November, 2006
FINAL REPORT FOR
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGION PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT OF
M2 METHODOLOGY / CHECKLIST
AUTHOR
PREPARED BY:
Federal Environment Agency Ltd., Austria
(Umweltbundesamt)
AUTHOR:
Hermine Weber
Federal Environment Agency Ltd., Austria,
Umweltbundesamt GmbH Spittelauer
Lände 5
A 1090 Vienna
PREFACE
The Federal Environment Agency ltd., Austria was instructed to perform services "Development
of M2 methodology / checklist" (Project No. RER/03/G31/A/1G/31) as specified in the small
contract for services by UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project of 31 March 2005.
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Description of Required Services ......................................................................... 13
2
Inception Report/Progress Reports ...................................................................... 15
3
M1 methodology ............................................................................................... 17
3.1
Problem to be solved ..................................................................................... 17
3.2
Goals........................................................................................................... 17
3.3
Description of the methodology ....................................................................... 17
3.4
Conclusions:................................................................................................. 20
4
Task 1: Development of M2 methodology ............................................................. 21
4.1
Factors for M2 methodology............................................................................ 21
4.2
Classification system for M2 methodology ......................................................... 22
5
Task 2: Revised ranking of contaminated sites using M2 methodology ...................... 23
5.1
Existing data set ........................................................................................... 23
5.2
Output of the data set.................................................................................... 24
5.2.1
Contaminated deposit sites: ........................................................................ 26
5.2.2
Output of the data set regarding the considered countries: .............................. 30
5.2.3
Contaminated industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites: ............................. 31
5.3
Summary:.................................................................................................... 33
5.3.1
Deposit sites:............................................................................................ 33
5.3.2
Industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites: ................................................. 34
5.4
Solution/recommendations to the ICPDR: ......................................................... 34
6
Task 3: Revised checklist for site investigation ...................................................... 35
6.1
Checklist for the investigation and risk assessment of contaminated sites in flood risk
areas .......................................................................................................... 35
6.2
Recommendations ......................................................................................... 38
7
Meetings.......................................................................................................... 41
7.1
31st APC-EG meeting in Bratislava (7th and 8th April 2005) ................................... 41
7.2
Meeting in Vienna (29th July 2005)................................................................... 41
7.3
32nd APC-EG meeting in Berlin (23rd, 24th September 2005)................................. 41
7.4
Workshop on M2 methodology and refineries pilot project (17. July 2006 and 1st AP
Task Group Meeting in Constanta, Rumania (20.-21. July 2006) .......................... 42
8
Recommended Solutions .................................................................................... 47
9
Literature ........................................................................................................ 49
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 6
LIST OF APPENDIX AND ANNEXES
Appendix 1
Working list of reported contaminated sites (data set)
Table (a):
All reported deposit and industrial/abandoned sites (97 records)
Table (b):
All reported deposit and industrial/abandoned sites (97 records)
(coloured)
Table (c):
Reported deposit sites, Slovakia (18 records)
Table (d):
Reported deposit sites, Hungary (32 records)
Table (e):
Reported deposit sites, Romania (25 records)
Table (f):
Reported deposit and industrial sites, Austria (5 deposit sites, 11
industrial sites)
Table (g):
Reported deposit sites, Germany (2 records)
Table (h):
Reported deposit sites, Ukraine (3 records)
Table (i):
Reported deposit sites, Czech Republic (1 record)
Table (j):
Reported deposit sites (Igor Liska, Version 13.06.2005) (98 records)
Appendix 2:
Checklist for the Investigation and Risk Assessment of Contaminated
Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1:
Questionnaire of Contaminates Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 2:
Branch Catalogue of Germany
Annex 3:
European Waste Catalogue
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
FINAL REPORT, M2 METHODOLOGY - TITLE
page 7
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 and Table 2 Excerpt from the European Waste Catalogue and from the Branch
Catalogue of Germany ...................................................................................19
Table 3
Factors for "flooding potential" (FP) .................................................................21
Table 4
Factors for "safety measures" (SM) .................................................................21
Table 5
Classification system priority classes .............................................................22
Table 6
Results of the M1 methodology for deposit sites ................................................26
Table 7
Overview of reported information regarding "flooding potential" and "safety
measures" and output of M2 methodology for deposit sites .................................28
Table 8
Determined contaminated deposit sites with an M2-value 50............................29
Table 9
Overview of reported information regarding "flooding potential" and "safety
measures" and output of M2 methodology for industrial sites ..............................32
Table 10 Determined contaminated industrial sites with an M2-value 50.........................33
Table 11 Evaluation table for deposit sites.....................................................................44
LIST OF PICTURES AND GRAPHS
Figure 1 and Figure 2 Evaluation tables with extended size classes ...................................20
Figure 3 Total reported contaminated sites ...................................................................25
Figure 4 Reported deposit sites and industrial sites ........................................................26
Figure 5 (a, b, c, d) Contribution of the relevant contaminated deposit sites (M1 methodology)
..................................................................................................27
Figure 6 (a, b, c, d) Contribution of the relevant contaminated deposit sites (M2 methodology)
..................................................................................................31
Figure 7 Contribution of the relevant contaminated deposit sites (M2 methodology)............33
Figure 8 Flowchart of the assessment of contaminated sites in flood risk areas...................37
Picture 1 Map from Rompetrol, Navodari, Rumania, 20th July 2006 ....................................42
Picture 2 Participants of the workshop at Rompetrol (in front of the main-entrance of
Rompetrol), 20th July 2006.............................................................................43
Picture 3 Contaminated deposit site (oil sludge pond), 20th July 2006 ................................43
Picture 4 Participants of the "workshop on M2 mehtodology" at Rompetrol, 20th July 2006...45
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 8
ABBREVIATIONS
DRB
Danube River Basin
DRP
Danube Regional Project
EG Expert
Group
EU European
Union
ICPDR
International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River
UNDP
United Nations Development Programme
CS Contaminated
Sites
WGI
Working Group Inventory
APC EG
Accident Prevent and Control Expert Group
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT
The aim of this project was to develop methodologies for assessment and ranking of the risks
from contaminated sites in potential flood risk areas within the Danube River Basin and to
develop Checklists for site inspections of high risk contaminated sites.
The "M2 methodology" will be an enhancement of an approach already developed within the
region known as "M1 methodology".
In a further step the ranking of contaminated sites in the Danube River Basin by using the
existing data sets prepared under the M1 assessment of contaminated sites (about 100
contaminated sites in flood risk areas are listed within the Danube River Basin) needs to be
revised, in accordance with the safety measures and the risk of flooding at the site.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Danube Regional Project (DRP) has been established to contribute to the sustainable human
development in the Danube River Basin (DRB) through reinforcing the capacities in the basin to
develop effective co-operation in order to ensure the protection of the Danube River. The
objective of the DRP is to complete the activities of the International Commission for the
Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR), to provide a regional approach to the development of
national policies, legislation and the definition of actions for nutrient reduction and pollution
control in the DRB.
The tasks of the ICPDR are mandated by the "Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and
Sustainable Use of the Danube River" (Danube River Protection Convention, DRPC). From this
Convention also derive the responsibilities of the ICPDR directed towards ensuring its
implementation and to enhancing the cooperation of the Contracting Parties fulfilling their
respective obligations.
The ICPDR and its Expert Group on Accident Prevention and Control (APC EG) have established
a methodology (referred to as M1 methodology) for the pre-assessment of contaminated sites in
flood risk areas. The DRP working with the APC EG, has supported the development of a
checklist assessment of at-risk contaminated sites. A more detailed assessment and ranking of
the potential risks of contaminated sites in flood risk areas was required, necessitating the
development of a more precise ranking system and revised checklist for the assessment of the
higher risk contaminated sites.
The APC EG and its Working Group on Inventories (WGI) have developed and applied an initial
screening of contaminated sites using the M1 methodology. This has been a desk-based
assessment based of:
·
Identification of contaminated sites above a specified size (including landfills, industrial,
military sites etc.) in potential flood areas;
·
A pre-assessment using evaluation tables agreed by the APC EG;
·
Development of factors based on the size of the contaminated site and waste type;
·
A risk value, which dictated if further investigation was required.
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 10
The M2 methodology will use the M1 evaluations as an initial starting point for the revised
assessment. This assessment and ranking will be refined by the inclusion of a "flooding potential
factor" (FP) and an evaluation of "safety measures" (SM) available at the site (see chapter 4,
Task 1: Development of M2 methodology).
It was expected that the operational use of the M2 methodology assessment will involve a site
inspection. To facilitate the site inspection, a checklist was further elaborated in this assignment
(see chapter 7.4 and Appendix 2).
This assignment is an activity (referred to as Accident Emergency Response DRP Output 2.3)
within the DRP overall programme under its objective 2 Capacity Building and Transboundary
Co-operation.
Outputs of the Phase 1 of the DRP are available from the DRP´s web site www.undp-drp.org
and the activities of the APC EG (and the WGE) are available from the ICPDR´s web site
www.icpdr.org.
SUMMARY
Development of M2 methodology
One aim of this project was to develop the M2 methodology for assessment and ranking of the
risks from contaminated sites in flood risk areas within the Danube River Basin.
The M2 methodology will use the M1 evaluation as an initial starting point and a further
enhancement by the factor FP (flooding potential) (see Table 3) and the factor SM (set safety
measures at the site) (see Table 4). The M2-value can be calculated by the formula
M2 = M1 * FP * SM
The M2-value can be classified into 4 priority classes (see Table 5). For each priority class 1, 2,
3 and 4 the necessity for the need for further measures to be established at the contaminated
site to improve the safety of contaminated site in flood risk areas and to reduce the risk of
contamination related on waters is proposed. This was discussed and agreed by the members of
the APC-EG in July 2006 in Constanta (Rumania).
Revised data-sets (working list)
A further task of this contract was to revise the existing data set (working list) prepared under
the M1 assessment of contaminated sites and to refine the ranking of these sites in accordance
with the safety measures (SM) and the risk of flooding (FP) (M2 methodology).
13 countries of the Danube River Basin (Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Germany,
Ukraine, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Bosnia&Herzegovina, Croatia, Moldova, Bulgaria and Serbia)
were ask to report their contaminated sites (deposit sites and industrial and/or abandoned
industrial sites) to the APC-EG. 7 countries (Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Germany,
Ukraine and Czech Republic) reported in total 97 contaminated sites (86 deposit sites, 11
industrial sites and/or abandoned industrial sites).
Deposit sites:
The paper "Methodology for the Pre-Assessment of Suspected Contaminated Sites in the
Danube River Basin (M1 methodology), September 2004" propose a minimum-size for deposit
sites to be investigated from about 100.000 m³. The consultant however recommends for
deposit sites a minimum-volume of about 10.000 m³. This was agreed with the UNDP and
ICPDR in October 2006
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 11
76 deposit sites (out of reported 86 deposit sites) have a volume higher or equal 10.000 m³ (10
sites are smaller 10.000 m³) (see Table 6).
After applying the M1 methodology (by using the evaluation tables) 43 deposit sites show an
M1-value higher or equal 47 that mean, that further investigations (by taking into account
the flooding potential (FP) and the safety measures (SM)) are necessary. For one site no
information about the type of waste was reported, therefore no evaluation of the M1-value could
be made. The remaining 42 of the investigated deposit sites (out of 86 deposit sites) show an
M1-value smaller than 47 this sites can be sorted out and are no longer relevant (unless the
suspicion is not totally excluded) for the M2 methodology.
43 contaminated sites show an M1-value 47, but for only 23 sites sufficient information about
the "flooding potential" and "safety measures" is given. After the run of the M2 methodology 12
contaminated deposit sites (out of 23) show an M2-value higher or equal 47. For those
contaminated sites further "short-, middle- and long-term-measures" are necessary.
For approximately 50 % (12 contaminated deposit site out of 23 contaminated deposit sites
with all relevant information) of the reported contaminated deposit sites "short-, middle- and
long-term-measures" are recommended.
Industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites:
Regarding contaminated industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites the information is poor.
Only Austria reported sufficient information (11 contaminated industrial and/or abandoned
industrial sites) about the present situation of contaminated industrial sites in their countries.
Germany reported no relevant industrial and/or abandoned industrial site within the Danube
River Basin.
All reported 11 contaminated industrial sites from Austria deliver an M1-value higher 50. After
applying the M2 methodology (by taking into account the "flooding potential" and "safety
measures") 3 contaminated industrial sites show an M2-value higher 50. For those 3 sites
"short-, middle- and long-term-measures" are necessary.
For approximately 27 % (3 contaminated industrial site out of 11 contaminated industrial sites)
of the reported contaminated industrial sites "short-, middle- and long-term-measures" are
necessary.
Solution/recommendations to the ICPDR:
Because of the lack of reported contaminated sites within the Danube River Basin, the
Umweltbundesamt Vienna will recommend to the ICPDR for future activities following steps
(request from the APC-EG, 32nd APC-EG-meeting):
·
statistical extrapolation of the estimated number of contaminated sites in flood risk
areas (basis data from Austria) to get an idea how many contaminated sites (deposit
sites and industrial sites) can be expected within the Danube River Basin
·
support for the Danube-countries in collecting contaminated sites (deposit sites and
industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites)
·
providing of financial funds for the Danube Countries to built up a national collecting
system of contaminated sites for selected countries
·
support with technical experts if necessary
·
continue of collecting contaminated sites in flood risk areas within the Danube River
Basin
·
set prevention measures and remediation activities (for contaminated sites with an M2-
value 50).
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 12
Checklist:
The third main-task was to rework the 4th draft of the "Checklist for the Investigation and Risk
Assessment of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas" (delivered by the International
Commission of the protection of the Danube River, APC-EG).
The reworked checklist will serve as a hand guide for a desk-study and for a first visit of sites,
suspected to be contaminated by substances hazardous to water.
The incorporated M1 and M2 methodology will allow the competent authorities to classify the
contaminated sites in flood risk areas into the 4 priority classes. The checklist includes also
general information for proposed safety measures (short, middle and long term measures) and
recommendations which will allow the authorities to reduce the risk at a contaminated site in
flood risk areas and to increase public safety and to protect the environment in the Danube
River Basin.
The purpose of a fist desk-study and site visit is to find out:
where highly contaminated zones are suspected and located within flood risk areas
whether immediate action is needed
The checklist covers contaminated sites as follows:
deposit sites (minimum volume: 10.000 m³) (e.g. old, unsorted landfills, waste
deposals),
industrial sites and/or abandoned industrial sites (minimum area: 5.000 m²) (e.g.
closed down industrial sites, mining sites, sewage sludge/water treatment, or other
sources of contamination (past incidents, leakages, operational losses))
Contaminated sites with radioactive substances are excluded.
The reworked checklist "Checklist for the Investigation and Risk Assessment of Contaminated
Sites in Flood Risk Areas" was tested in July 2006 in Constanta Rumania at a contaminated site
(Rompetrol in Navodari, Constanta, Rumania (see Appendix 1, Table 1, item 97)).
The checklist was discussed and agreed by the members of the seminar "workshop on M2
methodology and refineries pilot project"(20th, 21st July 2006). Comments on the tested
checklist were incorporated into the checklist by the author.
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 13
1
DESCRIPTION OF REQUIRED SERVICES
The consultant was expected to participate in a site visit by the WGI to test the Checklist and to
incorporate any necessary changes. Further more, to attend up to two APC EG meetings
(location of the meetings within the Danube River Basin).
Additionally the Consultant was expected to undertake the following tasks:
·
Develop a methodology and classification system for the ranking of contaminated sites
in flood risk areas and to propose an approach for using this methodology (M2
methodology). This should be discussed and agreed in a meeting of the WGI (Working
Group of Inventories).
·
Using the existing data sets prepared under the M1 assessment of contaminated sites,
to refine the ranking of these sites in accordance with the safety measures at the site
and the risk of flooding. This will result in the identification of the highest priority sites
needing action.
·
Develop checklist for site inspections of high risk contaminated sites
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 15
2
INCEPTION REPORT/PROGRESS REPORTS
The Consultant was expected to start with an Inception Report and to provide brief reports every 2 months,
indicating work completed and on-going, any problems and solutions recommended.
The Contractor calculated five Progress Reports for this project. Within this duration time (March 2005 until
May 2006) 7 Progress Reports were carried out.
·
Inception Report, April 2005
·
1st Progress Report, May 2005
·
2nd Progress Report, July 2005
·
3rd Progress Report, September 2005
·
4th Progress Report, November 2005
·
5th Progress Report, January 2006
·
6th Progress Report, March 2006
·
7th Progress Report, May 2006
The Inception Report and all Progress Reports you will find at the CD (delivered with the Final Report,
November 2006).
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 17
3
M1 METHODOLOGY
Excerpt from "Methodology for the Pre-Assessment of Suspected Contaminated Sites in the
Danube River Basin (M1 methodology)", September 2004:
Contaminated sites generated by former industrial activities pose a potential danger for the
environment. This refers in particular to contaminated sites containing hazardous substances,
which could lead to a significant contamination of water bodies, in case the substances are
mobilized (e.g. by flood). During recent years dramatic floods on the Elbe, the Danube and the
Oder have shown that the toxic impact of those contaminated sites could cause a significant
threat to water bodies in Europe. For that reason the ICPDR decided to draw up a basin wide
inventory of contaminated sites (CS) in flood risk areas in the Danube River Basin.
3.1 Problem to be solved
For the Danube River Basin recommendations are necessary, which would enable the competent
authorities of the riparian countries to perform the following activities:
·
Establishment of a methodology for a preliminary risk assessment of the CS reported in
the inventory of the Danube countries
·
Drawing up the recommendations for respective safety measures which could serve as
regulatory guidelines.
·
Drafting a Measure Catalogue as a handbook for the implementation of these safety
guidelines.
3.2 Goals
The major goal was to develop in a first step a methodology for an initial risk assessment of
contaminated sites in flood risk areas, based on the data from the inventory of contaminated
sites in the Danube River Basin. However, in principle, the M1 methodology is applicable to the
pre-assessment of any contaminated sites. The reported sites where a high risk potential is
assumed should be screened by a preliminary assessment. This methodology will serve as a
guide for the elaboration of safety recommendations and a concrete measure catalogue in the
next steps.
In the next step the detailed analysis of the priority hot spots will lead to the elaboration of
safety recommendations for contaminated sites. Together with a detailed measure catalogue
these recommendations will serve for a checklist which will allow the competent authorities to
improve the safety of the contaminated sites and to reduce the risk of contamination of surface
waters.
3.3 Description of the methodology
The methodology allows the initial risk assessment of contaminated sites by applying the
following parameters:
·
The toxic potential of soil or waste (it depends on the harmful substances to be
expected in a type of waste or in a specific industrial branch and it is expressed as a risk
value).
·
The volume of an old deposit or the area of an old industrial site.
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 18
For each waste type of the EUROPEAN WASTE CATALOGUE (examples given in Table 1) and for
each branch of the BRANCH CATALOGUE OF GERMANY (examples given in Table 1) a risk-value
r0 was proposed in classes from 1 to 5. This risk factor r0 is derived by experience gained in
several German Federal States (e.g. Saxony) and it takes into account the toxic potential of soil
or waste that can be expected from a branch or waste specific contamination.
For a concrete waste type or industrial branch a range of risk is given (e.g. r0 from 3-5). The
first figure corresponds to the lowest class of risk to be expected, the higher figure indicates the
highest class of risk to be expected ("worst case scenario"). This opens up the possibility for an
expert judgement to adjust the r0 value if further information about the site is available (e.g. if
the contaminants are known). In this case the liability of the assessment is improved. In the
other cases, the average risk value is calculated and rounded up. The risk values r0 should be
between 1 and 5.
The risk values are linked with the site magnitude (specified in case of old deposits as volume
[m³] or in case of old industrial sites as surface area classes [m²]) to an "initial risk factor" m1,
which gives an information about the potential risk of each site (see example in Figure 1).
For example:
A site with a contaminated volume of 200.000 m³ with a risk value of 5 receives an M1-value of
55.
A site with a contaminated area of 15.000 m2 with a risk value of 4 receives an M1-value of 51.
To select the sites with a high priority the assessment was concentrated only at those sites,
which are potentially impacted by floods. Additionally only those sites should be investigated,
which include more than 100.000 m³ of contaminated volume or cover an area larger than
5.000 m².
The consultant however recommends all sites which include more than 10.000 m³ of
contaminated volume (deposit sites, landfills) to be investigated. The evaluation table for
contaminated volume lager or equal 10.000 m³ shows M1-values higher 50 (see Figure 1),
which are relevant for the next investigation (M2 methodology).
This matter was discussed agreed by UNDP (Mr. P. Whalley) and ICPDR (Mrs. M. Popovici) in
October 2006.
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 19
Table 1 and Table 2 Excerpt from the European Waste Catalogue and from the Branch
Catalogue of Germany
Table 1:
List of wastes pursuant to Article 1 (a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC on waste (EUROPEAN
WASTE CATALOGUE).
e.g.
The r0 values "5" and "6" are both considered as being "5".
Table 2:
Branch related hazard classifying of Industries (BRANCH CATALOGUE OF GERMANY)
e.g.
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 20
Figure 1 and Figure 2
Evaluation tables with extended size classes
3.4 Conclusions:
The presented evaluation tables serve for the pre-assessment of the contaminated sites (waste
deposits and abandoned industrial sites). The tables should be looked upon as a first screening
of those sites, which have to be preferably visited and further investigated. A finer ranking is
not possible at this investigation stage, because the inaccuracy of the data is very high. All sites
with an initial risk value equal or higher 50 should be inspected to perform a risk assessment by
using the checklists. For a better differentiation of the m1-ranked sites the criterion of flood
probability should be applied (M2 methodology).
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 21
4
TASK 1: DEVELOPMENT OF M2 METHODOLOGY
The consultant was expected to develop a methodology and classification system for the ranking
of contaminated sites subject to flood risks and to propose an approach for using the
methodology.
To refine the ranking of the sites prepared under the m1 assessment of contaminated sites an
enhanced methodology (i.e. M2 methodology) has to be developed taking into account the
safety measures (SM) at the site and the risk of flooding (FP).
In Table 3 and Table 4 the factors for "safety measures" and "flooding potential" are listed.
These factors have been agreed upon by the participants of the Accident Prevention and Control
Expert Group (APC EG).
4.1 Factors for M2 methodology
In the following tables the relevant factors for the M2 methodology is given.
Table 3
Factors for "flooding potential" (FP)
Flooding potential
Flood-frequency (years)
Factor of flooding potential (FP)
Low >
100
0
Medium
100
1
High
< 30
3
Very high
< 10
10
Table 4
Factors for "safety measures" (SM)
Level of set safety measures
Description
Factor for safety measures (SM)
(MS) is/are
Low
No safety measures are set
3
Medium
Safety measures are set partly
2
High
Necessary safety measures are set
1
For the "flooding potential" (FP) a score from 0 to 10 (e.g. water flooding occurs once in 10
years factor FP = 10), and for the "safety measures" (SM) a score from 1 to 3 (e.g. all
required safety measures are implemented on a specific site factor SM = 1) has been set.
For example:
The factor of safety measures is 1 when the level of set safety measures and/or preventive
measures to lower the risk at the site is high.
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 22
The factor of safety measures is 3 when the level of set safety measures and/or preventive
measures to lower the risk at the site is low.
To receive the M2-values for m2 assessment the formula is as follows:
M2 = M1 x FP x SM
FP ... factor flooding potential; SM ... factor safety measures;
M1 ... M1-value from evaluation tables taking into account the volume/area and risk potential
from a specific contaminated deposit/industrial- and/or abandoned site.
4.2 Classification system for M2 methodology
In a further step the contaminated sites will be classified into priority classes (by considering
the determined M2-value). For all contaminated sites within the priority classes 1, 2 or 3
preventive and/or remediation measures have to be set at the sites to improve the safety of the
contaminated site and to reduce the risk of contamination related on waters (see Table 5).
This proposal was discussed and agreed by the members of the APC-EG in July 2006 in
Constanta.
Table 5
Classification system priority classes
Priority class for
Need for further measures to be established at
M2-values
remediation
the site
1
1000 1.800
Very high
2
250 - <1000
High
3
50 - <250
Relevant
4 <50
Low
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 23
5 TASK 2: REVISED RANKING OF CONTAMINATED
SITES USING M2 METHODOLOGY
5.1 Existing
data
set
A further main task of this contract was to revise the existing data set (working list) prepared
under the M1 assessment of contaminated sites and to refine the ranking of these sites in
accordance with the safety measures (SM) and the risk of flooding (FP) (M2 methodology).
The consultant (Hermine Weber) received several documents (existing data set, working-list)
(listed below) from Mr. Igor Liska (ICPDR) (13th June 2005):
·
The existing data set with the reported data (Version 6th April 2004)
·
Correspondence from the countries regarding the information of the data set
The countries of the Danube River Basin were ask to report old contaminated sites in flood risk
areas within the Danube River basin, i.e. old deposit sites and old industrial and/or abandoned
industrial sites (also military sites). Sites contaminated with radio active substances were
excluded.
The version of the data set from 6th April 2004 contains 98 recorded contaminated sites
reported from 7 countries (Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Germany, Austria, Ukraine and Czech
Republic). From Slovenia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Moldova, Bulgaria and Serbia no
contaminated sites were recorded.
The consultant tried to receive more information about contaminated sites (especially industrial
sites) from the riparian countries, because the lack of information was remarkable.
On 2nd August 2005 the consultant sent a mail to the members of the APC-EG with the request
to check the 98 reported contaminated sites and to give if necessary more information on
the factors "flooding potential" and "safety measures" (see mail below).
Dear members of the APC EG,
Regarding the OCS (old contaminated sites) within the Danube catchment area the
"Umweltbundesamt Vienna" revised the existing data sets (prepared under M1 assessment)
taking into account the factors for "flooding potential" and "safety measures".
I would like to ask you all to check your reported sites for any changes or faults and to respond
your comments until the latest until middle of September 16th Sept. 2005.
Please find enclosed the refined data sets (excel-file) and a brief summary (given below).
Thank you for your cooperation,
Best regards
Hermine Weber
Only a few countries reported more information about the situation regarding contaminated
sites in their countries:
15.09.2005: Hungary: no further comments
19.09.2005: Slovakia: after a revaluation of the contaminated sites in Slovakia two sites
could be taken out of the working list: (1) (Skadka odpadov OFZ Siroke -
Bezmenný creek) and (2), Teplaren, Povazska Bystrica - Ziar (in tube)) (see
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 24
Appendix 1, Table (j): Reported deposit sites (Igor Liska, Version: 13.06.2005),
Nr. 19 and Nr. 51).
21.9.2005:
Germany: 2 comments: (1) there are no industrial sites relevant for Germany
and (2) r0-Value for Deponie Peterswöhrd is 3.5 instead of 5 (see Appendix 1,
Table (j): Reported deposit sites (Igor Liska, Version: 13.06.2005), Nr. 10).
According the minutes of the 32nd APC-EG-meeting in Berlin, the countries reported problems of
collecting data of contaminated sites in flood risk areas within the Danube River Basin.
The major reason is because of the missing legislative basis and financial support.
Other reasons might be:
·
No or insufficient collection system of contaminated sites
·
Lack of financial funds
·
Lack of technical experts
After a site visit in Constanta Rumania (20th July 2006) to test the proposed "Checklist for the
Investigation and Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas" the consultant
extended the working list (data sets) with one more contaminated deposit site "Rompetrol in
Navodari, Constanta, Romania, oil sludge pond, industrial deposit" (see Appendix 1, Table (a),
item 97).
5.2 Output of the data set
The revised data set (July 2006) (working list) contains 97 contaminated sites (see Figure 3 and
Appendix 1, Table (a)):
Slovakia:
18 contaminated sites
Hungary: 32
"
Romania: 25
"
Austria: 16
"
Germany:
2 "
Ukraine:
3 "
Czech Republic:
1 contaminated site
Total:
97
contaminated
sites
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 25
Figure 3
Total reported contaminated sites
total reported contaminated sites
35
32
30
25
25
18
20
16
n 15
10
5
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
y
ia
a
blic
ia
ia
ia
vakia
any
wina
man
stria
raine
oat
oldov
Slo
Hungar
Serbia
Ro
Au
Cr
Germ
Uk
Repu
Sloven zego
M
Bulgar
ech
Cz
Bosnia&Her
country
Seven countries (Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Germany, Austria, Ukraine and Czech Republic)
reported deposit sites in flood risk areas. But only 4 countries (Hungary, Romania, Austria and
Germany) reported additional information about the flooding situation and the safety measures
set at a contaminated site (see Table 7).
Reported deposit sites and industrial sites (see Figure 4 and Appendix 1, Table (b)):
Slovakia:
deposit sites: 18;
industrial sites: no
information
Hungary:
deposit sites: 32;
industrial sites:
no information
Romania:
deposit sites: 25;
industrial sites: no
information
Austria:
deposit sites: 5;
industrial sites: 11
Germany:
deposit sites: 2;
industrial sites:
0 (no relevant ind. Sites)
Ukraine:
deposit sites: 3;
industrial sites:
no information
Czech Rep.:
deposit sites: 1;
industrial sites:
no information
all other countries: dep.sites and industrial sites: no information
Total:
deposit sites: 86;
industrial sites:
11;
97
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 26
Figure 4
Reported deposit sites and industrial sites
reported deposit sites and industrial sites
32
35
30
25
25
18
20
dep.sites
n
15
11
ind.sites
10
5
2
3
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
ia
ry
ia
e
ia
tia
ia
an
any
in
wina
oa
ldova
rbia
Slovak Hunga
epublic
Se
Rom
Austria
Cr
Germ
Ukra
Sloven rzego
Mo
Bulgar
ech R
Cz
Bosnia&He
country
5.2.1 Contaminated deposit sites:
For one site in Romania (item 1: Tulcea, Turcoaia, sterile pond) no information about the type
of waste is given, therefore no evaluation of the M1-value could be made.
After the first evaluation of the M1-value (M1 methodology) by using the evaluation tables (see
Figure 1 and Figure 1) the out-put can be sown as follows:
Table 6
Results of the M1 methodology for deposit sites
dep.sites dep.sites dep.sites
CS in
deposit
M1 M1 M1 <
country
10.000 < 10.000
total
sites
100.000
50
47
47
m³
m³
m³
Slovakia 18 18 15 18 0 4
14
4
Hungary 32 32 27 31 1 6
10
22
Romania 25 25 16 17 8 8
12
12
Austria 16 5 5 5
0 3 3 2
Germany 2 2 2 2
0 0 1 1
Ukraine 3 3 1 3
0 2 2 1
Czech Republic
1
1 0 0
1 0 1 0
no
no
no
no
Slovenia
no data
no data
no data
no data
data
data
data
data
Bosnia&
no
no
no
no
no data
no data
no data
no data
Herzegovina
data
data
data
data
no
no
no
no
Croatia
no data
no data
no data
no data
data
data
data
data
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 27
dep.sites dep.sites dep.sites
CS in
deposit
M1 M1 M1 <
country
10.000 < 10.000
total
sites
100.000
50
47
47
m³
m³
m³
no
no
no
no
Moldova
no data
no data
no data
no data
data
data
data
data
no
no
no
no
Bulgaria
no data
no data
no data
no data
data
data
data
data
no
no
no
no
Serbia
no data
no data
no data
no data
data
data
data
data
Total
97
86
66
76
10
23
43
42
The cut-off value for the calculation of the M2-value is M150.
By using a buffer-zone the following determination of the M2-value considers all contaminated
deposit sites with an M1-value higher or equal 47 (M147).
In Figure 5 (a, b, c, d) the relevant contaminated deposit sites (according the M1 methodology)
for the countries Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Austria are shown.
Figure 5 (a, b, c, d) Contribution of the relevant contaminated deposit sites (M1
methodology)
Slovakia: relevant for M1 methodology (dep.sites)
Hungary: relevant for M1 methodology (dep.sites)
4; 22%
10; 31%
M1 47
M1 47
M1 < 47
M1 < 47
22; 69%
14; 78%
(a)
(b)
Romania: relevant for M1 methodology (dep.sites)
Austria: relevant for M1 methodology (dep.sites)
2; 40%
M1 47
M1 47
12; 50%
12; 50%
M1 < 47
M1 < 47
3; 60%
(c)
(d)
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 28
The next table (see Table 7) gives information about "flooding potential" and "safety measures"
and the about the output of the M2 methodology.
Table 7
Overview of reported information regarding "flooding potential" and
"safety measures" and output of M2 methodology for deposit sites
CS in deposit M1
M1 < FP
SM
country
M2 50
M2 < 50
total sites
47
47
available available
no data
no data for
Slovakia 18
18 14 4 yes no data
for SM
SM
Hungary 32
32 10 22 yes yes 2
8
Romania 25
25 1) 12
12 yes
partly 9
2) -
Austria 16
5 3 2 yes yes 0
3
Germany 2
2 1 1 yes yes 1
0
no data
no data for
Ukraine 3
3 2 1 no data no data
for FP,SM FP,SM
no data
no data for
Czech Republic
1
1 1 0 no data no data
for FP,SM FP,SM
no
no
no
Slovenia
no data
no data no data
no data
no data
data data
data
no
no
no
Bosnia&Herzegovina
no data
no data no data
no data
no data
data data
data
no
no
no
Croatia
no data
no data no data
no data
no data
data data
data
no
no
no
Moldova
no data
no data no data
no data
no data
data data
data
no
no
no
Bulgaria
no data
no data no data
no data
no data
data data
data
no
no
no
Serbia
no data
no data no data
no data
no data
data data
data
Total
97
86
43
42
-
-
12
11
FP ... flooding potential; SM ... safety measures
1) ... including one site in Romania (Tulcea, Turcoaia, (see Appendix 1, Table (b), item: 1): no
waste-information given
2) ... for 3 deposit sites no data for SM
For 43 contaminated sites (out of 86 reported contaminated deposit sites) an M1-value 47
could be determined, but only for 23 deposit sites (Hungary 10, Romania 9, Austria 3 and
Germany 1) with an M1-value 47 a further investigation (by applying the M2 methodology)
could be made. For the remaining 20 contaminated sites with an M1-value 47 (Slovakia 14,
Romania 3, Ukraine 2 and Czech Republic 1) insufficient information about the "flooding
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 29
potential" (FP) and/or the "safety measures" (SM) is given. From the countries Slovenia, Bosnia
& Herzegovina, Croatia, Moldova, Bulgaria and Serbia no data for contaminated sites and/or
information about "flooding potential" and "safety measures" are reported.
After applying the M2 methodology 12 contaminated deposit sites show an M2-value higher or
equal 50 that means, that for those sites further "short, middle and long-term measures" are
necessary.
Table 8 represents the relevant contaminated deposit sites after applying the M2 methodology
and their classification in priority classes (see Appendix 1, Table (b)).
Table 8
Determined contaminated deposit sites with an M2-value 50
Item-
M2-
Priority
n
Country
Name
Nr.
value
class
Sibiu, Copsa Mica, slags from primary and
1 13 Romania
114
3
secondary melting
Hunedoara, Calan, not processed slag, lining
and refractory waste materials, furnace slag,
2 14 Romania foundry shapes containing organic ligands,
171 3
wastes from mixture preparation previously
thermic processing, other tars
3
15
Romania
See 14 (double?)
171
3
4
26
Romania
Bacau, Letea Veche, Fuel burning
318
2
Middle Tisa, Environmental Inspectorales Area,
5 31 Hungary Szolnok, Beghin-Say Cukorgyar Inc., waste
50 3
water sludge in lake
Teleorman, Tumu Magurele, Pyrite ash pond,
6 32 Romania
100 3
not specified (wastes containing metals)
Sibiu, Copsa Mica, Tarnave Mare River, Visa
7 33 Romania brook, industrial waste, slags from primary and 100 3
secondary melting
Dolj, Calafat, slag and ash pond from coal
8 37 Romania
98 3
burning
Dillingen, Hühnerwörth, old deposit, municipal
9 46 Germany
141 3
waste
Dolj, Calafat, industrial waste, wastes from
10 50
Romania
141 3
sugar beet processing
Middle Danube Environmental Inspectorates
area, Budapest, Csepel-island Nord, abandon
11 52
Hungary
141 3
sewage, sludge depots, heavy metal and
hydrocarbon polluted organic compounds
Rompetrol in Navodari, Constanta. Oil sludge
12 97
Romania
330 2
pund
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 30
5.2.2 Output of the data set regarding the considered countries:
Hungary:
Hungary reported 32 deposit sites. One deposit site shows a volume smaller 10.000 m³ and is
no longer relevant for the M1 methodology. For 10 contaminated deposit sites (out of 31) an
M1-value higher or equal 47 could be determined. Sufficient information about "flooding
potential" and "safety measures" is given. After running the M2 methodology 2 sites show an
M2-value equal or higher 50. For this 2 deposit sites (see Table 8 and Figure 6 (a)) "short-,
middle- and long-term-measures are necessary.
The reported deposit sites are listed in Appendix 1, Table (d).
Romania:
Romania reported 25 deposit sites. For one site no information about the type of waste is given
(Appendix1, Table (b), Item Nr. 1). 12 contaminated deposit sites show an M1-value higher or
equal 47, but only for 9 contaminated deposit sites the M2 Methodology could be applied. For
the remaining 3 sites (Appendix 1, Table (b), Item Nr. 39, 53 and 54) less information about
the "safety measures" is given.
For all 9 contaminated deposit sites (M2 methodology) an M2-value higher or equal 50 can be
shown. That means that for all those 9 deposit sites (see Table 8 and Figure 6 (b)) "short-,
middle- and long-term-measures are necessary. The reported deposit sites are listed in
Appendix 1, Table (e).
Austria:
Austria reported 5 deposit sites. 3 (out of 5) are relevant for the M2 methodology. But no
deposit sites show an M2-value higher or equal 50 (see Table 8 and Figure 6 (c)). The reported
deposit sites are listed in Appendix 1, Table (f).
Germany:
From the two reported contaminated deposit sites in Germany only one site is relevant for the
M2 methodology. This site shows an M2-value higher 50 (see Table 8 and Figure 6 (d)), that
means "short-, middle- and long-term-measures are necessary. The reported deposit sites are
listed in Appendix 1, Table (g).
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 31
Figure 6 (a, b, c, d) Contribution of the relevant contaminated deposit sites (M2
methodology)
Hungary: contribution of m2- values
Romania: contribution of m2- values
(10 dep.sites relevant for M2)
(9 dep.sites relevant for M2)
2; 20%
0; 0%
M2 50
M2 50
M2 < 50
M2 < 50
8; 80%
9; 100%
(a)
(b)
Austria: contribution of m2- values (3
Germany: contribution of m2- values
dep.sites relevant for M2)
(1 dep.site relevant for M2)
0; 0%
0; 0%
M2 50
M2 50
M2 < 50
M2 < 50
3; 100%
1; 100%
(c)
(d)
Slovakia, Ukraine and Czech Republic reported contaminated deposit sites but insufficient or no
information about the "flooding potential" (FP) and/or "safety measures" (SM) (see Table 7).
The reported deposit sites are listed in Appendix 1, Table (c), (h) and (i).
From Slovenia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Moldova, Bulgaria and Serbia no data sets were
reported (see Table 7).
5.2.3 Contaminated industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites:
Only the countries Austria and Germany reported information about industrial and/or
abandoned industrial sites within the Danube River Basin. Austria reported 11 contaminated
industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites and Germany reported no relevant industrial sites
within flood risk areas.
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 32
Table 9
Overview of reported information regarding "flooding potential" and
"safety measures" and output of M2 methodology for industrial sites
ind.sites
CS indust.
ind.sites M1 M1 <
FP
SM
M2
M2 <
n
country
in
< 5.000
sites
5.000
47
47
available available
50
50
total
m²
m²
no
no
1 Slovakia 18
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data
data
no
no
2 Hungary 32
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data
data
no
no
3 Romania 25
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data
data
4 Austria 16 11 11 0 11 0 yes yes 3 8
5 Germany 2
0 0 0 0 0 - - 0 0
no
no
6 Ukraine 3
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data
data
no data no data
Czech
no
no
7
1
no data no data
no data no data
no data
for
for
Republic
data
data
FP,SM
FP,SM
no
no
no
8 Slovenia
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data data
data
Bosnia&
no
no
no
9 Herzego-
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data data
data
vina
no
no
no
10 Croatia
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data data
data
no
no
no
11 Moldova
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data data
data
no
no
no
12 Bulgaria
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data data
data
no
no
no
13 Serbia
no data no data
no data no data
no data
no data no data
data data
data
13 Total
97
11
11
0
11
0
0
0
3
8
For all reported 11 contaminated industrial sites (Austria 11 ind. sites 5.000 m²) the m1- and
the M2 Methodology could be applied.
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 33
After applying the m1- and the M2 methodology (by taking into account the flooding potential
(FP) and the safety measures (SM)) three industrial sites show a necessity for further "short-,
middle- and long-term-measures". These three industrial sites are shown in Table 10 and Figure
7).
Table 10
Determined contaminated industrial sites with an M2-value 50
Item-
M2-
Priority
Nr.
Country
Name
Nr.
value
class
Lower-Austria, Korneuburg Shpyard,
1 8 Austria
513 2
metals, hydrocarbon oil
Carintia, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Brückl,
2 16 Austria Trichlorethen, Tetrachlorethen,
112 3
Hexachlorbutadien
Lower-Austria, Korneuburg, Tankfarm
3 29 Austria
306 2
Mare, mineral oil depot
Figure 7
Contribution of the relevant contaminated deposit sites (M2
methodology)
Austria: contribution of m2- values
(11 reported ind.sites)
3; 27%
M2 50
8; 73%
M2 < 50
5.3 Summary:
13 countries of the Danube River Basin (Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Germany, Ukraine, Czech
Republic, Slovenia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Croatia, Moldova, Bulgaria and Serbia) were ask to report their
contaminated sites (deposit sites and industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites) to the APC-EG. 7 countries
(Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Austria, Germany, Ukraine and Czech Republic) reported in total 97
contaminated sites (86 deposit sites, 11 industrial sites and/or abandoned industrial sites).
5.3.1 Deposit sites:
The "Methodology for the Pre-Assessment of Suspected Contaminated Sites in the Danube River Basin (M1
methodology), September 2004" propose a minimum-size for deposit sites to be investigated of 100.000 m³.
The consultant however recommends for deposit sites a minimum-volume of 10.000 m³. This was discussed
and agreed with UNDP and ICPDR in October 2006.
76 deposit sites (out of reported 86 deposit sites) have a volume higher or equal 10.000 m³ (10 sites are
smaller 10.000 m³) (see Table 6).
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 34
After applying the M1 methodology (by using the evaluation tables) 43 deposit sites show an M1-value higher
or equal 47 that mean, that further investigations (by taking into account the flooding potential (FP) and the
safety measures (SM)) are necessary. For one site no information about the type of waste was reported,
therefore no evaluation of the M1-value could be made. The remaining 42 of the investigated deposit sites
show an M1-value smaller than 47 this sites can be sorted out and are no longer relevant (unless the
suspicion is not totally excluded) for the M2 methodology.
43 contaminated sites show an M1-value 47, but for only 23 sites sufficient information about the "flooding
potential" and "safety measures" is given. After the run of the M2 methodology 12 contaminated deposit sites
(out of 23) show an M2-value higher or equal 47. For those contaminated sites further "short-, middle- and
long-term-measures" are necessary.
For approximately 50 % (12 contaminated deposit site out of 23 contaminated deposit sites with all
relevant information) of the reported contaminated deposit sites "short-, middle- and long-term-
measures" are necessary.
5.3.2 Industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites:
Regarding contaminated industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites the information is very
poor. Only Austria reported sufficient information (11 contaminated industrial and/or abandoned
industrial sites) of the present situation of contaminated industrial sites in their countries.
Germany reported no relevant industrial and/or abandoned industrial site within the Danube
River Basin.
All reported 11 contaminated industrial sites from Austria deliver an M1-value higher 50. After
applying the M2 methodology (by taking into account the "flooding potential" and "safety
measures") 3 contaminated industrial sites show an M2-value higher 50. For those 3 sites
"short-, middle- and long-term-measures" are necessary.
For approximately 27 % (3 contaminated industrial site out of 11 contaminated
industrial sites) of the reported contaminated industrial sites "short-, middle- and
long-term-measures" are necessary.
5.4 Solution/recommendations to the ICPDR:
Because of the lack of reported contaminated sites within the Danube River Basin, the
Umweltbundesamt Vienna will recommend to the ICPDR for future activities following steps
(request from the APC-EG, 32nd APC-EG-meeting):
·
statistical extrapolation of the estimated number of contaminated sites in flood risk
areas (basis data from Austria) to get an idea how many contaminated sites (deposit
sites and industrial sites) can be expected within the Danube River Basin
·
support for the Danube-countries in collecting contaminated sites (deposit sites and
industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites)
·
providing of financial funds for the Danube Countries to built up a national collecting
system of contaminated sites for selected countries
·
support with technical experts if necessary
·
continue of collecting contaminated sites in flood risk areas within the Danube River
Basin
·
set prevention measures and remediation activities (for contaminated sites with an M2-
value 50).
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 35
6
TASK 3: REVISED CHECKLIST FOR SITE INVESTIGATION
A further main task of this contract was to develop a checklist for site inspections of high risk
contaminated sites in flood risk areas.
6.1 Checklist for the investigation and risk assessment of
contaminated sites in flood risk areas
All necessary information of a contaminated site will be collected by using the proposed
checklist. The checklist will also include general information for proposed safety measures,
which will allow the competent authorities to reduce the risk at a contaminated site in flood risk
areas and to increase public safety and to protect the environment in the Danube River Basin.
This checklist will serve as a hand guide for a desk-study and for a first visit of sites, suspected
to be contaminated by substances hazardous to water.
The purpose of this first desk-study and site visit is to find out:
·
where highly contaminated zones are suspected and located within flood risk areas
·
whether immediate action is needed
The data collected by making use of the checklist deliver the basis to assess if further steps are
necessary to enhance the safety level of contaminated sites in flood risk areas.
The checklist includes the following information:
·
General data, which providing information about location, extension type, ownership
structure of the site and about any precedent investigations
·
Hydrological data to estimate whether the contaminated site is endangered by flooding
(flooding potential)
·
Evaluation of the hazard situation answering the following questions:
o Is there an indication of potential hazards at the site?
o Is the site assessment with regard to the site's risk potential completed or is it
necessary to record further data?
o Which additional information is already available and can be used for the
assessment?
o Is an assessment possible or is a further data record or investigation necessary?
The checklist applies to all properties containing suspected contaminated sites in flood risk
areas.
The following sites in flood risk areas are covered by the scope of the checklist:
·
Sites suspected to have high potential for posing a hazard to water,
·
Sites contaminated as a result of former industrial activities and former waste disposal
operations, and
·
closed-down plants and plant components containing water endangering substances,
which are not effectively secured and might present a hazard to water in case of
flooding.
Radioactively contaminated sites do not fall within the scope of this checklist, nor do sites
presenting a potential hazard due to genetically modified organisms.
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 36
Former military sites and former military production sites are usually regarded as former
industrial sites.
Only those sites have to be investigated under this checklist, which
·
include more than 10.000 m³ of contaminated volume (former waste disposal sites,
landfills)
·
cover an area larger than 5.000 m² of a contaminated area (former industrial sites,
closed-down plants)
In certain cases a further investigation of the property (smaller than 10.000 m³ and/or smaller
than 5.000 m²) is still necessary if the suspicion of contamination for contaminated sites cannot
be totally excluded.
Facilities covered by this checklist include, for example:
·
Former waste disposal sites
·
Industrial and/or abandoned industrial sites
·
Components of closed-down plants
·
Underground installations
·
Surface facilities
·
Above-ground storage systems within buildings
·
Sewage sludge/waste-water treatment facilities
The proposed checklist consists of five parts which include the following templates:
(1) Preliminary investigation (basic study) of contaminated sites in flood risk areas
(2) Pre-assessment of contaminated sites in flood risk areas according to the M1
methodology
(3) Further investigations of contaminated sites in flood risk areas according to the M2
methodology
(4) Assessment and classification system priority classes of M2-values of high risk
contaminated sites in flood risk areas
(5) Measure catalogue (short, medium and long term measures)
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 37
Figure 8
Flowchart of the assessment of contaminated sites in flood risk areas
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 38
Please find the "Checklist for the Investigation and Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites in
Flood Risk Areas" in Appendix 2.
6.2 Recommendations
The Recommendation applies to all contaminated sites, which are prone to flooding and
contaminated by substances hazardous to water. The case of flooding includes, besides flooding,
·
backflow from water bodies or sewer systems or
·
a rise of the groundwater table as a result of long-term flood events.
The following sites are covered by the scope of the recommendation:
·
Sites suspected to have high potential for posing a hazard to water,
·
sites contaminated as a result of former industrial activities and former waste disposal
operations, and
·
closed-down plants and plant components containing water endangering substances,
which are not effectively secured and might present a hazard to water in case of
flooding.
Radioactively contaminated sites do not fall within the scope of these requirements, nor do sites
presenting a potential hazard due to genetically modified organisms.
Facilities covered by this recommendation include, for example:
·
Underground installations
·
Surface facilities
·
Above-ground storage systems within buildings
·
Components of closed-down plants
·
Former waste disposal sites
Safety requirements:
Administrative requirements:
·
Potentially contaminated sites should be recorded in appropriate database (e.g. land
registry).
·
In general the "Polluter Pays Principle" has to be applied
o in investigations necessary to determine the contamination situation of sites
suspected of being contaminated and further necessary measures and
o when formulation proposals for remedial actions and in their implementation.
·
The financing of investigations and remediation should be ensured, e.g. through
national agreements or funds, especially in cases where the polluter cannot be held
liable.
·
Authorities should be enabled to:
o carry out the monitoring of contaminated sites and sites suspected of being
contaminated
o order monitoring measures and/or remedial measures
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 39
·
Enabled authorities are responsible for ensuring that identified suspected sites are
investigated and, if necessary, remedial measures are implemented.
Requirements of risk estimation:
·
Site identification:
All abandoned industrial and waste disposal sites located in flood-risk areas are
suspected of being hazardous to water bodies in case of flooding. The following
measures should be carried out in an initial survey to determine whether suspect sites
are hazardous or non hazardous to water in case of flooding:
o Initial estimation of the risk by classifying the water endangering potential of
the former use (type of industrial branch or type of waste disposed of).
o Priorisation of suspect sites according to the estimated water endangering
potential.
o Estimation of the flood risk at the site.
·
Sites for which a safety risk has been identified should be investigated in more detail. A
first proposal for immediate measures should be formulated if there are obvious safety
risks.
·
Further site investigations:
They serve to generate additional information for a more precise characterisation of the
hazard situation of the investigated site.
·
This information should cover the following points
o a description of the contamination situation,
o the determination of any assets that would be endangered in case of flooding,
and
o a proposal for further measures to enhance the safety of the site, if necessary.
·
Detailed investigations
Based on detailed investigations and the identification of highly contaminated zones a
list of measures should be drawn up to serve as a basis for the selection of specific
remedial measures.
·
Results of each investigation step should be documented in a database.
Technical requirements:
Preventive measures:
Preventive measures include:
·
Controlling the stability and necessary static design and capacity of dams,
·
Regular supervision and control of sites with a high risk potential,
·
Increasing the retention time through:
o storage basins for heavy rainfall and snowmelt water
o building of reservoirs
o renaturation and/or protection of floodplain forests
·
Construction of dams at sites with a high flood risk.
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 40
Requirements for the remediation of contaminated sites:
Different decontamination methods are available for contaminated sites in flood-risk areas:
·
removal of soil and disposal in safe landfills,
·
removal of barrels and tanks, or
·
decontamination by chemical, physical or biological methods
In addition to conventional decontamination measures, containment measures, designed to
permanently prevent the spread of pollutants, can be considered. Such measures include for
example:
·
Encapsulating of contaminated bodies of soil
·
Sealing of surfaces
Investigations should be performed to select the optimal treatment for each site.
If immediate action is necessary because human health is threatened, appropriate protective or
restrictive measures should be carried out (e.g. restriction of access).
Advices for utilization of contaminated sites:
In the area of the contaminated site and in its immediate vicinity, at least the following points
have to be taken into consideration:
·
Possible change of use should neither result in environmental impairment (e.g.
additional mobilization of contaminants) nor generate additional potential danger.
·
As elevated concentrations of methane and carbon dioxide may occur in the area of
deposition, deep construction workings (e.g. subsurface running of pipelines and
conduits, construction of cellars) should generally be carried out, taking appropriate
safety measures (e.g. use of a gas detector)
·
Generally, in the course of construction work, the presence of landfill gas in possibly
major concentrations should be considered.
·
During the technical design of permanent subsurface installations (e.g. conduits and
shafts, cellars) an appropriate gas discharge (e.g. gas drainage) or adequate gas
impermeability should be assured.
·
Related to possible future construction works and the sealing of surfaces, the mode for
run-off of precipitation has to be investigated carefully. An elevated mobilization of
contaminants and an elevated entry of contaminants into the groundwater through
seepage have to be excluded.
·
Waste excavated from deep construction workings has to be treated and deposited
according to current legislation.
·
Based on investigation results so far, it can be assumed that part of the deposit does
not comply with the regulations of the landfill directive for rubble, therefore higher costs
have to be anticipated accordingly at the disposal of larger volumes of excavated
material.
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 41
7 MEETINGS
The Consultant was expected to participate at a site visit by the WGI to test the checklist and to incorporate
necessary changes into the checklist, further to attend one WGI meeting and up to two APC EG meetings.
7.1 31st APC-EG meeting in Bratislava (7th and 8th April 2005)
At the 31st APC-EG meeting (7th, 8th April 2005 in Bratislava) all countries were asked to report
on the following missing data by the end of May 2005:
·
Factor flooding potential (FP);
·
Factor safety measures (SM);
·
Industrial and abandoned industrial sites
7.2 Meeting in Vienna (29th July 2005)
On the 29th July 2005 a meeting was held in Vienna (UNDP/GEF) with Mr. Peter Whalley, Mr.
Aurel Varduca, Mr. Igor Liska, Mr. Gerd Winkelmann-Oei and Mrs. Hermine Weber regarding the
next WGI meeting in Romania, to clarify responsibilities.
In this meeting the following points were discussed:
·
Next WGI meeting envisaged in Romania
·
For the 32nd APC-EG meeting in Berlin (September 2005) the participation of Ms.
Hermine Weber is not required.
·
Responsibilities WGI meeting (coordinating, organization)
7.3 32nd APC-EG meeting in Berlin (23rd, 24th September 2005)
The 32nd meeting of the APC-Expert Group was held from 23rd to 24th Sept. 2005 in Berlin. The
participation of the Umweltbundesamt Vienna was not necessary. A short presentation on the
work completed by the Umweltbundesamt Vienna was given by Mr. Peter Whalley (UNDP/GEF).
According to the minutes of the 32nd APC-EG meeting the countries reported problems in
collecting the necessary data, the major reason being the missing legislative basis. This
"working list" of contaminated sites (deposit sites and industrial and/or abandoned industrial
sites) in flood risk areas should continue in its preparation as it will be relevant for the future
programme of measures.
The countries Bosnia & Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Moldova and Serbia were asked to send
information on plans regarding the collection of data on deposit sites by October 2005.
The Umweltbundesamt Vienna was asked to report on the reasons for missing information on
the contaminated sites in flood risk areas and to give an expert judgement and
recommendations on future perspectives and activities.
M2 methodology (2nd Progress Report, July 2005) will be discussed at the meeting of the
Working Group in Inventories (WGI), which was envisaged February/March 2006.
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 42
7.4 Workshop on M2 methodology and refineries pilot project
(17. July 2006 and 1st AP Task Group Meeting in
Constanta, Rumania (20.-21. July 2006)
From 18. 21. July 2006 the seminar "Activities for Accident Prevention Pilot Project
Refineries was held in Constanta, Rumania. During this seminar the workshop "workshop on M2
methodology and refineries pilot project" was implemented. A working group meeting "1st Task
Group Meeting" was held afterwards (20. - 21. July 2006, Constanta, Rumania).
Output of the meeting/workshop:
The checklist "Checklist for the Investigation and Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites in
Flood Risk Areas" was tested on a site visit on 20th July 2006. Contaminated deposit site (see
Appendix 1, Table 1, item 97): Rompetrol in Navodari, Constanta, Rumania (see Picture 1,
Picture 2, Picture 3 and Picture 4).
The checklist was discussed and agreed by the members of the seminar "workshop on M2
methodology and refineries pilot project"(20th, 21st July 2006). Comments on the tested
checklist were incorporated into the checklist by the author.
Picture 1
Map from Rompetrol, Navodari, Rumania, 20th July 2006
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 43
Picture 2
Participants of the workshop at Rompetrol (in front of the main-
entrance of Rompetrol), 20th July 2006
Short description of the contaminated deposit site:
Picture 3
Contaminated deposit site (oil sludge pond), 20th July 2006
·
Oil sludge pond, r0 = 5
M1-value: 55
·
Volume: 130.000 m³
·
Factor of flooding potential (FP): 3
M2-value: 333
·
Factor of safety measures (SM): 2
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 44
See Table 11 evaluation table for deposit sites (see also Appendix 2, Table 4)
Table 11
Evaluation table for deposit sites
According the M2 methodology further investigations are necessary by taking into account the
factor of "flooding potential" (FP) and the factor of "safety measures" (SM).
M2 = M1 x FP x SM
M2 = M1 x FP x SM = 55 x 3 x 2 = 333
Assessment and classification system for M2 = 333 priority class: 2; need for further
measures to be established at the site: high
Planned measures at the site within the next 4 years:
·
Remove/excavate the hole deposit site and contaminated underground and dispose it
secure
·
Decontamination of the soil/area
·
Decontamination of groundwater
UMWELTBUNDESAMT / WEBER HERMINE
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 45
Picture 4
Participants of the "workshop on M2 mehtodology" at Rompetrol,
20th July 2006
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 47
8
RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS
Six countries reported relevant deposit sites in flood risk areas (in total 86 deposit sites within the Danube
River Basin). But only four countries submitted additional necessary information about the flooding situation
and the safety measures taken at the contaminated site. For 20 contaminated sites (out of 38 reported deposit
sites with an M1-value 47) an M2-value could be calculated.
Regarding contaminated industrial sites and/or abandoned industrial sites the information is limited. Only
Austria reported 11 contaminated industrial sites in flood risk areas in their country. Germany reported no
relevant industrial and/or abandoned industrial site within the Danube River Basin.
Because of the lack of reported contaminated sites within the Danube River Basin, the Umweltbundesamt
Vienna will recommend the following to the ICPDR for future activities (request from the APC-EG, 32nd APC-
EG meeting):
·
Statistical extrapolation of the estimated number of contaminated sites in flood risk areas (basic data
from Austria) to get an idea of how many contaminated sites (deposit sites and industrial sites) can
be expected within the Danube River Basin.
·
Support for the Danube countries in recording contaminated sites (deposit sites and industrial and/or
abandoned industrial sites)
·
providing financial funds for the Danube Countries to build up a national recording system of
contaminated sites for selected countries;
·
support from technical experts, if necessary.
·
Continue recording contaminated sites in flood risk areas within the Danube River Basin.
·
Take preventative measures and remediation activities (for contaminated sites with an M2-value
50)
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist
page 49
9 LITERATURE
·
ICPDR APC Expert Group, Recommendation "Safety Requirements for Contaminated
Sites in Flood-risk Areas
·
ICPDR, Methodology for the Pre-Assessment of Suspected Contaminated Sites in the
Danube River Basin (M1 methodology), September 2004
·
Outputs of the Phase 1 of the DRP are available from the DRP´s web site www.undp-
drp.org
·
Activities of the APC EG (and the WGE) are available from the ICPDR´s web site
www.icpdr.org
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist Appendixes & Annexes
page 51
APPENDIXES & ANNEXES
APPENDIX 1
Working list of reported contaminated sites (data set)
Table (a): All reported deposit and industrial/abandoned sites (97
records)
Table (b): All reported deposit and industrial/abandoned sites (97
records) (colored)
Table (c): Reported deposit sites, Slovakia (18 records)
Table (d): Reported deposit sites, Hungary (32 records)
Table (e): Reported deposit sites, Romania (25 records)
Table (f): Reported deposit and industrial sites, Austria (5 deposit
sites, 11 industrial sites)
Table (g): Reported deposit sites, Ukraine (3 records
Table (h): Reported deposit sites, Ukraine (3 records)
Table (i): Reported deposit sites, Czech Republic (1 record)
Table (j): Reported deposit sites (Igor Liska, Version: 13.06.2005) (98
records)
APPENDIX 2
Checklist for the Investigation and Risk Assessment of
Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1: Questionnaire of Contaminates Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 2: Branch Catalogue of Germany
Annex 3: European Waste Catalogue
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist Annexes
APPENDIX 1
WORKING LIST OF REPORTED CONTAMINATED
SITES (DATA SET)
Table (a): All reported deposit and industrial/abandoned sites (97 records)
Table (b): All reported deposit and industrial/abandoned sites (97 records) (colored)
Table (c): Reported deposit sites, Slovakia (18 records)
Table (d): Reported deposit sites, Hungary (32 records)
Table (e): Reported deposit sites, Romania (25 records)
Table (f): Reported deposit and industrial sites, Austria (5 deposit sites, 11 industrial sites)
Table (g): Reported deposit sites, Ukraine (3 records
Table (h): Reported deposit sites, Ukraine (3 records)
Table (i): Reported deposit sites, Czech Republic (1 record)
Table (j): Reported deposit sites (Igor Liska, Version: 13.06.2005) (98 records)
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Appendix 1, Table (a): All reported deposit and industrial/abandoned sites (97 records) (30.07.2006):
n.d. ... not determinable
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
m2-value /
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
or
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
comments
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
45_07_18_N
Old Danube-
waste not
no data for
1
Romania
Tulcea
Turcoaia
#WERT!
5000
sterile pond
not specified not specified
440.000
n.e.
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
3
3
n.d.
28_11_05_E
Macin Arm
specified
waste type
M34, x=
Tanklager für
Mineralöl,
22.
Tankfarm
2
Austria
Wien
Wien
W12
5337100, y=
1
Danube
industrial site Mineralölpro
1950-1992 Kohlenwasse
100100
1.000.000
5,0
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
59
ind.site
0
1
0
4
Donaustadt
Lobau
13000
dukte
rstoffe
PAK, Cyanid,
M34, x=
Mineralöl,
11.
Gas works
3
Austria
Wien
Wien
W18
5338402, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
Gaswerk
1973 - 1989 Phenole,Am
325.000
5,0
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58
ind.site
0
3
0
4
Simmering
Simmering
6854
monium,
Sulfat
Mineralöllage
M34, x=
11.
rung,
Mineralöl,
4
Austria
Wien
Wien
EBS-BP-TKV
W1
5337400, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
0050
seit 1942
070100
200.000
5,0
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58
ind.site
0
2
0
4
Simmering
Tierkörperver
CKW
10000
wertung
Cyanid,
Kohlenwasse
M34, x=
Chemische
1923-
rstoffe,
5
Austria
Wien
23. Liesing
Wien
Siebenhirten
W8
5333000, y= -
1
Liesing
industrial site Grundstoffin
150.000
5,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58
ind.site
0
3
0
4
1960/61
Phenol,
2800
dustrie
Ammonium,
Nitrit, Sulfat
Teerag-
M34, x=
PAK,
11.
Teerverarbeit
6
Austria
Wien
Wien
Asdag-
W21
5338000, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
1926-1981
Phenole,
170701
130.000
5,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58
ind.site
0
2
0
4
Simmering
ung
Simmering
8600
BTX
refinery
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Mineralöl-
Mineralöl,
7
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg Tuttendorfer
N16
5355250, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
0050
seit 1882
180.000
4,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58
ind.site
0
3
0
4
h
Raffinerie
CKW
Breite
250
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Shipyard
Metalle,
8
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg
N33
5356050, y= -
3
Danube
industrial site
Schiffbau
0420
1920-1960
200.000
4,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
57
ind.site
3
3
513
2
h
Korneuburg
Mineralöl
1100
Central
Transdanubian
X=642 735
industrial
industrial
190200
9
Hungary
Environmental
Dunaújváros Dunaferr Inc.
#WERT!
Y=174 625
2
Danube
sewage
1.500.000
1.500.000
5
55
57
0
3
0
4
deposit
190804
Iinspectorates
sludge
Area
municipal
waste,
accompanied
Stadt
Stadt
Deponie
R: 4543249
1946 until
by
10
Germany
2
200
Danube
old deposit
1.450.000
3,5
46
46
3
1
m1 < 47
n.d.
Straubing
Straubing
Peterswöhrd
H: 5417000
1977
construction
(m1 < 47)
waste and
industrial
waste
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
refinery
Mineralöl-
Mineralöl,
11
Austria
Mödling
Vösendorf
N20
5331650, y= -
1
Petersbach industrial site
0670
1845-1994
145.000
4,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
57
ind.site
0
3
0
4
h
Vösendorf
Raffinerie
PAK
1200
Leather
M31, x=
Lederverarbe
12
Austria
Kärnten
Klagenfurt
Klagenfurt
factory
K22
5166094, y=
1
Glan
industrial site
2070
1930-1990
Chrom
120.000
4,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
57
ind.site
0
3
0
4
itung
Neuner
75848
slags from
primary and
secondary
melting,
(other not
specified
100501,
Tamava
inorganic
060199,
46_06_35_N
50
industrial
13
Romania
Sibiu
Copsa Mica
#WERT!
0
Mare River
wastes other
100504,
1.350.000
5
55
57
1
2
114
3
24_14_27_E
2
waste
Visa Brook
inorganic
170405,
matters from
170701
thermic
processes as
suspensions
or dust, iron
and steel)
not
processed
slag, lining
and
refractory
waste
materials,
100202
furnace slag,
100206
foundry
100903
slag and ash
shapes
14
Romania
Hunedoara
Calan
#WERT!
0
3500
Strei River
101003
1.300.000
5
55
57
1
3
171
3
pond
containing
050603
organic
100901
ligands,
101001
wastes from
mixture
preparation
previously
thermic
processing,
other tars
not
processed
slag, lining
and
refractory
waste
materials,
100202,
furnace slag,
100206,
foundry
100903,
45_43_54_N
slag and ash
shapes
15
Romania
Hunedoara
Calan
15
0
3500
Strei River
deposit
101003,
1300000
5
55
57
1
3
171
3
22_59_35_E
pond
containing
050603,
organic
100901,
ligands,wast
101001
es from
mixture
preparation
previously
thermic
processing,
other tars
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
CKW,
Trichlorethen
Donau
M31, x=
Chemische
,
Sankt Veit an
16
Austria
Kärnten
Brückl
Chemie
K5
5177850, y=
2
Gurk
industrial site Grundstoffin
0050
seit 1909
Tetrachloreth
50.000
5,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
56
ind.site
1
2
112
3
der Glan
Brückl
91450
dustrie
en,
Hexachlorbut
adien
red-sludge
ZSNP, Ziar
Hron 125,3
bed, danger
alkaline
no data for
17
Slovakia
4
Hron
since 1957
200115
1000000
5
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
55
0
no data
n.d.
n./Hronom
r.km
waste
water
SM
deposit
deposit of
deposit of
Malina 6,0
danger
no data for
18
Slovakia
A.S.A. Zohor
3
Morava
mixed
since 1996
130000
350000
5
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
55
3
no data
n.d.
r.km
waste, oil
SM
danger waste
waste
The Odessa
area Izmail
Storehouse
no data for
19
Ukraine
Cellulose
200.000
5
55
55
no data
no data
n.d.
CaCl + Na2O
FP and SM
cardboard
combine
The Odessa
area Izmail
cleaning
23300 per
no data for
20
Ukraine
Cellulose
4
55
53
no data
no data
n.d.
contructions
day
FP and SM
cardboard
combine
M31, x=
Metalle,
Sankt Veit an
Landfill
21
Austria
Kärnten
Althofen
K7
5192050, y=
1
Gurk
deposit
0840
Industriemüll
seit 1922
Mineralisieru
500.000
5,0
50
55
0
2
0
4
der Glan
Roßwiese
85950
ng
CKW
Industrieabfäl
(Tetrachloret
M31, x=
le,
hen,
Sankt Veit an
lime dump
22
Austria
Kärnten
Brückl
K20
5178385, y=
1
Gurk
deposit
0420
Bauschutt,
seit 1930
Trichlorethen
250.000
4,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
51
0
3
0
4
der Glan
site Brückl I/II
91658
Aushubmater
,
ial
Hexachlorbut
adien)
Hausmüll,
erhöhte
M31, x=
Bauschutt,
Mineralisieru
23
Austria
Tirol
Schwaz
Pill, Weer
Landfill Pill
T7
5243100, y=
1
Inn
deposit
2070
Industrie-
ng,
1.000.000
4,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
50
0
3
0
4
10100
/Gewerbemül
reduzierende
l
Verhältnisse
Hausmüll,
reduzierende
M34, x=
Bauschutt,
Verhältnisse,
Niederöstereic
24
Austria
Tulln
Tulln
Landfill Tulln
N49
5356960, y= -
3
Danube
deposit
2070
Industrie-
seit 1934
erhöhte
200.000
3,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
42
3
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
h
20420
/Gewerbemül
Mineralisieru
(m1 < 47)
l
ng
Central
Transdanubian
Bakonyi
industrial
25
Hungary
Environmental
Ajka
1
0
Torna
gray sludge
190101
15.000.000
15.000.000
4
49
53
0
1
0
4
Erm Inc.
deposit
Iinspectorates
Area
46_33_12_n
slag and ash
26
Romania
Bacau
Letea Veche
2
0
1,5
Siret River
fuel burning
100100
13.150.000
4
49
53
3
2
318
2
26_56_51_E
pond
Middle Danube
Environmental
Fixon Bt.-
old industrial Old mining
slag and dust
190101
27
Hungary
Lrinci
3
0
Zagyva
5.000.000
4
49
53
0
3
0
4
Inspectorates
Humiron Ltd.
site
tailing
ash
190103
area
deposit of
liqued
BUCINA,
Zolna 1,5
industrial
no data for
28
Slovakia
4
Hron
waste,fenole,
since 1950
190106
20000
5
51
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
51
0
no data
n.d.
Horny Sturec
r.km
liquid waste
SM
formaldehyd
e
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Tankfarm
Mineralöllage
29
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg
N46
5328350, y= -
3
Danube
industrial site
0010
1900-1975
Mineralöl
10.000
4,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
51
ind.site
3
2
306
2
h
Mare
r
1250
AES borsodi
North
Energetikai
Hungarian
sludgewater
Ltd
x=800 150
old mining
800.000 and
30
Hungary
Environmental
Tiszaújváros
1
2
Tisa (483)
and slag-
100100
1.400.000
4
49
50
0
2
0
4
Tiszapalkony
y=286 711
tailing
1.400.000
Inspectorate
dust-ash
Area
ai Herm
Béghin-Say
Cukorgyár
Middle Tisa
Inc.(technolo
X=734 750
contaminate
Environmental
industrial
waste water
waste water
31
Hungary
Szolnok
gy waste-
2
Y=200 250
2
Tisa (330)
d surface
1.300.000
4
49
50
1
1
50
3
Inspectorates
deposit
sludgein lake
sludge
water
water
Area
thickerer)
not specified
Tumu
43_43_50_N
pyrite ash
(wastes
32
Romania
Teleorman
1
0
150
Danube
060400
1.900.000
4
49
50
1
2
100
3
Magurele
24_52_05_E
pond
containing
metals)
slags from
primary and
secondary
melting, other
not specified
100501,
Tarnava
inorganic
060199,
Mare
industrial
wastes, other
33
Romania
Sibiu
Copsa Mica
18
0
50; 2
deposit
100504,
1350000
4
49
50
1
2
100
3
River;Visa
wastes
inorganic
170405,
brook
matters from
thermic
170701
processes as
susspenssions
or dust,iron
and steel)
CHEMKO,
Ondava 16,2
deposit -
leach out
no data for
34
Slovakia
3
Bodrog
since 1955
190202
800000
4
49
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
49
0
no data
n.d.
Strazske
rkm
industrial
during flood
SM
no data for
35
Slovakia
DUSLO, Sala
3
Vah 54 r.km
Vah
DUSLO Sala
sludge bed
since 1980
190804
750000
4
49
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
49
0
no data
n.d.
SM
sludge
CHEMKO,
Ondava 43,2
deposit -
leach out
no data for
36
Slovakia
3
Bodrog
since 1959
190202
600000
4
49
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
49
0
no data
n.d.
Strazske
rkm
sludge
during flood
SM
reservoir
Slag and
slag and ash
37
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
1
0
3000
Danube
ashes from
100100
655.000
4
49
49
1
2
98
3
pond
coal burning
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
Forrós-
Middle Tisa
BERVA Inc.(
X=744 160
belwatercana
contaminate
Environmental
chemical
industrial
polluted
10.500 and
38
Hungary
Heves
#WERT!
Y=251 350
0
l (8) Hanyi-ér
hydrocarbon
d soil and
5
51,0
#WERT!
#WERT!
51
0
3
0
4
Inspectorates
pollution )
deposit
earth
5.000
(16) Tisa
groundwater
Area
(388)
not specified
(wastes from
ferrous
pieces
Ialomita
slag and ash
no data for
39
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
23
0
200
deposit
foundry,
100900
12000
5
51
51
0
no data
n.d.
River
pond
SM
some of
them might
be
dangerous)
deposit of
liqued
Bucina,
Zolna 1,5
industrial
no data for
40
Slovakia
waste,fenole,
190106
20.000
5
51
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
51
0
no data
n.d.
Horny Sturec
r.km
deposit
SM
formaldehyd
e
Sludge
lagoons in
m³ too small,
Czech
Desna river
industrial
the waste
41
Sumperk
0
heavy metals
sludge
6.000
5
49
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
49
0
no data
no data for
n.d.
Republic
(river km 6)
deposit
water
(m³ too
SM
treatment
small)
plant
deposit of
PETROCHE
Hron 208
gudrons
overspill by
no data for
42
Slovakia
4
Hron
since 1964
190202
120000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
0
no data
n.d.
MA, Predajna
r.km
PETROCHE
heavy raining
SM
MA
ENO,
ENO
Nitra 128
deposit of fly-
no data for
43
Slovakia
Zemianske
3
Nitra
Zemianske
since 1965
190103
300000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
0
no data
n.d.
r.km
ash
SM
Kostolany
Kostolany
KOVOHUTY,
Hornad
sludge
leach out
no data for
44
Slovakia
3
Hornad
since 1967
190202
285000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
10
no data
n.d.
Krompachy
186,0 rkm
deposit
during flood
SM
sludge
BUKOCEL,
Ondava 48,7
deposit -
leach out
no data for
45
Slovakia
Vranov
3
Bodrog
since 1983
190202
153000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
1
no data
n.d.
rkm
links bank
during flood
SM
n.Toplou
meander
R: 4390858
1960 until
municipal
46
Germany
Dillingen
Dillingen
Hühnerwörth
2
200
Danube
old deposit
470.000
4,0
47
47
3
1
141
3
H: 5382545
1977
waste
Central
Transdanubian
X=642 735
Dunapack
Danube
industrial
47
Hungary
Environmental
Dunaújváros
1
Y=174 625
2
mix sludge
190100
212.000
212.000
4
47
47
0
3
0
4
Inc.
(1573)
deposit
Iinspectorates
Area
North
Tisa
Hungarian
Chemical
x=798 042
industry
industrial
48
Hungary
Environmental
Tiszaújváros
Self-
2
Y=287 515
2
Tisa (484)
sewage
190100
211.000
4
47
47
0
2
0
4
deposit
Inspectorate
contained
earth dam
Area
plant
deposit of
Skladka
Semetes /in
common and
leaking tube
no data for
49
Slovakia
TKO,
2
Vah
1968-2000
190202
105000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
3
no data
4
tube/
industrial
line
SM
Turzovka
waste
Wastes from
43_59_20_N
industrial
50
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
0
250
Danube
sugar beet
020400
435.000
4
47
47
1
3
141
3
22_56_30_E
waste
processing
Hór Brook (2)
North
Mezkövesd
Kánya Brook
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
,,B" area
x=768 200
Mezkövesd
(14) Rima
old military
polluted soil
300.000 and
51
Hungary
Environmental
Old Fuel
1
Y=274 000
0
?
4
47
#WERT!
#WERT!
47
0
3
0
4
Airport
Brook (8)
site
and
60.000
Inspectorate
depot
Area
Tisa (434)
groundwater
heavy metal
Middle Danube
Abandon
and
Budapest,
Environmental
sewage
hydrocarbon
52
Hungary
Csepel-
2
0
Danube
deposit
060405
300.000
300.000
4
47
47
1
3
141
3
Inspectorates
sludge
(CH) polluted
island Nord
area
depots
organic
compounds
not specified
(waste
solutions and
hazardous
muds
m³ too
m³ too
53
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
3
0
1500
Ilfov Brook
110103
3.028
5
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
100
47
0
no data
waste
containing
(m³ too
small
small
chromium
small)
but without
cyanides
organic
solvents,
industrial
washing
m³ too
m³ too
54
Romania
Giurgiu
Giurgiu
3
0
3000
Danube
deposit
070104
3000
5
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
0
no data
wastes
liquids and
(m³ too
small
small
mother
small)
solutions
deposit of
danger
Malina 6,0
industrial
premixed
no data for
55
Slovakia
A.S.A. Zohor
190202
350.000
cca 350000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
3
no data
n.d.
waste, oil
r.km
deposit
waste
SM
waste
deposit of
gudrons
Hron 208
industrial
overspill by
no data for
56
Slovakia
Predajna
050100
120.000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
0
no data
n.d.
PETROCHE
r.km
deposit
heavy raining
SM
MA
Industrial
M31, x=
deposit
Industrieabfäl
Magnesium,
57
Austria
Kärnten
Villach Land
Ferndorf
K21
5177019, y=
1
Drau
deposit
1030
seit 1914
500.000
3,5
42
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
42
0
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
Heraklithwer
le
Sulfat
22827
(m1 < 47)
ke Ferndorf
NCHZ,
Nitra 123
NCHZ
deposit of
m1 < 47, no
58
Slovakia
4
Nitra
since 1968
20402
12000000
3
40
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
0
no data
m1 < 47
Novaky
r.km
Novaky
calc-sludge
(m1 < 47)
data for SM
Upper Danube
X=592 500
VII.
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
59
Hungary
1
Y=265 000
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
3.250.000
3
40
45
no data
no data
data for FP
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
03/29,30,31
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
and SM
area
not specified
m³ too
(muds from
small, m1
hazardous
m³ too
60
Romania
Dambovita
Gaesti
6
0
1100
Arges River
deposit
industrial
190804
30.6
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
wastes
waste water
(m1 < 47)
small
data for FP
treatment)
and SM
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
not specified
(waste
solutions and
cyanuric
muds
(alkalines)
with heavy
m³ too
metals
small, m1
hazardous
110101,
m³ too
61
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
4
0
not specified
deposit
others than
10.5
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
wastes
110103
chromium,
(m1 < 47)
small
data for FP
wastes
and SM
solutions and
muds
containing
chromium
but without
cyanides)
Central
Torna (52)
Transdanubian
MAL Inc. I-
m1 < 47,
x=534 000
Marcal (97,8) industrial
red dross
62
Hungary
Environmental
Ajka
VIII. store,
5
0
010303
29.000.000
29.000.000
3
40
45
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
y=194 000
Rába (
deposit
settlements
Iinspectorates
reclaimed
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
Area
204,6)
45_53_47_N
slag and ash
63
Romania
Hunedoara
Mintia
13
0
500
Mures River
deposit
fireplace ash
100101
9700000
3
40
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
1
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
22_53_28_E
pond
(m1 < 47)
Wastes from
47_15_10_N
industrial
64
Romania
Iasi
Blagesti
14
0
500
Siret River
sugar
020400
100.000
4
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
1
2
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
26_45_32_E
waste
processing
(m1 < 47)
not specified
(waste
m³ too
solutions and
small, m1
Lalomita
hazardous
muds
m³ too
65
Romania
Dambovita
Fieni
15
0
180
110103
20
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
River
waste
containing
(m1 < 47)
small
chromium
data for FP
but without
and SM
cyanides
not specified
( waste
solutions and
cyanuric
muds
(alkalines)
with heavy
m³ too
metals other
small, m1
hazardous
110101
m³ too
66
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
0
not specified
than
11
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
waste
110103
chromium,
(m1 < 47)
small
data for FP
waste
and SM
solutions and
muds
containing
chromium
but without
cyanides)
not specified
(waste
solutions and
m³ too
cyanuric
small, m1
hazardous
muds
m³ too
67
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
0
800
Ilfov Brook
110101
6
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
waste
(alkalines)
(m1 < 47)
small
with heavy
data for FP
metals
and SM
others than
chromium)
not specified
(waste
solutions and
m³ too
cyanuric
small, m1
hazardous
muds
m³ too
68
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
1
0
800
Ilfov brook
deposit
110101
6
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
wastes
(alkalines)
(m1 < 47)
small
with heavy
data for FP
metals
and SM
others than
chromium)
m1 < 47,
industrial
wood
69
Romania
Bacau
Bacau
17
0
3000
Bistrita River
deposit
not specified
40000
4
43
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
43
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
wastes
processing
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
the forest
village of
m1 < 47,
"Zatova", str/
industrial
70
Ukraine
town type
0
600
Uzh
wastes
Solid wastes
1.48.21
30.000
4
43
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
43
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Budivelnikov,
deposit
Perechin
(m1 < 47)
1
FP and SM
m1 < 47,
PETROCHE
deposit of
Hron 206
industrial
washed up
71
Slovakia
050100
50.000
4
43
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
43
0
no data
no data
m1 < 47
MA area
gudrons
r.km
deposit
during flood
(m1 < 47)
SM
Upper Danube
VI.
m1 < 47,
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
72
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
1.800.000
3
40
42
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
06/8
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
FP and SM
Üll-Laposi
(7) Német-éri
Middle Tisa
(13)
X=781 755
Old Soviet
m1 < 47,
Environmental
Military
Hortobágy-
old military
polluted
contaminate
73
Hungary
Kunmadaras
#WERT!
Y=232 001
0
Military
hydrocarbon
14.500
?
4
41
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
41
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Airport
Berettyó (82)
site
earth
d soil
Airport
(m1 < 47)
Area
Hármas-
FP and SM
Körös (61)
Tisa (243)
hydrocarbon
m³ too
Middle Danube
Former
(CH)
small, m1
Environmental
Kiskunlacház
old military
Soviet
74
Hungary
#WERT!
0
Danube
aviation
9.000
?
4
41
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
41
(m1 < 47)
no data
no data
< 47, no m³ too small
Inspectorates
a
site
military
kerosine
volume too
area
airport
data for FP
pollution
small
and SM
Upper Danube
X= 600 871
VIII.
m1 < 47,
Environmental
Neszmély
Old mining
75
Hungary
#WERT!
Y=264 058
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
5.000.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
0125
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
FP and SM
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
Upper Danube
III.
m1 < 47,
Environmental
Almásfüzit
x=590 300
Old mining
76
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
1.000.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
118
y=265 600
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
FP and SM
Upper Danube
V.
m1 < 47,
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
77
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
800.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
06/10
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
FP and SM
Upper Danube
IV.
m1 < 47,
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
78
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
600.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
06/12
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
FP and SM
TVM Inc.
Middle Tisa
(waste of
X=732 950
m1 < 47,
Environmental
industrial
polluted
contaminate
79
Hungary
Szolnok
chemical
#WERT!
Y=199 716
2
Tisa (332)
200202
600.000
3
40,0
40
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
deposit
earth
d soil
industry)
(m1 < 47)
Area
FP and SM
Körös
Establishme
communal
reclaimed
m1 < 47,
Environmental
X=806 600
80
Hungary
Békéscsaba
n organic
#WERT!
0
Nádas canal
waste
waste
780.000
3
40
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
40
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Y=148 550
waste
storage
storage
(m1 < 47)
Area
FP and SM
Middle Danube
Budapest,
m1 < 47,
Environmental
Metallochemi
Danube
old industrial Old mining
Pb, Zn, Cu,
81
Hungary
XXII.
#WERT!
0
metalslag
010400
650.000
650.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
a
(1479,4)
site
tailing
Cd
Harangozó u.
(m1 < 47)
area
FP and SM
m1 < 47,
DROTOVNE,
Drotovna
Fe- sludge
82
Slovakia
3
Vah 97 r.km
Vah
since 1962
190102
160000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
0
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Hlohovec
Hlohovec
bed
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
Upper Danube
I-II
m1 < 47,
Environmental
Almásfüzit
x=590 327
Danube 1749-
Old mining
83
Hungary
1
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
450.000
3
37
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
119/11 Hrsz
y=265 665
1761 km
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
FP and SM
closed
deposit of
TKO,
deposit of
m1 < 47,
common and
84
Slovakia
Kysucke
2
Kysuca
Vah
fouling
1960-1998
190601
150000
3
37
#WERT!
#WERT!
100
37
0
no data
no data for m1 < 47
industrial
Nove Mesto
industrial
(m1 < 47)
waste
SM
sludge
North
MH
Tarna (49)
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
x=736 250
m1 < 47,
Tarnaszentm
Zagyva (58) old military
polluted soil
69.000 and
85
Hungary
Environmental
Tarnaszentm
1
Y=281 850
0
?
4
37
#WERT!
#WERT!
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
ária Fuel
Tisa (335
site
and
69.000
Inspectorate
ária
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
Area
depot
groundwater
North
MH
Kánya Brook
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
Mezkövesd
(14) Rima
m1 < 47,
Mezkövesd
x=762 425
old military
polluted soil
52.500 and
86
Hungary
Environmental
Fuel depot
2
0
Brook (8)
?
4
37
#WERT!
#WERT!
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Hrsz: 0456/2
Y=272 900
site
and
67.500
Inspectorate
,,K" area
Tisa (434)
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
Area
groundwater
Middle Danube
hydrocarbon
Former
m1 < 47,
Environmental
old military
(CH) polluted
308000 and
87
Hungary
Tököl
3
0
Danube
military
?
3
37
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
site
soil and
209.900
airport
(m1 < 47)
area
groundwater
FP and SM
not specified
44_59_15_N
Lalomita
slag and ash
88
Romania
Dambovita
Doicesti
4
0
50
(fireplace
100101
500.000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
1
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
25_24_02_E
River
pond
ash)
(m1 < 47)
Old Danube-
89
Romania
Tulcea
Turcoaia
20
0
5000
deposit
sterile pond
not specified not specified
440000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
3
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
Macin Arm
(m1 < 47)
industrial
Wastes from
90
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
11
0
250
Danube
deposit
sugar beet
435000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
1
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
wastes
processing
(m1 < 47)
South
Transdanubian
X=622 150
Communal
Communal
m1 < 47,
Danube
settlement
91
Hungary
Environmental
Mohács
12
Y= 74 880
0
organic
organic
200301
370.000
3
37
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
(1445)
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
Area
South
Transdanubian
X=529 650
Communal
Communal
m1 < 47,
settlement
92
Hungary
Environmental
Barcs
13
Y= 70 890
0
Drava (153)
organic
organic
300.000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
Area
Körös
Establishme
communal
m1 < 47,
Environmental
X=818 000
93
Hungary
Gyula
n organic
14
0
White Körös
waste
200301
273.773
273.773
3
37
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Y=146 100
waste
storage
(m1 < 47)
Area
FP and SM
ELEKTROLU
X - LEHEL
Middle Tisa
Ltd WDS-1
X=711 216
m1 < 47,
Environmental
Zagyva (67)
industrial
polluted
contaminate
94
Hungary
Jászberény
(waste of
15
Y=237 746
0
200202 155.000
3
37,0
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Tisa (336)
deposit
earth
d soil
chemical
(m1 < 47)
Area
FP and SM
industry )
South
Transdanubian
X=585 860
Communal
Communal
m1 < 47,
settlement
95
Hungary
Environmental
Harkány
16
Y= 56 330
0
Drava (72)
organic
organic
114.000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
Area
South
Transdanubian
X=590 640
Communal
Communal
m1 < 47,
settlement
96
Hungary
Environmental
Siklós
16
Y= 53 770
0
Drava (65)
organic
organic
112.000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
Area
Rompetrol in
Danube,
industrial
oil sludge
industrial
97
Romania
Navodari
Constanta
130.000
55
3
2
330
2
Navodari
black sea
deposit
pond
deposit
Appendix 1, Table (b): All reported deposit and industrial/abandoned sites (97 records) (coloured) (30.07.2006):
deposit sites
industrial sites
n.d. ... not determinable
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity in
Risk value
relevant
flood
safety
m2-value / or
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
m1-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
m³
r0
for m2
potential measures comments
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
45_07_18_N
Old Danube-
waste not
no data for waste
1
Romania
Tulcea
Turcoaia
#WERT!
5000
sterile pond
not specified not specified
440.000
3
3
n.d.
28_11_05_E
Macin Arm
specified
type
M34, x=
Tanklager für
Mineralöl,
22.
Tankfarm
2
Austria
Wien
Wien
W12
5337100, y=
1
Danube
industrial site Mineralölpro
1950-1992 Kohlenwasse
100100
1.000.000
5,0
59
ind.site
0
1
0
4
Donaustadt
Lobau
13000
dukte
rstoffe
PAK, Cyanid,
M34, x=
Mineralöl,
11.
Gas works
3
Austria
Wien
Wien
W18
5338402, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
Gaswerk
1973 - 1989 Phenole,Am
325.000
5,0
58
ind.site
0
3
0
4
Simmering
Simmering
6854
monium,
Sulfat
Mineralöllage
M34, x=
11.
rung,
Mineralöl,
4
Austria
Wien
Wien
EBS-BP-TKV
W1
5337400, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
0050
seit 1942
070100
200.000
5,0
58
ind.site
0
2
0
4
Simmering
Tierkörperver
CKW
10000
wertung
Cyanid,
Kohlenwasse
M34, x=
Chemische
1923-
rstoffe,
5
Austria
Wien
23. Liesing
Wien
Siebenhirten
W8
5333000, y= -
1
Liesing
industrial site Grundstoffin
150.000
5,0
58
ind.site
0
3
0
4
1960/61
Phenol,
2800
dustrie
Ammonium,
Nitrit, Sulfat
Teerag-
M34, x=
PAK,
11.
Teerverarbeit
6
Austria
Wien
Wien
Asdag-
W21
5338000, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
1926-1981
Phenole,
170701
130.000
5,0
58
ind.site
0
2
0
4
Simmering
ung
Simmering
8600
BTX
refinery
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Mineralöl-
Mineralöl,
7
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg Tuttendorfer
N16
5355250, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
0050
seit 1882
180.000
4,5
58
ind.site
0
3
0
4
h
Raffinerie
CKW
Breite
250
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Shipyard
Metalle,
8
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg
N33
5356050, y= -
3
Danube
industrial site
Schiffbau
0420
1920-1960
200.000
4,0
57
ind.site
3
3
513
2
h
Korneuburg
Mineralöl
1100
Central
Transdanubian
X=642 735
industrial
industrial
190200
9
Hungary
Environmental
Dunaújváros Dunaferr Inc.
#WERT!
Y=174 625
2
Danube
sewage
1.500.000
1.500.000
5
57
0
3
0
4
deposit
190804
Iinspectorates
sludge
Area
municipal
waste,
accompanied
Stadt
Stadt
Deponie
R: 4543249
1946 until
by
10
Germany
2
200
Danube
old deposit
1.450.000
3,5
46
3
1
m1 < 47
n.d.
Straubing
Straubing
Peterswöhrd
H: 5417000
1977
construction
(m1 < 47)
waste and
industrial
waste
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
refinery
Mineralöl-
Mineralöl,
11
Austria
Mödling
Vösendorf
N20
5331650, y= -
1
Petersbach industrial site
0670
1845-1994
145.000
4,5
57
ind.site
0
3
0
4
h
Vösendorf
Raffinerie
PAK
1200
Leather
M31, x=
Lederverarbe
12
Austria
Kärnten
Klagenfurt
Klagenfurt
factory
K22
5166094, y=
1
Glan
industrial site
2070
1930-1990
Chrom
120.000
4,5
57
ind.site
0
3
0
4
itung
Neuner
75848
slags from
primary and
secondary
melting,
(other not
specified
100501,
Tamava
inorganic
060199,
46_06_35_N
50
industrial
13
Romania
Sibiu
Copsa Mica
#WERT!
0
Mare River
wastes other
100504,
1.350.000
5
57
1
2
114
3
24_14_27_E
2
waste
Visa Brook
inorganic
170405,
matters from
170701
thermic
processes as
suspensions
or dust, iron
and steel)
not
processed
slag, lining
and
refractory
waste
materials,
100202
furnace slag,
100206
foundry
100903
slag and ash
shapes
14
Romania
Hunedoara
Calan
#WERT!
0
3500
Strei River
101003
1.300.000
5
57
1
3
171
3
pond
containing
050603
organic
100901
ligands,
101001
wastes from
mixture
preparation
previously
thermic
processing,
other tars
not
processed
slag, lining
and
refractory
waste
materials,
100202,
furnace slag,
100206,
foundry
100903,
45_43_54_N
slag and ash
shapes
15
Romania
Hunedoara
Calan
15
0
3500
Strei River
deposit
101003,
1300000
5
57
1
3
171
3
22_59_35_E
pond
containing
050603,
organic
100901,
ligands,wast
101001
es from
mixture
preparation
previously
thermic
processing,
other tars
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity in
Risk value
relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
m1-value
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
m³
r0
for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
CKW,
Trichlorethen
Donau
M31, x=
Chemische
,
Sankt Veit an
16
Austria
Kärnten
Brückl
Chemie
K5
5177850, y=
2
Gurk
industrial site Grundstoffin
0050
seit 1909
Tetrachloreth
50.000
5,0
56
ind.site
1
2
112
3
der Glan
Brückl
91450
dustrie
en,
Hexachlorbut
adien
red-sludge
ZSNP, Ziar
Hron 125,3
bed, danger
alkaline
17
Slovakia
4
Hron
since 1957
200115
1000000
5
55
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
n./Hronom
r.km
waste
water
deposit
deposit of
deposit of
Malina 6,0
danger
18
Slovakia
A.S.A. Zohor
3
Morava
mixed
since 1996
130000
350000
5
55
3
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
r.km
waste, oil
danger waste
waste
The Odessa
area Izmail
Storehouse
no data for FP and
19
Ukraine
Cellulose
200.000
5
55
no data
no data
n.d.
CaCl + Na2O
SM
cardboard
combine
The Odessa
area Izmail
cleaning
no data for FP and
20
Ukraine
Cellulose
23300 per day
4
53
no data
no data
n.d.
contructions
SM
cardboard
combine
M31, x=
Metalle,
Sankt Veit an
Landfill
21
Austria
Kärnten
Althofen
K7
5192050, y=
1
Gurk
deposit
0840
Industriemüll
seit 1922
Mineralisieru
500.000
5,0
55
0
2
0
4
der Glan
Roßwiese
85950
ng
CKW
Industrieabfäl
(Tetrachloret
M31, x=
le,
hen,
Sankt Veit an
lime dump
22
Austria
Kärnten
Brückl
K20
5178385, y=
1
Gurk
deposit
0420
Bauschutt,
seit 1930
Trichlorethen
250.000
4,5
51
0
3
0
4
der Glan
site Brückl I/II
91658
Aushubmater
,
ial
Hexachlorbut
adien)
Hausmüll,
erhöhte
M31, x=
Bauschutt,
Mineralisieru
23
Austria
Tirol
Schwaz
Pill, Weer
Landfill Pill
T7
5243100, y=
1
Inn
deposit
2070
Industrie-
ng,
1.000.000
4,0
50
0
3
0
4
10100
/Gewerbemül
reduzierende
l
Verhältnisse
Hausmüll,
reduzierende
M34, x=
Bauschutt,
Verhältnisse,
Niederöstereic
24
Austria
Tulln
Tulln
Landfill Tulln
N49
5356960, y= -
3
Danube
deposit
2070
Industrie-
seit 1934
erhöhte
200.000
3,5
42
3
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
h
20420
/Gewerbemül
Mineralisieru
(m1 < 47)
l
ng
Central
Transdanubian
Bakonyi
industrial
25
Hungary
Environmental
Ajka
1
0
Torna
gray sludge
190101
15.000.000
15.000.000
4
53
0
1
0
4
Erm Inc.
deposit
Iinspectorates
Area
46_33_12_n
slag and ash
26
Romania
Bacau
Letea Veche
2
0
1,5
Siret River
fuel burning
100100
13.150.000
4
53
3
2
318
2
26_56_51_E
pond
Middle Danube
Environmental
Fixon Bt.-
old industrial Old mining
slag and dust
190101
27
Hungary
Lrinci
3
0
Zagyva
5.000.000
4
53
0
3
0
4
Inspectorates
Humiron Ltd.
site
tailing
ash
190103
area
deposit of
liqued
BUCINA,
Zolna 1,5
industrial
28
Slovakia
4
Hron
waste,fenole,
since 1950
190106
20000
5
51
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
Horny Sturec
r.km
liquid waste
formaldehyd
e
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Tankfarm
Mineralöllage
29
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg
N46
5328350, y= -
3
Danube
industrial site
0010
1900-1975
Mineralöl
10.000
4,0
51
ind.site
3
2
306
2
h
Mare
r
1250
AES borsodi
North
Energetikai
Hungarian
sludgewater
Ltd
x=800 150
old mining
800.000 and
30
Hungary
Environmental
Tiszaújváros
1
2
Tisa (483)
and slag-
100100
1.400.000
4
50
0
2
0
4
Tiszapalkony
y=286 711
tailing
1.400.000
Inspectorate
dust-ash
Area
ai Herm
Béghin-Say
Cukorgyár
Middle Tisa
Inc.(technolo
X=734 750
contaminate
Environmental
industrial
waste water
waste water
31
Hungary
Szolnok
gy waste-
2
Y=200 250
2
Tisa (330)
d surface
1.300.000
4
50
1
1
50
3
Inspectorates
deposit
sludgein lake
sludge
water
water
Area
thickerer)
not specified
Tumu
43_43_50_N
pyrite ash
(wastes
32
Romania
Teleorman
1
0
150
Danube
060400
1.900.000
4
50
1
2
100
3
Magurele
24_52_05_E
pond
containing
metals)
slags from
primary and
secondary
melting, other
not specified
100501,
Tarnava
inorganic
060199,
Mare
industrial
wastes, other
33
Romania
Sibiu
Copsa Mica
18
0
50; 2
deposit
100504,
1350000
4
50
1
2
100
3
River;Visa
wastes
inorganic
170405,
brook
matters from
thermic
170701
processes as
susspenssions
or dust,iron
and steel)
CHEMKO,
Ondava 16,2
deposit -
leach out
34
Slovakia
3
Bodrog
since 1955
190202
800000
4
49
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
Strazske
rkm
industrial
during flood
35
Slovakia
DUSLO, Sala
3
Vah 54 r.km
Vah
DUSLO Sala
sludge bed
since 1980
190804
750000
4
49
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
sludge
CHEMKO,
Ondava 43,2
deposit -
leach out
36
Slovakia
3
Bodrog
since 1959
190202
600000
4
49
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
Strazske
rkm
sludge
during flood
reservoir
Slag and
slag and ash
37
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
1
0
3000
Danube
ashes from
100100
655.000
4
49
1
2
98
3
pond
coal burning
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity in
Risk value
relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
m1-value
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
m³
r0
for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
Forrós-
Middle Tisa
BERVA Inc.(
X=744 160
belwatercana
contaminate
Environmental
chemical
industrial
polluted
10.500 and
38
Hungary
Heves
#WERT!
Y=251 350
0
l (8) Hanyi-ér
hydrocarbon
d soil and
5
51
0
3
0
4
Inspectorates
pollution )
deposit
earth
5.000
(16) Tisa
groundwater
Area
(388)
not specified
(wastes from
ferrous
pieces
Ialomita
slag and ash
39
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
23
0
200
deposit
foundry,
100900
12000
5
51
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
River
pond
some of
them might
be
dangerous)
deposit of
liqued
Bucina,
Zolna 1,5
industrial
40
Slovakia
waste,fenole,
190106
20.000
5
51
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
Horny Sturec
r.km
deposit
formaldehyd
e
Sludge
lagoons in
Czech
Desna river
industrial
the waste
m³ too small, no
41
Sumperk
0
heavy metals
sludge
6.000
5
49
0
no data
n.d.
Republic
(river km 6)
deposit
water
(m³ too
data for SM
treatment
small)
plant
deposit of
PETROCHE
Hron 208
gudrons
overspill by
42
Slovakia
4
Hron
since 1964
190202
120000
4
47
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
MA, Predajna
r.km
PETROCHE
heavy raining
MA
ENO,
ENO
Nitra 128
deposit of fly-
43
Slovakia
Zemianske
3
Nitra
Zemianske
since 1965
190103
300000
4
47
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
r.km
ash
Kostolany
Kostolany
KOVOHUTY,
Hornad
sludge
leach out
44
Slovakia
3
Hornad
since 1967
190202
285000
4
47
10
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
Krompachy
186,0 rkm
deposit
during flood
sludge
BUKOCEL,
Ondava 48,7
deposit -
leach out
45
Slovakia
Vranov
3
Bodrog
since 1983
190202
153000
4
47
1
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
rkm
links bank
during flood
n.Toplou
meander
R: 4390858
1960 until
municipal
46
Germany
Dillingen
Dillingen
Hühnerwörth
2
200
Danube
old deposit
470.000
4,0
47
3
1
141
3
H: 5382545
1977
waste
Central
Transdanubian
X=642 735
Dunapack
Danube
industrial
47
Hungary
Environmental
Dunaújváros
1
Y=174 625
2
mix sludge
190100
212.000
212.000
4
47
0
3
0
4
Inc.
(1573)
deposit
Iinspectorates
Area
North
Tisa
Hungarian
Chemical
x=798 042
industry
industrial
48
Hungary
Environmental
Tiszaújváros
Self-
2
Y=287 515
2
Tisa (484)
sewage
190100
211.000
4
47
0
2
0
4
deposit
Inspectorate
contained
earth dam
Area
plant
deposit of
Skladka
Semetes /in
common and
leaking tube
49
Slovakia
TKO,
2
Vah
1968-2000
190202
105000
4
47
3
no data
no data for SM
4
tube/
industrial
line
Turzovka
waste
Wastes from
43_59_20_N
industrial
50
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
0
250
Danube
sugar beet
020400
435.000
4
47
1
3
141
3
22_56_30_E
waste
processing
Hór Brook (2)
North
Mezkövesd
Kánya Brook
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
,,B" area
x=768 200
Mezkövesd
(14) Rima
old military
polluted soil
300.000 and
51
Hungary
Environmental
Old Fuel
1
Y=274 000
0
?
4
47
0
3
0
4
Airport
Brook (8)
site
and
60.000
Inspectorate
depot
Area
Tisa (434)
groundwater
heavy metal
Middle Danube
Abandon
and
Budapest,
Environmental
sewage
hydrocarbon
52
Hungary
Csepel-
2
0
Danube
deposit
060405
300.000
300.000
4
47
1
3
141
3
Inspectorates
sludge
(CH) polluted
island Nord
area
depots
organic
compounds
not specified
(waste
solutions and
hazardous
muds
m³ too
53
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
3
0
1500
Ilfov Brook
110103
3.028
5
47
0
no data
m³ too small
waste
containing
(m³ too
small
chromium
small)
but without
cyanides
organic
solvents,
industrial
washing
m³ too
54
Romania
Giurgiu
Giurgiu
3
0
3000
Danube
deposit
070104
3000
5
47
0
no data
m³ too small
wastes
liquids and
(m³ too
small
mother
small)
solutions
deposit of
danger
Malina 6,0
industrial
premixed
55
Slovakia
A.S.A. Zohor
190202
350.000
cca 350000
4
47
3
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
waste, oil
r.km
deposit
waste
waste
deposit of
gudrons
Hron 208
industrial
overspill by
56
Slovakia
Predajna
050100
120.000
4
47
0
no data
no data for SM
n.d.
PETROCHE
r.km
deposit
heavy raining
MA
Industrial
M31, x=
deposit
Industrieabfäl
Magnesium,
57
Austria
Kärnten
Villach Land
Ferndorf
K21
5177019, y=
1
Drau
deposit
1030
seit 1914
500.000
3,5
42
0
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
Heraklithwer
le
Sulfat
22827
(m1 < 47)
ke Ferndorf
NCHZ,
Nitra 123
NCHZ
deposit of
m1 < 47, no data
58
Slovakia
4
Nitra
since 1968
20402
12000000
3
45
0
no data
m1 < 47
Novaky
r.km
Novaky
calc-sludge
(m1 < 47)
for SM
Upper Danube
X=592 500
VII.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
m1 < 47, no data
59
Hungary
1
Y=265 000
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
3.250.000
3
45
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
03/29,30,31
tailing
for FP and SM
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
not specified
m³ too small,
(muds from
hazardous
m1 < 47, no
m³ too
60
Romania
Dambovita
Gaesti
6
0
1100
Arges River
deposit
industrial
190804
30.6
5
45
no data
no data
wastes
waste water
(m1 < 47)
data for FP and
small
treatment)
SM
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity in
Risk value
relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
m1-value
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
m³
r0
for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
not specified
(waste
solutions and
cyanuric
muds
(alkalines)
with heavy
m³ too small,
metals
hazardous
110101,
m1 < 47, no
m³ too
61
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
4
0
not specified
deposit
others than
10.5
5
45
no data
no data
wastes
110103
chromium,
(m1 < 47)
data for FP and
small
wastes
SM
solutions and
muds
containing
chromium
but without
cyanides)
Central
Torna (52)
Transdanubian
MAL Inc. I-
m1 < 47, no
x=534 000
Marcal (97,8) industrial
red dross
62
Hungary
Environmental
Ajka
VIII. store,
5
0
010303
29.000.000
29.000.000
3
45
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
y=194 000
Rába (
deposit
settlements
Iinspectorates
reclaimed
(m1 < 47)
SM
Area
204,6)
45_53_47_N
slag and ash
63
Romania
Hunedoara
Mintia
13
0
500
Mures River
deposit
fireplace ash
100101
9700000
3
45
1
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
22_53_28_E
pond
(m1 < 47)
Wastes from
47_15_10_N
industrial
64
Romania
Iasi
Blagesti
14
0
500
Siret River
sugar
020400
100.000
4
45
1
2
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
26_45_32_E
waste
processing
(m1 < 47)
not specified
(waste
solutions and
m³ too small,
Lalomita
hazardous
muds
m1 < 47, no
m³ too
65
Romania
Dambovita
Fieni
15
0
180
110103
20
5
45
no data
no data
River
waste
containing
(m1 < 47)
data for FP and
small
chromium
SM
but without
cyanides
not specified
( waste
solutions and
cyanuric
muds
(alkalines)
with heavy
m³ too small,
metals other
hazardous
110101
m1 < 47, no
m³ too
66
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
0
not specified
than
11
5
45
no data
no data
waste
110103
chromium,
(m1 < 47)
data for FP and
small
waste
SM
solutions and
muds
containing
chromium
but without
cyanides)
not specified
(waste
solutions and
cyanuric
m³ too small,
hazardous
muds
m1 < 47, no
m³ too
67
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
0
800
Ilfov Brook
110101
6
5
45
no data
no data
waste
(alkalines)
(m1 < 47)
data for FP and
small
with heavy
SM
metals
others than
chromium)
not specified
(waste
solutions and
cyanuric
m³ too small,
hazardous
muds
m1 < 47, no
m³ too
68
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
1
0
800
Ilfov brook
deposit
110101
6
5
45
no data
no data
wastes
(alkalines)
(m1 < 47)
data for FP and
small
with heavy
SM
metals
others than
chromium)
m1 < 47, no
industrial
wood
69
Romania
Bacau
Bacau
17
0
3000
Bistrita River
deposit
not specified
40000
4
43
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
wastes
processing
(m1 < 47)
SM
the forest
village of
m1 < 47, no
"Zatova", str/
industrial
70
Ukraine
town type
0
600
Uzh
wastes
Solid wastes
1.48.21
30.000
4
43
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Budivelnikov,
deposit
Perechin
(m1 < 47)
1
SM
PETROCHE
deposit of
Hron 206
industrial
washed up
m1 < 47, no
71
Slovakia
050100
50.000
4
43
0
no data
m1 < 47
MA area
gudrons
r.km
deposit
during flood
(m1 < 47)
data SM
Upper Danube
VI.
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
72
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
1.800.000
3
42
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
06/8
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
SM
Üll-Laposi
(7) Német-éri
Middle Tisa
(13)
X=781 755
Old Soviet
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Military
Hortobágy-
old military
polluted
contaminate
73
Hungary
Kunmadaras
#WERT!
Y=232 001
0
Military
hydrocarbon
14.500
?
4
41
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Airport
Berettyó (82)
site
earth
d soil
Airport
(m1 < 47)
Area
Hármas-
SM
Körös (61)
Tisa (243)
hydrocarbon
Middle Danube
Former
m³ too small,
(CH)
Environmental
Kiskunlacház
old military
Soviet
m1 < 47, no
74
Hungary
#WERT!
0
Danube
aviation
9.000
?
4
41
(m1 < 47)
no data
no data
m³ too small
Inspectorates
a
site
military
kerosine
volume too
data for FP and
area
airport
pollution
small
SM
Upper Danube
X= 600 871
VIII.
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Neszmély
Old mining
75
Hungary
#WERT!
Y=264 058
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
5.000.000
3
40
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
0125
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
SM
Upper Danube
III.
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Almásfüzit
x=590 300
Old mining
76
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
1.000.000
3
40
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
118
y=265 600
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
SM
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity in
Risk value
relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
m1-value
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
m³
r0
for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
Upper Danube
V.
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
77
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
800.000
3
40
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
06/10
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
SM
Upper Danube
IV.
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
78
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
600.000
3
40
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
06/12
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
SM
TVM Inc.
Middle Tisa
(waste of
X=732 950
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
industrial
polluted
contaminate
79
Hungary
Szolnok
chemical
#WERT!
Y=199 716
2
Tisa (332)
200202
600.000
3
40
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
deposit
earth
d soil
industry)
(m1 < 47)
Area
SM
Körös
Establishme
communal
reclaimed
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
X=806 600
80
Hungary
Békéscsaba
n organic
#WERT!
0
Nádas canal
waste
waste
780.000
3
40
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Y=148 550
waste
storage
storage
(m1 < 47)
Area
SM
Middle Danube
Budapest,
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Metallochemi
Danube
old industrial Old mining
Pb, Zn, Cu,
81
Hungary
XXII.
#WERT!
0
metalslag
010400
650.000
650.000
3
40
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
a
(1479,4)
site
tailing
Cd
Harangozó u.
(m1 < 47)
area
SM
m1 < 47, no
DROTOVNE,
Drotovna
Fe- sludge
82
Slovakia
3
Vah 97 r.km
Vah
since 1962
190102
160000
3
37
0
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Hlohovec
Hlohovec
bed
(m1 < 47)
SM
Upper Danube
I-II
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Almásfüzit
x=590 327
Danube 1749-
Old mining
83
Hungary
1
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
450.000
3
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
119/11 Hrsz
y=265 665
1761 km
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
SM
closed
deposit of
TKO,
deposit of
common and
m1 < 47, no
84
Slovakia
Kysucke
2
Kysuca
Vah
fouling
1960-1998
190601
150000
3
37
0
no data
m1 < 47
industrial
Nove Mesto
industrial
(m1 < 47)
data for SM
waste
sludge
North
MH
Tarna (49)
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
x=736 250
m1 < 47, no
Tarnaszentm
Zagyva (58) old military
polluted soil
69.000 and
85
Hungary
Environmental
Tarnaszentm
1
Y=281 850
0
?
4
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
ária Fuel
Tisa (335
site
and
69.000
Inspectorate
ária
(m1 < 47)
SM
Area
depot
groundwater
North
MH
Kánya Brook
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
Mezkövesd
(14) Rima
m1 < 47, no
Mezkövesd
x=762 425
old military
polluted soil
52.500 and
86
Hungary
Environmental
Fuel depot
2
0
Brook (8)
?
4
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Hrsz: 0456/2
Y=272 900
site
and
67.500
Inspectorate
,,K" area
Tisa (434)
(m1 < 47)
SM
Area
groundwater
Middle Danube
hydrocarbon
Former
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
old military
(CH) polluted
308000 and
87
Hungary
Tököl
3
0
Danube
military
?
3
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
site
soil and
209.900
airport
(m1 < 47)
area
groundwater
SM
not specified
44_59_15_N
Lalomita
slag and ash
88
Romania
Dambovita
Doicesti
4
0
50
(fireplace
100101
500.000
3
37
1
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
25_24_02_E
River
pond
ash)
(m1 < 47)
Old Danube-
89
Romania
Tulcea
Turcoaia
20
0
5000
deposit
sterile pond
not specified not specified
440000
3
37
3
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
Macin Arm
(m1 < 47)
industrial
Wastes from
90
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
11
0
250
Danube
deposit
sugar beet
435000
3
37
1
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
wastes
processing
(m1 < 47)
South
Transdanubian
X=622 150
Communal
Communal
m1 < 47, no
Danube
settlement
91
Hungary
Environmental
Mohács
12
Y= 74 880
0
organic
organic
200301
370.000
3
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
(1445)
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
SM
Area
South
Transdanubian
X=529 650
Communal
Communal
m1 < 47, no
settlement
92
Hungary
Environmental
Barcs
13
Y= 70 890
0
Drava (153)
organic
organic
300.000
3
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
SM
Area
Körös
Establishme
communal
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
X=818 000
93
Hungary
Gyula
n organic
14
0
White Körös
waste
200301
273.773
273.773
3
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Y=146 100
waste
storage
(m1 < 47)
Area
SM
ELEKTROLU
X - LEHEL
Middle Tisa
Ltd WDS-1
X=711 216
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Zagyva (67)
industrial
polluted
contaminate
94
Hungary
Jászberény
(waste of
15
Y=237 746
0
200202 155.000
3
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Tisa (336)
deposit
earth
d soil
chemical
(m1 < 47)
Area
SM
industry )
South
Transdanubian
X=585 860
Communal
Communal
m1 < 47, no
settlement
95
Hungary
Environmental
Harkány
16
Y= 56 330
0
Drava (72)
organic
organic
114.000
3
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
SM
Area
South
Transdanubian
X=590 640
Communal
Communal
m1 < 47, no
settlement
96
Hungary
Environmental
Siklós
16
Y= 53 770
0
Drava (65)
organic
organic
112.000
3
37
no data
no data
data for FP and m1 < 47
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
SM
Area
Rompetrol in
Danube,
industrial
oil sludge
industrial
97
Romania
Navodari
Constanta
130.000
55
3
2
330
2
Navodari
black sea
deposit
pond
deposit
Appendix 1, Table (c): Reported deposit sites, Slovakia (18 records) (30.07.2006):
n.d. ... not determinable
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor m2-value / classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
or
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures comment
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
s
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
in kg
red-sludge
ZSNP, Ziar
Hron 125,3
no data for
17
Slovakia
4
Hron
bed, danger
alkaline water since 1957
200115
1000000
5
55
0
no data
n.d.
n./Hronom
r.km
SM
waste deposit
1
deposit of
deposit of
Malina 6,0
danger
no data for
18
Slovakia
A.S.A. Zohor
3
Morava
mixed danger since 1996
130000
350000
5
55
3
no data
n.d.
r.km
waste, oil
SM
waste
2
waste
deposit of
BUCINA,
Zolna 1,5
liqued
industrial
no data for
28
Slovakia
4
Hron
since 1950
190106
20000
5
51
0
no data
n.d.
Horny Sturec
r.km
waste,fenole,
liquid waste
SM
formaldehyde
3
CHEMKO,
Ondava 16,2
deposit -
leach out
no data for
34
Slovakia
3
Bodrog
since 1955
190202
800000
4
49
0
no data
n.d.
4
Strazske
rkm
industrial
during flood
SM
no data for
35
Slovakia
DUSLO, Sala
3
Vah 54 r.km
Vah
DUSLO Sala
sludge bed
since 1980
190804
750000
4
49
0
no data
n.d.
5
SM
sludge
CHEMKO,
Ondava 43,2
deposit -
leach out
no data for
36
Slovakia
3
Bodrog
since 1959
190202
600000
4
49
0
no data
n.d.
Strazske
rkm
sludge
during flood
SM
6
reservoir
deposit of
Bucina,
liqued
Zolna 1,5
industrial
no data for
40
Slovakia
190106
20.000
5
51
0
no data
n.d.
Horny Sturec waste,fenole,
r.km
deposit
SM
formaldehyde
7
deposit of
PETROCHE
Hron 208
gudrons
overspill by
no data for
42
Slovakia
4
Hron
since 1964
190202
120000
4
47
0
no data
n.d.
MA, Predajna
r.km
PETROCHE
heavy raining
SM
8
MA
ENO,
ENO
Nitra 128
deposit of fly-
no data for
43
Slovakia
Zemianske
3
Nitra
Zemianske
since 1965
190103
300000
4
47
0
no data
n.d.
r.km
ash
SM
9
Kostolany
Kostolany
KOVOHUTY,
Hornad 186,0
sludge
leach out
no data for
44
Slovakia
3
Hornad
since 1967
190202
285000
4
47
10
no data
n.d.
Krompachy
rkm
deposit
during flood
SM
10
sludge
BUKOCEL,
Ondava 48,7
deposit -
leach out
no data for
45
Slovakia
Vranov
3
Bodrog
since 1983
190202
153000
4
47
1
no data
n.d.
rkm
links bank
during flood
SM
n.Toplou
11
meander
deposit of
Skladka
Semetes /in
common and
leaking tube
no data for
49
Slovakia
TKO,
2
Vah
1968-2000
190202
105000
4
47
3
no data
4
tube/
industrial
line
SM
Turzovka
waste
12
deposit of
danger
Malina 6,0
industrial
premixed
no data for
55
Slovakia
A.S.A. Zohor
190202
350.000
cca 350000
4
47
3
no data
n.d.
waste, oil
r.km
deposit
waste
SM
13
waste
deposit of
gudrons
Hron 208
industrial
overspill by
no data for
56
Slovakia
Predajna
050100
120.000
4
47
0
no data
n.d.
PETROCHE
r.km
deposit
heavy raining
SM
14
MA
NCHZ,
Nitra 123
NCHZ
deposit of
m1 < 47, no
58
Slovakia
4
Nitra
since 1968
20402
12000000
3
45
0
no data
m1 < 47
15
Novaky
r.km
Novaky
calc-sludge
(m1 < 47)
data for SM
m1 < 47,
PETROCHE
deposit of
Hron 206
industrial
washed up
71
Slovakia
050100
50.000
4
43
0
no data
no data
m1 < 47
MA area
gudrons
r.km
deposit
during flood
(m1 < 47)
16
SM
m1 < 47,
DROTOVNE
Drotovna
Fe- sludge
no data for
82
Slovakia
3
Vah 97 r.km
Vah
since 1962
190102
160000
3
37
0
no data
m1 < 47
, Hlohovec
Hlohovec
bed
(m1 < 47)
FP and
17
SM
closed
deposit of
TKO,
deposit of
m1 < 47,
common and
84
Slovakia
Kysucke
2
Kysuca
Vah
fouling
1960-1998
190601
150000
3
37
0
no data
no data for m1 < 47
industrial
Nove Mesto
industrial
(m1 < 47)
SM
18
waste
sludge
Appendix 1, Table (d): Reported deposit sites, Hungary (32 records) (30.07.2006):
n.d. ... not determinable
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor m2-value / classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
or
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures comment
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
s
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
in kg
Central
Transdanubia
X=642 735
industrial
n
industrial
190200
9
Hungary
Dunaújváros Dunaferr Inc.
#WERT!
Y=174 625
2
Danube
sewage
1.500.000
1.500.000
5
57
0
3
0
4
Environmental
deposit
190804
Iinspectorates
sludge
Area
1
Central
Transdanubia
n
Bakonyi
industrial
25
Hungary
Ajka
1
0
Torna
gray sludge
190101
15.000.000
15.000.000
4
53
0
1
0
4
Environmental
Erm Inc.
deposit
Iinspectorates
Area
2
Middle
Danube
Fixon Bt.-
old industrial Old mining
slag and dust
190101
27
Hungary
Environmental
Lrinci
3
0
Zagyva
5.000.000
4
53
0
3
0
4
Humiron Ltd.
site
tailing
ash
190103
Inspectorates
area
3
AES borsodi
North
Energetikai
Hungarian
sludgewater
Ltd
x=800 150
old mining
800.000 and
30
Hungary
Environmental
Tiszaújváros
1
2
Tisa (483)
and slag-dust
100100
1.400.000
4
50
0
2
0
4
Tiszapalkony
y=286 711
tailing
1.400.000
Inspectorate
ash
Area
ai Herm
4
Béghin-Say
Cukorgyár
Middle Tisa
Inc.(technolo
X=734 750
Environmental
industrial
waste water
waste water
contaminated
31
Hungary
Szolnok
gy waste-
2
Y=200 250
2
Tisa (330)
1.300.000
4
50
1
1
50
3
Inspectorates
deposit
sludgein lake
sludge
surface water
Area
water
thickerer)
5
Forrós-
Middle Tisa
BERVA Inc.(
X=744 160
belwatercana
contaminated
Environmental
chemical
industrial
10.500 and
38
Hungary
Heves
#WERT!
Y=251 350
0
(8) Hanyi-ér
polluted earth
hydrocarbon
soil and
5
51
0
3
0
4
Inspectorates
pollution )
deposit
5.000
Area
(16) Tisa
groundwater
6
(388)
Central
Transdanubia
X=642 735
n
Dunapack
Danube
industrial
47
Hungary
Dunaújváros
1
Y=174 625
2
mix sludge
190100
212.000
212.000
4
47
0
3
0
4
Environmental
Inc.
(1573)
deposit
Iinspectorates
Area
7
North
Tisa
Hungarian
Chemical
x=798 042
industry
industrial
48
Hungary
Environmental
Tiszaújváros
Self-
2
Y=287 515
2
Tisa (484)
sewage
190100
211.000
4
47
0
2
0
4
deposit
Inspectorate
contained
earth dam
Area
8
plant
Hór Brook (2)
North
Mezkövesd
Kánya Brook
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
,,B" area
x=768 200
Mezkövesd
(14) Rima
old military
polluted soil
300.000 and
51
Hungary
Environmental
Old Fuel
1
Y=274 000
0
?
4
47
0
3
0
4
Airport
Brook (8)
site
and
60.000
Inspectorate
depot
Area
Tisa (434)
groundwater
9
heavy metal
Middle
Abandon
and
Danube
Budapest,
sewage
hydrocarbon
52
Hungary
Environmental
Csepel-island
2
0
Danube
deposit
060405
300.000
300.000
4
47
1
3
141
3
sludge
(CH) polluted
Inspectorates
Nord
area
depots
organic
compounds
10
Upper Danube
X=592 500
VII.
m1 < 47, no
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
59
Hungary
1
Y=265 000
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
3.250.000
3
45
no data
no data
data for FP
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
03/29,30,31
tailing
(m1 < 47)
area
red-dross
and SM
11
Central
Transdanubia
Torna (52)
m1 < 47,
MAL Inc. I-
n
x=534 000
Marcal (97,8) industrial
red dross
no data for
62
Hungary
Ajka
VIII. store,
5
0
010303
29.000.000
29.000.000
3
45
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Environmental
y=194 000
Rába (
deposit
settlements
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Iinspectorates
reclaimed
204,6)
SM
Area
12
Upper Danube
m1 < 47,
VI.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
no data for
72
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
1.800.000
3
42
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
06/8
tailing
(m1 < 47)
FP and
area
red-dross
SM
13
Üll-Laposi
(7) Német-éri
Middle Tisa
(13)
m1 < 47,
X=781 755
Old Soviet
Environmental
Military
Hortobágy-
old military
contaminated
no data for
73
Hungary
Kunmadaras
#WERT!
Y=232 001
0
Military
polluted earth
hydrocarbon
14.500
?
4
41
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Airport
Berettyó (82)
site
soil
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Area
Airport
Hármas-
SM
Körös (61)
14
Tisa (243)
m³ too
Middle
Former
hydrocarbon
small, m1
Danube
Kiskunlacház
old military
Soviet
(CH) aviation
< 47, no
74
Hungary
Environmental
#WERT!
0
Danube
9.000
?
4
41
(m1 < 47)
no data
no data
m³ too small
a
site
military
kerosine
Inspectorates
volume too
data for
area
airport
pollution
small
FP and
15
SM
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
in kg
Upper Danube
m1 < 47,
X= 600 871
VIII.
Environmental
Neszmély
Old mining
no data for
75
Hungary
#WERT!
Y=264 058
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
5.000.000
3
40
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
0125
tailing
(m1 < 47)
FP and
area
red-dross
SM
16
Upper Danube
m1 < 47,
III.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
x=590 300
Old mining
no data for
76
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
1.000.000
3
40
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
118
y=265 600
tailing
(m1 < 47)
FP and
area
red-dross
SM
17
Upper Danube
m1 < 47,
V.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
no data for
77
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
800.000
3
40
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
06/10
tailing
(m1 < 47)
FP and
area
red-dross
SM
18
Upper Danube
m1 < 47,
IV.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
no data for
78
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
600.000
3
40
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
06/12
tailing
(m1 < 47)
FP and
area
red-dross
SM
19
TVM Inc.
Middle Tisa
m1 < 47,
(waste of
X=732 950
Environmental
industrial
contaminated
no data for
79
Hungary
Szolnok
chemical
#WERT!
Y=199 716
2
Tisa (332)
polluted earth
200202
600.000
3
40
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
deposit
soil
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Area
industry)
20
SM
Körös
m1 < 47,
Establishmen
communal
reclaimed
Environmental
X=806 600
no data for
80
Hungary
Békéscsaba
organic
#WERT!
0
Nádas canal
waste
waste
780.000
3
40
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Y=148 550
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Area
waste
storage
storage
21
SM
Middle
m1 < 47,
Danube
Budapest, Metallochemi
Danube
old industrial Old mining
Pb, Zn, Cu,
no data for
81
Hungary
Environmental
XXII.
#WERT!
0
metalslag
010400
650.000
650.000
3
40
no data
no data
m1 < 47
a
(1479,4)
site
tailing
Cd
Inspectorates
FP and
Harangozó u.
(m1 < 47)
area
SM
22
Upper Danube
m1 < 47,
I-II
Environmental
Almásfüzit
x=590 327
Danube 1749
Old mining
no data for
83
Hungary
1
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
450.000
3
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
119/11 Hrsz
y=265 665
1761 km
tailing
(m1 < 47)
FP and
area
red-dross
SM
23
North
MH
Tarna (49)
hydrocarbon
m1 < 47,
Hungarian
x=736 250
Tarnaszentm
Zagyva (58) old military
polluted soil
69.000 and
no data for
85
Hungary
Environmental
Tarnaszentm
1
Y=281 850
0
?
4
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
ária Fuel
Tisa (335
site
and
69.000
Inspectorate
FP and
ária
(m1 < 47)
Area
depot
groundwater
SM
24
North
MH
Kánya Brook
hydrocarbon
m1 < 47,
Hungarian
Mezkövesd
(14) Rima
Mezkövesd
x=762 425
old military
polluted soil
52.500 and
no data for
86
Hungary
Environmental
Fuel depot
2
0
Brook (8)
?
4
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Hrsz: 0456/2
Y=272 900
site
and
67.500
Inspectorate
FP and
,,K" area
Tisa (434)
(m1 < 47)
Area
groundwater
SM
25
Middle
hydrocarbon
m1 < 47,
Danube
Former
old military
(CH) polluted
308000 and
no data for
87
Hungary
Environmental
Tököl
3
0
Danube
military
?
3
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
site
soil and
209.900
Inspectorates
FP and
airport
(m1 < 47)
area
groundwater
SM
26
South
Transdanubia
m1 < 47,
X=622 150
n
Danube
Communal
settlement
Communal
no data for
91
Hungary
Mohács
12
Y= 74 880
0
200301
370.000
3
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Environmental
(1445)
organic dump
waste
organic dump
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Inspectorates
SM
Area
27
South
Transdanubia
m1 < 47,
X=529 650
n
Communal
settlement
Communal
no data for
92
Hungary
Barcs
13
Y= 70 890
0
Drava (153)
300.000
3
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Environmental
organic dump
waste
organic dump
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Inspectorates
SM
Area
28
Körös
m1 < 47,
Establishmen
communal
Environmental
X=818 000
no data for
93
Hungary
Gyula
organic
14
0
White Körös
waste
200301
273.773
273.773
3
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Y=146 100
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Area
waste
storage
29
SM
ELEKTROL
UX - LEHEL
Middle Tisa
m1 < 47,
Ltd WDS-1
X=711 216
Environmental
Zagyva (67)
industrial
contaminated
no data for
94
Hungary
Jászberény
(waste of
15
Y=237 746
0
polluted earth
200202 155.000
3
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Inspectorates
Tisa (336)
deposit
soil
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Area
chemical
industry )
SM
30
South
Transdanubia
m1 < 47,
X=585 860
n
Communal
settlement
Communal
no data for
95
Hungary
Harkány
16
Y= 56 330
0
Drava (72)
114.000
3
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Environmental
organic dump
waste
organic dump
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Inspectorates
SM
Area
31
South
Transdanubia
m1 < 47,
X=590 640
n
Communal
settlement
Communal
no data for
96
Hungary
Siklós
16
Y= 53 770
0
Drava (65)
112.000
3
37
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Environmental
organic dump
waste
organic dump
(m1 < 47)
FP and
Inspectorates
SM
32
Area
Appendix 1, Table (e): Reported deposit sites, Romania (25 records) (30.07.2006):
n.d. ... not determinable
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
m2-value /
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
or
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
comments
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
in kg
45_07_18_N
Old Danube-
waste not
no data for
1
Romania
Tulcea
Turcoaia
#WERT!
5000
sterile pond
not specified
not specified
440.000
3
3
n.d.
1
28_11_05_E
Macin Arm
specified
waste type
slags from primary
and secondary
melting, (other not
specified inorganic
100501,
Tamava Mare
wastes other
060199,
46_06_35_N
50
industrial
13
Romania
Sibiu
Copsa Mica
#WERT!
0
River
inorganic matters
100504,
1.350.000
5
57
1
2
114
3
24_14_27_E
2
waste
Visa Brook
from thermic
170405,
processes as
170701
suspensions or
dust, iron and
steel)
2
not processed
slag, lining and
refractory waste
materials, furnace
100202
slag, foundry
100206
shapes containing
100903
slag and ash
14
Romania
Hunedoara
Calan
#WERT!
0
3500
Strei River
organic ligands,
101003
1.300.000
5
57
1
3
171
3
pond
wastes from
050603
mixture
100901
preparation
101001
previously thermic
processing, other
tars
3
not processed
slag, lining and
refractory waste
materials, furnace
100202,
slag, foundry
100206,
shapes containing
100903,
45_43_54_N
slag and ash
15
Romania
Hunedoara
Calan
15
0
3500
Strei River
deposit
organic
101003,
1300000
5
57
1
3
171
3
22_59_35_E
pond
ligands,wastes
050603,
from mixture
100901,
preparation
101001
previously thermic
processing, other
tars
4
46_33_12_n
slag and ash
26
Romania
Bacau
Letea Veche
2
0
1,5
Siret River
fuel burning
100100
13.150.000
4
53
3
2
318
2
5
26_56_51_E
pond
not specified
Tumu
43_43_50_N
pyrite ash
32
Romania
Teleorman
1
0
150
Danube
(wastes containing
060400
1.900.000
4
50
1
2
100
3
Magurele
24_52_05_E
pond
metals)
6
slags from primary
and secondary
melting, other not
100501,
Tarnava
specified inorganic
060199,
Mare
industrial
wastes, other
33
Romania
Sibiu
Copsa Mica
18
0
50; 2
deposit
100504,
1350000
4
50
1
2
100
3
River;Visa
wastes
inorganic matters
170405,
brook
from thermic
processes as
170701
susspenssions or
dust,iron and steel)
7
slag and ash
Slag and ashes
37
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
1
0
3000
Danube
100100
655.000
4
49
1
2
98
3
8
pond
from coal burning
not specified
(wastes from
slag and ash
ferrous pieces
no data for
39
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
23
0
200
Ialomita River
deposit
100900
12000
5
51
0
no data
n.d.
pond
foundry, some of
SM
them might be
9
dangerous)
Wastes from
43_59_20_N
industrial
50
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
0
250
Danube
sugar beet
020400
435.000
4
47
1
3
141
3
10
22_56_30_E
waste
processing
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor
classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
ion
Nr.
Country
Region county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
m2-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
1,2,3.
quency
site
in kg
not specified
(waste solutions
hazardous
and muds
m³ too
m³ too
53
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
3
0
1500
Ilfov Brook
110103
3.028
5
47
(m³ too
0
no data
waste
containing
small
small
chromium but
small)
11
without cyanides
organic solvents,
industrial
washing liquids
m³ too
m³ too
54
Romania
Giurgiu
Giurgiu
3
0
3000
Danube
deposit
070104
3000
5
47
(m³ too
0
no data
wastes
and mother
small
small
12
solutions
small)
m³ too
not specified
small, m1
hazardous
(muds from
m³ too
60
Romania
Dambovita
Gaesti
6
0
1100
Arges River
deposit
190804
30.6
5
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
wastes
industrial waste
(m1 < 47)
small
water treatment)
data for FP
and SM
13
not specified
(waste solutions
and cyanuric
muds (alkalines)
m³ too
with heavy metals
small, m1
hazardous
110101,
m³ too
61
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
4
0
not specified
deposit
others than
10.5
5
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
wastes
110103
small
chromium, wastes
(m1 < 47)
data for FP
solutions and
and SM
muds containing
chromium but
without cyanides)
14
45_53_47_N
slag and ash
63
Romania
Hunedoara
Mintia
13
0
500
Mures River
deposit
fireplace ash
100101
9700000
3
45
1
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
15
22_53_28_E
pond
(m1 < 47)
47_15_10_N
industrial
Wastes from
64
Romania
Iasi
Blagesti
14
0
500
Siret River
020400
100.000
4
45
1
2
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
16
26_45_32_E
waste
sugar processing
(m1 < 47)
not specified
m³ too
(waste solutions
small, m1
Lalomita
hazardous
and muds
m³ too
65
Romania
Dambovita
Fieni
15
0
180
110103
20
5
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
River
waste
containing
(m1 < 47)
small
chromium but
data for FP
without cyanides
and SM
17
not specified (
waste solutions
and cyanuric
muds (alkalines)
m³ too
with heavy metals
small, m1
hazardous
110101
m³ too
66
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
0
not specified
other than
11
5
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
waste
110103
small
chromium, waste
(m1 < 47)
data for FP
solutions and
and SM
muds containing
chromium but
18
without cyanides)
not specified
(waste solutions
m³ too
and cyanuric
small, m1
hazardous
m³ too
67
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
0
800
Ilfov Brook
muds (alkalines)
110101
6
5
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
waste
small
with heavy metals
(m1 < 47)
data for FP
others than
and SM
19
chromium)
not specified
(waste solutions
m³ too
and cyanuric
small, m1
hazardous
m³ too
68
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
1
0
800
Ilfov brook
deposit
muds (alkalines)
110101
6
5
45
no data
no data
< 47, no
wastes
with heavy metals
(m1 < 47)
small
data for FP
others than
and SM
20
chromium)
m1 < 47,
industrial
69
Romania
Bacau
Bacau
17
0
3000
Bistrita River
deposit
wood processing not specified
40000
4
43
no data
no data
no data for m1 < 47
wastes
(m1 < 47)
FP and SM
21
44_59_15_N
Lalomita
slag and ash
not specified
88
Romania
Dambovita
Doicesti
4
0
50
100101
500.000
3
37
1
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
22
25_24_02_E
River
pond
(fireplace ash)
(m1 < 47)
Old Danube-
89
Romania
Tulcea
Turcoaia
20
0
5000
deposit
sterile pond
not specified
not specified
440000
3
37
3
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
23
Macin Arm
(m1 < 47)
industrial
Wastes from sugar
90
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
11
0
250
Danube
deposit
435000
3
37
1
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
24
wastes
beet processing
(m1 < 47)
Rompetrol in
Danube,
industrial
oil sludge
25
97
Romania
Navodari
Constanta
industrial deposit
130.000
55
3
2
330
2
Navodari
black sea
deposit
pond
Appendix 1, Table (f): Reported deposit and industrial sites, Austria (5 deposit sites, 11 industrial sites) (30.07.2006):
n.d. ... not determinable
deposit sites:
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor m2-value / classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
or
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures comment
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
s
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
in kg
M31, x=
Metalle,
Sankt Veit an
Landfill
21
Austria
Kärnten
Althofen
K7
5192050, y=
1
Gurk
deposit
0840
Industriemüll
seit 1922
Mineralisieru
500.000
5,0
55
0
2
0
4
der Glan
Roßwiese
1
85950
ng
CKW
Industrieabfäl
(Tetrachloret
M31, x=
le,
hen,
Sankt Veit an
lime dump
22
Austria
Kärnten
Brückl
K20
5178385, y=
1
Gurk
deposit
0420
Bauschutt,
seit 1930
Trichlorethen
250.000
4,5
51
0
3
0
4
der Glan
site Brückl I/II
91658
Aushubmater
,
ial
Hexachlorbut
2
adien)
Hausmüll,
erhöhte
M31, x=
Bauschutt,
Mineralisieru
23
Austria
Tirol
Schwaz
Pill, Weer
Landfill Pill
T7
5243100, y=
1
Inn
deposit
2070
Industrie-
ng,
1.000.000
4,0
50
0
3
0
4
10100
/Gewerbemül
reduzierende
l
Verhältnisse
3
Hausmüll,
reduzierende
M34, x=
Bauschutt,
Verhältnisse,
Niederöstereic
24
Austria
Tulln
Tulln
Landfill Tulln
N49
5356960, y= -
3
Danube
deposit
2070
Industrie-
seit 1934
erhöhte
200.000
3,5
42
3
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
h
20420
/Gewerbemül
Mineralisieru
(m1 < 47)
l
ng
4
Industrial
M31, x=
deposit
Industrieabfäl
Magnesium,
57
Austria
Kärnten
Villach Land
Ferndorf
K21
5177019, y=
1
Drau
deposit
1030
seit 1914
500.000
3,5
42
0
3
m1 < 47
m1 < 47
Heraklithwerk
le
Sulfat
(m1 < 47)
5
22827
e Ferndorf
industrial sites:
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor m2-value / classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
or
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures comment
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
s
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
in kg
M34, x=
Tanklager für
Mineralöl,
22.
Tankfarm
2
Austria
Wien
Wien
W12
5337100, y=
1
Danube
industrial site Mineralölprod
1950-1992 Kohlenwasse
100100
1.000.000
5,0
59
ind.site
0
1
0
4
Donaustadt
Lobau
13000
ukte
rstoffe
1
PAK, Cyanid,
M34, x=
Mineralöl,
11.
Gas works
3
Austria
Wien
Wien
W18
5338402, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
Gaswerk
1973 - 1989 Phenole,Am
325.000
5,0
58
ind.site
0
3
0
4
Simmering
Simmering
6854
monium,
Sulfat
2
Mineralöllage
M34, x=
11.
EBS-BP-
rung,
Mineralöl,
4
Austria
Wien
Wien
W1
5337400, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
0050
seit 1942
070100
200.000
5,0
58
ind.site
0
2
0
4
Simmering
TKV
Tierkörperver
CKW
10000
3
wertung
Cyanid,
Kohlenwasse
M34, x=
Chemische
1923-
rstoffe,
5
Austria
Wien
23. Liesing
Wien
Siebenhirten
W8
5333000, y= -
1
Liesing
industrial site Grundstoffin
150.000
5,0
58
ind.site
0
3
0
4
1960/61
Phenol,
2800
dustrie
Ammonium,
4
Nitrit, Sulfat
Teerag-
M34, x=
PAK,
11.
Teerverarbeit
6
Austria
Wien
Wien
Asdag-
W21
5338000, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
1926-1981
Phenole,
170701
130.000
5,0
58
ind.site
0
2
0
4
Simmering
ung
5
Simmering
8600
BTX
refinery
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Mineralöl-
Mineralöl,
7
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg Tuttendorfer
N16
5355250, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
0050
seit 1882
180.000
4,5
58
ind.site
0
3
0
4
h
Raffinerie
CKW
6
Breite
250
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Shipyard
Metalle,
8
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg
N33
5356050, y= -
3
Danube
industrial site
Schiffbau
0420
1920-1960
200.000
4,0
57
ind.site
3
3
513
2
h
Korneuburg
Mineralöl
7
1100
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
refinery
Mineralöl-
Mineralöl,
11
Austria
Mödling
Vösendorf
N20
5331650, y= -
1
Petersbach industrial site
0670
1845-1994
145.000
4,5
57
ind.site
0
3
0
4
h
Vösendorf
Raffinerie
PAK
8
1200
Leather
M31, x=
Lederverarbei
12
Austria
Kärnten
Klagenfurt
Klagenfurt
factory
K22
5166094, y=
1
Glan
industrial site
2070
1930-1990
Chrom
120.000
4,5
57
ind.site
0
3
0
4
tung
9
Neuner
75848
CKW,
Trichlorethen
Donau
M31, x=
Chemische
,
Sankt Veit an
16
Austria
Kärnten
Brückl
Chemie
K5
5177850, y=
2
Gurk
industrial site Grundstoffin
0050
seit 1909
Tetrachloreth
50.000
5,0
56
ind.site
1
2
112
3
der Glan
Brückl
91450
dustrie
en,
Hexachlorbut
10
adien
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Tankfarm
Mineralöllage
29
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg
N46
5328350, y= -
3
Danube
industrial site
0010
1900-1975
Mineralöl
10.000
4,0
51
ind.site
3
2
306
2
h
11
Mare
r
1250
Appendix 1, Table (g): Reported deposit sites, Germany (2 records) (30.07.2006):
n.d. ... not determinable
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor m2-value / classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
or
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures comment
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
s
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
in kg
municipal
waste,
accompanied
Stadt
Stadt
Deponie
R: 4543249
1946 until
by
10
Germany
2
200
Danube
old deposit
1.450.000
3,5
46
3
1
m1 < 47
n.d.
Straubing
Straubing
Peterswöhrd
H: 5417000
1977
construction
(m1 < 47)
waste and
industrial
1
waste
R: 4390858
1960 until
municipal
2
46
Germany
Dillingen
Dillingen
Hühnerwörth
2
200
Danube
old deposit
470.000
4,0
47
3
1
141
3
H: 5382545
1977
waste
Appendix 1, Table (h): Reported deposit sites, Ukraine (3 records) (30.07.2006):
n.d. ... not determinable
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor m2-value / classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
or
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures comment
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
s
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
in kg
The Odessa
area Izmail
Storehouse
no data for
19
Ukraine
Cellulose
200.000
5
55
no data
no data
n.d.
CaCl + Na2O
FP and SM
cardboard
1
combine
The Odessa
area Izmail
cleaning
23300 per
no data for
20
Ukraine
Cellulose
4
53
no data
no data
n.d.
contructions
day
FP and SM
cardboard
2
combine
the forest
m1 < 47,
village of "Zatova", str/
industrial
no data for
70
Ukraine
town type
0
600
Uzh
wastes
Solid wastes
1.48.21
30.000
4
43
no data
no data
m1 < 47
Budivelnikov,
deposit
Perechin
(m1 < 47)
FP and
3
1
SM
Appendix 1, Table (i): Reported deposit sites, Czech Republic (1 record) (30.07.2006):
n.d. ... not determinable
Endanger
old
mass of
height
in use
hazardou
factor
factor m2-value / classificat
ed by
deposit or
hazardou
mass of
communit location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
s
waste
area in
capacity
Risk
relevant
flood
safety
or
ion
Item Nr.
Country
Region
county
Floods,
river
old
branch
s
waste
wastes in
m1-value
y
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
value r0
for m2
potential measures comment
system
Flood fre-
industrial
substance
t
level
timeframe
s
(FP)
(SM)
s
1,2,3,4.
quency
site
in kg
Sludge
lagoons in
m³ too small,
Czech
Desna river
industrial
the waste
41
Sumperk
0
heavy metals
sludge
6.000
5
49
(m³ too
0
no data
no data for
n.d.
Republic
(river km 6)
deposit
water
SM
treatment
small)
1
plant
Appendix 1, Table (j): Reported deposit sites (Igor Liska, Version: 13.06.2005):
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
Risk
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
Potential
Nr.
Country
Region county community
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures according
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
m2
quency
site
45_07_18_N
Old Danube-
waste not
1
Romania
Tulcea
Turcoaia
#WERT!
5000
sterile pond
not specified not specified
440.000
n.e.
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
3
3
no data
28_11_05_E
Macin Arm
specified
M34, x=
Tanklager für
Mineralöl,
22.
Tankfarm
2
Austria
Wien
Wien
W12
5337100, y=
1
Danube
industrial site Mineralölpro
1950-1992 Kohlenwasse
100100
1.000.000
5,0
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
59,00
ind.site
0
1
0
Donaustadt
Lobau
13000
dukte
rstoffe
PAK, Cyanid,
M34, x=
Mineralöl,
11.
Gas works
3
Austria
Wien
Wien
W18
5338402, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
Gaswerk
1973 - 1989 Phenole,Am
325.000
5,0
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58,00
ind.site
0
3
0
Simmering
Simmering
6854
monium,
Sulfat
Mineralöllage
M34, x=
11.
rung,
Mineralöl,
4
Austria
Wien
Wien
EBS-BP-TKV
W1
5337400, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
0050
seit 1942
070100
200.000
5,0
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58,00
ind.site
0
2
0
Simmering
Tierkörperver
CKW
10000
wertung
Cyanid,
Kohlenwasse
M34, x=
Chemische
rstoffe,
5
Austria
Wien
23. Liesing
Wien
Siebenhirten
W8
5333000, y= -
1
Liesing
industrial site Grundstoffin
1923-1960/61
150.000
5,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58,00
ind.site
0
3
0
Phenol,
2800
dustrie
Ammonium,
Nitrit, Sulfat
Teerag-
M34, x=
PAK,
11.
Teerverarbeit
6
Austria
Wien
Wien
Asdag-
W21
5338000, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
1926-1981
Phenole,
170701
130.000
5,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58,00
ind.site
0
2
0
Simmering
ung
Simmering
8600
BTX
refinery
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Mineralöl-
Mineralöl,
7
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg Tuttendorfer
N16
5355250, y=
1
Danube
industrial site
0050
seit 1882
180.000
4,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
58,00
ind.site
0
3
0
h
Raffinerie
CKW
Breite
250
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Shipyard
Metalle,
8
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg
N33
5356050, y= -
3
Danube
industrial site
Schiffbau
0420
1920-1960
200.000
4,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
57,00
ind.site
3
3
513
h
Korneuburg
Mineralöl
1100
Central
Transdanubian
X=642 735
industrial
industrial
190200
9
Hungary
Environmental
Dunaújváros Dunaferr Inc.
#WERT!
Y=174 625
2
Danube
sewage
1.500.000
1.500.000
5
55
57
0
3
0
deposit
190804
Iinspectorates
sludge
Area
municipal
waste,
accompanied
Stadt
Stadt
Deponie
R: 4543249
by
10
Germany
2
200
Danube
old deposit
1946 until 1977
1.450.000
5,0
55
57
3
1
171
Straubing
Straubing
Peterswöhrd
H: 5417000
construction
waste and
industrial
waste
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
refinery
Mineralöl-
Mineralöl,
11
Austria
Mödling
Vösendorf
N20
5331650, y= -
1
Petersbach industrial site
0670
1845-1994
145.000
4,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
57
ind.site
0
3
0
h
Vösendorf
Raffinerie
PAK
1200
Leather
M31, x=
Lederverarbe
12
Austria
Kärnten
Klagenfurt
Klagenfurt
factory
K22
5166094, y=
1
Glan
industrial site
2070
1930-1990
Chrom
120.000
4,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
57
ind.site
0
3
0
itung
Neuner
75848
slags from
primary and
secondary
melting,
(other not
specified
100501,
Tamava
inorganic
060199,
46_06_35_N
50
industrial
13
Romania
Sibiu
Copsa Mica
#WERT!
0
Mare River
wastes other
100504,
1.350.000
5
55
57
1
2
114
24_14_27_E
2
waste
Visa Brook
inorganic
170405,
matters from
170701
thermic
processes as
suspensions
or dust, iron
and steel)
not
processed
slag, lining
and
refractory
waste
materials,
100202
furnace slag,
100206
foundry
100903
slag and ash
shapes
14
Romania
Hunedoara
Calan
#WERT!
0
3500
Strei River
101003
1.300.000
5
55
57
1
3
171
pond
containing
050603
organic
100901
ligands,
101001
wastes from
mixture
preparation
previously
thermic
processing,
other tars
not
processed
slag, lining
and
refractory
waste
materials,
100202,
furnace slag,
100206,
foundry
100903,
45_43_54_N
slag and ash
shapes
15
Romania
Hunedoara
Calan
15
0
3500
Strei River
deposit
101003,
1300000
5
55
57
1
3
171
22_59_35_E
pond
containing
050603,
organic
100901,
ligands,wast
101001
es from
mixture
preparation
previously
thermic
processing,
other tars
CKW,
Trichlorethen
Donau
M31, x=
Chemische
,
Sankt Veit an
16
Austria
Kärnten
Brückl
Chemie
K5
5177850, y=
2
Gurk
industrial site Grundstoffin
0050
seit 1909
Tetrachloreth
50.000
5,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
56
ind.site
1
2
112
der Glan
Brückl
91450
dustrie
en,
Hexachlorbut
adien
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
Risk
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
Potential
Nr.
Country
Region county community
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures according
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
m2
quency
site
red-sludge
ZSNP, Ziar
Hron 125,3
bed, danger
alkaline
17
Slovakia
4
Hron
since 1957
200115
1000000
5
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
55
0
no data
no data
n./Hronom
r.km
waste
water
deposit
deposit of
deposit of
Malina 6,0
danger
18
Slovakia
A.S.A. Zohor
3
Morava
mixed
since 1996
130000
350000
5
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
55
3
no data
no data
r.km
waste, oil
danger waste
waste
deposit of
Skladka
industrial
Bezmenny
industrial
19
Slovakia
odpadov
1
Vah
waste
since 1965
60403
600000
5
55
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
55
0
no data
no data
creek
arsenical
OFZ, Siroka
deposit
waste
The Odessa
area Izmail
Storehouse
20
Ukraine
Cellulose
200.000
5
55
55
no data
no data
no data
CaCl + Na2O
cardboard
combine
The Odessa
area Izmail
cleaning
23300 per
21
Ukraine
Cellulose
4
55
53
no data
no data
no data
contructions
day
cardboard
combine
M31, x=
Metalle,
Sankt Veit an
Landfill
22
Austria
Kärnten
Althofen
K7
5192050, y=
1
Gurk
deposit
0840
Industriemüll
seit 1922
Mineralisieru
500.000
5,0
50
55
0
2
0
der Glan
Roßwiese
85950
ng
CKW
Industrieabfäl
(Tetrachloret
M31, x=
le,
hen,
Sankt Veit an
lime dump
23
Austria
Kärnten
Brückl
K20
5178385, y=
1
Gurk
deposit
0420
Bauschutt,
seit 1930
Trichlorethen
250.000
4,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
51
0
3
0
der Glan
site Brückl I/II
91658
Aushubmater
,
ial
Hexachlorbut
adien)
Hausmüll,
erhöhte
M31, x=
Bauschutt,
Mineralisieru
24
Austria
Tirol
Schwaz
Pill, Weer
Landfill Pill
T7
5243100, y=
1
Inn
deposit
2070
Industrie-
ng,
1.000.000
4,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
50
0
3
0
10100
/Gewerbemül
reduzierende
l
Verhältnisse
Hausmüll,
reduzierende
M34, x=
Bauschutt,
Verhältnisse,
Niederöstereic
25
Austria
Tulln
Tulln
Landfill Tulln
N49
5356960, y= -
3
Danube
deposit
2070
Industrie-
seit 1934
erhöhte
200.000
3,5
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
42
3
3
378
h
20420
/Gewerbemül
Mineralisieru
(m1 < 47)
l
ng
Central
Transdanubian
Bakonyi
industrial
26
Hungary
Environmental
Ajka
1
0
Torna
gray sludge
190101
15.000.000
15.000.000
4
49
53
0
1
0
Erm Inc.
deposit
Iinspectorates
Area
46_33_12_n
slag and ash
27
Romania
Bacau
Letea Veche
2
0
1,5
Siret River
fuel burning
100100
13.150.000
4
49
53
3
2
318
26_56_51_E
pond
Middle Danube
Environmental
Fixon Bt.-
old industrial Old mining
slag and dust
190101
28
Hungary
Lrinci
3
0
Zagyva
5.000.000
4
49
53
0
3
0
Inspectorates
Humiron Ltd.
site
tailing
ash
190103
area
deposit of
liqued
BUCINA,
Zolna 1,5
industrial
29
Slovakia
4
Hron
waste,fenole,
since 1950
190106
20000
5
51
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
51
0
no data
no data
Horny Sturec
r.km
liquid waste
(m³ too
formaldehyd
small)
e
M34, x=
Niederöstereic
Tankfarm
Mineralöllage
30
Austria
Korneuburg Korneuburg
N46
5328350, y= -
3
Danube
industrial site
0010
1900-1975
Mineralöl
10.000
4,0
50
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
51
ind.site
3
2
306
h
Mare
r
1250
AES borsodi
North
Energetikai
Hungarian
sludgewater
Ltd
x=800 150
old mining
800.000 and
31
Hungary
Environmental
Tiszaújváros
1
2
Tisa (483)
and slag-
100100
1.400.000
4
49
50
0
2
0
Tiszapalkony
y=286 711
tailing
1.400.000
Inspectorate
dust-ash
Area
ai Herm
Béghin-Say
Cukorgyár
Middle Tisa
Inc.(technolo
X=734 750
contaminate
Environmental
industrial
waste water
waste water
32
Hungary
Szolnok
gy waste-
2
Y=200 250
2
Tisa (330)
d surface
1.300.000
4
49
50
1
1
50
Inspectorates
deposit
sludgein lake
sludge
water
water
Area
thickerer)
not specified
Tumu
43_43_50_N
pyrite ash
(wastes
33
Romania
Teleorman
1
0
150
Danube
060400
1.900.000
4
49
50
1
2
100
Magurele
24_52_05_E
pond
containing
metals)
slags from
primary and
secondary
melting, other
not specified
100501,
Tarnava
inorganic
060199,
Mare
industrial
wastes, other
34
Romania
Sibiu
Copsa Mica
18
0
50; 2
deposit
100504,
1350000
4
49
50
1
2
100
River;Visa
wastes
inorganic
170405,
brook
matters from
thermic
170701
processes as
susspenssions
or dust,iron
and steel)
CHEMKO,
Ondava 16,2
deposit -
leach out
35
Slovakia
3
Bodrog
since 1955
190202
800000
4
49
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
49
0
no data
no data
Strazske
rkm
industrial
during flood
36
Slovakia
DUSLO, Sala
3
Vah 54 r.km
Vah
DUSLO Sala
sludge bed
since 1980
190804
750000
4
49
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
49
0
no data
no data
sludge
CHEMKO,
Ondava 43,2
deposit -
leach out
37
Slovakia
3
Bodrog
since 1959
190202
600000
4
49
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
49
0
no data
no data
Strazske
rkm
sludge
during flood
reservoir
Slag and
slag and ash
38
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
1
0
3000
Danube
ashes from
100100
655.000
4
49
49
1
2
98
pond
coal burning
Forrós-
Middle Tisa
BERVA Inc.(
X=744 160
belwatercana
contaminate
Environmental
chemical
industrial
polluted
10.500 and
39
Hungary
Heves
#WERT!
Y=251 350
0
l (8) Hanyi-ér
hydrocarbon
d soil and
5
51,0
#WERT!
#WERT!
51
(m³ too
0
3
0
Inspectorates
pollution )
deposit
earth
5.000
(16) Tisa
groundwater
Area
small)
(388)
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
Risk
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
Potential
Nr.
Country
Region county community
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures according
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
m2
quency
site
not specified
(wastes from
ferrous
pieces
Ialomita
slag and ash
40
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
23
0
200
deposit
foundry,
100900
12000
5
51
51
0
no data
no data
River
pond
(m³ too
some of
small)
them might
be
dangerous)
deposit of
liqued
Bucina,
Zolna 1,5
industrial
41
Slovakia
waste,fenole,
190106
20.000
5
51
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
51
0
no data
no data
Horny Sturec
r.km
deposit
(m³ too
formaldehyd
small)
e
Sludge
lagoons in
Czech
Desna river
industrial
the waste
42
Sumperk
0
heavy metals
sludge
6.000
5
49
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
49
0
no data
no data
Republic
(river km 6)
deposit
water
(m³ too
treatment
small)
plant
deposit of
PETROCHE
Hron 208
gudrons
overspill by
43
Slovakia
4
Hron
since 1964
190202
120000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
0
no data
no data
MA, Predajna
r.km
PETROCHE
heavy raining
MA
ENO,
ENO
Nitra 128
deposit of fly-
44
Slovakia
Zemianske
3
Nitra
Zemianske
since 1965
190103
300000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
0
no data
no data
r.km
ash
Kostolany
Kostolany
KOVOHUTY,
Hornad
sludge
leach out
45
Slovakia
3
Hornad
since 1967
190202
285000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
10
no data
no data
Krompachy
186,0 rkm
deposit
during flood
sludge
BUKOCEL,
Ondava 48,7
deposit -
leach out
46
Slovakia
Vranov
3
Bodrog
since 1983
190202
153000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
1
no data
no data
rkm
links bank
during flood
n.Toplou
meander
R: 4390858
47
Germany
Dillingen
Dillingen
Hühnerwörth
2
200
Danube
old deposit
1960 until 1977
municipal waste
470.000
4,0
47
47
3
1
141
H: 5382545
Central
Transdanubian
X=642 735
Dunapack
Danube
industrial
48
Hungary
Environmental
Dunaújváros
1
Y=174 625
2
mix sludge
190100
212.000
212.000
4
47
47
0
3
0
Inc.
(1573)
deposit
Iinspectorates
Area
North
Tisa
Hungarian
Chemical
x=798 042
industry
industrial
49
Hungary
Environmental
Tiszaújváros
Self-
2
Y=287 515
2
Tisa (484)
sewage
190100
211.000
4
47
47
0
2
0
deposit
Inspectorate
contained
earth dam
Area
plant
deposit of
Skladka
Semetes /in
common and
leaking tube
50
Slovakia
TKO,
2
Vah
1968-2000
190202
105000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
3
no data
no data
tube/
industrial
line
Turzovka
waste
closed
Teplaren,
industrial
deposit of fly-
51
Slovakia
Povazska
1
Ziar /in tube/
Vah
waste
ash of refuse 1978-2000
190103
345000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
0
no data
no data
Bystrica
deposit
inicinerating
plant
Wastes from
43_59_20_N
industrial
52
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
#BEZUG!
0
250
Danube
sugar beet
020400
435.000
4
47
47
1
3
141
22_56_30_E
waste
processing
Hór Brook (2)
North
Mezkövesd
Kánya Brook
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
,,B" area
x=768 200
(14) Rima
old military
polluted soil
300.000 and
53
Hungary
Environmental
Mezkövesd Airp Old Fuel
#BEZUG!
Y=274 000
0
4
47
#WERT!
#WERT!
47
0
3
0
Brook (8)
site
and
60.000
Inspectorate
depot
Area
Tisa (434)
groundwater
heavy metal
Middle Danube
Abandon
and
Budapest,
Environmental
sewage
hydrocarbon
54
Hungary
Csepel-
#BEZUG!
0
Danube
deposit
060405
300.000
300.000
4
47
47
1
3
141
Inspectorates
sludge
(CH) polluted
island Nord
area
depots
organic
compounds
not specified
(waste
solutions and
hazardous
muds
55
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
#BEZUG!
0
1500
Ilfov Brook
110103
3.028
5
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
100
47
0
no data
no data
waste
containing
(m³ too
chromium
small)
but without
cyanides
organic
solvents,
industrial
washing
56
Romania
Giurgiu
Giurgiu
3
0
3000
Danube
deposit
070104
3000
5
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
0
no data
no data
wastes
liquids and
(m³ too
mother
small)
solutions
deposit of
danger
Malina 6,0
industrial
57
Slovakia
A.S.A. Zohor
premixed waste
190202
350.000
cca 350000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
3
no data
no data
waste, oil
r.km
deposit
waste
deposit of
gudrons
Hron 208
industrial
overspill by
58
Slovakia
Predajna
050100
120.000
4
47
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
47
0
no data
no data
PETROCHE
r.km
deposit
heavy raining
MA
Industrial
M31, x=
deposit
Industrieabfäl
Magnesium,
59
Austria
Kärnten
Villach Land
Ferndorf
K21
5177019, y=
1
Drau
deposit
1030
seit 1914
500.000
3,5
42
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
42
0
3
0
Heraklithwer
le
Sulfat
22827
(m1 < 47)
ke Ferndorf
NCHZ,
Nitra 123
NCHZ
deposit of
60
Slovakia
4
Nitra
since 1968
20402
12000000
3
40
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
0
no data
no data
Novaky
r.km
Novaky
calc-sludge
(m1 < 47)
Upper Danube
X=592 500
VII.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
61
Hungary
1
Y=265 000
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
3.250.000
3
40
45
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
03/29,30,31
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
not specified
(muds from
hazardous
62
Romania
Dambovita
Gaesti
6
0
1100
Arges River
deposit
industrial
190804
30.6
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
no data
wastes
waste water
(m1 < 47)
treatment)
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
Risk
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
Potential
Nr.
Country
Region county community
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures according
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
m2
quency
site
not specified
(waste
solutions and
cyanuric
muds
(alkalines)
with heavy
metals
hazardous
110101,
63
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
4
0
not specified
deposit
others than
10.5
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
no data
wastes
110103
chromium,
(m1 < 47)
wastes
solutions and
muds
containing
chromium
but without
cyanides)
Central
Torna (52)
Transdanubian
MAL Inc. I-
x=534 000
Marcal (97,8) industrial
red dross
64
Hungary
Environmental
Ajka
VIII. store,
5
0
010303
29.000.000
29.000.000
3
40
45
no data
no data
no data
y=194 000
Rába (
deposit
settlements
Iinspectorates
reclaimed
(m1 < 47)
Area
204,6)
45_53_47_N
slag and ash
65
Romania
Hunedoara
Mintia
13
0
500
Mures River
deposit
fireplace ash
100101
9700000
3
40
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
1
3
135
22_53_28_E
pond
(m1 < 47)
Wastes from
47_15_10_N
industrial
66
Romania
Iasi
Blagesti
14
0
500
Siret River
sugar
020400
100.000
4
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
1
2
90
26_45_32_E
waste
processing
(m1 < 47)
not specified
(waste
solutions and
Lalomita
hazardous
muds
67
Romania
Dambovita
Fieni
15
0
180
110103
20
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
no data
River
waste
containing
(m1 < 47)
chromium
but without
cyanides
not specified
( waste
solutions and
cyanuric
muds
(alkalines)
with heavy
metals other
hazardous
110101
68
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
0
not specified
than
11
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
no data
waste
110103
chromium,
(m1 < 47)
waste
solutions and
muds
containing
chromium
but without
cyanides)
not specified
(waste
solutions and
cyanuric
hazardous
muds
69
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
0
800
Ilfov Brook
110101
6
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
no data
waste
(alkalines)
(m1 < 47)
with heavy
metals
others than
chromium)
not specified
(waste
solutions and
cyanuric
hazardous
muds
70
Romania
Dambovita
Targoviste
1
0
800
Ilfov brook
deposit
110101
6
5
45
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
45
no data
no data
no data
wastes
(alkalines)
(m1 < 47)
with heavy
metals
others than
chromium)
industrial
wood
71
Romania
Bacau
Bacau
17
0
3000
Bistrita River
deposit
not specified
40000
4
43
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
43
no data
no data
no data
wastes
processing
(m1 < 47)
the forest
village of
"Zatova", str/
industrial
72
Ukraine
town type
0
600
Uzh
wastes
Solid wastes
1.48.21
30.000
4
43
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
43
no data
no data
no data
Budivelnikov,
deposit
Perechin
(m1 < 47)
1
PETROCHE
deposit of
Hron 206
industrial
73
Slovakia
washed up during f
050100
50.000
4
43
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
43
0
no data
no data
MA area
gudrons
r.km
deposit
(m1 < 47)
Upper Danube
VI.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
74
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
1.800.000
3
40
42
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
06/8
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
Üll-Laposi
(7) Német-éri
Middle Tisa
(13)
X=781 755
Old Soviet
Environmental
Military
Hortobágy-
old military
polluted
contaminate
75
Hungary
Kunmadaras
#WERT!
Y=232 001
0
Military
hydrocarbon
14.500
4
41
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
41
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
Airport
Berettyó (82)
site
earth
d soil
Airport
(m1 < 47)
Area
Hármas-
Körös (61)
Tisa (243)
hydrocarbon
Middle Danube
Former
(CH)
Environmental
Kiskunlacház
old military
Soviet
76
Hungary
#WERT!
0
Danube
aviation
9.000
4
41
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
41
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
a
site
military
kerosine
(m1 < 47)
area
airport
pollution
Upper Danube
X= 600 871
VIII.
Environmental
Neszmély
Old mining
77
Hungary
#WERT!
Y=264 058
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
5.000.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
0125
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
Upper Danube
III.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
x=590 300
Old mining
78
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
1.000.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
118
y=265 600
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
Endanger
old
height
in use
mass of
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
Risk
factor
factor
Risk
ed by
deposit or
hazardous
mass of
location/ Registry
Grid
difference distance
branch
deposit
since/ in
hazardous
waste
area in
capacity
Risk value Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential relevant
flood
safety
Potential
Nr.
Country
Region county community
Floods,
river
old
branch
substance
waste
wastes in
name
No
system
to water
in m
No.
type
the
substance
code
sqm
in m³
r0
according according according according according for m2
potential measures according
Flood fre-
industrial
s
t
level
timeframe
in kg
old m1
old m2
old m3
old m4
new m1
(FP)
(SM)
m2
quency
site
Upper Danube
V.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
79
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
800.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
06/10
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
Upper Danube
IV.
Environmental
Almásfüzit
Old mining
80
Hungary
#WERT!
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
600.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
06/12
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
TVM Inc.
Middle Tisa
(waste of
X=732 950
Environmental
industrial
polluted
contaminate
81
Hungary
Szolnok
chemical
#WERT!
Y=199 716
2
Tisa (332)
200202
600.000
3
40,0
40
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
deposit
earth
d soil
industry)
(m1 < 47)
Area
Körös
Establishme
communal
reclaimed
Environmental
X=806 600
82
Hungary
Békéscsaba
n organic
#WERT!
0
Nádas canal
waste
waste
780.000
3
40
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
40
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
Y=148 550
waste
storage
storage
(m1 < 47)
Area
Middle Danube
Budapest,
Environmental
Metallochemi
Danube
old industrial Old mining
Pb, Zn, Cu,
83
Hungary
XXII.
#WERT!
0
metalslag
010400
650.000
650.000
3
40
40
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
a
(1479,4)
site
tailing
Cd
Harangozó u.
(m1 < 47)
area
DROTOVNE,
Drotovna
Fe- sludge
84
Slovakia
3
Vah 97 r.km
Vah
since 1962
190102
160000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
0
no data
no data
Hlohovec
Hlohovec
bed
(m1 < 47)
Upper Danube
I-II
Environmental
Almásfüzit
x=590 327
Danube 1749-
Old mining
85
Hungary
1
2
industrial site
Reservoir for
red dross
010303
450.000
3
37
37
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
119/11 Hrsz
y=265 665
1761 km
tailing
red-dross
(m1 < 47)
area
closed
deposit of
TKO,
deposit of
common and
86
Slovakia
Kysucke
2
Kysuca
Vah
fouling
1960-1998
190601
150000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
100
37
0
industrial
Nove Mesto
industrial
(m1 < 47)
waste
sludge
North
MH
Tarna (49)
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
x=736 250
Tarnaszentm
Zagyva (58) old military
polluted soil
69.000 and
87
Hungary
Environmental
Tarnaszentm
1
Y=281 850
0
4
37
#WERT!
#WERT!
37
no data
no data
no data
ária Fuel
Tisa (335
site
and
69.000
Inspectorate
ária
(m1 < 47)
Area
depot
groundwater
North
MH
Kánya Brook
hydrocarbon
Hungarian
Mezkövesd
(14) Rima
Mezkövesd
x=762 425
old military
polluted soil
52.500 and
88
Hungary
Environmental
Fuel depot
2
0
Brook (8)
4
37
#WERT!
#WERT!
37
no data
no data
no data
Hrsz: 0456/2
Y=272 900
site
and
67.500
Inspectorate
,,K" area
Tisa (434)
(m1 < 47)
Area
groundwater
Middle Danube
hydrocarbon
Former
Environmental
old military
(CH) polluted
308000 and
89
Hungary
Tököl
3
0
Danube
military
3
37
37
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
site
soil and
209.900
airport
(m1 < 47)
area
groundwater
not specified
44_59_15_N
Lalomita
slag and ash
90
Romania
Dambovita
Doicesti
4
0
50
(fireplace
100101
500.000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
1
3
111
25_24_02_E
River
pond
ash)
(m1 < 47)
Old Danube-
91
Romania
Tulcea
Turcoaia
20
0
5000
deposit
sterile pond
not specified not specified
440000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
3
3
333
Macin Arm
(m1 < 47)
industrial
Wastes from
92
Romania
Dolj
Calafat
11
0
250
Danube
deposit
sugar beet
435000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
1
3
111
wastes
processing
(m1 < 47)
South
Transdanubian
X=622 150
Communal
Communal
Danube
settlement
93
Hungary
Environmental
Mohács
12
Y= 74 880
0
organic
organic
200301
370.000
3
37
37
no data
no data
no data
(1445)
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
Area
South
Transdanubian
X=529 650
Communal
Communal
settlement
94
Hungary
Environmental
Barcs
13
Y= 70 890
0
Drava (153)
organic
organic
300.000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
no data
no data
no data
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
Area
Körös
Establishme
communal
Environmental
X=818 000
95
Hungary
Gyula
n organic
14
0
White Körös
waste
200301
273.773
273.773
3
37
37
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
Y=146 100
waste
storage
(m1 < 47)
Area
ELEKTROLU
X - LEHEL
Middle Tisa
Ltd WDS-1
X=711 216
Environmental
Zagyva (67)
industrial
polluted
contaminate
96
Hungary
Jászberény
(waste of
15
Y=237 746
0
200202 155.000
3
37,0
37
no data
no data
no data
Inspectorates
Tisa (336)
deposit
earth
d soil
chemical
(m1 < 47)
Area
industry )
South
Transdanubian
X=585 860
Communal
Communal
settlement
97
Hungary
Environmental
Harkány
16
Y= 56 330
0
Drava (72)
organic
organic
114.000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
no data
no data
no data
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
Area
South
Transdanubian
X=590 640
Communal
Communal
settlement
98
Hungary
Environmental
Siklós
17
Y= 53 770
0
Drava (65)
organic
organic
112.000
3
37
#BEZUG!
#BEZUG!
37
no data
no data
no data
waste
Inspectorates
dump
dump
(m1 < 47)
Area
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist Annexes
APPENDIX 2
CHECKLIST FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND RISK
ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATED SITES IN
FLOOD RISK AREAS
Annex 1: Questionnaire of Contaminates Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 2: Branch Catalogue of Germany
Annex 3: European Waste Catalogue
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist Annexes
APPENDIX 2
CHECKLIST FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND RISK
ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATED SITES IN
FLOOD RISK AREAS
ANNEX 1: QUESTIONNAIRE OF CONTAMINATED
SITES IN FLOOD RISK AREAS
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
Questionnaire of General Information about Contaminated Sites in
Flood Risk Areas
The collection of general information is aimed to be a basic study (desk study), which
provides information about the investigated property in flood risk areas which may
consist of several items given below:
· General
data
· Hydro-geological
situation
· Location of the site and land-use
· Source of contamination
· History of the property use
· Status of the property
· Information about flooding potential
· Information about remediation and/or preventive measures
· Mobility and solubility of hazard contaminant
· Former investigations of the property
1 General data of the suspected contaminated site in flood risk
areas
Name of the property:
___________________________________________
Address:
___________________________________________
___________________________________________
___________________________________________
Coordinates (centre of the site)
___________________________________________
Source of information has to be listed according to table 1:
- 1 -
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
Table 1: List of sources of information (fill in if information is known)
Source
Contact person
Address/ Telephone/Telefax/E-mail
Present site
owner
Responsible
polluter
Local authorities
Contemporary
Witness
Further
2 Description of hydro-geological situation at the site
Geological setting
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Hydrological setting (e.g. aquifer type, flow regime, groundwater table, aquifer
thickness, hydraulic conductivity, direction of groundwater flow...)
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
Comments
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
- 2 -
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
3 Description of the location and land-use
Table 2: Compilation of sensitive bordering areas (multiple ticks possible)
Bordering the
Inside the
Area
area
area
Industrial area
Residential area
Hospital area
Nature protection area
Agricultural area
Forest area
Drinking water protection zone
Standing water body
Body of flowing water
Further
Additional information (special remarks to the site condition):
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
4 General information about the source of contamination
Is the contamination caused by:
Waste disposal (deposit site) :
Yes (if yes, go to 4.1)
No
Industrial activities
Yes (if yes, go to 4.2)
No
Other sources of contamination, e.g. incidents, leakages, operational losses:
Yes (if yes, go to 4.2)
No
Sewage sludge and/or waste-water treatment:
Yes (if yes, go to 4.3)
No
Other sources, such as: ......................................................................
Yes
No
4.1 General
information for deposit site
Disposal
was: Regular
Irregular
- 3 -
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
Waste was disposed in (multiple ticks possible):
Landfills
Disordered
deposit
Combustion
residues
Communal
deposits
Filling
of
pits
Filling
of
depressions
Combination
Others
______________________________
Other relevant information: _________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
4.2 General
information
for
industrial site and/or abandoned industrial site
or other sources of contamination, e.g. incidents, leakages, operational
losses
Short description of surface and subsurface installations (e.g. pipes, vessels, tanks),
which can cause a hazard potential for the environment:
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
Please list the installations in the following tab. 3:
Table 3: List of installations
Installation is built
Installation is
Volume
in m³
Installation
(if
nd
s
t
s
t
e
r
-
nd
r
ift
ed
known)
a
c
e
ved
ved
Above
grou
Und
grou
On water
surf
Emptied
sa
again
up-d
sa
again
leakage
seal
- 4 -
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
Is the subsurface of the installation affected by pollution? (proof according to
organoleptic test)
Yes
No
not sure
Did
incidents
occur?
Yes
No
Year
of
incident(s):
______________________________________
Type of substances/chemicals set free: ______________________________________
Amount of substances/chemicals set free: ______________________________________
Other relevant information:
______________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
4.3
General information for sewage sludge and/or waste-water treatment
Type
of
treatment:
______________________________________
The treatment plant was constructed in the year: ________________________________
Capacity of the treatment plant:
________________________________
Condition of the sewerage system is:
Good Insufficient
Unpredictable
Condition of the sewage system is:
Good Insufficient
Unpredictable
Sewage sludge is/ was disposed/treated
On-site
Off-site
Other relevant information:
______________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
- 5 -
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
5 History of the property use
The information about former land-use of the property indicates possible contamination
at the site. The former land-use has to be filled in chronological order in table 4.
Table 4: List of former use of the site
Not
Time frame
Former use
Confirmed
Probable contamination
confirmed
6 Status of the property
The table 5 refers to information about the present situation of the property and the
present activities at a site.
Table 5: Status of activities at the property
Status
Yes
No
Closed-down
Closed-down with official consent
Operating
Operating with permit
Listed for control
Others:
7 General information about the flooding potential
Is the contaminated site safe against flood events?
Yes
No
Unpredictable
- 6 -
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
Is the whole contaminated site endangered by flooding or only parts?
Whole site
Parts
Reasons for flooding:
Rain
event
Yes
No
By back pressure from water bodies or canals:
Yes
No
By rising groundwater levels as a result of extended periods of high water
Yes
No
Which data confirmed the danger of flooding?
Monitoring
data
Yes
No
Hydrological
surveys Yes
No
Contemporary
witness
Yes
Yes
Others: Specify:
____________________________________________________
8 General information about remediation measures and/or
preventive measures set at a contaminated site
Are remediation measures and/or preventive measures already implemented to lower the
risk of flooding at a contaminated site?
Yes
No
If yes which measures are set?
Excavation of contaminated soil
Appropriate relocation and disposal of waste
Relocation and intermediate storage of waste
Drainage and intermediate storage of leachates
Technical measures against flooding
Others ________________________________________________
Remediation/decontamination of contaminated sectors
Bioremediation
Soil washing
Thermal treatment
Leachates drainage and treatment
Others ________________________________________________
- 7 -
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
Protective and restrictive measures
Sealing of surface
Encapsulation of contaminated volume
Encapsulation of tanks and vessels
Building of retention basin
Restoration of retention basin
Building of safety dams
Restoration of safety dams
Leachate collector system
Leachate treated
Cover system
Liner system
Monitoring and control of the landfill body
Monitoring and control of safety systems
Restricted use of the property
Prohibition to access
Closure of the property
Others ________________________________________________
9 General information about the mobility of hazard contaminants
Danger arising from the emission of contaminants hazardous to water in case of flooding
depends on the mobility of the contaminant and the solubility of the harmful substance.
This chapter gives information whether the contaminants are mobile in case of flooding
or not.
The mobility of hazard substances is caused by:
Human error
Yes
No
Shockwave
Yes
No
Heavy rain events
Yes
No
High water
Yes
No
Human error is mainly characterized through activities which lead to contaminants
loss caused by improper locking or fixing of installations (e.g. if a sludge treatment
facility is not locked early enough since the flood occurs).
Shockwave could cause significant destruction on dams, retention basins and
installations or even a flush away of deposits or dumps, which will lead to a
contaminant discharge if they are insufficiently saved. Shockwave appear
predominantly in narrow valleys.
Heavy rain events could cause an instability of constructions, which lead to a less
function ability of safety installations (e.g. safety dams, groundings or retention
basins).
High water could cause a raising and destruction of underground storage
facilities, an instability of constructions and a mobilizing of contaminants in
unsaturated contaminated volume.
- 8 -
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
Hazard substances (please fill in table 6):
Table 6: Estimation of the mobility of hazard substances
Mobility is
Hazard
substance
High
Medium
Low
Unpredictable
10 Former Investigations of the property
Has the property already been investigated with regard to the hazard potential?
Yes
No
If yes, which investigation:
Historical investigation
Preliminary investigation
Detailed investigation
Description of the investigation:
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Source of information of the investigation:
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Were contaminated area(s) identified?
Yes
No
If no, a detailed investigation has to be started if the suspicion of contamination cannot
be excluded.
- 9 -
Questinonnaire of Contaminated Sites in Flood Risk Areas
Annex 1
If yes, were remedy measures already taken to prevent hazards in case of flooding?
Yes
No If no, plan for remedy action needs to be be started
If yes, which measures?
Description of the remediation measurements (see also chapter 3.2.):
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Short-term measures:
· Is no conclusive data available, data research has to be started. Contact to
meteorological network agencies is necessary
· If no data is available about the mobility potential of contaminants in case of
flooding, a hydro-geological investigation has to be started.
· To avoid impacts on the environment abandoned installations have to be cleared
and/or removed
· Prove the stability of dams and the dimension of retention basins (whether they
are sufficiently dimensioned and constructed for shock wave events or heavy rain
events).
· Prove if mobilising of contaminants caused by high water could be avoided by
sealing of contaminated volume or locking of installations
Medium and long term measures
· To avoid impacts on the environment abandoned installations have to be sealed.
· Build sufficiently dimensioned dams and retention basins to mitigate the impact of
shockwave and heavy rain events.
· To avoid the impact of shockwave remove installations and contaminated volume
from the flood risk area
· If the investigation does not affirm an adequate dimensioning start to reconstruct
old safety installations or build new safety installations
- 10 -
Final Report, M2 methodology / checklist Annexes
APPENDIX 2
CHECKLIST FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND RISK
ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATED SITES IN
FLOOD RISK AREAS
ANNEX 2: BRANCH CATALOGUE OF GERMANY
UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT
Branch Catalogue of Germany
Annex 2
- 1 -
Branch Catalogue of Germany
Annex 2
- 2 -
Branch Catalogue of Germany
Annex 2
- 3 -
Branch Catalogue of Germany
Annex 2
- 4 -
Branch Catalogue of Germany
Annex 2
- 5 -
APPENDIX 2
CHECKLIST FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND RISK
ASSESSMENT OF CONTAMINATED SITES IN
FLOOD RISK AREAS
ANNEX 3: EUROPEAN WASTE CATALOGUE
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 1 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 2 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 3 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 4 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 5 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 6 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 7 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 8 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 9 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 10 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 11 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 12 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 13 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 14 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 15 -
European Waste Catalogue
Annex 3
- 16 -
