Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
GEORGIAN EXPERIENCE –
and Strategy for Future

  • DAVID NAKANI
  • Environmental Pollution Control Program


  • DAREJAN KAPANADZE
  • World Bank Office Tbilisi


  • Georgia


2
Structure of Presentation:

  • Background
  • Project objectives
  • Project implementation
  • Challenges faced
  • Successful solutions
  • Outputs and impact
  • Conclusions and future perspectives


3
Background
  • Main burning issue - soil erosion
  • Pollution of rivers draining into the Black Sea
  • Heavy use of pesticides and fertilizers
  • Weak environmental regulations


4
Background continued
  • No3 - N concentrations in river waters are several times higher than EU water quality standards
  • Higher chemical concentration in fruits and vegetables limits exports to EC markets
  • Farmers lack skills to adopt modern farming methods that are environmentally sound
  • Destruction of bio-diversity (flora and fauna)
  • Deforestation for lack of fossil fuels
5
Environment Pollution Control Program
  • Preparation stage: 1999 – 2001
  •    Technologies/best practices selected for extension:
      • Improved storage, handling and utilization of animal waste
      • Recovery of degraded soils and sustainable land cultivation
      • Environment friendly protection of crops and increase of productivity
      • Monitoring quality of water and soil
  • Implementation stage: 2002-2006
      • Demonstration and acquisition of the selected technologies
      • Assessing their efficiency, impact and sustainability


6
Objectives
  • Promote efficient practices of on-farm nutrient  management in the selected watersheds to reduce river water pollution and meet requirements of the EU Nitrate and Clean Water Directives
  • Demonstrate and disseminate use of bio-gas digesters to reduce household demand for firewood and cut  methane emissions into the atmosphere
  • Carry out adaptive research, on-farm testing and extension of the advanced farming practices that improve productivity and decrease environmental damage




7
Challenges Faced
  • Choosing watersheds adequate for Program implementation and farmer education
  • Picking farmers for adoption of environment friendly agricultural practices
  • Selecting appropriate technologies/practices for pollution control
  • Optimizing bio-gas digester design to achieve good performance throughout all seasons
  • Operating in a setting with poor rural economy and weak infrastructure






8
Successful Solutions
  • Controlling soil erosion –
  •     terracing, contouring, buffer strips, reduces tillage, crop rotation
  • Reducing the flow of manure and chemicals to river waters –
  •     manure storage facilities, bio-gas digesters, use of manure as fertilizer and nutrient management
  • Minimizing the use of pesticides –
  •     laying basis for the development of organic farming
  • Monitoring river and ground water quality and assessing impact of the adopted practices
9
 
10
2002-2004 Outputs and Impact
  • Bio-gas digesters installed at 120 farms
  • Manure storage facilities arranged at 310 farms
  • Good agricultural practices adopted in 279 farms
  • Individual nutrient management plans developed for 220 farmers
  • Training in good management practices delivered to 2500 farmers
  • Comprehensive water monitoring program put in place for three watersheds


  • In three years the Ochkhomuri river water quality
  • improved significantly to meet EU nitrate standard


11
Conclusions
  • Focusing agricultural research on farmers’ needs and adapting it to the real rural life setting is a single window of opportunity for the national agricultural knowledge system
  • Extension of advanced technologies to the subsistence, small and medium farmers is a challenging task, taking time and resources for demonstrating, carrying out participatory trails and building awareness
  • Making tangible change in the quality of environment proved possible through concentration of external and local resources within a focus area
  • Strong economic incentives are only viable tools for sustaining the present positive trend as well as for exporting it beyond the pilot area


12
Challenges
for Scaling up EPC Program
    • Agricultural non-point sources of pollution have significant impact on water quality at present, with a potential to increase in future
    • Majority of Georgian farmers do not use environment friendly technologies and are unaware of damage to public health and environment made by their current farming practices
    • Georgia lacks adequate environmental regulations and economic policies to achieve compliance with EU Nitrate and Clean Water Directives

13
Strategy for Future
  •    Facilitate compliance with the obligations of EU
  •    membership
    • Develop adequate environmental regulations and create economic incentives
    • Set up a viable extension system to rejuvenate rural economy and develop export opportunities
    • Establish a reliable and affordable long-term water quality monitoring program
    • Seek opportunities for receiving support from GEF, EU, MCG, bilateral donors and other sources in carrying on the successfully piloted activities


14
"Thank You"


  • Thank You