature Conservation
STOP for Phosphates - Clean Water Panska 9, 60200 Brno, tel +420 542
Vera Pospisilikova,
7,500
Union 54/44 Veronica
not only in the South Moravia Region 422757, fax +420 542 422752
vera.pospisilikova@veronik
awareness + lobbying
a.cz
Arnika - Toxic waste programme Convention for Danube protection
Chlumova 17, 13000 Praha, tel +420
Milan Havel,
8,000
and toxic pollution in rivers in the
222 781471, fax +420 222 782808
milan.havel@arnika.org
Czech Republic - campaign

76

PROJECT
UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project
COMPONENT
LIST OF DRP NATIONAL GRANTS SELECTED (ROUND II)
ORGANIZATION
PROJECT TITLE
CONTACT INFO
PROJECT LEADER
Budget /
Comment
Renesance of Country
Moravian Carst - A Model Site of
Druzstevni 3, 67904 Adamov, tel +420 Jozef Janco,
7,700
Association
Protected Surface and Underground 516 446623
jozef.janco@quick.cz
Carstic Waters in the Danube Basin.
Bioinstitute o.p.s., Olomouc
Organic Agriculture for Water
Krizkovskeho 8, 77147 Olomouc, tel
Pavlina Samsonova,
7,500
Protection Instruc-tional
+420 585 631179
bioinstitut@seznam.cz
Presentation and its use for the
Morava River B.
Hungary

Drava river Alliance
Clean the River Drava!
8851 Gyekenyes, Jozsef A. u. 1. tel:
Miklos Toldi
4,650
Pollution mapping + public.
+3682 496060
besemiki@axelero.hu
Center for Environmental
Chemicals free Zone along the
1094 Budapest, Angyal u. 15/b tel:
Ferenc Laczo dr
3,256
Studies (CES)
Átalér river
+361 4558055
laczo@ktk-ces.hu
Organic agric.
Pilis Nature Conservation
Nyáros Island Meadows
2000 Szentendre, Sztaravodai u. 52.
Matyas Prommer
5,580
Association (PITE)
Rehabilitation
tel: +36 33 415787
mprommer@yahoo.com
Tavirózsa Association
Szdrákos Creek Program - Phase 2 2112 Veresegyhaz, Huba u. 43. tel:
Sandor Tatar
4,650
Sustain. water + land mngt.
+361 2571100
tatars@mail.inext.hu
Magosfa Alapítvány
Ipoly River Cleaning Action and
2600 Vac, Chazar A. u. 17. tel: +36 27 Marta Kurucz
4,650
Environmentally-Friendly
511 426
magosfa@magosfa.hu
Technologies Exhibition
+ mapping waste dumps
Pisztráng Kör Association
Water, The Cradle of Life -
9200 Mosomagyarovar, Hataror u. 7.
Zoltan Fuzfa
3,720
Interactive Exhibition and
tel: +3696 206887
fuzfa@hu.inter.net
Alternative School Classes
DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
77

PROJECT
UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project
COMPONENT
LIST OF DRP NATIONAL GRANTS SELECTED (ROUND II)
ORGANIZATION
PROJECT TITLE
CONTACT INFO
PROJECT LEADER
Budget /
Comment
Esztergomi Környezetkultúra
Cooperation for the Danube in the
2500 Esztergom, Bajcsy Zs. U. 4. tel:
Attila Szuhi
4,190
Association
Esztergomi Small-Region 
+36 33 400 150
ekoku@zpok.hu
hazard. sewage
REFLEX Gyr
INFO-Lanc Portal - Danube Watch
9024 Gyor, Bartok Bela u. 7. tel: +36
Peter Nagy reflex@c3.hu
4,650
System, Access to Information
96 316 192
Holocen Nature Conservation
Sajó-Hernád Rivers Flood and Water 3525 Miskolc, Kossuth u. 13. tel:
Viktor Toth
5,580
Association
Pollution Priorities
+3646 508944
holocen@holocen.hu
Integr. Plan./ stakeh. forum
Clean Air Working Group
Chemical Reduction and Pollution
1075 Budapest, Karoly korut 3/a III/2.
Gergely Simon
5,580
Prevention Campaign
tel: +361 4110509
simong@levego.hu
demonstration to farmers
Friends of The Earth Hungary -
National development Plan 2007-13 1091 Budapest, Ulloi út 91/b tel: +361 Akos Eger info@mtvsz.hu 3,490
Hungarian Alliance of
- Public Participation in the
2167297
Conservationists
Preparation of Water Projects
Moldova

Cahul Ecologic Consultations
Public Involvement in the Process of 21/28 Stefan cel Mare str., Cahul, MD- Artur Nebunu,
8,080
Centre
Nutrient Reduction in the Lower Prut 3900, tel +373 299 33 105, fax. +373
arturneb@hotmail.com
Basin and Nutrient Pollu-tion
299 21 478
Prevention through Complex
Monitoring of the Quality of the
Environment
Public Association ,,Calitatea
Reactivation of the Seconda-ry
3 Academiei str., of 422, Chisinau, tel. Raisa Lozan,
14,000
Mediului"
(Biological) Water Purifying Stage + 373 22 739614
rmlozan@yahoo.com
in the Wastewater Treatment Plant
sandu_mr@yahoo.com
of Ungheni District
Public Association ,,Cutezatorul" The Reduction of Nutrient Pollution
50 Stefan cel Mare str., of 121,
Victor Cimpoies,
10,000
in the Danube Hydrographical Basin Falesti, tel./fax. +373 259 22951
veco@rambler.ru
through the Promotion and Use of
Good Agriculture Practices

78

PROJECT
UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project
COMPONENT
LIST OF DRP NATIONAL GRANTS SELECTED (ROUND II)
ORGANIZATION
PROJECT TITLE
CONTACT INFO
PROJECT LEADER
Budget /
Comment
Public Association ,,Mediul i
The Danube and I
24 Moscova bld., 12, Chisinau, MD -
Emilia Malai,
7,920
Sntatea"
Media campaign
2045, tel./fax. +373 22 322345
emi77md@yahoo.com
Serbia

Eko eho, Nis
Nisava My River
Bojnicka 20, 18000 Nis, Brzi Brod, tel Tatjana Cvetkovic,
7,000
+381 18 49484, +381 18 233176
eco_echo_nis@yahoo.com
TERRAS Organic Food
Organic Agriculture A step forward Trg cara Jovana Nenada 15, 24000
Snjezana Mitrovic,
15,000
Association, Subotica
to protect the Danube basin
Subotica, tel +381 24 554600, fax
terras@terras.org.yu
Education campaign
+381 24 553116
Association of Mountaineers
Wastewater Treatment in Rural
Kneza Milosa 11, 32000 Cacak, tel/fax Biljana Starcevic,
9,000
Kablar, Cacak
Households
+381 32 344289
starcevicbiljana@yahoo.co
m
Initiative for Democratic
Promotion of Best Available
Bulevar Despota Stefana 74,
Emilijan Mohora,
12,000
Transition (DTI), Belgrade
Techniques with alternative
Belgrade, tel/fax +381 11 3293873
office@dti.org.yu
industrial waste water treatment
methods which enable efficient
elimination of nutrients and toxic
matters from intensive farming and
food production sectors
Union of Ecologists UNECO,
Campaign Used Motor Oil should
Fransa de Parea bb, Paracin, tel +381 Vladimir Jankovic,
7,000
Regional Center Paracin
not become our Nightmare
35 564369, fax +381 35 562526
ekopn@ptt.yu
Slovakia

Friends of the Earth Slovakia
The Future Without Toxic Pollution in Alzbetina 53, 04001 Kosice, tel/fax
Ladislav Hegyi,
9,000
the Danube Basin POPs in Sala
+421 55 6771677
spz@priateliazeme.sk
DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
79

PROJECT
UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project
COMPONENT
LIST OF DRP NATIONAL GRANTS SELECTED (ROUND II)
ORGANIZATION
PROJECT TITLE
CONTACT INFO
PROJECT LEADER
Budget /
Comment
town
Slovak union of nature and
Waters of Kysuce basin
Namestie Slobody 30/28, 02201
Rudolf Gerat
9,000
landscape protectors, regional
Stakeh. campaign
Cadca, tel +421 41 4324814
board Cadca
Civic Association Tatry
The Streams are not Sewers II
KEMI 627/5, 03104 Liptovsky
Rudolf Pado,
9,800
Campaign with schools etc
Mikulas, tel/fax +421 44 5531027
wolf@mail.viapvt.sk
Civic Association Umbra
Revitalization of Cilizsky Stream in Heyrovskeho 6, 84103 Bratislava, tel Maros Sirotiak,
7,200
the Common Interest of the Partners +421 907 353181
umbra@chengenet.sk
of the Danubian Fluvial Coalition
Regional protection association
Protection and Renovation of the
Godrova 3/b, 81106, kanc. Sankova
Tomas Kusik,
8,000
Bratislava
Danube's Midland Delta
96, 83106 Bratislava, tel/fax +421 2
broz@broz.sk
Restoration, protection and
55562693
awareness raising
Bohatska sanca civic
The Removal of Nitrogen and
Orechova 7, 94703 Hurbanovo-
Marek Sadovsky,
7,000
association
Fostering of Communication in the
Bohata, tel +421 35 7610247
froraobal@stonline.sk
Zitava Basin
Communic. + poll. reduct.
Slovenia

Institute for Environmental
The Effective Protection of Water in Savska 5, 1230 Domzale, tel +386 1
Marta Vahtar,
10,000
Protection Promotion
Rural Areas in Podonavje, Using
7225210, fax +386 1 7225215
marta.vahtar@guest.arnes.
Ecoremediation farmer education
si
Association of Family Members
Preserving the Water by Promoting
Leona Zalaznika 4, 2000 Maribor, tel
Spelca Morojna,
10,000
»Stork«
the Production and Use of
+386 2 2512421, +386 31 303806
info@storklja.si
Phosphate-free Detergents
Society "Krnica"
Underground Water and Farmers
Veliki Nerajec 18a, 8343 Dragatus, tel Lidija Ivansek,
10,000
Workshops + field activities on
+386 7 3057428, +386 40 726041, fax lidija.ivansek@ric-
HR border
+386 7 3056531
belakrajina.si

80

PROJECT
UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project
COMPONENT
LIST OF DRP NATIONAL GRANTS SELECTED (ROUND II)
ORGANIZATION
PROJECT TITLE
CONTACT INFO
PROJECT LEADER
Budget /
Comment
ICRO, Institute for Integral
Individual Waste Water Cleaning
Koroska cesta 57, 2000 Maribor, tel
Ana Vovk Korze,
10,000
Development and Environment
Systems for Households and Farms +386 51 348695
ana.vovk@uni-mb.si
in the Areas of Dispersed
Settlements
Romania

Association for Sustainable
Preventing and Reducing Nutrient
str. Aleea Independentei 1, birou 59,
Vasile Meda,
13,230
Development Slatina
Pollution from Agro-Zoo
Slatina, jud. Olt, tel/fax +40 249
office@adds.ro
Technical Sources in the Olt River 416345
Basin public particip.
Ecological Club UNESCO Pro
Cooperation to Reduce Nutrient
Calea Plevnei 61, Bucuresti, tel/fax
Emilian Burdusel,
9,600
Natura
Pollution from Agricultural Sources in +40 21 3112644
pronatura@ccs.ro
Ilfov County
BAP + wetlands
Alma-Ro Association
Clean Land, Rich Man!
Calea Plevnei 46-48, Corp C, et. 1,
Eliza Teodorescu, alma-
9,700
BAP in Calarasi county
camera C, 010233 Bucuresti, tel/fax
ro@b.astral.ro
+40 21 3143960
GREEN VALLEY Association
Action Plan to Reduce Nutrient and
str. Sugau 75, 435500 Sighetu
Ildiko Ibolya Beres,
8,500
Pesticide Pollution in Maramures
Marmatiei, jud. Maramures, tel +40
valeaverde_mm@yahoo.c
BAP & wetland restoration
262 330602, fax +40 262 319088
om
Association for Ecology and
Clean Waters, Without Nutrients,
str. Pacurari 85, 700515 Iasi, tel +40
Aurora Matei,
9,000
Sustainable Development Iasi
Through Natural Fertilisers
232 260410, fax +40 232 257012
palexim@mail.dntis.ro
Private & animal waste disposal

DRP NGO Small Grants Programme Assessment of NGO Projects 2006
81