OPERATIONAL PLAN
DEMONSTRATION SITE SUMMARY SHEET
1. SITE NAME AND GEOGRAPHIC CO-ORDINATES:
MASINLOC, ZAMBALES: 15.48 0 to 15.59 0 N latitude, 119.89 0 to 119.970 E longitude

2. COUNTRY IN WHICH THE SITE IS LOCATED: Philippines

3. STATE OR PROVINCE (SUB-NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT) IN WHICH THE SITE IS
LOCATED

Local Government Unit of Masinloc, Zambales

Local government approval (yes or no) ......... If yes then date - November 28, 2003.

Local government involvement (yes or no) .........yes

Local government co-financing (yes or no) ..... If yes then in-kind or in-cash? Both

4. LINKAGE TO NATIONAL PRIORITIES, ACTION PLANS AND PROGRAMMES:
There are several initiatives that have been made which are linked to national priorities, action plans
and programmes. It was in 1991 when the local government code was legislated under Republic Act
7061. The Republic Act 8550 and the Fisheries Code was then formulated in 1998. Both enactments
support the local governments primary role in marine sanctuary management and coastal resources
management. In 2001 the Wildlife Act under Republic Act 9147 was made for the protection of
biodiversity and regulation of bioperspectives and research in the Philippines. For the management of
marine protected areas and sanctuaries, the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) Act
and Republic Act 8435, Agriculture & Fisheries Modernization respectively have been instruments
that have been used to support activities on site. It was also in 1994 where the Oyon Bay was
declared as protected seascape thus facilitating the establishment of an environment fund. Republic
Act 8435, Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization was also established for the protection of the rights
of indigenous peoples, and also technical support especially research in the area.

Having these initiatives, the central government has been assisting the local government in making
ordinances, loans and programs creating co-financing which is given in cash and in-kind.

Masinloc, Zambales has high priority level for marine conservation particularly for molluscs,
cetaceans, turtles, whale sharks and corals as published in the Philippine Biodiversity Conservation
Priorities: A Second Iteration of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (Ong, 2002).

5. DATE OF NATIONAL TECHNICAL GROUP MEETING WHICH CONSIDERED THE
PROPOSAL AND RECOMMENDATION
1st endorsement: September 10, 2003
2nd endorsement: December 9, 2003

6. NATIONAL FOCAL POINT AND/OR NATIONAL TECHNICAL FOCAL POINT ENDORSEMENT
AND/OR COMMENTS:

Comments:

The Masinloc marine sanctuary is one of the relatively few bigger sized sanctuaries in the Philippines.
Its networking of MPAs would be a good model to demonstrate the synergistic outcome from good
practices derived from co-management arrangements and technical advice. Since Masinloc has been
considered to have high priority level in terms of marine conservation (Ong, 2002), the demonstration
site is highly endorsed and recommended to be approved and implemented.

Signature:




Name and Designation:
Dir. Gil S. Jacinto, National Technical Focal Point
Date: December 15, 2003

1

7. SITE DESCRIPTION (FULL SITE CHARACTERIZATION AS ANNEX I)

AREA
Oyon Bay, Masinloc lies between 119'52" to 119"58E longitude and 15"28"32" to 15"34"47"N latitude.
It is located in the northern part of Zambales and has an area of 7,568 hectares. The municipality
includes the island-barangay of San Salvador, located about 2.5 km away from the mainland. The
total coastline length is about 42.2 km (27.7 km on the mainland part of the municipality, 4.8 km in
northern Panglit and 9.7 km in San Salvador Island. The reef area of Masinloc Bay is 51% of the total
reef area (28.84 km2) of the whole municipality.

ENVIRONMENT

Meteorological

Masinloc, like the rest of Zambales province, falls under Type I climate, based on the modified
coronas classification of PAG-ASA. This climate is characterized by two pronounced seasons, dry
from November to May and wet during the rest of the year. Maximum rainfall is experienced during
the month of August with the presence of the southwest monsoon and occasional typhoons. The
coolest month of the year occurs during January with mean temperature of 26.6oC while the hottest
occurs during May with the mean temperature of 28.3oC (PAGASA).

Physical
The coastal waters of Masinloc are bounded on the east by a series of embayments and are exposed
to the South China Sea, sheltered only by a few islands. As a result, there is a strong gradient in
water properties (turbidity, nutrient distribution) across the shelf, which supports a variety of important
habitats. A persistent northward flow offshore is believed to contribute to the connectivity between
Masinloc and other ecosystems west of Luzon.

Geological
The demonstration site is located in the Zambales range which is about 220 km, long and 40 km wide.
The range consists of high peaks and rugged ridges notably Mt. Iba is approximately 1,606 m. and
Mt. Pinatubo which is 1,778 m. Small coastal plains and low rolling hills characterize the northern
portion of the area. The Zambales range is composed of mafic-ultramatic rocks commonly termed as
the Zambales Ultramatic Complex and is part of a complete ophiolite sequence consisting of
metamorphic peridotite, layered gabbro, diabase dike, swarms, chert and pelagic sediments known as
the Aksitero Formation.

HABITATS

Coral Reef
Coral reefs are widespread except for Oyon Bay to Collat and Southeastern San Salvador Island.
Corals in the northern transect appeared healthy (54% hard coral cover) but were less so close to the
outfall of the power plant (14% hard coral cover and less). They were also somewhat depauperate of
reef fish (7-8 MT/sq km) (ICRMP, 2003).

The present environmental state has a high live coral cover for all species (29% inside and 33%
outside the MPA. In the last decade there was minimal change in the live coral cover in the area (from
25% in 1991 to 27% in 2002) (AFMA MFR Project, 2003). The algae cover was 34% inside and 28%
outside the MPA.

Coral reefs are critical habitats for marine life as they play an important role in the productivity of the
coastal ecosystem. In Masinloc, the coral reef areas serve as important nursery and spawning areas
for a variety of commercially important fishery species. They recycle and concentrate nutrients from
the near shore open areas/seas. They also protect the coastline from erosion by wave action.

A total of 271 reef fish and reef-associated species belonging to 35 families are recorded from San
Salvador. The number of coral reef fish was 79/249 (number of genera/number of species) with coral
reef fish density of 13 reef fishes per 114 ha. The general fish biomass estimates fall within the
medium category (i.e., within the range of 10-20 mT/km2) (Arceo et al 2003) from the classification
estimate established for the country (see Naņola et al., 2002).

2

Seagrass
The study noted that seagrass beds are dominated by the genera - Thalassia, Enhalus, and
Halophila
. The seagrass abound in the mudflats and shallow areas along the coasts of Masinloc,
Palauig, Magalawa, San Salvador, San Miguel and Panglit islands. Patches of seagrass (Enhalus sp.)
were observed in the inner bay west of San Slavador Island and South of the Poblacion. A total of
eight segrass species have been reported from the Oyon Bay-Bani Point area (EIA, 1994).
Seagrass beds are important coastal resources. Similar to mangroves and coral reefs, they are also
part of a critical habitat for marine life. Seagrass transplanting is one approach to its restoration and
has been tested in the area.
Mangroves
Masinloc has 261 hectares in good condition. The areas are dominated by mangrove species such as
Rhizphora apiculata, Avicennia alba and A. officinalis. Nipa and bakauan are located in small patches.
Mangroves have an important role as breeding area for marine organisms. The forests provide food
and shelter providing protection of the coastline against erosion. Regulation of or prohibition of
harvesting of mangrove is an important step in protecting the forests.
Marine Biodiversity
Masinloc, Zambales is biologically diverse. It has a considerable number of Scleractinian coral
species, reef fishes and alga. Nearly 40% (24 genera) of the total recorded in the South China Sea
region is found in Masinloc. Live coral cover shows at least 10% increase over the decade (1999-
2002). There are 45 families of reef fishes identified in the area with 139 genera and 390 species
recorded, which is 60% of the total recorded in the national reef fish visual census database. Coral
reef fish density ranges from 1560-13680 per hectare. Reef fishes can be considered over-exploited
because of the rampant illegal activities in the area. There are 59 genera of algae with 110 species
observed. In 2002, the present algal cover inside the MPA was 34% and 28% outside the MPA
(AFMA-MFR Project).
IUCN Red Listed endangered marine turtles Chelonia mydas and Erethmochelys imbricata have been
reported to nest in the sandy shores of Masinloc. In 1993, it has been nationally recognized to have a
managed resource protected area (IUCN Category). Masinloc, Zambales is recognized as a priority
area for the marine conservation for cetaceans, whale sharks and turtles (Ong et al., 2002).
PRESENT USE
Mining
Masinloc is a town found on an area with huge deposits of chromite in its mountains. A mining
company, BCI-Coto in Masinloc is now operating a property used to export monthly an average of 1-
1.5 million pesos worth of chromite ore, mined from what is known to be the biggest deposit of
refractory ore in the world. Accounting for the bigger volume of shipping done here, as compared to
that handled at San Fernando, La Union, Masinloc was declared a port of entry
(www.zambales.gov.ph/about.html).
Status of the Fishery and Aquatic Resources
The municipality shares almost an equal market leadership position with Sta. Cruz in terms of number
of commercial and municipal fishing vessels operating in the area. Masinloc can be developed as a
fishing port or fish production and/or processing area. Fishing is the primary source of income for
about 29% of households in Masinloc. The inshore and near shore fisheries employ 1,750 fishermen.
There are 490 motorized fishing vessels, 255 non-motorized fishing vessels and 20 commercial
fishing vessels that employ at least 30 crew per fishing vessel. Fish production of tuna, skipjack,
roundscad, dolphin, Spanish mackerel and sharks recorded 4,050 m tons in 1998 valued at
approximately P202.5 million. There are two (2) existing ice plants in the area with 10.0 tons daily
product in capacity.
Commercial/municipal fishing is the primary source of livelihood of 29% of household in Masinloc.
There are three (3) existing piers/wharves in the area (NAPOCOR, Benguet Corporation and Matalvis
Fish Port) which highlights the potential of the area as a port municipality.
The municipal waters of Masinloc have abundant marine species such as yellow fin (tuna), skipjack
(roundscud), squid, octopus, lapu-lapu, sea urchin, sea cucumber, Spanish mackerel, seaweed, and
other marine species that command high market values.

3

Transportation
The Masinloc Bay is near the international sea-lanes, with good deep seabed suitable for cargo ships
(at least 18 meters deep).

MANAGEMENT REGIME

Masinloc has a 127 has Marine Sanctuary Project (San Salvador Island). In 1988, the LGU in
collaboration with an NGO (Haribon Foundation Inc.) and the community established a Marine
Sanctuary/Marine Reservation in San Salvador, covering an area of 127.5 hectares or 1.69% of the
total 7560 hectares Oyon Bay, Masinloc. A percentage of non-contiguous areas were declared as
marine reservation where limited fishing was allowed. The establishment of a sanctuary and
reservation were crucial for regulating the fishing industry in Masinloc. These protected areas
guaranteed the sustained replenishment and regeneration of the marine resources that were in
danger of being over exploited past sustainable levels.

Institutions involved in environment and natural resources management in general, and coastal
management and marine biodiversity conservation in particular include national government agencies
(NGAs), local government units (LGUs) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). They operate
from the national down to the village levels. Aside from the Philippine Council for Sustainable
Development (PCSD), the most prominent agencies at the national level are the DA, the DENR, and
the Philippine National Police (PNP)-Maritime. For the LGUs, the relevant units include the offices
handling functions related to planning, agriculture and the environment. NGOs/POs are now playing
active roles in Coastal Resources Management (CRM). Among these key NGOs/POs are Samahang
Pangkaunlaran ng San Salvador and the Nagkakaisang Mamamayan ng Mangingisda sa Bani.

Institutional arrangements in Masinloc regarding coastal resources management (that covers coral
reef management and marine bio-diversity conservation) are still labelled as `loose'. There are no
clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Although the agencies tend to coordinate their efforts, the
coordination activities are largely informal. In some ways, the relationships that are being established
are more inter-personal, rather than institutional.

8. STAKEHOLDERS: (Stakeholder involvement plan as Annex II)

The Local Government Unit
The LGU Masinloc is one of 832 coastal municipalities in the Philippines. Eleven of its thirteen
barangays are located along the Oyon Bay, Masinloc, where some 1,850 marginal fisher folk live and
depend on its marine resources. People's initiatives to rehabilitate and protect the remaining coastal
ecosystem were manifested in the LGU's project i.e., the San Salvador Marine Conservation Project
and the project partnership for mangrove reforestation activities with an NGO based in Masinloc.
Subsequently LGU ­ Masinloc has been recognized as champion of the environment for having won
the 1996 "Galing Pook Award" through the Marine Conservation Project in San Salvador Island
(MCPSSI).

The Samahang Pangkaunlaran ng San Salvador (SPSS)
The SPSS is a People's Organization in the island of San Salvador, a group recognized as coastal
environmentally oriented citizens. They are considered to be coastal dwellers dependent generally on
fishing for their livelihood and subsistence. The SPSS is also in charge in the management of the
existing marine fish sanctuary in the area.

The Bantay Dagat Volunteers
Fifty (50) deputized Bantay Dagat Volunteers in Masinloc were tasked to enforce the implementation
of RA 8550 otherwise known as Philippine Fishery Code and the local Fishery Ordinances within the
7,560-hectare Masinloc municipal waters.

The Nagkakaisang Mamamayan para sa Kalikasan ng Bani (NMKB)
The NMKB is a non-stock, non-profit association whose aim is to have a community of small fishers,
who will sustainably protect, manage and enrich the coastal areas/seas to respond to the needs of the
organization, the community and future generations.




4

The National Power Corporation ­ NPC- Masinloc Coal Fired Thermal Power Plant (MCFTPP)
NPC recognizes society's expectation of their social responsibility. It adheres to the conditionalities of
the Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) issued by the DENR and the guidelines as stipulated
in the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) ACT thereby proclaiming the 7650
hectares Oyon Bay, Masinloc as protected Seascape. NPC prepares and implements the coastal
area management plan for Oyon Bay. This plan provides a course of action for the management of
the coastal area around the MCFTPP thus ensuring environmentally sustainable use and
development of coastal resources of Oyon Bay. Also in compliance to the ECC conditionalities a
Multi-Partite Monitoring Committee (MPMC) was created by virtue of Resolution No. 05-94 of the
Sangguniang Bayan of Masinloc on January 24, 1994. The MPMC was primarily aimed at monitoring
the compliance of the NPC to the ECC conditions and stipulations and to address the social and
environmental concerns of the residents of Masinloc.

The Migrants
The physical configuration of the municipality of Masinloc makes the municipality open for in-migration
especially from the Visayas and other areas. Thus, different languages and dialects are spoken in
Masinloc. Locals blame transient migrants for the deteriorating condition of their coastal resources.
The use of illegal methods of fishing, especially sodium cyanide in the live fish industry, is attributed to
the transient fishermen.

9. THREATS: (Full causal chain analysis as Annex III)

The major threats to coral reefs in the municipality are unsustainable fishing practices, crown of
thorns outbreaks, visitor trampling and anchor damage. Rampant use of cyanide in the live reef fish
industry, blast fishing, non-selective fishing of juvenile or sexually mature target species, and
encroachment of commercial fishers into municipal waters remain prevalent. The use of cyanide and
non-selective fishing are considered to be the most critical threats because of the geographic extent
and intensity of operations. An apparent decrease of fish harvest (33%) within the vicinities was
perceived to be due to poison fishing, blast fishing and poaching and siltation from massive land use
are also of concern.

The operations of four (4) major industrial firms in the area: Benguet Corporation's chromite
operation, C-square mining Petron Oil Depot Bulk Plant and the Masinloc Coal-Fired Thermal Power
Plant, are considered as contributory factors to the degradation of the coastal environment. The coal-
fired plant consists of two (2) units producing a combined 600 MW of electricity.

Pollution and possible damage to the marine resources might be due to the condensing process,
circulating water (or cooling water) is pumped through condenser tubes to absorb the heat content of
the exhaust steam. The heated seawater flows into the discharge canal going into the Oyon Bay.
Thus, the MCFTPP operations might possibly damage the coral reefs areas within the vicinity of the
plant.

Lack of waste disposal/management system and the settlements for the residents of Matalviz, who
are coastal dwellers and depends largely on fishing as their primary source of livelihood and
subsistence may pose a threat of coastal pollution in the area. 80% of the dwellers do not have
toilets, which may provide adverse impacts on waste disposal.

The root cause under IEC is the poor understanding and awareness of environmental concerns of the
coastal communities and other organizations that uses the resources. Poor understanding about the
significance of the coral reefs prompted activities (may it be industrial and domestic) such as pollution
and over-fishing. Lack of alternative livelihood is one of the reasons of over-fishing where fishermen
resort to illegal fishing and destructive activities (e.g., blast/sodium cyanide). Inadequate coordination
of concerned management bodies is also identified as a problem in Masinloc, Zambales. This
inadequacy directed to mangrove destruction (e.g., deforestation and illegal cutting) and other illegal
activities that lead to coral reef degradation and fisheries decline. Under the capacity building, low
capability of institutions to implement coastal resource management (CRM) creates ecosystem
instability from accident oil spills and sudden changes in the environment (e.g., El Niņo effect). Lastly,
restocking and rehabilitation activities were not successful in the area. The root cause of the problem
identified is the poor economic conditions of the coastal communities pushing them to over-fish the
area.

5

Five interventions were identified in the causal chain analysis (Annex III) which will promote a
decreqse in coral reef degradation and fisheries, (1) information and education campaign (IEC), (2)
Livelihood alternative, (3) management and coordination, (4) capacity building and (5) restocking and
rehabilitation.
10. GOALS AND PURPOSE:
The main goal of the project is to sustain and promote co-management of marine sanctuaries that will
help the coastal community. The livelihood opportunities that will be established and implemented are
targeted to serve as incentives for reef stewardship.
11. RATIONALE:
Masinloc, Zambales is one of the 832 coastal municipalities in the Philippines. Eleven out of 13
barangays are located along the Oyon Bay, Masinloc, where some 1,850 marginal fisherfolks live and
depend on its marine resources. The Oyon Bay, Masinloc accounted to 7,560 hectares. The
deteriorating state of the bay's marine resources is apparent in the decrease in fish catch of fishers.
Official catch statistics showing reduction from landings of 1,500 tons in 1990 to 90 metric tons in
1992 should be treated with caution since some of the sites that were monitored in 1990 were not
monitored back in 1992. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) survey reports
in 1994 indicate that 37% of the coral reefs in the area are in poor condition. In order to reverse the
deteriorating state of the Oyon Bay, Masinloc, the LGU and the community in collaboration with
NGOs/POs have jointly established and managed a 127.5 hectares marine sanctuary. A co-
management arrangement with DENR was formalized through the Executive Order Proclamation of
the whole Oyon Bay, Masinloc as a Protected Seascape. Pursuant to the NIPAS ACT and the local
government code. This project proposal will demonstrate the enhancement of conditions of the coral
reefs in the municipality through adaptive co-management and community ­based CRM.
OBJECTIVES: Specifically the projects aims to:
A. To demonstrate sustainable community-based marine sanctuaries network.

· To develop adaptive management strategies and coordination through monitoring and
performance MPA networks;

·
To enhance coral reef and their adjacent mangrove areas;

·
To regulate and manage reef uses in surrounding reef areas.
B. To help build local co-management capacities and strengthen law enforcement capabilities of
Bantay dagat (sea wardens) personnel together with the establishment of cooperative
coordination systems.
C. To conduct and implement livelihood support mechanisms by determining the potential alternative
and/or supplemental livelihood options and establishing appropriate guidelines/policies for reef
stewardship.
D. To conduct Information Education Campaign in order to develop public awareness about
environmental issues and concerns through the production of brochures and posters of coastal
resources of Masinloc, Zamables and broadcasting knowledge on radio station.
12. OUTCOMES:
1. Enhanced sustainability of coral reef adaptive co-management with the government and
community-based stakeholders as seen in the implementation and their adjustment in the
implementation of management plans, the performance of management bodies with regular
allocation budget.
2. Maintained health of reefs and their associated ecological goods and services based on
participatory impact monitoring and evaluation.
3. Improved quality life of fisher stakeholders as indicated by an increase in supplemental incomes
derived from reef stewardship.
4. Strengthened capacity of governing bodies and stakeholder stewardship as seen in compliance of
policies and good monitoring and evaluation practices (e.g., participatory performance).

6


13. PLANNED ACTIVITIES TO ACHIEVE OUTCOMES

(Monitoring and evaluation plan as Annex IV)

Component 1. Demonstrating sustainable community-based marine sanctuaries network
Comparative day to day operations involving the establishment of the marine sanctuary including the
orientation and training activities (e.g., monitoring and evaluation, restocking of giant clams and sea
urchin, coral reef and mangrove rehabilitation). Consultation meetings with PAMB, fisher communities
and other stakeholders will be coordinated. With the assistance of consultants biophysical monitoring
activities inside and outside (adjacent) the community-based marine sanctuary will be conducted.
Socio-economic costs and benefits derived from marine sanctuary co-management will be evaluated.
Initial appraisal and detailed benchmarking assessment of the 2 potential additional marine
sanctuaries will also be conducted along with public hearings and community consultations as part of
management planning and implementation process. Reef fishery and licensing system will also be
established and implemented as a mechanism for regulation, information gathering and fisheries
management. The fisherfolks will be trained on proper restocking and grow-out methods of marine
species such as the giant clams, sea urchins and coral transplantation. Mangrove planting will also be
implemented during the project period.

1.1 Monitoring of coral and reef fish abundance inside and outside the sanctuary

1.2 Construction of a rudimentary jetty for monitoring, eco-tourism and navigational purposes

1.3 Initial benchmark assessment of two additional marine sanctuaries/reserves

1.4 Detailed assessment of two (2) additional marine sanctuaries and subsequent participatory
monitoring

1.5 Install mooring buoys for sanctuaries and navigation markers

1.6 Improving coordinating mechanisms for a network of marine sanctuaries and functional
patrolling

1.7 Reef Fishery and licensing establishment and implementation and degree of compliance

1.8 Training on restocking and grow-out methods (e.g. giant clams, sea urchin)

1.9 Training on coral reef rehabilitation methods (e.g. coral transplantation) and implement
transplantation
Component 2. Capacity Building
Consultants will undertake orientation and training workshops for crucial stakeholders on the
improvement of the proposed network of MPAs. The exchange between the demonstration sites will
be promoted by attending MPA network meetings at different adjacent sites. Consultation meetings
with the MPA network and advocates will also be conducted. People's Organization will be
subcontracted to conduct orientation and training for skills development and promote team building for
various marine sanctuary management teams. The Bantay Dagat (sea wardens) personnel will
undertake legal and paralegal training. Implementation of Information Education Campaign (IEC) will
complement law enforcement operations and the capabilities of the Bantay Dagat. Participatory
impact evaluation together with performance monitoring and incentive system will be formulated.
Public consultation meetings in the community together with the private sector (e.g., National Power
Corporation) will be undertaken to forge private-public partnerships together with the local
government and National Government Agencies (NGAs).

2.1 Team building efforts for various marine sanctuary management teams

2.2 Legal and paralegal training of Bantay dagat personnel

2.3 Strengthen law enforcement capabilities of Bantay dagat (sea wardens) personnel

Component 3. Supplemental livelihood linked to the stewardship of the marine sanctuary

Activities that supplement income without compromising the resource base will serve as an incentive
for reef stewardship. Initial assessment (scanning and feasibility studies) of the potential alternative
livelihood options in the community will be conducted. Pilot implementation of prioritized livelihood
after training of fisher stewards in the sanctuaries.
3.1 Determination of potential alternative and/or supplemental livelihood options and
appropriate guidelines/policies on its implementation

3.2 Implementation of livelihood projects through priority marine sanctuary stewards

3.3 Establishment of marine sanctuary fund

3.4 Establishment of the report card and incentive system

7

Component 4. Information Education Campaign
Aside from basic awareness campaigns, education and training materials will be packaged for related
coral reef management activities. Brochures, posters, notice boards and videos of the coastal
resources of Masinloc, Zambales will be distributed to the public including the local middle school.

4.1 Production of brochures and posters on the coastal resources of Masinloc, Zambales and
4.2 Install permanent notice boards for raising awareness on coral reefs and their
announcements

4.3 Radiobroadcast of information on the coral reef ecosystem and appropriate management
actions being undertaken

4.4 Prepare middle school curricula on coral reef ecological management

4.5 Meetings of Protected Area Management Board (PAMB) and Strategic Action Plan for
Masinloc

4.6 Publication of the reports

14. SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSES AND RISK ASSESSMENT


Sustainability
Sustainability criteria will be based on at least three interrelated multiple areas in the biophysical,
legal, institutional and financial aspects. The biophysical sustainability criteria should imply that critical
threats are effectively stopped (e.g., destructive and illegal fishing practices and result in improvement
of the ecosystem state e.g., increase in fish abundance and coral cover.

The legal and institutional arrangements are considered sustainable when inter-hierarchical
complementation is achieved at the village level, provincial and national level indicated by legitimized
plans, formal agreements and functional cooperative arrangements such as regular meetings held
and functional management criteria are continued by multisectoral bodies through the establishment
of various accountable management bodies that practice good governance procedures.

In addition, the establishment of MPA network in coordination with the CRM council and national
government agency will incorporate these strategies and action plan in the provincial, regional and
national medium-term development plan (MTDP).

Financial sustainability would be achieved if a regularized budget of at least $1000/year is provided
for each marine sanctuary by the local government to support the village level stewardship. A budget
of $10000 annually provided by the local government to the Coastal Resource Management (CRM)
office to support FARMC activities. A budget of $2500 for Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) and
Performance Management Plan (PMP) and multisectoral fund established jointly by government and
other stakeholders with at least $5000 annually.

These funds in conjunction with the livelihood repayments and IRA will be plowed back through a
regularized budget from CRM activities and monitoring.

Financial sustainability

Energy Regulation Act No. 1-94 of the Department of Energy (NPC)
Provides funding equivalent to 35% municipal share for the implementation of the Reforestation
Watershed Management, Health and Environment Enhancement Projects for the municipality of
Masinloc.

Provides financial and technical assistance in the implementation of environmental related projects
particularly the development of coastal resources management through the formulation of the Multi-
Partite Monitoring Group/Committee, which primarily aimed at monitoring the compliance of the NPC
to the ECC conditions and stipulations and to address the social and environmental concerns of the
residents of Masinloc.

Local Government Unit (LGU) ­ General Fund
LGU provides annual budget allocation for the monthly honoraria of the Bantay Dagat Volunteers,
Gasoline expenses, patrol boats with complete paraphernalia and other related expenses to be used
in the implementation of RA 8550 and in the monitoring and apprehending of illegal fishing activities.


8

20% Municipal Development Fund ­ Municipal Development Council (MDC)
MDC provides annual budget allocation worth 7.5 M or two (2%) percent of the twenty (20%) for the
Coastal Resources Management Projects.

Institutional Sustainability
The integration of co-management arrangements and establishment of MPA networks enhances the
institutional support systems at the local (e.g., provincial) and national levels.

The institutionalization of environmental trust funds with counterpart from private conditional grants
has been incorporated into the marine conservation contracts. Enhanced participation and
engagement of local communities, as part of local and national benefit sharing of roles and
responsibilities would have been instituted. These policies helps in facilitating transparency,
accountability and participatory decision making as integrated within their management plans,
legislated policies and budgets.

Risks

The risks of rural impoverished fishing communities lie in the development of early stages of
management institutions and the social and economic instability of local communities.

The project assumes that the macroeconomic (e.g., energy sharing schemes of local vs. national) and
political conditions do not overcome the internal outcomes derived from the project. In order to buffer
against these risks the legislative reforms to be instituted in the policy agenda of the strategic action
plans on-site and for the region should incorporate these constraints in the expected outcomes.
Political and financial leveraging of commitments through the demonstration site and national
accountability of local and national government would add to the supporting structures to avoid the
unsustainable impacts of these risks. MPA networks and other coordinating bodies should minimize
transactional costs and provide avenues for conflict resolution concerns.

15. ESTIMATED BUDGET: (Details in Annexes V.1 and V.2)

Total estimated budget of the demonstration site project: US$ 373,950, including:

GEF funding:

$118,000 USD
Government co-funding in kind: $ 8,100
Government co-funding in cash: $247,850

9

15.1
Summary Budget by Activities (Details described in Annex V.1)


Co-funding
Activities
GEF
Total

in-kind in-cash
1.1
Marine sanctuary network orientation workshop
2,350

2,130
4,480
1.2
CRM Planning Workshop
3,150

0
3,150
1.3
Detailed assessment of two (2) additional marine
8,050
9,050
17,100
sanctuaries
1.4
Monitoring of coral and reef fish inside and outside the
4,380
8,760
17,460
sanctuary
1.5
Training on reseeding and grow-out methods (e.g. giant
1,280
3,000
4,280
clams, sea urchin and abalone)
1.6
Implementation of reseeding and grow-out methods of
11,160
3,600
14,760
sea urchins
1.7
Reef Fishery and licensing establishment and
1,450


1,450
implementation
1.8
Coral Reef rehabilitation
2,680

4,050
6,730
1.9
Initial assessment of potential additional marine
2,000
5,300

7,300
sanctuaries/reserves
1.10 Establishment of marine sanctuary fund
1,500


1,500
2.1 Patrolling
activities
3,670
4,320 7,990
2.2
Strengthen law enforcement capabilities of Bantay dagat
1,500

1,500
(sea wardens) personnel
3.1
Orientation workshop in determination of potential
3,300
1,800
7,500
alternative livelihood options and appropriate
guidelines/policies on its implementation
3.2
Training of the potential alternative livelihood options
2,700

1,640
2,700
3.3
Implementation of livelihood projects
11,700

174,000 184,500
4.1 Trainings
600

600 600
4.2 Material
development
3,000
6,000 9,000
4.3 Public
awareness
1,000
1,000
0 2,000
5.1
Demonstration site manager (one person @ 30 @ 690$)
20,700

20,700
5.2
Counterpart of management body and expenses for the
0

9,000
9,000
venue (2.5 years @ 3000 US$)
5.3
Technical assistant to the demonstration site manager
5,430


5,430
(one technical assistant @ 30 months @181 US$)
5.4
Travel on official business (2 perons @ 3 trips @ 3
2,200

2,200
4,400
years @ $110; 2 perons @ 3 trips @ 2.5 years @ $110)
5.5
Travel of the Focal Point to the demonstration site (one
3,000


3,000
person @ 12 trips @ 1 year @ 2.5 years @ 100 US$)
5.6
Meetings of Management Board
2,100

4,500
6,600
5.7
Monitoring and evaluation of the project
9,000


9,000
5.8
Office non-expendable equipment
4,700


4,700
5.9
Office expendable supplies
1,200


1,200
5.10 Operation and maintenance of office ($500 @
15,000
15,000
30months)
5.11 Communication

2,100

2,100
5.12 Audit expenses 30 months
2,100


2,100

Total 118,000
8,100
247,850
373,950




10

15.2 Summary Budget by Object of expenditure (Details described in Annex V.2).

Object of expenditure
GEF
Co-funding
Total
Budget in $US
In-cash
In-kind
1000 Project Personnel Component
36,800
15,700
0
52,500
1100 Project personnel
26,130
9,000

35,130
1200 Consultant
5,470
4,500

9,970
1600 Travel on official business
5,200
2,200

7,400
2000 Sub-contract component
36,970
195,860
7,100
239,930
2200 Subcontract component
36,970
195,860
7,100
239,930
3000 Training Component
15,850
21,290
1,000
38,140
3200 Group training
15,250
16,190
1,000
32,440
3300 Meeting/conference
600
5,100
0
5,700
4000 Equipment Component
17,280
15,000
0
32,280
4100 Expendable Equipment
9,720


9,720
4200 Non-expendable equipment
7,560


7,560
4300 Premises
0
15,000

15,000
5000 Miscellaneous Component
11,100
0
0
11,100
5200 Reporting Costs
9,000

0
9,000
5300 Sundry
2,100
0
0
2,100
Grand Total
118,000
247,850
8,100
373,950

16.
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN:
2005 2006
2007
Activities
3rd 4th 1st 2nd
3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
1
Demonstrating sustainable community-based marine sanctuaries network
1.1
Marine sanctuary network orientation workshop
Subcontract consultants for marine sanctuary
network orientation on the framework of marine
1.1.1


X







sanctuary network and planning meeting (2 days x
$70 @ 2 consultants @ 3 sites)
Conduct orientation workshop (2 days x 54
1.1.2


X







participants x $5/day)
Consultations of concerned stakeholders in the
1.1.3 MPA network (at least 6 representative from 9


X







villages) (54 participants x $30)
1.2
CRM
planning
workshop

Undertake CRM planning workshops for integration
1.2.1
X X X
(15 participants x $30 per year)
Updated CRM and MPA network action plan report
1.2.2
X X
by consultant (3 days x $300/day x 2 periods)
Detailed assessment of two (2) additional marine
1.3










sanctuaries
Convene public consultations and hearings (50
1.3.1

X








participants x $5/day x 3 days)
Initial assessment of potential additional marine
1.3.2 sanctuaries/ reserves (3 persons @ 10 days @


X







$100)
1.3.3 Boat rental (10 days)


X







Assign Consultants to design and undertake
benchmarking of coral and reef fish, submit report
1.3.4 to local gov't. of Masinloc and Coral Reef


X







Management Committee (2 consultants x $200/day
x 5 days)

11

2005 2006
2007
Activities
3rd 4th 1st 2nd
3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Install mooring buoys for sanctuaries and
1.3.5
X


navigation markers (45 buoys @ $35)
Assign contractor to design, install and maintain
1.3.6 mooring buoys at appropriate areas ($10 @ 15
X


days @ 10 persons)
1.3.7 Boat rental (15 days)
X
Monitoring of coral and reef fish inside and outside
1.4










the sanctuary
Subcontract for monitoring activities and prepare
1.4.1
X X X
reports (2 persons x $200 x 5 days/year)
1.4.2 Boat rental (15 days)
X X X
Training on reseeding and grow-out methods (e.g.
1.5










giant clams, sea urchin and abalone)
1.5.1 Participants cost (10 participants @ 5 days @ 10)


X







1.5.3 Boat Rental (5 days)



X






Assign resource speakers for the training (2
1.5.4
X
speakers x $100/day x 5 days)
Implementation of reseeding and grow-out
1.6










methods of giant clams, sea urchin and abalone
Purchase of giant clams, sea urchin and abalone
1.6.1 $30 @ 200 @ 3 sites; 8 @ 500 @ sites; 1.2 @
X
2000 @ 3 sites; 1.2 @ 2000 @ 3 sites
Pilot restocking activities in marine sanctuaries
1.6.2
X
(e.g. giant clams, sea urchin)
1.6.3 Boat rental (15 days @ $36)




X





Reef Fishery and licensing establishment and
1.7










implementation
Assign consultants to establish and implement
1.7.1 Reef Fishery and Licensing system (5 x $130 per
X X

X
year)
Registration and renewal (5 survey technicians x
1.7.2
X X

X
$30 per year)
1.8
Coral
Reef
rehabilitation

Assign resource speakers for the training (2
1.8.2
X
speakers x $100/day x 5 days)
Conduct training on coral reef rehabilitation
1.8.3
X
methods (10 participants x 5 days x $40/day)
1.8.1 Boat rental (5 days @
$36)
X
Construction of a jetty for monitoring, eco-tourism
1.9










and navigational purposes
Assign contractors to design and construct a small
1.9.1


X







jetty (~50 meters)
1.10 Mangrove rehabilitation, protection & maintenance










Assign contractors for rehabilitation and
1.10.1
X X X
management of mangroves (10 ha)
Initial assessment of potential additional marine
1.11










sanctuaries/reserves
Subcontract to train, design and undertake
Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment
1.11.1

X








(PCRA), and prepare report (2 persons x $200/day
x 5 days)
1.12 Establishment of marine sanctuary
fund

Assign finance and fund management specialist for
scanning and cost revenue analyses, set-up
1.12.1
X

X X
business and sustainable financing plan (5 days x
$130/day per year)
2 Capacity
building

2.1
Patrolling
activities

Contract people's organization to conduct training
2.1.1 on enforcement skill activities (20 participants x

X
$25/day x 3 days)

12

2005 2006
2007
Activities
3rd 4th 1st 2nd
3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Conduct patrolling activities (2 persons @ $10 @ 4
2.1.3
X X X X X X X X X X
week @ 36 months)
2.1.7 Boat rental for patrolling (144 days @ 30 months)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2.1.4 Communication equipment such as handheld radio
X









2.1.5
Purchase
2
binoculars
X
2.1.6
Patrol
light
(superlight)
X
2.1.9 mask and snorkel (10 sets)
X









Strengthen law enforcement capabilities of Bantay
2.2










dagat (sea wardens) personnel
Training course on legislation (2 per year @ 50
2.2.1
X



X X
participants @ $5/day)
3
Supplemental livelihood linked to the stewardship of the marine sanctuary





Orientation workshop in determination of potential
3.1
alternative livelihood options and appropriate










guidelines/policies on its implementation
Assign contractors to conduct training for livelihood
3.1.1
X
option/s (20 participants x $25/day x 3 days)
Subcontract to assess supplemental and
complementary livelihood options and conduct
3.1.2
X
alternative livelihood training for fishermen (5-day
training)
Training of the potential alternative livelihood
3.2










options
Conduct training on supplemental and
3.2.1 complementary livelihood and stewardship for
X
fishermen (10 participants x 5 days x $40/day)
Conduct training on business management (20
3.2.2
X
participants x $25/day x 3 days)
3.3
Implementation of livelihood projects










Contract livelihood centers to implement livelihood
3.3.1 projects (60 households @ $300; 580 households
X X X X X
@ $ 300)
Subcontract product development and ecolabeling
3.3.2


X X
(market study and product development)
4
Information and Education Campaign










4.1 Trainings







Conduct of consultation meetings for public
4.1.1
X
X
X
awareness (2 per year @ 50 participants x $5/day)
4.2
Material
development

Assign contractors to design and produce
4.2.1


X







brochures and posters (1000 copies each)
Assign contractors to make bulletin boards e.g.,
4.2.2 fisheries administrative ordinances etc. (5 notice
X




boards @ $400; 15 notice boards @ $400)
Assign contractors to produce a ten minute video
4.3.1. on "Masinloc Experience" for schools in Masinloc,
X
Zambales (100 VCDs to be given to schools)
4.3.

Public
awareness

Subcontract radio staion to broadcast knowledge
4.3.2.
X X X X X X X X X X
of coral reef ecosystem on local radio
5
Project Management and Administration










Demonstration site manager (one person @ 30 @
5.1
X X X X X X X X X X
750 US $)
Counterpart of management body and expenses
5.2
X X X X X X X X X X
for the venue (30 months @ $300)
Technical assistant to the demonstration site
5.3
manager (one technical assistant @ 30 months
X X X X X X X X X X
@250 US $)
Travel on official business (2 perons @ 10 trips
5.4

X X X X X
@110 US $)
Travel of the Focal Point to the demonstration site
5.5
X X X X X X X X X X
(one person @ 30 months @ $120)

13

2005 2006
2007
Activities
3rd 4th 1st 2nd
3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
5.6
Meetings of Management Board










Transportation and hotel for the participants (5
5.6.1
X X X X
meetings @ 15 pax @ 4 days @ $30)
Co-funding from participation of the management
5.6.2 board meeting (15 participants @ 3 days @ 5
X X X X X
meetings @ 2 meetings @ $30)
5.7
Monitoring and evaluation of the project




X



X
X
5.8 Office
non-expendable equipment










5.8.1 One (1) LCD Projector
X









5.8.2 One (1) Notebook computer with accessories
X









5.8.3 One (1) Desktop computer
X









5.8.4 One (1) printer
X









5.8.5 One (1) Digital camera
X









5.8.6 One (1) Underwater housing (for camera)
X









5.9 Office
expendable
supplies
X X X X X X X X X X
Operation and maintenance of office 500 @ 30
5.1
X X X X X X X X X X
months
5.11
Communication


5.11.1 Telephone/Fax
X
X X X X X X X X X
5.11.2 Postage/Freight
X X X X X X X X X X
5.12 Audit
expenses
2.5
years
X

17. PROPOSED MANAGEMENT OF THE ACTIVITIES.
(Details described in Annex VI)
The Marine Science Institute, specialized executing agency will be accountable to see to it that the
activities in the demonstration site are properly implemented. In this connection, the national focal
point will check the progress of the project by visiting the demonstration site once a month until the
project ends. The national focal point is also responsible to report the progress of the demonstration
site to the Project Coordinating Unit (PCU) and Regional Working Group on Coral Reef.
The appointed demonstration site manager is responsible to execute the activities in the work plan.
This is under the direction of the Coral Reef Management Council that is composed of the PAMB,
LGUs and DENR. The demonstration site manager is also responsible to report the over-all progress
and problems encountered in the project implementation.
As proposed, two marine sanctuaries will be added adjacent to the existing one. There will be a
separate committee in-charge per sanctuary. This will aid in effectively implementing the activities in
each sanctuary.
18. INFORMATION ON PROPOSED EXECUTING AGENCY (IES) (Information on the entity(ies)
that will execute activities including their legal status).
The Marine Science Institutes' threefold mandate of research, graduate education and development
of environmentally sound technologies have shown a track record of performance and accountability
in the last 3 decades of its existence. Aside from academic excellence, it has been recognized as a
center of excellence in ecosystem research and development. In coral reef research and
management, its programs in science-based participatory and community-based management have
been seen in the catalytic and facilitative role of the Philippine Coral Information Network and the
formulation of the Philippine Marine Sanctuary Strategy. The institute has regularly performed many
technical advisory roles in the national and international bodies in the marine sciences.
19. EXECUTING AGENCY CONTACT PERSON:
___________________ Demonstration Site Manager
(To be hired)

Dr. Porfirio M. Aliņo National Focal Point for Coral Reefs
The Marine Science Institute
Velasquez St., University of the Philippines,
Diliman, Quezon City 1101
Tel : 632 9223921
Fax: 632 9247678
Email: pmalino@upmsi.ph

14

ANNEX I
SITE CHARATERISATION

1.1

Map of Masinloc, Zambales
























1.2

Site Description

Masinloc, Zambales (Figure 1) is geographically located at 15.48-15.59 degrees latitude and 119.89-
119.97 degrees longitude. It consists of various reef types such as fringing (mainland and island),
patch reefs and atoll. The present area is approximately127 ha. It is biologically diverse having live
coral cover for all species (Table 1) inside the MPA of 33.24% and 29.06% outside the MPA (AFMA-
MFR Project 2003) with algal cover (Table 3) of 34% (inside) and 28% (outside). From 1991 to 2002,
change in live coral cover for all species increased from 25 to 27%. Fish species richness (Table 2) is
high showing 97 genera and 249 species based from fish visual census observations. Abundance is
moderate ranging from 1560-13680 per hectare. Thus, it indicates that the area is moderately over-
exploited.

Seagrass and mangrove in Masinloc Bay are the interacting ecosystems with coral reef. Marine
turtles such as Chelonia mydas and Eretmochely imbricata particularly in Subic and Masinloc are
considered to be endangered and threatened species (IUCN Red List Category; Ong 2002). Medium-
term management plans had indicated that the Subic-Bataan Protected Area and Oyon Bay, Masinloc
Protected Seascape shall be part of its priority areas for conservation (Ong 2002).

In August 1993, Masinloc was declared as protected landscape/Seascape under proclamation 231.
Ecotourism and their environment fund are potential sources that can be used to develop the site
considering the significant level of direct stakeholder involvement in management.

Destructive fishing such as bombing and poisoning is the major threat in the site followed by pollution
caused by sedimentation, heavy metals, organic pollutants and eutrophication. Coastal development
from dredging and tourism and natural disasters like storm, volcanic eruption and land subsidence,
coral bleaching and infestation of Crown-of-Thorns are also noted. Industrial and mariculture
development are the potential threat in the next coming years.


15

Social and economic drives of change in environmental sites has been considered as stress-pressure
particularly with the operation of the coal fired Power Plant in 1995. Population growth within the area
is 0.21% a total municipal resident population of 569,266. There is coastal zoning and institutional
framework for MPA in Subic-Bataan Protected Area which is around 80 km away but no functional
coastal management plan for Masinloc.

AREA

Oyon Bay, Masinloc lies between 119'52" to 119"58E longitude and 15"28"32" to 15"34"47"N latitude.
It is located in the northern part of Zambales and has an area of 7,568 hectares. The municipality
includes the island-barangay of San Salvador, located about 2.5 km away from the mainland. The
total coastline length is about 42.2 km (27.7 km on the mainland part of the municipality, 4.8 km in
northern Panglit and 9.7 km in San Salvador Island. The reef area of Masinloc Bay is 51%of the total
reef area (28.84 km2) of the whole municipality.

ENVIRONMENT

Meteorological

Masinloc, like the rest of Zambales province, falls under Type I climate, based on the modified
coronas classification of PAG-ASA. This climate is characterized by two pronounced seasons, dry
from November to May and wet during the rest of the year. Maximum rainfall is experienced during
the month of August with the presence of the southwest monsoon and occasional typhoons. The
coolest month of the year occurs during January with annual mean temperature of 26.6C while the
hottest occurs during May with the mean annual temperature of 28.3C (PAGASA).

Physical
The coastal waters of Masinloc are bounded on the east by a series of embayment and are exposed
to the South China Sea, sheltered only by a few islands. As a result, there is a strong gradient in
water properties (turbidity, nutrient distribution) across the shelf, which supports a variety of important
habitats. A persistent northward flow offshore is believed to contribute to the connectivity between
Masinloc and other ecosystems west of Luzon.

Geological
The demonstration site is located in the Zambales range which is about 220 km, long and 40 km wide.
The range consists of high peaks and rugged ridges notably Mt. Iba is approximately 1,606 mas and
Mt. Pinatubo which is 1,778 mas. Small coastal plains and loe rolling hills characterize the northern
portion of the area. The Zambales range is composed of mafic-ultramatic rocks commonly termed as
the Zambales Ultramatic Comples and is part of a complete ophiolite sequence consisting of
metamorphic peridotite, layered gabbro, diabase dike, swarms, chert and pelagic sediments known as
Aksitero Formation.

HABITATS

Coral Reef
Coral reefs are widespread except for Oyon Bay to Collat and Southeastern San Salvador Island.
Corals in the northern transect appeared healthy (54% hard coral cover) but were less so close to the
outfall of the power plant (14% hard coral cover and less). They were also somewhat depauperate of
reef fish (7-8 MT/sq km) (ICRMP, 2003).

The present environmental state has a high live coral cover for all species (29% inside and 33%
outside the MPA. In the last decade there was minimal change in the live coral cover in the area (from
25% in 1991 to 27% in 2002) (AFMA MFR Project, 2003). The algae cover was 34% inside and 28%
outside the MPA.

Coral reefs are critical habitats for marine life as they play an important role in the productivity of the
coastal ecosystem. In Masinloc, the coral reef areas serve as important nursery and spawning areas
for a variety of commercially important fishery species. They recycle and concentrate nutrients from
the near shore open areas/seas. They also protect the coastline from erosion by wave action.


16

A total of 271 reef fish and reef-associated species belonging to 35 families in San Salvador. The
number of coral reef fish was 79/249 (number of genera/number of species) with coral reef fish
density of 13 reef fishes per 114 ha. The general fish biomass estimates fall within the medium
category (i.e., within the range of 10-20 mT/km2) (Arceo et al 2003) from the classification estimate
established for the country (see Naņola et al., 2002)

Seagrass
The study noted that seagrass beds are dominated by the genera - Thalassia, Enhalus, and
Halophila
. The seagrass abound in the mudflats and shallow areas along the coasts of Masinloc,
Palauig, Magalawa, San Salvador, San Miguel and Panglit islands. Patches of seagrass (Enhalus sp.)
were observed in the inner bay wast of San Slavador Island and south of the Poblacion. A total of
eight segrass species have been reported from the Oyon Bay-Bani Point area (EIA, 1994).

Seagrass beds are important coastal resources. Similar to mangroves and coral reefs, they are also
part of a critical habitat for marine life. Seagrass transplanting is one approach to its restoration and
has been tested in the area.

Mangroves
Masinloc has 261 hectares in good condition. The areas are dominated by mangrove species such
as Rhizphora apiculata, Avicennia alba and A. officinalis. Nipa and bakauan are located in small
patches. Mangroves have an important role as breeding area for marine organisms. The forests
provide food and shelter providing protection of the coastline against erosion. Regulation of or
prohibition of harvesting of mangrove is an important step in protecting the forests.

Marine Biodiversity
Masinloc, Zambales is biologically diverse. It has considerable number of Scleractinian coral species,
reef fishes and alga. Nearly 40% (24 genera) of the total recorded in the South China Sea region is
found in Masinloc. Live coral cover shows at least 10% increase over the decade (1999-2002). There
are 45 families of reef fishes identified in the area with 139 genera and 390 species recorded, which is
60% of the total recorded in the national reef fish visual census database. Coral reef fish density
range from 1560-13680 per hectare. Reef fishes remain to be considered over-exploited because of
the rampant illegal activities in the area. There are 59 genera of algae with 110 species observed. In
2002, the present algal cover inside the MPA is 34% and 28% outside the MPA (AFMA-MFR Project).

IUCN Red Listed endangered marine turtles Chelonia mydas and Erethmochelys imbricata have been
reported to nest in the sandy shores of Masinloc. In 1993, it has been nationally recognized to have a
managed resource protected area (IUCN Category). Masinloc, Zambales is recognized as priority
area for the marine conservation for cetaceans, whale sharks and turtles (Ong et al., 2002).

PRESENT USE


Mining
Masinloc is a town found on an area with huge deposits of chromite in its mountains. A mining
company, BCI-Coto in Masinloc is now operating a property used to export monthly an average of 1-
1.5 million pesos worth of chromite ore, mined from what is known to be the biggest deposit of
refractory ore in the world. Accounting of the bigger volume of shipping done here, as compared to
that handled at San Fernando, La Union, Masinloc was declared a port of entry
(www.zambales.gov.ph/about.html).

Status of the Fishery and Aquatic Resources
The municipality shares almost an equal market leadership position with Sta. Cruz in terms of number
of commercial and municipal fishing vessels operating in the area. Masinloc can be developed as a
fishing port or fish production and/or processing area. Fishing is the primary source of income for
about 29% of households in Masinloc. The inshore and near shore fisheries employ 1,750 fishermen.

There are 490 motorized fishing vessels, 255 non-motorized fishing vessels and 20 commercial
fishing vessels that employ at least 30 crew per fishing vessel. Fish production of tuna, skipjack,
roundscad, dolphin, Spanish mackerel and sharks accounted to 4,050 m tons in 1998 valued at
approximately P202.5 million. There are two (2) existing ice plants in the area with 10.0 tons
capacity.


17

Commercial/municipal fishing is the primary source of livelihood of 29% of household in Masinloc.
There are three (3) existing piers/wharves in the area (NAPOCOR, Benguet Corporation and Matalvis
Fish Port) which highlights the potential of the area as a port municipality.

The municipal waters of Masinloc has abundant marine species such as yellow fin (tuna), skipjack
(roundscud), squid, octopus, lapu-lapu, sea urchin, sea cucumber, Spanish mackerel, seaweed, and
other marine species that commands higher market values.

Transportation
The Masinloc Bay is near the international sea-lanes, with good deep seabed suitable for cargo ships
(at least 18 meters deep).

MANAGEMENT REGIME


Masinloc has a 127 has Marine Sanctuary Project (San Salvador Island). In 1988, the LGU in
collaboration with an NGO (Haribon Foundation Inc.) and the community established a Marine
Sanctuary/Marine Reservation in San Salvador, covering an area of 127.5 hectares or 1.69% of the
total 7560 hectares Oyon Bay, Masinloc. A percentage of non-contiguous areas were declared as
marine reservation where limited fishing was allowed. The establishment of a sanctuary and
reservation were crucial for regulating the fishing industry in Masinloc. These protected areas
guaranteed the sustained replenishment and regeneration of the marine resources that were in
danger of being over exploited past sustainable levels.

Institutions involved in environment and natural resources management in general, and coastal
management and marine biodiversity conservation in particular include national government agencies
(NGAs), local government units (LGUs) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). They operate
from the national down to the village levels. Aside from the Philippine Council for Sustainable
Development (PCSD), the most prominent agencies at the national level are the DA, the DENR, and
the Philippine National Police (PNP)-Maritime. For the LGUs, the relevant units include the offices
handling functions related to planning, agriculture and the environment. NGOs/POs are now playing
active roles in Coastal Resources Management (CRM). Among these key NGOs/POs are Samahang
Pangkaunlaran ng San Salvador and the Nagkakaisang Mamamayan ng Mangingisda sa Bani.

Institutional arrangements in Masinloc regarding coastal resources management (that covers coral
reef management and marine bio-diversity conservation) are still labelled as `loose'. There are no
clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Although the agencies tend to coordinate their efforts, the
coordination activities are largely informal. In some ways, the relationships that are being established
are more inter-personal, rather than institutional.

1.3
List of species


Table 1
List of coral genera in Macinloc.

Acropora Goniastrea
Astreopora

Leptastrea
Coeloseris
Leptoria
Gardineroseris
Fungia
Leptoseris
Heliofungia
Euphyllia
Lithophyllon
Caulastrea
Merulina
Cyphastrea
Hydnopora
Diploastrea
Lobophyllia
Echinopora Galaxea
Favia

Echinophyllia
Favites
Goiniopora
Source: Resource Inventory, 2001.

18

Table 2
List of coral reef fish in Masinloc.

Family Species
Family
Species
Acanthuridae Acanthurus japonicus
Carangidae
Atule mate

Acanthurus lineatus

Carangoides orthogrammus

Acanthurus nigricans

Caranx melampygus

Acanthurus nigricauda

Caranx sexfasciatus

Acanthurus nigrofuscus

Selar crumenophthalmus

Acanthurus nigroris

Selaroides leptolepis

Acanthurus olivaceous
Centriscidae
Aeoliscus strigatus

Acanthurus pyroferus
Chaetodontidae Chaetodon auriga

Acanthurus thompsoni

Chaetodon baronessa

Acanthurus xanthopterus

Chaetodon bennetti

Ctenochaetus binotatus

Chaetodon citrinellus

Ctenochaetus striatus

Chaetodon ephippium

Ctenochaetus strigosus

Chaetodon kleini

Ctenochaetus tominiensis

Chaetodon lineolatus

Naso annulatus

Chaetodon lunula

Naso hexacanthus

Chaetodon melannotus

Naso lituratus

Chaetodon mertensii

Naso lopezi

Chaetodon octofasciatus

Naso unicornis

Chaetodon ornatissimus

Naso vlamingii

Chaetodon oxycephalus
Chaetodon


Zebrasoma flavescens

punctatofasciatus

Zebrasoma scopas

Chaetodon rafflesii

Zebrasoma veliferum

Chaetodon selene
Apogonidae Apogon aureus

Chaetodon speculum

Apogon guamensis

Chaetodon trifascialis

Apogon kallopterus

Chaetodon trifasciatus

Apogon trimaculatus

Chaetodon ulietensis

Archamia fucata

Chaetodon unimaculatus

Archamia zosterophora

Chaetodon vagabundus

Cheilodipterus macrodon

Chaetodon xanthurus
Cheilodipterus

quinquelineatus

Forcipiger longirostris

Sphaeramia nematoptera

Heniochus acuminatus
Aulostomidae Aulostomus chinensis

Heniochus chrysostomus
Balistidae
Balistapus undulatus

Heniochus monoceros

Melichthys vidua

Heniochus singularius
Pseudobalistes

flavimarginatus

Heniochus varius

Rhinecanthus verrucosus
Chanidae
Chanos chanos

Sufflamen bursa
Cirrhitidae
Cirrhitichthys falco

Sufflamen chrysopterus

Paracirrhites arcatus

Sufflamen fraenatus

Paracirrhites forsteri
Blenniidae
Aspidontus taeniatus
Dactylopteridae Dactyloptena orientalis

Atrosalarias fuscus
Diodontidae
Diodon hystrix

Istiblennius edentulus
Ephippidae
Platax orbicularis








19

Table 2 cont. List of coral reef fish in Masinloc.

Family Species
Family
Species

Platax teira

Pseudocheilinus hexataenia
Fistulariidae
Fistularia commersonii

Pseudocheilinus octotaenia
Gobiidae
Amblyeleotris guttata

Anampses caeruleopunctatus

Amblygobius albimaculatus

Anampses meleagrides

Amblygobius phalaena

Anampses twistii

Cryptocentrus cinctus

Cheilio inermis

Exyrias bellissimus

Coris batuensis

Exyrias puntang

Coris caudimacula

Valenciennea strigata

Coris gaimard
Haemulidae
Plectorhinchus chaetodonoides
Gomphosus varius

Plectorhinchus diagrammus

Halichoeres biocellatus

Plectorhinchus gaterinus

Halichoeres chrysus

Plectorhinchus lessonii

Halichoeres hortulanus

Plectorhinchus lineatus

Halichoeres margaritaceus

Plectorhinchus orientalis

Halichoeres marginatus

Plectorhinchus picus

Halichoeres melanochir
Holocentridae Myripristis adusta

Halichoeres melanurus

Myripristis kuntee

Halichoeres nebulosus

Myripristis murdjan

Halichoeres prosopeion

Myripristis violacea

Halichoeres purpurascens

Neoniphon sammara

Halichoeres richmondi

Sargocentron caudimaculatum
Halichoeres scapularis

Sargocentron diadema

Hemigymnus fasciatus

Sargocentron rubrum

Hemigymnus melapterus

Sargocentron spiniferum

Hologymnosus doliatus
Kyphosidae
Kyphosus vaigiensis

Macropharyngodon meleagris
Labridae
Bodianus axillaris

Macropharyngodon negrosensis

Bodianus diana

Stethojulis bandanensis

Bodianus loxozonus

Stethojulis strigiventer

Bodianus mesothorax

Stethojulis trilineata

Choerodon anchorago

Thalassoma hardwicke

Cheilinus celebicus

Thalassoma jansenii

Cheilinus chlorourus

Thalassoma lunare

Cheilinus fasciatus

Thalassoma lutescens

Cheilinus orientalis

Thalassoma purpureum

Cheilinus oxycephalus

Thalassoma quinquevittatum

Cheilinus trilobatus

Diproctacanthus xanthurus

Cirrhilabrus cyanopleura

Labrichthys unilineatus

Epibulus insidiator

Labroides bicolor

Oxycheilinus bimaculatus

Labroides dimidiatus

Oxycheilinus digrammus

Labropsis micronesica

Oxycheilinus unifasciatus
Lethrinidae Gnathodentex aureolineatus

Pseudocheilinus evanidus

Lethrinus harak












20

Table 2 cont. List of coral reef fish in Masinloc.

Family Species
Family Species

Lethrinus nebulosus

Ostracion meleagris

Lethrinus ornatus

Ostracion solorensis

Monotaxis grandoculis
Pempheridae Pempheris oualensis
Lutjanidae
Aphareus furca

Pempheris vanicolensis

Lutjanus biguttatus
Pinguipedidae Parapercis clathrata

Lutjanus decussatus

Parapercis cylindrica

Lutjanus fulvus

Parapercis hexopthalma

Lutjanus gibbus

Parapercis tetracantha

Lutjanus lutjanus

Parapercis xanthozona

Lutjanus monostigma
Plotosidae
Plotosus lineatus

Lutjanus vitta
Pomacanthidae Centropyge bicolor

Macolor niger

Centropyge bispinosus
Microdesmidae Nemateleotris decora

Centropyge heraldi

Nemateleotris magnifica

Centropyge tibicen

Ptereleotris evides

Centropyge vrolikii
Monacanthidae Acreichthys radiatus

Genicanthus lamarck

Acreichthys tomentosus

Pomacanthus semicirculatus

Aluterus scriptus

Pygoplites diacanthus

Amanses scopas
Pomacentridae Abudefduf sexfasciatus

Oxymonacanthus longirostris
Abudefduf vaigiensis
Acanthochromis


Pervagor aspricaudus

polyacanthus

Pervagor janthinosoma

Amblyglyphidodon aureus
Mugilidae
Crenimugil crenilabis

Amblyglyphidodon curacao
Amblyglyphidodon


Valamugil seheli

leucogaster
Mullidae
Mulloidichthys flavolineatus
Amphiprion clarkii

Mulloidichthys vanicolensis
Amphiprion melanopus

Parupeneus barberinus

Amphiprion ocel aris

Parupeneus bifasciatus

Amphiprion perideraion

Parupeneus cyclostomus

Amphiprion sandaracinos

Parupeneus indicus

Chromis amboinensis

Parupeneus multifasciatus
Chromis atripectoralis

Parupeneus pleurostigma

Chromis atripes

Upeneus tragula

Chromis lepidogenys
Muraenidae
Gymnothorax javanicus

Chromis margaritifer
Nemipteridae Pentapodus macrurus

Chromis ovatiformes

Scolopsis affinis

Chromis retrofasciata

Scolopsis bilineatus

Chromis ternatensis

Scolopsis ciliatus

Chromis vanderbilti

Scolopsis lineatus

Chromis viridis

Scolopsis margaritifer

Chromis weberi

Scolopsis monogramma

Chromis xanthura

Scolopsis trilineatus

Chrysiptera caeruleolineatus
Ostraciidae
Ostracion cubicus

Chrysiptera leucopoma





21

Table 2 cont. List of coral reef fish in Masinloc.

Family Species
Family Species
Family
Species

Chrysiptera oxycephala

Cetoscarus bicolor

Plectropomus areolatus

Chrysiptera rollandi

Chlorurus pyrrhurus

Plectropomus leopardus
Plectropomus


Chrysiptera springeri

Hipposcarus longiceps
oligacanthus

Chrysiptera talboti

Scarus bleekeri

Variola louti

Dascyllus aruanus

Scarus bowersi

Diploprion bifasciatum

Dascyllus reticulatus

Scarus dimidiatus
Siganidae Siganus argenteus

Dascyllus trimaculatus

Scarus festivus

Siganus corallinus

Dischistodus perspicillatus

Scarus flavipectoralis

Siganus doliatus

Dischistodus prosopotaenia
Scarus forsteni

Siganus fuscescens
Hemiglyphidodon

plagiometopon

Scarus frenatus

Siganus guttatus

Neoglyphidodon melas

Scarus ghobban

Siganus javus

Neoglyphidodon nigroris

Scarus globiceps

Siganus puellus

Neoglyphidodon trilobatus

Scarus microrhinos

Siganus punctatus

Plectroglyphidodon dickii

Scarus niger

Arothron nigropunctatus
Plectroglyphidodon

lacrymatus

Scarus oviceps

Canthigaster amboinensis

Pomacentrus adelus

Scarus psittacus

Canthigaster bennetti

Pomacentrus alexanderae

Scarus quoyi

Canthigaster compressa

Pomacentrus amboinensis

Scarus rivulatus

Canthigaster coronata

Pomacentrus bankanensis

Scarus schlegeli

Canthigaster janthinoptera

Pomacentrus brachialis

Scarus sordidus

Canthigaster solandri

Pomacentrus burroughi

Scarus tricolor

Canthigaster valentini

Pomacentrus chrysurus
Scorpaenidae Dendrochirus zebra
Zanclidae Zanclus cornutus

Pomacentrus coelestis

Pterois antennata



Pomacentrus lepidogenys

Pterois ruselli
45
390

Pomacentrus moluccensis

Pterois volitans


Pomacentrus
Source: UP Marine Science Institute

nigromarginatus

Scorpaenopsis diabolus Database

Pomacentrus philippinus
Serranidae
Pseudanthias huchtii
Pseudanthias




Pomacentrus smithi

squamipinnis

Pomacentrus stigma

Aethaloperca rogaa


Anyperodon



Pomacentrus vaiuli

leucogrammicus

Pomachromis richardsoni

Cephalopholis argus



Stegastes lividus

Cephalopholis boenak

Cephalopholis



Stegastes nigricans

cyanostigma
Cephalopholis




Stegastes obreptus

leopardus
Priacanthidae Priacanthus cruentatus

Cephalopholis miniata


Priacanthus hamrur

Cephalopholis urodeta


Priacanthus macracanthus
Epinephelus areolatus

Pseudochromi


dae
Labracinus cyclophthalmus
Epinephelus fasciatus
Epinephelus




Labracinus melanotaenia

hexagonatus

Pseudochromis fuscus

Epinephelus merra



Pseudochromis perspicillatus
Epinephelus ongus


Scaridae
Calotomus carolinus

Epinephelus quoyanus


Calotomus japonicus

Epinephelus tauvina




22

Table 3
List of algae for Zambales.

Species Species
Acanthophora muscoides
Hypnea cervicornis
Acanthophora spicifera
Hypnea sp.
Acetabularia crenulata
Jania decussato-dichotoma
Acetabularia major
Kappaphycus cottonii
Actinotrichia fragilis
Laurencia cartilaginea
Amansia glomerata
Laurencia flexilis
Amphiroa foliacea
Laurencia obtusa
Amphiroa fragilissima
Laurencia papillosa
Anadyomene plicata
Laurencia sp.
Anadyomene wrightii
Leveillea jungermannioides
Asparagopsis taxiformis
Liagora sp.
Avrainvillea erecta
Lobophora variegata
Avrainvillea lacerata
Mastophora rosea
Boergesenia forbesii
Mesophyllum erubescens
Enteromorpha intestinalis
Neomeris annulata
Galaxaura fasciculata
Padina australis
Galaxaura marginata
Padina sp.
Galaxaura oblongata
Padina tetrastomatica
Galaxaura sp.
Peyssonnelia rubra
Galaxaura subverticillata
Peyssonnelia sp.
Gelidiella acerosa
Porolithon boergesenii
Gelidiopsis repens
Portieria hornemannii
Gracilaria arcuata
Rhodopeltis sp.
Gracilaria coronopifolia
Sargassum baccularia
Gracilaria salicornia
Sargassum binderi
Gracilaria eucheumoides
Sargassum crassifolium
Gracilaria sp.
Sargassum cristaefolium
Gracilaria verrucosa
Sargassum polycystum
Halicoryne wrightii
Sargassum sp.

Sargassum sullivanii
Halimeda discoidea
Sporolithon erythraeum
Halimeda macroloba
Sporolithon sp.
Halimeda opuntia
Titanophora sp.
Halimeda sp.
Titanophora weberae
Halimeda velasquezii
Tolypiocladia sp.
Halymenia durvillaei
Turbinaria conoides
Halymenia maculata
Turbinaria decurrens
Hormophysa cuneiformis
Turbinaria ornata
Hydroclathrus clathratus
Turbinaria sp.
Hydroclathrus tenuis
Udotea orientalis
Hydrolithon samoense
Valonia ventricosa

Zellera tawallina

Zonaria sp.

110
Source: Holdings of the G.T. Velasquez Phycological Herbarium
as of 11/28/03 (updated by Dr. E. Ganzon-Fortes)


23

ANNEX II
STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PLAN

Type of
Name of Stakeholder
Involvement/interests
Activities/Problems
Potential
Resource Management
Stakeholder
Impact (+/-)
Participation
Livelihood




1. Local fishermen
Food, revenue
Fishing/boat anchoring, illegal
(+/-)
Many fishermen recognize the
fishing gears
importance of coral reefs and
willing to work closely with
governmental agencies if there
is sufficient enabling
environment


Registry and compliance with
the rules and regulations if they
are recipient of IEC
2. Fishermen outside Food, revenue
Fishing/boat anchoring, illegal
(-)
Compliance to local and
of Masinloc, Zambales
fishing gears
national laws if there is
sufficient IEC
3. Tourism
Revenue Guide
tours/boat
anchoring,
(+/-)
Tourism zone committee
businessmen, local
garbage, sewage
participation in Tourist
tourist boats
Management Plan
implementation
4. Tour boats outside Revenue, recreation and
Guide tours/boat anchoring,
(-) Compliance
with
visitor
of Masinloc, Zambales service providers
garbage, sewage
management protocols and
guidelines, Implementing Rules
and Regulations (IRR)
5. Tourism association Recreation and service
Snorkeling, SCUBA diving. no
(-/+)
Participation in the drafting of
and the sector
providers
diving skills, collection of
tourism guidelines and
stakeholder
coral reef organism, trampling
implementation of visitor
on corals
management system
Agencies/Institutions



Local
1. Provincial
Co-chair with the PAMB
Planning, implementation and
(+)
Coordinate with LGU and
Government
Government
management of the proposed
NGAs and POs; Policy advise
Institutions
Demonstration Site
and formalized leveraging
2.PAMB
Management policy
Assist in the implementation
(+)
Policy guide for the
implementation
of the proposed
implementation of the
demonstration site
management plans
3. FARMC
Consultative advisory
Co-management and
(+) Consultative
body
council to the LGU
implementation of the
proposed demonstration site
4. CRM Committee
LGU counterpart group
Co-management and
(+)
Local steering committee of
implementation of the
various action plans
proposed demonstration site
5. San Salvador
Conservation and protection Co-management of the
(+)
Assist in coordinating with the
Marine Conservation
of coral reefs
proposed Demonstration Site
project especially in marine
Project
sanctuary management and
operations
National
1. DENR
Co-implementation and
Assist in the implementation
(+)
GEF focal point for UNEP-SCS
Government
coordination of the proposed of the proposed
and oversight for Masinloc
Agencies
demonstration site
demonstration site
Demo site Project
2. DA-BFAR
Technical assistance and
Assist in the implementation
(+)
Partner in technical assistance
over-all project direction
of the proposed
to the LGU for Fisheries
demonstration site
Management
3. UPMSI-MERF
Technical assistance and
Assist in the implementation
(+)
Coral reef focal point for demo
coordination with
of the proposed
site; coordinate with NGA,
DENR/LGU/UNEP
demonstration site
Provincial LGU and UNEP-
GEF-SCS PCU
Organizations




People's
1. The Nagkakaisang Conservation and protection Co-management of the
(+)
Collaborator in the
Organization
Mamamayan para sa of coral reefs
proposed demonstration site
conservation and protection of
Kalikasan ng Bani
the marine sanctuary
2. The Samahang
Conservation, protection
Co-management of the
(+)
Marine sanctuary stewardship
Pangkaunlaran ng San and development of coral
proposed demonstration site
especially of mangrove
Salvador (SPSS)
reefs
reforestation
Local Non-
1. The Bantay Dagat
Conservation and protection Patrolling on the proposed
(+)
Law enforcement assistance
Government
Volunteers
of coral reefs
demonstration site
and compliance; monitoring of
Organization
CRM ordinance
Private sector
1. Masinloc Power
Management and
Co-management of the
(+)
Compliance to the ECC
Plant (NPC)
conservation of the coastal proposed demonstration site
conditionalities and guidelines
areas including the
issued by the DENR and co-
proposed demonstration site
financing for environment fund



24

ANNEX III
CAUSAL CHAIN ANALYSIS OF MASINLOC, ZAMBALES



Intervention/s
Root Causes
Causes
Problem/s



Nutrient pollution
Industrial

Poor understanding and
Information Education
Oil pollution
awareness of
Campaign
environmental concerns


Domestic
Household fecal

garbage disposal

Lack of livelihood and

Illegal/ Destructive
Livelihood alternative
Blast/sodium
poverty of coastal

Fishing
cyanide
communities

Coral Reef

Degradation
Mangrove
and Decline
Weak
Deforestation
Management and
Inadequate coordination
in Fisheries
Conservation
Siltation
Coordination
of management bodies
Planning
Illegal cutting
Accident oil
Low capability of
Capacity Building
Ecosystem
spills
institutions to implement
instability
CRM
Sudden
changes in
environment
El Niņo effect
Restocking and
Poverty condition of the
Rehabilitation
coastal communities
Overfishing

25

ANNEX IV
MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN FOR MASINLOC, ZAMBALES

1.
Collecting and reporting data on performance indicators

Environmental Indicators
Biophysical monitoring activities inside and outside (adjacent) the three community-based marine
sanctuaries will be conducted annually, from the start to the end of the project. The data collected will
be analyzed and uploaded to the established database, Marine Information Database Archive System
(MIDAS) of the Marine Science Institute. A participatory MPA monitoring will be undertaken using the
fish visual census with benthos assessment using Uychiaoco et al (2001) methods.

Socio-economic Indicators
Initial assessment (scanning and feasibility studies) of the potential livelihood options that can be
conducted will be undertaken. Consultation meetings, training and workshops will also be done with
prioritized selection of qualified community stewards of the community-based marine sanctuaries.
Team building efforts for various members of the marine sanctuary management team will also be
programmed. Integration of the fisheries and socio-economic information will utilize FISH BE
(Licuanan et al. 2004).

Process Indicators
Impact assessment of project activities such as in demonstrating sustainable community-based
marine sanctuaries network, capacity building, and supplemental livelihood linked to the stewardship
of the marine sanctuaries and information and education campaign (IEC) will be evaluated. Aside
from using the MPA rating system (CCEF 2004), this will be modified with governance indicators
(EcoGov 2 in prep) to gauge transparency, accountability and participatory decision-making in the
processes outlined earlier.

The demonstration site manager is tasked to submit progress reports including financial reports semi-
annually to the donor under the terms of agreement. This is a prerequisite for the processing and
release of the next quarter budget request. The progress of the project implementation will also be
assessed by the focal point.

2.
Schedule of mid-term review, self-evaluation and end-of-project evaluation

Monitoring/Evaluation
2005 2006
2007
3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Ecological monitoring










Mid-term review










Evaluation of the progress by
the management board










Evaluation in the end of project










The National Coral Reef committee and other related groups such as the Philippine Marine Sanctuary
support group network and the Philippine Coral Reef information network will include this as part of
the national coral reef strategy. The design of the M&E forms will follow similar protocols as in
Uychiaoco et al (2001) for the biophysical concerns and also adopt some of the World Commission on
Protected Areas (2001) protocols for management effectiveness, and the Philippine Marine Sanctuary
report card system that has adopted the CCEF MPA rating system.

3.
Description of how monitoring and evaluation activities will involve participants and
stakeholders


Participant involved in the training including stakeholders will be engaged in the monitoring and
evaluation of three community-based marine sanctuaries, coral rehabilitation and mangrove
rehabilitation. As mentioned earlier an initial technical working group will be organized to establish
criteria that will incorporate equitable representation of the major stakeholders together with their level
of commitment, technical acumen and appropriate match with their respective tasks and
responsibilities for the particular activities. A performance monitoring plans of various groups will
likewise be formulated in the 1st quarter of mobilization.

26

4.
Resources that will be allocated to monitoring and evaluation

Six thousand (US $) is allocated for the ecological monitoring for the duration of the project, which
includes consultation fees and other expenses related to monitoring. One thousand (US $) for the
mid-term review, 2500 (US $) for the evaluation of the progress by the management board and
another 2500 (US $) for the evaluation at the end of the project.

5.
How will monitoring and evaluation results be used in management?

An initial feedback of the results will be made before the end of each trip and a draft report will be
given not more than two months after data collection. After formal acceptance by the local community
and LGU, a formal presentation will be made no later than a month after formal acceptance. Two
midyear-sharing summits will b facilitated for an all stakeholders forum.


27


ANNEX V.1
BUDGET BY ACTIVITIES

GEF Government
Co-funding
Activities
GEF
Total
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
In-kind In=cask
1 Demonstrating
sustainable
community-













based marine sanctuaries network
1.1
Marine sanctuary network orientation workshop













1.1.1 Subcontract consultants for marine sanctuary
280

180

280

180 460
network orientation on the framework of marine
sanctuary network and planning meeting (2
days x $70 @ 2 consultants @ 3 sites)
1.1.2 Conduct orientation workshop (2 days x 45

450

450


450

450 900
participants x $10/day)
1.1.3 Consultation of concerned stakeholders in the
1,620
1,500
1,620

1,500 3,120
MPA network (at least 6 representative from 9
villages) (54 participants x $30; 50 participants
@ $ 30)
1.2
CRM Planning Workshop










0

0
1.2.1 Undertake CRM planning workshops for
1,350
1,350

1,350
integration (15 participants x $30 per year)
1.2.2 Updated CRM and MPA network action plan
1,800
1,800

1,800
report by consultant (3 days x $300/day x 2
periods)
1.3
Detailed assessment of two (2) additional










0

0
marine sanctuaries
1.3.1 Convene public consultations and hearings (25

750



750

750
750
1,500
participants x $10/day x 3 days; 25 participants
x $10/day x 3 days )
1.3.2 Initial assessment of potential additional marine 2,000

2,000

2,000
sanctuaries/reserves (2 persons @ 10 days @
$100)
1.3.3 Boat rental (10 days)

360







360

360
1.3.4 Assign Consultants to design and undertake

2,000



5,300


2,000
5,300
7,300
benchmarking of coral and reef fish, submit
report to local gov't. of Masinloc and Coral
Reef Management Committee (2 consultants x
$200/day x 5 days; 5 consultants x $200/day x
5 days)
1.3.5 Install mooring buoys for sanctuaries and

900

900

900
navigation markers (30 buoys @ $30)
1.3.6 Assign contractor to design, install and

1,500



3,000



1,500
3,000
4,500
maintain mooring buoys at appropriate areas
($10 @ 15 days @ 10 persons; $10 @ 15 days
@ 20 persons)
1.3.7 Boat rental (15 days)

540







540

540

29

GEF Government
Co-funding
Activities
GEF
Total
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
In-kind In=cask
1.4
Monitoring of coral and reef fish inside and










0

0
outside the sanctuary
1.4.1 Subcontract
for
monitoring activities and

3,840



7,680



3,840

7,680
11,520
prepare reports (2 persons x $160 x 4
days/year; 4 persons x $160 x 4 days/year)
1.4.2 3 Boats to be rented (15 days)

540



1,080


540
1,080
1,620
1.5
Training on reseeding and grow-out methods









0

0
(e.g. giant clams, sea urchin and abalone)
1.5.1 Participants cost (10 participants @ 5 days @

500



3,600

500

500
10)
1.5.2 Boat Rental (5 days)

180







180

180
1.5.3 Assign resource speakers for the training (2
600

3,000

600

3,000
3,600
speakers x $100/day x 3 days)
1.6
Implementation of reseeding and grow-out










0


methods of sea urchins
1.6.1 Purchase of sea urchins 1.2 @ 2700 @ 3 sites


9,720





9,720

9,720
1.6.2 Pilot reseeding activities in marine sanctuaries
900

900

3,600
4,500
of sea urchins ($ 20 @ 5 days @ 9 persons @
1 site; $ 20 @ 5 days @ 2 sites @ 18 persons)
1.6.3 Boat rental (15 days @ $ 36)

540







540

540
1.7
Reef Fishery and licensing establishment and









0

0
implementation
1.7.1 Assign consultants to establish and implement
1,000
1,000



1,000
Reef Fishery and Licensing system (5 x $100
@ 2 year)
1.7.2 Registration and renewal (5 survey technicians
450

450

450
x $30 per year)
1.8
Coral
Reef
rehabilitation

0

0
1.8.1 Assign resource speakers for the training (2
1,000

300
1,000


300
1,300
speakers x $100/day x 5 days; $300 - food,
transporation and venue)
1.8.2 Conduct training on coral reef rehabilitation


1,500



3,750

1,500
3,750
5,250
methods (10 participants x 5 days x $30/day;25
participants x 5 days x $30/day )
1.8.3 Boat rental (5 days)

180







180

180
1.90 Initial assessment of potential additional marine









0

0
sanctuaries/reserves
1.9.1 Subcontract to train, design and undertake
2,000

5,300
2,000
5,300

7,300
Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment
(PCRA), and prepare report (2 persons x
$200/day x 5 days)
1.10 Establishment of marine sanctuary fund










0

0

30


GEF Government
Co-funding
Activities
GEF
Total
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
In-kind In=cask
1.10.1 Assign finance and fund management specialist 1,500
1,500

1,500
for scanning and cost revenue analyses, set-up
business and sustainable financing plan (5
days x $100/day per year)
2
Capacity
building

0

0
2.1
Patrolling
activities

0

0
2.1.1 Contract people's organization to conduct

990

990

990
training on enforcement skill activities (15
participants x $22/day x 3 days)
2.1.2 Conduct patrolling activities (2 persons @ $8 @ 1,920
1,920

1,920
4 week @ 30 months)
2.1.3 Boat rental for patrolling (144 days @ $36)






4,320


0
4,320
4,320
2.1.4 Communication equipment such as handheld
360

360

360
radio
2.1.5 Purchase 1 binocular



50





50

50
2.1.6 Patrol light (superlight)



50





50

50
2.1.7 Mask and snorkel (10 sets)



300





300

300
2.2
Strengthen law enforcement capabilities of










0

0
Bantay dagat (sea wardens) personnel
2.2.1 Training course on legislation (2 per year @ 40

1,500






1,500

1,500
participants @ $5/day)
3
Supplemental livelihood linked to the










0

0
stewardship of the marine sanctuary
3.1.
Orientation workshop in determination of










0

0
potential alternative livelihood options and
appropriate guidelines/policies on its
implementation
3.1.1 Assign contractors to conduct training for


1,500






1,500

1,500
livelihood option/s (20 participants x $25/day x
3 days)
3.1.2 Subcontract to assess supplemental and

1,800



1,800


1,800 1,800
3,600
complementary livelihood options and conduct
alternative livelihood training for fishermen (3-
day training) (10 persons @ 3 days @ $60; 10
persons @ 3 days @ $60)
3.2
Training of the potential alternative livelihood










0

0
options

31


GEF Government
GEF
Co-funding
Total
Activities
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 1000 2000 3000 4000
5000

In-kind
In=cask

3.2.1 Conduct training on supplemental and


1,200



1,640

1,200
1,640
2,840
complementary livelihood and stewardship for
fishermen (10 participants x 3 days x $40/day;
12 participants @ 3 days @ $40/day and $100
for food and transportation)
3.2.2 Conduct training on business management (15

1,500






1,500

1,500
participants x $25/day x 2 days)
3.3
Implementation of livelihood projects










0

0
3.3.1 Contract livelihood centers to implement

10,200



174,000


10,200
174,000
184,200
livelihood projects (30 households @ $300; 580
households @ $ 300)
3.3.2 Subcontract product development and

1,500







1,500

1,500
ecolabeling (market study and product
development)
4
Information and Education Campaign










0

0
4.1 Trainings










0


0
4.1.1 Conduct of consultation meetings for public


600



600

600
600
1,200
awareness (1 per year @ 40 participants x
$5/day)
4.2 Material
development










0


0
4.2.1 Assign contractors to design and produce


2,000






2,000

2,000
brochures and posters (600 copies each)
4.2.2 Assign contractors to make bulletin boards e.g.,
1,000




6,000

1,000
6,000
7,000
fisheries administrative ordinances etc. (5
notice boards @ $200; 15 notice boards @
$400)
4.3.
Public awareness










0

0
4.3.1. Subcontract radio station to broadcast

1,000




1,000

1,000
1,000

2,000
knowledge of coral reef ecosystem on local
radio
5
Project Management and Administration










0

0
5.1
Demonstration site manager (one person @ 30 20,700








20,700

20,700
@ 690 US $)
5.2
Counterpart of management body and





9,000



0
9,000
9,000
expenses for the venue (2.5 years @ 3000
US$)
5.3
Technical assistant to the demonstration site
5,430








5,430

5,430
manager (one technical assistant @ 30 months
@181 US$)

32


GEF Government
GEF
Co-funding
Total
Activities
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 1000 2000 3000 4000
5000

In-kind
In=cask

5.4
Travel on official business (2 perons @ 3 trips
2,200



2,200



2,200
2,200
4,400
@ 3 years @ $110; 2 perons @ 3 trips @ 2.5
years @ $110)
5.5
Travel of the Focal Point to the demonstration
3,000








3,000

3,000
site (one person @ 12 trips @ 1 year @ 2.5
years @ 100 US $)
5.6
Meetings of Management Board










0


5.6.1 Transportation and hotel for the participants (2

2,100







2,100

2,100
times a year @ 7 participants X 2 days X 2.5
years X $30)
5.6.2 Co-funding from participation of the

4,500

0

4,500
4,500
management board meeting (15 participants @
3 days @ 2.5 years @ 2 meetings @ $70)
5.7
Monitoring and evaluation of the project




9,000




9,000

9,000
5.8
Office non-expendable equipment










0

0
5.8.1 One (1) LCD Projector



1,500





1,500

1,500
5.8.2 One (1) Notebook computer with accessories


1,500





1,500

1,500
5.8.3 One (1) Desktop computer



750





750

750
5.8.4 One (1) printer



150





150

150
5.8.5 One (1) Digital camera



500





500

500
5.8.6 One (1) Underwater housing (for camera)



300





300

300
5.9
Office expendable supplies



1,200





1,200

1,200
5.10
Operation and maintenance of office ($500 @







15,000
0
15,000
15,000
30months)
5.11 Communication











0

0
5.11.1 Telephone/Fax




1,500




1,500

1,500
5.11.2 Postage/Freight




600




600

600
5.12
Audit expenses 30 months

2,100






2,100

2,100

















Total 36,800
36,970
15,850
17,280
11,100
15,700
202,960
22,290
15,000
0
118,000
8,100
247,850
373,950




33

ANNEX V.2
BUDGET BY OBJECT OF EXPENDITURE



2nd 2005
1st 2006
2nd 2006
1st 2007
2nd 2007
Grand Total

Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding

GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF In-
Total GEF In-
Total


In-cash
In-cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind
kind
1000 Project personnel component





















1100
Project personnel





















1101
Demonstration
site
4,140 0 4,140 4,140
0 4,140 4,140
0 4,140 4,140
0
4,140
4,140
0
4,140 20,700
0
0 20,700
manager (one person @ 30
@ 690 US $) (5.1)
1102
Counterpart
of

1,800 1,800

1,800 1,800

1,800 1,800

1,800
1,800

1,800
1,800
0
0
9,000
9,000
management body and
expenses for the venue (30
months @ $300) (5.2)

1103 Technical assistant to the
1,086
1,086 1,086

1,086 1,086

1,086 1,086

1,086
1,086

1,086
5,430
0
0
5,430
demonstration site
manager (one technical
assistant @ 30 months
@181 US $) (5.3)

1199 Total
5,226
0 1,800 7,026 5,226
0 1,800 7,026 5,226
0 1,800 7,026 5,226
0 1,800
7,026
5,226
0
1,800
7,026 26,130
0
9,000 35,130

1200
Consultant








1201 Consultations of concerned
0 0
0 1,620
1,500 3,120
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,620
0
1,500
3,120
stakeholders in the MPA
network (at least 6
representative from 9
villages) (54 participants x
$30) (1.1.3)

1202 Updated CRM and MPA
0 0
0
0

0
0
900
0
900
0

0
0
900
0
900
1,800
0
0
1,800
network action plan report
by consultant (3 days x
$300/day x 2 periods)
(1.2.2)
1203
Assign resource speakers
0 0
0
600
3,000 3,600
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
600
0
3,000
3,600
for the training (2 speakers
x $100/day x 5 days)
(1.5.3)
1204
Assign consultants to
500 0
500
0

0
0
500
0
500
0

0
0


0
0
1,000
0
0
1,000
establish and implement
Reef Fishery and Licensing
system (5 x $100 @2
years) (1.7.1)

1205 Registration and renewal (5
150 0
150
0

0
0
150
0
150
0

0
0
150
0
150
450
0
0
450
survey technicians x $30
per year) (1.7.2)

1299 Total
650
0
0
650 2,220
0 4,500 6,720 1,550
0
0 1,550
0
0
0
0
1,050
0
0
1,050
5,470
0
4,500
9,970

34



2nd 2005
1st 2006
2nd 2006
1st 2007
2nd 2007
Grand Total

Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding

GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF In-
Total GEF In-
Total


In-cash
In-cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind
kind

1600 Travel on official
























business

1601 Travel on official business
440
440
880
440
440
880
440
440
880
440
440
880
440
440
880
2,200
0
2,200
4,400
(2 persons @ 10 trips
@110 US $) (5.4)

1602 Travel of the Focal Point to
600 0
600
600
0
600
600
0
600
600
0
600
600
0
600
3,000
0
0
3,000
the demonstration site (one
person @ 30 months @
$100) (5.5)

1699 Total
1,040
0
440 1,480 1,040
0
440 1,480 1,040
0
440 1,480 1,040
0
440
1,480
1,040
0
440
1,480
5,200
0
2,200
7,400

1999 Component total
6,916
0 2,240 9,156 8,486
0 6,74015,226 7,816
0 2,24010,056 6,266
0 2,240
8,506
7,316
0
2,240
9,556 36,800
0
15,700 52,500
2000 Sub-contract component
























2200
Subcontract
component

























2201 Subcontract consultants for
0 0
0
280
180
460
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
280
0
180
460
marine sanctuary network
orientation on the
framework of marine
sanctuary network and
planning meeting (2 days x
$70 @ 2 consultants @ 3
sites) (1.1.1)

2202 Initial assessment of
0 0
0 2,000
0 2,000
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
2,000
0
0
2,000
potential additional marine
sanctuaries/reserves (2
persons @ 10 days @
$100) (1.3.2)

2203 Boat rental (10 days)
0 0
0
360
0
360
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
360
0
0
360
(1.3.3)
2204
Assign Consultants to
0 0
0 2,000
5,300 7,300
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
2,000
0
5,300
7,300
design and undertake
benchmarking of coral and
reef fish, submit report to
local gov't. of Masinloc and
Coral Reef Management
Committee (2 consultants x
$200/day x 5 days) (1.3.4)
2205
Assign contractor to
0 0
0 1,500
3,000 4,500
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,500
0
3,000
4,500
design, install and maintain
mooring buoys at
appropriate areas ($10 @
15 days @ 10 persons)
(1.3.6)


35



2nd 2005
1st 2006
2nd 2006
1st 2007
2nd 2007
Grand Total

Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding

GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF In-
Total GEF In-
Total


In-cash
In-cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind
kind

2206 Boat rental (15 days)
0 0
0
540
0
540
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
540
0
0
540
(1.3.7)
2207
Subcontract
for
monitoring
1,280
2,560 3,840
0

0
0 1,280
2,560 3,840
0

0
0
1,280
2,560
3,840
3,840
0
7,680 11,520
activities and prepare
reports (2 persons x $160 x
5 days/year) (1.4.1)

2208 Boat rental (15 days)
180
360
540
0

0
0
180
360
540
0

0
0
180
360
540
540
0
1,080
1,620
(1.4.2)

2209 Boat Rental (5 days) (1.5.2)
0

0
0
180
0
180
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
180
0
0
180

2210 Boat rental (15 days @
0 0
0
0

0
0
540
0
540
0

0
0
0

0
0
540
0
0
540
$36) (1.6.3)
2211
Assign resource speakers
0 0
0
0

0
0 1,000
300 1,300
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,000
0
300
1,300
for the training (2 speakers
x $100/day x 5 days)
(1.8.1)

2212 Boat rental (5 days @ $36)
0 0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
180
0
180
0

0
0
180
0
0
180
(1.8.3)

2214 Subcontract to train, design 2,000 5,300
7,300
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
2,000 5,300

7,300
and undertake Participatory
Coastal Resource
Assessment (PCRA), and
prepare report (2 persons x
$200/day x 5 days) (1.9.1)
2215
Assign finance and fund
500 0
500
0

0
0
500
0
500
0

0
0
500
0
500
1,500
0
0
1,500
management specialist for
scanning and cost revenue
analyses, set-up business
and sustainable financing
plan (5 days x $130/day
per year) (1.10.1)
2216
Contract
people's
0 0
0
0

0
0
990
0
990
0

0
0
0

0
0
990
0
0
990
organization to conduct
training on enforcement
skill activities (15
participants x $22/day x 3
days) (2.1.1)

2217 Conduct patrolling activities
384 0
384
384
0
384
384
0
384
384
0
384
384
0
384
1,920
0
0
1,920
(2 persons @ $10 @ 4
week @ 36 months)
(2.1.2)

2218 Boat rental for patrolling


864
864

864
864

864
864

864
864
864
864

0
4,320 4,320
(144 days @ 30 months)
(2.1.3)

36



2nd 2005
1st 2006
2nd 2006
1st 2007
2nd 2007
Grand Total

Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding

GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF In-
Total GEF In-
Total


In-cash
In-cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind
kind

2219 Subcontract to assess
0
0
0
0

0
0 1,800 1,800
3,600
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,800 1,800

3,600
supplemental and
complementary livelihood
options and conduct
alternative livelihood
training for fishermen (3-
day training) (3.1.2)

2220 Contract livelihood centers
0
0
0
0

0
0 3,000
34,80037,800 3,600
69,600 73,200
3,600
69,600 73,200 10,200
0 174,000 184,200
to implement livelihood
projects (30 households @
$300; 580 households @ $
300) (3.3.1)
2221
Subcontract
product
0
0
0
0

0
0
750
0
750
750
0
750
0

0
0
1,500
0
0
1,500
development and
ecolabeling (market study
and product development)
(3.3.2)
2222
Assign contractors to
0
0
0 2,000
0 2,000
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
2,000
0
0
2,000
design and produce
brochures and posters (600
copies each) (4.2.1)
2223
Audit expenses 2.5 years
0
0
0
700
0
700
0

0
0
700
0
700
700

700
2,100
0
0
2,100
(5.12)

2299 Total
4,344 5,300 3,78413,428 9,944
0 9,34419,28810,424 1,80038,88451,108 5,614
070,464 76,078
6,644
0 73,384 80,028 36,970 7,100 195,860 239,930

2999 Component total
4,344 5,300 3,78413,428 9,944
0 9,34419,28810,424 1,80038,88451,108 5,614
070,464 76,078
6,644
0 73,384 80,028 36,970 7,100 195,860 239,930
3000 Training component
























3200
Group
training
























3201
Conduct
orientation
0
0
0
450
450
900
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
450
0
450
900
workshop (2 days x 45
participants x $10/day)
(1.1.2)
3202
Undertake
CRM
planning 450
0
450
0

0
0
450
0
450
0

0
0
450
0
450
1,350
0
0
1,350
workshops for integration
(15 participants x $30 per
year) (1.2.1)
3203
Convene
public
750

750 1,500
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
750
0
750
1,500
consultations and hearings
(25 participants x $10/day x
3 days) (1.3.1)
3204
Participants
cost
(10
0
0
0
500
0
500
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
500
0
0
500
participants @ 5 days @
10) (1.5.1)


37



2nd 2005
1st 2006
2nd 2006
1st 2007
2nd 2007
Grand Total

Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding

GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF In-
Total GEF In-
Total


In-cash
In-cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind
kind

3205 Pilot restocking activities in
0 0
0
0

0
0
900
3,600 4,500
0

0
0
0

0
0
900
0
3,600
4,500
marine sanctuaries of sea
urchins (1.6.2)

3206 Conduct training on coral
0 0
0
0

0
0 1,500
3,750 5,250
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,500
0
3,750
5,250
reef rehabilitation methods
(10 participants x 5 days x
$30/day) (1.8.2)
3207
Training
course
on
500 0
500
0

0
0
500
0
500
0

0
0
500
0
500
1,500
0
0
1,500
legislation (2 per year @ 40
participants @ $5/day)
(2.2.1)
3208
Assign contractors to
0 0
0
0

0
0 1,500
0 1,500
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,500
0
0
1,500
conduct training for
livelihood option/s (20
participants x $25/day x 3
days) (3.1.1)
3209
Conduct
training
on
0 0
0
0

0
0 1,200 1,640
2,840
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,200
1,640
2,840
supplemental and
complementary livelihood
and stewardship for
fishermen (10 participants x
3 days x $40/day) (3.2.1)
3210
Conduct
training
on
0 0
0
0

0
0 1,500
0 1,500
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,500
0
0
1,500
business management (15
participants x $25/day x 3
days) (3.2.2)

3211 Assign contractors to make 1,000
6,000 7,000
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,000
0
6,000
7,000
bulletin boards e.g.,
fisheries administrative
ordinances etc. (5 notice
boards @ $200; 15 notice
boards @ $400) (4.2.2)

3213 Subcontract radio station to
200 200
400
200 200

400
200
200

400
200 200

400
200 200

400
1,000 1,000
0
2,000
broadcast knowledge of
coral reef ecosystem on
local radio (4.3.1)

3214 Transportation and hotel for
420

420
420

420
420

420
420

420
420

420
2,100
0
0
2,100
the participants (2 times a
year @ 7 participants X 2
days X 2.5 years X $30)
(5.6.1)

3299 Total
3,320
200 6,75010,270 1,570 200
450 2,220 8,170 1,840 7,35017,360
620 200
0
820
1,570 200
0
1,770 15,250 1,000
16,190
32,440


38



2nd 2005
1st 2006
2nd 2006
1st 2007
2nd 2007
Grand Total

Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding

GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF In-
Total GEF In-
Total


In-cash
In-cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind
kind
3300
Meeting/conference







3301 Conduct of consultation
200
200
400
0

0
0
200
200
400
0

0
0
200
200
400
600
0
600
1,200
meetings for public
awareness (1 per year @
40 participants x $5/day)
(4.1.1)
3302
Co-funding
from
0
900
900
0
900
900
0
900
900
0
900
900
0
900
900
0
0
4,500
4,500
participation of the
management board
meeting ( 15 participants @
3 days @ 5 meetings @ 2
meetings @ $30) (5.6.2)

3399 Total
200
0 1,100 1,300
0
0
900
900
200
0 1,100 1,300
0
0
900
900
200
0
1,100
1,300
600
0
5,100
5,700

3999 Component total
3,520
200 7,85011,570 1,570 200 1,350 3,120 8,370 1,840 8,45018,660
620 200
900
1,720
1,770 200
1,100
3,070 15,850 1,000
21,290
38,140
4000 Equipment component

























4100
Expendable
equipment






4101 Purchase of sea urchins
0

0
0
0

0
0 9,720
0 9,720
0

0
0
0

0
0
9,720
0
0
9,720

4199 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 9,720
0
0 9,720
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,720
0
0
9,720
4200
Non-expendable
























equipment

4201 Install mooring buoys for
0 0
0
900
0
900
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
900
0
0
900
sanctuaries and navigation
markers (45 buoys @ $35)
(1.3.5)
4202
Communication
equipment
360 0
360
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
360
0
0
360
such as handheld radio
(2.1.4)

4203 Purchase 2 binoculars
50 0
50
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
50
0
0
50
(2.1.5)

4204 Patrol light (superlight)
50 0
50
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
50
0
0
50
(2.1.6)

4205 Mask and snorkel (10 sets)
300 0
300
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
300
0
0
300
(2.1.7)

4206 One (1) LCD Projector
1,500 0 1,500
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,500
0
0
1,500
(5.8.1)

4207 One (1) Notebook
1,500 0 1,500
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
1,500
0
0
1,500
computer with accessories
(5.8.2)

4208 One (1) Desktop computer
750 0
750
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
750
0
0
750
(5.8.3)

4209 One (1) printer (5.8.4)
150 0
150
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
150
0
0
150


39



2nd 2005
1st 2006
2nd 2006
1st 2007
2nd 2007
Grand Total

Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding
Co-funding

GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF
In-
In-
Total GEF In-
Total GEF In-
Total


In-cash
In-cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind cash
kind
kind

4210 One (1) Digital camera
500 0
500
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
500
0
0
500
(5.8.5)

4211 One (1) Underwater
300 0
300
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

0
0
300
0
0
300
housing (for camera)
(5.8.6)

4212 Office expendable supplies
240 0
240
240
0
240
240
0
240
240
0
240
240
0
240
1,200
0
0
1,200
(5.9)

4299 Total
5,700
0
0 5,700 1,140
0
0 1,140
240
0
0
240
240
0
0
240
240
0
0
240
7,560
0
0
7,560
4300
Premises
























4301
Operation
and
0
3,000 3,000
0
3,000 3,000
0
3,000 3,000
0
3,000
3,000
0
3,000
3,000
0
0
15,000
15,000
maintenance of office 500
@ 30 months (5.10)

4399 Total
0
0 3,000 3,000
0
0 3,000 3,000
0
0 3,000 3,000
0
0 3,000
3,000
0
0
3,000
3,000
0
0
15,000
15,000

4999 Component total
5,700
0 3,000 8,700 1,140
0 3,000 4,140 9,960
0 3,00012,960
240
0 3,000
3,240
240
0
3,000
3,240 17,280
0
15,000
32,280
5000
Miscellaneous
component






5200
Reporting
costs

























5201 Monitoring and evaluation
0

0

0

0
0 4,500
0 4,500
0

0
0
4,500
0
4,500
9,000
0
0
9,000
of the project (5.7)

5299 Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 4,500
0
0 4,500
0
0
0
0
4,500
0
0
4,500
9,000
0
0
9,000
5300
Sundry
























5301
Telephone/Fax
(5.11.1) 300 0
300
300
0
300
300
0
300
300
0
300
300
0
300
1,500
0
0
1,500
5302
Postage/Freight
(5.11.2) 120 0
120
120
0
120
120
0
120
120
0
120
120
0
120
600
0
0
600

5399 Total
420
0
0
420
420
0
0
420
420
0
0
420
420
0
0
420
420
0
0
420
2,100
0
0
2,100

5999 Component total
420
0
0
420
420
0
0
420 4,920
0
0 4,920
420
0
0
420
4,920
0
0
4,920 11,100
0
0
11,100

9999 Project Total
20,900 5,50016,87443,27421,560 20020,43442,19441,490 3,64052,57497,70413,160 20076,604 89,964 20,890 200 79,724 100,814 118,000 8,100 247,850 373,950

























373,950



40

ANNEX VI
ARRANGEMENTS FOR CO-ORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT

Coral Reef Management Council

The Coral Reef Management Council (CRM Council)
shall have authority and responsibility for the
conduct of activities at the demonstration site as a Management Board. The composition of this
body, its terms of reference and powers shall be clearly defined in a set of terms of reference that
shall be eventually be part of the demonstration site proposal outcome of activities.

The Management Board shall be composed of representatives of all major stakeholders having an
interest in and deriving benefit from the coral reef and resources within the defined limits of the
demonstration site. Initially the membership shall include:

1)
Specialized Executing Agency (SEA, University of the Philippines ­ Marine Science
Institute)
2)
Site Manager (Secretary)
3)
Provincial Office of Administration
4)
Protected Area Management Board (PAMB) - Representative (Regional Office III)
5)
DENR-Coastal and Marine Management Division (Regional Office III)
6)
Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (Regional Office III)
7)
Local Government Unit (LGUs) ­ Coastal Resource Management Officer
8)
Municipal Agriculture Office (LGU-MAO)
9)
Municipal Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council (FARMC)
10) Bantay Dagat (Head Officer)
11) Samahang Pangkaunlaran ng San Salvador (SPSS)
12) National Power Corporation (NPC) ­ Masinloc Coal Fired Thermal Power Plant
13) Nagkakaisang Mamamayan para sa Kalikasan ng Bani (NMKB)

Additional representatives may be added to the membership of the Board by simple decision of the
Board.

The frequency of the meetings:

The Management Board shall meet semi-annually.
The local Sanctuary and Reserves meet no less than monthly
Local Government Unit (LGU) meets quarterly

Functions:

The Management Board shall be responsible for:

1)
Selection of the demonstration site manager
2)
Review and approval of the stakeholder analysis, and financial plans regarding the
generation of revenue streams;
3)
Development and implementation of a Business plan for the site designed to result in
financial independence and sustainability following expenditure of the GEF grant funds;
4)
Development and implementation of a management plan for the site, which shall detail the
approved uses and their levels, procedures for approval of activities at the site (including
inter alia: issuance of permits and licenses; maintenance of financial and other records;
public awareness raising activities; and the methods through which control shall be
exercised by the competent authorities;
5)
Review proposals for the harmonisation of existing legislation regarding conservation and
sustainable use of marine and coastal resources, and submit to the appropriate authority for
approval;

41

6)
Provide financial control and oversight of income and expenditures in accordance with the
approved business plan;
7)
Approval of the draft programme of public awareness, education and training activities, to
be conducted at the site, and clearance for publication of appropriate educational and
awareness materials;
8)
Approval of the draft proposed programme of activities that will be provided at the site for
exchange personnel over a defined time frame of between two and six months;
9)
Timely reporting on activities to the National Committee or Sub-committee responsible for the
relevant sub-component of the project, and through the Specialized Executing Agency to the
National Technical Focal Point and Focal Ministry for the UNEP/GEF South China Sea
Project.

The Masinloc Demonstration Site Management Board shall appoint a Demonstration Site Manager
whose responsibility will be to report to the Focal Point for Coral Reefs. The Site Manager shall be
considered a full member of the Philippine National Coral Reef Committee.

The Demonstration Site Manager should have responsibility for managing, the activities at the
demonstration site, under the direction of Protected Area Management Board (PAMB), which is
under the Protected Area Wildlife Bureau (PAWB) of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR).

Specifically the Demonstration Site Manager shall take responsibility for:

1)
Executing the work plan taking into account any amendments that shall be agreed by the
Management Board;
2)
Planning, and managing on a day to day basis identified in the implementation plan,
including preparation and supervision of annual work plan and timetables;
3)
Financial responsibility for the approved budget within clearly defined limits set by the
management body, including keeping proper books of account and preparing financial
reports for the management body;
4)
Responsibility for execution of the activities in accordance with the work plan and timetable
and schedule of expenditures, initially defined by the demonstration site proposal and
amended from time to time by the management body;
5)
Responsibility for acting as Secretary to the meetings of the Management Board;
6)
Reporting on activities and outcomes, to the management body, the focal point of the SEA,
and the National Technical Focal Point according to an agreed schedule;
7)
Preparing inputs to the six-monthly expenditure reports, six monthly progress reports and
cash advance requests to be submitted to the Project Co-ordinating Unit (PCU), through the
focal point of the responsible Specialized Executing Agency (SEA);
8)
Preparing and submitting to the PCU, through the focal point of the SEA, technical reports
in accordance with the defined outputs of the demonstration site; and,
9) Attending such national and regional meetings as shall be determined on an individual
basis.







42

Coordination Framework of Masinloc Demonstration Site



PSC
RSTC
RWG-CR




CRM Council
SEA
PAMB
PCU
Technical
UPMSI
LGUs
DENR
Advisory
Consultative
Body
CENRO
FARMC
Demonstration
Other TWG
Site Manager
Marine
Marine
Marine
Sanctuary and
Sanctuary and
Sanctuary and
Reproductive
Reproductive
Reproductive
Reserve
Reserve
Reserve
Committee 1
Committee 2
Committee 3

43