AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION CONTROL PROJECT















FEASIBILITY STUDY

FOR MANURE STORAGE SYSTEM






























LIST OF CONTENTS

A. Descriptive

1. GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1 Name of investment objective
1.2 Designer
1.3 Implementing agency
1.4 Client
1.5 Location
1.6 Investment necessity and opportunity
1.7 Technological and operational description

2. INVESTMENT TECHNICAL DATA
2.1 Investment objective area and land tenure situation
2.2 Geomorphology of the investment location
2.3 Main characteristics of structures

2.3.1 Structures to be built

2.3.2 Principal features
2.4 Structural components

2.4.1 Concrete platform

2.4.2 Storage tank

2.4.3 Bunkers for segregated wastes

2.4.4 Access roads
2.4.5
Fencing
2.5 Required machinery and equipment
2.6 Ancillary installations
2.7 Other infrastructure

3. INFORMATION ON HUMAN RESOURCES
3.1 Total staff
3.2 Newly created jobs

4. INVESTMENT COST EVALUATION
4.1 General BoQ
4.2 BoQs for each investment component
4.3 Financial costs

5. MAIN TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC INDICES
5.1 Total investment value, of which construction & installation
5.2 Investment implementation schedule, of which construction & installation
5.3 Planned duration of investment implementation
5.4 Planned investment commissioning schedule

6. DISBURSEMENT SOURCES

7. NECESSARY PERMITS AND AUTHORIZATIONS


2



B. Drawings


1.
General
layout
map
scale
1:
100
000
2. Structures' 1&2 location plan
scale
1:


25
000
3. Structures' 3&4 location plan
scale
1:


25
000
4. Structures' 5&6 location plan
scale
1:


25
000
5. Structures' 7&8 location plan
scale
1:


25
000
6. Structures' 9&10 location plan
scale
1:


25
000
7. Structures' 11&12 location plan
scale
1:


25
000
8. Structures' 13&14 location plan
scale
1:


25
000
9. Manure storage platform- plan view



scale 1: 200
10.Manure storage platform- A-A elevation


scale 1: 200/50
11.Manure storage platform- B-B elevation


scale 1: 200/50


































3

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 Name of investment objective
This study refers to the "Design of Village-level Manure Management, Storage and
Handling System", namely to its manure storage platforms construction component.

1.2 Designer
This feasibility study was elaborated by the APCP Project Preparation Unit team, through
its civil engineering consultant, Eng. Anca Gheorghiu.

1.3 Implementing agency
The principal implementing agency, designated by the GoR is the Ministry of Waters and
Environmental Protection.

1.4 Client
The Client is represented by the "Agricultural Pollution Control Project" Project
Preparation Unit, with head offices in Calarasi, Romania.

1.5 Location
The objective of the feasibility study is represented by a number of 14 manure and
recyclable materials storage platforms, located within the territory of 7 communes from
Calarasi county, as follows:
Platforms #1 and #2, to be located in Alexandru Odobescu commune ­ platform #1 will
be situated to the north of Alexandru Odobescu village, surrounded to the N and to the W
by arable land from outside the village and to the E and S, by arable land pending
distribution through the Local Land Reform Commission. Platform #2 will be located to
the north of Nicolae Balcescu village, surrounded on all sides by arable land from outside
the village.
Platforms #3 and #4, to be located in Ciocanesti commune ­ platform #3 will be situated
to the north of Smirdan village, bordered to the N, E and W by arable land from outside
the village and to the S, by land formerly occupied by the livestock farm. Platform #4
will be located to the north of Sirbi village, bordered to the N, W and S by arable land
and to the E by a portion of land formerly occupied by the livestock farm.
Platforms #5 and #6, to be located in Cuza Voda commune ­ platform #5 will be situated
to the east of Cuza Voda village and to the SW of Calarasii Vechi village, bordered on all
sides by agricultural land from outside the village area. Platform #6 will be located to the
N of Ceacu village, bordered on all sides by agricultural land from outside the village
area.
Platforms #7, #8 and #9, to be located in Gradistea commune ­ platform #7 will be
situated to the north-west of Gradistea village, bordered to the N, E and S by land
formerly occupied by the livestock farm and to the W by Calarasi-Lehliu asphalt road.
Platform #8 will be located to the N of Rasa village, bordered to the N and E by arable
land and to the S and W by land formerly occupied by the animal farm.

4

Platform #9 will be situated to the SW of Rasa village and to the SE of Bogata village
respectively, bordered to the N, W and S by arable land and to the E by the Rasa -
Danube floodplain road.
Platforms #10 and #11, to be located in Independenta commune ­ platform #10 will be
situated to the SW of Independenta village, near the bank of Galatui lake, bordered on all
sides by communal grazing land.
Platform #11 will be located to the west of Visini village, surrounded on all sides by
arable land from outside the village.
Platforms #12 and #13, to be located in Vilcelele commune ­ platform #12 will be
situated to the south of Vilcelele village, at approx.1km south of the community
cemetery, bordered to the N, W and S by arable land from outside the village and to the
east by a communal road providing access to the agricultural exploitation.
Platform #13 will be located to the NE of Floroaica village, at approx.1km north-north-
east of the community cemetery, bordered to the N, W and S by arable land from outside
the village and to the E by a road that links Vilcelele ­ Cuza Voda county road with
Bucharest ­ Fetesti national road.
Platform #14, to be located in Vlad Tepes commune - this platform will be situated to the
east of Vlad Tepes village, at approx. 400 m of the administrative buildings of the village
agricultural commercial companies, bordered to the N, W and S by arable land from
outside the village and to the east by D.C 62 communal road.

In selecting platform locations, the following criteria were taken into consideration:
· Integration with the existing Land Planning Masterplan
· Safe minimum distance from the nearest household or building
· Safe minimum distance from the nearest stream or drinking water well
· Flexible enough to allow future extension
· Clear land tenure situation
· Population density and surrounding landscape
· Access facilities towards manure and domestic waste sources

1.6 Investment necessity and opportunity
This feasibility study is based upon the TOR for the Agricultural Pollution Control
Project, financed from GEF funds through the World Bank; this project aims to reduce
the amount of nutrients and other agricultural pollutants that enter Danube River and
Black Sea, by promoting environment-friendly agricultural practices within rural
communities.
The TOR include the design and provision of cost estimates for the construction of a
"village-level Manure Management, Storage and Handling System".
Existing waste management at village level may be described as below:
· Within households from the project rural area, domestic wastes (containing
plastic, glass, metal, cardboard materials) are usually mixed with manure
coming from the stock accommodation
· Primarily, the manure is deposited on the earth, in the proximity of stock
housing
· Urine and liquid phase from wastes' decomposition are allowed direct
infiltration into the ground or in some cases are collected through channels into
unlined pits

5

· Waste deposited near the stock housing was allowed to accumulate over 2-3
days before it is scraped up into a wheelbarrow and taken to a waste store,
usually located close to the large gates at the front of the holding; this is also
the place where the other household wastes are accumulated
· Each householder usually loads these wastes into a cart or trailer and takes
them to the existing commune level "platform"

Such system has obvious flaws, such as:
· Inside the holding, wastes are practically handled twice
· Wastes are contaminated, therefore making manure direct use onto agricultural
land unacceptable (relatively small amounts of inert materials contaminating
significant quantities of manure)
· Lack of an impermeable concrete base for the main waste store also makes
picking up the waste difficult
· Periodically, waste accumulated on the main store is set fire to, thus inducing
negative effects on the environment
· Accumulated wastes cannot be stacked high nor livestock kept out because
there are no retaining walls
· Rain water from roofed areas entering the waste stream can increase the
volumes of effluents which can pollute
· Most holdings do not have access to mechanical handling equipment such as
tractors with loaders and are limited to horse and cart
Existing commune level "platforms" already accumulated 10 to 12 years' loads of wastes,
representing real threats to the environment, through nutrient leaching, either by direct
infiltration into the watertable, or by surface runoff into canals and streams. Therefore, in
order to reduce the volume of leached nutrients, one needs to enforce a set of integrated
measures, of which the management of manure and recyclable wastes comes as one of
the first priorities.

1.7 Technological and operational description
APCP project relies on the assumption that current waste management practices must be
changed, by introducing waste segregation at household level and by encouraging
utilization of environment-friendly practices. At platform level, the design concept
includes the following:
1 Proper management of manure, involving stacking in shaped windrow heaps, 3m tall,
so that the area receiving rainfall is minimised
2 Provide impermeable walls and floor to eliminate leaching
3 Provide catchment to effluent runoff and urine (draining channel and storage tank)
4 Provide adequate security and protection fencing
5 Provide by design, sufficient storage capacity for accumulated manure (a minimum of
four months) so that matured material will be available for use on the agricultural
land; the objective should be to empty the store by the end of autumn.
The envisaged commune level waste storage and handling system would consist of:
· One rectangular shaped platform, open fronted, with reinforced concrete floor and
walls; the whole structure should be designed to withstand specific loads exerted
by the accumulated wastes, handling machinery, external forces, etc. It should be
unrestricted by internal walls so that the space needed for waste management and

6

storage can be flexible. This would also suit the requirements for composting if
this proves necessary for certain materials. An apron of concrete is provided for
the movement of machinery and the unloading of the household carts or trailers.
An effluent collection channel is provided across the full width of the front of the
platform, with a metallic grizzly screen; this collects rainfall and effluent into a
large basin to the side of the platform.
· One rectangular shaped storage basin, constructed in cut and fill, made of
reinforced concrete and positioned immediately next to the platform, designed to
collect rain water and platform effluent. It has to be able to accommodate a
volume equivalent to 30 days of mean daily rainfall; the accumulated liquid will
either be spread onto the field using a vacuum tanker or added on top of the waste
heaps inside the platform ( more frequently than the waste is spread)
· Three reinforced concrete bunkers, open fronted and of rectangular shape, for the
householders to deposit the 3 types of inert wastes: steel, glass and
plastic/cardboard; materials collected here would be emptied by a JCB (WOLA)
type mechanical loader shovel.
· One concrete access road, stretching all the way from the front gates to the
platform apron
· Security fencing, consisting of barbed wire on concrete poles
Also, for the purpose of achieving a biological filter and enhancing local landscape, a
windbreak/shelterbelt will be installed parallel to the platform fencing, using separate
funding.

2. INVESTMENT TECHNICAL DATA
2.1 Investment objective area and land tenure situation
Any such investment objective should only be constructed on public land. Areas of land
to be occupied by commune level platforms vary in size, according to the waste volumes
estimated to be generated within each community:
-
platform #1, Alexandru Odobescu commune, Alexandru Odobescu village -
area = 5,000 sq.m
-
platform #2, Alexandru Odobescu commune, Nicolae Balcescu village ­
area = 5,000 sq.m
-
platform #3, Ciocanesti commune, Smirdan village ­ area = 5,000 sq.m
-
platform #4, Ciocanesti commune, Sirbi village ­ area = 5,000 sq.m
-
platform #5, Cuza Voda commune, Cuza Voda village ­ area = 4,560 sq.m
-
platform #6, Cuza Voda commune, Ceacu village ­ area = 4,560 sq.m
-
platform #7, Gradistea commune, Gradistea village ­ area = 4,600 sq.m
-
platform #8, Gradistea commune, Rasa village ­ area = 4,600 sq.m
-
platform #9, Gradistea commune, Rasa and Bogata villages ­ area = 4,600
sq.m
-
platform #10, Independenta commune, Independenta village ­ area = 5,000
sq.m
-
platform #11, Independenta commune, Visini village ­ area = 5,000 sq.m
-
platform #12, Vilcelele commune, Vilcelele village ­ area = 8,300 sq.m
-
platform #13, Vilcelele commune, Floroaica village ­ area = 4,000 sq.m
-
platform #14, Vlad Tepes commune, Vlad Tepes village ­ area = 4,600 sq.m


7

2.2 Geomorphology of the investment location
In compliance with Romanian standard P 100/1992, the land where the investment
objective will be constructed, is classified as "D" seismic zoning category, with Ks
(seismic coefficient) = 0.16 and Tc (corner period) = 1.5 sec.
Geomorphologically speaking, the location area is part of the Southern Baragan plain,
with Danube terraces and with elevations in the range of 20 - 46 m.
Geologically, this area is part of the Moesic tableland, its structure including deposits
dating back to the mezozoic, neozoic and quaternary ages.
From the hydrogeological point of view, the primary watertable can be encountered at
depths ranging from 3 to15 m, with the general flow from WNW to ESE.

2.3 Main characteristics of structures
2.3.1 Structures to be built

The project waste management component will include the construction of 14 manure
storage platforms, situated in 7 communes within Calarasi county. Each commune level
platform (s) represents a construction objective:
Objective no.1 ­ Alexandru Odobescu commune, two platforms
Objective no.2 ­ Ciocanesti commune, two platforms
Objective no.3 ­ Cuza Voda commune, two platforms
Objective no.4 ­ Gradistea commune, three platforms
Objective no.5 ­ Independenta commune, two platforms
Objective no.6 ­ Vilcelele commune, two platforms
Objective no.7 ­ Vlad Tepes commune, one platform

2.3.2 Principal features
According to the estimated volumes of manure generated by each commune, actual
platform size may vary.
Objective no.1 ­ Alexandru Odobescu commune:
Platform:
· storage capacity = 2,400 tonnes
· length = 34.6 m
· width = 33.0 m
· wall height = 3.0 m
· collector length = 34.0 m
· apron = 34.0/6.4 m
Storage tank:
· storage capacity = 97.5 cu.m
· length = 6.5 m
· width = 10 m
· depth = 1.5 m of which 0.3 m above ground level
Bunkers for recyclable materials:
· number per platform = 3
· length of one bunker = 4.0 m
· width of one bunker = 2.5 m
· height of one bunker = 1.5 m
Access road:
· length = 26.0 m

8

· width = 6.0 m
Fencing:
· length = 233.0 m
· height = 2.0 m

Objective no.2 ­ Ciocanesti commune:
Platform:
· storage capacity = 3,700 tonnes
· length = 53.3 m
· width = 33.0 m
· wall height = 3.0 m
· collector length = 34.0 m
· apron = 34.0/6.4 m
Storage tank:
· storage capacity = 147.0 cu.m
· length = 9.8 m
· width = 10 m
· depth = 1.5 m of which 0.3 m above ground level
Bunkers for recyclable materials:
· number per platform = 3
· length of one = 4.0 m
· width of one = 2.5 m
· height of one = 1.5 m
Access road:
· length = 26.0 m
· width = 6.0 m
Fencing:
· length = 270.0 m
· height = 2.0 m

Objective no.3 ­ Cuza Voda commune:
Platform:
· storage capacity = 2,800 tonnes
· length = 40.4 m
· width = 33.0 m
· wall height = 3.0 m
· collector length = 34.0 m
· apron = 34.0/6.4 m
Storage tank:
· storage capacity = 112.5 cu.m
· length = 7.5 m
· width = 10 m
· depth = 1.5 m of which 0.3 m above ground level
Bunkers for recyclable materials:
· number per platform = 3
· length of one = 4.0 m

9

· width of one = 2.5 m
· height of one = 1.5 m
Access road:
· length = 26.0 m
· width = 6.0 m
Fencing:
· length = 245.0 m
· height = 2.0 m

Objective no.4 ­ Gradistea commune:
Platform:
· storage capacity = 4,100 tonnes
· length = 59.0 m
· width = 33.0 m
· wall height = 3.0 m
· collector length = 34.0 m
· apron = 34.0/6.4 m
Storage tank:
· storage capacity = 163.5 cu.m
· length = 10.9 m
· width = 10 m
· depth = 1.5 m of which 0.3 m above ground level
Bunkers for recyclable materials:
· number per platform = 3
· length of one = 4.0 m
· width of one = 2.5 m
· height of one = 1.5 m
Access road:
· length = 26.0 m
· width = 6.0 m
Fencing:
· length = 282.0 m
· height = 2.0 m

Objective no.5 ­ Independenta commune:
Platform:
· storage capacity = 3,200 tonnes
· length = 46.1 m
· width = 33.0 m
· wall height = 3.0 m
· collector length = 34.0 m
· apron = 34.0/6.4 m
Storage tank:
· storage capacity = 127.5 cu.m
· length = 8.5 m
· width = 10 m

10

· depth = 1.5 m of which 0.3 m above ground level
Bunkers for recyclable materials:
· number per platform = 3
· length of one = 4.0 m
· width of one = 2.5 m
· height of one = 1.5 m
Access road:
· length = 26.0 m
· width = 6.0 m
Fencing:
· length = 256.0 m
· height = 2.0 m

Objective no.6 ­ Vilcelele commune:
Platform:
· storage capacity = 3,000 tonnes
· length = 43.2 m
· width = 33.0 m
· wall height = 3.0 m
· collector length = 34.0 m
· apron = 34.0/6.4 m
Storage tank:
· storage capacity = 120.0 cu.m
· length = 8.0 m
· width = 10 m
· depth = 1.5 m of which 0.3 m above ground level
Bunkers for recyclable materials:
· number per platform = 3
· length of one = 4.0 m
· width of one = 2.5 m
· height of one = 1.5 m
Access road:
· length = 26.0 m
· width = 6.0 m
Fencing:
· length = 250.0 m
· height = 2.0 m

Objective no.7 ­ Vlad Tepes commune:
Platform:
· storage capacity = 2,600 tonnes
· length = 37.5 m
· width = 33.0 m
· wall height = 3.0 m
· collector length = 34.0 m
· apron = 34.0/6.4 m

11

Storage tank:
· storage capacity = 103.5 cu.m
· length = 6.9 m
· width = 10 m
· depth = 1.5 m of which 0.3 m above ground level
Bunkers for recyclable materials:
· number per platform = 3
· length of one = 4.0 m
· width of one = 2.5 m
· height of one = 1.5 m
Access road:
· length = 26.0 m
· width = 6.0 m
Fencing:
· length = 239.0 m
· height = 2.0 m

2.4 Structural components

2.4.1 Concrete platform

For the construction of the concrete manure storage platform (s), several preparation
operations are required, such as topsoil removal, foundation excavation, trench bottom
levelling, earthwork transport and spreading, aggregate bed laying and rolling, sealing
membrane laying, etc.
Basic works include: formwork manufacturing and installation, concrete reinforcement
rebars manufacturing and installation, foundation concrete casting, platform floor and
apron concrete casting, precast concrete units manufacturing and installation (on three
sides), concrete lining slabs and joints installation on the effluent collector, metallic
grizzly screen manufacturing and installation across the effluent collector, PVC pipe
installation at the downstream end of the collection channel.
Ancillary operations consist of : haulage of aggregates and other materials, concrete
mixing, deployment, installation and redeployment of mobile crane, etc.

2.4.2 Storage tank
Preparation works: topsoil excavation, foundation excavation, trench bottom levelling,
earthwork removal and spreading, hardcore laying and rolling, damp proof membrane
laying.
Basic operations: formwork manufacturing and installation, concrete reinforcement
rebars manufacturing and installation, foundation concrete casting, tank wall concrete
casting, special plaster works, vapour barrier casting (warm conditions), etc.
Ancillary works: haulage of aggregates and various materials, concrete mixing and
transport, manual compaction operations, provision of the outlet link to the PVC pipe
discharging the effluent from the collection channel.

2.4.3 Bunkers for segregated wastes
Preparation works: topsoil removal, foundation excavation, trench bottom levelling,
earthwork transport and spreading, hardcore laying and rolling.

12

Basic operations: concrete poles' foundation casting, poles' and precast slabs'
installation.
Ancillary works: haulage of aggregates and various materials, concrete mixing and
transport, manual compaction, provision of the outlet link to the PVC pipe that discharges
effluent from the collection channel.

2.4.4 Access roads
Preparation works: topsoil excavation, foundation excavation, trench bottom levelling,
earthwork removal and spreading, hardcore laying and rolling.
Basic operations: concrete foundation casting, laying of concrete wearing course.
Ancillary works: haulage of aggregates and materials, concrete mixing and transport.

2.4.5 Fencing
Preparation works: marking the perimeter with pegs.
Basic operations: installation of precast reinforced concrete poles and barbed wire,
installation of cast iron gates.
Ancillary works: haulage of aggregates and other materials.

2.5 Required machinery and equipment
Waste management concept involves the collection of domestic and farm wastes,
unloading them at the commune level platform, managing these wastes within the storage
platform and spreading matured manure on cultivated fields. For these purposes, the
following plant is required:
JCB/WOLA ­ type loader shovel
Type: 4 wheel drive
Loading height: 4 m
Fork capacity: 2 cu.m
Bucket capacity: 2 cu.m
Minimum engine power: 90 hp
Number required per commune: 1 for each individual platform

Waste spreader
Type: rear discharge
Capacity: 5 cu.m (largest Romanian supply)
Number required per commune: 2

Vacuum tanker
Type: vacuum
Capacity: 5,000 litres
Number required per commune: 1

Tractor
Type: 2 wheel drive
Engine power: 65 hp
Manufacturer: Tractorul Brasov
Number required per commune: 2

Trailer

13

Type: single axle tipping body
Nominal capacity: 5 tonnes
Number required per commune: 2

Waste shredder
Number required per commune: 1 for each individual platform

Costs of this plant were included under the "Design of Village-level Manure
Management Storage and Handling System" component of the APCP project.

2.6 Ancillary installations
No other installations are envisaged for the platforms at this stage.

2.7 Other infrastructure
Consolidated access roads are to be constructed in the area, using separate disbursement
sources.

3. INFORMATION ON HUMAN RESOURCES
3.1 Total staff
During the initial phase, 35 operational staff members will be required, of which:
- 14 drivers for JCB/WOLA loaders
- 7 drivers for vacuum tankers
- 14 tractor drivers

3.2 Newly created jobs
All 35 positions can be considered as newly created.























14

4. INVESTMENT COST EVALUATION

4.1 General BoQ

Approved,
Calarasi County Council President



General Bill of Quantities for Manure and Recyclable Materials Storage Platforms

Item

Name of expenditure chapter
Total value
Of which
no.
(thousand
subject to
ROL)
tendering
(thousand
ROL)
1
2 3
4
Part I
Chapter 1 ­ Land procurement and preparation expenditures
1.1 Land
procurement
- -
1.2 Land
preparation
- -
1.3 Environmental protection works including
- -
ecological reconstruction
Total Chapter 1
-
-
Chapter 2 ­ Investment ancillary infrastructure (utilities' links, networks)
2.1
-
-
Chapter 3 ­ Design and technical assistance expenditures
3.1 Field investigations, hydrogeological and
112,000
-
topographical surveys
3.2 Necessary authorizations, permits, official
10,500
-
charges and other dues
3.3 Design and engineering activities
376,000
-
3.4 Organization of contractors' tendering
170,603
-
3.5 Consultation and technical assistance, including
29,750
-
the fees for the technical supervision staff, during
the construction phase
Total Chapter 3
698,853
-
Chapter 4 ­ Investment costs
4.1 Objective no.1 ­ Alex.Odobescu commune
3,882,642
3,882,642
4.2 Objective no.2 ­ Ciocanesti commune
5,543,118
5,543,118
4.3 Objective no.3 ­ Cuza Voda commune
4,232,960
4,232,960
4.4 Objective no.4 ­ Gradistea commune
8,825,583
8,825,583
4.5 Objective no.5 ­ Independenta commune
4,736,452
4,736,452
4.6 Objective no.6 ­ Vilcelele commune
4,532,386
4,532,386
4.7 Objective no.7 ­ Vlad Tepes commune
1,962,832
1,962,832

15

Total Chapter 4
33,715,973
33,715,973
Chapter 5 ­ Other expenditures
5.1 Site mobilization
404,592
404,592
5.2 Commissions,
charges,
etc.
236,012
-
5.3 Contingencies
1,704,786
-
Total Chapter 5
2,345,390
404,592
Chapter 6 ­ Commissioning expenditures
6.1 Training of operational personnel
-
-
6.2 Technological
tests,
trials, official appraisal and
- -
commissioning
Total Part I,
36,760,216 34,120,565
of which Construction + Installation
35,825,351 34,120,565
Part II
Updated residual value of existing fixed assets which are
- -
included in the investment objective
Part III
Circulating fund required for the first production cycle
-
-
GRAND TOTAL,
36,760,216 34,120,565
of which Construction +Installation
35,825,351 34,120,565





























16




4.2 BoQs for each investment component




BILL OF QUANTITIES for Objective no. 1 ­ Alex. Odobescu commune

Item
Name of work
Cost per unit
No. of Cost per work category
no.
category
(excluding
units
(excluding VAT) in
VAT) in
thousand ROL
thousand ROL
1. Manure
storage
1,345,395 2
2,690,790
platform
2.
Effluent storage tank
142,853
2
285,706
3.
Bunkers for recyclable
30,886 2
61,772
materials
4. Access
road
57,950
2
115,900
5. Fencing
54,278
2
108,556
Total 1,631,362
2
3,262,724
VAT (19 %)
309,959
2
619,918
BoQ TOTAL, of which
1,941,321 3,882,642
2
Construction + Installation
1,941,321
3,882,642























17












BILL OF QUANTITIES for Objective no. 2 ­ Ciocanesti commune



Item
Name of work
Cost per unit
No.
Cost per work category
no.
category
(excluding
of
(excluding VAT) in
VAT) in
units
thousand ROL
thousand ROL
1. Manure
storage
1,959,519 2
3,919,038
platform
2.
Effluent storage tank
215,380
2
430,760
3.
Bunkers for recyclable
30,886 2
61,772
materials
4. Access
road

57,950
2
115,900
5. Fencing
65,306
2
130,612
Total 2,329,041
2
4,658,082
VAT (19 %)
442,518
2
885,036
BoQ TOTAL, of which
2,771,559 5,543,118
2
Construction + Installation
2,771,559
5,543,118


















18










BILL OF QUANTITIES for Objective no. 3 ­ Cuza Voda commune




Item
Name of work category
Cost per unit
No. of Cost per work
no.
(excluding VAT) in
units
category
thousand ROL
(excluding
VAT) in
thousand ROL
1.
Manure storage platform
1,468,431
2
2,936,862
2.
Effluent storage tank
164,831
2
329,662
3.
Bunkers for recyclable
30,886 2
61,772
materials
4. Access
road
57,950
2
115,900
5. Fencing
56,457
2
112,914
Total 1,778,555
2
3,557,110
VAT (19 %)
337,925
2
675,850
BoQ TOTAL, of which
2,116,480 4,232,960
2
Construction + Installation
2,116,480
4,232,960



















19








BILL OF QUANTITIES for Objective no. 4 ­ Gradistea commune



Item
Name of work category
Cost per unit
No. of Cost per work category
no.
(excluding
units
(excluding VAT) in
VAT) in
thousand ROL
thousand ROL
1.
Manure storage platform
2,080,908
3
6,242,724
2.
Effluent storage tank
239,555
3
718,665
3.
Bunkers for recyclable
30,886 3
92,658
materials
4. Access
road
57,950
3
173,850
5. Fencing
62,853
3
188,559
Total 2,472,152
3
7,416,456
VAT (19 %)
469,709
3
1,409,127
BoQ TOTAL, of which
2,941,861 8,825,583
3
Construction +Installation
2,941,861
8,825,583























20







BILL OF QUANTITIES for Objective no.5 ­ Independenta commune



Item
Name of work
Cost per unit
No. of Cost per work
no.
category
(excluding VAT) in
units
category
thousand ROL
(excluding
VAT) in
thousand ROL
1. Manure
storage
1,656,046 2
3,312,092
platform
2.
Effluent storage tank
186,809
2
373,618
3.
Bunkers for recyclable
30,886 2
61,772
materials
4. Access
road
57,950
2
115,900
5. Fencing
58,415
2
116,830
Total 1,990,106
2
3,980,212
VAT (19 %)
378,120
2
756,240
BoQ TOTAL, of which
2,368,226 4,736,452
2
Construction + Installation
2,368,226
4,736,452






















21





BILL OF QUANTITIES for Objective no.6 ­ Vilcelele commune



Item
Name of work category
Cost per unit
No. of
Cost per work
no.
(excluding
units
category (excluding
VAT) in
VAT) in thousand
thousand ROL
ROL
1.
Manure storage platform
1,582,293
2
3,164,586
2.
Effluent storage tank
175,823
2
351,646
3.
Bunkers for recyclable
30,886 2
61,772
materials
4. Access
road
57,950
2
115,900
5. Fencing
57,412
2
114,824
Total 1,904,364
2
3,808,728
VAT (19 %)
361,829
2
723,658
BoQ TOTAL, of which
2,266,193 4,532,386
2
Construction + Installation
2,266,193
4,532,386


























22



BILL OF QUANTITIES for Objective no.7 ­ Vlad Tepes commune




Item
Name of work category
Cost per unit
No. of Cost per work category
no.
(excluding
units
(excluding VAT) in
VAT) in
thousand ROL
thousand ROL
1.
Manure storage platform
1,352,571
1
1,352,571
2.
Effluent storage tank
152,576
1
152,576
3.
Bunkers for recyclable
30,886 1
30,886
materials
4. Access
road
57,950
1
57,950
5. Fencing
55,456
1
55,456
Total 1,649,439
1
1,649,439
VAT (19 %)
313,393
1
313,393
BoQ TOTAL, of which
1,962,832 1,962,832
1
Construction + Installation
1,962,832
1,962,832



























23


4.3 Financial costs

A. Financial costs, pertaining to Chapter 3 of the General BoQ

3.1 Field investigations:

- geotechnical surveys: 5,000 x 14 = 70,000 thousand ROL
- topographical surveys: 3,000 x 14 = 42,000 thousand ROL
- TOTAL = 112,000 thousand ROL

3.2 Authorizations, permits, consents, official charges and other dues to be obtained
or
incurred by the investor:
- Construction Authorization, according to provisions stipulated by Law
no.27/17.05.1994 and by Government Ordinance no.24/11.08.1991: exempted
- Other permits and consents: 3 permits x 500 x 7 = 10,500 thousand ROL
- TOTAL = 10,500 thousand ROL


3.3 Design and engineering:
Costing was done in compliance with the methodology for land planning investments'
studies and design (approved through Ordinance no.11/N/01.06.1994), accepted for the
tendering of feasibility studies (FS):
- FS = 26,000 thousand ROL
- TD + TDO + CS: 50,000 x 7 = 350,000 thousand ROL
- TOTAL = 376,000 thousand ROL

3.4 Organization of contractors' tendering:

V = 1% of the total value of works subject to tendering (Chapter 4 and paragr. 5.1)
V = 0.01 x (33,715,973 + 404,592) = 341,206 thousand ROL : 2 works per commune =
170,603 thousand ROL


TOTAL 170,603 thousand ROL


3.5 Consultation and technical assistance, including the fees for the technical
supervision staff, during the construction phase:

- technical assistance and supervision during the construction phase
would be provided by specialists of the Local Councils
- expenditures for TD and TDO verification:
- V = 8.5 % of the relevant phase design value
- V = 0.085 x 50,000 thousand ROL x 7 = 29,750 thousand ROL
- TOTAL 29,750 thousand ROL




where: TD = Technical Design; TDO = Tender Dossier; CS = Construction Specifications

24




B. Financial costs pertaining to Chapter 5 of the General BoQ


5.1 Site mobilization
For this, 1.2 % of the C + I (Chapter 4) value is allocated:
V = 0.012 x 33,715,973 = 404,592 thousand ROL
TOTAL 404,592 thousand ROL

5.2 Commissions and other charges
Commissioning of Construction + Installation works:
0.7 % of (C+I) value = 0.007 x 33,715,973 = 236,012 thousand ROL
TOTAL 236,012 thousand ROL

5.3 Contingencies
For this, 5 % of the total value of works (paragr.3.3 + paragr.3.5 + Chapter 4 ) is
allocated in accordance with Government Decision 376/08.07.1994:
V = 0.05 x (350,000 +29,750 + 33,715,973) = 1,704,786 thousand ROL
TOTAL 1,704,786 thousand ROL





























25


5. MAIN TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC INDICES

5.1 Total investment value of which construction + installation
Total investment value = 36,760,216 thousand ROL
Of which C+I = 35,825,351 thousand ROL

5.2 Investment implementation schedule, of which construction + installation
Year 2002: - total investment value = 10,502,918 thousand ROL
- of which C+I = 10,235,815 thousand ROL
Year 2003: - total investment value = 10,502,918 thousand ROL
- of which C+I = 10,235,815 thousand ROL
Year 2004: - total investment value = 10,502,918 thousand ROL
- of which C+I = 10,235,815 thousand ROL
Year 2005: - total investment value = 5,251,459 thousand ROL
- of which C+I = 5,117,907 thousand ROL

5.3 Planned duration of investment implementation
28 months (7 months per year)

5.4 Planned investment commissioning schedule
Year 2002: 4 platforms
Year 2003: 4 platforms
Year 2004: 4 platforms
Year 2005: 2 platforms

6. DISBURSEMENT SOURCES
The investment in manure storage platforms will be 50 % financed from Global
Environment Facility (GEF) funds administered by the World Bank and 50 % from the
Romanian Government.

7. NECESSARY AUTHORIZATIONS AND PERMITS
Existing:
1. Land Planning Certificate no. 123/24.11.2000 for Alexandru Odobescu commune
2. Land Planning Certificate no. 128/24.11.2000 for Ciocanesti commune
3. Land Planning Certificate no. 127/24.11.2000 for Cuza Voda commune
4. Land Planning Certificate no. 124/24.11.2000 for Gradistea commune
5. Land Planning Certificate no. 125/24.11.2000 for Independenta commune
6. Land Planning Certificate no. 129/24.11.2000 for Vilcelele commune
7. Land Planning Certificate no. 126/24.11.2000 for Vlad Tepes commune
To be obtained
8. Environmental Permit
9. Public Health Directorate Authorization
10. "Apele Romane" National Water Authority Permit
11. Authorization from the "Lower Danube Museum"




26


















DRAWINGS

27